Assessment of Clinical Drug-Drug Interactions of Elagolix, a Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptor Antagonist.

Elagolix is an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor antagonist indicated for the management of endometriosis-associated pain and in combination with estradiol/norethindrone acetate indicated for the management of heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine leiomyomas (fibroids) in premenopausal women. Elagolix coadministered with estradiol/norethindrone acetate is in late-stage development for the management of heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine fibroids. Based on the in vitro profile of elagolix metabolism and disposition, 9 drug-drug interaction (DDI) studies evaluating the victim and perpetrator characteristics of elagolix were conducted in 144 healthy volunteers. As a victim of cytochrome P450 (CYPs) and transporter-mediated DDIs, elagolix area under the curve (AUC) increased by ∼2-fold following coadministration with ketoconazole and by ∼5- and ∼2-fold with single and multiple doses of rifampin, respectively. As a perpetrator, elagolix decreased midazolam AUC (90% confidence interval) by 54% (50%-59%) and increased digoxin AUC by 32% (23%-41%). Elagolix decreased rosuvastatin AUC by 40% (29%-50%). No clinically significant changes in exposure on coadministration with sertraline or fluconazole occurred. A elagolix 150-mg once-daily regimen should be limited to 6 months with strong CYP3A inhibitors and rifampin because of the potential increase in bone mineral density loss, as described in the drug label. A 200-mg twice-daily regimen is recommended for no more than 1 month with strong CYP3A inhibitors and not recommended with rifampin. Elagolix is contraindicated with strong organic anion transporter polypeptide B1 inhibitors (eg, cyclosporine and gemfibrozil). Consider increasing the doses of midazolam and rosuvastatin when coadministered with elagolix, and individualize therapy based on patient response. Clinical monitoring is recommended for P-glycoprotein substrates with a narrow therapeutic window (eg, digoxin). Dose adjustments are not required for sertraline, fluconazole, bupropion (or any CYP2B6 substrate), or elagolix when coadministered.

An Assessment of Pharmacokinetic Interaction Between Lobeglitazone and Sitagliptin After Multiple Oral Administrations in Healthy Men.

PURPOSE: Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus require strict blood glucose control, and combination therapy with a thiazolidinedione and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, such as lobeglitazone and sitagliptin, is one of the recommended treatments. The objective of this study was to investigate a possible pharmacokinetic interaction between lobeglitazone and sitagliptin after multiple oral administrations in healthy Korean men. METHODS: Two randomized, open-label, multiple-dose, 2-way crossover studies were conducted simultaneously in healthy men. In study 1, men were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 sequences, and 1 of the following treatments was administered in each period: 1 tablet of lobeglitazone sulfate (0.5 mg) once daily for 5 days and or 1 tablet each of lobeglitazone sulfate (0.5 mg) and sitagliptin (100 mg) once daily for 5 days. In study 2, men were also randomly assigned to 1 of 2 sequences and the treatments were as follows: 1 tablet of sitagliptin (100 mg) once daily for 5 days or 1 tablet each of sitagliptin (100 mg) and lobeglitazone sulfate (0.5 mg) once daily for 5 days. Serial blood samples were collected up to 48 h after dosing on the fifth day. Plasma drug concentrations were measured by LC-MS/MS. Pharmacokinetic parameters, including Cmax,ss and AUC0-τ , were determined by noncompartmental analysis. The geometric least-square mean (GLSM) ratios and associated 90% CIs of log-transformed Cmax,ss and AUC0-τ for separate or coadministration were calculated to evaluate pharmacokinetic interactions. FINDINGS: Nineteen men from study 1 and 17 from study 2 completed the pharmacokinetic sampling and were included in the analyses. The GLSM ratios of Cmax,ss and AUC0-τ were 0.9494 (95% CI, 0.8798-1.0243) and 1.0106 (95% CI, 0.9119-1.1198) for lobeglitazone (from study 1) and 1.1694 (95% CI, 1.0740-1.2732) and 1.0037 (95% CI, 0.9715-1.0369) for sitagliptin (from study 2), respectively. IMPLICATIONS: Except for the slight 17% increase in the sitagliptin Cmax,ss value, the pharmacokinetic parameters of lobeglitazone and sitagliptin met the pharmacokinetic equivalent criteria when administered separately or in combination. The increase in Cmax of sitagliptin when coadministered with lobeglitazone would not be clinically significant in practice. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02824874 and NCT02827890.

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Analyses To Determine the Optimal Fixed Dosing Regimen of Iclaprim for Treatment of Patients with Serious Infections Caused by Gram-Positive Pathogens.

Iclaprim is a bacterial dihydrofolate reductase inhibitor that is currently being evaluated in two phase 3 trials for the treatment of patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI). Prior animal infection model studies suggest that the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) drivers for efficacy are area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h at steady state (AUC0-24ss), AUC/MIC, and time above the MIC during the dosing interval (T > MIC), while QTc prolongation was associated with the maximal concentration at steady state (Cmaxss) in a thorough QTc phase 1 study. Using PK data collected from 470 patients from the previously conducted phase 3 complicated skin and skin structure infection (cSSSI) trials, population PK modeling and Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) were used to identify a fixed iclaprim dosage regimen for the ongoing phase 3 ABSSSI studies that maximizes AUC0-24ss, AUC/MIC, and T > MIC while minimizing the probability of a Cmaxss of ≥800 ng/ml relative to the values for the previously employed cSSSI regimen of 0.8 mg/kg of body weight infused intravenously over 0.5 h every 12 h. The MCS analyses indicated that administration of 80 mg as a 2-h infusion every 12 h provides 28%, 28%, and 32% increases in AUC0-24ss, AUC/MIC, and T > MIC, respectively, compared to values for the 0.8-mg/kg cSSSI regimen, while decreasing the probability of a Cmaxss of ≥800 ng/ml, by 9%. Based on PK/PD analyses, 80 mg iclaprim administered over 2 h every 12 h was selected as the dosing scheme for subsequent phase 3 clinical trials.

Bioanalysis of ibrutinib and its active metabolite in human plasma: selectivity issue, impact assessment and resolution.

Ronald de Vries graduated in Organic and Analytical Chemistry at the Free University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands. After working in a Contract Laboratory (CRO) for 7 years, he joined Janssen R&D in 1998. At Janssen R&D, Belgium, Ronald worked in the bioanalytical department that supports both clinical and nonclinical bioanalysis. In this department he had several roles, such as providing the bioanalytical support for various drug development programs and leading the method establishment group. He has done numerous global assay transfers to/from Janssen from/to other laboratories and plays an important role in the introduction and application of new technologies and applied innovation in the department. In 2014 he started in the drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics department of Janssen R&D, where his main tasks are in vivo and in vitro metabolite identification using high resolution MS and Radiodetection.

A fixed-dose combination tablet of gemigliptin and metformin sustained release has comparable pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic, and tolerability profiles to separate tablets in healthy subjects.

BACKGROUND: In type 2 diabetes mellitus, fixed-dose combination (FDC) can provide the complementary benefits of correction of multiple pathophysiologic defects such as dysfunctions in glycemic or metabolic control while improving compliance compared with separate tablets taken together. The objective of the study reported here was to compare the pharmacodynamic (PD), pharmacokinetic (PK), and tolerability profiles of gemigliptin and extended-release metformin (metformin XR) between FDC and separate tablets. METHODS: A randomized, open-label, single-dose, two-way, two-period, crossover study was conducted in 28 healthy male volunteers. Two FDC tablets of gemigliptin/metformin 25/500 mg or separate tablets of gemigliptin (50 mg ×1) and metformin XR (500 mg ×2) were orally administered in each period. Serial blood samples were collected up to 48 hours post-dose to determine dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) activity using spectrophotometric assay and concentrations of gemigliptin and metformin using tandem mass spectrometry. Geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of FDC to separate tablet formulations and their 90% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to compare the PD and PK parameters between the two formulations. Tolerability was assessed throughout the study. RESULTS: The plasma DPP-4 activity-time curves of the FDC and the separate tablets almost overlapped, leading to a GMR (90% CI) of the FDC to separate tablets for the plasma DPP-4 activity and its maximum inhibition of 1.00 (0.97-1.04) and 0.92 (0.82-1.05), respectively. Likewise, all of the GMRs (90% CIs) of FDC to separate tablets for the area under the plasma concentration-time curve and maximum plasma concentration of gemigliptin and metformin fell entirely within the conventional bioequivalence range of 0.80-1.25. Both the FDC and separate tablets were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: The PD, PK, and tolerability profiles of gemigliptin and metformin XR in FDC and separate tablets were found to be comparable. The FDC tablet of gemigliptin and metformin sustained release can be a convenient therapeutic option in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus requiring a combination approach.

Metabolites in safety testing assessment in early clinical development: a case study with a glucokinase activator.

The present article summarizes Metabolites in Safety Testing (MIST) studies on a glucokinase activator, N,N-dimethyl-5-((2-methyl-6-((5-methylpyrazin-2-yl)carbamoyl)benzofuran-4-yl)oxy)pyrimidine-2-carboxamide (PF-04937319), which is under development for the treatment of type 2 diametes mellitus. Metabolic profiling in rat, dog, and human hepatocytes revealed that PF-04937319 is metabolized via oxidative (major) and hydrolytic pathways (minor). N-Demethylation to metabolite M1 [N-methyl-5-((2-methyl-6-((5-methylpyrazin-2-yl)carbamoyl)benzofuran-4-yl)oxy)pyrimidine-2-carboxamide] was the major metabolic fate of PF-04937319 in human (but not rat or dog) hepatocytes, and was catalyzed by CYP3A and CYP2C isoforms. Qualitative examination of circulating metabolites in humans at the 100- and 300-mg doses from a 14-day multiple dose study revealed unchanged parent drug and M1 as principal components. Because M1 accounted for 65% of the drug-related material at steady state, an authentic standard was synthesized and used for comparison of steady-state exposures in humans and the 3-month safety studies in rats and dogs at the no-observed-adverse-effect level. Although circulating levels of M1 were very low in beagle dogs and female rats, adequate coverage was obtained in terms of total maximal plasma concentration (∼7.7× and 1.8×) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC; 3.6× and 0.8× AUC) relative to the 100- and 300-mg doses, respectively, in male rats. Examination of primary pharmacology revealed M1 was less potent as a glucokinase activator than the parent drug (compound PF-04937319: EC50 = 0.17 µM; M1: EC50 = 4.69 µM). Furthermore, M1 did not inhibit major human P450 enzymes (IC50 > 30 µM), and was negative in the Salmonella Ames assay, with minimal off-target pharmacology, based on CEREP broad ligand profiling. Insights gained from this analysis should lead to a more efficient and focused development plan for fulfilling MIST requirements with PF-04937319.

Development and validation of a liquid chromatography/ mass spectrometry method for the simultaneous quantitation of rosuvastatin and ezetimibe in human plasma.

A simple, rapid, and sensitive LC/electrospray ionization (ESI)-MS method was developed and validated for the simultaneous determination of rosuvastatin (ROS) and ezetimibe (EZE) in human plasma. Following liquid-liquid extraction, the analytes and an internal standard, atorvastatin (ATO), were separated using an isocratic mobile phase comprising 0.1% (v/v) formic acid-methanol (20 + 80, v/v) on an RP-C18 column. Detection was performed on a mass spectrometer by selected ion monitoring using their respective [M-H]- ions, m/z 480 for ROS, m/z 408 for EZE, and m/z 557 for ATO. For both analytes, the method was linear in the range of 0.1 to 10 nglmL. Acceptable precision and accuracy were obtained for concentrations over the standard curve range. A run time of 4 min made it possible to determine many plasma samples/day. The validated LC/ESI-MS method can be used to study pharmacokinetics, bioavailability, and bioequivalence of combined dosage forms of ROS and EZE.

A neuropharmacokinetic assessment of bafetinib, a second generation dual BCR-Abl/Lyn tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas.

PURPOSE: The primary objective of this study was to use intracerebral microdialysis (ICMD) to determine the neuropharmacokinetics of bafetinib, a dual BCR-Abl/Lyn tyrosine kinase inhibitor that may have activity against gliomas. METHODS: A microdialysis catheter was placed into either peritumoural or enhancing brain tissue of seven patients at the time of tumour resection or biopsy. Twenty-four hours later, bafetinib was administered, 240 or 360 mg po, repeating the same dose 12 h later. Dialysate samples were continuously collected for 24h, with plasma samples obtained in parallel. One to two weeks after finishing ICMD, patients were allowed to resume taking bafetinib continuously while being observed for toxicity and tumour response. RESULTS: Twenty-six dialysate samples per patient were collected (n=6) and analysed for bafetinib by tandem mass spectrometry. Bafetinib concentrations in the brain were below the lower limit of detection of the assay (0.1 ng/ml) in all samples except one from a single subject that was 0.52 ng/ml. The mean plasma bafetinib maximum concentrations after dose 1 and 2 were 143±99 and 247±73 ng/ml, respectively. Only one patient remained on treatment past two cycles, and no radiographic responses were seen. CONCLUSIONS: Bafetinib does not sufficiently cross intact or disrupted blood-brain barrier, and therefore, systemic administration of bafetinib is not recommended when investigating this drug as a treatment for brain tumours. ICMD can be a valuable research tool in early drug development. Lead-in ICMD studies can be performed relatively quickly, requiring only a small number of patients, and without significantly disrupting standard cancer care.

Evaluation of dried blood spot (DBS) technology versus plasma analysis for the determination of MK-1775 by HILIC-MS/MS in support of clinical studies.

The collection of human blood samples as dried blood spots (DBS) for the pharmacokinetic assessment of investigational drugs in clinical trials offers a number of advantages over conventional plasma sampling, namely, small sample volume, simplified sample handling, and cost-effective shipping and storage. The use of DBS coupled with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis was evaluated for the quantification of MK-1775, a Wee-1 inhibitor under development as a chemo/radio-sensitizer for the treatment of cancer. The DBS method exhibited an assay performance comparable to that of the existing plasma assay, which is currently used in support of clinical studies. Both assays used the same linear dynamic range of 2-1,000 ng/mL, with a lower limit of quantification of 2 ng/mL. Based on the intra-day assay validation results, the accuracy of the DBS method ranged from 94.0 to 105.0%, with a coefficient of variation of <4.8%. The blood-to-plasma ratio calculated from the DBS data (blood concentrations) and the plasma data (plasma concentrations) was in good agreement with the one obtained from the in vitro assessment using conventional methodology. No significant hematocrit impact on the assay was observed as hematocrit ranged from 16 to 85%. The correlation between the measured MK-1775 concentrations in plasma and that determined in dried blood spots from oncology patients during the ongoing clinical study was discussed.

Preclinical assessment of the absorption and disposition of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor GDC-0980 and prediction of its pharmacokinetics and efficacy in human.

(S)-1-{4-[2-(2-Amino-pyrimidin-5-yl)-7-methyl-4-morpholin-4-yl-thieno[3,2-d]pyrimidin-6-ylmethyl]-piperazin-1-yl}-2-hydroxy-propan-1-one (GDC-0980) is a potent and selective inhibitor of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) and mammalian target of rapamycin, two key components of the PI3K pathway, the deregulation of which is associated with the development of many cancers. The objectives of these studies were to characterize the absorption and disposition of GDC-0980 and assess its efficacy in an MCF7-neo/HER2 human breast cancer xenograft model in immunocompromised mice. Studies in parental Madin-Darby canine kidney cells indicated that GDC-0980 had high permeability (P(app) = 18 × 10⁻6 cm/s), suggesting good absorption potential. However, it was found to be a P-glycoprotein and breast cancer resistance protein substrate in transfected cells and in knockout mice studies. Plasma protein binding was low, with the fraction unbound ranging from 29 to 52% across species. GDC-0980 hepatic clearance (CL) was predicted to be low in all of the species tested from hepatocyte incubations. The plasma CL of GDC-0980 was low in mouse (6.30 ml · min⁻¹ · kg⁻¹), rat (15.4 ml · min⁻¹ · kg⁻¹), and dog (6.37 ml · min⁻¹ · kg⁻¹) and moderate in cynomolgus monkey (18.9 ml · min⁻¹ · kg⁻¹). Oral bioavailability ranged from 14.4% in monkey to 125% in dog. Predicted human plasma CL and volume of distribution using allometry were 5.1 ml · min⁻¹ · kg⁻¹ and 1.8 l/kg, respectively. Parameters estimated from the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling of the MCF7-neo/HER2 xenograft data indicated that the GDC-0980 plasma concentration required for tumor stasis was approximately 0.5 µM. These parameters, combined with the predicted human pharmacokinetic profile, suggested that 55 mg once daily may be a clinically efficacious dose. GDC-0980 preclinical characterization and the predictions of its human properties supported its clinical development; it is currently in Phase II clinical trials.

Assessment of the pharmacokinetics of co-administered metformin and lobeglitazone, a thiazolidinedione antihyperglycemic agent, in healthy subjects.

OBJECTIVE: Lobeglitazone as a thiazolidinedione antihyperglycemic agent activates peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) γ and may be suitable as monotherapy or in combination with other antihyperglycemic agents. The primary objective of this study was to investigate potential pharmacokinetic interactions between lobeglitazone and metformin in healthy Korean subjects. METHODS: A randomized, open-label, multiple-dose, three-treatment, three-period, three-sequence, crossover study was conducted in 24 healthy Korean male volunteers. Serial blood samples were collected after lobeglitazone (0.5 mg/day) and metformin (1000 mg/day) were administered alone or concomitantly for 5 days in each period, and drug concentrations were determined by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. CLINICAL TRAIL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01005160. RESULTS: The steady-state maximum plasma concentrations (C(max, ss); mean ± standard deviation) of lobeglitazone and metformin alone were 29.38 ± 5.25 ng/mL and 1661.84 ± 471.88 ng/mL, respectively; the C(max, ss) during co-administration were 27.15 ± 5.75 ng/mL and 1779.92 ± 405.20 ng/mL, respectively. The steady-state areas under the concentration-time curves during the dose interval (AUC(τ, ss); mean ± standard deviation) of sole administration of lobeglitazone and metformin were 277.53 ± 65.25 ng*h/mL and 9650.27 ± 2089.81 ng*h/mL, respectively. When lobeglitazone and metformin were administered concomitantly, the AUC(τ, ss) were 257.29 ± 60.61 ng*h/mL and 10600.58 ± 1960.40 ng*h/mL, respectively. The geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval) of co-medication to lobeglitazone alone were 0.92 (0.87-0.97; C(max, ss)) and 0.93 (0.87-0.99; AUC(τ, ss)), and those for co-medication to metformin monotherapy were 1.09 (0.99-1.19; C(max, ss)) and 1.11 (1.04-1.19; AUC(τ, ss)). Both monotherapies and combination therapy were well tolerated; 52 self-resolving, non-serious adverse events were reported from 17 subjects. CONCLUSION: Lobeglitazone did not significantly affect the pharmacokinetics of metformin or vice versa when both drugs were co-administered. Lobeglitazone can be co-administered with metformin without dose adjustment for either agent. Therefore further patient studies are needed to corroborate these results.

Long-term outcome following imatinib therapy for chronic myelogenous leukemia, with assessment of dosage and blood levels: the JALSG CML202 study.

A prospective multicenter Phase II study was performed to examine the efficacy and safety of imatinib therapy in newly diagnosed Japanese patients with chronic-phase CML. Patients were scheduled to receive imatinib 400 mg daily. Plasma imatinib concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. In 481 evaluable patients, estimated 7-year overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) at a median follow-up of 65 months were 93% and 87%, respectively. Because imatinib dosage was reduced in many patients due mainly to adverse events, subgroup analysis was performed according to the mean daily dose during the first 24 months of treatment: ≥360 mg (400-mg group; n = 294), 270-359 mg (300-mg group; n = 90) and <270 mg (200-mg group; n = 67). There were no significant differences in OS and EFS between the 300- and 400-mg groups; however, cumulative rates of complete cytogenetic and major molecular responses differed significantly between the two groups. There were no significant differences in mean imatinib trough levels between these two groups for the patients in whom trough levels had been measured. Survival and efficacy in the 200-mg group were markedly inferior to the former two groups. These results suggest that, although a daily dose of 400 mg imatinib is associated with better outcomes, 300 mg imatinib may be adequate for a considerable number of Japanese patients who are intolerant to 400 mg imatinib. Blood level monitoring would be useful to determine the optimal dose of imatinib.

Assessment of the drug-drug interactions between fimasartan and hydrochlorothiazide in healthy volunteers.

AIM: Fimasartan is a selective angiotensin II receptor blocker. Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ), which is used to treat hypertension and edematous conditions, is coadministered with many antihypertensive agents. METHODS: An open-label, randomized, multiple-dosing, 2-arm, 1-sequence, 2-period study was conducted to assess the effects of fimasartan (240 mg) on HCTZ (25 mg) or vice versa in 18 and 14 healthy male volunteers, respectively. During each drug administration period, drugs were given once daily for 7 days, with a 7-day washout period between the 2 administration periods. RESULTS: The respective geometric mean ratios of fimasartan for AUC τ,ss and C max,ss with HCTZ were 1.30 [90% confidence interval (CI), 0.84-2.01] and 1.17 (90% CI, 0.93-1.47) compared with fimasartan alone. The respective geometric mean ratios of HCTZ for AUC τ,ss and C max,ss with fimasartan were 0.94 (90% CI, 0.84-1.04) and 0.88 (90% CI, 0.80-0.97) compared with HCTZ alone. Plasma renin activity indicated no significant differences between fimasartan monotherapy and coadministered treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Fimasartan administered alone or in combination with HCTZ was well tolerated at the described dosages. Coadministration of fimasartan increased the urinary excretion of HCTZ and urine volume, but these observations are unlikely to have any clinical relevance.

A simple assay for the simultaneous determination of rosuvastatin acid, rosuvastatin-5S-lactone, and N-desmethyl rosuvastatin in human plasma using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS).

A simple and sensitive assay was developed and validated for the simultaneous quantification of rosuvastatin acid (RST), rosuvastatin-5S-lactone (RST-LAC), and N-desmethyl rosuvastatin (DM-RST), in buffered human plasma using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). All the three analytes and the corresponding deuterium-labeled (d6) internal standards were extracted from 50 µL of buffered human plasma by protein precipitation. The analytes were chromatographically separated using a Zorbax-SB Phenyl column (2.1 mm × 100 mm, 3.5 µm). The mobile phase comprised of a gradient mixture of 0.1% v/v glacial acetic acid in 10% v/v methanol in water (solvent A) and 40% v/v methanol in acetonitrile (solvent B). The analytes were separated at baseline within 6.0 min using a flow rate of 0.35 mL/min. Mass spectrometry detection was carried out in positive electrospray ionization mode. The calibration curves for all three analytes were linear (R ≥ 0.9964, n = 3) over the concentration range of 0.1-100 ng/mL for RST and RST-LAC, and 0.5-100 ng/mL for DM-RST. Mean extraction recoveries ranged within 88.0-106%. Intra- and inter-run mean percent accuracy were within 91.8-111% and percent imprecision was ≤15%. Stability studies revealed that all the analytes were stable in matrix during bench-top (6 h on ice-water slurry), at the end of three successive freeze and thaw cycles and at -80°C for 1 month. The method was successfully applied in a clinical study to determine the concentrations of RST and the lactone metabolite over 12-h post-dose in patients who received a single dose of rosuvastatin.

Observational study of the clinical efficacy of voriconazole and its relationship to plasma concentrations in patients.

Voriconazole is approved for treating invasive fungal infections. We examined voriconazole exposure-response relationships for patients from nine published clinical trials. The relationship between the mean voriconazole plasma concentration (C(avg)) and clinical response and between the free C(avg)/MIC ratio versus the clinical response were explored using logistic regression. The impact of covariates on response was also assessed. Monte Carlo simulation was used to estimate the relationship between the trough concentration/MIC ratio and the probability of response. The covariates individually related to response were as follows: study (P < 0.001), therapy (primary/salvage, P < 0.001), primary diagnosis (P < 0.001), race (P = 0.004), baseline bilirubin (P < 0.001), baseline alkaline phosphatase (P = 0.014), and pathogen (yeast/mold, P < 0.001). The C(avg) for 72% of the patients was 0.5 to 5.0 µg/ml, with the maximum response rate (74%) at 3.0 to 4.0 µg/ml. The C(avg) showed a nonlinear relationship to response (P < 0.003), with a lower probability at the extremes. For patients with C(avg) < 0.5 µg/ml, the response rate was 57%. The lowest response rate (56%) was seen with a C(avg) ≥ 5.0 µg/ml (18% of patients) and was associated with significantly lower mold infection responses compared to yeasts (P < 0.001) but not with voriconazole toxicity. Higher free C(avg)/MIC ratios were associated with a progressively higher probability of response. Monte Carlo simulation suggested that a trough/MIC ratio of 2 to 5 is associated with a near-maximal probability of response. The probability of response is lower at the extremes of C(avg). Patients with higher free C(avg)/MIC ratios have a higher probability of clinical response. A trough/MIC ratio of 2 to 5 can be used as a target for therapeutic drug monitoring.

Determination of tandospirone in human plasma by a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method.

A rapid, sensitive, and selective liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for the detection of tandospirone in human plasma is described. It was employed in a pharmacokinetic study. The analyte and internal standard diphenhydramine were extracted from plasma using liquid-liquid extraction, then separated on a Zorbax XDB C(18) column using a mobile phase of methanol-water-formic acid (80:20:0.5, v/v/v). The detection was performed with a tandem mass spectrometer equipped with an electrospray ionization source. Linearity was established in the concentration range of 10.0-5,000 pg/ml. The lower limit of quantification was 10.0 pg/ml. The intraday and interday relative standard deviation across three validation runs over the entire concentration range was less than 13%. Accuracy determined at three concentrations (25.0, 200, and 4,000 pg/ml for tandospirone) ranged from 94.4 to 102.1%. Each plasma sample was chromatographed within 3.4 min. The method proved to be highly selective and suitable for bioequivalence evaluation of different formulations containing tandospirone and clinical pharmacokinetic investigation of tandospirone.

Relative bioavailability and pharmacokinetic comparison of two 2-mg risperidone tablet formulations: A single dose, randomized-sequence, double-blind, 2-way crossover study in healthy male volunteers in Thailand.

BACKGROUND: Data regarding the pharmacokinetic properties of risperidone in the Thai population are limited. A new generic tablet formulation was recently developed, but bioequivalence research is necessary to obtain marketing authorization for it in Thailand. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the pharmacokinetic properties of risperidone and its active metabolite, 9-hydroxyrisperidone (which reportedly contributes to the drug's pharmacodynamic effects), in a newly developed generic tablet formulation (test) and a branded formulation (reference) in healthy, fasting, male Thai volunteers. METHODS: A single-dose, randomized-sequence, double-blind, 2-way crossover design was used in this study. The study took place from October 21 through November 28, 2007. After a ≥10-hour overnight fast, volunteers were orally administered one 2-mg risperidone tablet, either the test formulation (Condrug International Company, Ltd.) or the reference formulation-according to the randomization schedule-followed by a 14-day washout period and administration of the alternate formulation. Blood samples were collected over a period of 96 hours. Risperidone and 9-hydroxyrisperidone plasma concentrations were simultaneously determined using a validated HPLC/ion trap mass spectrometry method. The plasma concentration-time curves of the active moiety, risperidone, and 9-hydroxyrisperidone were generated for each volunteer, from which the C(max), T(max), AUC0₋(last), AUC0₋(∞), and t(½) were determined using noncompartmental analysis. The effects of formulation, period, sequence, and subject (within sequence) on pharmacokinetic parameters were analyzed using ANOVA. According to regulatory requirements set forth by Thailand, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, and the US Food and Drug Administration, products meet the criteria for bioequivalence if the 90% CIs of the treatment ratios for C(max) and AUC are within the range of 0.80 to 1.25. Tolerability was assessed by patient interview, monitoring vital signs (ie, resting blood pressure, heart rate, body temperature), physical examination, and laboratory tests (ie, urinalysis, hematology, blood chemistry) before and after the study. RESULTS: A total of 22 Thai male volunteers (mean [SD] age, 28.18 [8.27] years [range, 20.62-44.19 years]; weight, 62.43 [4.76] kg [range, 55.03-76.02 kg]; and body mass index, 21.76 [2.07] kg/m² [range, 18.9924.91 kg/m²]) completed the study. The mean (SD) relative bioavailabilities of test to reference formulations determined from AUC of the active moiety, risperidone, and 9-hydroxyrisperidone were 1.06 (0.18), 1.07 (0.29), and 1.04 (0.17), respectively. The ANOVA suggested no statistically significant effect of formulation, period, or sequence on the studied pharmacokinetic parameters of the active moiety, risperidone, or 9-hydroxyrisperidone. The 90% CIs for the natural logarithm-transformed ratios of C(max), AUC0₋(last), and AUC0₋(∞) were as follows: for active moiety, 0.94 to 1.03, 0.98 to 1.11, and 0.98 to 1.10, respectively; for risperidone, 0.90 to 1.10, 0.96 to 1.13, and 0.96 to 1.14, respectively; and for 9-hydroxyrisperidone, 0.91 to 1.03, 0.97 to 1.10, and 0.96 to 1.09, respectively. All met the criteria for bioequivalence. The most commonly reported adverse events (AEs) were somnolence (100.0%), orthostatic hypotension (13.6%), headache (4.5%), and syncope (2.3%). AEs were mild and disappeared within 1 day. No volunteers withdrew from the study because of AEs. CONCLUSIONS: The single-dose pharmacokinetic data in this small, all-male, selected sample of fasting, healthy volunteers met Thailand's regulatory criteria for assuming bioequivalence of the tested generic and reference 2-mg risperidone tablets. Both formulations were well tolerated.

Imatinib assay by HPLC with photodiode-array UV detection in plasma from patients with chronic myeloid leukemia: Comparison with LC-MS/MS.

BACKGROUND: Imatinib, a competitive inhibitor of BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase, is now the first-line treatment for chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). Therapeutic drug monitoring targeting trough plasma levels of about 1000ng/mL may help to optimize the therapeutic effect. METHODS: We developed a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method with UV/Diode Array Detection (DAD) for trough imatinib concentration determination in human plasma. Imatinib trough levels were measured in plasma from 65 CML patients using our method and LC-MS/MS as the reference method. Results with these two methods were compared using Deming regression, chi-square test, and sign test. RESULTS: The calibration curve was prepared in blank human plasma. HPLC-UV/DAD calibration curves were linear from 80 to 4000ng/mL, and the limit of quantification was set at 80ng/mL. The between-day variation was 6.1% with greater than 96% recovery after direct plasma deproteinization and greater than 98% recovery from the column. No significant differences in imatinib plasma levels were found between HPLC-UV/DAD and LC-MS/MS. CONCLUSIONS: This HPLC-UV/DAD method was sufficiently specific and sensitive for imatinib TDM, with no evidence of interference. Our rapid inexpensive HPLC-UV/DAD method that requires only widely available equipment performs well for plasma imatinib assays.

New strategies in controlling drug resistance.

BACKGROUND: Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is most often caused by the translocation of chromosomes 9 and 22 to create the fusion protein, BCR-ABL. This constitutively active tyrosine kinase promotes cell division and blocks apoptosis, leading to unregulated growth of hematopoietic stem cells. Imatinib is a small molecule that binds to BCR-ABL at the site in which adenosine triphosphate (ATP) binds and blocks BCR-ABL function by blocking its ability to use ATP. As a front-line therapy, imatinib has been tremendously successful, with 80% to 90% of patients with chronic phase (CP) CML remaining progression free for more than 5 years. Increasingly, however, imatinib-resistant clones are appearing that allow the disease to progress. dealing with the rise of these resistant clones has presented an important challenge to health care providers. OBJECTIVE: To review the mechanisms by which CML becomes resistant to imatinib and to discuss the new therapeutic alternatives to imatinib and when they should be considered. SUMMARY: Managed care weighs advances and associated costs to determine the introduction of imatinib has indefinitely lengthened the survival time of patients with CML, transforming this into a chronic disease condition. However, care must be taken to avoid the appearance of imatinib- resistant clones. resistance can manifest through 1 of several mechanisms, including increased plasma protein binding, increased drug efflux, the appearance of BCR-ABL mutants that have low affinity for imatinib, the appearance of BCR-ABL independent proliferation signals, and the amplification of the BCR-ABL gene. Subtherapeutic dosing is highly likely to result in the selection of a resistant clone; thus, it is of paramount importance to ensure the imatinib dose is sufficient. Measurements of plasma levels of imatinib are proving to be predictive of outcomes, suggesting that the monitoring of imatinib levels will be an important and necessary aspect of monitoring disease. Several clinical trials have shown that high-dose imatinib provides greater and faster response rates. This also may lead to better long-term blockade of disease progression. waiting until disease progression begins appears to lead to greater resistance to high-dose imatinib and should be avoided. dasatinib is a next-generation kinase inhibitor that binds to both SrC and to multiple conformations of BCR-ABL. It is capable of blocking several BCR-ABL mutants that are resistant to imatinib. Clinical trials have shown dasatinib is effective in maintaining patients in CP and can return a percentage of patients with advanced CML to CP. economic analysis indicates that the cost-efficacy ratio for imatinib is approximately $40,000 per year and compares favorably with the costs of accepted procedures, such as dialysis. data have shown that tyrosine kinases also have better mortality rates than allogeneic bone marrow transplant for the first 8 years and appear to also be more cost-effective than transplantation for this time frame. CONCLUSION: New clinical data are beginning to supply us with effective dosing and monitoring parameters for imatinib and dasatinib treatment of CML. economic analysis indicates that these therapies are acceptable in cost and effective in providing good quality of life to patients.