Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 227
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
4.
Capitation Manag Rep ; 12(4): 39-43, 37, 2005 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15913208

RESUMO

Union Health Services is celebrating its 50th year managing capitated patients. One measure of its success is the staff model HMO's ability to hold down premium hikes to 3.4% compared with the national average of 11.5%. Read about how the Chicago-based non-profit does it.


Assuntos
Capitação , Prática de Grupo Pré-Paga/economia , Sistemas Pré-Pagos de Saúde/economia , Sindicatos , Chicago , Current Procedural Terminology , Economia Médica , Prática de Grupo Pré-Paga/normas , Planos de Assistência de Saúde para Empregados/economia , Sistemas Pré-Pagos de Saúde/normas , Humanos , Sistemas Computadorizados de Registros Médicos , Medicina/normas , Organizações sem Fins Lucrativos , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde , Especialização
6.
Med Care ; 43(5): 428-35, 2005 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15838406

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare total outpatient costs of 4 common treatments for low-back pain (LBP) at 18-months follow-up. METHODS: Our work reports on findings from a randomized controlled trial within a large medical group practice treating HMO patients. Patients (n = 681) were assigned to 1 of 4 treatment groups, ie, medical care only (MD), medical care with physical therapy (MDPt), chiropractic care only (DC), or chiropractic care with physical modalities (DCPm). Total outpatient costs, excluding pharmaceuticals, were measured at 18 months. We did not perform a cost-effectiveness analysis because previously published findings showed no clinically meaningful difference in outcomes among the 4 treatment groups. Thirty-seven participants were lost to follow-up at 18 months, leaving a final sample size of n = 654. RESULTS: Adjusting for covariates, DC was 51.9% more expensive than MD (P < 0.001), DCPm 3.2% more expensive than DC (P = 0.76), and MDPt 105.8% more expensive than MD (P < 0.001). The adjusted mean outpatient costs per treatment group were 369 US dollars for MD, 560 US dollars for DC, 579 US dollars for DCPm, and 760 US dollars for MDPt. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first randomized trial to show higher costs for chiropractic care without producing better clinical outcomes, but our findings are likely to understate the costs of medical care with or without physical therapy because of the absence of pharmaceutical data. Physical therapy provided in combination with medical care and physical modalities provided in combination with chiropractic care do not appear to be cost-effective strategies for treatment of LBP; they produce higher costs without clinically significant improvements in outcome.


Assuntos
Quiroprática/economia , Prática de Grupo Pré-Paga/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Sistemas Pré-Pagos de Saúde/economia , Dor Lombar/economia , Dor Lombar/terapia , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/economia , Fatores Etários , California , Quiroprática/estatística & dados numéricos , Terapia Combinada/economia , Terapia Combinada/estatística & dados numéricos , Custo Compartilhado de Seguro/economia , Escolaridade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/economia , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/economia
8.
Health Aff (Millwood) ; Suppl Web Exclusives: W4-76-8, 2004.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15451970

RESUMO

Prepaid group practices (PGPs) are complex organizations that directly combine prepayment for health care with a comprehensive health care delivery system. PGPs' ability to manage their physician staffing efficiently must be placed in context with the cost and quality of their care. It seems unlikely that PGPs or their use of staff will proliferate. With increased integration of care through disease management programs and use of clinical information technology, it should be possible for the United States as a whole to come closer to achieving the care delivery goals that PGPs have set in the past.


Assuntos
Atenção à Saúde , Prática de Grupo Pré-Paga/organização & administração , Admissão e Escalonamento de Pessoal , Médicos/provisão & distribuição , Custos e Análise de Custo , Prática de Grupo Pré-Paga/economia , Prática de Grupo Pré-Paga/normas , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Estados Unidos
19.
Health Aff (Millwood) ; Suppl Web Exclusives: W3-275-82, 2003.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14527261

RESUMO

Despite widespread concern about denials of coverage by managed care organizations, little empirical information exists on the profile and outcomes of utilization review decisions. This study examines the outcomes of nearly a half-million coverage requests in two large medical groups that contract with health plans to deliver care and conduct utilization review. We found much higher denial rates than those previously reported. Denials were particularly common for emergency care and durable medical equipment. Retrospective requests were nearly four times more likely than prospective requests were to be denied, and when prospective requests were denied, it was more likely because the service fell outside the scope of covered benefits than because it was not medically necessary.


Assuntos
Prática de Grupo Pré-Paga/estatística & dados numéricos , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros/estatística & dados numéricos , Programas de Assistência Gerenciada/estatística & dados numéricos , Revisão da Utilização de Recursos de Saúde , California , Prática de Grupo Pré-Paga/economia , Humanos , Reembolso de Seguro de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Programas de Assistência Gerenciada/economia , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA