Sequential Assessment of External Nasal Deviation Angle Changes in Patients With a Deviated Nose Who Underwent Bilateral Osteotomy.

OBJECTIVE: A deviated nose is traditionally classified as bony, cartilaginous, or combined deviation. Osteotomy is commonly used to correct bony deviation, and accurate surgical techniques and postoperative patient management are important for favorable outcomes. The authors investigated the change in the external nasal deviation angle over time using sequential clinical photographs to identify the optimal postoperative follow-up duration. METHODS: Medical records and sequential standardized clinical photographs of 22 patients who underwent bilateral medial and lateral osteotomies without dorsal augmentation from January 1, 2014 to May 31, 2021, were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical photographs were classified into 4 periods: "a" preoperative, "b" postoperative day (POD) ≤3 weeks, "c" POD ≤9 weeks, and "d" POD >9 weeks. The angle of deviation (AoD) was measured in both frontal and chin-on-chest views for each period. Differences in AoD between temporally adjacent periods were analyzed. RESULTS: Nineteen men and 3 women (mean age: 28.8 y) were included. Thirteen patients showed rightward deviation, whereas 9 showed leftward deviation. Eleven patients underwent surgery through an endonasal approach, whereas the other 11 underwent surgery through an external approach. In the frontal view, AoD differences (mean ± SD) between periods "a" and "b," "b" and "c," and "c" and "d" were 5.79 ± 3.36 degrees (P < 0.001), 1.44 ± 1.14 degrees (P < 0.001), and 1.07 ± 1.24 degrees (P < 0.05), respectively. In the chin-on-chest view, the values were 5.17 ± 2.69 degrees (P < 0.001), 2.06 ± 2.63 degrees (P < 0.001), and 1.46 ± 1.31 degrees (P < 0.001), respectively. No statistically significant difference in AoD differences was observed between the two approaches. CONCLUSIONS: Angle of deviation can change even 9 weeks after bilateral osteotomy. Thus, long-term follow-up using sequential clinical photographs is mandatory. If needed, close follow-up with early postoperative interventions may be required. The chin-on-chest view showed better sensitivity for assessing AoD than the frontal view.

Assessment of bone gain and neurosensory affection with the sandwich osteotomy technique for vertically deficient posterior mandible using a full digital workflow versus conventional protocol: A randomized split mouth study.

BACKGROUND: Using the sandwich osteotomy technique in the posterior mandible is delicate. This study aimed to assess the safety and the amount of bone gain using a full digital workflow versus the conventional procedure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This split mouth study included 10 patients with bilateral vertically deficient posterior mandible. One side received conventional sandwich interpositional bone grafting (control group), while the other side received the same protocol using two patient-specific guides. The first guide (cutting guide) was used to place the osteotomies safely and accurately according to the predetermined dimensions and locations, and the second guide was used to fix the mobilized bony segment, leaving the desired gap to be filled with a particulate xenogenic bone graft. RESULTS: Full neurosensory recovery was documented at 2 months postoperative for all patients and bilaterally. After 4 months, there was a statistically significant difference in vertical bone gain between both groups (p = 0.001), measuring an average of 3.76 ± 0.72 mm in the study group and 2.69 ± 0.37 mm in the control group. No statistically significant difference was found between the planned vertical augmentation (3.85 ± 0.58 mm) and the obtained vertical bone gain (3.76 ± 0.72 mm) in the study group (p = 0.765) proving the accuracy of the guided procedure. CONCLUSION: Computer-guided sandwich interpositional grafting is predictable regarding the execution of the osteotomies and the accuracy of fixation of the transport segment.

Infection in osteotomy around the knee: Incidence, management and outcomes in a high-volume case series.

PURPOSE: Current evidence around the management of osteotomy-related infection is insufficient to robustly underpin the expert statements formulated by a recent European consensus statement. We present a review of a large case series in a high-volume osteotomy practice to contribute to the understanding of the incidence, management and outcome of infection in this subspecialty area. METHODS: Analyses of two prospectively collected databases for all osteotomy around the knee and infections related to osteotomy were performed, along with a review of hospital readmission data to capture all osteotomy-related infections. Clinical notes were reviewed to assess patient demographics, incidence of infection, how infection was managed and clinical outcome. RESULTS: In a series of 822 osteotomies in 755 patients, there were 21 (2.8%) cases of suspected infection. Twelve (1.6%) were contemporaneously deemed 'superficial' and nine confirmed 'deep' infections (1.2%). Deep infections were all successfully managed with wound debridement, with or without plate removal, depending on union and time from initial surgery. One of these infections was noted during a revision procedure, but no revision was carried out as a direct result of infection, no external fixation was required and no infected nonunions were experienced. CONCLUSION: All of the cases in this series were managed successfully with debridement ± removal of the plate, without the need for revision or external fixation. Any potential signs of infection around an osteotomy, especially in the case of medial high tibial osteotomy, should raise awareness for deep infection and the need for further surgery due to the limited overlying soft tissue cover. This evidence supports the recent European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy algorithm. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.

Operative Time, Cost, and Union Rate of Power Rasp Joint Preparation Versus Traditional Preparation in Arthrodesis of the Foot and Rearfoot.

Time spent in the operating room is valuable to both surgeons and patients. One of the biggest rate-limiting factors when it comes to arthrodesis procedures of the foot and ankle is cartilage removal and joint preparation. Power instrumentation in joint preparation provides an avenue to decrease joint preparation time, thus decreasing operating room time and costs. Arthrodesis of 47 joints (n) from 27 patients were included. Power rasp joint preparation in 26 joints was compared to traditional osteotome and curette joint preparation in 21 joints in both time (seconds), cost (total operating room time cost per minute), and union rate. The overall mean joint preparation time using power rasp for the subtalar joint was 268.3 seconds, talonavicular joint 212.3 seconds, calcaneocuboid joint 142.6 seconds, 1st TMT 107.2 seconds. Mean joint preparation time using traditional method for subtalar joint 509.8 seconds, talonavicular joint 393.0 seconds, calcaneocuboid joint 400.0 seconds, 1st TMT 319.6 seconds. Mean cost of joint preparation using power rasp for subtalar joint $165.47, talonavicular joint $130.89, calcaneocuboid joint $87.94, 1st TMT $66.11. Mean cost of joint preparation using traditional techniques for subtalar joint $314.34, talonavicular joint $242.35, calcaneocuboid joint $246.67, 1st TMT $197.33. Overall union rate was 98% (1 asymptomatic non-union). Increasing efficiency in the operating room is vital to every surgeon's practice. Power rasp joint preparation is a viable option to increase efficiency and decrease operative time, this study shows no statistically significant differences in union rate, with comparable rates to existing literature.

Minimial clinically important difference values in distal metaphyseal ulnar shortening for ulnar impaction syndrome and assessment of the relationship between level of the osteotomy and bone union time.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to define minimal clinically important difference (MCID) values of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for distal metaphyseal ulnar shortening and to assess the relationship between level of the osteotomy and time to bone union. METHODS: 20 patients who had distal metaphyseal ulnar shortening osteotomies due to ulnar impaction syndrome and had at least 6 months of follow-ups were included in this study. The mean follow-up period was 12.3 ± 7.01 months. The PROMs which consisted of patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) and quick disabilities of arm, shoulder, and hand (QDASH) were recorded on the day before the surgery and at follow-up assessments. Grip strength and range of motion were recorded for operated and contralateral wrists at postoperative assessments. Postoperative radiological evaluations of distance of the osteotomy from the distal ulnar articular surface (osteotomy level), the union of osteotomy site; preoperative and postoperative evaluations of styloid-triquetral distance, and ulnar variance were performed using AP wrist x-rays. The MCID values for PRWE and QDASH were calculated using ROC curve analysis. RESULTS: Mean PRWE and QDASH scores decreased statistically significantly. The mean grip strength of contralateral wrists was higher. Mean ulnar variance decreased, whereas styloid-triquetral distance increased postoperatively. Patients with osteotomy levels of greater than 13.7 mm had a longer time from surgery to bone union. Furthermore, patients with time from surgery to bone union shorter than 7 weeks had an osteotomy closer to the ulnar articular surface. The MCID values for PRWE and QDASH were analyzed and calculated through the ROC curve as 22.25 and 20.45, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study has shown us that the osteotomy level affects the time to bone union and an osteotomy closer than 13.7 mm to the ulnar articular surface seems to result in shorter union time. Furthermore, MCID values were defined for PRWE and QDASH as 22.25 and 20.45, respectively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, Therapeutic Study.

Double Chin Concerns after En Bloc Mandibular U-Shaped Osteotomy: Submental-Cervical Soft Tissue Changes and Anterior Belly of Digastric Muscle Assessment.

OBJECTIVE: To assess submental-cervical soft tissue changes after en bloc mandibular U-shaped osteotomy and examine alterations in the anterior belly of digastric muscle (ABDM). METHODS: A retrospective study analyzed 20 patients who underwent en bloc mandibular U-shaped osteotomy from 2018 to 2023. Preoperative (Tp) and long-term follow-up (Tf) CT data were collected for analysis, measuring mandibular volume, soft tissue thickness at menton (Mes) and cervicale (C), and ABDM parameters (length, cross-sectional area (CSA), volume, distance from centroid point to the mandibular margin). Correlation analyses were performed to investigate the connection between soft tissue thickness changes, ABDM changes, and mandibular osteotomy volume. RESULTS: Long-term follow-up revealed a significant increase in soft tissue thickness at the Mes and C points after U-shaped mandibular osteotomy, especially at the C point. The adaptive length of ABDM decreased, CSA increased, and volume decreased, but the ABDM centroid point shifted downward relative to the mandibular margin, indicating drooping protrusion. The increment of soft tissue thickness was moderately positively correlated with the amount of osteotomy, and the decrement of ABDM length and volume were slightly positively correlated with the amount of osteotomy. CONCLUSION: The degree of soft tissue relaxation after U-shaped osteotomy is related to the extent of osteotomy. Notably, the protrusion of ABDM relative to the mandibular margin affects submental-cervical contour aesthetics. Prior to U-shaped osteotomy, it is crucial to assess the soft tissue condition of the patient's lower face, and the individualized design of the osteotomy volume should be carried out cautiously and safely. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

In Vitro Assessment of Compression Patterns Using Different Methods to Achieve Interfragmentary Compression during Tibial Plateau Levelling Osteotomy.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate and characterize different methods to achieve interfragmentary compression during tibial plateau levelling osteotomy (TPLO). STUDY DESIGN: TPLO was performed in 20 canine tibia models (Sawbones, Vashon, Washington, United States) using 3D-printed guides for standardization. Interfragmentary compression was assessed using pressure-sensitive films (Prescale, Fujifilm, Atherstone, United Kingdom). Seven compression methods were tested: (1) Kern bone holding forceps clamping the craniodistal aspect of the TPLO plate to the caudal aspect of the tibia (K); (2) using the distal TPLO plate dynamic compression hole (P); (3) pointed bone reduction forceps engaging the caudal aspect of the proximal bone fragment and the cranial aspect of the tibial crest (F); (4) K + P; (5) K + F; (6) F + P; and (7) K + F + P. Five measurements were obtained for each method, and each bone model was used for two measurements (single method, ± plate). The interfragmentary surface was digitalized and divided into quadrants for standardization and pixel density calculation: Q1, craniomedial; Q2, craniolateral; Q3, caudomedial; and Q4, caudolateral. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc tests were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Mean pressures per quadrant differed significantly between methods (p < 0.001). Methods K, F, and P produced more craniomedial, craniolateral, and caudal compression, respectively. Method K resulted in loss of caudal compression (p < 0.001). Method F + P provided the most even distribution of high interfragmentary compression forces. The addition of method K to this construct (K + F + P) marginally increased cranial compression (p = 0.189 for Q1; p < 0.001 for Q2), but reduced compression caudally (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Method F + P provided more even interfragmentary compression. If method K were used, then combined use with method F + P would be recommended.

Economic evaluation of high tibial osteotomy: Closing wedge is more cost-effective than open wedge technique when analysing the KOOS-12 improvement.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of two techniques for performing a knee valgus osteotomy: opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (OW-HTO) vs closing wedge high tibial osteotomy (CW-HTO). METHODS: In this economic evaluation study, a cost-effectiveness analysis from the perspective of the Spanish public healthcare system was performed, comparing OW-HTO with CW-HTO. All patients with medial knee osteoarthritis who underwent one of these procedures between 2018 and 2020 in our institution were included. The cost analysis included operating room, implant, graft and hospital admission costs. Functional outcomes (KOOS-12, Tegner activity scale, pain and satisfaction) and radiological outcomes (hip-knee-ankle angle, medial proximal tibial angle, tibial slope and patellar height) were analysed. The cost-effectiveness ratio was obtained by calculating the cost of improving the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of KOOS-12 for each procedure. All costs are expressed in 2020 euros. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients met the inclusion criteria (27 OW-HTO and 24 CW-HTO). Good to excellent functional outcomes, significant pain reduction (>6 points) and high patient satisfaction (>9/10) were observed in both groups. Both techniques yielded excellent radiological outcomes. N.s. differences in functional or radiological outcomes improvements between both procedures were found. However, the OW-HTO group presented a higher total cost than the CW-HTO group (4612.1 ± 765.6€ vs. 1827.1 ± 701.9€; p < 0.001). The cost-effectiveness ratio was 818.1 ± 46.8 €/MCID for the CW-HTO procedure and 2414.3 ± 115.2 €/MCID for the OW-HTO procedure (p = 0.025). CONCLUSION: The CW-HTO procedure presented a cost-effectiveness ratio almost three times lower than the OW-HTO procedure. Both techniques allowed to achieve of good to excellent functional outcomes, significant pain reduction and high patient satisfaction while correcting the varus limb malalignment and the metaphyseal tibial varus in patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III; economic study.

Assessment of temporomandibular joint disc position and skeletal stability after bimaxillary surgery.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the correlation between temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disc position and skeletal stability and identify the cephalometric measurements associated with relapse after bimaxillary surgery. METHODS: The participants were 62 women with jaw deformities (124 joints) who underwent bimaxillary surgery. The TMJ disc position was classified into four types (anterior disc displacement (ADD), anterior, fully covered, and posterior) using magnetic resonance imaging, and cephalometric analysis was performed preoperatively and 1 week and 1 year postoperatively. The differences between pre- and 1-week postoperative values (T1) and 1-week and 1-year postoperative value (T2) were calculated for all cephalometric measurements. Moreover, the relationship between skeletal stability using cephalometric measurements, skeletal class, and TMJ disc position was analyzed. RESULTS: The participants included 28 patients in class II and 34 in class III. There was a significant difference in T2 in SNB between class II mandibular advancement cases and class III mandibular setback cases (P = 0.0001). In T2, in ramus inclination, there was a significant difference between the ADD and posterior types (P = 0.0371). Stepwise regression analysis revealed that T2 was significantly correlated with T1 for all measurements. However, the TMJ classification was not applied to all measurements. CONCLUSION: This study suggested that TMJ disc position, including ADD, could not affect skeletal stability, including the maxilla and distal segment after bimaxillary osteotomy, and short-term relapse could be related to the movement amount or angle change by surgery for all measurements.

Fully automated assessment of the knee alignment on long leg radiographs following corrective knee osteotomies in patients with valgus or varus deformities.

INTRODUCTION: The assessment of the knee alignment on long leg radiographs (LLR) postoperative to corrective knee osteotomies (CKOs) is highly dependent on the reader's expertise. Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithms may help automate and standardise this process. The study aimed to analyse the reliability of an AI-algorithm for the evaluation of LLRs following CKOs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, we analysed a validation cohort of 110 postoperative LLRs from 102 patients. All patients underwent CKO, including distal femoral (DFO), high tibial (HTO) and bilevel osteotomies. The agreement between manual measurements and the AI-algorithm was assessed for the mechanical axis deviation (MAD), hip knee ankle angle (HKA), anatomical-mechanical-axis-angle (AMA), joint line convergence angle (JLCA), mechanical lateral proximal femur angle (mLPFA), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), mechanical medial proximal tibia angle (mMPTA) and mechanical lateral distal tibia angle (mLDTA), using the intra-class-correlation (ICC) coefficient between the readers, each reader and the AI and the mean of the manual reads and the AI-algorithm and Bland-Altman Plots between the manual reads and the AI software for the MAD, HKA, mLDFA and mMPTA. RESULTS: In the validation cohort, the AI software showed excellent agreement with the manual reads (ICC: 0.81-0.99). The agreement between the readers (Inter-rater) showed excellent correlations (ICC: 0.95-0. The mean difference in the DFO group for the MAD, HKA, mLDFA and mMPTA were 0.50 mm, - 0.12°, 0.55° and 0.15°. In the HTO group the mean difference for the MAD, HKA, mLDFA and mMPTA were 0.36 mm, - 0.17°, 0.57° and 0.08°, respectively. Reliable outputs were generated in 95.4% of the validation cohort. CONCLUSION:  he application of AI-algorithms for the assessment of lower limb alignment on LLRs following CKOs shows reliable and accurate results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Level III.

A modified triple tibial osteotomy for management of canine cranial cruciate ligament disease: retrospective assessment of 309 procedures (2017-2020).

CASE HISTORY: Medical records from a single referral hospital (Animal Referral Hospital, Sinnamon Park, Australia) of dogs treated with modified triple tibial osteotomy (TTO) for management of cranial cruciate ligament (CrCL) disease from June 2017 to June 2020 were reviewed. Modifications to the originally described TTO procedure included a modified wedge angle calculation and performing the tibial osteotomies without the use of pre-drilled guide holes. CLINICAL FINDINGS: A total of 253 dogs met the inclusion criteria. Two dogs were excluded, leaving 251 dogs that had undergone 309 procedures for assessment, and data from these, including complications, were reviewed. Complete, partial competent, and partial incompetent rupture of the cranial cruciate ligament was identified in 202/309 (65.4%), 79/309 (25.6%), and 28/309 (9.1%) stifles, respectively. Medial meniscal injury was identified in 207/309 (67.0%) stifles at the time of initial surgery. TREATMENT AND OUTCOME: Fifty-eight dogs had bilateral procedures, including both single-session and staged surgeries, and 48 of these were available for analyses. The modifications to the TTO procedure described herein resulted in a median wedge angle of 21° and a median post-operative tibial plateau angle of 5.8°. Tibial compression testing following surgery indicated elimination of cranial tibial thrust in all stifles in this series. The most common intra-operative complication was tibial tuberosity fracture (15/309; 4.9%). Minor post-operative complications occurred in 37/309 (12.0%) procedures, with infection being the most common (27/309; 8.7%). Major post-operative complications occurred in 9/309 (2.9%) procedures. The intra- and post-operative complication rates for dogs undergoing bilateral single-session TTO were both 8.3% (2/24). The intra- and post-operative complication rates for dogs undergoing bilateral staged TTO were both 4.2% (1/24). The low number of complications for both the bilateral single-session and bilateral staged TTO groups precluded statistical analysis. All complications resolved uneventfully as determined by the attending surgeon. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The modified TTO technique described here was safe and effective for the management of canine CrCL disease in the dogs included in the case series. Findings of this study suggest that, with careful case selection, the modified TTO may be performed as a bilateral single-session procedure in dogs with concurrent bilateral cranial cruciate ligament disease. Future studies analysing the effects of these modifications on stifle biomechanics would be beneficial. ABBREVIATIONS: CrCL: Cranial cruciate ligament; SSI: Surgical site infection; TPA: Tibial plateau angle; TPLO: Tibial plateau levelling osteotomy; TTA: Tibial tuberosity advancement; TTO: Triple tibial osteotomy.

Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy Versus Multilevel Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Adult Spinal Deformity: Trends, Outcomes, and Cost.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) with multilevel anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) and lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) in posterior long-segment fusion. BACKGROUND: PSO and ALIF/LLIF are 2 techniques used to restore lumbar lordosis and correct sagittal alignment, with each holding its unique advantages and disadvantages. As there are situations where both techniques can be employed, it is important to compare the risks and benefits of both. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients aged 18 years or older who underwent PSO or multilevel ALIF/LLIF with posterior fusion of 7-12 levels and pelvic fixation were identified. 1:1 propensity score was used to match PSO and ALIF/LLIF cohorts for age, sex, and relevant comorbidities, including smoking status. Logistic regression was used to compare medical and surgical outcomes. Trends and costs were generated for both groups as well. RESULTS: ALIF/LLIF utilization in posterior long fusion has been steadily increasing since 2010, whereas PSO utilization has significantly dropped since 2017. PSO was associated with an increased risk of durotomy ( P < 0.001) and neurological injury ( P = 0.018). ALIF/LLIF was associated with increased rates of postoperative radiculopathy ( P = 0.005). Patients who underwent PSO had higher rates of pseudarthrosis within 1 and 2 years ( P = 0.015; P = 0.010), 1-year hardware failure ( P = 0.028), and 2-year reinsertion of instrumentation ( P = 0.009). Reoperation rates for both approaches were not statistically different at any time point throughout the 5-year period. In addition, there were no significant differences in both procedural and 90-day postoperative costs. CONCLUSIONS: PSO was associated with higher rates of surgical complications compared with anterior approaches. However, there was no significant difference in overall reoperation rates. Spine surgeons should select the optimal technique for a given patient and the type of lordotic correction required.

An assessment of the fixin tplo jig to generate effective compression using a transverse fracture model.

The objective of this study was to determine compressive loads that could be generated using a tibial plateau leveling osteotomy (TPLO) jig with a tensioned strand of 18-gauge stainless steel orthopedic wire in a simulated transverse fracture model. The wire was sequentially tensioned using heavy needle holders or an AO wire tightener. Recorded loads were subsequently compared to loads generated by applying a 3.5 mm limited contact-dynamic compression plate (LC-DCP) as a compression plate. Two segments of 2 cm diameter Delrin rod were placed in a testing apparatus and used to simulate a transverse fracture. A load cell was interposed between the two segments to measure the compressive loads generated during the application of the TPLO jig or the LC-DCP. Compression was generated by sequential tensioning a strand of 18-gauge wire secured through the base of the arms of the TPLO jig or by placing one or two load screws in the LC-DCP. Wires were tensioned using heavy needle holders or an AO wire tightener. Eight replicates of each construct were tested. Recorded loads were compared using a one-way repeated measures ANOVA and Tukey Honestly Significant Difference test. The wire being tensioned broke while attempting a second quarter rotation of the needle holders and when the crank handle of the AO wire tightener was advanced beyond two rotations. The mean + SD peak compressive loads recorded when tensioning the wire using the heavy needle holders and AO wire tightener was 148 ± 7 N and 217 ± 16 N, respectfully. The mean ± SD load recorded after placement of the first and second load screw in the LC-DCP was 131 ± 39 N and 296 ± 49 N, respectively. The compression generated by placing two load screws in the LC-DCP was superior to the compression generated using the jig. The maximum load recorded by tensioning the wire secured through the TPLO jig using the AO wire tightener was superior to the compression generated by placing a single load screw and tensioning the wire using needle holders. Our results demonstrate that the TPLO jig allows surgeons to compress transverse fractures or osteotomies effectively. Tensioning the AO wire tightener allows for sequential tensioning and generates superior compressive loads than tensioning wires with heavy needle holders.

Management of medial femorotibial osteoarthritis: Epidemiology, and survival of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus valgus high tibial osteotomy in France. Study of 108,007 cases from the French National Hospitals Database.

INTRODUCTION: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and valgus high tibial osteotomy (HTO) are two options for isolated medial femorotibial osteoarthritis in genu varum. In the absence of registries for osteotomies and for arthroplasty in the knee, epidemiological data are hard to obtain in France. We therefore performed a retrospective study, with the aims of: 1) estimating UKA and HTO survival without revision by total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and 2) assessing risk factors for revision according to treatment group. HYPOTHESIS: Medium-term survival is better with HTO than UKA in under-70-year-olds. MATERIALS AND METHOD: All elderly patients undergoing HTO or UKA in the French National Hospitals Database for the period 2011-2020 were included: i.e., 108,007 patients; 43,537 HTO (29,330 male, 14,207 female; mean age 49.7 years, 95% CI 49.6-49.8) and 64,470 UKA (31,181 male, 33,289 female; mean age 60.5 years, 95% CI 60.5-60.6). RESULTS: Survival free of revision by TKA was 75.8% (95% CI=75.2-76.4) for UKA and 80.6% (95% CI=80.0-81.3) for HTO (p<0.00001). In UKA, revision risk factors comprised: low annual center volume (<17 UKAs per year) (HR=1.50; 95% CI=1.41-1.59), obesity (HR=1.25; 95% CI=1.18-1.32), and age <60years, with maximum risk for 50-59years (HR=2.41; 95% CI=1.83-3.16 in 50-59 year-olds). In HTO, revision risk factors comprised: obesity (HR=1.42; 95% CI=1.31-1.53), rheumatoid arthritis (HR=2.75; 95% CI=1.37-5.51), joint chondrocalcinosis (HR=2.01; 95% CI=1.18-3.39), and age >60years (HR=8.81; 95% CI=7.23-19.73 in 60-69-year-olds). Male gender was a protective factor against revision in both groups: UKA, HR=0.75 (95% CI=0.72-0.79); HTO, HR=0.73 (95% CI=0.69-0.77). The number of UKAs increased over the years, matching the increase in arthroplasty in France, with a decrease in HTOs until 2019. CONCLUSION: HTO showed better medium-term survival than UKA in under-70-year-olds in France. Even so, indications decreased in favor of UKA, although the respective risk factors differ. These findings suggest that conservative surgery still has a role, depending on osteoarthritis stage. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III; retrospective comparative study.

Anatomical Study of the Lateral Tibial Spine as a Landmark for Weight Bearing Line Assessment during High Tibial Osteotomy.

Background: Accurate pre-operative planning is essential for successful high tibial osteotomy (HTO). The lateral tibial spine is a commonly used anatomical landmark for weight-bearing line assessment. However, studies on the mediolateral (M-L) position of the lateral tibial spine on the tibial plateau and its variability are limited. Purpose: This study aimed to (1) analyze the M-L position of the lateral tibial spine on the tibial plateau and its variability, (2) investigate radiologic parameters that affect the position of the lateral tibial spine, and (3) determine whether the lateral tibial spine can be a useful anatomical landmark for weight-bearing line assessment during HTO. Materials and Methods: Radiological evaluation was performed on 200 participants (64% female, mean age 42.3 ± 13.2 years) who had standing anterior-posterior plain knee radiographs with a patellar facing forward orientation. The distances from the medial border of the tibial plateau to the lateral spine peak (dLSP) and lateral spine inflection point (dLSI) were measured using a picture archiving and communication system. The medial-lateral inter-spine distance (dISP) was also measured. All parameters were presented as percentages of the entire tibial plateau width. The relationships between the parameters were also investigated. Results: The mean value of dLSP was 56.9 ± 2.5 (52.4-64.5)%, which was 5% lower than the Fujisawa point (62%). The mean value of dLSI was 67.9 ± 2.2 (63.4-75.8)%, which was approximately 5% higher than the Fujisawa point. The values of the dLSP and dLSI were variable among patients, and the upper and lower 10% groups showed significantly higher and lower dLSP and dLSI, respectively, than the middle 10% group. The mean value of dISP was 16.5 ± 2.4%, and it was positively correlated with dLSP and dLSI. Conclusions: On average, the dLSP and dLSI were located -5% and +5% laterally from the conventional Fujisawa point, and they may be useful landmarks for correction amount adjustment during HTO. However, it should be noted that correction based on the lateral tibial spine can be affected by anatomical variations, especially in patients with small or large inter-spine distances.

Acetabular Rim Disorders: Epidemiology, Etiology, Management, and Outcomes.

¼ Anatomic disorders of the acetabular rim are a common, correctable source of hip pain in younger patients.¼ Some common conditions of involving abnormal acetabular rim morphology include developmental dysplasia of the hip, pincer-type femoroacetabular impingement, acetabular protrusion, and acetabular retroversion.¼ Treatment option for these conditions were historically limited to open osteotomy and osteoplasty procedures; however, there is increasing use of arthroscopic intervention for these patients.¼ Arthroscopic intervention has demonstrated short-term success in a variety of focal acetabular rim disorders; however, further research is needed to determine the long-term outcomes of these procedures and their utility in more global pathology.

Multifactorial assessment of leukocyte reduced platelet rich plasma injection in dogs undergoing tibial plateau leveling osteotomy: A retrospective study.

This study assessed the effects of concurrent intra-articular injection and Tibial Plateau Leveling Osteotomy (TPLO) plate surface treatment with leukoreduced platelet rich plasma (lPRP) on outcomes of dogs undergoing TPLO. A retrospective study of medical records for cases presenting from January 2018 to December 2020 was performed. Client-owned dogs with naturally occurring cranial cruciate ligament rupture that underwent TPLO surgery were divided into two groups. The lPRP group included cases that underwent intra-articular injection and plate surface treatment at the time of their TPLO. The control group (C) underwent TPLO without PRP treatment. Data analyzed included: presence of surgical site infection, implant removal rate, degree of change in OA progression score, lameness score progression and radiographic bone healing. The short- and long-term complication rate, hospitalization and antibiotic therapy were also compared between the groups. Descriptive statistics, comparison analyses (Chi square test, t-test, Fisher's exact test) and multi-level logistic regression models were used for statistical analysis. A total of 110 cases met the study inclusion criteria: 54 = lPRP, 56 = C. There were no significant differences between groups with regard to gender, age, presence of meniscal tear, weight, or body condition score. Significant findings included: improved radiographic healing of the osteotomy in the lPRP group, improved global OA scores in the lPRP group, and improved lameness score at recheck examination in the lPRP group. There was no significant difference between the lPRP and C group with regard to surgical site infection and implant removal rate. Concurrent intra-articular injection and plate surface treatment with leukocyte reduced PRP at the time of TPLO, is beneficial in slowing the progression of OA, hastening the radiographic evidence of osteotomy healing, and improved lameness score on recheck examination. Leukocyte reduced PRP was not a significant factor in reducing SSI or implant removal rate.

Assessment of return to sport and functional outcomes following distal femoral, double level and high tibial osteotomies for active patients with symptomatic varus malalignment.

PURPOSE: This study indicated the outcomes of three surgical techniques for the treatment of symptomatic unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis (UKOA) with varus malalignment in younger, active patients: distal femoral osteotomy (DFO), double-level osteotomy (DLO) and high tibial osteotomy (HTO). The outcomes measured included the return to sport, sport activity and functional scores. METHODS: A total of 103 patients (19 DFO, 43 DLO, 41 HTO) were enrolled in the study and were divided into three groups based on their oriented deformity, each undergoing one of the three surgical techniques. All patients underwent pre- and post-operative evaluations including X-rays, physical exams and functional assessments. RESULTS: All three surgical techniques were effective in treating UKOA with constitutional malalignment. The average time to return to sport was similar among the three groups (DFO: 6.4 ± 0.3 [5.8-7] months, DLO: 4.9 ± 0.2 [4.5-5.3] months, HTO: 5.6 ± 0.2 [5.2-6] months). The sport activity and functional scores improved significantly for all three groups, with no significant differences observed among the groups. CONCLUSION: Various knee osteotomy procedures, DFO, DLO, and HTO, result in high RTS rates and quick RTS times with satisfactory functional scores. Despite pre- to post-operative improvements in sport activities following DFO and DLO, pre-symptom levels were not reached following all evaluated procedures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective case-control study, Level III.