Hyperostosis frontalis interna in female historic skeletal populations: Age, sex hormones and the impact of industrialization.

OBJECTIVES: This analysis aims to investigate the impact of industrialization on the prevalence of Hyperostosis Frontalis Interna (HFI), focusing on the roles of age and parity to examine the claim that longevity and changing reproductive patterns have led to increased rates in modern populations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 138 individuals from two documented London skeletal assemblages of the Industrial period were analyzed employing macroscopic observation, digital radiography and MicroCT scanning to establish the prevalence rates of HFI according to modern clinical standards. Statistical analysis was also undertaken on a sub-sample of 51 females of post-menopausal age to identify any relationship between parity and HFI. RESULTS: The majority of cases of HFI were found in older females, reflecting clinical observations. The prevalence rates of HFI corresponded well to those predicted from the proportion of old age females present within populations. Age was therefore shown to be a predominant factor in HFI presence. A plateau in HFI prevalence was noted from the age of 50-59 years onwards. No statistically significant relationship was found between parity and HFI. DISCUSSION: When recorded consistently, HFI was positively correlated with age and longevity but had also increased among old age females over time. Our results suggest that nulliparity co-occurs with HFI but is not a primary factor in its pathogenesis. Key factors in HFI presence in females are likely to be increased androgens and the dysregulation of insulin and insulin-like growth factor-1.

Objective Assessment of the Interfrontal Angle for Severity Grading and Operative Decision-Making in Metopic Synostosis.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of a previously validated interfrontal angle for classification of severity of metopic synostosis and as an aid to operative decision-making. METHODS: An expert panel was asked to study 30 cases ranging from minor to severe metopic synostosis. Based on computed tomographic images of the skull and clinical photographs, they classified the severity of trigonocephaly (1 = normal, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, and 4 = severe) and management (0 = nonoperative and 1 = operative). The severity scores and management reported by experts were then pooled and matched with the interfrontal angle computed from each respective computed tomographic scan. A threshold was identified at which most experts agree on operative management. RESULTS: Expert severity scores were higher for more acute interfrontal angles. There was a high concordance at the extremes of classifications, severe (4) and normal (1) (p < 0.0001); however, between interfrontal angles of 114.3 and 136.1 degrees, there exists a "gray zone," with severe discordance in expert rankings. An operative threshold of 118.2 degrees was identified, with the interfrontal angle able to predict the expert panel's decision to proceed with surgery 87.6 percent of the time. CONCLUSIONS: The interfrontal angle has been previously validated as a simple, accurate, and reproducible means for diagnosing trigonocephaly, but must be obtained from computed tomographic data. In this article, the authors demonstrate that the interfrontal angle can be used to further characterize the severity of trigonocephaly. It also correlated with expert decision-making for operative versus nonoperative management. This tool may be used as an adjunct to clinical decision-making when the decision to proceed with surgery may not be straightforward. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic, V.

The metopic angle: a novel assessment tool of the trigonocephalic frontal deformity and its correction.

While metopic synostosis is typically a straightforward clinical diagnosis, there is no standard objective measurement that can be easily used in the preoperative evaluation and in the subsequent postoperative follow-up. Despite the fact that multiple methods have been previously described, they either lack well-defined landmark points, do not specifically address the frontal vault deformity, or are too cumbersome to be used routinely for clinical applications. We describe the metopic angle as an objective and dependable method for evaluation of the frontal vault contour.Using the STARscanner Laser Data Acquisition System, a portable, noninvasive diagnostic modality, the metopic angle was defined. This angle was used to track postoperative changes and was compared with preoperative values in patients who underwent minimally invasive strip craniectomy for metopic synostosis. To further ensure its validity, the angle was also measured in age-matched control subjects.The metopic angle changed from a preoperative value of 104.9 degrees to 111.3 degrees at 3 months (P = 1.59E-06) and to 114.9 at 1 year postoperatively (P = 2.51E-09) in patients who underwent endoscopic-assisted strip craniectomies for metopic synostosis. The resulting postoperative values were comparable to those obtained in age-matched control subjects with normal cranial vaults.The metopic angle measurement is a rapid, noninvasive, reproducible method for objective measurement of both preoperative deformity and postoperative correction of the frontal bone contour in metopic synostosis.

Percentile-based assessment of craniosynostosis.

Perioperative assessment of craniosynostosis is based mostly on subjective scores. In this study, we sought to find an objective method to assess cranial deformation based on normative craniofacial percentiles. Anthropometric datasets from 104 (79 males, 25 females) patients with craniosynostoses were included. Anthropometric data were compared with normative age-dependent percentiles. Deviations above the 90th or below the 10th percentile were defined as significant cranial deformation. The cohort comprised 69 children with sagittal, 22 metopic, nine coronal, two bicoronal, one lambdoid, and one with coronal + lambdoid craniosynostosis. Most children with sagittal synostosis were above the 90th percentile for cranial circumference and length, whereas only 27.9% were below the 10th percentile for cranial width. Most (83%) children with scaphocephaly had cranial indices below the 10th percentile. For trigonocephaly, we found normal cranial circumference values in most patients (10th-90th percentile), 40.9% were above the 90th percentile for cranial length, and 63.1% and 57.9% were above the 90th percentiles for sagittal and transverse circumferences. For unicoronal synostosis transverse circumference was above the 90th percentile in 83.3% of children. Matching of anthropometric data of craniosynostosis patients with craniofacial norms could be useful in grading the clinical picture and potentially adapting the operative procedure.

Frontal meningioma incidentally detected in the routine preoperative assessment of tongue cancer: a case report and literature review.

Recent advances in diagnostic tools, such as computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), have provided clinicians with the opportunity to detect asymptomatic meningiomas. This report describes a case of frontal convexity meningioma detected incidentally at MRI during the preoperative assessment of tongue cancer. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this case report is the first regarding the successful treatment of tongue cancer in a patient with incidental meningioma. The incidence, perioperative management, and various imaging tests to detect meningiomas are discussed, with a review of the literature.

Accuracy of photographic assessment compared with standard anthropometric measurements in nonsynostotic cranial deformities.

OBJECTIVE: Anthropometric landmarks of the skull have traditionally been used to describe cranial deformities resulting from nonsynostotic plagiocephaly or brachycephaly. Recently, digital photography has become an important tool for characterizing facial and cranial pathologies. The purpose of this study was to compare standard anthropometric cranial measurements with measurements taken from cranial photographs. PATIENTS: Standardized digital images in the supracranial view and cranial anthropometric measurements were obtained from 122 children between the ages of 3 and 15 months. The photographs were assessed using Quick Ceph® software. The cephalic index and cranial vault asymmetry index were used to indicate the degree of cranial deformity. Children were classified into plagiocephaly, brachycephaly, and the combination of both. To determine interobserver variability, two clinicians separately measured the cephalic index and cranial vault asymmetry index from digital photographs in 70 infants of the plagiocephalic group. RESULTS: To compare interassay reliability for these methods of obtaining the cephalic index and cranial vault asymmetry index, the differences between photographically and anthropometrically derived values were plotted against anthropometrically derived values alone (Bland-Altman plots). The photographic method satisfied the limits of agreement (cephalic index, 7.51%; cranial vault asymmetry index, 6.57%) and showed slightly lower values represented by the respective bias (cephalic index, 1.79%; cranial vault asymmetry index, 3.03%). Comparison between observers revealed excellent agreement, detected by the intraclass correlation coefficient of .982 for the cephalic index and .946 for the cranial vault asymmetry index. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that digital photography is a reliable tool for quantifying cranial deformities. Furthermore, it is rapid, noninvasive, and reproducible. However, we continue to use both methods in clinical practice.

Less-lethal hybrid ammunition wounds: a forensic assessment introducing bullet-skin-bone entity.

Agencies all around the world now use less-lethal weapons with homogeneous missiles such as bean bag or rubber bullets. Contusions and sometimes significant morbidity have been reported. This study focuses on wounds caused by hybrid ammunition with the pathologists' flap-by-flap procedure. Twenty-four postmortem human subjects were used, and lesions caused on frontal, temporal, sternal, and left tibial regions by a 40-mm hybrid ammunition (33 g weight) were evaluated on various distance range. The 50% risk of fractures occurred at 79.2 m/sec on the forehead, 72.9 m/sec on the temporal, 72.5 m/sec on the sternum, and 76.7 m/sec on the tibia. Skin lesions were not predictors of bone fracture. There was no correlation between soft and bone tissue observed lesions and impact velocity (correlated to distance range). Lesions observed with hybrid ammunition were the result of bullet-skin-bone entity as the interaction of the projectile on skin and bone tissues.

Quantitative and qualitative assessment of morphology in sagittal synostosis: mid-sagittal vector analysis.

Consensus remains lacking regarding the optimal surgical treatment modality for sagittal synostosis. There is, however, wide agreement that objective analytical methods are required to demonstrate the characteristic morphology of the condition and to substantiate the benefits of specified surgical techniques. Simple calculated anthropomorphic indices, such as the cranial index, are commonly used but fail to provide satisfactory representation of morphology, which is far more complex than can be represented by its simple length-width ratio. Techniques to provide more comprehensive, yet practical, assessment of morphology are needed for analytic purposes. Herein, we introduce vector analysis as an objective, computed tomography (CT)-based morphometric technique for assessment of cranial morphology; this work represents the first application of the technique mid-sagittal vector analysis (MSVA). MSVA is a single plane application that was devised to address dysmorphology in sagittal synostosis. It was our hypothesis that MSVA would quantitatively and qualitatively depict preoperative morphology and postoperative correction in specific regions. Sixteen patients undergoing cranial reshaping surgery for sagittal synostosis were included in the study. All patients underwent routine preoperative and 1 year postoperative CT scans, from which the MSVA was derived. MSVA is a radial vector analysis in which distances to the cranial surface are measured from a single reference point origin in the sagittal plane. Preoperative morphology, characterized by respective vectors, was analyzed in three regions: the frontal, vertex, and occipital regions. Comparison with postoperative paired data was conducted for each patient. The analysis of postoperative change demonstrated (1) decrease in prominence in the frontal and occipital regions, (2) increase in height and forward translation of the vertex, and (3) ability to distinguish and qualify frontal versus occipital bossing and correction thereof. We conclude that the longitudinal differences associated with scaphocephaly are well characterized and differentiated by MSVA. Quantitative and qualitative assessment identifies three relevant regions affected by the condition and its treatment: the frontal, vertex, and occipital regions. The transverse dimension is not addressed in this single plane analysis; a more comprehensive application will require additional planes of analysis and the development of a normative database.

[Radiologic assessment of suspected orbital fracture]. / Radiologische Abklärung bei Verdacht auf Orbitafraktur.

In suspicion of orbital fractures plain X-ray of the skull in half axial view are recommended. To be sure of this diagnosis one need to do examinations in high resolution computed tomography, axial and coronal view, in order to demonstrate the total extension of the fracture and lesions of the soft tissue of the orbit and of the surrounded areas. Magnetic resonance tomography is helpful in demonstrating fat and muscles around or in the fractures. There is no need to do other projections of plain skull X-rays except there is no computed tomography available.

Trigonocephaly: clinical and cephalometric assessment of craniofacial morphology in operated and nontreated patients.

Craniofacial parameters were studied clinically and by cephalometry in 11 trigonocephalic patients from infancy to 4 years of age. Six of the most severe patients had surgery between 6 and 18 months of age. Analysis of morphology indicated that bony interorbital distance was reduced in patients selected for surgery and hypotelorism persisted at final examination. All patients demonstrated orbital width measurements above the mean for the norm, while orbital height was essentially normal. All but one of the patients had a variably prominent forehead bony ridge that was eliminated or reduced as a result of surgery and/or growth. However, the forehead of most patients, whether operated or not, was too narrow when compared to normal skulls. Thus, although some of the striking features of trigonocephaly are eliminated, minor characteristics of the anomaly still persevere at 4 years of age.