Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 416
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev ; 25(6): 1929-1934, 2024 Jun 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38918653

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Exposure to noise by generation of free radicals causes oxidative stress in body. The aim of this study was the evaluation of oxidative stress in workers who have used hearing protection devices during working time. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Pressing workers (n=24) of a home appliance industry were studied using hearing protection devices to reduce noise exposure. Twenty two office staff (without exposure to noise) were considered as a control group. Two groups were matched for age, work experience and smoking. Exposure to noise was measured by dosimeter method at workstations. By obtaining 3 ml blood sample, Malondialdehyde levels, Thiol groups and total antioxidant capacity were evaluated in all subjects. RESULTS: Exposure to sound pressure level in pressing workers by considering the noise reduction factor of the earplug was observed in 77.65 dB with minimum 75.1 dB and Maximum 81.22 dB. Plasma thiol groups (0.076 (0.041-0.119) vs (0.110 (0.076-0.197), mmol/l P =0.0001) and total antioxidant capacity (361.33± 54.65 vs 414.14± 96.82, µmol/ml P = 0.026) in pressing workers significantly decreased than control group. Pearson correlation showed significant results between exposure to noise and oxidative stress parameters. CONCLUSION: Exposure to noise wave cause oxidative stress in different site of body. Oxidative stress is an intermediate way for different disease due to noise exposure. Reducing of noise exposure by earplug in pressing workers is not efficient protection for oxidative stress generation. Therefore, hearing protection devices are not a barrier to the harmful effects of noise in occupational exposure.


Assuntos
Dispositivos de Proteção das Orelhas , Ruído Ocupacional , Exposição Ocupacional , Estresse Oxidativo , Humanos , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Exposição Ocupacional/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Masculino , Ruído Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Perda Auditiva Provocada por Ruído/prevenção & controle , Perda Auditiva Provocada por Ruído/etiologia , Antioxidantes/metabolismo , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Seguimentos , Malondialdeído/sangue , Feminino , Doenças Profissionais/prevenção & controle , Doenças Profissionais/etiologia , Indústrias , Prognóstico
3.
Ann Work Expo Health ; 68(7): 765-769, 2024 Aug 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38772380

RESUMO

Previous studies have investigated the health hazards caused by exposure to the noise of heavy equipment used at construction sites. Korea's Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport operates a registration system for construction machinery, and regular safety inspections are mandatory. Although workers inspecting construction machinery vehicles are exposed to unwanted noise, no noise exposure assessment has been made regarding these workers in Korea. The time-weighted average (TWA) daily average noise exposure level among construction machinery inspectors at 18 inspection centers was 75.3 dB(A). Among the inspection steps, the exhaust gas inspection step was found to exhibit the highest noise exposure level, up to 100 dB(A). In Korea, if the noise level of a workplace exceeds 85 dB(A) as a TWA, workers are required to undergo special medical examinations. This study found that special medical examinations were required for two of the 18 target inspection centers (approximately 115 workers) as the 8-hour TWA noise level exceeded 85 dB(A). Therefore, regular noise exposure assessment and special medical examinations for noise are required to prevent inspectors from developing hearing disorders due to noise exposure.


Assuntos
Indústria da Construção , Ruído Ocupacional , Exposição Ocupacional , Humanos , República da Coreia , Ruído Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Exposição Ocupacional/análise , Adulto , Monitoramento Ambiental/métodos , Monitoramento Ambiental/normas , Perda Auditiva Provocada por Ruído/etiologia , Perda Auditiva Provocada por Ruído/prevenção & controle , Masculino
4.
Int J Mol Sci ; 25(10)2024 May 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38791192

RESUMO

The synapses between inner hair cells (IHCs) and spiral ganglion neurons (SGNs) are the most vulnerable structures in the noise-exposed cochlea. Cochlear synaptopathy results from the disruption of these synapses following noise exposure and is considered the main cause of poor speech understanding in noisy environments, even when audiogram results are normal. Cochlear synaptopathy leads to the degeneration of SGNs if damaged IHC-SGN synapses are not promptly recovered. Oxidative stress plays a central role in the pathogenesis of cochlear synaptopathy. C-Phycocyanin (C-PC) has antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities and is widely utilized in the food and drug industry. However, the effect of the C-PC on noise-induced cochlear damage is unknown. We first investigated the therapeutic effect of C-PC on noise-induced cochlear synaptopathy. In vitro experiments revealed that C-PC reduced the H2O2-induced generation of reactive oxygen species in HEI-OC1 auditory cells. H2O2-induced cytotoxicity in HEI-OC1 cells was reduced with C-PC treatment. After white noise exposure for 3 h at a sound pressure of 118 dB, the guinea pigs intratympanically administered 5 µg/mL C-PC exhibited greater wave I amplitudes in the auditory brainstem response, more IHC synaptic ribbons and more IHC-SGN synapses according to microscopic analysis than the saline-treated guinea pigs. Furthermore, the group treated with C-PC had less intense 4-hydroxynonenal and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 staining in the cochlea compared with the saline group. Our results suggest that C-PC improves cochlear synaptopathy by inhibiting noise-induced oxidative stress and the inflammatory response in the cochlea.


Assuntos
Cóclea , Molécula 1 de Adesão Intercelular , Ruído , Estresse Oxidativo , Ficocianina , Sinapses , Animais , Estresse Oxidativo/efeitos dos fármacos , Cobaias , Ficocianina/farmacologia , Ficocianina/uso terapêutico , Cóclea/metabolismo , Cóclea/efeitos dos fármacos , Cóclea/patologia , Sinapses/efeitos dos fármacos , Sinapses/metabolismo , Ruído/efeitos adversos , Molécula 1 de Adesão Intercelular/metabolismo , Perda Auditiva Provocada por Ruído/tratamento farmacológico , Perda Auditiva Provocada por Ruído/metabolismo , Perda Auditiva Provocada por Ruído/patologia , Espécies Reativas de Oxigênio/metabolismo , Masculino , Gânglio Espiral da Cóclea/efeitos dos fármacos , Gânglio Espiral da Cóclea/metabolismo , Gânglio Espiral da Cóclea/patologia , Peróxido de Hidrogênio/metabolismo , Células Ciliadas Auditivas Internas/efeitos dos fármacos , Células Ciliadas Auditivas Internas/metabolismo , Células Ciliadas Auditivas Internas/patologia , Antioxidantes/farmacologia , Linhagem Celular , Perda Auditiva Oculta
5.
Radiography (Lond) ; 30(3): 889-895, 2024 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38603992

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Acoustic noise from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can cause hearing loss and needs to be mitigated to ensure the safety of patients and personnel. Capturing MR personnel's insights is crucial for guiding the development and future applications of noise-reduction technology. This study aimed to explore how MR radiographers manage acoustic noise in clinical MR settings. METHODS: Using a qualitative design, we conducted semi-structured individual interviews with fifteen MR radiographers from fifteen hospitals around Sweden. We focused on the clinical implications of participants' noise management, using an interpretive description approach. We also identified sociotechnical interactions between People, Environment, Tools, and Tasks (PETT) by adopting a Human Factors/Ergonomics framework. Interview data were analyzed inductively with thematic analysis (Braun and Clarke). RESULTS: The analysis generated three main themes regarding MR radiographers' noise management: (I) Navigating Occupational Noise: Risk Management and Adaptation; (II) Protecting the Patient and Serving the Exam, and (III) Establishing a Safe Healthcare Environment with Organizational Support. CONCLUSION: This study offers insights into radiographers' experiences of managing acoustic noise within MRI, and the associated challenges. Radiographers have adopted multiple strategies to protect patients and themselves from adverse noise-related effects. However, they require tools and support to manage this effectively, suggesting a need for organizations to adopt more proactive, holistic approaches to safety initiatives. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The radiographers stressed the importance of a soundproofed work environment to minimize occupational adverse health effects and preserve work performance. They acknowledge noise as a common contributor to patient distress and discomfort. Providing options like earplugs, headphones, mold putty, software-optimized "quiet" sequences, and patient information were important tools. Fostering a safety culture requires proactive safety efforts and support from colleagues and management.


Assuntos
Entrevistas como Assunto , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Ruído Ocupacional , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Humanos , Suécia , Feminino , Masculino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Perda Auditiva Provocada por Ruído/prevenção & controle , Exposição Ocupacional/prevenção & controle , Gestão de Riscos
6.
S Afr J Commun Disord ; 70(1): e1-e9, 2023 Nov 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38044863

RESUMO

BACKGROUND:  The South African Noise Induced Hearing Loss (NIHL) Regulations, mandates employers to conduct a noise risk assessment, which records specific variables for determining the status of exposure and the need for implementation of control measures. OBJECTIVES:  The study evaluated company noise risk assessment practices for alignment with legal requirements and specific risk assessment guidelines. METHOD:  Convenience sampling was used to select the four manufacturing and utilities companies that participated in the study. The participating companies submitted latest noise risk assessment records for evaluation through the READ approach. RESULTS:  The noise risk assessment records of three of the four companies omitted the recording of factors such as the reasonable deterioration in or failure of control measures, adequate control and formalisation of hearing conservation programmes (HCPs). When evaluated against the South African National Standard 31000 Risk Assessment guidelines, the risk assessment processes of the respective companies were lacking in addressing aspects related to establishing communication and consultation, evaluation, adapting, continually improving, leadership and commitment, and integration. CONCLUSION:  The recorded information on the noise risk assessment reports from the four participating companies were incomplete, negatively affecting subsequent HCP management processes and decision-making. Future studies should investigate other aspects such as the implementation status of recommended noise controls as well as their effectiveness as recorded in the noise risk assessment records.Contribution: This study provided firsthand insights of company noise risk assessment practices, specifically identifying functional and technical areas requiring improvement to enhance current efforts directed towards the minimisation of NIHL within HCPs. The study highlighted that the current practices on recording noise risk assessment information remain incomplete, adversely diminishing the impact of the assessment as an important decision-making tool. The identified technical issues specifically, when addressed, will increase trust on the decisions derived from noise risk assessments.


Assuntos
Perda Auditiva Provocada por Ruído , Doenças Profissionais , Humanos , África do Sul , Doenças Profissionais/diagnóstico , Doenças Profissionais/prevenção & controle , Ruído , Perda Auditiva Provocada por Ruído/diagnóstico , Perda Auditiva Provocada por Ruído/etiologia , Perda Auditiva Provocada por Ruído/prevenção & controle , Medição de Risco
8.
J Vis Exp ; (192)2023 02 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36847397

RESUMO

An animal model of noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) is useful for pathologists, therapists, pharmacologists, and hearing researchers to thoroughly understand the mechanism of NIHL, and subsequently optimize the corresponding treatment strategies. This study aims to create an improved protocol for developing a mouse model of NIHL. Male C57BL/6J mice were used in this study. Unanesthetized mice were exposed to loud noises (1 and 6 kHz, presented simultaneously at 115-125 dB SPL-A) continuously for 6 h per day for 5 consecutive days. Auditory function was assessed 1 day and 1 week after noise exposure, using auditory brainstem response (ABR). After the ABR measurement, the mice were sacrificed, and their organs of Corti were collected for immunofluorescence staining. From the auditory brainstem response (ABR) measurements, significant hearing loss was observed 1 day after noise exposure. After 1 week, the hearing thresholds of the experimental mice decreased to ~80 dB SPL, which was still a significantly higher level than the control mice (~40 dB SPL). From the results of immunofluorescence imaging, outer hair cells (OHCs) were shown to be damaged. In summary, we created a model of NIHL using male C57BL/6J mice. A new and simple device for generating and delivering pure-tone noise was developed and then employed. Quantitative measurements of hearing thresholds and morphological confirmation of OHC damage both demonstrated that the applied noise successfully induced an expected hearing loss.


Assuntos
Perda Auditiva Provocada por Ruído , Masculino , Camundongos , Animais , Perda Auditiva Provocada por Ruído/etiologia , Células Ciliadas Auditivas Externas , Camundongos Endogâmicos C57BL , Audição/fisiologia , Ruído/efeitos adversos , Limiar Auditivo/fisiologia , Cóclea/fisiologia
9.
Int J Occup Med Environ Health ; 36(1): 125-138, 2023 Mar 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36661863

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: It has been shown that monitoring temporary threshold shift (TTS) after exposure to noise may have a predictive value for susceptibility of developing permanent noise-induced hearing loss. The aim of this study is to present the assumptions of the TTS predictive model after its verification in normal hearing subjects along with demonstrating the usage of this model for the purposes of public health policy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The existing computational predictive TTS models were adapted and validated in a group of 18 bartenders exposed to noise at the workplace. The performance of adapted TTS predictive model was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The demonstration example of the usage of this model for estimating the risk of TTS in general unscreened population after exposure to loud music in discotheque bars or music clubs is provided. RESULTS: The adapted TTS predictive model shows a satisfactory agreement in distributions of actual and predicted TTS values and good correlations between these values in examined bartenders measured at 4 kHz, and as a mean at speech frequencies (0.5-4 kHz). An optimal cut-off level for recognizing the TTS events, ca. 75% of young people (aged ca. 35 years) may experience TTS >5 dB, while <10% may exhibit TTS of 15-18 dB. CONCLUSIONS: The final TTS predictive model proposed in this study needs to be validated in larger groups of subjects exposed to noise. Actual prediction of TTS episodes in general populations may become a helpful tool in creating the hearing protection public health policy. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2023;36(1):125-38.


Assuntos
Perda Auditiva Provocada por Ruído , Ruído , Humanos , Adolescente , Idoso , Audição , Perda Auditiva Provocada por Ruído/epidemiologia , Aclimatação , Política de Saúde
10.
Int J Occup Saf Ergon ; 29(2): 528-537, 2023 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36715312

RESUMO

Experience shows the occurrence of situations when the measurements of impulse noise parameters are made with measurement equipment unsuitable for such conditions. The results of using such equipment were compared with the results of using equipment with a sufficiently large upper limit of the measurement range. The analysis was carried out on the example of noise generated during shots from a Mossberg smooth-bore shotgun and AKM rifle, as well as produced in the forge. The use of the unsuitable equipment allowed to indicate the exceeding of the exposure limit value of the peak value of the signal (LCpeak), but this is not always possible when determining the energy properties of the signal (LEX,8h). While the inadequate properties of the measurement equipment will generally not prevent the conclusion that noise in a particular workplace is hazardous to hearing, the results of measurements cannot be used to select hearing protectors.


Assuntos
Perda Auditiva Provocada por Ruído , Ruído Ocupacional , Humanos , Perda Auditiva Provocada por Ruído/prevenção & controle , Dispositivos de Proteção das Orelhas , Ruído/efeitos adversos , Ruído/prevenção & controle , Audição , Local de Trabalho , Ruído Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Ruído Ocupacional/prevenção & controle
12.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 280(6): 2763-2772, 2023 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36525077

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To explore the diagnostic auditory indicators of high noise exposure and combine them into a diagnostic model of high noise exposure and possible development of hidden hearing loss (HHL). METHODS: We recruited 101 young adult subjects and divided them according to noise exposure history into high-risk and low-risk groups. All subjects completed demographic characteristic collection (including age, noise exposure, self-reported hearing status, and headset use) and related hearing examination. RESULTS: The 8 kHz (P = 0.039) and 10 kHz (P = 0.005) distortion product otoacoustic emission amplitudes (DPOAE) (DPs) in the high-risk group were lower than those in the low-risk group. The amplitudes of the summating potential (SP) (P = 0.017) and action potential (AP) (P = 0.012) of the electrocochleography (ECochG) in the high-risk group were smaller than those in the low-risk group. The auditory brainstem response (ABR) wave III amplitude in the high-risk group was higher than that in the low-risk group. When SNR = - 7.5 dB (P = 0.030) and - 5 dB (P = 0.000), the high-risk group had a lower speech discrimination score than that of the low-risk group. The 10 kHz DPOAE DP, ABR wave III amplitude and speech discrimination score under noise with SNR = - 5 dB were combined to construct a combination diagnostic indicator. The area under the ROC curve was 0.804 (95% CI 0.713-0.876), the sensitivity was 80.39%, and the specificity was 68.00%. CONCLUSIONS: We expect that high noise exposure can be detected early with this combined diagnostic indicator to prevent HHL or sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER/DATE OF REGISTRATION: ChiCTR2200057989, 2022/3/25.


Assuntos
Surdez , Perda Auditiva Provocada por Ruído , Perda Auditiva Neurossensorial , Perda Auditiva , Ruído Ocupacional , Adulto Jovem , Humanos , Audição/fisiologia , Ruído Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Emissões Otoacústicas Espontâneas , Audiometria , Perda Auditiva Neurossensorial/diagnóstico , Potenciais Evocados Auditivos do Tronco Encefálico/fisiologia , Limiar Auditivo , Perda Auditiva Provocada por Ruído/diagnóstico , Perda Auditiva Provocada por Ruído/etiologia
13.
Wei Sheng Yan Jiu ; 51(6): 904-910, 2022 Nov.
Artigo em Chinês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36539866

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the noise exposure and hearing loss of workers in railway transportation equipment manufacturing enterprises, and to assess the risk of hearing loss caused by noise. METHODS: From 2018 to 2020, an investigation was carried out on 3 railway transportation equipment manufacturing enterprises in Hubei Province and Hunan Province. A total of 840 noise-exposed workers were selected, the individual noise exposure level(L_(Aeq·8 h)) and hearing loss level were measured, the cumulative noise exposure(CNE) was calculated, and the relationship between hearing loss and technological process, working time and CNE were analyzed. ISO1999:2013 was used to calculate the change of hearing threshold and the risk of noise-induced hearing loss after 40 years old. RESULTS: The median age of workers was 32 years old, and the median working age for noise exposure was 10 years. The distribution of positions is mainly welding, machining, assembly and painting.79.5%(120/151) of the individual noise exposure doses exceeded 85 dB(A), and the average L_(Aeq.8 h) was 89.9(A). There were significant differences in the proportion of hearing loss among workers in different process units(χ~2= 29.597, P<0.001), and the proportion of hearing loss in the preparation and steel structure units was higher. The proportion of hearing loss showed an upward trend with the increase of working years(χ~2=164.462, P<0.001), and the high-frequency combined speech-frequency hearing loss(26.7%) increased significantly after working for more than 20 years. With the increase of CNE, the proportion of high-frequency hearing loss and the proportion of high-frequency combined speech-frequency hearing loss increased accordingly(χ~2=192.544, P<0.001). The proportion of high frequency combined speech frequency hearing loss increased significantly in the group with CNE greater than 105 dB(A)·years. It is predicted that the risk of hearing loss caused by noise in assemblers appears earliest and the risk is the greatest. The risk of high noise-induced frequency hearing loss of assemblers was 3.6%-8.6% at the age of 40, 20.2% at the age of 50, 22.0% at the age of 60. The risk of high-frequency combined speech-frequency hearing loss of assemblers was 1.2%-6.2% at the age of 50 and 8.6% at the age of 60. CONCLUSION: The noise hazard is serious and widely distributed in railway transportation equipment manufacturing enterprises, and the proportion of hearing loss increases with the increase of working time and CNE. Although ISO1999:2013 predicts that there may be an underestimation of noise-induced hearing loss in workers, it can be used as an early warning of hearing loss to identify the potential risk of hearing loss in the population.


Assuntos
Perda Auditiva Provocada por Ruído , Ruído Ocupacional , Doenças Profissionais , Exposição Ocupacional , Humanos , Adulto , Criança , Perda Auditiva Provocada por Ruído/epidemiologia , Perda Auditiva Provocada por Ruído/etiologia , Ruído Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Medição de Risco , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , Doenças Profissionais/etiologia
14.
Wei Sheng Yan Jiu ; 51(6): 918-933, 2022 Nov.
Artigo em Chinês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36539868

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the risk of noise induced hearing loss among workers in petrochemical enterprises. METHODS: Number of workers exposed to noise were recruited from three petrochemical enterprises. The noise exposure level(L_(EX, W)) of the research objects was measured, their occupational history was investigated, and the audiometric testing was carried out. The ISO 1999:2013 model was used to calculate the change of hearing threshold level and the risk of hearing loss in each post, and compared the result of model with the result of the audiometric testing. RESULTS: The median of L_(EX, W) is range from 79.8 to 85.0 dB(A). L_(EX, W) among all posts were greater than 80 dB(A) except naphtha processing operators. The result of pure tone hearing threshold test showed that the prevalence of high-frequency hearing loss among workers exposed to noise was 12.8%. According to the classification of noise operation according to the maximum value of L_(EX, W), the operator for styrene dry gas combined unit is the only post that is extremely dangerous in the department of chemical, the other posts in the department of chemical and all posts in the department of public works are exposed to light and medium noise hazards, and 62.5% the external operators of the oil refining department are under heavy and extremely hazardous. According to the evaluation result of ISO 1999:2013, the risk of high-frequency hearing loss among workers in crude distillation unit, hydrogen production unit and the electricians of electrical system is high. The measured median of noise-induced pernament threshold shift(NIPTS) among male workers in different workstation was higher than the predicted median of NIPTS of ISO 1999, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.01), and the predicted values for four-fifths of positions were more than 10 dB lower than the measured value. CONCLUSION: The risk of noise induced hearing loss of workers in petrochemical enterprises is high.


Assuntos
Perda Auditiva Provocada por Ruído , Ruído Ocupacional , Doenças Profissionais , Exposição Ocupacional , Masculino , Humanos , Perda Auditiva Provocada por Ruído/epidemiologia , Perda Auditiva Provocada por Ruído/etiologia , Perda Auditiva de Alta Frequência , Limiar Auditivo , Ruído Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , Doenças Profissionais/etiologia , Medição de Risco , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos
15.
Wei Sheng Yan Jiu ; 51(4): 650-655, 2022 Jul.
Artigo em Chinês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36047273

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the risk of hearing loss caused by industrial noise exposure of welders and assemblers in a mechanical equipment manufacturing enterprise, and to explore the practical application and possible underestimation of ISO 1999∶2013(E) model. METHODS: A total of 829 noise-exposed male workers from a mechanical equipment manufacturing enterprise were selected as study subjects. The questionnaire survey was administered, and individual noise exposure level(L_(Aeq.8 h)) and hearing loss level were measured. The risk assessment method of ISO 1999∶2013(E) was used to calculate the change of hearing threshold level and the risk of noise-induced hearing loss. By comparing the median of permanent hearing threshold shift caused by actual noise with the median of ISO1999 predicted value, the reason of the difference between the predicted value of ISO 1999∶2013(E) model and the actual value was analyzed. RESULTS: The L_(Aeq.8 h )was 89.5 dB(A), 77.4%(n=62)of the individual noise exposure levels exceeded 85 dB(A), and 24.6% of the participants(n=829) had different degrees of hearing loss. There was significant difference in hearing loss rate between welding and assembly positions(χ~2=10.07, P<0.01). The risk of noise-induced high-frequency hearing loss of 90% welders was 11.2% at the age of 50, and 14.0% at the age of 60. The risk of noise-induced deafness of 90% welders was 4.3% at the age of 60. The risk of high noise-induced frequency hearing loss of 90% assemblers was at the range of 4.0%-9.0% at the age of 40, 20.8% at the age of 50, and 22.5% at the age of 60. The risk of noise-induced deafness of 90% assemblers was at the range of 1.4%-6.4% at the age of 50, and 9.0% at the age of 60. Compared with actual median of permanent hearing threshold shift, ISO1999∶2013(E) predictions underestimated the median of permanent hearing threshold shift at 10.7 dB. CONCLUSION: The noise hazards of welding and assembly positions in mechanical equipment manufacturing enterprises are high relatively. ISO1999∶2013(E) can be used to predict the risk of noise-induced hearing loss in workers, but attention should be paid to the risk underestimation of this model.


Assuntos
Surdez , Perda Auditiva Provocada por Ruído , Ruído Ocupacional , Doenças Profissionais , Exposição Ocupacional , Surdez/complicações , Perda Auditiva Provocada por Ruído/epidemiologia , Perda Auditiva Provocada por Ruído/etiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Ruído Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , Doenças Profissionais/etiologia , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Medição de Risco , Inquéritos e Questionários
16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35954774

RESUMO

Dental clinics are exposed to various uncomfortable noises. The aim of this study was to quantify the effectiveness of active noise control devices in dental treatment conditions. Two types of commercial headsets (Airpods Pro, QC30) and two types of dental headsets (Alltalk, Quieton Dental) were used for the experiment. Three sounds (high-speed handpiece, low-speed handpiece, and suction system) were measured at three different distances from the dental teeth model, typodont. The distances of 10, 40, and 70 cm reflected the positions of the patient, assistant, and practitioner's ears, respectively. Sound analysis was performed, and the significance of differences in the maximum noise level using each device was determined with the Kruskal−Wallis test. Dental noise was characterized by the peak in sound pressure level (SPL) at 4−5 kHz and >15 kHz frequencies. The commercial headsets efficiently blocked 1 kHz and 10 kHz of noise. The dental headsets efficiently reduced 4−6 and >15 kHz noise. Quieton had the highest maximum SPL in all situations and positions among the four devices. For a better dental clinic, however, active noise control devices more suitable for the characteristics of dental noise should be developed.


Assuntos
Perda Auditiva Provocada por Ruído , Ruído , Assistência Odontológica , Humanos , Ruído/prevenção & controle , Som , Fatores de Tempo
17.
Artigo em Chinês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35785897

RESUMO

Objective: To investigate the current situation of occupational exposure to noise among noise workers in an automobile manufacturing enterprise in Tianjin, understand the impact of noise on workers' nervous system and hearing, and assess the risk of hearing loss among noise workers. Methods: In May 2021, 3516 workers in an automobile manufacturing enterprise were investigated by using a self-made questionnaire"Noise Workers Questionnaire" and cluster sampling method. The occupational noise hygiene survey and occupational hazards detection were carried out in their workplaces. They were divided into noise exposure group and non-noise exposure group according to whether they were exposed to noise or not. The general characteristics, hearing and nervous system symptoms of the two groups of workers were compared, and the risk of hearing loss was assessed. Results: There were 758 workers in the noise exposure group, aged (26±5) years old, with a working age of 3.0 (2.0, 6.0) years exposed to noise. 2758 workers in the non-noise exposure group, aged (25±6) years old, with a working age of 2.0 (1.0, 4.0) years. There were statistically significant differences in the distribution of workers'education level, working age and memory loss between the two groups (χ(2)=37.98, 38.70, 5.20, P<0.05). The workers in the noise exposure group showed a decreasing trend of insomnia, dreaminess, sweating and fatigue with the increase of working age (χ(2trend)=6.16, 7.99, P<0.05). The risk classification of binaural high-frequency hearing loss for workers in all noise positions until the age of 50 and 60 was negligible, the risk of occupational noise deafness was low for workers in stamping and welding noise positions until the age of 60. Conclusion: The occupational noise exposed to automobile manufacturing workers may cause certain harm to their nervous and auditory systems. Noise protection measures should be taken to reduce the risk of hearing loss and occupational noise deafness.


Assuntos
Surdez , Perda Auditiva Provocada por Ruído , Ruído Ocupacional , Doenças Profissionais , Adulto , Automóveis , Perda Auditiva Provocada por Ruído/diagnóstico , Perda Auditiva Provocada por Ruído/epidemiologia , Humanos , Ruído Ocupacional/prevenção & controle , Doenças Profissionais/diagnóstico , Medição de Risco , Adulto Jovem
18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35457327

RESUMO

Evaluating risks associated with multiple occupational exposures is no easy task, especially when chemical and physical nuisances are combined. In most countries, public institutions have created databases, which gather extensive information on occupational exposures or work-related diseases. Unfortunately, these tools rarely integrate medical and exposure information, and, above all, do not take into account the possible adverse effects of co-exposures. Therefore, an attempt to exploit and join different existing databases for the assessment of the health effects of multiple exposures is described herein. This case study examines three French databases describing exposures to noise and/or ototoxic chemicals (i.e., toxic to the ear) and the incidence rate of occupational deafness in different sectors. The goals were (1) to highlight occupational sectors where the workers are the most (co)exposed and (2) to determine whether this approach could confirm the experimental data showing that this co-exposure increases the risk of developing hearing loss. The results present data per occupational sector exposing workers to noise only, ototoxic chemicals only, noise and ototoxic chemicals, and neither of these two nuisances. The ten sectors in which the proportion of exposed workers is the highest are listed. This analysis shows that the rate of hearing loss in these sectors is high but does not show an increased incidence of hearing loss in co-exposed sectors.


Assuntos
Perda Auditiva Provocada por Ruído , Ruído Ocupacional , Doenças Profissionais , Exposição Ocupacional , Ototoxicidade , Perda Auditiva Provocada por Ruído/epidemiologia , Perda Auditiva Provocada por Ruído/etiologia , Humanos , Ruído/efeitos adversos , Ruído Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Doenças Profissionais/induzido quimicamente , Doenças Profissionais/complicações , Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos
19.
Ann Work Expo Health ; 66(6): 794-807, 2022 07 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35259209

RESUMO

Noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) is the largest cause of action for indemnity in North American industries despite the widespread implementation of hearing conservation programs. Possible causes behind the onset of NIHL are the intervals between hearing tests which are generally too long and the tests are insufficiently sensitive to detect temporary hearing changes to act and prevent permanent hearing damage. Moreover, current noise regulations might be too lenient as to the permissible maximum noise levels. Short-interval hearing assessment could help to observe temporary changes in hearing health and prevent permanent damage. This study investigates the short-term effects of noise exposure characteristics using repeated measurements of otoacoustic emission (OAE) growth functions and presents the most significant predictors of hearing health changes as observed in sixteen individuals equipped with OAE earpieces. The experimental results of this study show that the impulsiveness and frequency spectrum of the noise level could be a possible cause of the decline in OAE levels. As a consequence, hearing conservation programs should consider taking these noise metrics into account for proper NIHL risk assessment. Such noise exposure and hearing health monitoring could greatly improve hearing conservation practices in the workplace by acting faster and eventually mitigate occupational hearing loss.


Assuntos
Perda Auditiva Provocada por Ruído , Exposição Ocupacional , Audição , Perda Auditiva Provocada por Ruído/diagnóstico , Testes Auditivos/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Emissões Otoacústicas Espontâneas
20.
Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi ; 40(12): 893-897, 2022 Dec 20.
Artigo em Chinês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36646479

RESUMO

Objective: To assess the risk of noise-induced hearing loss in workers from a petrochemical plant. Methods: In October 2020, 488 male workers exposed to noise in a petrochemical plant in Guangdong Province were selected by cluster sampling. Acoustics-Estimation of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss (ISO 1999: 2013) was used to assess the risk of noise-induced hearing loss of workers, and individual fit testing was used to evaluate the sound attenuation obtained by the workers. The risk assessment results and fitness test results of workers with different hearing levels were compared. Results: The average noise exposure equivalent sound level of the workers in the petrochemical plant was 86.7 dB (A) . The median of PARs (personal attenuation ratings) was 16 (4, 23) dB. There were statistically significant differences in age and service years among workers with different hearing results (P<0.05) , but no statistically significant differences in noise intensity and PARs (P>0.05) . According to risk assessment results of ISO 1999: 2013, the current risk of high-frequency hearing loss in 488 workers were negligible risk and acceptable risk. The risk of noise-induced deafness weredivided into three levels: negligible risk in 452 workers (92.7%) , medium risk in 27 workers (5.5%) and high risk in 9 workers (1.8%) . The risk of high-frequency hearing loss in next 5 to 15 years for workers with noise exposure level of >94 to 97 dB and >97 dB or above would be medium risk or above. The risk of noise-induced deafness in next 5 to 15 years for workers exposed to noise withlevel of 91 to 94 dB would be medium risk or above. Conclusion: The risk of noise-induced hearing loss in workers from the petrochemical plant is high in next 5 to 15 years, and noise prevention and control measures need to be strengthened. ISO1999: 2013 assessment method may underestimate the risk of hearing loss among workers.


Assuntos
Surdez , Perda Auditiva Provocada por Ruído , Ruído Ocupacional , Doenças Profissionais , Exposição Ocupacional , Humanos , Perda Auditiva Provocada por Ruído/epidemiologia , Perda Auditiva Provocada por Ruído/prevenção & controle , Perda Auditiva de Alta Frequência , Ruído Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Ruído Ocupacional/prevenção & controle , Medição de Risco , Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , Doenças Profissionais/prevenção & controle , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA