Cumulative incidence and risk factors for medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw during long-term prostate cancer management.

Bone-modifying agents (BMA) are extensively used in treating patients with prostate cancer with bone metastases. However, this increases the risk of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). The safety of long-term BMA administration in clinical practice remains unclear. We aimed to determine the cumulative incidence and risk factors of MRONJ. One hundred and seventy-nine patients with prostate cancer with bone metastases treated with BMA at our institution since 2008 were included in this study. Twenty-seven patients (15%) had MRONJ during the follow-up period (median, 19 months; interquartile range, 9-43 months). The 2-year, 5-year, and 10-year cumulative MRONJ incidence rates were 18%, 27%, and 61%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified denosumab use as a risk factor for MRONJ, compared with zoledronic acid use (HR 4.64, 95% CI 1.93-11.1). Additionally, BMA use at longer than one-month intervals was associated with a lower risk of MRONJ (HR 0.08, 95% CI 0.01-0.64). Furthermore, six or more bone metastases (HR 3.65, 95% CI 1.13-11.7) and diabetes mellitus (HR 5.07, 95% CI 1.68-15.2) were risk factors for stage 2 or more severe MRONJ. MRONJ should be considered during long-term BMA administration in prostate cancer patients with bone metastases.

Quantitative Segmentation Analysis of the Radiological Changes by Using ITK-SNAP: Risk Assessment of the Severity and Recurrence of Medication-related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw.

Background and purpose: Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) severely impairs patients' quality of life and is remarkably refractory to treatment. There are lots of studies about identification of the radiographic features of MRONJ, yet reports about quantitative radiographic analysis for the risk assessment of the severity and recurrence of MRONJ are rarely heard. The aim of this study was to investigate the volumes of osteolytic lesions and radiodensity values of osteosclerotic lesions in MRONJ patients by using ITK-SNAP for severity prediction and prognosis evaluation. Materials and methods: Of 78 MRONJ patients (78 lesions) involved in this retrospective study, 53 were presented as osteolytic lesions and 25 were presented as osteosclerotic changes alone. Comprehensive CBCT images, demographics and clinical data of patients were investigated. The volumetric analysis and radiodensity measurement were performed by ITK-SNAP. SPSS 25.0 were used for statistical analysis. Results: The osteolytic lesion volumes in MRONJ patients receiving intravenous bisphosphonates (P=0.004) and patients without osteoporosis (P=0.027) were significantly large. No significant correlation between the volumes and bisphosphonates duration was found (P=0.094). The radiodensity values of osteosclerotic lesions was significantly correlated with bisphosphonates duration (P=0.040). The surrounding area of post-surgical lesions in MRONJ patients with recurrence showed significantly great radiodensity values (P=0.025). No significant correlation between the radiodensity values and the transformation from osteosclerotic lesions to osteolytic lesions was observed (P=0.507). Conclusion: MRONJ patients receiving intravenous bisphosphonates develop into large volumes of osteolytic lesions more easily. Long-term bisphosphonates duration is possibly related with higher bone density of osteosclerotic lesions, while higher density is not associated with the transformation from osteosclerotic lesions to osteolytic lesions. A rise of bone mineral density nearby post-surgical lesions is probably a predictor for MRONJ recurrence.

A New Medical Record Proposal to the Prognostic Risk Assessment for MRONJ in Oncologic Patients: "Sapienza Head and Neck Unit" Proposal.

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is an adverse event associated with antiresorptive and antiangiogenic drugs. The use of these drugs in the treatment of cancer patients with bone metastasis is necessary and standardized in the literature. A multidisciplinary approach for the patient's management is strongly recommended. Therefore, it should be necessary to integrate the path of these subjects with a dedicated dental screening in order to first assess the individual risk of developing a MRONJ, and then to plan dental treatments and oral hygiene sessions, and finally to schedule a follow-up to intercept and treat early osteonecrosis. The aim of this manuscript is to propose a new simple medical report to evaluate patients affected by metastatic bone cancer in order to reduce the risk of developing MRONJ.

Risk of Jaw Osteonecrosis After Intravenous Bisphosphonates in Cancer Patients and Patients Without Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the risk of jaw osteonecrosis after intravenous (IV) bisphosphonate administered to patients with cancer vs patients without cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of a 5% national sample of Medicare patients administered IV bisphosphonate from January 1, 2008, through December 31, 2013, for cancer vs noncancer indications. Probable jaw osteonecrosis was estimated with an algorithm including diagnoses, surgical procedures, and imaging studies. A non-IV bisphosphonate comparison group included patients prescribed an oral bisphosphonate for 30 days or less. RESULTS: During follow-up, 40 (0.42%) out of 9482 patients with cancer developed probable jaw osteonecrosis compared with 8 (0.05%) out of 16,046 patients without cancer. In a Cox multivariable survival analysis controlling for patient characteristics and number of IV zoledronic infusions, patients without cancer had a hazard ratio of 0.17 (95% CI, 0.06-0.46) for developing jaw osteonecrosis compared with those with cancer. The lower rate of jaw osteonecrosis in patients without cancer was also confirmed in a number of sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: The low rate of jaw osteonecrosis in patients with osteoporosis who receive IV bisphosphonate should be weighed against the benefit of those agents in preventing hip and other fractures.

Retrospective Audit: Does Prior Assessment by Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons Reduce the Risk of Osteonecrosis of The Jaw in Patients Receiving Bone-Targeted Therapies for Metastatic Cancers to the Skeleton?--Part II.

Men who receive bone-targeted therapy for metastatic prostate cancer are at increased risk of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ). Development of ONJ has been associated with the administration of bone-targeted therapies in association with other risk factors. ONJ can be distressing for a patient because it can cause pain, risk of jaw fracture, body image disturbance, difficultly eating, and difficulty maintaining good oral hygiene. The aim of this article is to report results of an audit of prior assessment by oral and maxillofacial surgeons (OMFS) before initiation of bone-targeted therapies and whether it may reduce the risk of ONJ in patients receiving bone-targeted therapies for advanced cancers.

Oncologists awareness about bisphosphonate related osteonecrosis of the jaws.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the oncologists thoughts about the positive and adverse effects of bisphosphonates, drug holiday and the awareness about BRONJ. METHODS: A written questionnaire was sent to 7 hospitals, which have oncology facilities in Ankara, Turkey. Results were evaluated as percentages. Chi Square and Kruskal Wallis H test was used to analyze the data. RESULTS: A total of 53 oncologists replied to the questionnaire. BRONJ is the most seen complication (66%) due to bisphosphonates usage. Temporary suspension of the drug (52.8%) is the best treatment choice for this complication. Oncologists usually prefered dentist consultatation (39.6%). CONCLUSIONS: A good cooperation of oncologists and dentists is very important to prevent BRONJ.

The increase in prescriptions of bisphosphonates and the incidence proportion of osteonecrosis of the jaw after risk communication activities in Japan: a hospital-based cohort study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of risk communication about bisphosphonate (BP)-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) on the number of reported cases to the Drug Adverse Reactions Reporting System and on the incidence proportion of ONJ in a hospital-based cohort study in Japan. METHOD: We conducted a survey of the safety information on BP-related ONJ available from regulatory authorities, pharmaceutical manufacturers and academic associations. We also performed a trend analysis of a dataset from the Drug Adverse Reactions Reporting System and a sub-analysis, using previously constructed data from a retrospective cohort study. RESULTS: Risk communication from pharmaceutical manufacturers and academic associations began within 1 year after revisions were made to the package inserts, in October 2006. Twenty times more cases of ONJ have been reported to regulatory authority since 2007, compared with the period before 2007. In our cohort, the incidence proportion of ONJ during and after 2009 was four times greater than before 2009. During this period, BPs were frequently prescribed, whereas there was no increase in the use of alternative agents, such as selective estrogen receptor modulators. CONCLUSION: ONJ was increasingly diagnosed after risk communication efforts, but the impact of the communications was not clear. Safety notifications were diligently disseminated after the package insert was revised. However, there was no surveillance for ONJ before the revision.

Incidence of serious side effects with intravenous bisphosphonate: a clinical audit.

BACKGROUND: Bisphosphonates (BP) have been associated with osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) and atypical femoral fractures (AFF). The prevalence of these side effects in intravenous (IV) BP-treated subjects is not well understood. AIM: This audit aimed to delineate the prevalence of ONJ, thigh pain and AFF in patients having regular IV BP and its effect on bone mineral density (BMD). Design and METHODS: Patients attending for IV BP over a 3-month period completed a questionnaire about thigh pain and dental health. Data concerning BMD, treatment indication and treatment history were obtained from medical records. RESULTS: There were 201 patients between 28 and 94 years (74.1% female) mostly on zoledronate (ZOL) (102) or pamidronate (PAM) (97). Osteoporosis (75.6%) and Paget's disease (16.5%) were the main indications for treatment; median length of IV BP was 4 years (range 0.25-25). One patient had ONJ (0.5%) while oral pain was reported by 6.5% and 12.7% noted tooth loosening. Twenty-seven subjects (13.4%) complained of current thigh pain. AFF occurred in four patients (2%), none of whom had idiopathic osteoporosis. At time of AFF, only one patient had a femoral neck T-score less than -2.5. All four had received pamidronate treatment; median 12.5 years (range 7-22). IV BP treatment significantly increased lumbar spine BMD but not femoral neck BMD. CONCLUSION: Classical ONJ was rare (0.5%), although tooth loss was more frequent. Thigh pain was frequent while AFF occurred in 2.0% of subjects and was associated with long treatment periods and non-osteoporotic bone.