Assessment of dermal safety of oil extracted from Periplaneta americana: acute dermal toxicity, irritation, and sensitization.

INTRODUCTION: The American cockroach (Periplaneta americana) is used in traditional Chinese medicine. Periplaneta americana (P. americana) is rich in oil that has shown potential antioxidant and antibacterial activities in vitro. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety of oil extracted from P. americana by conducting acute dermal toxicity, irritation, and sensitization tests. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In an acute dermal toxicity study, adult Sprague-Dawley rats were exposed to P. americana oil (2000 mg/kg body weight) for 24 h. Clinical observations were conducted to evaluate the toxicity, behaviour, and health of the animals every day after dermal exposure for 14 days. For the dermal irritation test, the oil was applied to rabbits in single and multiple doses. Multi-dose treatment was administered once per day for 14 days. Each rabbit served as its own left- and right-side control and the rabbits' irritation reactions in local intact and damaged skin were recorded and scored. The skin sensitization study of guinea pigs with the oil was conducted for a period of 28 days. RESULTS: The acute dermal median lethal dose (LD50) of P. americana oil was > 2000 mg/kg body weight in adult rats. There was no significant difference in mean irritation scores between the negative control and oil groups. The oil caused very little or no irritation in the intact and damaged skin rabbits treated with either single or multiple doses and it was non-sensitizing to the skin of guinea pigs. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that P. americana oil does not produce any significant acute toxic effects and is safe for use in animal models with almost no dermal irritation or sensitization. Therefore, it presents a low risk of provoking skin reactions in humans.

Assessment of Hymenoptera and Non-Hymenoptera Insect Bite and Sting Allergy Among Patients of Tropical Region of West Bengal, India.

West Bengal, India, is inhabited by abundance and variety of insects that triggers sensitization in some humans to inhalant allergens and/or insect stings/venoms. Lack of research on this topic prevented accurate diagnosis and proper follow-up treatments to patients suffering from insect-induced allergies. The aim of our study was to identify the allergy-causing insects and evaluate resulting sensitization among a study population in West Bengal, India. The skin prick test (SPT) evaluated sensitivity of 450 patients who sought treatment at the Allergy and Asthma Research Center from July 2017 to June 2018. Eight insect allergens were tested: Common Black Ant (Lasius niger, Linnaeus 1758), Fire Ant (Solenopsis invicta, Buren 1972), Honey Bee (Apis cerana indica, Fabricius 1798), Common Wasp (Vespula vulgaris, Linnaeus 1758), Mosquito (Aedes aegypti, Linnaeus in Hasselquist 1762), American Cockroach (Periplaneta americana, Linnaeus 1758), House Fly (Musca domestica, Linnaeus 1758), and Grasshopper (Gesonula punctifrons, Stal 1861). From a total of 450 patients evaluated, 370 patients had positive SPT reaction from at least one of the 8 insect allergens tested. Sensitivity to some Hymenoptera insects (common black ant, 87.62%; fire ant, 84.59%; and honey bee, 67.02%) was found in higher proportion than non-Hymenoptera group (mosquito, 66.67%; American cockroach, 33.33%; house fly, 10.41%; and grasshopper, 5.14%). There was significant difference in sensitivity among child, adolescent, and adult (P < 0.001). While female patients showed more sensitivity than males to SPT, the difference was statistically insignificant. In regards to occupation, farmers and bee keepers were most sensitive of field workers sensitive to Hymenoptera-derived allergens.

Convenient, rapid and economic detection and semi-quantification of American cockroach allergen in the environment.

BACKGROUND: Measuring allergen levels in the environment provides useful information to guide the management of allergic patients. A laboratory-based test kit sandwich ELISA for quantification of Per a 9, the major allergen of Periplaneta americana was recently developed. However, it is not suitable for screening. OBJECTIVE: To develop a simple, rapid, and economic format for semi-quantification of Per a 9 assay using dot-blot ELISA technique. METHODS: The efficacy of direct dot-blot ELISA and sandwich dot-blot ELISA was evaluated. Direct dot-blot ELISA was selected for further modification into 6 protocols. The selected protocol of direct dot-blot was further compared with the laboratory-based test kit, sandwich ELISA. RESULTS: The lowest detection limits in protocols no. 1-6 were 3.9, 15.6, 15.6, 62.5, 125 and 62.5 microg/ml of native Per a 9 whereas time required for each protocol was 145, 45, 30, 26, 18 and 26 minutes, respectively. The sensitivity of direct dot-ELISA was 3.9 microg/ml of Per a 9. Protocol no. 3 was the most suitable assay because its detection limits were as low as 15.6 microg/ml of CR allergen and the total process took only 30 minutes. In comparison with the 2 days required for laboratory sandwich ELISA, the selected protocol provided a similar yield of allergen detection but it offers significant savings of time. Additionally, this method could be easily interpreted by various groups of people. CONCLUSION: This modified direct dot-blot ELISA is the first membrane ELISA which is a semiquantitative test appropriate for screening American cockroach allergen owing to its simplicity, speed and good yield.

Lessons for primary prevention of asthma: foreign-born children have less association of SES and pests with asthma diagnosis.

There are no proven interventions for primary prevention of asthma. As asthma prevalence varies globally, comparing asthma in native and foreign-born children might provide insights. We pooled data from five cross sectional asthma surveys (N = 962). Place of birth was associated with asthma (OR = 3.4, P < 0.001). In children not born in the US, lower socio-economic status had no significant effect on asthma (OR = 0.71, P = 0.53), while for children born in the US, the effect was significant (OR = 2.1, P = 0.001). The odds ratio for exposure to household pests was significant (OR = 1.6, P < 0.008) for children born in the US but was non-significant for children born outside the US (OR = 0.29, P = 0.11). Our findings are consistent with foreign-born children experiencing protective factors or US born children experiencing detrimental environmental exposures.