RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of testing for active matrix metalloproteinase-8 (aMMP-8) by a quantitative point-of-care (PoC), chairside lateral flow immunotest and azurocidin, in the peri-implant sulcular fluid (PISF), as biomarkers for the presence or absence of peri-implant diseases. BACKGROUND: Current research indicates that proinflammatory cytokines and extracellular matrix-degrading enzymes may be of value to diagnose and predict peri-implant disease initiation and progression, but more data are needed. METHODS: Eighty patients with implants were recruited. PISF samples were collected and quantitatively analyzed for aMMP-8 (chairside) and azurocidin with ELISA. Radiographic assessments and clinical indices (probing depth, probing attachment level, bleeding on probing, and plaque) were recorded after sampling. Kruskal-Wallis test and pairwise post hoc Dunn-Bonferroni test were used to relate aMMP-8 levels and azurocidin levels to clinical parameters. The diagnostic ability of aMMP-8 (ng/mL) and azurocidin was analyzed by receiver operator curve analysis. Area under the curve (AUC) was calculated and the Spearman's rho, and the coefficient of determination (R2) were used to calculate the correlations between aMMP-8, azurocidin, and periodontal parameters. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were observed for aMMP-8 levels but not for azurocidin between healthy implants, implants with mucositis, and those with peri-implantitis (13.65 ± 7.18, 32.33 ± 21.20, and 73.07 ± 43.93 ng/mL, respectively), (Kruskall-Wallis test p < .05). The aMMP-8 test with a threshold of 20 ng/mL has a sensitivity of 71.7% and a specificity of 77.8% to identify peri-implantitis and healthy implants, respectively. AUC was found to be 0.814, and the accuracy of the method reaches 73.8%. Above a cutoff value of 33.7 ng/mL of aMMP-8, the accuracy of the test to detect peri-implantitis reaches 77.5% in relation to 62.5% of BoP from the same site. CONCLUSION: Taken collectively, present data indicate that the aMMP-8 PoC lateral flow immunotest can be a beneficial, adjunctive diagnostic quantitative tool for real-time screening for peri-implant diseases.
Assuntos
Biomarcadores , Implantes Dentários , Líquido do Sulco Gengival , Metaloproteinase 8 da Matriz , Peri-Implantite , Humanos , Metaloproteinase 8 da Matriz/análise , Metaloproteinase 8 da Matriz/metabolismo , Biomarcadores/análise , Biomarcadores/metabolismo , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Peri-Implantite/diagnóstico , Peri-Implantite/metabolismo , Idoso , Implantes Dentários/efeitos adversos , Líquido do Sulco Gengival/química , Líquido do Sulco Gengival/metabolismo , Adulto , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática/métodos , Índice Periodontal , Curva ROC , Proteínas Sanguíneas , Peptídeos Catiônicos AntimicrobianosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The present study was based on the null hypothesis that there is no difference in clinicoradiographic parameters and whole salivary alpha amylase (AA) and mucin-4 levels before and after non-surgical mechanical debridement (NSMD) of patients with peri-implant mucositis (PM). The aim was to assess whole salivary AA and mucin-4 levels before and after treatment of PM. METHODS: Patients with PM (Group-1) and individuals without peri-implant diseases (Group-2) were included. Demographic data was collected and peri-implant modified plaque and bleeding indices (mPI and mBI, respectively), probing depth (PD) and crestal bone loss were measured at baseline. Levels of AA and mucin-4 were assessed in unstimulated whole saliva samples. All patients underwent full-mouth non-surgical periodontal therapy (NSPT) and NSMD; and clinical parameters and salivary biomarkers were re-assessed after 3 months. Level of significance was set at P < 0.01. RESULTS: Twenty-six and 32 individuals were included in groups 1 and 2, respectively. None of the participants had periodontitis. At baseline clinical periodontal parameters (PI [P < 0.001], GI [P < 0.001], clinical AL [P < 0.001] and PD [P < 0.001]) were significantly high in Group-1 than Group-2. At 3-month follow-up, there was a statistically significant reduction in clinical periodontal and peri-implant parameters (PI [P < 0.01], GI [P < 0.01], and PD [P < 0.01]) in Group-1 compared with their baseline values. At baseline, salivary AA levels were significantly high in Group-1 than Group-2 (P < 0.01). At 3-month follow-up, there was no significant difference in whole salivary AA levels among patients in groups 1 and 2. CONCLUSIONS: The AA and mucin-4 levels are potential biomarkers for evaluation of peri-implant diseases including PM. Mechanical instrumentation continues to be the most predictable treatment option for the management of peri-implant diseases.
Assuntos
Implantes Dentários , Mucina-4 , Peri-Implantite , Saliva , alfa-Amilases Salivares , Estomatite , Biomarcadores/análise , Desbridamento , Implantes Dentários/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Mucina-4/análise , Mucosite/etiologia , Mucosite/metabolismo , Mucosite/terapia , Peri-Implantite/etiologia , Peri-Implantite/metabolismo , Peri-Implantite/terapia , Saliva/química , alfa-Amilases Salivares/análise , Estomatite/etiologia , Estomatite/metabolismo , Estomatite/terapiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: It is hypothesized that levels of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-8 and MMP-9 are significantly higher in the peri-implant sulcular fluid (PISF) of waterpipe-smokers (WS) compared with never-smokers with peri-implantitis. The aim of the present convenience sample case-control study was to compare the levels of MMP-8 and MMP-9 in the PISF of WS and never-smokers with peri-implantitis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Individuals smoking waterpipe (Group 1) and never-smokers (Group 2) were included. Demographic data was collected using a questionnaire. Peri-implant probing depth (PPD) was measured and crestal bone loss (CBL) was measured on digital bitewing radiographs. PISF samples were collected using paper strips and the collected PISF volume was determined. Levels of MMP-8 and MMP-9 were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Study sample-size was estimated and statistical analysis was performed. p values < .05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Sixty-six individuals (33 individuals in Group 1 and 33 in Group 2) were included. In Groups 1 and 2, 41 and 44 implants, respectively were placed. The mean total PPD (p < .001) and peri-implant CBL (p < .001) was statistically significantly higher around implants affected by peri-implantitis in Group 1 compared with Group 2. The PISF volume (p < .05) collected and levels of MMP-8 (p < .01) and MMP-9 (p < .01) were statistically significantly higher among individuals in Group 1 compared with Group 2. CONCLUSION: PISF levels of MMP-8 and MMP-9 are significantly higher among WS compared with never-smokers with peri-implantitis.