Antibiotic Prescribing Patterns Among U.S. Ophthalmologists and Optometrists from 2018 to 2021 in the Medicare Part D Database.

Purpose: To assess antibiotic prescribing patterns among ophthalmologists and optometrists from 2018 to 2021. Methods: This is an observational, retrospective cohort study of the Medicare Part D prescriber public use files from 2018 to 2020. Prescription trends were analyzed with analysis of variance and negative binomial regression tests based on specialty, region, and types of antibiotics. Results: From 2018 to 2021, the number of ophthalmologists in the Medicare Part D database decreased from 18,452 to 18,285, and the number of optometrists increased from 23,071 to 24,734. Throughout the study period, the total number and proportion of antibiotic prescriptions by ophthalmologists and optometrists stayed almost constant with a dip in 2020, likely reflecting the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Both ophthalmologists and optometrists demonstrated geographic regional differences in prescribing patterns. The South consistently had the highest average number of claims per provider. Of the antibiotics prescribed by ophthalmologists in 2021, 48.6% are from the fluoroquinolone class, 20.5% are from the aminoglycoside class, and 18.2% are from the macrolide class. Optometrists were found to be more likely to prescribe antibiotics in a formulation combined with a corticosteroid throughout the study period. Conclusions: Our results have shown that prescribing patterns among ophthalmologists and optometrists have demonstrated significant changes in prescriptions of microbial resistance-promoting antibiotics. These patterns persist despite nation-wide attempts to control antimicrobial resistance.

COUNTY-LEVEL ANALYSIS OF EYE EXAM ACCESS AND UTILIZATION IN THE UNITED STATES.

PURPOSE: The eye exam is a critical tool for the prevention, screening, and diagnosis of ocular and systemic conditions. In this study, we characterize county-level variation in eye exam access and utilization for Medicare patients in the United States. METHODS: This nationwide study uses the Medicare Physician & Other Practitioners - by Provider and Service dataset. We included all ophthalmologists and optometrists who performed eye exams on Medicare beneficiaries within a United States county in 2019. For every county where exams were performed, we calculated the number of practicing vision testing providers, percentage of providers classified as ophthalmologists, and the number of exams per 100 Medicare beneficiaries. Multiple linear regression was used to characterize associations between these variables and county characteristics, including measures of poverty, education, and income. RESULTS: In 2019, 28937,540 eye exams were performed by 46,000 providers in 2,291 U.S. counties. In the median county, 34.9 eye exams were provided per 100 Medicare beneficiaries. The average county had 20.1 exam providers, 16.5% of whom were ophthalmologists. There were a median 6.6 eye exam providers for every 10,000 Medicare beneficiaries in the average county. The average provider performed 517.8 exams. Regression showed counties with lower median household incomes, higher poverty rates, or fewer high-school graduates had fewer eye exam providers per 10,000 Medicare beneficiaries and fewer eye exams performed per 100 Medicare beneficiaries. CONCLUSIONS: We find significant county-level variation in eye exam utilization and provider availability. This reflects broader, well-recognized trends in socioeconomic health disparities in the U.S.

Assessment of optometrists' referral accuracy and contributing factors: A review.

PURPOSE: In the UK, ophthalmology has the highest number of outpatient appointments within the National Health Service. False-positive referrals from primary care are one of the main factors contributing to the oversubscription of hospital eye services (HESs). We reviewed the accuracy of referrals originating from primary care optometrists and contributing factors, such as condition type and years since registration. RECENT FINDINGS: Of the 31 studies included in the review, 22 were retrospective analyses of referrals and appointments at the HES. Eight were prospective studies, and one used online clinical vignettes. Seven assessed the accuracy of referrals for all ocular conditions. The remaining studies focused on glaucoma (n = 11), cataracts (n = 7), emergency conditions (n = 4), neovascular age-related macular degeneration (n = 1) and paediatric binocular vision (n = 1). The diagnostic agreement for suspected emergency ocular conditions was the lowest, with only 21.1% of referrals considered to require urgent attention in one study. For glaucoma, the first-visit discharge rate was high (16.7%-48%). Optometrist referral accuracy was overall 18.6% higher than General Medical Practitioners'; however, the two mainly referred different ocular conditions. Female optometrists made more false-positive referrals than males (p = 0.008). The proportion of false positives decreased by 6.2% per year since registration (p < 0.001). SUMMARY: There was significant variation in referral accuracy across different ocular conditions, partly due to differences when defining accurate referrals. Optometrists working in primary care are generally more limited in their resources than the HES. Thus, choosing the cautious option of referral when they are unsure could be in the patients' best interests. The possible effect of increased use of advanced imaging on referrals requires evaluation. Although interventions such as refinement schemes have been put in place, these vary across regions, and their approaches such as virtual referral triaging may reduce unnecessary HES face-to-face appointments and promote communication between primary and secondary care.

Evaluating Access to Laser Eye Surgery by Driving Times Using Medicare Data and Geographical Mapping.

Importance: Recently, several states have granted optometrists privileges to perform select laser procedures (laser peripheral iridotomy, selective laser trabeculoplasty, and YAG laser capsulotomy) with the aim of increasing access. However, whether these changes are associated with increased access to these procedures among each state's Medicare population has not been evaluated. Objective: To compare patient access to laser surgery eye care by estimated travel time and 30-minute proximity to an optometrist or ophthalmologist. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort database study used Medicare Part B claims data from 2016 through 2020 for patients accessing new patient or laser eye care (laser peripheral iridotomy, selective laser trabeculoplasty, YAG) from optometrists or ophthalmologists in Oklahoma, Kentucky, Louisiana, Arkansas, and Missouri. Analysis took place between December 2021 and March 2023. Main Outcome and Measures: Percentage of each state's Medicare population within a 30-minute travel time (isochrone) of an optometrist or ophthalmologist based on US census block group population and estimated travel time from patient to health care professional. Results: The analytic cohort consisted of 1 564 307 individual claims. Isochrones show that optometrists performing laser eye surgery cover a geographic area similar to that covered by ophthalmologists. Less than 5% of the population had only optometrists (no ophthalmologists) within a 30-minute drive in every state except for Oklahoma for YAG (301 470 [7.6%]) and selective laser trabeculoplasty (371 097 [9.4%]). Patients had a longer travel time to receive all laser procedures from optometrists than ophthalmologists in Kentucky: the shortest median (IQR) drive time for an optometrist-performed procedure was 49.0 (18.4-71.7) minutes for YAG, and the the longest median (IQR) drive time for an ophthalmologist-performed procedure was 22.8 (12.1-41.4) minutes, also for YAG. The median (IQR) driving time for YAG in Oklahoma was 26.6 (12.2-56.9) for optometrists vs 22.0 (11.2-40.8) minutes for ophthalmologists, and in Arkansas it was 90.0 (16.2-93.2) for optometrists vs 26.5 (11.8-51.6) minutes for ophthalmologists. In Louisiana, the longest median (IQR) travel time to receive laser procedures from optometrists was for YAG at 18.5 (7.6-32.6) minutes and the shortest drive to receive procedures from ophthalmologists was for YAG at 20.5 (11.7-39.7) minutes. Conclusions and Relevance: Although this study did not assess impact on quality of care, expansion of laser eye surgery privileges to optometrists was not found to lead to shorter travel times to receive care or to a meaningful increase in the percentage of the population with nearby health care professionals.

Feasibility of providing collaborative glaucoma care from a community optometry perspective: a mixed-methods assessment.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Despite evidence showing that optometry-led collaborative glaucoma care can be delivered at reduced cost compared to ophthalmology-based care without compromising patient outcomes, such models of care are not widely practiced in Australia. Ensuring glaucoma patients have equitable access to effective and cost-effective care is a matter of public health importance. BACKGROUND: This study examined the feasibility and business case assessment for providing glaucoma care from a community optometry perspective. METHODS: Nine optometrists were interviewed in a semi-structured format, focusing on the economic feasibility, barriers, and benefits of collaborative glaucoma care. The Consolidated Framework for Intervention Research was used for thematic data analysis. Costs and revenues associated with providing glaucoma care were sourced from the literature and interviews. A business case model assessing the profitability of glaucoma care in optometric practice was developed. RESULTS: Thematic analysis revealed concerns over financial viability such that current Medicare Benefits Schedule fees are not sufficient to justify the cost of running a community optometry glaucoma clinic. All participants received a supplementary source of revenue. This finding was confirmed by the business case assessment. Inter-professional trust was perceived to be a key barrier to initiation of collaborative care however was able to be overcome quickly upon commencement of a collaborative care relationship. Optometrists perceived that collaborative care was beneficial to all involved, including patients, ophthalmologists, optometrists, and health payers. There was a perception of a growing divide between clinical and retail optometry, which was thought by most participants to be appropriate. CONCLUSION: This study is the first to explore the feasibility and business case for community-based optometrists to provide collaborative glaucoma care in Australia. Our findings show that current public funding is insufficient to justify the business case to private optometry practice, despite being perceived by optometrists as beneficial to all involved.

Changes in utilisation of optometry services with a non-targeted publicly-funded health care voucher system.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Understanding the impact of a health care voucher scheme and service access barriers could facilitate optometry service promotion to the older population. BACKGROUND: A voucher is one strategy to improve the utilisation of the different health care services available in the private sector. This study aims to explore how a health care voucher system for older people impacts utilisation of optometry services from the perspective of service users and service providers. METHODS: People aged 65 years or above were recruited to fill in a structured questionnaire studying the usage characteristics and access barriers of optometry services and the health care voucher. Views from the optometrists about the voucher scheme were collected by questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 1156 valid questionnaires from eligible voucher users was collected. Results showed that 53.7% (621/1156) of participants had used optometry services within the past 2 years. Lack of familiarity with services provided, professional fees, and prices of spectacles were the main barriers to using optometry services. Of those participants who had used the voucher for optometry services previously, 80.4% (284/353) had an eye examination in the past 2 years. Among 389 optometrists who participated in the study, over 80% agreed that the voucher scheme improved awareness of major eye conditions and access to prescription spectacles when necessary. CONCLUSION: The health care voucher for older people improved access to optometry services. Access could be further improved by increasing price transparency of professional services and prescription spectacles. Responses from optometry service providers supported the view that the voucher scheme improved access to, and utilisation of, preventive care services.

Demographics and distribution of the optometry profession in Australia: 2011 to 2019.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: An assessment of the total number, demographics and geographic distribution of optometrists in Australia may inform policy to address the maldistribution of the workforce. BACKGROUND: Concerns have been expressed about the growth of the optometry workforce in the context of, in the last decade, the establishment of four new optometry programs in addition to the three long-standing programs. METHODS: This paper analysed data obtained from the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency about registered optometrists during the period 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2019. The de-identified dataset included information about registered optometrists in Australia: their first year of registration, gender, year of birth (in five-year bands), optometry qualification, registration type including endorsement for therapeutic practice and the postcode of the principal place of practice. RESULTS: Data for 6,596 registrants were obtained over the study period during which the number of female optometrists increased significantly. The age profile of the profession shifted, with younger age bands becoming a significantly greater proportion of the profession. The majority of the profession comprised optometrists with a qualification from one of the three long-standing Australian optometry programs. Graduates of those programs accounted for 75.1% of registered optometrists in 2019, while 14.3% held a qualification from an overseas institution. The proportion of optometrists practising in major Australian cities was greater than the proportion of the population in those locations. A concomitant low proportion of optometrists, relative to population size, was found in regional and remote areas. CONCLUSION: Optometrists practising in Australia can be generalised as mostly female graduates of one of the three long-standing optometry programs holding general registration with a therapeutic endorsement, and with a principal place of practice located in a major Australian city. A significant maldistribution of the workforce was found that did not change significantly during the study period.

A Geographic Analysis of Google Characterizations of Who Is an "Eye Doctor" Across the US.

Importance: In order to continue to clarify and maintain their role as eye physicians and surgeons, ophthalmologists may want to understand how they are viewed in the public eye and online. Objective: To determine the representation of ophthalmologists (OMD) and optometrists (ODs) when a Google search for "eye doctor near me" is made from each county in the US. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based cross-sectional study used publicly available data on OMDs and ODs and a Google search application programming interface (API) to search the phrase "eye doctor near me" from the geographic coordinates of each county centroid in the US (searched June 30, 2021). The top 10 sites and 3 Google map links, excluding physician ratings sites, were recorded. Data from the US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services were used to estimate the real number of OMDs and ODs per county. Main Outcome and Measures: The primary outcome was the mean proportion of OMDs listed by Google search as compared with the real proportion of OMDs for the US overall and for each state and county. Results: A total of 2955 counties from 52 states and territories were included. The overall mean proportion of OMDs (OMDs with ODs) from the Google search of all counties was 4726.97 of 16 345.93 (28.91%), which was also less than the real proportion of ODs (15 778 of 41 975 [37.58%], a difference of 8.67%; 95% CI, 37.13-38.05%; P < .001). OMDs were underrepresented by Google in 35 of 52 states and territories (67.3%). Conclusions and Relevance: In most counties in the US, Google search of the phrase "eye doctor near me" may underrepresent ophthalmologists. Ophthalmologists may want to pursue search engine optimization to try to achieve balanced representation online.

An analysis of glaucoma repeat measures assessment results: Are core competencies enough?

PURPOSE: The need to validate core competency skills in qualified optometrists wishing to take part in extended roles in glaucoma care has been questioned. This analysis examines the ability of qualified optometrists to perform relevant core competency skills under standardised objective assessment conditions to explore whether such validation is justified. It also investigates if there are associations between performance, gender and length of time since qualification. METHODS: Anonymised data from the Cardiff University assessment programme for the Wales Optometry Postgraduate Education Centre (WOPEC) Local Optical Committee Support Unit glaucoma referral filtering and monitoring pathway delivered between January 2017 and March 2020 were analysed. Results were combined with demographic data from the General Optical Council register of optometrists in the UK to investigate associations between performance and practitioner characteristics, namely length of time since qualification and gender. RESULTS: The assessment results of 2215 optometrists practising in England (approximately 15% of all UK registered optometrists and 30% of all optometrists registered in England) were analysed. Failure rates for first time assessment in each of five objective structured clinical examination style practical assessments were 8.5% (van Herick); 8.8% (slit lamp binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy); 10.1% (Goldmann applanation tonometry calibration); 21.9% (Goldmann applanation tonometry) and 23.3% (case scenario interpretation and management). There were either no associations or at most very weak associations between performance and practitioner characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that these competencies are not universally present in optometrists practising in England and that ongoing training and assessment of these competencies is justified for entry into extended roles. There are no meaningful associations between performance in these assessments and gender or time since qualification.

Assessment of knowledge, attitude, and practice of glaucoma among different cadres of optometrists.

Purpose: To assess the level of knowledge, attitude, and clinical practice of glaucoma among optometry students and optometry practitioners with different years of clinical experience and academic background. Methods: A survey with 20 questions on knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) of glaucoma was prepared and self-administered to optometry students and optometry practitioners practicing in an eye hospital/clinic/optical with varied years of clinical experience and education qualification. Results: Among the 558 participants, 57% were optometry practitioners and 43% were students. The knowledge scores among optometry practitioners increased significantly with an increase in the years of clinical experience (P < 0.001). Participants with master's degrees scored higher than participants with bachelor's degrees (P = 0.12). There was no statistically significant difference in knowledge scores based on the type of clinical practice - hospital, private practice, or optical (P = 0.39). Practicing optometrists who performed slit-lamp examination, gonioscopy, IOP measurements, and disc evaluation for the detection of glaucoma had significantly higher knowledge scores than those who did not perform these tests in their practice (P < 0.05). A positive attitude toward glaucoma learning through workshops and hands-on training was reported by optometrists and students. Conclusion: Knowledge about glaucoma was good among optometrists and optometry students and was better among those who handled the diagnostics. All the optometrists had a positive attitude toward enhancing their practice through proper training.

Opioid Prescribing Patterns of Optometrists in the Medicare Part D Database.

SIGNIFICANCE: This study aimed to determine the prescription rates and prescribing trends of opioids by optometrists in the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) part D database from 2013 to 2017 and to assess opioid prescribing patterns of U.S. optometrists in the CMS part D database. METHODS: With internal review board approval, a retrospective observational cohort study was conducted on optometrists listed in the CMS part D database who prescribed opioids from 2013 to 2017. RESULTS: There was an average of 26,477 optometrists in the CMS database from 2013 to 2017, of which 5.9% prescribed opioids. Of those prescribing opioids, optometrists wrote an average of 5.9 opioid prescriptions per year. Those writing greater than 10 opioid prescriptions averaged 24.2 annually. Overall, of opioid prescribing optometrists, opioid prescriptions comprised 7% of prescriptions written per year. CONCLUSIONS: Most optometrists do not prescribe opioids, and the vast majority of those who do write few opioid prescriptions. The total number of optometrists prescribing opioids and the total number of opioid prescriptions declined from 2013 to 2017. Further investigation into the opioid prescribing practices by optometrists will help better understand specific pain needs, as opioid prescribing patterns may differ depending on patient population.

Attitudes of optometrists in the UK and Ireland to Digital Eye Strain and approaches to assessment and management.

PURPOSE: To investigate the attitudes and understanding of optometrists in the UK and Ireland towards Digital Eye Strain (DES), and to examine related practice patterns. METHODS: An anonymous online questionnaire was developed, covering attitude and understanding of DES, examination of patients who may be experiencing DES and approaches to management options. The questionnaire was promoted to UK and Ireland optometrists via professional bodies and local and area optometric committees. RESULTS: 406 responses were included in the analysis. Most respondents agreed that DES was an important concern for optometrists (88.9%). 91.4% reported they felt confident in discussing possible symptoms of DES and management options; this was weakly and negatively associated with number of years qualified (rs  = -0.198, p ≤ 0.001). Estimations of the proportion of patients affected by DES were lower than reports in the literature (median 25%, IQR 10%-50%). Most respondents always (60.6%) or frequently (21.9%) inquired about device usage in routine case history taking, and also asked follow-up questions, although 29.3% only asked about the presence of symptoms half the time or less. Advising on regular breaks (84.0%), lubricants (55.7%) and environment/set up (69.2%) were felt to be extremely or very important by most respondents. Advising on specialist spectacle lenses, specifically blue filtering designs, was considered extremely or very important by 34.2% and 15.2%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Given the agreement that DES is a significant issue causing frequent and persistent symptoms, and practitioners reported high levels of confidence in discussing DES, patients can expect to receive advice on symptoms and management from their optometrist. Simple management strategies were felt to be most important to advise on, with more uncertainty linked to specialist spectacle lenses.

2017 National Optometry Workforce Survey.

SIGNIFICANCE: Planning for the effective delivery of eye care, on all levels, depends on an accurate and detailed knowledge of the optometric workforce and an understanding of demographic/behavioral trends to meet future needs of the public. PURPOSE: The purposes of this study were to assess the current and future supply of doctors of optometry and to examine in-depth trends related to (1) demographic shifts, (2) sex-based differences, (3) differences in practice behaviors in between self-employed and employed optometrists, and (4) the concept of additional capacity within the profession. METHODS: The 2017 National Optometry Workforce Survey (31 items) was distributed to 4050 optometrists, randomly sampled from a population of 45,033 currently licensed and practicing optometrists listed in the American Optometric Association's Optometry Master Data File. A stratified sampling method was applied to the population of optometrists using primary license state, age, and sex as variables to ensure a representative sample. RESULTS: With a response rate of 29% (1158 responses), the sample ensured a 95% confidence interval with a margin of error of <5%. Key results include finding no significant differences between men and women for hours worked (38.9 vs. 37.5), productivity (patient visits per hour, 2.0 vs. 1.9), or career options/professional growth satisfaction with 65% for both. The data indicate a likely range of additional patient capacity of 2.29 to 2.57 patients per week (5.05 to 5.65 million annually profession-wide). CONCLUSIONS: The optometric workforce for the next decade is projected to grow 0.6 to 0.7% more annually than the U.S. population. The study found additional capacity for the profession more limited than previously suggested. Findings also illustrate an evolving/equitable workforce based on sex, in terms of both productivity and satisfaction. The trend toward employed versus self-employed was marked with 44% reporting they are employed, up from 29% in 2012.

Demographics and distribution of new entrants to the optometry profession in Australia.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: An assessment of the total number, demographics and geographic distribution of new entrants to the optometry profession in Australia can assist planning for workforce requirements. BACKGROUND: Over the past decade, the number of registered optometrists in Australia has increased by 30.1 per cent, a rate that is greater than the population growth of the country (12.1 per cent). Concerns have been expressed about the size of the optometry workforce in a context of increasing numbers of graduating optometrists. This paper analyses data obtained from the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA) about new entrants to the profession and their initial practice location during the period 1 July 2010 to 30 June 2018. METHODS: A de-identified dataset was obtained from AHPRA that revealed the following characteristics of new entrants: qualification, gender, year of birth (in five-year bands), registration type, registration endorsement and principal place of practice including its Remoteness Area classification. RESULTS: Data for 1,680 entrants were eligible for analysis; 80 per cent graduated from an Australian university, 12 per cent graduated from the optometry program in New Zealand, and seven per cent were graduates of an overseas university. The remaining two per cent registered via the Trans-Tasman Mutual Recognition Agreement, although the dataset did not include the qualification. The United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland provided the majority of overseas entrants (60 per cent). Most (75 per cent) entrants commenced practice in a major Australian city. Graduates of Australian universities tended to commence practice in the state in which they trained or an adjacent state or territory. Juxtaposed on the data outlined above is the high proportion (42 per cent) of overseas-trained optometrists commencing practice in Western Australia. CONCLUSION: Coincident with the newer optometry programs producing graduates is the increased number of optometrists entering the Australian workforce over the past decade, with the majority commencing practice in major cities. Australia-trained optometrists tend to commence practice in the state where their training was undertaken. New entrants to the optometry profession can be generalised as graduates of an Australian optometry program, female, aged in their early-mid 20s and qualified for therapeutic practice.

Evaluating the cost and wait-times of a task-sharing model of care for diabetic eye care: a case study from Australia.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether a collaborative model of care that uses task-sharing for the management of low-risk diabetic retinopathy, Community Eye Care (C-EYE-C), can improve access to care and better use resources, compared with hospital-based care. DESIGN: Retrospective audit of medical and financial records to compare two models of care. SETTING: A large, urban tertiary Australian publicly funded hospital. INTERVENTION: C-EYE-C is a collaborative care model, involving community-based optometrist assessment and 'virtual review' by ophthalmologists to manage low-risk patients. The C-EYE-C model of care was implemented from January to October 2017. PARTICIPANTS: New low-risk patient referrals with diabetes received at a tertiary hospital ophthalmology unit. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Historical standard hospital care was compared with C-EYE-C for attendance, wait-times, outcomes and costs. Clinical concordance between the optometrist and ophthalmologist diagnosis and management was assessed using weighted kappa statistic. RESULTS: There were 133 new low-risk referrals, managed in standard hospital care (n=68) and C-EYE-C (n=65). Attendance rates were similar between the models of care (72.1% hospital vs 67.7% C-EYE-C, p=0.71). C-EYE-C had shorter appointment wait-time (53 vs 118 days, p<0.01). In the C-EYE-C model of care, 68.2% of patients did not require hospital appointments and costs were 43% less than hospital care. There was substantial agreement between optometrists and ophthalmologists for diagnosis (κ=0.64, CI 0.47-0.81) and management (κ=0.66, CI 0.45-0.87). CONCLUSION: This Australian study showed that collaborative eye care resulted in reduced patient waiting times and considerable cost-savings, while maintaining a high standard of patient care compared with traditional hospital-based care in the management of low-risk hospital referrals with diabetic eye disease. The improved access and reduced costs were largely the result of better task allocation through greater utilisation of primary eye care professionals to provide services for low-risk patients. Better resource use may free up further resources for other eye care services.

Assessment of optometrists' knowledge, skills and practice on cataract: a cross-sectional study from Kisumu County, Western Kenya.

BACKGROUND: The quality of life can be impacted negatively by blindness arising from cataract. The total prevalence of blindness in Kenya is estimated at 0.7%, however cataract contributes almost half (43%) of the total blindness in Kenya. Optometrists are well placed to assess and refer cataract patients. However, little is known on optometrists' skills, practice and knowledge. Therefore, this study was designed to assess optometrists' knowledge, skill and practice on cataract in Kisumu, Kenya. METHODS: A cross-sectional study design was used. The study was conducted from June 2019 to August 219 using self-administered questionnaire. Basic socio-demographic characteristics were collected and participants' knowledge, skills and practice on cataract were investigated. The primary outcome measure was the proportions of participants who identified the questions related to knowledge, skills and practice on cataract. Chi-square analysis was performed to assess the association between demographic characteristics of participants with practice, knowledge and skills. RESULTS: A total of 49 optometrists with a mean age of 30.4 years and mean duration of practice of 1-10 years were interviewed. Most optometrists had good knowledge on various aspects of cataract. For example (98%) had a good knowledge on the types of cataract. Almost three quarter (75.5%) of the optometrists reported that they could diagnose cataract correctly based on skills. However, half (57.1%) of the optometrists could not identify nuclear cataract. Being a self reported practice and not an observed practice, most optometrists (61.2%) reported that they did not screen patients aged 40 years and above for cataract. Almost half (52.6%) of the optometrists reported that they did a routine eye examination however, they could not justify the significance of examining the crystalline lens for patient above 40 years. CONCLUSION: The study established that despite the good level of knowledge among optometrist on cataract, there exist a gap on skills and practice. The results of this study calls for more clinical based activities among optometrists. This will eases diagnosis of cataract and its management with an aim to reduce the burden in Kenya.

Eye Care Provider Availability for the Medicare Population in U.S. States That Have Expanded Optometrist Scope of Practice.

SIGNIFICANCE: Estimating a broader set of measures of local eye care provider availability than used in prior research offers information that is useful for policy decisions related to access to eye care. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine whether policy-relevant information was gained when measures of local eye care provider availability in addition to the estimated travel time (ETT) to the closest provider were estimated for the population 65 years or older in Kentucky, New Mexico, and Oklahoma. These states have expanded surgical scope of practice for optometrists. METHODS: This study used block group-level population data from the 2010 U.S. Decennial Census and eye care provider office address information from the 2016 Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data. Geographic information system analysis was used to calculate ETTs between individuals and eye care providers. Expanded measures of availability included the difference in ETT to an individual's second closest and closest ophthalmologist, the difference in ETT to an individual's closest ophthalmologist and closest optometrist, and whether only one ophthalmologist at the closest office accepted Medicare. Descriptive statistics were calculated for each state and by urbanicity. RESULTS: Of the population 65 years or older in each state, between 10.8 (Kentucky) and 16.6% (Oklahoma) had a one-way ETT to the second closest ophthalmologist >15 minutes longer than to the closest ophthalmologist, between 21.1 (Kentucky) and 27.6% (Oklahoma) had a one-way ETT to the closest ophthalmologist >15 minutes longer than to the closest optometrist, and between 56.4 (Kentucky) and 70.0% (Oklahoma) had only one ophthalmologist at the closest office who accepted Medicare. Findings differed substantially by urbanicity. CONCLUSIONS: Using a portfolio of travel time-based measures enhances the understanding of local eye care provider availability.