Outcomes in endocrine cancer surgery are affected by racial, economic, and healthcare system demographics.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Surgeon experience has been recognized in several clinical fields as a significant element of superior management outcomes. In this study, we seek to assess the association between surgeon volume and patients' community health status with the outcomes of thyroid and parathyroid surgery indicated for primary malignancies. STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional study utilizing the State Inpatient Databases, 2010-2011, for Florida, New York, and Washington was merged with the County Health Rankings database. METHODS: International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes were used to identify adult (≥18 years) patients who underwent thyroidectomy or parathyroidectomy indicated for primary malignancies. RESULTS: A total of 6,347 records were included. Compared to high-volume surgeons, patients treated by low-volume surgeons were more likely to develop postoperative complications in the 1-month period after the operation (odds ratio: 4.34, 95% confidence interval: 3.31-5.70, P < .001). Furthermore, both low- and intermediate-volume surgeons were associated with a longer hospital stay (>2 days) and a higher risk of admission to the intensive care unit (P < .01 each). Cost of health services was significantly in the highest quartile (>$10,254.66) for patients treated by low-volume surgeons (P < .001). Patients who lived in communities of poor health measures had a higher risk of postoperative complications (16.3% vs. 11.8%, P = .030) independent of the clinical presentation and management type. Patients living in high health-risk communities and those of black and Hispanic backgrounds were more likely to be treated by low-volume surgeons (P < .001 each). CONCLUSIONS: The surgeon's volume and the patient's living conditions are crucial and independent factors in multiple aspects of endocrine cancer management. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 126:775-781, 2016.

Clinical outcomes after parathyroidectomy in a nationwide cohort of patients on hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Patients receiving dialysis undergo parathyroidectomy to improve laboratory parameters in resistant hyperparathyroidism with the assumption that clinical outcomes will also improve. However, no randomized clinical trial data demonstrate the benefits of parathyroidectomy. This study aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes up to 1 year after parathyroidectomy in a nationwide sample of patients receiving hemodialysis. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Using data from the US Renal Data System, this study identified prevalent hemodialysis patients aged ≥18 years with Medicare as primary payers who underwent parathyroidectomy from 2007 to 2009. Baseline characteristics and comorbid conditions were assessed in the year preceding parathyroidectomy; clinical events were identified in the year preceding and the year after parathyroidectomy. After parathyroidectomy, patients were censored at death, loss of Medicare coverage, kidney transplant, change in dialysis modality, or 365 days. This study estimated cause-specific event rates for both periods and rate ratios comparing event rates in the postparathyroidectomy versus preparathyroidectomy periods. RESULTS: Of 4435 patients who underwent parathyroidectomy, 2.0% died during the parathyroidectomy hospitalization and the 30 days after discharge. During the 30 days after discharge, 23.8% of patients were rehospitalized; 29.3% of these patients required intensive care. In the year after parathyroidectomy, hospitalizations were higher by 39%, hospital days by 58%, intensive care unit admissions by 69%, and emergency room/observation visits requiring hypocalcemia treatment by 20-fold compared with the preceding year. Cause-specific hospitalizations were higher for acute myocardial infarction (rate ratio, 1.98; 95% confidence interval, 1.60 to 2.46) and dysrhythmia (rate ratio 1.4; 95% confidence interval1.16 to 1.78); fracture rates did not differ (rate ratio 0.82; 95% confidence interval 0.6 to 1.1). CONCLUSIONS: Parathyroidectomy is associated with significant morbidity in the 30 days after hospital discharge and in the year after the procedure. Awareness of clinical events will assist in developing evidence-based risk/benefit determinations for the indication for parathyroidectomy.

The fall and rise of parathyroidectomy in U.S. hemodialysis patients, 1992 to 2002.

Although the therapeutic approach to managing hyperparathyroidism has changed dramatically, it is unknown whether parathyroidectomy rates continue to decline in the United States. Parathyroidectomy rates were studied in successive annual national cohorts, prevalent on hemodialysis on January 1 of 1992 to 2002, with Medicare as primary payer. Parathyroidectomy was defined as International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification code 068. The annual incidence of parathyroidectomy was 11.6 per 1000 patient-years in 1992. The incidence declined progressively after 1994, reaching a low of 6.8 per 1000 patient-years in 1998. Rates increased progressively after 1998, reaching 11.8 per 1000 patient-years in 2002. Using proportional hazards modeling, with adjustment for comorbidity and 1992 as the reference group, the lowest adjusted hazards ratio, 0.32 (P < 0.0001), was seen in 1998, followed by hazards ratios of 0.39 (P < 0.0001) in 1999, 0.41 (P < 0.0001) in 2000, 0.52 (P < 0.0001) in 2001, and 0.53 (P < 0.0001) in 2002. Other antecedents of parathyroidectomy in multivariate models included ESRD network, younger age, female gender, white race, absence of diabetes, longer duration of previous hemodialysis, use of intravenous vitamin D, previous renal transplantation, several comorbid conditions, and parathyroid hormone measurement in the preceding year. With a case-control method, parathyroidectomy was associated with higher mortality rates immediately after surgery, followed, subsequently, by lower long-term rates. Parathyroidectomy rates in U.S. hemodialysis patients increased between 1998 and 2002, a period in which the therapeutic armamentarium for preventing severe hyperparathyroidism expanded considerably.