Machine perfusion in liver transplantation: recent advances and coming challenges.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Machine perfusion has been adopted into clinical practice in Europe since the mid-2010s and, more recently, in the United States (US) following approval of normothermic machine perfusion (NMP). We aim to review recent advances, provide discussion of potential future directions, and summarize challenges currently facing the field. RECENT FINDINGS: Both NMP and hypothermic-oxygenated perfusion (HOPE) improve overall outcomes after liver transplantation versus traditional static cold storage (SCS) and offer improved logistical flexibility. HOPE offers additional protection to the biliary system stemming from its' protection of mitochondria and lessening of ischemia-reperfusion injury. Normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) is touted to offer similar protective effects on the biliary system, though this has not been studied prospectively.The most critical question remaining is the optimal use cases for each of the three techniques (NMP, HOPE, and NRP), particularly as HOPE and NRP become more available in the US. There are additional questions regarding the most effective criteria for viability assessment and the true economic impact of these techniques. Finally, with each technique purported to allow well tolerated use of riskier grafts, there is an urgent need to define terminology for graft risk, as baseline population differences make comparison of current data challenging. SUMMARY: Machine perfusion is now widely available in all western countries and has become an essential tool in liver transplantation. Identification of the ideal technique for each graft, optimization of viability assessment, cost-effectiveness analyses, and proper definition of graft risk are the next steps to maximizing the utility of these powerful tools.

Thoraco-abdominal normothermic regional perfusion for thoracic transplantation in the United States: current state and future directions.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To provide an update regarding the state of thoracoabdominal normothermic regional perfusion (taNRP) when used for thoracic organ recovery. RECENT FINDINGS: taNRP is growing in its utilization for thoracic organ recovery from donation after circulatory death donors, partly because of its cost effectiveness. taNRP has been shown to yield cardiac allograft recipient outcomes similar to those of brain-dead donors. Regarding the use of taNRP to recover donor lungs, United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) analysis shows that taNRP recovered lungs are noninferior, and taNRP has been used to consistently recover excellent lungs at high volume centers. Despite its growth, ethical debate regarding taNRP continues, though clinical data now supports the notion that there is no meaningful brain perfusion after clamping the aortic arch vessels. SUMMARY: taNRP is an excellent method for recovering both heart and lungs from donation after circulatory death donors and yields satisfactory recipient outcomes in a cost-effective manner. taNRP is now endorsed by the American Society of Transplant Surgeons, though ethical debate continues.

Advances in machine perfusion graft viability assessment in kidney, liver, pancreas, lung, and heart transplant.

Solid organ transplant constitutes the definitive treatment for end-stage organ failure. Better organ preservation methods have enabled use of marginal grafts, thereby expanding the donor pool to meet the growing demand for organs. Static cold storage as a preservation method has been superseded largely by machine perfusion in kidney transplant, with work regarding its use in other organ transplants ongoing. We hope that machine perfusion will allow better graft preservation, and pretransplant assessment, and optimization. The most extensive laboratory, preclinical, and clinical research into machine perfusion organ preservation has focused on kidneys. Successful outcomes in its use in renal transplant have sparked interest for its development and application to the liver, pancreas, heart, and lungs. This article reviews the current state of machine perfusion in abdominal and thoracic organ transplant, focusing on the recent developments in assessing graft viability.

Perfusion education in the United States at the turn of the century.

The challenges facing institutions charged with the delivery of health care have also affected the delivery of education in the health sciences. In the 30 years since the establishment of a process for formalized perfusion education, significant changes have shaped how the fundamentals of perfusion sciences are learned. The establishment and maintenance of a profession can only be secured through the creation of standards that guide educational facilities in the delivery of formalized instruction in a discipline. Perfusion education programs continue to meet these standards but are doing so at a time where resources continue to dwindle and quantitative assessment of manpower issues are fuzzy, at best. The peak of perfusion education programs occurred in 1994, and 5 years later only 25 programs were still accredited by the Committee on Accreditation of Allied Health Programs (CAAHEP). In the past decade, only one new education program has sought accreditation from CAAHEP. There were 41% fewer graduates in the United States in 1998 than in 1992, which follows a 6-year trend in declining numbers of individuals entering the field of perfusion. Individual programs are challenged by the reordering of university and community hospital structures, which often results in critical reviews of resource allocation to perfusion programs. The health of the perfusion profession remains deeply tied to the success of perfusion education programs. Likewise, the health of these programs can only be assured by means of continued solicitation of support and guidance from practitioners who serve as stewards of perfusion technology.