Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 11 de 11
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Cancer Prev Res (Phila) ; 14(8): 803-810, 2021 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34127509

RESUMO

Few studies have directly targeted nonparticipants in colorectal cancer screening to identify effective engagement strategies. We undertook a randomized controlled trial that targeted nonparticipants in a previous trial of average-risk subjects which compared participation rates for mailed invitations offering a fecal test, a blood test or a choice of either. Nonparticipants (n = 899) were randomized to be offered a kit containing a fecal immunochemical test (FIT), directions on how to arrange a blood DNA test, or the option of doing either. Screening participation was assessed 12 weeks after the offer. To assess the cognitive and attitudinal variables related to participation and invitee choice, invitees were surveyed after 12 weeks, and associations were investigated using multinomial logistic regression. Participation rates were similar between groups (P = 0.88): 12.0% for FIT (35/292), 13.3% for the blood test (39/293), and 13.4% for choice (39/290). Within the choice group, participation was significantly higher with FIT (9.7%, 28/290) compared with the blood test (3.8%, 11/290, P = 0.005). The only variable significantly associated with participation was socioeconomic status when offered FIT, and age when offered choice but there was none when offered the blood test. Survey respondents indicated that convenience, time-saving, comfort, and familiarity were major influences on participation. There was no clear advantage between a fecal test, blood test, or choice of test although, when given a choice, the fecal test was preferred. Differences in variables associated with participation according to invitation strategy warrant consideration when deciding upon an invitation strategy for screening nonparticipants. PREVENTION RELEVANCE: This trial of screening for those at average risk for colorectal cancer targeted past fecal-test nonparticipants and compared participation rates for mailed invitations offering a fecal test, blood test, or choice of either. Although there was no clear advantage between strategies, factors associated with participation differed between each strategy.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Pacientes não Comparecentes , Participação do Paciente/métodos , Idoso , Austrália/epidemiologia , Comportamento de Escolha , Colonoscopia/psicologia , Colonoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Colorretais/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Colorretais/prevenção & controle , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/psicologia , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pacientes não Comparecentes/psicologia , Pacientes não Comparecentes/estatística & dados numéricos , Sangue Oculto , Recusa de Participação/psicologia , Recusa de Participação/estatística & dados numéricos
4.
BMJ Open ; 9(9): e028753, 2019 09 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31519672

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To quantify the economic and psychological impact of the cancellation of operations due to winter pressures on patients, their families and the economy. DESIGN: This questionnaire study was designed with the help of patient groups. Data were collected on the economic and financial burden of cancellations. Emotions were also quantified on a 5-point Likert scale. SETTING: Five NHS Hospital Trusts in the East Midlands region of England. PARTICIPANTS: We identified 796 participants who had their elective operations cancelled between 1 November 2017 and 31 March 2018 and received responses from 339 (43%) participants. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were posted a modified version of a validated quality of life questionnaire with a prepaid return envelope. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measures were the financial and psychological impact of the cancellation of elective surgery on patients and their families. RESULTS: Of the 339 respondents, 163 (48%) were aged <65 years, with 111 (68%) being in employment. Sixty-six (19%) participants had their operations cancelled on the day. Only 69 (62%) of working adults were able to return to work during the time scheduled for their operation, with a mean loss of 5 working days (SD 10). Additional working days were lost subsequently by 60 (54%) participants (mean 7 days (SD 10)). Family members of 111 (33%) participants required additional time off work (mean 5 days (SD 7)). Over 30% of participants reported extreme levels of sadness, disappointment, anger, frustration and stress. At least moderate concern about continued symptoms was reported by 234 (70%) participants, and 193 (59%) participants reported at least moderate concern about their deteriorating condition. CONCLUSIONS: The cancellation of elective surgery during the winter had an adverse impact on patients and the economy, including days of work lost and health-related anxiety. We recommend better planning, and provision of more notice and better support to patients.


Assuntos
Agendamento de Consultas , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos , Pacientes não Comparecentes/psicologia , Pacientes não Comparecentes/estatística & dados numéricos , Estações do Ano , Revisão da Utilização de Recursos de Saúde , Eficiência Organizacional , Inglaterra , Hospitais de Distrito , Humanos , Modelos Lineares , Salas Cirúrgicas/organização & administração , Inquéritos e Questionários , Recursos Humanos
5.
Health Expect ; 22(6): 1260-1271, 2019 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31486184

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Non-attendance at diabetes appointments is costly to the health service and linked with poorer patient outcomes. OBJECTIVE: Peer researchers aimed to conduct interviews and survey people who miss appointments about their beliefs and perceptions regarding their diabetes and diabetes appointments. DESIGN: A mixed-methods cross-sectional design with interviews conducted by peer researchers with diabetes and a questionnaire was used. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Peer researchers conducted semi-structured telephone interviews in one health board in Scotland with ten people who had missed diabetes appointments. A further 34 people who had missed appointments completed a questionnaire. The study was informed by two psychological theories (the Theory of Planned Behaviour and the Self-Regulation Model), and interviews were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Interviewees planned to attend appointments but practical barriers, low perceived value of appointments and the feeling that diabetes had little impact upon their lives' emerged as key reasons for missing appointments. Questionnaire data supported these findings and showed that respondents perceived diabetes to have only mildly serious consequence and cause limited concern and emotional impact. Participants' understanding of their condition and perceptions of personal control and treatment control were low. Gender, perceived behavioural control and emotional representations were significantly associated with the number of appointments missed in the previous year. CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the importance of psychological variables in predicting non-attendance at diabetes appointments and provide avenues for how non-attendance might be tackled.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Pacientes não Comparecentes/psicologia , Pesquisadores/psicologia , Atitude Frente a Saúde , Estudos Transversais , Diabetes Mellitus/psicologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/psicologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/terapia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/psicologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Feminino , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Participação do Paciente , Grupo Associado , Inquéritos e Questionários
6.
J Eval Clin Pract ; 25(5): 843-849, 2019 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30677196

RESUMO

RATIONALE, AIMS, AND OBJECTIVES: The literature suggests that discrete choice experiments (DCEs) are a preferable method for estimating willingness-to-pay (WTP) values, as they may avoid some biases often observed in contingent valuation surveys, such as protest and strategic behaviour. However, the choice studies have demonstrated that attribute non-attendance may be a serious issue that leads to biased WTP estimates. METHOD: A DCE was used to estimate patients' WTP for dental care at the dental school clinic. The endogenous attribute attendance (EAA) model was used to estimate WTP for dental care attributes, while accounting for non-attendance to the cost attribute. RESULTS: The EAA model revealed that almost every second respondent had ignored the cost attribute when making choices, indicating that patients were very sensitive to other characteristics of dental care. Dental care providers should pay particular attention to providing a detailed explanation of treatment to their patients, as this was the most valued attribute of dental care. The welfare estimates from the EAA model, which accounted for non-attendance to the cost attribute, were more than two times lower than welfare estimates from a traditional multinomial logit model and mixed logit model estimated in WTP space. CONCLUSIONS: The findings raise concerns for derived WTP estimates in DCE studies that did not consider non-attendance to the cost attribute during the estimation process. Non-attendance to the cost attribute overestimates WTP values, even if being motivated by the true preferences of respondents.


Assuntos
Comportamento de Escolha , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Atenção à Saúde/economia , Assistência Odontológica , Pacientes não Comparecentes , Satisfação do Paciente , Assistência Odontológica/economia , Assistência Odontológica/organização & administração , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Pacientes não Comparecentes/economia , Pacientes não Comparecentes/psicologia
7.
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med ; 9(1): e1-e5, 2017 Mar 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28397521

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Access to health services is one of the Batho Pele ('people first') values and principles of the South African government since 1997. This necessitated some changes around public service systems, procedures, attitudes and behaviour. The challenges of providing health care to rural geographically spread populations include variations in socio-economic status, transport opportunities, access to appointment information and patient perceptions of costs and benefits of seeking health care. George hospital, situated in a rural area, serves 5000 outpatient visits monthly, with non-attendance rates of up to 40%. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this research was to gain a greater understanding of the reasons behind non-attendance of outpatient department clinics to allow locally driven, targeted interventions. METHODS: This was a descriptive study. We attempted to phone all patients who missed appointments over a 1-month period (n = 574). Only 20% were contactable with one person declining consent. Twenty-nine percent had no telephone number on hospital systems, 7% had incorrect numbers, 2% had died and 42% did not respond to three attempts. RESULTS: The main reasons for non-attendance included unaware of appointment date (16%), out of area (11%), confusion over date (11%), sick or admitted to hospital (10%), family member sick or died (7%), appointment should have been cancelled by clerical staff (6%) and transport (6%). Only 9% chose to miss their appointment. The other 24% had various reasons. CONCLUSIONS: Improved patient awareness of appointments, adjustments in referral systems and enabling appointment cancellation if indicated would directly improve over two-thirds of reasons for non-attendance. Understanding the underlying causes will help appointment planning, reduce wasted costs and have a significant impact on patient care.


Assuntos
Agendamento de Consultas , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Rurais/estatística & dados numéricos , Pacientes não Comparecentes/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pacientes não Comparecentes/psicologia , População Rural/estatística & dados numéricos , África do Sul , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto Jovem
8.
BMJ Open ; 7(2): e014120, 2017 02 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28196951

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Understanding the causes of low engagement in healthcare is a pre-requisite for improving health services' contribution to tackling health inequalities. Low engagement includes missing healthcare appointments. Serially (having a pattern of) missing general practice (GP) appointments may provide a risk marker for vulnerability and poorer health outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A proof of concept pilot using GP appointment data and a focus group with GPs informed the development of missed appointment categories: patients can be classified based on the number of appointments missed each year. The full study, using a retrospective cohort design, will link routine health service and education data to determine the relationship between GP appointment attendance, health outcomes, healthcare usage, preventive health activity and social circumstances taking a life course approach and using data from the whole journey in the National Health Service (NHS) healthcare. 172 practices will be recruited (∼900 000 patients) across Scotland. The statistical analysis will focus on 2 key areas: factors that predict patients who serially miss appointments, and serial missed appointments as a predictor of future patient outcomes. Regression models will help understand how missed appointment patterns are associated with patient and practice characteristics. We shall identify key factors associated with serial missed appointments and potential interactions that might predict them. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The results of the project will inform debates concerning how best to reduce non-attendance and increase patient engagement within healthcare systems. Significant non-academic beneficiaries include governments, policymakers and medical practitioners. Results will be disseminated via a combination of academic outputs (papers, conferences), social media and through collaborative public health/policy fora.


Assuntos
Agendamento de Consultas , Medicina Geral/estatística & dados numéricos , Pacientes não Comparecentes/estatística & dados numéricos , Grupos Focais , Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Registro Médico Coordenado , Pacientes não Comparecentes/psicologia , Projetos Piloto , Estudo de Prova de Conceito , Projetos de Pesquisa , Estudos Retrospectivos , Escócia , Populações Vulneráveis/estatística & dados numéricos
9.
BMJ Open ; 6(5): e010952, 2016 05 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27194319

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Non-attendance at diabetic retinopathy screening has financial implications for screening programmes and potential clinical costs to patients. We sought to identify explanations for why patients had never attended a screening appointment (never attendance) in one programme. DESIGN: Qualitative analysis of a service evaluation. SETTING: One South London (UK) diabetic eye screening programme. PARTICIPANTS AND PROCEDURE: Patients who had been registered with one screening programme for at least 18 months and who had never attended screening within the programme were contacted by telephone to ascertain why this was the case. Patients' general practices were also contacted for information about why each patient may not have attended. Framework analysis was used to interpret responses. RESULTS: Of the 296 patients, 38 were not eligible for screening and of the 258 eligible patients, 159 were not contactable (31 of these had phone numbers that were not in use). We obtained reasons from patients/general practices/clinical notes for non-attendance for 146 (57%) patients. A number of patient-level and system-level factors were given to explain non-attendance. Patient-level factors included having other commitments, being anxious about screening, not engaging with any diabetes care and being misinformed about screening. System-level factors included miscommunication about where the patient lives, their clinical situation and practical problems that could have been overcome had their existence been shared between programmes. CONCLUSIONS: This service evaluation provides unique insight into the patient-level and system-level reasons for never attendance at diabetic retinopathy screening. Improved sharing of relevant information between providers has the potential to facilitate increased uptake of screening. Greater awareness of patient-level barriers may help providers offer a more accessible service.


Assuntos
Atenção à Saúde/normas , Retinopatia Diabética/diagnóstico , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Pacientes não Comparecentes/psicologia , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Ansiedade/etiologia , Criança , Comunicação , Atenção à Saúde/economia , Retinopatia Diabética/psicologia , Feminino , Medicina Geral , Humanos , Londres , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento/psicologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Adulto Jovem
10.
Behav Cogn Psychother ; 44(1): 118-22, 2016 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24933408

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Initial therapy appointments have high nonattendance rates yet the reasons remain poorly understood. AIMS: This study aimed to identify positive and negative attitudes towards therapy that predicted initial attendance, informed by a perceptual control theory account of approach-avoidance conflicts in help-seeking. METHOD: A prospective study was conducted within a low intensity CBT service using first appointment attendance (n = 96) as an outcome. Measures included attitudes towards therapy, depression and anxiety scales, and demographic variables. RESULTS: Endorsement of a negative attitude item representing concern about self-disclosure was independently predictive of nonattendance. Positive attitudes predicted increased attendance, especially endorsement of motives for self-reflection, but only among less depressed individuals. CONCLUSIONS: Self-disclosure concerns contribute to therapy avoidance and having goals for self-reflection may represent approach motivation for therapy; however, the latter has less impact among more highly depressed people.


Assuntos
Agendamento de Consultas , Aprendizagem da Esquiva , Pacientes não Comparecentes/psicologia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/psicologia , Adulto , Transtornos de Ansiedade/psicologia , Transtornos de Ansiedade/terapia , Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental , Transtorno Depressivo/psicologia , Transtorno Depressivo/terapia , Feminino , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Motivação , Estudos Prospectivos , Autorrevelação , Inquéritos e Questionários
11.
J Child Neurol ; 30(10): 1295-9, 2015 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25503257

RESUMO

Missed clinic appointments lead to decreased patient access, worse patient outcomes, and increased healthcare costs. The goal of this pilot study was to identify reasons for and risk factors associated with missed pediatric neurology outpatient appointments ("no-shows"). This was a prospective cohort study of patients scheduled for 1 week of clinic. Data on patient clinical and demographic information were collected by record review; data on reasons for missed appointments were collected by phone interviews. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted using chi-square tests and multiple logistic regression to assess risk factors for missed appointments. Fifty-nine (25%) of 236 scheduled patients were no-shows. Scheduling conflicts (25.9%) and forgetting (20.4%) were the most common reasons for missed appointments. When controlling for confounding factors in the logistic regression, Medicaid (odds ratio 2.36), distance from clinic, and time since appointment was scheduled were associated with missed appointments. Further work in this area is needed.


Assuntos
Neurologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Pacientes não Comparecentes/estatística & dados numéricos , Pacientes Ambulatoriais/estatística & dados numéricos , Pediatria/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Medicaid , Análise Multivariada , Pacientes não Comparecentes/psicologia , Pacientes Ambulatoriais/psicologia , Projetos Piloto , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA