Noise risk assessment practices of four South African manufacturing and utilities companies.

BACKGROUND:  The South African Noise Induced Hearing Loss (NIHL) Regulations, mandates employers to conduct a noise risk assessment, which records specific variables for determining the status of exposure and the need for implementation of control measures. OBJECTIVES:  The study evaluated company noise risk assessment practices for alignment with legal requirements and specific risk assessment guidelines. METHOD:  Convenience sampling was used to select the four manufacturing and utilities companies that participated in the study. The participating companies submitted latest noise risk assessment records for evaluation through the READ approach. RESULTS:  The noise risk assessment records of three of the four companies omitted the recording of factors such as the reasonable deterioration in or failure of control measures, adequate control and formalisation of hearing conservation programmes (HCPs). When evaluated against the South African National Standard 31000 Risk Assessment guidelines, the risk assessment processes of the respective companies were lacking in addressing aspects related to establishing communication and consultation, evaluation, adapting, continually improving, leadership and commitment, and integration. CONCLUSION:  The recorded information on the noise risk assessment reports from the four participating companies were incomplete, negatively affecting subsequent HCP management processes and decision-making. Future studies should investigate other aspects such as the implementation status of recommended noise controls as well as their effectiveness as recorded in the noise risk assessment records.Contribution: This study provided firsthand insights of company noise risk assessment practices, specifically identifying functional and technical areas requiring improvement to enhance current efforts directed towards the minimisation of NIHL within HCPs. The study highlighted that the current practices on recording noise risk assessment information remain incomplete, adversely diminishing the impact of the assessment as an important decision-making tool. The identified technical issues specifically, when addressed, will increase trust on the decisions derived from noise risk assessments.

Development of an audiological assessment and diagnostic model for high occupational noise exposure.

PURPOSE: To explore the diagnostic auditory indicators of high noise exposure and combine them into a diagnostic model of high noise exposure and possible development of hidden hearing loss (HHL). METHODS: We recruited 101 young adult subjects and divided them according to noise exposure history into high-risk and low-risk groups. All subjects completed demographic characteristic collection (including age, noise exposure, self-reported hearing status, and headset use) and related hearing examination. RESULTS: The 8 kHz (P = 0.039) and 10 kHz (P = 0.005) distortion product otoacoustic emission amplitudes (DPOAE) (DPs) in the high-risk group were lower than those in the low-risk group. The amplitudes of the summating potential (SP) (P = 0.017) and action potential (AP) (P = 0.012) of the electrocochleography (ECochG) in the high-risk group were smaller than those in the low-risk group. The auditory brainstem response (ABR) wave III amplitude in the high-risk group was higher than that in the low-risk group. When SNR = - 7.5 dB (P = 0.030) and - 5 dB (P = 0.000), the high-risk group had a lower speech discrimination score than that of the low-risk group. The 10 kHz DPOAE DP, ABR wave III amplitude and speech discrimination score under noise with SNR = - 5 dB were combined to construct a combination diagnostic indicator. The area under the ROC curve was 0.804 (95% CI 0.713-0.876), the sensitivity was 80.39%, and the specificity was 68.00%. CONCLUSIONS: We expect that high noise exposure can be detected early with this combined diagnostic indicator to prevent HHL or sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER/DATE OF REGISTRATION: ChiCTR2200057989, 2022/3/25.

[Health hazards and hearing loss risk assessment of workers exposed to noise in an automobile manufacturing enterprise].

Objective: To investigate the current situation of occupational exposure to noise among noise workers in an automobile manufacturing enterprise in Tianjin, understand the impact of noise on workers＇ nervous system and hearing, and assess the risk of hearing loss among noise workers. Methods: In May 2021, 3516 workers in an automobile manufacturing enterprise were investigated by using a self-made questionnaire＂Noise Workers Questionnaire＂ and cluster sampling method. The occupational noise hygiene survey and occupational hazards detection were carried out in their workplaces. They were divided into noise exposure group and non-noise exposure group according to whether they were exposed to noise or not. The general characteristics, hearing and nervous system symptoms of the two groups of workers were compared, and the risk of hearing loss was assessed. Results: There were 758 workers in the noise exposure group, aged (26±5) years old, with a working age of 3.0 (2.0, 6.0) years exposed to noise. 2758 workers in the non-noise exposure group, aged (25±6) years old, with a working age of 2.0 (1.0, 4.0) years. There were statistically significant differences in the distribution of workers＇education level, working age and memory loss between the two groups (χ(2)=37.98, 38.70, 5.20, P<0.05). The workers in the noise exposure group showed a decreasing trend of insomnia, dreaminess, sweating and fatigue with the increase of working age (χ(2trend)=6.16, 7.99, P<0.05). The risk classification of binaural high-frequency hearing loss for workers in all noise positions until the age of 50 and 60 was negligible, the risk of occupational noise deafness was low for workers in stamping and welding noise positions until the age of 60. Conclusion: The occupational noise exposed to automobile manufacturing workers may cause certain harm to their nervous and auditory systems. Noise protection measures should be taken to reduce the risk of hearing loss and occupational noise deafness.

In Situ Otoacoustic Emission Monitoring to Assess the Effects of Noise Exposure on Hearing Health.

Noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) is the largest cause of action for indemnity in North American industries despite the widespread implementation of hearing conservation programs. Possible causes behind the onset of NIHL are the intervals between hearing tests which are generally too long and the tests are insufficiently sensitive to detect temporary hearing changes to act and prevent permanent hearing damage. Moreover, current noise regulations might be too lenient as to the permissible maximum noise levels. Short-interval hearing assessment could help to observe temporary changes in hearing health and prevent permanent damage. This study investigates the short-term effects of noise exposure characteristics using repeated measurements of otoacoustic emission (OAE) growth functions and presents the most significant predictors of hearing health changes as observed in sixteen individuals equipped with OAE earpieces. The experimental results of this study show that the impulsiveness and frequency spectrum of the noise level could be a possible cause of the decline in OAE levels. As a consequence, hearing conservation programs should consider taking these noise metrics into account for proper NIHL risk assessment. Such noise exposure and hearing health monitoring could greatly improve hearing conservation practices in the workplace by acting faster and eventually mitigate occupational hearing loss.

Audiometric assessment of hearing loss sustained during military service.

An analysis is presented of the audiograms, obtained using Telephonics TDH39 headphones (Huntington, NY), of 80 men claiming compensation for noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) sustained during military service. A comparison with an independent database of audiograms collected using other headphones suggested that no adjustment was needed to the hearing threshold levels (HTLs) at 6 kHz to allow for the use of TDH39 headphones. The method of Moore [(2020). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 148, 884-894] for diagnosing military noise-induced hearing loss (M-NIHL) gave a positive diagnosis for 92.5% of right ears and 97.5% of left ears. The mean HTLs were maximal and similar at 4, 6, and 8 kHz but with considerable individual variability. A comparison with age-expected HTLs showed that M-NIHL was typically greatest at 3, 4, 6, or 8 kHz but with considerable individual variability. M-NIHL values were positive from 0.5 to 8 kHz. The HTLs were significantly higher for the left than for the right ears, but the asymmetry varied across individuals and could usually be ascribed to specific features of the noise exposure. The asymmetry existed over the range from 0.5 to 8 kHz, supporting the idea that M-NIHL occurs over a wide frequency range. Tinnitus was reported by 76 of the 80 men.

South African hearing conservation programmes in the context of tele-audiology: A scoping review.

BACKGROUND: The limited involvement of audiologists in occupational noise-induced hearing loss (ONIHL) management through hearing conservation programmes (HCPs) is a global issue. In low- and middle-income (LAMI) countries such as South Africa, this is also exacerbated by demand versus capacity challenges. Tele-audiology is an option requiring serious deliberation by the audiology community within HCPs in LAMI contexts. OBJECTIVES: This scoping review explores if tele-audiology has a potential value in HCPs and reviews what has been documented in the literature on the use of tele-audiology in HCPs. METHOD: A scoping review was conducted using the Arksey and O'Malley's framework. A search was conducted in five electronic bibliographic databases including Science Direct, PubMed, Scopus Medline, ProQuest and Google Scholar and the grey literature to identify publications presenting considerations around tele-audiology in the implementation of HCPs. RESULTS: Findings revealed significant dearth of evidence specific to the use or application of tele-audiology in ONIHL and/or HCPs both within the African context and internationally, despite the purported potential benefit of this service delivery model, particularly in resource-constrained contexts such as LAMI countries. Of the publications deemed potentially relevant to this scoping review, none were found that specifically investigated or addressed the use of tele-audiology in ONIHL or HCPs as their main objective. Nuanced analysis of publications revealed that in the last decade, indication for potential growth in the use of tele-audiology within occupational audiology is indicated. CONCLUSION: Because of the significant demand versus capacity challenges in LAMI countries, and because of the need for scaling up audiology professionals' management of HCPs, careful consideration of teleaudiology as a platform to deliver services in these contexts is required.

Distortion product oto-acoustic emission: a superior tool for hearing assessment than pure tone audiometry.

OBJECTIVE: Hearing plays a crucial role in the performance of a soldier and is important for communication and speech processing. Service personnel are constantly exposed to high levels of noise and hence predisposed to occupational health disabilities, principally noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) and tinnitus. NIHL is a significantly common impairment in the military and can affect the warfare performances. Parochial awareness about the effects of uproarious noise which exacerbates their hearing, acceptance rate of use of hearing protection devices and follow-up audiological tests have become the major drawback for prevention of NIHL and are less pondered upon. METHOD: The present study focuses on the effects of noise on the hearing of service crew operating and maintaining military equipment and explores the efficacy of DPOAE's to substitute pure tone audiometry as a quick, easy to operate and implementable test technique for monitoring of hearing status. RESULTS: The results suggest that DPOAE test is important and more coherent than audiometry alone for the early detection of cochlear injury due to noise from military operations and efficacious for detecting NIHL.

[The importance of the quantitative assessment of the hearing impairment in the subjects employed under conditions of enhanced noise]. / Znachenie kolichestvennoi otsenki poteri slukha u lits, rabotaiushchikh v usloviiakh vozdeistviia povyshennoi shumovoi nagruzki.

The article describes the domestic modern diagnostic and expert approaches to the quantitative assessment of the hearing impairment in the subjects employed under conditions of enhanced occupational noise. It is concluded that the quantitative criteria for the determination of the severity of hearing loss in the workers of the 'noisy' professions adopted in this country are comparable with the respective international standards of and approaches to the medico-social examination practiced worldwide.

Incident Angle Correction Algorithm For Impulse Noise Injury Assessment.

Objectives: We developed an empirical algorithm to account for the effect of the change in the A-weighted sound exposure level (SELA) as a result of the change in angle of incidence (AoI) of the impulse noise on the prediction of hearing loss. The product is the upgraded software tool, Auditory 4.5 that incorporates the incident angle correction algorithm. Methods: The SELA calculated from free-field pressure data is used as the dose metric that was corrected for AoI. The angle-dependent eardrum pressure was measured by performing shock tube tests with the Acoustical Testing Fixture varied over a wide range of orientation angles. The yaw angle was varied from 0 to 360° and the pitch angle from -60° to +90° in 15° steps. The algorithm was constructed by calculating a correction factor, ΔSELA for any given AoI at the ear relative to the SELA at normal incidence. The ΔSELA values were applied to correct the dose values to predict injury for all AoI. Results: A three-dimensional contour of ΔSELA as a function of the AoI was produced. The largest ΔSELA was 9.81 dB at pitch = -15° and yaw = 255°. ΔSELA values compared well against available benchmark data. Conclusions: A new capability has been incorporated in Auditory 4.5 to predict the effects of AoI on impulse noise injury.

Noise-induced hearing loss - An examination of the methods of assessment in a cross-sectional study of 87 industrial workers.

OBJECTIVES: The surveillance of noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) according to the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) differs from the medico-legal criteria used to assess NIHL. Our study compares the two systems and proposes a novel method of simplifying the medico-legal criteria and applying it to ascertain noise-induced hearing loss. DESIGN: The anonymised audiograms of a group of 87 industrial workers from a single site were analysed with both methods. RESULTS: The comparison showed approximately one-third of the workers assessed in this study had their noise-induced hearing loss underestimated by the HSE criteria. The majority of these individuals were over 40 years of age. CONCLUSIONS: The HSE criteria for noise-induced hearing loss need review and re-alignment with the medico-legal criteria to address the discrepancy between the two systems.

Hearing testing in the U.S. Department of Defense: Potential impact on Veterans Affairs hearing loss disability awards.

Hearing loss is the second most common disability awarded by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to former members of the U.S. uniformed services. Hearing readiness and conservation practices differ among the four largest uniformed military services (Air Force, Army, Marine Corps, and Navy). Utilizing a data set consisting of all hearing loss claims submitted to the VA from fiscal years 2003-2013, we examined characteristics of veterans submitting claims within one year of separation from military service. Our results indicate that having a hearing loss disability claim granted was significantly more likely for men, individuals over the age of 26 years at the time of the claim, individuals most recently serving in the U.S. Army, and those with at least one hearing loss diagnosis. Importantly, individuals with at least one test record in the Defense Occupational and Environmental Health Readiness System-Hearing Conservation (DOEHRS-HC) system were significantly less likely to have a hearing loss disability claim granted by the VA. Within the DOEHRS-HC cohort, those with at least one threshold shift or clinical hearing loss diagnosis while on active duty were more than two and three times more likely to have a hearing loss disability claim granted, respectively. These findings indicate that an established history of reduced hearing ability while on active duty was associated with a significantly increased likelihood of an approved hearing loss disability claim relative to VA claims without such a history. Further, our results show a persistent decreased rate of hearing loss disability awards overall. These findings support increased inclusion of personnel in DoD hearing readiness and conservation programs to reduce VA hearing loss disability awards.

Percepção e conhecimento dos profissionais da saúde da atenção primária sobre notificação da perda auditiva induzida pelo ruído em Curitiba - Paraná / Primary care health professionals' perception and knowledge on notification of noise-induced hearing loss in Curitiba - Paraná

RESUMO Objetivo Analisar a percepção e o conhecimento dos profissionais de saúde que atuam na rede de Atenção Primária à Saúde do Município de Curitiba - Paraná sobre a notificação compulsória da Perda Auditiva Induzida pelo Ruído (PAIR) no, Sistema de Informação de Agravos de Notificação (SINAN). Método Utilizando como método o estudo transversal na cidade de Curitiba, analisando a percepção e o conhecimento dos profissionais de saúde que atuam na rede de Atenção Primária à Saúde do Município de Curitiba sobre a notificação compulsória da PAIR no SINAN. Aplicou-se ainda um questionário semiaberto em profissionais de saúde da atenção básica sobre conhecimento sobre a PAIR e sua notificação. Resultados Dos profissionais da atenção básica, 50% eram médicos com faixa etária de 26 a 30 anos. Dentre os profissionais, 56,2% relataram estarem preparados para identificar problemas de saúde relacionados ao trabalho, porém apenas 43,7% sentem-se aptos a identificar casos de PAIR. Entre as facilidades na notificação, relataram descentralização da assistência à saúde próxima à residência do usuário, encaminhamento para referência em medicina do trabalho e prontuário eletrônico na UBS; como dificuldades, relataram a não formação específica em saúde do trabalhador e falta de capacitação, tempo reduzido para consultas e receio. Conclusão os profissionais de saúde conhecem as características e sentem-se aptos para identificar os casos de PAIR, mas ainda não notificam os casos suspeitos de PAIR e não percebem a Saúde do Trabalhador como um programa institucionalizado fazendo parte do serviço.

ABSTRACT Objective The article aims to analyze the perception and knowledge of health professionals working in primary health care networks in the Municipality of Curitiba – Paraná, regarding the compulsory notification of Induced Hearing Loss Noise (NIHL) in the National Notifiable Diseases Information System (SINAN). Methods We performed a transversal cohort study in Curitiba, analyzing perception and knowledge of health professionals working in the primary health care networks in the Municipality of Curitiba, regarding the compulsory notification of NIHL in SINAN, from 2007 to 2014, featuring the reported cases and exploring the situational analysis of the NIHL notification, through a questionnaire and a structured news conference. Results The primary care professionals’ survey showed that 50% were doctors and the predominant age group was 26-30 years, with 56.2% reported as being able to identify health problems related to work, but only 43.7% feel able to identify cases of NIHL. Conclusion It was found that health professionals know the features and feel able to identify cases of NIHL, but still do not report suspected NIHL cases and do not consider occupational health an institutionalized program that is part of the service.

Primary care health professionals' perception and knowledge on notification of noise-induced hearing loss in Curitiba - Paraná. / Percepção e conhecimento dos profissionais da saúde da atenção primária sobre notificação da perda auditiva induzida pelo ruído em Curitiba - Paraná.

OBJECTIVE: The article aims to analyze the perception and knowledge of health professionals working in primary health care networks in the Municipality of Curitiba - Paraná, regarding the compulsory notification of Induced Hearing Loss Noise (NIHL) in the National Notifiable Diseases Information System (SINAN). METHODS: We performed a transversal cohort study in Curitiba, analyzing perception and knowledge of health professionals working in the primary health care networks in the Municipality of Curitiba, regarding the compulsory notification of NIHL in SINAN, from 2007 to 2014, featuring the reported cases and exploring the situational analysis of the NIHL notification, through a questionnaire and a structured news conference. RESULTS: The primary care professionals' survey showed that 50% were doctors and the predominant age group was 26-30 years, with 56.2% reported as being able to identify health problems related to work, but only 43.7% feel able to identify cases of NIHL. CONCLUSION: It was found that health professionals know the features and feel able to identify cases of NIHL, but still do not report suspected NIHL cases and do not consider occupational health an institutionalized program that is part of the service.

Speech perception in medico-legal assessment of hearing disabilities.

OBJECTIVE: Examination of Danish data for medico-legal compensations regarding hearing disabilities. The study purposes are: (1) to investigate whether discrimination scores (DSs) relate to patients' subjective experience of their hearing and communication ability (the latter referring to audio-visual perception), (2) to compare DSs from different discrimination tests (auditory/audio-visual perception and without/with noise), and (3) to relate different handicap measures in the scaling used for compensation purposes in Denmark. DESIGN: Data from a 15 year period (1999-2014) were collected and analysed. STUDY SAMPLE: The data set includes 466 patients, from which 50 were omitted due to suspicion of having exaggerated their hearing disabilities. RESULTS: The DSs relate well to the patients' subjective experience of their speech perception ability. By comparing DSs for different test setups it was found that adding noise entails a relatively more difficult listening condition than removing visual cues. The hearing and communication handicap degrees were found to agree, whereas the measured handicap degrees tended to be higher than the self-assessed handicap degrees. CONCLUSIONS: The DSs can be used to assess patients' hearing and communication abilities. The difference in the obtained handicap degrees emphasizes the importance of collecting self-assessed as well as measured handicap degrees.

[Occupational Hearing Loss (BK-No. 2301) - A Retrospective Analysis of 100 Consecutive Cases]. / Lärmschwerhörigkeit (BK-Nr. 2301) ­ Eine retrospektive Analyse von 100 konsekutiven Fällen.

Introduction: In order for a diagnosis of Occupational Hearing Loss (BK-no. 2301) to be made certain criteria must be fulfilled to establish that the hearing loss is occupational in origin. This work compares 2 groups, those who fulfil the criteria (BKE) and those who do not (BKNE). Methods: A 100 consecutive reports ("Lärmgutachten BK-no. 2301") written by the authors were examined retrospectively. These recorded audiometric examination, an analysis of any tinnitus and noise exposure plus use of hearing protection. Pre- and post-noise exposure status together with an expert assessment of work limitations was made to produce a 7 point score. Results: 67% of the group fulfilled the conditions for occupational hearing loss (9% were entitled to compensation). In the BKE group 82% showed typical audiometric signs of noise damage with 75% of them fulfilling at least 6 criteria of occupational disease no. 2301. Tinnitus typical for noise exposure was found in 26%. Discussion: A 7 point score could be useful in the future as a method of helping distinguish hearing loss and tinnitus from occupational as opposed to other causes.