Clinical and Economic Impact of Wound Care Using a Polyurethane Foam Multilayer Dressing.

OBJECTIVE: To study the impact of a newly introduced dressing on efficiency and quality of care in routine clinical practice in a Spanish community setting. DESIGN AND SETTING: An ambispective multicenter observational study was conducted in 24 primary care centers and 6 nursing homes in 4 different Spanish regions. The study was carried out between November 2017 and March 2019. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTION: A total of 128 wounds in 94 patients (primary care, n = 79; nursing home, n = 15) were analyzed before and 4 weeks after switching to the study dressing. OUTCOME MEASURES: Frequency of dressing changes; secondary outcomes were change in the mean wound area and weekly cost and patient and provider satisfaction. MAIN RESULTS: The mean number of dressing changes was significantly reduced with the study dressing from 3.14 ± 1.77 changes per week to 1.66 ± 0.87 (P < .001), a 47.1% reduction in frequency. Wound area significantly reduced from 9.90 ± 19.62 cm to 7.10 ± 24.33 cm. In addition, a 58.7% reduction in weekly costs was achieved with the intervention. Patients and providers agreed that their satisfaction with wound care improved. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the study dressing in routine clinical practice could lead to a major improvement in both efficiency and quality of wound care. Its use could reduce wound care-related costs through improvements in healing and a reduced frequency of dressing changes. It also enhanced the wound care experience from the perspective of both patients and providers.

A multilayer polyurethane foam dressing for pressure ulcer prevention in older hip fracture patients: an economic evaluation.

OBJECTIVE: Hospital-acquired pressure ulcers (PU) have a substantial negative impact on patients and continue to impose a cost burden on hospital providers. Since the incidence of fragility fracture is growing, driven by the increase in the older population, it is expected that the overall incidence of associated complications will also increase accordingly. The aim of this economic evaluation was to determine whether the use of a multilayer, silicone-adhesive polyurethane foam dressing (ALLEVYN LIFE, Smith & Nephew, UK) alongside standard prevention (SP) for the prevention of PUs in older patients with hip fractures is a cost-effective strategy, compared with SP alone. METHOD: A decision-analytic model was constructed to determine the incremental cost and effectiveness of the foam dressing strategy from the perspectives of the Italian and US hospital systems. We also performed one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: The foam dressing intervention was found to be cost saving and more effective than SP in both Italy and the US. Switching to foam dressing and standard prevention would result in an expected cost saving of €733 per patient in Italy and $840 per patient in the US, reducing the per-patient cost of treating PUs by 37-69% and 36-68%, respectively. The one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses demonstrate that the strategy remains dominant over a range of values of the input variables. CONCLUSION: The foam dressing intervention is likely to be a cost-effective strategy compared with standard prevention alone.

Clinical assessment of a foam dressing containing growth factor-enhancing hydrated polyurethanes.

OBJECTIVE: This study assesses a novel dressing concept in venous leg ulcer (VLU) patients. It is based on boosting endogenous growth factor activities synthesised by functional granulation tissue. METHODS: Patients received treatment for eight weeks with a hydrated polyurethane-containing foam dressing plus concomitant compression therapy. Wound area reduction (WAR), percentage of wounds achieving a relative WAR of ≥40% and ≥60%, wound pain ratings for the last 24 hours and at dressing changes, EQ-5D Quality of Life questionnaire data, dressing handling and safety parameters were recorded. RESULTS: There were 128 patients who received treatment and data for 123 wound treatment courses were documented. Wound area size decreased from 13.3±9.8cm2 to 10.5±12.2cm2 at week eight and median relative WAR was 48.8%. At week eight, a relative WAR ≥40% was reached by 54.5% of the wounds, 41.5% reached a relative WAR of ≥60% and complete healing was observed in 13.5% of wounds. Median wound pain ratings (last 24 hours before dressing change) declined significantly from 30 to 15.5 (100 visual analogue scale [VAS], p=0.0001) and pain at dressing changes from 30 to 12.5 (p≤0.0001). The EQ-5D VAS rating increased from 58.4±19.2mm to 63.1±19.1mm (p=0.0059). CONCLUSION: This clinical assessment shows that the concept of boosting endogenous growth factors through hydrated polyurethanes has the potential to accelerate WAR in VLU patients while decreasing pain levels and improving quality of life parameters.

Cost comparison of pressure ulcer preventive dressings: hydrocolloid dressing versus transparent polyurethane film.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the costs of using a transparent polyurethane film (PF) and hydrocolloid dressing (HD) in the prevention of pressure ulcers (PUs). METHOD: This descriptive, observational, longitudinal, comparative study was conducted in the intensive care units, coronary care unit and medical clinic of a charity hospital in Brazil. Data were collected during a 30-day study period, consisting of physical examination, assessment of risk factors for PU development and application of the Braden scale, which were performed at inclusion in the study and once daily during hospitalisation. Either PF or HD was applied bilaterally in the sacral and trochanteric regions for prevention of PUs in patients at a moderate to high risk of PUs according to the Braden scale, and costs of using PU preventive dressings were estimated. RESULTS: The mean total costs per dressing change per patient when using the HD and PF to prevent PUs were 413.60 BRL and 74.04 BRL, respectively. There were significant between-group differences in mean costs for all variables, except for saline solution and nurse-technician services. CONCLUSION: Results showed that the mean cost per dressing change per patient was lower when using the transparent PF than when using the HD.

Cost of dressings for prevention of sacral pressure ulcers. / Custos de coberturas para a prevenção de úlcera por pressão sacral.

OBJECTIVE: to identify costs of dressings to prevent sacral pressure ulcers in an adult intensive care unit in Paraná, Brazil. METHODS: secondary analysis study with 25 patients admitted between October 2013 and March 2014, using transparent polyurethane film (n=15) or hydrocolloid dressing (n=10) on the sacral region. The cost of each intervention was based on the unit amount used in each type of dressing, and its purchase price (transparent film = R$15.80, hydrocolloid dressing = R$68.00). RESULTS: the mean cost/patient was R$23.17 for use of transparent film and R$190.40 for use of hydrocolloid dressing. The main reason for changing the dressing was detachment. CONCLUSION: the transparent film was the most economically advantageous alternative to prevent sacral pressure ulcers in critical care patients. However, additional studies should be carried out including assessment of the effectiveness of both dressings.

Custos de coberturas para a prevenção de úlcera por pressão sacral / Costo de apósitos para la prevención de la úlcera por presión sacra / Cost of dressings for prevention of sacral pressure ulcers

RESUMO Objetivo: identificar os custos com coberturas na prevenção de úlcera por pressão sacral em uma Unidade de Terapia Intensiva para Adultos do Paraná, Brasil. Métodos: pesquisa de análise secundária com 25 pacientes internados entre outubro/2013 e março/2014, que utilizaram filme transparente de poliuretano (n=15) ou placa hidrocoloide (n=10) na região do sacro. O custo de cada intervenção se baseou na quantidade unitária utilizada, em cada tipo de cobertura e seu preço de aquisição (filme transparente = R$15,80, hidrocoloide = R$68,00). Resultados: O custo médio/paciente foi de R$23,17 para uso do filme transparente e de R$190,40 para uso de hidrocoloide. O principal motivo para a troca de cobertura foi o descolamento. Conclusão: O filme transparente consistiu na alternativa economicamente mais vantajosa para a prevenção de úlcera por pressão sacral em pacientes críticos; mas são necessários estudos adicionais que incluam a avaliação da efetividade de ambas as coberturas.

RESUMEN Objetivo: identificar los costos de apósitos para la prevención de úlcera por presión sacra en una Unidad de Terapia Intensiva de Adultos en Paraná, Brasil. Métodos: investigación de análisis secundario con 25 pacientes internados entre octubre de 2013 y marzo de 2014, que utilizaron film transparente de poliuretano (n=15) o placa hidrocoloide (n=10) en la región sacra. El costo de cada intervención se basó en la cantidad unitaria utilizada, en cada tipo de cobertura y su costo de adquisición (film transparente = R$15,80, hidrocoloide = R$68,00). Resultados: el costo promedio/paciente fue de R$23,17 usando film transparente y R$190,40 usando hidrocoloide. El principal motivo de cambio fue la mala adhesión. Conclusión: el film tranparente constituyó la alternativa económica más ventajosa para la prevención de la úlcera por presión sacra en pacientes críticos, pero se necesita de estudios adicionales que incluyan la evaluación de la efectividad de ambos apósitos.

ABSTRACT Objective: to identify costs of dressings to prevent sacral pressure ulcers in an adult intensive care unit in Paraná, Brazil. Methods: secondary analysis study with 25 patients admitted between October 2013 and March 2014, using transparent polyurethane film (n=15) or hydrocolloid dressing (n=10) on the sacral region. The cost of each intervention was based on the unit amount used in each type of dressing, and its purchase price (transparent film = R$15.80, hydrocolloid dressing = R$68.00). Results: the mean cost/patient was R$23.17 for use of transparent film and R$190.40 for use of hydrocolloid dressing. The main reason for changing the dressing was detachment. Conclusion: the transparent film was the most economically advantageous alternative to prevent sacral pressure ulcers in critical care patients. However, additional studies should be carried out including assessment of the effectiveness of both dressings.

A cost-effective treatment for severe generalized erosion and loss of vertical dimension of occlusion: laboratory-fabricated composite resin restorations.

This case report describes preventive and restorative treatment planning for a 56-year-old female patient with severe, chronic, poorly controlled gastroesophageal reflux disease and resulting loss of vertical dimension of occlusion. First, the demineralization process was controlled through collaboration with the patient's physician, and measures were taken to restore adequate stimulated salivary flow. Then, for financial reasons, indirect laboratory-fabricated composite resin restorations were adhesively bonded to replace lost tooth structure and reestablish the patient's collapsed vertical dimension. Indirect-laboratory fabricated restorations can be a cost-effective alternative to direct composite resin or all-ceramic restorations for the treatment of chronic severe erosion, but there are no long-term clinical reports in the current literature to support or contraindicate the use of indirect composites for this type of clinical application. Therefore, careful, long-term follow-up evaluations are planned for this patient.

A novel option in negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) for chronic and acute wound care.

INTRODUCTION: Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has become a widely accepted technique in treatment of all kinds of wounds. After a long period of clinical application of the V.A.C.™ system (KCI Inc., San Antonio, Texas, USA) a number of options for delivery of NPWT are now commercially available. An urgent need exists for evidence demonstrating clinical efficacy of these new devices to support clinicians regarding their choice of NPWT. METHODS: 42 patients with an acute or chronic wound were randomly assigned to either treatment by V.A.C.™ (group A) or therapy with an alternative newly available polyurethane foam-based NPWT system (RENASYS GO™ - F/P, Smith & Nephew GmbH) (group B). In both groups NPWT was applied after surgical debridement to prepare the wound bed for skin grafting. After skin grafting NPWT was applied additionally to secure skin grafts and improve grafts survival. Primary outcome measures were the time to complete healing (days) and duration of the NPWT application (days). Secondary outcome measures were the number of dressing changes and reported complications. In addition, we evaluated the cost-benefit in the clinical implementation. RESULTS: There were no significant differences comparing the investigated parameters between both groups. Especially average time to complete healing and average time NPWT was applied did not differ (p>0.05). No complications occurred in either group. By an almost identical supply agreement of both providers for our hospital RENASYS™ system appeared to be more cost-effective. CONCLUSION: After a long period of preserving a monopoly market position of the V.A.C.™ system, a new comparable option was successfully tested in this preliminary study. The polyurethane foam-based NPWT system (RENASYS GO™ - F/P, Smith & Nephew GmbH) is an efficient and cost-effective alternative NPWT system, which we effectively implemented in therapeutic management of different kinds of wounds.

Management of split-thickness skin graft donor site: a prospective clinical trial for comparison of five different dressing materials.

INTRODUCTION: Split-thickness skin grafting (STSG) is a frequently used reconstructive technique but is associated with a large variation regarding the management of the donor site. The aim of this study is to compare five different dressings for management of the STSG donor site in a prospective trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 100 consecutive patients, in whom reconstruction with STSG was performed, were included into the study. The grafts are harvested in a standard manner and the donor sites were dressed with one of the following materials: Aquacel® Ag, Bactigras® with Melolin®, Comfeel® Plus Transparent, Opsite® Flexigrid and Adaptic®. The materials are compared regarding to the time required for complete epithelialization, pain sensed by the patients, incidence of infection, scar formation, ease of application and the cost. RESULTS: The earliest complete epithelialization was observed for Aquacel® Ag and the latest for Bactigras® with Melolin®·Comfeel® Plus Transparent was the most painless dressing and Bactigras® with Melolin® was the most painful. The incidence of infection was highest for Bactigras® with Melolin®·Opsite® Flexigrid was the most economical dressing and Aquacel® Ag was the most expensive one. CONCLUSION: The aim is to provide the earliest complete epithelialization with minimal patient discomfort and lower cost in management of the STSG donor sites. None of the tested materials were ideal regarding these criteria, but Comfeel® Plus Transparent, as the least painful and one of the most economical materials, may be offered as the dressing of choice among the tested materials.

Assessment of amniotic and polyurethane membrane dressings in the treatment of burns.

As allograft and xenografts are not available in Islamic countries, amniotic membrane seems to be an effective alternative in the management of deep burns. Its proven bioactivities and modest price suggest that it might be superior to synthetic dressings. Forty-six patients were enrolled in this randomized, controlled clinical trial conducted in the Burn Unit at Suez Canal University Hospital, Ismailia, Egypt. All age groups and both gender were included in the study. Only patients with less than 50% total body surface area burned were included, thus minimizing the dropouts in both groups. All were either second or third degree. These patients were randomly assigned either to group I: amniotic membrane (Biomembrane) dressing, or group II: polyurethane membrane (Tegaderm) dressing. Those in group I demonstrated a significantly lower rate of infection and required less frequent dressing changes than those in group II. They also sustained less electrolyte and albumin loss. The rate of healing in the amniotic membrane group was significantly faster than in the polyurethane group. Furthermore, pain was significantly less when Biomembrane was used. Based on these findings, we recommend the use of lyophilized gamma-irradiated amniotic membrane as an effective alternative for allograft and xenografts in Islamic countries and the Jewish population.

Evaluation of dressings used with local anaesthetic cream and for peripheral venous cannulation.

AIM: To compare four polyurethane dressings manufactured by two different companies for use in children. METHOD: Seventy-eight dressings were applied to secure either local anaesthetic creams (n = 62) or intravenous cannulae (n = 16). Each dressing was evaluated for ease of application, security and ease of removal, using a simple scoring system. RESULTS: 84 per cent of Opsite flexigrid and 90 per cent of Tegaderm local anaesthetic cream dressings were rated as easy or very easy to apply. Opsite flexigrid was felt to be more secure, whereas Tegaderm was easier to remove. The Tegaderm cannula dressing was easier to apply than the iv3000 dressing. CONCLUSION: There was little difference between the two brands, including costs.

Costs and prices of single dental fillings in Europe: a micro-costing study.

Dental fillings represent an established procedure to treat tooth decay. The present paper provides a cost comparison of dental filling procedures across nine European countries. More specifically, the paper aims to estimate the costs and prices (i.e. reimbursement fees) of a single dental filling procedure in an approximately 12-year-old child with a toothache in a lower molar who presents at a dental practice, as described in a case vignette. Both amalgam and composite fillings were examined. Total costs were determined by identifying resource use and unit costs for the following cost components: diagnostic procedures, labour, materials, drugs, and overheads. Altogether, 49 practices provided data for the cost calculations. Mean total costs per country varied considerably, ranging from 8 euros to 156 euros. Labour costs were the most important cost driver in all practices, comprising 58% of total costs. Overhead costs were the second-most important cost component in the majority of countries. Actual cost differences across practices within countries were relatively small. Cost variations between countries were primarily due to differences in unit costs, especially for labour and overheads, and only to a lesser extent to differences in resource use. Finally, cost estimates for a single dental filling procedure based on reimbursement fees led to an underestimation of the total costs by approximately 50%.

Choice of dressing has a major impact on blistering and healing outcomes in orthopaedic patients.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of three postoperative dressings on orthopaedic wound healing. METHOD: Three hundred orthopaedic patients were divided into three treatment groups and allocated to management with one of three dressings: Primapore, Tegaderm with pad, and OpSite Post-Op. Staff completed a questionnaire to evaluate the wound progression. Outcome measures were the presence of infection, blistering and the number of dressing changes required. RESULTS: There was a significantly lower incidence of blistering with OpSite Post-Op (6%) than Tegaderm with pad (16%) and Primapore (24%) (p<0.001). Patients in the OpSite Post-Op group had the lowest exudate levels. CONCLUSION: Dressings that employ a clear film and have a high moisture vapour transmission rate have been shown to reduce both the rate of blistering and wound discharge. The additional expense inherent in using such dressings may, in reality, prove cost-effective because of the reduced need for dressings changes and the subsequent earlier discharge of these patients from hospital with an uncomplicated wound.

Comparison of hydrocellular foam and calcium alginate in the healing and comfort of split-thickness skin-graft donor sites.

This is a comparative study of a hydrocellular foam (Allevyn, Smith and Nephew) and a calcium alginate (Kaltostat, ConvaTec) in dressing split-thickness skin-graft donor sites. The dressing materials were used in equal halves of each donor site in 20 patients undergoing skin-graft harvest. The donor sites dressed with Allevyn showed a tendency to earlier healing, but this was not confirmed statistically. However, Allevyn was found to be more comfortable than Kaltostat and this difference was statistically significant. Due to its increased patient comfort, cheaper cost and comparable time to healing with Kaltostat, the authors recommend the use of Allevyn as a dressing for split-thickness skin-graft donor sites.

OpSite Plus in the management of exuding wounds.

This article discusses the use of OpSite Plus (formerly known as OpSite Post-Op ) in the community setting. This semi permeable film dressing with an absorbent pad was evaluated by the community hospital and by practice and district nurses within Plymouth's NHS Primary Care Trust.

Central line exit sites: which dressing?

Recent developments in dressings for intravenous access sites include a transparent dressing which does not retain moisture. This article describes a randomised controlled trial to compare the new dressing with a standard dressing. There was no difference in sepsis rates between the two groups, and both methods had advantages and disadvantages. The authors suggest that cost may be a factor in choice of dressing.

[Drug clinics. How I treat a cutaneous ulcer in outpatients]. / Pharma-clinics. Comment je traite.... Un ulcère cutané en ambulatoire.

Leg ulcers are the source of high social and economical costs in the domain of geriatric dermatology. The present review summarizes the indications of antiseptics and of sophisticated wound dressings including hydrogels, hydrocolloids, alginates, polyurethane foams and films, as well as formulations combatting the smelly aspects of ulcers.

In vitro function and durability assessment of a novel polyurethane heart valve prosthesis.

While flexible-leaflet, central-flow prosthetic heart valves promise relief from anticoagulation therapy, they continue to be restricted by inadequate durability. In consequence, a novel trileaflet valve, made entirely from polyurethane, has been developed. A batch of 6 consecutively manufactured polyurethane valves was subjected to hydrodynamic function and accelerated fatigue testing. Computerized data acquisition and control systems have been introduced to improve valve testing methodologies. In terms of hydrodynamic function, the polyurethane valve demonstrates transvalvular pressure gradients similar to those for a bioprosthetic valve (Carpentier-Edwards) and levels of retrograde flow significantly less than those for either the bioprosthetic valve or a bileaflet mechanical valve (St Jude Medical). The equivalent of 10 years of cycling without failure has been exceeded by all 6 polyurethane valves in accelerated fatigue tests with 2 valves remaining intact after 674 million cycles (equivalent to approximately 17 years) in continuing tests. Highspeed photography revealed considerable differences in leaflet motion between valves cycled at accelerated and physiological rates.

Uso del poliuretano en la atención médica del niño / Use of polyurethane in medical care in children

miariamente en instituciones sanitarias públicas o privadas se requieren del uso de grandes cantidades de algodón, ya sea como tal o elaborado en forma de gasa para la confección de artículos usados en la práctica médica, curas intervenciones quirúrgicas, inmovilizaciones, inyecciones, etc. Existe en el mercado un producto que puede ser utilizado en medicina y que puede reemplazar al algodón, en la medica diaria como es el Poliuretano. Se trata de una espuma o material esponjoso, el cual resulta idóneo como sustituto del tejido de algodón en la práctica de la cirugía, con la ventaja que puede ser utilizado un mayor número de veces, siendo menos costoso. En Venezuela, debido al alto costo de los insumos médicos-quirúrgicos, se hace necesario un sustituto del algodón que sea esequible, inocuo, reciclable, almacenable, empaquetable y esterilizable. El Poliuretano reúne todos estos requisitos para ser usado en el campo médico, por ello presentamos el estudio preliminar y la casuística obtenida con el uso de esta material en el área quirúrgica.