Cost Comparison of Kirschner Wire Versus Intramedullary Screw Fixation of Metacarpal and Phalangeal Fractures.

BACKGROUND: Intramedullary screw fixation is a relatively new technique for fixation of metacarpal and phalangeal fractures. The objective of this study was to compare health care-associated costs and outcomes for intramedullary screw versus Kirschner wire (K-wire) fixation of hand fractures. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients undergoing intramedullary screw fixation of hand fractures at a single center during 2016-2019 inclusive was conducted. Health care-associated costs were compared with age-matched and fracture pattern-matched controls who underwent K-wire fixation. RESULTS: Fifty patients met the study inclusion criteria, incorporating 62 fractures (29 K-wire, 33 intramedullary screw fixation). The median age was 34.6 years (18.0-90.1 years). There was no significant difference in primary operative costs (£1130.4 ± £162.7 for K-wire vs £1087.0 ± £104.2 for intramedullary screw), outpatient follow-up costs (£958.7 ± £149.4 for K-wire vs £782.4 ± £143.8 for intramedullary screw), or total health care-associated costs (£2089.1 ± £209.0 for K-wire vs £1869.4 ± £195.3 for intramedullary screw). However, follow-up costs were significantly lower for the uncomplicated intramedullary screw cohort (£847.1 ± £109.1 for K-wire vs £657.5 ± £130.8 for intramedullary screw, P = .05). Subgroup analysis also revealed that overall costs were significantly higher for buried K-wire techniques. Complication rates, time to return to active work, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores were similar. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified significantly lower outpatient follow-up costs for uncomplicated intramedullary screw fixation of hand fractures compared with K-wires, along with a trend toward lower overall health care-associated costs. In addition, buried K-wire techniques were also found to carry a significantly higher financial burden. Higher powered prospective studies are required to determine indirect costs.

Gamification in rehabilitation of metacarpal fracture using cost-effective end-user device: A randomized controlled trial.

STUDY DESIGN: This is a two-group randomized controlled trial. INTRODUCTION: Finger stiffness after treatment for metacarpal fractures often occurs due to poor compliance to the conventional rehabilitation programs. Gamification has shown success in improving adherence to and effectiveness of various therapies. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether gamification, using cost-effective devices was comparable with conventional physiotherapy in improving hand functions and adherence to rehabilitation in metacarpal fractures. METHODS: A 2-group randomized controlled trial involving 19 patients was conducted. Participants were randomized to a control (conventional physiotherapy, n = 10) or interventional group (gamification, n = 9). The grips strength and composite finger range of motion were measured at the baseline and each follow-up together with Patient-Rated Wrist and Hand Evaluation scores and compliance. RESULTS: There were no significant differences on improvements of grip strength (means difference 24.38 vs 20.44, P = .289) and composite finger range of motion (means difference 50.50 vs 51.11, P = .886). However, the gamification group showed better results in Patient-Rated Wrist and Hand Evaluation (mean 0.44 vs 8.45, P = .038) and compliance (P < .05). No adverse events were reported. DISCUSSION: Our results suggest that gamification using a cost-effective device demonstrated similar effectiveness as conventional physiotherapy in post-metacarpal fracture rehabilitation. CONCLUSIONS: Gamification using a mobile device is an inexpensive and safe alternative to conventional physiotherapy for hand rehabilitation after metacarpal fractures. It effectively serves as a guide for future development of cost-effective technology-enhanced therapy.

Radiographic and Clinical Assessment of Intramedullary Nail Fixation for the Treatment of Unstable Metacarpal Fractures.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the article was to evaluate clinical and radiographic outcomes in a case series of unstable metacarpal fractures treated with flexible intramedullary nail (IMN) fixation. METHODS: A total of 55 patients with unstable metacarpal fractures between 2003 and 2010 were treated with IMN fixation and followed for a minimum of 1 year. The outcomes were assessed via a radiological study of longitudinal and angular collapse, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, total active range of motion (ROM) of the wrist, and grip strength testing. RESULTS: In the 55 patients, metacarpal fractures were healed by clinical and radiographic assessment at an average of 12.7 weeks. IMNs were removed in all cases at an average of 13.9 weeks. Patients regained full finger ROM at the final follow-up and were capable of 72.4% of motion at 2 weeks postoperatively. The mean DASH score at the final follow-up was 6.5. Complications included 3 cases of extensor tendon irritation that resolved without functional impairment and 2 cases of "backing out" that required reoperation to replace the pin. In one case, a bony exostosis formed on the affected metacarpal that led to tendon irritation and required operative excision. CONCLUSIONS: We found that this technique allowed for the stabilization of fractures, early ROM, resumption of usual activities, reduced immobilization, and minimal complications. A removable orthosis, instead of a cast, allowed for earlier mobilization of the wrist, metacarpophalangeal, and proximal interphalangeal joints.

Cost and Complications of Percutaneous Fixation of Hand Fractures in a Procedure Room Versus the Operating Room.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare closed reduction and percutaneous pinning of metacarpal and phalanx fractures performed in the operating room (OR) versus the procedure room of the emergency department with primary outcomes being infection rate, radiographic union, and monetary cost. METHODS: From January 2006 to December 2010, all closed reduction and percutaneous pinnings of metacarpal and phalanx fractures (CPT codes: 26608; 26727) by a single board-certified hand surgeon (A.M.H.) were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were placed into 2 groups: Group 1 was patients treated in the OR, and group 2 was patients in an emergency department procedure room. Infection, malunion, and nonunion rates were compared using a chi-square test. Charges were compared using a t-test, and cost of supplies and labor was evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 189 patients met final inclusion criteria for this study: 130 in group 1 and 59 in group 2. There was no statistically significant difference in infection rates ( P = .13), nonunion ( P = .40), malunion rates ( P = .89), and hardware failure with revision ( P = .94) between the 2 groups. The procedure room patients had an average hospital charge of $1358.55 compared with $3691.85 for OR-treated patients (P = .001). The total cost of supplies and nonphysician labor was $432.31 per OR case and $179.59 per procedure room case. CONCLUSIONS: Metacarpal and phalanx fractures of the hand amendable to closed reduction and percutaneous pinning can be treated in the procedure room with no increase in risk of infection, malunion, or nonunion rates. In addition, these surgeries can be performed in a procedure room with lower cost and less charges to patients than in the operating room.

Anatomic Assessment of K-Wire Trajectory for Transverse Percutaneous Fixation of Small Finger Metacarpal Fractures: A Cadaveric Study.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this cadaveric study is to evaluate the trajectory of percutaneous transverse Kirschner wire (K-wire) placement for fifth metacarpal fractures relative to the sagittal profile of the fifth metacarpal in order to develop a targeting strategy for the treatment of fifth metacarpal fractures. METHODS: Using 12 unmatched fresh human upper limbs, we evaluated the trajectory of percutaneous transverse K-wire placement relative to the sagittal profile of the fifth metacarpal in order to develop a targeting strategy for treatment of fifth metacarpal fractures. The midpoint of the small and ring finger metacarpals in the sagittal plane was identified at 3 points. At each point, a K-wire was inserted from the small finger metacarpal into the midpoint of the ring finger metacarpal ("center-center" position). RESULTS: The angle of the transverse K-wire relative to the table needed to achieve a center-center position averaged 20.8°, 18.9°, and 16.7° for the proximal diaphysis, middiaphysis, and the collateral recess, respectively. Approximately 80% of transversely placed K-wires obtained purchase in the long finger metacarpal. CONCLUSIONS: These results can serve as a guide to help surgeons in the accurate placement of percutaneous K-wires for small finger metacarpal fractures and may aid in surgeon training.

Cost analysis of percutaneous fixation of hand fractures in the main operating room versus the ambulatory setting.

PURPOSE: To date, there have been no studies identifying the cost differential for performing closed reduction internal fixation (CRIF) of hand fractures in the operating room (OR) versus an ambulatory setting. Our goal was to analyse the cost and efficiency of performing CRIF in these two settings and to investigate current practice trends in Canada. METHODS: A detailed analysis of the costs involved both directly and indirectly in the CRIF of a hand fracture was conducted. Hospital records were used to calculate efficiency. A survey was distributed to practicing plastic surgeons across Canada regarding their current practice of managing hand fractures. RESULTS: In an eight-hour surgical block we are able to perform five CRIF in the OR versus eight in an ambulatory setting. The costs of performing a CRIF in the OR under local anaesthetic, not including surgeon compensation, is $461.27 Canadian (CAD) compared to $115.59 CAD in the ambulatory setting, a 299% increase. The use of a regional block increases the cost to $665.49 CAD, a 476% increase. The main barrier to performing CRIFs in an outpatient setting is the absence of equipment necessary to perform these cases effectively, based on survey results. CONCLUSION: The use of the OR for CRIF of hand fractures is associated with a significant increase in cost and hospital resources with decreased efficiency. For appropriately selected hand fractures, CRIF in an ambulatory setting is less costly and more efficient compared to the OR and resources should be allocated to facilitate CRIF in this setting.

Osteosynthesis using plates and screws after removing a limited area of the periosteum in order to reduce misclassified during radiological assessment metacarpal shaft fractures.

Hand fractures are one of the most common causes for presenting to the emergency room. Metacarpal fractures count about 18 to 44% of all hand fractures, and are most often standalone closed injuries, without misplacement, not needing operative treatment. We present a case in which osteosynthesis with plates and screws was used to reduce two metacarpal fractures in order to allow an early motion recovery, despite the fact that a small portion of the periosteum needed to be removed. The type of fractures were misclassified according to the radiological findings, therefore the correct diagnosis was established during surgery. The results according to the radiological aspects and to the DASH score were excellent with 95% function recovery at twelve months. In this case, the use of osteosynthesis with plates and screws led to a good fracture healing without any major complications. However, there are a series of complications related to this method that should be taken into consideration. Being misled by the radiological aspects of the fractures, the most certain way to classify a metacarpal shaft fracture is through exploratory surgery, even if in most of the cases the three radiological views are enough to establish the diagnosis. Abbreviations: DASH score = Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, TAM = Total Active Motion, MCP = metacarpal phalangeal joint, PIP = proximal inter phalangeal joint.

Repeat emergency room visits for hand and wrist injuries.

PURPOSE: To characterize patients with hand or wrist injuries presenting to our university-based emergency department (ED) after a previous evaluation by an outside ED. We hypothesized that a majority of these patients did not require emergent care, most arrived during working hours, and a disproportionate number were uninsured. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 3,047 orthopedic hand consults from 2002 to 2010. Patients were included if our ED was the patient's second ED evaluation within 30 days for the same complaint. Demographics, diagnosis, referral instructions from the initial institution, date and time of ED visit, treatment received, and insurance status were recorded. Clinical urgency was quantified on an ordinal scale. RESULTS: A total of 325 patients met the inclusion criteria. The most common diagnoses were distal radius and metacarpal fractures. There were 266 (82%) patients with nonurgent diagnoses. A junior-level orthopedic resident treated and discharged 97% of patients from the ED. Sixty-two percent of the patients were uninsured, 32% had Medicaid, and 6% had commercial insurance or Medicare. There was a disproportionate percentage of uninsured and Medicaid patients compared with the payer mix of our state, orthopedic department, and ED. Ninety percent of patients presented on weekdays, and 84% arrived between 6 am and 6 pm. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients who met our inclusion criteria presented to our ED during regular business hours. Most were uninsured and did not have a condition that warranted urgent or emergent evaluation and treatment. With limited resources, it is important that an appropriate follow-up plan from the initial ED be in place so that patients do not have to present to a second ED for the same problem. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic IV.

Assessment of volar angulation and shortening in 5th metacarpal neck fractures: an inter- and intra-observer validity and reliability study.

Four methods for measuring volar angulation in 5th metacarpal neck fractures were tested for validity and reliability. Mid-medullary canal measurement in the lateral view (method MC-90) has previously been proven valid in a cadaveric study, hence used as a reference to test validity of the latter three. These three yielded a significant different mean fracture angle compared with MC-90, with only minor enhancement in reliability. Therefore, none of these three methods is recommended as a better standard method than the MC-90, where reliability was found to be substantial (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.53-0.81). Two methods for measuring shortening in 5th metacarpal neck fractures were compared, and stipulation of shortening by drawing a line through the most distal point of the heads of the neighbouring 3rd and 4th metacarpals (method SH-Stip) is a simple method with excellent reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.81-0.96) for estimating shortening, requiring only radiological examination of the injured hand.

[Boxer's fracture: Cost evaluation orthopaedic or surgical treatment]. / Evaluation du coûit des fractures du col du cinquième métacarpien traitement orthopédique et chirurgical.

UNLABELLED: Many methods of treatment have been proposed for fractures of the neck of the fifth metacarpal ranging from early mobilization to various surgical techniques. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the functional results and the costs of closed as opposed to open treatment (Foucher's K-Wire technique). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study on all fractures without rotational deformity and with a palmar angulation less than 40 degrees C. Details of the patients, the fractures, functional results and the cost of management were analyzed. RESULTS: The functional results were similar between the two groups, but surgical treatment increased the cost of treatment to 1100 euros. CONCLUSIONS: We advocate the use of closed treatment for these fractures. The functional results are the same as with surgical management, but the costs are much reduced.