Assessment of tumor angiogenesis as a prognostic factor of survival in patients with oligodendroglioma.

According to World Health Organization (WHO) and Daumas-Duport grading systems, progression of oligodendrogliomas (ODGs) to a higher grade (WHO grade III, grade B) is associated with increased angiogenesis. Based on multivariate assessment of molecular, pathological, and radiological parameters, we further assessed the influence of tumor angiogenesis on tumor progression and patient survival. Patients with a diagnosis of ODG, consecutively treated in a single institution, were reviewed and reclassified according to WHO and Daumas-Duport grading systems. MRI scans were reviewed to assess contrast enhancement and necrosis. Tissue sections were used for pathology review and to evaluate immunostaining of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGF-R), Ki-67, and CD34. Multivariate analysis was performed to assess the impact of tumor angiogenesis-related pathological and radiological factors on patient survival. One hundred thirty-four patients with pure ODG were included in this study. Multivariate analysis identified four independent poor prognostic factors: necrosis, absence of seizure, increased vascularization, and age >55 years. A subgroup of patients with tumor necrosis, increased vascularization, and absence of seizures had a significantly worse outcome than predicted, with a median overall survival of 14.2 months. VEGF expression was significantly higher in this subgroup and correlated with disease progression regardless of histologic grade. Based on the presence of radiological or pathological necrosis, contrast enhancement or endothelial hyperplasia, and absence of seizures, a high risk group of ODG can be identified with significantly worse overall survival. Also, VEGF over-expression in ODG constitutes an early marker for predicting tumor progression.

Prognostic value of health-related quality-of-life data in predicting survival in patients with anaplastic oligodendrogliomas, from a phase III EORTC brain cancer group study.

PURPOSE: This is one of a few studies that have explored the value of baseline symptoms and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in predicting survival in patients with brain cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Baseline HRQOL scores (from the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer [EORTC] Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 and the EORTC Brain Cancer Module) were examined in 247 patients with anaplastic oligodendrogliomas to determine the relationship with overall survival by using Cox proportional hazards regression models. Refined techniques as the bootstrap resampling procedure and the computation of C indexes and R2 coefficients were used to explore the stability of the models as well as better assess the potential benefit of using HRQOL to predict survival in clinical practice and research. RESULTS: Classical analysis controlled for major clinical prognostic factors selected emotional functioning (P = .0016), communication deficit (P = .0261), future uncertainty (P = .0481), and weakness of legs (P = .0001) as statistically significant prognostic factors of survival. However, several issues question the validity of these findings and no single model was found to be preferable over all others. C indexes, which estimate the probability of a model to correctly predict which patient among a randomly chosen pair of patients will survive longer, and R2 coefficients, which measure the proportion of variability explained by the model, did not exhibit major improvement when adding selected or all HRQOL scores to clinical factors. CONCLUSION: While classical techniques lead to positive results, more refined analyses suggest that baseline HRQOL scores add relatively little to clinical factors to predict survival. These results may have implications for future use of HRQOL as a prognostic factor for patients with cancer.

Proposal of a scoring scale as a survival predictor in intracranial oligodendrogliomas.

INTRODUCTION: Histological, clinical and radiological features, and molecular genetic analysis are among the factors that have been considered in defining the prognosis of oligodendrogliomas (OD), but they have yielded conflicting results. The purpose of this study was to test out a scoring scale based on clinical, radiological, pathological and molecular features. MATERIAL AND METHOD: To identify factors with prognostic significance, we analyzed 87 treated patients with a histological diagnosis of OD. Of the parameters analyzed, age, onset, clinical status, radiological enhancement, histological necrosis, mitosis and chromosomal anomalies emerged as significant prognosis factors using univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis revealed age and chromosomal anomalies as independent factors of survival. RESULTS: The factors with a significant prognostic value were combined to determine which grouping factors best predict outcome. The proposed score is a pure number resulting from a combination of: 2 major factors: age and chromosomal anomalies (scored 3-0); 5 minor factors: onset, clinical examination, necrosis, mitoses (scored 1-0), and radiological enhancement (scored 2-0). According to our scale, 10 survival curves were produced for overall survival. Recursive partitioning of patients with the nearest score and outcome produced four groups with a significant difference in survival (p=10(-5)). The power of both the scale and the partitioned groups for predicting outcome was more accurate than the WHO and St Anne grading systems, and the molecular sub-classification. CONCLUSIONS: Our scale is a plausible way of classifying patients harboring intracranial OD according to expected survival.

Assessment of malignancy of glioma by positron emission tomography with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose and single photon emission computed tomography with thallium-201 chloride.

The histological diagnosis and proliferative potential measured by bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) labelling index (LI) were correlated with preoperative CT and contrast-enhanced, MRI, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) and 201T1 single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in 43 patients with various grades of glioma. 201T1 SPECT had slightly higher sensitivity to tumours with BrdU LI > or = 5% (showing 10/10) than 18F-FDG PET (7/8 tumours). 18F-FDG PET was better for identifying tumours of BrdU LI < 1% (13/15) than 201T1 SPECT (13/22). Accumulation of 201T1 in the tumour was slightly different from contrast enhancement on CT and/or MRI, and gave "false-positive" results in some low-grade gliomas. However, 201T1 SPECT, which is available in many hospitals and may cost less, provided useful information to supplement that from CT and MRI.