Novel Approach for the Bioequivalence Assessment of Topical Cream Formulations: Model-Based Analysis of Tape Stripping Data Correctly Concludes BE and BIE.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was (a) to suggest a novel dermatopharmacokinetic (DPK) approach from which pharmacokinetic parameters relevant to the bioequivalence (BE) assessment of a topical formulation can be deduced while circumventing the need for numerous measurements and assumptions, and (b) to investigate whether this approach enables the correct conclusion of BE and bioinequivalence (BIE). METHODS: Bioequivalent and bioinequivalent formulations of acyclovir were compared versus a reference product (Zovirax®). Tape Stripping was conducted at only one dose duration during the uptake phase to generate drug content in stratum corneum versus time profiles, each time point corresponding to one stripped layer. Nonlinear mixed effect modeling (ADAPT5®) (MLEM algorithm) was used to fit the DPK data and to estimate the rate (Kin) and extent (FS) of drug absorption/input into the skin. Results were evaluated using the average BE approach. RESULTS: Estimated exposure metrics were within the usual BE limits for the bioequivalent formulation (FS: 102.4 [90%CI: 97.5-107.7]; Kin: 94.2 [90%CI: 83.7-106.0]), but outside those limits for the bioinequivalent formulation (FS: 43.4 [90%CI: 27.9-67.6]; Kin: 54.5 [90%CI: 36.6-81.1]). CONCLUSIONS: The proposed novel DPK approach was shown to be successful, robust and applicable to assess BE and BIE correctly between topical formulations.

An intranasal irritation assessment of antibacterial ointment alone or in combination with mupirocin versus Bactroban Nasal in rabbits.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential irritating effects and the systemic exposure level of an antibacterial ointment containing REP8839 as a single agent or in combination with mupirocin versus Bactroban Nasal in rabbits. Additionally, the reversibility of REP8839 effects during a 14-day recovery period was assessed. Five treatment groups of six male and six female New Zealand White rabbits received dose levels of 1%, 2%, and 4% REP8839, 2% Bactroban Nasal, or 2% REP8839/2% mupirocin combination. One additional group of six animals/sex served as the control and received the vehicle, Petrolatum/Softisan 649. The test article or vehicle was administered to all groups via topical administration to the external nares, twice a day (approx. 8h intervals between the doses) for 21 consecutive days, at a dose volume of 100 microL per nare/dose for a total of 400 microL per day (200 microL per nare). Two animals/sex/group were maintained for a 14-day recovery period. The external nares were reflected back and the mucosal lining was evaluated and scored for erythema and edema within 30-60 min following the first dose each day. Blood samples were collected from all animals at designated time points on Day 21 of the study to assess systemic exposure levels. Cross-sectioning of the nasal tract was conducted in all the groups for microscopic evaluation. Mucosal scoring of the nares did not reveal any edema or erythema in any of the dose groups with the antibacterial alone, with the combination product, or with Bactroban Nasal. Mean body weights and food consumption were not adversely impacted by the test articles. Minimal plasma exposure was observed in the rabbits (<5 ng/mL). The REP8839 groups did appear to have dose-responsive exposure (from below the limit of quantitation to 5 ng/mL with 1%, 2%, and 4% REP8839, respectively). Microscopic changes on the nasal sectioning noted in these animals were infrequent and considered incidental findings unrelated to administration of the test articles. In conclusion doses of up to 4% of REP8839 ointment as a single agent or 2% in the combination product, as well as 2% Bactroban Nasal, were not found to induce mucosal irritation when applied topically to the external nares twice a day for 21 consecutive days. Additionally, no delayed effects were observed in the recovery animals.

Assessment of value and applications of in vitro testing of topical dermatological drug products.

The FDA recently issued a guidance covering practices of scaleup and post approval changes with semisolids (SUPAC-SS). This guidance outlines the steps that must be taken by a company to maintain certification of its semisolid dermatological products after quantitative changes have been made in their compositions and/or after changes have been made in the sourcing of their key ingredients, in their processing, in their batch sizes, and/or after their site of manufacture has been relocated. A key element within the guidance is a release test to be used to determine if the diffusional release of a drug found in a formulation is the same after changes have been made to the formulation as it was prior to implementing the changes. The AAPS-FDA sponsored workshop was set up to explore this qualifying test. The stated aims of the workshop were: a) to illustrate the methodology and techniques of in vitro release testing, b) to show the sensitivity of in vitro release with respect to manufacturing variables and to variations in components and composition (of specific formulations), c) to recognize in vitro release testing as a useful procedure for SUPAC documentation, d) to highlight and evaluate other applications of in vitro release testing, e) to explore the degree to which in vitro release testing and bioavailability may be related, and f) to evaluate the role of in vitro release testing of topical dosage forms as a tool to improve product quality.