Exploring Heterogeneity in Cost-Effectiveness Using Machine Learning Methods: A Case Study Using the FIRST-ABC Trial.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore heterogeneity in the cost-effectiveness of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy compared with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in children following extubation. DESIGN: Using data from the FIRST-line support for Assistance in Breathing in Children (FIRST-ABC) trial, we explore heterogeneity at the individual and subgroup levels using a causal forest approach, alongside a seemingly unrelated regression (SUR) approach for comparison. SETTINGS: FIRST-ABC is a noninferiority randomized controlled trial (ISRCTN60048867) including children in UK paediatric intensive care units, which compared HFNC with CPAP as the first-line mode of noninvasive respiratory support. PATIENTS: In the step-down FIRST-ABC, 600 children clinically assessed to require noninvasive respiratory support were randomly assigned to HFNC and CPAP groups with 1:1 treatment allocation ratio. In this analysis, 118 patients were excluded because they did not consent to accessing their medical records, did not consent to follow-up questionnaire or did not receive respiratory support. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome of this study is the incremental net monetary benefit (INB) of HFNC compared with CPAP using a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20,000 per QALY gain. INB is calculated based on total costs and quality adjusted life years (QALYs) at 6 months. The findings suggest modest heterogeneity in cost-effectiveness of HFNC compared with CPAP at the subgroup level, while greater heterogeneity is detected at the individual level. CONCLUSIONS: The estimated overall INB of HFNC is smaller than the INB for patients with better baseline status suggesting that HFNC can be more cost-effective among less severely ill patients.

Cost-effectiveness of nasal high-flow in children with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure.

AIM: A pilot randomised controlled trial assessed the early application of nasal high-flow (NHF) therapy compared with standard oxygen therapy (SOT), in children aged 0 to 16 years presenting to paediatric emergency departments with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure (AHRF). The study estimated the need to escalate therapy and hospital length of stay in the NHF group compared with SOT. This sub-study then assessed the subsequent cost-effectiveness. METHODS: A decision tree-based model was developed, alongside the clinical study, to estimate cost-effectiveness, from the healthcare sector perspective. The primary health economics outcome is measured as incremental cost per length of hospital stay avoided. Incremental cost effectiveness ratios (ICER) measuring change in cost per change in length of stay, were obtained for four samples, depending on responder status and obstructive airways disease. These were (1) obstructive and responder, (2) non-obstructive and responder, (3) obstructive and non-responder and (4) non obstructive and non-responder. Bootstrapping of parameters accounted for uncertainty in estimates of cost and outcome. RESULTS: The ICER for patients randomised to NHF, indicated an additional A$367.20 for a lower hospital length of stay (in days) in the non-obstructive/non-responder sample. In the bootstrap sample, this was found to be cost effective above a willingness to pay threshold of A$10 000. The ICER was A$440.86 in the obstructive/responder sample and A$469.56 in the non-obstructive/responder sample - but both resulted in a longer length of stay. The ICER in the obstructive/non-responder sample was A$52 167.76, also with a longer length of stay, mainly impacted by a small sample of severe cases. CONCLUSION: As first-line treatment, NHF is unlikely to be cost-effective compared with SOT, but for non-obstructive patients who required escalation in care (non-obstructive non-responder), NHF is likely to be cost-effective if willingness-to-pay per reduced hospital length of stay is more than A$10 000 per patient.

Optimal NIV Medicare Access Promotion: Patients With Central Sleep Apnea: A Technical Expert Panel Report From the American College of Chest Physicians, the American Association for Respiratory Care, the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, and the American Thoracic Society.

This document summarizes suggestions of the central sleep apnea (CSA) Technical Expert Panel working group. This paper shares our vision for bringing the right device to the right patient at the right time. For patients with CSA, current coverage criteria do not align with guideline treatment recommendations. For example, CPAP and oxygen therapy are recommended but not covered for CSA. On the other hand, bilevel positive airway pressure (BPAP) without a backup rate may be a covered therapy for OSA, but it may worsen CSA. Narrow coverage criteria that require near elimination of obstructive breathing events on CPAP or BPAP in the spontaneous mode, even if at poorly tolerated pressure levels, may preclude therapy with BPAP with backup rate or adaptive servoventilation, even when those devices provide demonstrably better therapy. CSA is a dynamic disorder that may require different treatments over time, sometimes switching from one device to another; an example is switching from BPAP with backup rate to an adaptive servoventilation with automatic end-expiratory pressure adjustments, which may not be covered. To address these challenges, we suggest several changes to the coverage determinations, including: (1) a single simplified initial and continuing coverage definition of CSA that aligns with OSA; (2) removal of hypoventilation terminology from coverage criteria for CSA; (3) all effective therapies for CSA should be covered, including oxygen and all PAP devices with or without backup rates or servo-mechanisms; and (4) patients shown to have a suboptimal response to one PAP device should be allowed to add oxygen or change to another PAP device with different capabilities if shown to be effective with testing.

Cost-Effectiveness of Nasal High Flow Versus CPAP for Newborn Infants in Special-Care Nurseries.

BACKGROUND: Treating respiratory distress in newborns is expensive. We compared the cost-effectiveness of 2 common noninvasive therapies, nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and nasal high-flow (nHF), for newborn infants cared for in nontertiary special care nurseries. METHODS: The economic evaluation was planned alongside a randomized control trial conducted in 9 Australian special care nurseries. Costs were considered from a hospital perspective until infants were 12 months of age. A total of 754 infants with respiratory distress, born ≥31 weeks' gestation and with birth weight ≥1200 g, <24 hours old, requiring noninvasive respiratory support and/or supplemental oxygen for >1 hour were recruited during 2015-2017. Inpatient costing records were obtained for 753 infants, of whom 676 were included in the per-protocol analysis. Two scenarios were considered: (1) CPAP versus nHF, with infants in the nHF group having "rescue" CPAP backup available (trial scenario); and (2) CPAP versus nHF, as sole primary support (hypothetical scenario). Effectiveness outcomes were rate of endotracheal intubation and transfer to a tertiary-level NICU. RESULTS: As sole primary support, CPAP is more effective and on average cheaper, and thus is superior. However, nHF with back-up CPAP produced equivalent cost and effectiveness results, and there is no reason to make a decision between the 2 treatments on the basis of the cost or effectiveness outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Nontertiary special care nurseries choosing to use only 1 of the modes should choose CPAP. In units with both modes available, using nHF as first-line therapy may be acceptable if there is back-up CPAP.

Estimated Cost-effectiveness of Solar-Powered Oxygen Delivery for Pneumonia in Young Children in Low-Resource Settings.

Importance: Pneumonia is the leading cause of childhood mortality worldwide. Severe pneumonia associated with hypoxemia requires oxygen therapy; however, access remains unreliable in low- and middle-income countries. Solar-powered oxygen delivery (solar-powered O2) has been shown to be a safe and effective technology for delivering medical oxygen. Examining the cost-effectiveness of this innovation is critical for guiding implementation in low-resource settings. Objective: To determine the cost-effectiveness of solar-powered O2 for treating children in low-resource settings with severe pneumonia who require oxygen therapy. Design, Setting, and Participants: An economic evaluation study of solar-powered O2 was conducted from January 12, 2020, to February 27, 2021, in compliance with the World Health Organization Choosing Interventions That Are Cost-Effective (WHO-CHOICE) guidelines. Using existing literature, plausible ranges for component costs of solar-powered O2 were determined in order to calculate the expected total cost of implementation. The costs of implementing solar-powered O2 at a single health facility in low- and middle-income countries was analyzed for pediatric patients younger than 5 years who required supplemental oxygen. Exposures: Treatment with solar-powered O2. Main Outcomes and Measures: The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of solar-powered O2 was calculated as the additional cost per disability-adjusted life-year (DALY) saved. Sensitivity of the ICER to uncertainties of input parameters was assessed through univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Results: The ICER of solar-powered O2 was estimated to be $20 (US dollars) per DALY saved (95% CI, $2.83-$206) relative to the null case (no oxygen). Costs of solar-powered O2 were alternatively quantified as $26 per patient treated and $542 per life saved. Univariate sensitivity analysis found that the ICER was most sensitive to the volume of pediatric pneumonia admissions and the case fatality rate. The ICER was insensitive to component costs of solar-powered O2 systems. In secondary analyses, solar-powered O2 was cost-effective relative to grid-powered concentrators (ICER $140 per DALY saved) and cost-saving relative to fuel generator-powered concentrators (cost saving of $7120). Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this economic evaluation suggest that solar-powered O2 is a cost-effective solution for treating hypoxemia in young children in low- and middle-income countries, relative to no oxygen. Future implementation should prioritize sites with high rates of pediatric pneumonia admissions and mortality. This study provides economic support for expansion of solar-powered O2 and further assessment of its efficacy and mortality benefit.

Appropriate Use of High-Flow Nasal Oxygen in Hospitalized Patients for Initial or Postextubation Management of Acute Respiratory Failure: A Clinical Guideline From the American College of Physicians.

DESCRIPTION: The American College of Physicians (ACP) developed this guideline to provide clinical recommendations on the appropriate use of high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) in hospitalized patients for initial or postextubation management of acute respiratory failure. It is based on the best available evidence on the benefits and harms of HFNO, taken in the context of costs and patient values and preferences. METHODS: The ACP Clinical Guidelines Committee based these recommendations on a systematic review on the efficacy and safety of HFNO. The patient-centered health outcomes evaluated included all-cause mortality, hospital length of stay, 30-day hospital readmissions, hospital-acquired pneumonia, days of intubation or reintubation, intensive care unit (ICU) admission and ICU transfers, patient comfort, dyspnea, delirium, barotrauma, compromised nutrition, gastric dysfunction, functional independence at discharge, discharge disposition, and skin breakdown. This guideline was developed using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) method. TARGET AUDIENCE AND PATIENT POPULATION: The target audience is all clinicians, and the target patient population is adult patients with acute respiratory failure treated in a hospital setting (including emergency departments, hospital wards, intermediate or step-down units, and ICUs). RECOMMENDATION 1A: ACP suggests that clinicians use high-flow nasal oxygen rather than noninvasive ventilation in hospitalized adults for the management of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (conditional recommendation; low-certainty evidence). RECOMMENDATION 1B: ACP suggests that clinicians use high-flow nasal oxygen rather than conventional oxygen therapy for hospitalized adults with postextubation acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (conditional recommendation; low-certainty evidence).

[Home telemonitoring and oxygen therapy in COVID-19 patients: safety, patient satisfaction, and cost-effectiveness]. / Thuisbehandeling van covid-19-patiënten met zuurstof en telemonitoring.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the implementation of home telemonitoring and oxygen therapy in COVID-19 patients. Primary outcomes were safety, patient satisfaction, reduction of hospital stay, and cost-effectiveness. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHOD: All COVID-19 patients who were discharged with home telemonitoring and oxygen therapy between June 1st and November 1st 2020 were included. Eligible patients had a maximum oxygen requirement of 2 liters per minute during the 24 hours prior to discharge with a minimal peripheral oxygen saturation of 94%. A mobile application for telemonitoring was used, which patients or relatives had to be able to use independently. Patient demographics, clinical parameters, data on telemonitoring and readmissions were extracted from the electronic patient records. A survey for patient satisfaction and a cost-effectiveness analysis were performed. RESULTS: Out of 619 admissions, 49 patients were discharged with home telemonitoring and oxygen therapy. Median duration of home oxygen therapy was 11 days with a potential reduction in hospitalization of 616 days. Six patients were readmitted and were significantly more febrile on discharge (67% versus 14%, p=0.01) and had lower oxygenation (95%, (IQR 93-96) versus 96%, (IQR 95-97), p=0.02) with similar levels of oxygen administration. Patient satisfaction was high with a mean score of 5 to 6 on a scale measuring satisfaction from 1 to 7. Estimated total cost reduction was € 146.736. CONCLUSION: This study shows that home telemonitoring and oxygen administration can be safely applied in COVID-19 patients resulting in a high patient satisfaction and reduction in hospital stay and costs.

Assessment of dispersion of airborne particles of oral/nasal fluid by high flow nasal cannula therapy.

BACKGROUND: Nasal High Flow (NHF) therapy delivers flows of heated humidified gases up to 60 LPM (litres per minute) via a nasal cannula. Particles of oral/nasal fluid released by patients undergoing NHF therapy may pose a cross-infection risk, which is a potential concern for treating COVID-19 patients. METHODS: Liquid particles within the exhaled breath of healthy participants were measured with two protocols: (1) high speed camera imaging and counting exhaled particles under high magnification (6 participants) and (2) measuring the deposition of a chemical marker (riboflavin-5-monophosphate) at a distance of 100 and 500 mm on filter papers through which air was drawn (10 participants). The filter papers were assayed with HPLC. Breathing conditions tested included quiet (resting) breathing and vigorous breathing (which here means nasal snorting, voluntary coughing and voluntary sneezing). Unsupported (natural) breathing and NHF at 30 and 60 LPM were compared. RESULTS: Imaging: During quiet breathing, no particles were recorded with unsupported breathing or 30 LPM NHF (detection limit for single particles 33 µm). Particles were detected from 2 of 6 participants at 60 LPM quiet breathing at approximately 10% of the rate caused by unsupported vigorous breathing. Unsupported vigorous breathing released the greatest numbers of particles. Vigorous breathing with NHF at 60 LPM, released half the number of particles compared to vigorous breathing without NHF.Chemical marker tests: No oral/nasal fluid was detected in quiet breathing without NHF (detection limit 0.28 µL/m3). In quiet breathing with NHF at 60 LPM, small quantities were detected in 4 out of 29 quiet breathing tests, not exceeding 17 µL/m3. Vigorous breathing released 200-1000 times more fluid than the quiet breathing with NHF. The quantities detected in vigorous breathing were similar whether using NHF or not. CONCLUSION: During quiet breathing, 60 LPM NHF therapy may cause oral/nasal fluid to be released as particles, at levels of tens of µL per cubic metre of air. Vigorous breathing (snort, cough or sneeze) releases 200 to 1000 times more oral/nasal fluid than quiet breathing (p < 0.001 with both imaging and chemical marker methods). During vigorous breathing, 60 LPM NHF therapy caused no statistically significant difference in the quantity of oral/nasal fluid released compared to unsupported breathing. NHF use does not increase the risk of dispersing infectious aerosols above the risk of unsupported vigorous breathing. Standard infection prevention and control measures should apply when dealing with a patient who has an acute respiratory infection, independent of which, if any, respiratory support is being used. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12614000924651.

Assessment of Peak Inspiratory Flow in Young Infants with Acute Viral Bronchiolitis: Physiological Basis for Initial Flow Setting in Patients Supported with High-Flow Nasal Cannula.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the inspiratory demand in young infants with acute viral bronchiolitis to provide a physiological basis for initial flow setting for patients supported with high flow nasal cannula. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study in 44 infants up to 6 months old with acute viral bronchiolitis, admitted to a pediatric intensive care unit from November 2017 to March 2019. Airflow measurements were performed using spirometry. The primary endpoint was the inspiratory demand as measured by peak tidal inspiratory flow (PTIF). The secondary endpoints were the relationships determined between PTIF, patient weight, and disease severity. RESULTS: Median (Q25-Q75) age and weight of the patients were 37 (20-67) days and 4.3 (3.5-5.0) kg, respectively. Mean PTIF was 7.45 (95% CI 6.51-8.39, min-max: 2.40-16.00) L/minute. PTIF indexed to weight was 1.68 (95% CI 1.51-1.85, min-max: 0.67-3.00) L/kg/minute. PTIF was <2.5 L/kg/minute in 89% (95% CI 75-96) of infants. PTIF was correlated with weight (ρ= 0 .55, P < .001) but not with markers of disease severity, including modified Woods clinical asthma score, Silverman-Andersen score, respiratory rate, fraction of inspired oxygen, and PCO2. CONCLUSIONS: High flow nasal cannula therapy is used commonly to support infants with acute viral bronchiolitis. The efficiency of the device is optimal if the flow setting matches the patient's inspiratory demand. According to our results, a flow rate of <2.5 L/kg/minute would be appropriate in most situations.

Corticosteroids in the Management of Pregnant Patients With Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19).

Recent evidence supports the use of an early, short course of glucocorticoids in patients with COVID-19 who require mechanical ventilation or oxygen support. As the number of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases continues to increase, the number of pregnant women with the disease is very likely to increase as well. Because pregnant women are at increased risk for hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, and mechanical ventilation support, obstetricians will be facing the dilemma of initiating maternal corticosteroid therapy while weighing its potential adverse effects on the fetus (or neonate if the patient is postpartum and breastfeeding). Our objective is to summarize the current evidence supporting steroid therapy in the management of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and COVID-19 and to elaborate on key modifications for the pregnant patient.

Uso de concentradores de oxígeno de uso hospitalario en el contexto de COVID-19 / Use of hospital use oxygen concentrators in the context of COVID-19

INTRODUCIÓN La hipoxemia, (una disminución anormal de la presión parcial de oxígeno en la sangre arterial por debajo de 60 mmHg), es una condición presente en diversas condiciones clínicas, incluyendo COVID-19. Para el tratamiento de la hipoxemia, se requiere la administración de oxígeno medicinal (también denominado oxígeno suplementario), gas que forma parte de la lista modelo de medicamentos esenciales de la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS). El oxígeno medicinal no solo tiene el objetivo de revertir la hipoxia tisular (daño fisiológico causado por falta de oxígeno en un determinado tejido) sino que también aumenta las probabilidades de sobrevida en pacientes afectados con esta condición. Por ello, la OMS señala que es necesario que en los establecimientos de salud se cuente con un suministro seguro de oxígeno, siendo necesario que figure en los presupuestos de asistencia sanitaria y exista en los establecimientos de salud (OMS 2016). En Perú, el oxígeno medicinal está considerado en el grupo de medicamentos denominados gases medicinales. La Dirección General de Medicamentos Insumos y Drogas (DIGEMID), señala que el oxígeno medicinal debe tener una concentración de entre 99 a 100 % de O2 (MINSA 2018). Sin embargo, en el contexto de la pandemia de COVID-19, se ha autorizado el uso del oxígeno medicinal de concentración no menor al 93 % (Presidente de la República 2020). Cabe precisar que la definición de oxígeno medicinal al 93 % contempla al oxígeno extraído del aire mediante un proceso de tamizado molecular (U.S. Pharmacopeia 2018). TECNOLOGÍA DE INTERÉS: La OMS señala que los concentradores de oxígeno representan una opción adecuada y favorable para suministrar oxígeno para el tratamiento de pacientes en países en desarrollo, especialmente cuando los cilindros y otros sistemas convencionales son inapropiados o no estén disponibles. También señala que los concentradores de oxígeno pueden ser considerados como una fuente de este gas medicinal aun disponiéndose de suministro de oxígeno por los métodos convencionales cuando el acceso a este gas pueda verse reducido por la falta de accesorios, suministro eléctrico y la escasez de personal calificado (OMS 2016). METODOLOGÍA: Se realizó una búsqueda sistemática de la literatura hasta el día 9 de julio de 2020 con respecto al uso de concentradores de oxígeno en el contexto de COVID-19. Para ello se emplearon las bases de datos bibliográficas: PubMed, Medline vía OVID y LILACS. Asimismo, se realizó una búsqueda manual avanzada en el motor de búsqueda Google, y en páginas web de sociedades o instituciones tales como: Organización Mundial de la Salud. RESULTADOS: Como resultado de la búsqueda, no se encontraron guías de práctica clínica, evaluaciones de tecnologías sanitarias, revisiones sistemáticas o estudios primarios que evalúen el uso de concentradores de oxígeno en el contexto de COVID-19. Tampoco se han publicado series que describan la experiencia de uso de este dispositivo médico en el contexto de la pandemia por COVID-19. A la fecha, se han publicado documentos técnicos de la OMS respecto al empleo de tecnologías sanitarias para suplir la necesidad de oxígeno en el tratamiento de pacientes con COVID-19 y una guía de la National Health Service del Reino Unido donde se describe al concentrador de oxígeno entre las alternativas de suministro de oxígeno para uso en pacientes con COVID-19 que requieren oxigenoterapia. CONCLUSIONES: En el contexto de la emergencia sanitaria nacional debido a la pandemia de COVID-19, la alta demanda de administración de oxígeno suplementario para la atención de un grupo rápidamente creciente de pacientes, impone la necesidad de explorar el uso de alternativas tecnológicas sanitarias que puedan servir como suministro de este gas en aras de resguardar la salud pública y la vida de la población. Así, se ha realizado el presente reporte breve el cual informa acerca del uso hospitalario de los concentradores de oxígeno, sus características tecnológicas y sus usos para oxigenoterapia, a la luz de la literatura técnica disponible al 9 de julio de 2020. De acuerdo con los documentos técnicos incluidos en el presente reporte breve, es razonable proponer que los concentradores de oxígeno constituyen una alternativa viable en entornos de escasos recursos o disponibilidad limitada de otras fuentes de oxígeno más avanzadas. Siendo que tienen una capacidad limitada de proveer flujos y concentraciones de oxígeno, la utilidad de este equipo médico estaría orientada principalmente para la oxigenoterapia de bajo flujo, la misma que debe ser prescrita por el equipo médico tratante de acuerdo con las necesidades del paciente.

Effectiveness of different treatments in obesity hypoventilation syndrome.

Obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS) is an undesirable consequence of obesity, defined as daytime hypoventilation, sleep disorder breathing and obesity; during the past few years the prevalence of extreme obesity has markedly increased worldwide consequently increasing the prevalence of OHS. Patients with OHS have a lower quality of life and a higher risk of unfavourable cardiometabolic consequences. Early diagnosis and effective treatment can lead to significant improvement in patient outcomes; therefore, such data has noticeably raised interest in the management and treatment of this sleep disorder. This paper will discuss the findings on the main current treatment modalities OHS will be discussed.

First-line oxygen therapy with high-flow in bronchiolitis is not cost saving for the health service.

BACKGROUND: Bronchiolitis is the most common reason for hospital admission in infants. High-flow oxygen therapy has emerged as a new treatment; however, the cost-effectiveness of using it as first-line therapy is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To compare the cost of providing high-flow therapy as a first-line therapy compared with rescue therapy after failure of standard oxygen in the management of bronchiolitis. METHODS: A within-trial economic evaluation from the health service perspective using data from a multicentre randomised controlled trial for hypoxic infants (≤12 months) admitted to hospital with bronchiolitis in Australia and New Zealand. Intervention costs, length of hospital and intensive care stay and associated costs were compared for infants who received first-line treatment with high-flow therapy (early high-flow, n=739) or for infants who received standard oxygen and optional rescue high-flow (rescue high-flow, n=733). Costs were applied using Australian costing sources and are reported in 2016-2017 AU$. RESULTS: The incremental cost to avoid one treatment failure was AU$1778 (95% credible interval (CrI) 207 to 7096). Mean cost of bronchiolitis treatment including intervention costs and costs associated with length of stay was AU$420 (95% CrI -176 to 1002) higher per infant in the early high-flow group compared with the rescue high-flow group. There was an 8% (95% CrI 7.5 to 8.6) likelihood of the early high-flow oxygen therapy being cost saving. CONCLUSIONS: The use of high-flow oxygen as initial therapy for respiratory failure in infants with bronchiolitis is unlikely to be cost saving to the health system, compared with standard oxygen therapy with rescue high-flow.

Weaning Humidified High Flow Oxygen Therapy among Paediatric Patients: An Integrative Review of Literature.

PROBLEM: The paucity of up-to-date recommendations and evidence-based models, whether it is physician-initiated or initiated by other healthcare professionals, for humidified high flow oxygen therapy among children. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: The inclusion criteria included the following: 1) use of high flow oxygen therapy (≥15 L/min); 2) published studies from the year 2000 and onwards; 3) research article in a peer-reviewed journal; 4) studies conducted in a hospital setting involving paediatric patients <18 years old; 5) availability of full article online. SAMPLE: From March to April 2018, electronic databases such as PubMed, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Excerpta Medica Database, Cochrane Library, Joanna Briggs Institute Library of Systematic Reviews, SCOPUS, Ovid, Informit, and Google Scholar were accessed. The systematic search initially yielded 41 studies. RESULTS: Eventually, three eligible studies were reviewed and appraised. Overarching themes were identified: 1) the lack of weaning standards; 2) the limited focus on young population in intensive care settings; and 3) the paucity of weaning models. CONCLUSION: The lack of studies suggested that this is a fertile area for research. In this light, this paper challenged researchers, clinicians, and experts to develop evidence-based standards and models of weaning towards efficient and better quality of care. IMPLICATION: This review may lead to the development of nurse-led or nurse-initiated weaning protocols to enable timely weaning intervention for children and thus reduce the need for prolonged oxygen use. Furthermore, this may also instigate an economic evaluation of a nurse-lead weaning against current models of medically lead weaning.

Patient registries for home oxygen research and evaluation.

Randomized clinical trials are the preferred study design to address key research questions about the benefits or harms of interventions. However, randomized trials of oxygen therapy are difficult to conduct and have limitations. The purpose of this article is to offer our view on the potential use of patient registries in the field of home oxygen in COPD as an alternative to randomized trials by referring to the Swedish experience with a national registry for respiratory failure. Patient registries use observational study methods to collect uniform data (clinical and other) to evaluate specified outcomes for a population defined by a particular disease, condition, or exposure. As opposed to administrative databases, patient registries serve one or more predetermined scientific, clinical, or policy purposes. By systematically and prospectively compiling relevant data, patient registries may describe the natural history of a disease, determine effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, assess safety or harm, and measure quality of care. Registry-based randomized trials (ie, randomized trials within a clinical registry) combine the advantages of a prospective randomized trial with the strengths of a large-scale all-comers clinical registry. Challenges and issues in the design and implementation of patient registries include the representativeness of participants, data collection, quality assurance, ownership, and governance. Notwithstanding their limitations, patient registries represent valuable tools in the conduct of research in the area of home oxygen therapy.

Oxygen Therapy in Ireland: A Nationwide Review of Delivery, Monitoring and Cost Implications

Aims Our aim was to establish which hospitals in Ireland are running oxygen clinics and to compare oxygen prescription in hospitals to a guideline standard. Long term oxygen therapy is known to be of benefit to a specific cohort of patients but is not without risk. Methods We sent an online questionnaire and followed up by phone to representatives in Irish hospitals in which domiciliary oxygen is prescribed. We obtained responses from 32 hospitals. Results Twelve hospitals (38%) had a dedicated oxygen assessment clinic while twenty (62%) did not. Centres without oxygen clinics generally prescribed oxygen following an in-patient stay 18/23 centres (78%) and were unable to provide follow up for patients on oxygen in 6/23 centres (26%). Centres with oxygen clinics generally met criteria for initial assessment and oxygen prescription, however titration of oxygen and general follow up did not meet guideline recommendations. Conclusion Due to a lack of dedicated oxygen assessment and review services, many Irish patients are not optimally treated with domiciliary oxygen.

Ultrasound Assessment of Respiratory Workload With High-Flow Nasal Oxygen Versus Other Noninvasive Methods After Chest Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the respiratory workload using the diaphragm thickening fraction (DTf) determined by sonography during high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO), standard oxygen therapy (SOT), and noninvasive bilevel positive airway pressure support (BIPAP) in patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) after cardiothoracic surgery. DESIGN: Prospective controlled clinical trial. SETTING: A French 23-bed cardiothoracic surgical intensive care unit. PARTICIPANTS: Nonintubated patients with ARF after cardiothoracic surgery or while awaiting lung transplantation. INTERVENTIONS: HFNO (50 L/min), SOT via a standard facemask, and BIPAP (pressure support, 4 cmH2O; positive end-expiratory pressure [PEEP], 4 cmH2O), with FIO2 kept constant were successively applied and compared. With BIPAP, pressure support or PEEP increments up to 8 cmH2O were compared with baseline settings. Each measurement was made after stable breathing for 5 minutes. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Fifty patients aged 60.0 ± 12.2 years were enrolled, including 14 (28%) with obesity. Mean PaO2/FIO2 was 153 ± 55 mmHg. DTf was lower with HFNO and BIPAP than with SOT (respectively 21.2% ± 15.1% v 30.9% ± 21.1% and 17.8% ± 19.1% v 30.9% ± 21.1%, p < 0.001) and was not different with HFNO versus BIPAP (p = 0.22). With BIPAP, increasing pressure support to 8 cmH2O decreased DTf (21.0% ± 14.3% v 28.8% ± 19.8%, p = 0.009), whereas increasing PEEP to 8 cmH2O did not (25.2% ± 17.2% v 28.8% ± 19.8%, p = 0.79). Tidal volume increased to 10.6 ± 3.4 mL/kg with 8 cmH2O pressure support v 8.8 ± 2.7 mL/kg with 4 cmH2O pressure support (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: HFNO provides a comparable respiratory workload decrease compared with BIPAP at lower levels of pressure support and PEEP compared with SOT. Increasing BIPAP pressure support may provide higher levels of assistance but carries a risk of overdistension.

Healthcare costs of the SATisfaction and adherence to COPD treatment (SAT) study follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterised by recurring exacerbations. We estimated the costs of healthcare resources for COPD management funded by the Italian National Healthcare Service (INHS) for one year. METHODS: We examined the demographic, clinical, and economic variables at enrolment and follow-up visits (at 6 and 12 months) of COPD patients participating in the SAT study and referred to 20 Italian pulmonary centres with different institutional characteristics. Costs were expressed in Euro (€) 2018. A random effects log-linear panel regression model was performed to predict the average cost per patient. RESULTS: Most of the centres were public institutions (90%; public university hospital: 30%). The total average cost of COPD was €2647.38/patient and ICS/LABA/LAMA therapy contributed the most (€1541.45). The average cost was €6206.19/patient for severe COPD (+139.67% vs the cost/patient with mild or moderate COPD). The regression model showed that, others things being equal, increases in the predicted average logged cost per patient were due to liquid oxygen therapy (+468.31%), three COPD exacerbations during the follow-up (+254.54%), and ICS/LABA or ICS/LABA/LAMA associated therapy (+59.26%). Moreover, a 1.19% increment was observed for each additional score of the CAT questionnaire. Conversely, a 36.52% reduction in the predicted average logged cost was reported for hospitals managed by local healthcare authorities. CONCLUSIONS: The health econometric approach is innovative in the management of COPD patients in Italy. The results of the random effects log-linear panel data regression model may help clinicians estimate INHS costs when managing COPD patients. Clinicaltrials.gov ID# NCT02689492.

A pilot study of heated and humidified low flow oxygen therapy: An assessment in infants with mild and moderate bronchiolitis (HHOT AIR study).

BACKGROUND: Heated and humidified high flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy has been used in children with severe bronchiolitis. No data exists in children with mild to moderate bronchiolitis requiring lower flows of heated and humidified oxygen therapy. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, randomized pilot study of standard dry oxygen (control) versus heated and humidified low flow nasal cannula (HHLFNC), <4 liters per minute (LPM) oxygen, (treatment) in healthy children ≤24 months old with bronchiolitis. Clinical assessments were made using Respiratory Distress Assessment Instrument (RDAI), respiratory rate (RR), and oxygen saturation. RESULTS: Thirty-two children were enrolled (16 participants in each group). There was no significant difference in mean RDAI over time between groups. There was a significant difference in mean RDAI over time within control group, at hour 12, and treatment group, at hour 1, compared to baseline. RDAI in the treatment group was overall lower over time compared to control group. There was no significant difference in mean RR over time between or within groups, between mean length of stay and duration of oxygen requirement. Subgroup analyses showed lower RDAI in subjects that had RSV infection, male gender, and non-black race. CONCLUSIONS: The use of HHLFNC oxygen therapy may provide more comfort and may result in more rapid improvements in RDAI compared to standard dry oxygen therapy over time. HHFLNC is safe and well tolerated compared to standard dry oxygen. Larger studies are needed to assess the clinical efficacy of HHLFNC oxygen therapy.

Non-Invasive Positive airway Pressure thErapy to Reduce Postoperative Lung complications following Upper abdominal Surgery (NIPPER PLUS): protocol for a single-centre, pilot, randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are a common serious complication following upper abdominal surgery leading to significant consequences including increased mortality, hospital costs and prolonged hospitalisation. The primary objective of this study is to detect whether there is a possible signal towards PPC reduction with the use of additional intermittent non-invasive ventilation (NIV) compared with continuous high-flow nasal oxygen therapy alone following high-risk elective upper abdominal surgery. Secondary objectives are to measure feasibility of: (1) trial conduct and design and (2) physiotherapy-led NIV and a high-flow nasal oxygen therapy protocol, safety of NIV and to provide preliminary costs of care information of NIV and high-flow nasal oxygen therapy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a single-centre, parallel group, assessor blinded, pilot, randomised trial, with 130 high-risk upper abdominal surgery patients randomly assigned via concealed allocation to either (1) usual care of continuous high-flow nasal oxygen therapy for 48 hours following extubation or (2) usual care plus five additional 30 min physiotherapy-led NIV sessions within the first two postoperative days. Both groups receive standardised preoperative physiotherapy and postoperative early ambulation. No additional respiratory physiotherapy is provided to either group. Outcome measures will assess incidence of PPC within the first 14 postoperative days, recruitment ability, physiotherapy-led NIV and high-flow nasal oxygen therapy protocol adherence, adverse events relating to NIV delivery and costs of providing a physiotherapy-led NIV and a high-flow nasal oxygen therapy service following upper abdominal surgery. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval has been obtained from the relevant institution and results will be published to inform future multicentre trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12617000269336; Pre-results.