Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 155
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Intervalo de ano de publicação
4.
Nat Food ; 5(4): 323-331, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38519597

RESUMO

For both research and practice, it is paramount to understand what, where and when agri-environmental policies have been put in place. Here we present a database of 6,124 agri-environmental policies implemented between 1960 and 2022 in about 200 countries. The database comprises a wide range of policy types (including regulations and payment schemes) and goals (such as biodiversity conservation, safer pesticide use and reducing nutrient pollution). We illustrate the application of the database by exploring the association between economic development and agri-environmental policies and between the soil-related, agri-environmental policies of countries and their border discontinuities in cropland erosion. A strong, positive link between economic development and implemented agri-environmental policies is revealed, and it is found that 43% of all global border discontinuities in soil erosion between countries can be explained by differences in their policies.


Assuntos
Agricultura , Política Ambiental , Humanos , Agricultura/história , Biodiversidade , Conservação dos Recursos Naturais/legislação & jurisprudência , Desenvolvimento Econômico , Política Ambiental/legislação & jurisprudência , Política Ambiental/tendências , Política Ambiental/história , História do Século XX , História do Século XXI , Solo/química
6.
Nature ; 623(7989): 982-986, 2023 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38030781

RESUMO

Growing consumption is both necessary to end extreme poverty1and one of the main drivers of greenhouse gas emissions2, creating a potential tension between alleviating poverty and limiting global warming. Most poverty reduction has historically occurred because of economic growth3-6, which means that reducing poverty entails increasing not only the consumption of people living in poverty but also the consumption of people with a higher income. Here we estimate the emissions associated with the economic growth needed to alleviate extreme poverty using the international poverty line of US $2.15 per day (ref. 7). Even with historical energy- and carbon-intensity patterns, the global emissions increase associated with alleviating extreme poverty is modest, at 2.37 gigatonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent per year or 4.9% of 2019 global emissions. Lower inequality, higher energy efficiency and decarbonization of energy can ease this tension further: assuming the best historical performance, the emissions for poverty alleviation in 2050 will be reduced by 90%. More ambitious poverty lines require more economic growth in more countries, which leads to notably higher emissions. The challenge to align the development and climate objectives of the world is not in reconciling extreme poverty alleviation with climate objectives but in providing sustainable middle-income standards of living.


Assuntos
Dióxido de Carbono , Desenvolvimento Econômico , Política Ambiental , Aquecimento Global , Gases de Efeito Estufa , Pobreza , Dióxido de Carbono/análise , Desenvolvimento Econômico/estatística & dados numéricos , Desenvolvimento Econômico/tendências , Aquecimento Global/prevenção & controle , Aquecimento Global/estatística & dados numéricos , Gases de Efeito Estufa/análise , Renda , Pobreza/prevenção & controle , Pobreza/estatística & dados numéricos , Política Ambiental/legislação & jurisprudência , Política Ambiental/tendências
14.
PLoS One ; 16(12): e0261342, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34914798

RESUMO

In 2016, China implemented an environmental protection tax (EPTL2016) to promote the transformation and upgrading of heavily polluting industries through tax leverage. Using panel data of China's listed companies, this study assesses the treatment effects of the EPTL2016 on the transformation and upgrading of heavily polluting firms by incorporating the intermediary role of the financial market. The empirical findings show that the EPTL2016 significantly reduced the innovation investment and productivity of heavily polluting firms but had no significant effect on fixed-asset investment. Additionally, EPTL2016 reduced the supply of bank loans to heavily polluting firms and increased the value of growth options for private enterprises and the efficiency of the supply of long-term loans to heavily polluting firms. Although the environmental policy of EPTL2016 benefits the transformation and upgrading of heavily polluting industries in many aspects, it generally hinders the industrial upgrading because of the reduction of bank loans.


Assuntos
Política Ambiental/economia , Poluição Ambiental/prevenção & controle , Impostos/economia , China , Comércio/legislação & jurisprudência , Conservação dos Recursos Naturais/economia , Conservação dos Recursos Naturais/métodos , Política Ambiental/tendências , Poluentes Ambientais/economia , Poluição Ambiental/economia , Metalurgia/legislação & jurisprudência , Setor Privado/legislação & jurisprudência , Impostos/tendências
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA