Exploring azomethine ylides reactivity with acrolein through cycloaddition reaction and computational antiviral activity assessment against hepatitis C virus.

CONTEXT: The regioselectivity and diastereoselectivity of the 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reaction between azomethine ylides and acrolein were investigated. The DFT studies revealed that the favored pathway leads to the formation of cis-cycloadduct pyrrolidine and these computational findings align with experimental observations. The cis-cycloadduct pyrrolidine product serves as an advanced intermediate in the synthesis of a hepatitis C virus inhibitor. For this, the antiviral activity of cis-cycloadduct pyrrolidine against cyclophilin A, the co-factor responsible for hepatitis C virus, was also evaluated through molecular docking simulations which revealed intriguing interactions and a high C-score, which were further confirmed by molecular dynamics simulations, demonstrating stability over a 100-ns simulation period. Furthermore, the cis-cycloadduct pyrrolidine exhibits favorable drug-like properties and a better ADMET profile compared to hepatitis C virus inhibitor. METHODS: Chemical reactivity studies were performed using DFT method by the functional B3LYP at 6-31G (d, p) computational level by GAUSSIAN 16 program. Frontal molecular orbitals theory used to investigate HOMO/LUMO interactions between azomethine ylides and acrolein. Findings of this approach were confirmed by global reactivity indices and electron displacement was investigated based on Fukui functions. Furthermore, the activation energies were determined after frequency calculations using TS Berny algorithm and transition states were confirmed by the presence of a single imaginary frequency. Moreover, antiviral activity of cis-cycloadduct was explored through molecular docking using Surflex-Dock suite SYBYL X 2.0, and molecular dynamics simulation using GROMACS program. Finally, drug-like properties were investigated with SwissADME and ADMETlab 2.0.

Longitudinal Effects of Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor: Multidimensional Assessment of Neuropsychological Side Effects and Physical and Mental Health Outcomes in Adolescents and Adults.

BACKGROUND: Italy initiated elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) for people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) in July 2021. It has led to dramatic improvements in lung function, BMI, sweat chloride, and respiratory symptoms. However, few data are available on side effects or effects on a broad range of outcomes. RESEARCH QUESTION: How does ETI affect mental health, cognitive processing, neuropsychological side effects, GI symptoms, and health-related quality of life over time? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a prospective, "real-world" longitudinal study. Participants were recruited consecutively and evaluated at initiation (T0) and after 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months of starting treatment. Assessments included depression (nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire), anxiety (seven-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder), cognition (Symbol Digit Modalities Test), GI Symptom Tracker, and health-related quality of life (Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised). Based on literature, an ad hoc questionnaire was developed to assess side effects: insomnia, headache, memory problems, "brain fog," and concentration problems. Following descriptive analyses, longitudinal data were analyzed by using mixed models for repeated measures, controlling for age and sex when appropriate. RESULTS: Ninety-two consecutive pwCF (female/male, 46/46; mean age, 25.4 years) participated. FEV1 increased initially and then remained stable. BMI also increased significantly from T0 to 6 months (P < .01). Depression improved from T0 to 1 month (P < .001); however, no changes in anxiety were found. Cognitive processing improved from T0 to subsequent assessments. Positive changes were reported on the GI Symptom Tracker for stools and adherence challenges, although no changes were found for abdominal pain and digestion. Side effects occurred in 10% to 29%, with no reduction over time; insomnia increased significantly across time. Female participants reported more side effects than male participants (ie, insomnia, headache, concentration problems, brain fog). INTERPRETATION: This prospective study evaluated the effects of ETI using multiple measures. Significant improvements were found in many domains; however, side effects were reported by a substantial proportion of pwCF, with no improvements over time. Female participants reported more side effects than male participants. pwCF should be followed up systematically to assess the frequency of side effects after starting this new modulator.

Abuse potential assessment of the dual orexin receptor antagonist daridorexant in rats.

BACKGROUND: Drugs that act on the central nervous system (CNS) and have sedative effects can lead to abuse in humans. New CNS-active drugs often require evaluation of their abuse potential in dedicated animal models before marketing approval. Daridorexant is a new dual orexin receptor antagonist (DORA) with sleep-promoting properties in animals and humans. It was approved in 2022 in the United States and Europe for the treatment of insomnia disorder. AIMS: Nonclinical evaluation of abuse potential of daridorexant using three specific rat models assessing reinforcement, interoception, and withdrawal. METHODS: Reinforcing effects of daridorexant were assessed in an operant rat model of intravenous drug self-administration. Similarity of interoceptive effects to those of the commonly used sleep medication zolpidem was tested in an operant drug discrimination task. Withdrawal signs indicative of physical dependence were evaluated upon sudden termination of chronic daridorexant treatment. Rat experiments were conducted at a dose range resulting in daridorexant plasma concentrations equaling or exceeding those achieved at the clinically recommended dose of 50 mg in humans. RESULTS: Daridorexant had no reinforcing effects, was dissimilar to zolpidem in the drug discrimination task, and did not induce any withdrawal-related signs upon treatment discontinuation that would be indicative of physical dependence. OUTCOMES: Daridorexant showed no signs of abuse or dependence potential in rats. Our data indicate that daridorexant, like other DORAs, has a low potential for abuse in humans.

Industry Payments for Vibegron and Prescribing Patterns Among Urologic Clinicians.

This cross-sectional study compares the prescribing practices among urologists and advanced practice clinicians who received vs did not receive payment from drug manufacturers.

Cardiovascular Risk Assessment After Sofosbuvir And Daclatasvir Regimen For Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection.

Objectives: To assess cardiovascular risk after sofosbuvir and daclatasvir antiviral combination therapy in chronic hepatitis C virus patients. Method: The prospective cohortstudy was conducted at the Kafrelsheikh University Hospital, Egypt, from December 2019 to December 2021, and comprised adult patients of either gender with chronic hepatitis C virus and with minimum ejection fraction 40%. They were classified into groups according to their cardiovascular risk. Group 1 had individuals with no risk factors, Group 2 had patients with many risk factors, Group 3 had patients with only hypertension, Group 4 had those with diabetes alone, and Group 5 comprised smokers. All the patients were evaluated for the risk of major cardiovascular events at baseline and at the end of 12-week of antiviral combination therapy of sofosbuvir 400 mg once daily dose and daclatasvir 60 mg once daily dose. Data was analysed with SPSS version 23. RESULTS: Of the 200 patients, there were 96(48%) males and 104(52%) females. The age ranged 34-81 years. There were 78(39%) patients in Group 1; 20(25.6%) males and 58(74.4%) females with mean age 54.4±10.45 years. Group 2 had 60(30%) patients; 40(66.6%) males and 20(33.3%) females with mean age 59.57±9.1 years. Group 3 had 25(12.5%) patients; 3(12%) males and 22(88%) females with mean age 61.4±7.8 years. Group 4 had 13(6.5%) patients; 10(77%) males and 3(23%) females with mean age 55.4±10.4 years. Group 5 had 24(12%) patients who were all (100%) males with mean age 60.7±5.7 years. There were non-significant changes in the incidence of angina, arrhythmias or progression of dyspnoea (p>0.05). Echocardiography follow-up results showed non-significant changes in mean ejection fraction, global longitudinal strain and pulmonary artery pressure (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Sofosbuvir and daclatasvir combination therapy wasfound to be safe in chronic hepatitis C virus patients regarding cardiac risks.

A UK cost-effectiveness analysis of trifluridine/tipiracil for heavily pretreated metastatic gastroesophageal cancers.

Background: The current work was designed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of trifluridine/tipiracil (T/T) versus best supportive care (BSC) for patients with advanced stage or metastatic gastroesophageal cancer (mGC) from a UK perspective. Materials & methods: A partitioned survival analysis was undertaken using data from the phase III TAGS trial. A jointly fitted lognormal model was selected for overall survival and individual generalized gamma models were chosen for progression-free survival and time-to-treatment-discontinuation. The primary outcome was the cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Sensitivity analyses were undertaken to investigate uncertainty. Results: Compared with BSC, T/T was associated with a cost per QALY gained of £37,907. Conclusion: T/T provides a cost-effective treatment option for mGC in the UK setting.

Economical Access to Diverse Enantiopure Tetrahydropyridines and Piperidines Enabled by Catalytic Borrowing Hydrogen.

We disclose herein a catalytic borrowing hydrogen method that enables an unprecedented, economical one-pot access to enantiopure tetrahydropyridines with minimal reagent use or waste formation. This method couples a few classes of readily available substrates with commercially available 1,3-amino alcohols, and delivers the valuable tetrahydropyridines of different substitution patterns free of N-protection. Such transformations are highly challenging to achieve, as multiple redox steps need to be realized in a cascade and numerous side reactions including a facile aromatization have to be overcome. Highly diastereoselective functionalizations of tetrahydropyridines also result in a general access to enantiopure di- and tri-substituted piperidines, which ranks the topmost frequent N-heterocycle in commercial drugs.

Hydrogen Transfer Coupling with 100% Atom Economy: Synthesis of 2-Indolyltetrahydronaphthyridine Derivatives.

An iridium-catalyzed hydrogen transfer strategy, enabling straightforward access to tetrahydropyridine derivatives from aryl-1,8-naphthyridines and indolines was developed. This method has unprecedented advantages, including high step economy. In addition, it does not produce any byproducts or require an external high-pressure H2 gas source. The method offers an important platform for the transformation of 1,8-naphthyridines and indolines into functionalized products.

Cost-effectiveness of vibegron for the treatment of overactive bladder in the United States.

AIMS: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of vibegron compared with other oral pharmacologic therapies as treatment for overactive bladder (OAB). METHODS: A semi-Markov model with monthly cycles was developed to support a lifetime horizon of vibegron 75 mg from a US commercial payor or Medicare perspective. The model incorporated efficacy (reductions in daily micturitions and urinary incontinence episodes), adverse events, OAB-related comorbidities, drug-drug interactions, anticholinergic burden, and treatment persistence. Direct costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) were accumulated over time. The primary outcome was the cost per QALY incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). One-way (OWSA) and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were performed. RESULTS: For commercial payors, vibegron was cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $50,000/QALY versus mirabegron 50 mg (ICER, $9,311) and at a WTP threshold of $150,000/QALY versus mirabegron 25 mg (ICER, $141,957) and versus an anticholinergic basket based on market share (ICER, $118,121). For Medicare, vibegron was cost-effective at a WTP threshold of $50,000/QALY versus mirabegron 50 mg (ICER, $12,154) and at a WTP threshold of $100,000/QALY versus mirabegron 25 mg (ICER, $99,150) and versus an anticholinergic market basket (ICER, $60,756). For commercial payors and Medicare, OWSAs for vibegron versus mirabegron indicated cost-effectiveness was most sensitive to vibegron persistence at 1 and 12 months. PSAs indicated that vibegron was cost-effective versus mirabegron 50 mg 98.6% and 100% of the time at $50,000/QALY for commercial payors and Medicare payors, respectively. LIMITATIONS: Due to lack of real-world data available on persistence, vibegron was assumed to have the same persistence as mirabegron 50 mg. Long-term efficacy was assumed to be sustained beyond 52 weeks in the absence of clinical trials longer than 52 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Vibegron is cost-effective from a commercial payor (WTP threshold $150,000/QALY) and Medicare (WTP threshold $100,000/QALY) perspective when compared with other oral pharmacologic treatments for OAB.

Overactive bladder (OAB) affects more than 30 million adults in the United States. OAB is a condition associated with frequent and sudden urges to urinate. Drugs for treating OAB may improve symptoms for patients. Anticholinergic drugs are one type of drug available for treating OAB. Anticholinergic drugs may cause side effects such as dry mouth and constipation. Newer types of drugs called ß₃-adrenergic receptor agonists are available for treating OAB symptoms. Vibegron is a member of the ß₃-adrenergic receptor agonist class of drugs. Vibegron does not cause the same side effects related to anticholinergic drugs such as dry mouth and constipation. ß₃-adrenergic receptor agonists work well for OAB symptoms but may be more expensive than anticholinergic drugs. It is important to choose drugs that work well and that are a reasonable price. This study assessed if vibegron is cost-effective for people enrolled in US private insurance and Medicare plans. Compared with other common drugs such as anticholinergic drugs for OAB, vibegron is cost-effective for people enrolled in private insurance and Medicare plans. This was in part because vibegron works better for longer and causes fewer adverse effects than other drugs. Vibegron may be considered "good value for money" for patients with OAB.

Budget Impact Analysis of Vibegron for the Treatment of Overactive Bladder in the USA.

BACKGROUND: Overactive bladder (OAB) is associated with considerable clinical and economic burden. Treatment of patients with OAB using anticholinergics is limited by tolerability issues and increased anticholinergic burden, which is associated with increased risk of dementia and falls/fractures. This analysis assessed the budget impact of introducing the ß3-adrenergic agonist vibegron for the treatment of patients with OAB from US commercial payor and Medicare perspectives. METHODS: A budget impact model (BIM) with a 5-year time horizon was developed using a top-down, prevalence-based approach and projected market shares for 1-million-member US commercial and Medicare plans. The BIM included vibegron, mirabegron, and anticholinergics, incorporating changes in clinical outcomes (efficacy, drug-drug interactions, anticholinergic burden (ACB), OAB-related comorbidities, and adverse events (AEs)). Costs per member per month (PMPM) and per treated member per month (PTMPM) were determined. One-way sensitivity analyses quantified the impact of changes in key variables. RESULTS: The introduction of vibegron was associated with a modest increase in PMPM cost over 5 years of $0.12 (range for years 1‒5, $0.01‒$0.26) for commercial payors and $0.24 ($0.01‒$0.52) for Medicare (PTMPM cost: $2.70 ($0.17‒$4.85) and $3.15 ($0.19‒$5.82), respectively). Costs were partially offset by savings related to decreased third-line treatment use, yearly decreases in AE and comorbidity incidence, reduced drug-drug interactions, and reduced ACB associated with vibegron introduction. PMPM costs were most sensitive to vibegron market share assumptions, OAB prevalence, and vibegron persistence at 1 month for private payors and Medicare and additionally vibegron persistence at 12 months for Medicare. CONCLUSIONS: Vibegron may address unmet needs in treating OAB and is a useful addition to health plans while minimizing risks of anticholinergic AEs, ACB, and drug-drug interactions, which may partially offset increased pharmacy costs.

Adults with overactive bladder (OAB) experience frequent and sudden urges to urinate. OAB affects more than 100 million men and women in the USA. In 2020, the projected cost of OAB was $82.6 billion. One of the standard treatments for OAB includes a class of drugs called anticholinergics. Anticholinergic drugs can cause side effects such as dry mouth and constipation. Over time, taking a lot of anticholinergic drugs may lead to increased risk of cognitive impairment or dementia. Vibegron is from a different class of drug for the treatment of OAB known as ß₃-adrenergic receptor agonists. Adding a new drug to the market may have a financial impact on healthcare plans. This study assessed if adding vibegron for treating OAB is affordable in US commercial and Medicare plans. Adding vibegron to a health plan somewhat increased monthly costs over 5 years. For commercial insurance plans, monthly costs over 5 years increased $0.12 per person enrolled in the plan. For Medicare plans, monthly costs over 5 years increased $0.24 per person enrolled in the plan. However, adding vibegron to the market lowered overall costs not directly related to OAB by lowering healthcare costs related to taking a lot of anticholinergic drugs or costs of outpatient visits. Vibegron for treating OAB may be a helpful addition to health plans. Vibegron may reduce some healthcare costs for patients with OAB.

Analyzing the use and impact of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor on total cost of care and other health care resource utilization in a commercially insured population.

BACKGROUND: Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a rare, life-threatening disease that results in severe respiratory, digestive, and metabolic problems. Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor is an oral drug that was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on October 21, 2019, after demonstrating clinical improvements compared with previous CF transmembrane conductance regulator modulators. Use of CF transmembrane conductance regulator modulators has improved CF care, but their high costs exceed commonly used cost-effectiveness thresholds. The Institute for Clinical and Economic Review issued an access and affordability alert warning that these high costs could threaten sustainable access to high-value care. There exists little real-world evidence on the uptake of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor and the impact on total cost of care and other health care resource utilization. This exploratory study analyzed the uptake and total cost-of-care impact of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor using pharmacy and medical claims data in a commercially insured patient population. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the uptake of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor by members who qualified for treatment and to evaluate the differences in total cost of care and health care resource utilization in members who started treatment with elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor. METHODS: Uptake and per-member per-month information was obtained from Prime Therapeutics databases using cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator claims. The total cost-of-care and resource utilization analysis used pharmacy and medical claims from Prime Therapeutics and Blue Cross NC across approximately 1.34 million commercially insured members over 20 months. Members with CF were identified by 2 or more International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes (E84.xx) in any field at least 30 days apart or by a CFTR modulator claim. Only continuously enrolled members with CF with an elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor pharmacy claim were included. The date of the first claim served as the index date. RESULTS: At 12 months after FDA approval, 77 (68%) Blue Cross NC members with CF were using elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor. Of these, 33 had switched from a different CFTR modulator and 44 were naive to CFTR modulator therapy. Pharmacy and medical claims for 51 continuously enrolled members that initiated elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor were analyzed. The average total cost of care increased by 52% (P < 0.00001). Hospitalizations decreased from an average of 7.7 (± 7.2) to 3.9 (± 5.5) (P < 0.00001). The sum and average number of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections were numerically lower, but the results did not meet statistical significance. Use of other supportive medications was numerically lower, but no statistically significant differences were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The uptake of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor was rapid, and the total cost of care increased despite reductions in hospitalizations and nonpharmacy costs. Differences in use of other CF-related medications appeared to be minimally affected. DISCLOSURES: Dr Smith and Dr Borchardt have no financial conflicts of interest to report. Both authors are employed at BCBSNC at the time of writing. The project had no outside funding or sponsorship. The majority of the work and data analysis was completed as part of the requirements of the PGY1 Managed Care Pharmacy Residency program at BCBSNC during the 2020-2021 cycle year. This research does not meet the definition of human subject research as defined by the US Department of Health and Human Services at 45 C.F.R. § 46.102(f). According to definitions in section (e)(1), our research did not require either (i) information or biospecimens through intervention or interaction with any individuals or (ii) obtained, used, studied, analyzed, or generated private information or identifiable biospecimens. Therefore, institutional review board approval or a valid exemption is not required.

Assessment of the effect of the dual orexin receptor antagonist daridorexant on various indices of disease severity in patients with mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnea.

BACKGROUND: The dual orexin receptor antagonist daridorexant did not impact nighttime respiratory function as assessed by the apnea/hypopnea index (AHI) and nocturnal oxygen saturation (SpO2) and improved sleep in patients with mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). These analyses were supplemented with further evaluations of various indices of OSA severity and sleep variables. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-period, crossover study, 50 mg daridorexant or placebo was administered every evening for 5 days to 28 patients with mild to moderate OSA. Treatment differences (daridorexant - placebo) were explored for indices of OSA severity including the number and duration of apneas and hypopneas, mean and lowest nocturnal SpO2, sleep duration during each hour of polysomnography recording, and the number and mean and longest duration of awakenings. RESULTS: After repeated-dose daridorexant, more respiratory events were observed compared to placebo, ie., treatment difference of 16.4 events (90% confidence interval: -0.4, 33.2) which is explained by a longer total sleep time. However, no treatment difference was detected for the longest duration of apneas and hypopneas (1.5 s [-8.3, 11.2] and 8.2 s [-6.6, 23.0], respectively), and lowest SpO2 (0.9% [-0.3, 2.1]). The number of awakenings was similar between daridorexant and placebo while daridorexant shortened the longest duration by 16.2 min (8.5, 23.8). Overall, results were similar after single and repeated dosing for both respiratory and sleep aspects. CONCLUSION: These results suggest safe use of daridorexant in patients with mild to moderate OSA. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03765294. A study to investigate the effects of ACT-541468 on nighttime respiratory function in patients with mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnea. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03765294.

Pharmacodynamic evaluation and safety assessment of treatment with antibodies to serum amyloid P component in patients with cardiac amyloidosis: an open-label Phase 2 study and an adjunctive immuno-PET imaging study.

BACKGROUND: In a Phase I study treatment with the serum amyloid P component (SAP) depleter miridesap followed by monoclonal antibody to SAP (dezamizumab) showed removal of amyloid from liver, spleen and kidney in patients with systemic amyloidosis. We report results from a Phase 2 study and concurrent immuno-positron emission tomography (PET) study assessing efficacy, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, safety and cardiac uptake (of dezamizumab) following the same intervention in patients with cardiac amyloidosis. METHODS: Both were uncontrolled open-label studies. After SAP depletion with miridesap, patients received ≤ 6 monthly doses of dezamizumab in the Phase 2 trial (n = 7), ≤ 2 doses of non-radiolabelled dezamizumab plus [89Zr]Zr-dezamizumab (total mass dose of 80 mg at session 1 and 500 mg at session 2) in the immuno-PET study (n = 2). Primary endpoints of the Phase 2 study were changed from baseline to follow-up (at 8 weeks) in left ventricular mass (LVM) by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and safety. Primary endpoint of the immuno-PET study was [89Zr]Zr-dezamizumab cardiac uptake assessed via PET. RESULTS: Dezamizumab produced no appreciable or consistent reduction in LVM nor improvement in cardiac function in the Phase 2 study. In the immuno-PET study, measurable cardiac uptake of [89Zr]Zr-dezamizumab, although seen in both patients, was moderate to low. Uptake was notably lower in the patient with higher LVM. Treatment-associated rash with cutaneous small-vessel vasculitis was observed in both studies. Abdominal large-vessel vasculitis after initial dezamizumab dosing (300 mg) occurred in the first patient with immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis enrolled in the Phase 2 study. Symptom resolution was nearly complete within 24 h of intravenous methylprednisolone and dezamizumab discontinuation; abdominal computed tomography imaging showed vasculitis resolution by 8 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike previous observations of visceral amyloid reduction, there was no appreciable evidence of amyloid removal in patients with cardiac amyloidosis in this Phase 2 trial, potentially related to limited cardiac uptake of dezamizumab as demonstrated in the immuno-PET study. The benefit-risk assessment for dezamizumab in cardiac amyloidosis was considered unfavourable after the incidence of large-vessel vasculitis and development for this indication was terminated. Trial registration NCT03044353 (2 February 2017) and NCT03417830 (25 January 2018).

Abuse potential assessment of the new dual orexin receptor antagonist daridorexant in recreational sedative drug users as compared to suvorexant and zolpidem.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Abuse potential properties have been reported for the dual orexin receptor antagonists (DORAs) suvorexant and lemborexant. Daridorexant is a new DORA currently in late-stage clinical development. This randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo- and active-controlled six-period crossover study assessed its abuse potential in healthy recreational sedative drug users (n = 63). METHODS: In each study period, a single, oral, morning dose of either daridorexant (50, 100, and 150 mg), placebo, or active control, i.e. suvorexant (150 mg) or zolpidem (30 mg), was administered. Primary pharmacodynamic (PD) endpoint was the Emax of the drug-liking visual analog scale (VAS) assessed over 24 h. Several secondary subjective and objective PD endpoints were also assessed. RESULTS: Study validity was confirmed based on drug-liking of suvorexant and zolpidem greater than placebo applying a predefined 15-point validity margin (p < 0.0001). Drug-liking VAS Emax (mean; 95% confidence interval) of daridorexant at 50 mg (73.2; 69.0-77.5) was significantly lower compared to suvorexant (80.7; 77.0-84.5) and zolpidem (79.9; 76.2-83.5) (p < 0.001), but similar at 100 mg (79.1; 75.0-83.3) and 150 mg (81.3; 77.7, 84.8). Such dose-related patterns were also observed for most secondary endpoints. At each daridorexant dose, Drug-liking VAS scores were greater than placebo. Both control drugs and daridorexant were safe and the pharmacokinetics of daridorexant was consistent with earlier trials indicating quick absorption and elimination. CONCLUSIONS: In this large, valid human abuse potential study, daridorexant showed dose-related drug-liking among recreational sedative drug users with lower effects at the highest phase-3 dose, and similar effects at higher doses compared to supratherapeutic doses of suvorexant and zolpidem. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Study to Evaluate the Abuse Potential of ACT-541468 in Healthy Recreational Drug Users, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03657355?term=ACT-541468&draw=3&rank=18, NCT03657355.

Non-pharmacologic direct cost of a simplified strategy with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir for 8 weeks in naïve non-cirrhotic patients with hepatitis C implemented in clinical practice. The Just SIMPLE Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The emergence of highly tolerable, effective, and shorter duration direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) regimens offers the opportunity to simplify hepatitis C virus management but medical costs are unknown. Thus, we aimed to determine the direct medical costs associated with a combo-simplified strategy (one-step diagnosis and low monitoring) to manage HCV infection within an 8-week glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB) regimen in clinical practice in Spain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Healthcare resources and clinical data were collected retrospectively from medical charts of 101 eligible patients at 11 hospitals. Participants were adult, treatment naïve subjects with HCV infection without cirrhosis in whom a combo-simplified strategy with GLE/PIB for 8 weeks were programmed between Apr-2018 and Nov-2018. RESULTS: The GLE/PIB effectiveness was 100% (CI95%: 96.2-100%) in the mITT population and 94.1% (CI95%: 87.5-97.8%) in the ITT population. Three subjects discontinued the combo-simplified strategy prematurely, none of them due to safety reasons. Five subjects reported 8 adverse events, all of mild-moderate intensity. Combo-simplified strategy mean direct costs were 754.35±103.60€ compared to 1689.42€ and 2007.89€ of a theoretical 12-week treatment with 4 or 5 monitoring visits, respectively; and 1370.95€ and 1689.42€ of a theoretical 8-week with 3 or 4 monitoring visits, respectively. Only 4.9% of the subjects used unexpected health care resources. CONCLUSIONS: 8-week treatment with GLE/PIB combined with a combo simplified strategy in real-life offers substantial cost savings without affecting the effectiveness and safety compared to traditional approaches.

Cost-effectiveness of trifluridine/tipiracil as a third-line treatment of metastatic gastric cancer, including adenocarcinoma of the gastrohesophageal junction, among patients previously treated in Greece.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) compared with best supportive care (BSC) for the treatment of patients with metastatic gastric cancer(mGC), including gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma(GEJ), who have received at least two prior therapies for metastatic disease and are eligible for third-line treatment, in Greece. METHODS: A partitioned survival model was locally adapted from a public payer perspective over a 10-year time horizon. Clinical, safety and utility data were extracted from literature. Resource consumption data obtained from a panel of local experts using a questionnaire developed for the study was combined with unit costs obtained from official sources. All costs reflect the year 2020 (€). Outcomes of the model were patients' life years (LYs) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), total costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per QALY and LY gained. RESULTS: The total cost per patient was estimated to be €6,965 for FTD/TPI and €1,906 for BSC, while FTD/TPI was associated with 0.180 and 0.107 increments in LYs and QALYs, respectively, compared with BSC, resulting in an ICER of €47,144 per QALY gained and €28,112 per LY gained. CONCLUSION: FTD/TPI was estimated to be a cost-effective treatment option for eligible third line mGC patients, including GEJ in Greece.

Accelerating Clinical Development of Idasanutlin through a Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling Risk Assessment for CYP450 Isoenzyme-Related Drug-Drug Interactions.

Idasanutlin is a potent inhibitor of the p53-MDM2 interaction that enables reactivation of the p53 pathway, which induces cell cycle arrest and/or apoptosis in tumor cells expressing functional p53. It was investigated for the treatment of solid tumors and several hematologic indications such as relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia, polycythemia vera, or non-Hodgkin lymphoma. For safety reasons, it cannot be given in healthy volunteers for drug-drug interaction (DDI) explorations. This triggered the need for in silico explorations on top of the one available CYP3A clinical DDI study with posaconazole in solid tumor patients. Idasanutlin's clearance is dependent on CYP3A4/2C8 forming its major circulating metabolite M4, with contributions from UGT1A3 and biliary excretion. Idasanutlin and M4 have low permeability, very low clearance, and extremely low unbound fraction in plasma (<0.001), which makes in vitro data showing inhibition on CYP3A4/2C8 enzymes challenging to translate to clinical relevance. Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic models of idasanutlin and M4 have been established to simulate perpetrator and victim DDI scenarios and to evaluate whether further DDI studies in oncology patients are necessary. Modeling indicated that idasanutlin and M4 would show no or weak clinical inhibition of selective CYP3A4/2C8 substrates. Co-administered strong CYP3A and CYP2C8 inhibitors might lead to weak or moderate idasanutlin exposure increases, and the strong inducer rifampicin might cause moderate exposure reduction. As the simulated idasanutlin systemic exposure changes would be within the range of observed intrinsic variability, the target population can take co-medications that are either CYP2C8/3A4 inhibitors or weak/moderate CYP2C8/3A4 inducers without dose adjustment. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Clinical trials for idasanutlin are restricted to cancer patients, which imposes practical, scientific, and ethical challenges on drug-drug interaction investigations. Furthermore, idasanutlin and its major circulating metabolite have very challenging profiles of absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion including high protein binding, low permeability and a combination of different elimination pathways each with extremely low clearance. Nonetheless, physiologically-based pharmacokinetic models could be established and applied for drug-drug interaction risk assessment and were especially useful to provide guidance on concomitant medications in patients.

Trifluridine/Tipiracil in Combination with Bevacizumab in First-Line for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Way Forward. A Point of View Based on Cost-Effectiveness.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this analysis is to assess the pharmacological costs of trifluridine/tipiracil as first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients who were not candidates for combination with cytotoxic chemotherapies. DISCUSSION: TASCO1 Trial was considered (153 patients). Differences in costs between the 2 arms (trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab vs. capecitabine plus bevacizumab) was 9113 € (10 264 USD), with a cost savings of 1982 € (2232 USD) per month of overall survival (OS)-gain. CONCLUSION: Trifluridine/tipiracil could be consider a cost-effective treatment also in first-line for mCRC patients who were not candidates for combination with cytotoxic chemotherapies.