RESUMO
Emergency preparedness is a continuous quality improvement process through which roles and responsibilities are defined to effectively anticipate, respond to, and recover from the impact of emergencies. This process results in documented plans that provide a backbone structure for developing the core capacities to address health threats. Nevertheless, several barriers can impair an effective preparedness planning, as it needs a 360° perspective to address each component according to the best evidence and practice. Preparedness planning shares common principles with health technology assessment (HTA) as both encompass a multidisciplinary and multistakeholder approach, follow an iterative cycle, adopt a 360° perspective on the impact of intervention measures, and conclude with decision-making support. Our "Perspective" illustrates how each HTA domain can address different component(s) of a preparedness plan that can indeed be seen as a container of multiple HTAs, which can then be used to populate the entire plan itself. This approach can allow one to overcome preparedness barriers, providing an independent, systematic, and robust tool to address the components and ensuring a comprehensive evaluation of their value in the mitigation of the impact of emergencies.
Assuntos
Defesa Civil/organização & administração , Planejamento em Desastres/organização & administração , Avaliação da Tecnologia Biomédica/organização & administração , Defesa Civil/economia , Defesa Civil/normas , Planejamento em Desastres/economia , Planejamento em Desastres/normas , Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências/normas , HumanosAssuntos
Acidentes/mortalidade , Planejamento em Desastres/normas , Deslizamentos de Terra/mortalidade , Mineração , Prevenção de Acidentes/tendências , Planejamento em Desastres/tendências , Humanos , Joias/economia , Deslizamentos de Terra/prevenção & controle , Mineração/economia , Mineração/legislação & jurisprudência , Mianmar , Medição de RiscoRESUMO
Healthcare and education systems have been identified by various national and international organizations as the main pillars of communities' stability. Understanding the correlation between these main social services institutions is critical to determining the tipping point of communities following natural disasters. Despite being defined as social services stability indicators, to date, no studies have been conducted to determine the level of interdependence between schools and hospitals and their collective influence on their recoveries following extreme events. In this study, we devise an agent-based model to investigate the complex interaction between healthcare and education networks and their overall recovery, while considering other physical, social, and economic factors. We employ comprehensive models to simulate the functional processes within each facility and to optimize their recovery trajectories after earthquake occurrence. The results highlight significant interdependencies between hospitals and schools, including direct and indirect relationships, suggesting the need for collective coupling of their recovery to achieve full functionality of either of the two systems following natural disasters. Recognizing this high level of interdependence, we then establish a social services stability index, which can be used by policymakers and community leaders to quantify the impact of healthcare and education services on community resilience and social services stability.
Assuntos
Planejamento em Desastres/métodos , Administração Hospitalar/métodos , Desastres Naturais , Saúde Pública/métodos , Instituições Acadêmicas/organização & administração , Serviço Social/métodos , Planejamento em Desastres/organização & administração , Planejamento em Desastres/normas , Terremotos , Administração Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais , Humanos , Modelos Organizacionais , Saúde Pública/normas , Instituições Acadêmicas/normas , Instituições Acadêmicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Social/organização & administração , Serviço Social/normasRESUMO
The objective of this work is to present the key elements in the design of emergency management and response plans in scenarios where there has been loss of containment of chemical agents of acute effect focused in the protection of not routinely exposed in a determined occupational environment. To this purpose, a validation of the current criteria for the management of accidental releases is carried out, taking into account hypothetical risk scenarios. The essential elements of the emergency management system are stated, from a systemic perspective and the corresponding risk control actions; recommendations for their implementation are showed, taking as prototype hydrogen sulfide, a highly toxic gas. Non controlled emissions of toxic gases of acute effect from an occupational standpoint represents a priority because of their human and financial high toll. Design and implementation of an appropriate emergency plan for uncontrollable emissions of toxics chemical agents must be addressed.
Assuntos
Gases/toxicidade , Exposição Ocupacional/prevenção & controle , Indústria de Petróleo e Gás , Gestão de Riscos/normas , Planejamento em Desastres/normas , Humanos , Sulfeto de Hidrogênio/toxicidade , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Exposição Ocupacional/normas , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
Policy Points Reflecting on current response deficiencies, we offer a model for a national contingency supply chain cell (NCSCC) construct to manage the medical materials supply chain in support of emergencies, such as COVID-19. We develop the following: a framework for governance and response to enable a globally independent supply chain; a flexible structure to accommodate the requirements of state and county health systems for receiving and distributing materials; and a national material "control tower" to improve transparency and real-time access to material status and location. CONTEXT: Much of the discussion about the failure of the COVID-19 supply chain has centered on personal protective equipment (PPE) and the degree of vulnerability of care. Prior research on supply chain risks have focused on mitigating the risk of disruptions of specific purchased materials within a bounded region or on the shifting status of cross-border export restrictions. But COVID-19 has impacted every purchase category, region, and border. This paper is responsive to the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine recommendation to study and monitor disasters and to provide governments with course of action to satisfy legislative mandates. METHODS: Our analysis draws on our observations of the responses to COVID-19 in regard to acquisition and contracting problem-solving, our review of field discussions and interactions with experts, a critique of existing proposals for managing the strategic national stockpile in the United States a mapping of the responses to national contingency planning phases, and the identification of gaps in current national healthcare response policy frameworks and proposals. FINDINGS: Current proposals call for augmenting a system that has failed to deliver the needed response to COVID-19. These proposals do not address the key attributes for pandemic plan renewal: flexibility, traceability and transparency, persistence and responsiveness, global independence, and equitable access. We offer a commons-based framework for achieving the opportunities and risks which are responsive to a constellation of intelligence assets working in and across focal targets of global supply chain risk. CONCLUSIONS: The United States needs a "commons-based strategy" that is not simply a stockpile repository but instead is a network of repositories, fluid inventories, and analytic monitoring governed by the experts. We need a coordinated effort, a "commons" that will direct both conventional and new suppliers to meet demands and to eliminate hoarding and other behaviors.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Planejamento em Desastres/normas , Programas Governamentais/normas , Política de Saúde , Equipamento de Proteção Individual/provisão & distribuição , Equipamento de Proteção Individual/normas , Estoque Estratégico/normas , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Estados UnidosAssuntos
Infecções por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecções por Coronavirus/terapia , Atenção à Saúde/normas , Pneumonia Viral/diagnóstico , Pneumonia Viral/terapia , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Planejamento em Desastres/organização & administração , Planejamento em Desastres/normas , Humanos , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , EspanhaAssuntos
Betacoronavirus , Infecções por Coronavirus/prevenção & controle , Aglomeração , Planejamento em Desastres/organização & administração , Planejamento em Saúde/organização & administração , Desastres Naturais , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Pneumonia Viral/prevenção & controle , Bangladesh , COVID-19 , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/virologia , Planejamento em Desastres/economia , Planejamento em Desastres/normas , Desenvolvimento Econômico , Saúde Global/economia , Saúde Global/normas , Planejamento em Saúde/economia , Planejamento em Saúde/normas , Humanos , Índia , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Viral/virologia , Saúde Pública/economia , Saúde Pública/normas , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: During an influenza or coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic that results in acute respiratory distress, the number of available ventilators will not meet demand. In 2007, the New York State Task Force on Life and the Law and Department of Health released draft Guidelines for ethical allocation of ventilators for adults. In 2015, updated guidelines were released to ensure that: (1) revisions reflect the public's values and (2) the triage protocol is substantiated by evidence-based clinical data. We summarize the development and content of the 2015 Guidelines compared with the 2007 version, emphasizing new/revised aspects of the ethical considerations and clinical protocol. METHODS: We compared the 2007 and 2015 guidelines, with particular emphasis on the ethical issues and clinical protocols. RESULTS: The 2015 Guidelines retained much of the ethical and clinical framework of the 2007 draft. The triage protocol was revised using evidence-based clinical data. Patients with the highest likelihood of short-term survival with ventilator therapy have priority access. Protocol consists of exclusion criteria, the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, and periodic clinical assessments. Guidance is provided on secondary triage criteria. Other forms of medical intervention/palliative care and review of triage decisions are discussed. CONCLUSIONS: The 2015 Guidelines reflect advances in medicine and societal values and provide an evidenced-based framework to save the most lives. The framework could be adapted in other emergencies, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, that require ventilators.
Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Planejamento em Desastres/organização & administração , Alocação de Recursos para a Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Ventiladores Mecânicos/provisão & distribuição , Fatores Etários , Protocolos Clínicos , Planejamento em Desastres/normas , Guias como Assunto , Alocação de Recursos para a Atenção à Saúde/ética , Alocação de Recursos para a Atenção à Saúde/normas , Humanos , Escores de Disfunção Orgânica , Cuidados Paliativos/organização & administração , Pandemias , Saúde Pública , SARS-CoV-2 , Análise de Sobrevida , Triagem/organização & administraçãoRESUMO
Nurses are experienced leaders, understand how to improve quality and access to care, and have the essential skills to be an elected official. Knowing the key tasks to running a campaign is critical to achieving an elected office role. This article presents a call to action for nurse leaders, advice on running for office, and lessons learned from a nurse running for State Senate.
Assuntos
Liderança , Enfermeiras e Enfermeiros , Política , Planejamento em Desastres/normas , Doações , Política de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Pandemias , Apoio Social , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Urbanisation will be one of the defining demographic trends of the 21st century-creating unique opportunities for sustainable capacity development, as well as substantial risks and challenges for managing public health and health emergencies. Plans and policies for responding to public health emergencies are generally framed at higher levels of governance, but developing, improving and sustaining the capacities necessary for implementing these policies is a direct function of local-level authorities. Evaluating local-level public health capacities is an important process for identifying strengths and weaknesses that can impact the preparedness for, detection of and response to health security threats. However, while various evaluations and assessments exist for evaluating capacities at other levels, currently, there are no readily available health security assessments for the local-level. In this paper, we describe a tool-the Rapid Urban Health Security Assessment (RUHSA) Tool-that is based on a variety of other relevant assessments and guidance documents. Assessing capacities allow for local-level authorities to identify the strengths and weaknesses of their local health security systems, create multiyear action plans and prioritise opportunities for improving capacities, effectively engage with development partners to target resources effectively and develop compelling narratives and a legacy of leadership. While the RUHSA Tool was not designed to be used in the midst of a public health emergency, such as the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, it may also be adapted to inform a checklist for prioritising what capacities and activities a city needs to rapidly develop or to help focus requests for assistance.
Assuntos
Planejamento em Desastres/normas , Saúde Pública/normas , Medição de Risco/métodos , Saúde da População Urbana/normas , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Infecções por Coronavirus , Humanos , Influenza Humana , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral , SARS-CoV-2Assuntos
Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Planejamento em Desastres/métodos , Planejamento em Desastres/normas , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Adaptação Psicológica , COVID-19 , Infecções por Coronavirus/economia , Planejamento em Desastres/economia , Planejamento em Desastres/organização & administração , Economia/tendências , Humanos , Pandemias/economia , Pneumonia Viral/economia , Reino Unido/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Since December 2019, the world is potentially facing one of the most difficult infectious situations of the last decades. COVID-19 epidemic warrants consideration as a mass casualty incident (MCI) of the highest nature. An optimal MCI/disaster management should consider all four phases of the so-called disaster cycle: mitigation, planning, response, and recovery. COVID-19 outbreak has demonstrated the worldwide unpreparedness to face a global MCI.This present paper thus represents a call for action to solicitate governments and the Global Community to actively start effective plans to promote and improve MCI management preparedness in general, and with an obvious current focus on COVID-19.
Assuntos
Defesa Civil/normas , Infecções por Coronavirus , Planejamento em Desastres/normas , Incidentes com Feridos em Massa , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral , COVID-19 , Atenção à Saúde/normas , Saúde Global , Direitos Humanos/normas , Humanos , Incidentes com Feridos em Massa/classificação , Medição de RiscoRESUMO
The objective of the Caribbean Strong Summit was to plan an intersectoral summit to address the equity of community health and resilience for disaster preparedness, response and recovery and develop a set of integrated and actionable recommendations for Puerto Rico and the Caribbean Region post Hurricanes Irma and Maria. A three-day meeting was convened with a wide range of community, organizational and private sector leaders along with representatives from Puerto Rico, the Caribbean, the Americas, and global experts to generate recommendations for enhanced resilience based upon lessons learned and evidence-based approaches. More than 500 participants from the region gave 104 presentations with recommendations for resilience. Over 150 recommendations were generated and ranked for importance and actionability by participants. A representative sample of these are presented along with five major themes for building health resilient communities in the Caribbean. This summit was successful in compiling a set of integrated recommendations from more than 19 diverse sectors and in defining five major thematic areas for future work to enhance resilience for all types of future disasters. A follow-up meeting should be planned to continue this discussion and to showcase work that has been accomplished in these areas. A complete set of the recommendations from the Caribbean Strong Summit and their analysis and compilation would be published and should serve as a foundational effort to enhance preparedness and resiliency towards future disasters in the Caribbean.
Assuntos
Equidade em Saúde/normas , Resiliência Psicológica , Região do Caribe , Planejamento em Desastres/métodos , Planejamento em Desastres/normas , Equidade em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Porto RicoRESUMO
PURPOSE: To describe our hospital pharmacy department's preparation for an influx of critically ill patients during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and offer guidance on clinical pharmacy services preparedness for similar crisis situations. SUMMARY: Personnel within the department of pharmacy at a medical center at the US epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic proactively prepared a staffing and pharmacotherapeutic action plan in anticipation of an expected surge in admissions of critically ill patients with COVID-19 and expansion of acute care and intensive care unit (ICU) capacity. Guidance documents focusing on supportive care and pharmacotherapeutic treatment options were developed. Repurposing of non-ICU-trained clinical pharmacotherapy specialists to work collaboratively with clinician teams in ICUs was quickly implemented; staff were prepared for these duties through use of shared tools to facilitate education and practice standardization. CONCLUSION: As challenges were encountered at the initial peak of the pandemic, interdisciplinary collaboration and teamwork was crucial to ensure that all patients were proactively assessed and that their respective pharmacotherapeutic regimens were optimized.
Assuntos
Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , Conduta do Tratamento Medicamentoso/normas , Farmacêuticos/organização & administração , Serviço de Farmácia Hospitalar/normas , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Cuidados Críticos/organização & administração , Cuidados Críticos/normas , Estado Terminal , Planejamento em Desastres/organização & administração , Planejamento em Desastres/normas , Emergências , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/organização & administração , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/normas , Conduta do Tratamento Medicamentoso/organização & administração , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/organização & administração , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/normas , Serviço de Farmácia Hospitalar/organização & administração , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Papel Profissional , Recursos Humanos/organização & administração , Recursos Humanos/normasRESUMO
In spring 2011, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) released Public Health Preparedness Capabilities: National Standards for State and Local Planning. The capability standards provide a framework that supports state, local, tribal, and territorial public health agency preparedness planning and response to public health threats and emergencies. In 2017, a project team at the CDC Division of State and Local Readiness incorporated input from subject matter experts, national partners, and stakeholders to update the 2011 capability standards. As a result, CDC released the updated capability standards in October 2018, which were amended in January 2019. The original structure of the 15 capability standards remained unchanged, but updates were made to capability functions, tasks, and resource elements to reflect advances in public health emergency preparedness and response practices since 2011. When the number of functions and tasks in the 2018 capability standards were compared to those in the 2011 capabilities, only 20% (3/15) of the capabilities had a decrease in function number. The majority of changes were at the task level (task numbers changed in 80%, or 12/15, capabilities) in the 2018 version. The capability standards provide public health agencies with a practical framework, informed by updated science and tools, which can guide prioritization of limited resources to strengthen public health agency emergency preparedness and response capacities.
Assuntos
Defesa Civil/normas , Planejamento em Desastres/normas , Saúde Pública/normas , Fortalecimento Institucional/normas , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S./normas , Humanos , Alocação de Recursos/normas , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Rehabilitation plays a crucial role in natural disasters owing to the significant upsurge of survivors with complex and long-term disabling injuries. Rehabilitation professionals can minimize mortality, decrease disability, and improve clinical outcomes and participation. In disaster-prone countries, skilled rehabilitation workforce and services are either limited and/or comprehensive rehabilitation-inclusive disaster management plans are yet to be developed. The World Health Organization Emergency Medical Team initiative and guidelines provide structure and standardization to prepare, plan, and provide effective and coordinated care during disasters. Many challenges remain for implementation of these standards in disaster settings and integrating rehabilitation personnel.
Assuntos
Pessoas com Deficiência/reabilitação , Medicina de Desastres/normas , Planejamento em Desastres/normas , Desastres Naturais , Reabilitação/normas , Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Guias como Assunto/normas , Humanos , Organização Mundial da SaúdeRESUMO
One hospital's experiences during the Hurricane Harvey disaster are reviewed and detailed using the strategic technique of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats analysis. Three leadership behaviors, adaptability, empowerment, and social justice, are discussed relative to organizational resiliency. This hospital's journey during Hurricane Harvey is analyzed using these leadership behaviors in a detailed strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats analysis format. Key lessons learned from this exercise are presented and are applicable to other disaster situations facing hospital performance.
Assuntos
Defesa Civil/organização & administração , Tempestades Ciclônicas , Planejamento em Desastres , Hospitais , Assistência Perinatal , Resiliência Psicológica/ética , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Planejamento em Desastres/métodos , Planejamento em Desastres/normas , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde , Hospitais/ética , Hospitais/normas , Humanos , Liderança , Enfermagem Neonatal/métodos , Enfermagem Neonatal/normas , Cultura Organizacional , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/organização & administração , Assistência Perinatal/ética , Assistência Perinatal/organização & administração , TexasRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Disasters can disrupt the existing health system affecting the whole population, but especially vulnerable people such as pregnant women, new mothers and their babies. Despite the global progress in maternal, newborn and child health (MNCH) programmes over the years, emergency responses after a disaster are often poor. Post-disaster health promotion could play an important role in improving MNCH outcomes. However, evidence remains limited on the effect of post disaster health promotion activities in low-income countries such as Nepal. METHODS: This is an uncontrolled before and after study conducted in Dhading district which was severely affected by the 2015 earthquake in Nepal. The study participants were mothers who had a child in the previous 12 months. The intervention was implemented between 2016 and 2018 and included community-engagement health promotion activities where the local stakeholders and resources were mobilized. The outcome variables included: knowledge of danger signs of pregnancy, childbirth and in newborns; and behaviours including ever attending antenatal care (ANC), a minimum of four ANC sessions and having an institutional delivery. Data were analysed using chi-squared tests, independent sample t-tests and multiple logistic regression models. RESULTS: In total 364 mothers were recruited in the pre-intervention group and 377 in the post-intervention group. The post-intervention group was more likely to have knowledge of at least three danger signs in pregnancy (AOR [Adjusted Odds Ratio] = 2.96, P<0.001), at least three danger signs in childbirth (AOR = 3.8, P<0.001), and at least five danger signs in newborns (AOR = 1.56, P<0.001) compared to the pre-intervention group. The mothers in the post-intervention group were also more likely to ever attend ANC (AOR = 7.18, P<0.001), attend a minimum of four ANC sessions (AOR = 5.09, P<0.001), and have institutional deliveries (AOR = 2.56, P<0.001). Religious minority groups were less likely to have knowledge of all danger signs compared to the majority Hindu group. Mothers from poorer households were also less likely to attend four ANC sessions. Mothers with higher education were more likely to have knowledge of all the danger signs. Mothers whose husbands had achieved higher education were also more likely to have knowledge of danger signs and have institutional deliveries. CONCLUSION: Health promotion intervention helped the disaster-affected mothers in improving the knowledge and behaviours related to MNCH. However, the vulnerable population would need more support to gain benefit from such intervention.