Exploring binding mode assessment of novel kaempferol, resveratrol, and quercetin derivatives with PPAR-α as potent drug candidates against cancer.

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPAR)-α, a ligand-activated transcription factor stands out to be a valuable protein target against cancer. Given that ligand binding is the crucial process for the activation of PPAR-α, fibrate class of synthetic compounds serves as potent agonist for the receptor. However, their serious side effects limit the long-term application in cancer. This emphasizes the dire need to identify new candidates that would exert desired activation by abrogating the adverse effects caused by synthetic agonists. Natural dietary products serve as an important source of drug discovery. Hence, the present study encompasses the investigation of the role of natural plant phenolic compounds: kaempferol, resveratrol, and quercetin and their 8708 derivatives by the means of computational pipeline comprising molecular docking and molecular dynamic (MD) simulation techniques. Docking calculations shortlisted potential candidates, namely 6-cinnamylchrysin (6-CC), resveratrol potassium-4-sulfate (RPS) and 6-[2-(3,4-Dihydroxyphenyl)-5-hydroxy-4-oxochromen-7-yl]oxyhexyl nitrate (DHOON), and derivatives of kaempferol, resveratrol, and quercetin, respectively. 6-CC, RPS, and DHOON manifested better affinities of - 32.83 kcal/mol (Ala333, Lys358, His440), - 27.22 kcal/mol (Tyr314, Met355), and - 30.18 kcal/mol (Ser280, Tyr314, Ala333), respectively, and were found to act as good stimulants for PPAR-α. Among these three compounds, 6-CC caused relatively least deviations and fluctuations analyzed through MD simulation which judiciously held responsible to attain most favorable interaction with PPAR-α. Followed by the binding free energy (ΔG) calculations using MM-GBSA confirmed the key role of 6-CC toward PPAR-α. The compound 6-CC also achieved high drug-likeness and pharmacokinetic properties. Thus, these findings stipulate new drug leads for PPAR-α receptor which abets a way to develop new anti-cancer drugs.

Identifying qualitative differences in PPARα signaling networks in human and rat hepatocytes and their significance for next generation chemical risk assessment methods.

In this paper, we evaluate the PPARα signaling network in rats, examining transcriptional responses in primary hepatocytes exposed to a PPARα specific ligand, GW7647. These transcriptomic studies were complemented with ChIP-seq studies of PPARα binding and transcription binding motif identification for PPARα responsive genes. We also conducted a limited study of GW7647 dosing the in intact rat to examine differences in transcriptional responses for primary hepatocytes in vitro and in the intact liver. The rat network has a much larger number of down-regulated genes and pathways than we had found in the human and the PPARα binding motifs in rat differed for upregulated and down regulated genes. Based on these results and comparison with our previous work with the human PPARα signaling network, we identified qualitative differences in the transcriptional networks controlled by PPARα activation in the two species that provide an explanation of the interspecies differences in the responses of humans and rodents to GW7647 and likely to other PPARα agonists. These studies also allow some observations on the manner in which in vitro, fit-for-purpose assays in human hepatocytes could form the basis for risk assessment without recourse to in-life studies in rodents or other test species.

Non-clinical safety evaluation and risk assessment to human of aleglitazar, a dual PPAR α/γ agonist, and its major human metabolite.

The non-clinical safety profile of aleglitazar, a peroxisome proliferator activated receptor alpha/gamma agonist, and its major human metabolite M6 was studied in a complete package consisting of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics characterization, safety pharmacology, genotoxicity, repeat dose toxicity, reproductive toxicity and carcinogenicity studies. These studies identified the following main targets similar to other PPAR agonists: red blood cell parameters, liver, heart, kidney, ovaries, testes, bone marrow, adipose tissue, and fluid accumulation. Additionally, and in the 12-month monkey study only, an increased incidence of generalized hair loss/thinning was observed in all groups including controls. In the rat carcinogenicity study there was no statistically significant increase in tumors. In the mouse carcinogenicity study, there was an increased incidence of angiomatous tumors and there were three males with gallbladder adenoma. No relevant compound-related effects were observed in safety pharmacology, genotoxicity, and a 28-day immunotoxicity rat study. Effects observed in reproductive toxicity studies were similar to those known for other PPARγ agonists. Separate studies with the human metabolite M6 did not reveal findings that would prevent human dosing. Overall, the results from the non-clinical safety studies conducted with aleglitazar and the human metabolite M6 were considered to support the clinical Phase 3 program.

PPAR agonists stimulate adipogenesis at the expense of osteoblast differentiation while inhibiting osteoclast formation and activity.

Drugs used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease, specifically peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) agonists, have been reported to affect bone cell function and fracture risk. In this study, we assessed the direct effects of PPAR-γ agonists (rosiglitazone and troglitazone), used in the treatment of diabetes, and a PPAR-α agonist (fenofibrate), used to treat hyperlipidaemia, on the function of primary osteoblasts and osteoclasts. Formation of 'trabecular' bone structures by rat calvarial osteoblasts was reduced by up to 85% in cultures treated with rosiglitazone and by 45% in troglitazone-treated or fenofibrate-treated cultures; at the same time, lipid droplet formation was increased by 40-70%. The expression of key osteogenic markers was similarly downregulated in cultures treated with PPAR agonists, whereas adipogenesis markers were upregulated. Formation of osteoclasts in cultures derived from mouse marrow diminished with fenofibrate treatment, whereas both glitazones reduced resorptive activity without affecting osteoclast number. Metformin, although not a PPAR agonist, is also commonly used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Here, metformin was found to have no effect on bone cell function. Taken together, these data suggest that PPAR-γ agonists may enhance bone loss via increased adipogenesis at the expense of osteoblast formation. In contrast, PPAR-α agonists may prevent bone loss. Given that the prevalence of diabetes and cardiovascular disease is expected to rise significantly, greater attention may need to be paid to the effects of PPAR agonists on bone homeostasis.

Plasma stability-dependent circulation of acyl glucuronide metabolites in humans: how circulating metabolite profiles of muraglitazar and peliglitazar can lead to misleading risk assessment.

Muraglitazar and peliglitazar, two structural analogs differing by a methyl group, are dual peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α/γ activators. Both compounds were extensively metabolized in humans through acyl glucuronidation to form 1-O-ß-acyl glucuronide (AG) metabolites as the major drug-related components in bile, representing at least 15 to 16% of the dose after oral administration. Peliglitazar AG was the major circulating metabolite, whereas muraglitazar AG was a very minor circulating metabolite in humans. Peliglitazar AG circulated at lower concentrations in animal species than in humans. Both compounds had a similar glucuronidation rate in UDP-glucuronic acid-fortified human liver microsomal incubations and a similar metabolism rate in human hepatocytes. Muraglitazar AG and peliglitazar AG were chemically synthesized and found to be similarly oxidized through hydroxylation and O-demethylation in NADPH-fortified human liver microsomal incubations. Peliglitazar AG had a greater stability than muraglitazar AG in incubations in buffer, rat, or human plasma (pH 7.4). Incubations of muraglitazar AG or peliglitazar AG in plasma produced more aglycon than acyl migration products compared with incubations in the buffer. These data suggested that the difference in plasma stability, not differences in intrinsic formation, direct excretion, or further oxidation of muraglitazar AG or peliglitazar AG, contributed to the observed difference in the circulation of these AG metabolites in humans. The study demonstrated the difficulty in doing risk assessment based on metabolite exposure in plasma because the more reactive muraglitazar AG would not have triggered a threshold of concern based on the recent U.S. Food and Drug Administration guidance on Metabolites in Safety Testing, whereas the more stable peliglitazar AG would have.

Assessment of dose proportionality of muraglitazar after repeated oral dosing in rats via a sparse sampling methodology.

Muraglitazar is an alpha/gamma-dual peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) agonist. This study evaluated the single- and multiple-dose oral toxicokinetics of muraglitazar in rats at doses of 3, 30 and 300 mg/kg/day. In total, 15 rats/gender/dose group received muraglitazar every day for 1 month. On both day 1 and day 28, blood samples were obtained at 0.5, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 24 h post-dose, followed by LC/MS analysis. In order to minimize blood loss in the rats, a sparse sampling approach was used to delineate the toxicokinetics. The peak plasma concentration (C(max)) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (TAUC(0-t)) values for muraglitazar increased in a proportion less than the increment in dose. As the dose increased in the ratio 1:10:100, the C(max) for muraglitazar in male and female rats increased in the ratio of 1:10.3:58.6 and 1:15.3:75.3 on day 1, and 1:5.9:28.1 and 1:13.3:37.3 on day 28, respectively. The corresponding TAUC(0-t) values for males and females were in the ratio of 1:10.2:131 and 1:12.4:131 on day 1, and 1:9.5:93.4 and 1:11.8:94.3 on day 28, respectively. The results indicate that muraglitazar exhibits a dose dependent toxicokinetics in rats and the systemic exposure of muraglitazar was decreased on day 28 compared with day 1.

Muraglitazar (Bristol-Myers Squibb/Merck).

Bristol-Myers Squibb and Merck & Co are co-developing muraglitazar, a dual peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha/gamma agonist, for the potential treatment of type 2 diabetes and other metabolic disorders. In November 2004, approval was anticipated as early as mid-2005.