Assessment of the prevalence of inadequate iron intakes in premenopausal females based on the reference values of the European Food Safety Authority using cross-sectional food consumption data.

BACKGROUND: The iron intake requirement distribution for premenopausal females is not symmetric, which invalidates the EAR cut-point approach for assessing the prevalence of iron inadequacy. Therefore, Beaton's Full Probability Approach (PA) must be used. Although the PA requires information on the entire iron intake requirement distribution, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) only provided the EAR (50th percentile), 90th, 95th (population reference intake), and 97.5th percentiles. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to reliably estimate the prevalence of iron inadequacy in premenopausal females using the PA, based on the intake requirements established by EFSA, and compare the results with those obtained from the EAR cut-point method. METHODS: Habitual iron intakes were calculated using the statistical program to assess dietary exposure with data from 484 females (20-45 y) from the Dutch National Food Consumption Survey 2012-2016. Iron requirements of EFSA (including additionally obtained information) were applied. Results from the PA were compared to results obtained with the EAR cut-point method. Sensitivity analyses examined the impact of lower iron intake distributions on differences in estimated inadequate intakes between PA and EAR cut-point methods. RESULTS: A 2-fold higher prevalence of iron inadequacy among Dutch premenopausal females was observed when employing the PA compared to the EAR cut-point method, using EFSA's reference values. Sensitivity analysis showed that the EAR cut-point method could also result in large overestimations for populations with lower intake distributions. CONCLUSIONS: This study provided an example of using the PA method by using additionally derived information on the full requirement distribution underlying EFSA's reference values. Results showed once more the unsuitability of the EAR cut-point method to calculate the prevalence of iron inadequacy in premenopausal females. Hence, we recommend that institutions deriving dietary reference values provide all the information needed to use the correct method to determine inadequate intakes in the population.

Ribociclib en mujeres pre/perimenopáusicas con el diagnóstico de cáncer de mama RH(+) HER2(-) metastásico sin crisis visceral, ECOG 0-1 y que no hayan recibido terapia endocrina antihormonal previamente / Ribociclib in pre/perimenopausal women with a diagnosis of RH(+) HER2(-) metastatic breast cancer without visceral crisis, ECOG 0-1 and who have not previously received antihormonal endocrine therapy

INTRODUCCIÓN: Cuadro clínico: El cáncer de mama es la primera causa de muerte por neoplasia maligna en mujeres. A nivel mundial, en el 2022, se produjeron 2.3 millones de casos nuevos y 666 103 muertes por cáncer de mama. En Latinoamérica, se estimó que la tasa estandarizada de incidencia es de 48.7 casos nuevos por cada 100 000 habitantes. Sobre la carga de enfermedad, los reportes nacionales informan que el cáncer de mama tiene una incidencia de 37.6 casos nuevos por cada 100 000 habitantes y produjo 39 139 años de vida saludables perdidos (AVISA) así como 9 049 años vividos por discapacidad (AVD). Según los subtipos moleculares, el más frecuente es el subtipo RH(+) y HER2(-), representando el 58.2% de casos. No se dispone de datos específicos epidemiológicos en el Perú para mujeres pre/perimenopáusicas con cáncer de mama RH (+) HER2(-) que han fallado a primera línea de terapia endocrina. Tecnología sanitária: El ribociclib es un inhibidor de la cinasa 4 dependiente de las ciclinas (CDK4) y la cinasa 6 dependiente de ciclinas (CDK6). Estas cinasas son proteínas que inducen el crecimiento tumoral. En Perú, el ribociclib cuenta con registro sanitario (N° EE10867), otorgado por la Dirección General de Medicamentos Insumos y Drogas (DIGEMID). Actualmente, ribociclib no forma parte del Petitorio Nacional Único de Medicamentos Esenciales (PNUME). Justificación de la evaluación: Este informe de ETS-EMC se realizó a solicitud de Comité Farmacoterapéutico (CFT) del Instituto Regional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas del Sur (IREN SUR) mediante Oficio N°475- 2023-GRA/GRS/GR-IREN-SUR, en e

Excess morbidity and mortality associated with underuse of estrogen replacement therapy in premenopausal women who undergo surgical menopause.

BACKGROUND: Contrary to clinical guidelines, there has been a decrease over time in estrogen therapy use in premenopausal women undergoing bilateral oophorectomy for benign indications. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to estimate the excess morbidity and mortality associated with current patterns of estrogen therapy use in women who undergo bilateral oophorectomy with hysterectomy for benign indications. STUDY DESIGN: We developed 2 Bayesian sampling Markov state-transition models to estimate the excess disease incidence (incidence model) and mortality (mortality model). The starting cohort for both models were women who had undergone bilateral oophorectomy with hysterectomy for benign indications at the age of 45 to 49 years. The models tracked outcomes in 5-year intervals for 25 years. The incidence model estimated excess incidence of breast cancer, lung cancer, colorectal cancer, coronary heart disease, and stroke, whereas the mortality model estimated excess mortality due to breast cancer, lung cancer, coronary heart disease, and all-other-cause mortality. The models compared current rates of estrogen therapy use with optimal (100%) use and calculated the mean difference in each simulated outcome to determine excess disease incidence and death. RESULTS: By 25 years after bilateral oophorectomy with hysterectomy, there were an estimated 94 (95% confidence interval, -158 to -23) fewer colorectal cancer cases, 658 (95% confidence interval, 339-1025) more coronary heart disease cases, and 881 (95% confidence interval, 402-1483) more stroke cases. By 25 years after bilateral oophorectomy with hysterectomy, there were an estimated 189 (95% confidence interval, 59-387) more breast cancer deaths, 380 (95% confidence interval, 114-792) more coronary heart disease deaths, and 759 (95% confidence interval, 307-1527) more all-other-cause deaths. In sensitivity analyses where we defined estrogen therapy use as a duration of >2 years of use, these differences increased >2-fold. CONCLUSION: Underuse of estrogen therapy in premenopausal women who undergo oophorectomy is associated with substantial excess morbidity and mortality.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy With Ovarian Suppression in Premenopausal Patients With Hormone Receptor-Positive Early Breast Cancer in China.

PURPOSE: Endocrine therapy combined with ovarian function suppression (OFS) is recommended in intermediate- or high-risk patients among premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer. However, in China, the cost-effectiveness of this strategy compared with endocrine therapy alone is unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term cost-effectiveness of tamoxifen (TAM), TAM+OFS, and exemestane plus OFS (EXE+OFS). METHODS: On the basis of prognostic data from the Suppression of Ovarian Function Trial (SOFT), cost data from the Hospital Information System of the West China Hospital of Sichuan University, and health utility values from the published literature, a Markov model was established. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was used to compare the treatment strategies. RESULTS: In a 25-year simulation of adjuvant therapy in Chinese women with early breast cancer, the total costs of TAM, TAM+OFS, and EXE+OFS were $7821, $9318, and $9445, respectively. The quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were 11.615, 11.896, and 11.734 years, respectively. Compared with TAM, the ICERs of TAM+OFS and EXE+OFS were $5,327.4021/QALY and $13,647.0588/QALY, respectively. The ICERs of TAM+OFS and EXE+OFS were below the threshold of $32,517/QALY. The reliability and stability of the simulation results were verified using Monte Carlo simulation and sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSION: In the context of limited resources in China, TAM+OFS and EXE+OFS are cost-effective options compared with TAM.

Accuracy of IOTA Simple Rules, IOTA ADNEX Model, RMI, and Subjective Assessment for Preoperative Adnexal Mass Evaluation: The Experience of a Tertiary Care Referral Hospital.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of IOTA Simple Rules (SR), IOTA ADNEX model, Risk of Malignancy Index (RMI), and subjective assessment (SA) which is used for adnexal mass assessment in our institution. DESIGN: This is a prospective observational study. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: We included patients with at least one adnexal mass who needed elective surgical evaluation based on clinical and laboratory findings. Patients admitted to Clinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Clinical Center of Serbia, were recruited for the study between January 2019 and June 2021. Level II ultrasonographers performed a gray scale and Doppler exam for each patient. Preoperative classification of adnexal masses (benign or malignant) was performed by SA, the International Ovarian Analysis Group (IOTA) SR, IOTA ADNEX model, and Risk of Malignancy Index (RMI). Postoperatively obtained histological findings were used as a reference. RESULTS: During the study period, we enrolled 179 premenopausal and 217 postmenopausal patients, representing 396 patients in our sample. Prevalence of malignant disease in pre- and postmenopausal groups was 16.2% (29/179) and 41% (89/217), respectively. Malignant disease was diagnosed in 29.8% (118/396) of patients. SA achieved the highest discrimination accuracy between benign and malignant tumors (area under the curve [AUC] of 0.928, 95% CI [0.898-0.952]). For SA, the overall diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (LR+), and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) were 91.4%, 88.1%, 92.8%, 12.25, and 0.13. The AUC for Simple Rules with subjective assessment in inconclusive cases (SR + SA) was 0.912 (95% CI [0.880-0.938]). Regarding SR + SA, diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, LR+, and LR- were 92.4%, 88.1%, 94.2%, 15.31, and 0.13. The ADNEX model had the AUC of 0.914 (95% CI [0.882-0.940]). Binary classification using the ADNEX model at a cut-off value of 10% for malignancy had the sensitivity, specificity, LR+ and LR- of 92.4%, 73.0%, 3.42, and 0.10. This resulted in the lowest overall accuracy of 78.8%. The AUC for RMI was 0.854 (95% CI [0.815-0.887]), with overall accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, LR+ and LR- of 82.3%, 73.7%, 86.0%, 5.26, and 0.31. There was no difference in the AUCs of the SA and IOTA models for the whole group, premenopausal, and postmenopausal groups. RMI performed worse compared to SA and the IOTA models. The ADNEX model achieved the highest accuracy at the cut-off value of 35%. LIMITATIONS: The data generalizability is limited by a single institution-dependent sampling. CONCLUSIONS: The IOTA SR and ADNEX model were reliable and comparable with the SA and performed better than the RMI. The IOTA SR model offers the potential for immediate and reliable diagnosis, even in the hands of less experienced ultrasonographers. Both IOTA models studied can be a valuable adjunct to a clinician's decision-making process.

Oral Contraceptive Use and Assessment of Breast Cancer Risk among Premenopausal Women via Molecular Characteristics: Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

Breast cancer is divided into four molecular subtypes. Each one has distinct clinical features. The aim of this study was to assess individual breast cancer subtype risk in premenopausal women taking oral contraceptives (OCs). Databases (MEDLINE; PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library) were searched to January 2022 to identify case-control studies meeting the inclusion criteria. The influence of OCs intake on the risk of ER-positive breast cancer (ER+BC) was revealed to be non-significant with regard to reduction: OR = 0.9134, 95% CI: 0.8128 to 1.0265, p = 0.128. Assessment of ER-negative subtype breast cancer (ER-BC) risk indicated that OCs use significantly increased the risk: OR = 1.3079, 95% CI: 1.0003 to 1.7100, p = 0.050. Analysis for HER2-positive breast cancer (HER2+BC) risk showed that OCs use statistically non-significantly lowered the risk: OR = 0.8810, 95% CI: 0.5977 to 1.2984, p = 0.522. Meta-analysis with regard to Triplet-negative breast cancer (TNBC) risk showed non-statistically significant increased risk: OR = 1.553, 95% CI: 0.99 to 2.43, p = 0.055. The findings of the meta-analysis suggest that breast cancer risk in premenopausal women may vary with respect to molecular subtypes. Extensive scientific work is still necessary in order to understand the impact of OCs use on breast cancer risk in young women.

Evaluation of a Standardized Questionnaire for Initial Assessment of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding in Premenopausal Women.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of a standardized questionnaire for premenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) on clinical information collection and duration of consultation. METHODS: We conducted a before and after study involving 100 premenopausal women undergoing consultation for AUB. During stage 1, 50 consultations were recorded on a consultation sheet with no specific template. During stage 2, 50 women completed a 26-item auto-administered standardized questionnaire before the consultation, which was then reviewed with the consultant and added to the medical record. The duration of consultation was assessed in subgroups of 27 women in each stage. Two independent evaluators assessed the quality and completeness of data collected in the medical records using a score sheet developed by experts. Outcomes from both stages were compared using the t test. RESULTS: The descriptive characteristics were similar in both groups. The mean global scores of the quality and completeness of data collected improved significantly between stages 1 and 2, from 67% ± 12% to 95% ± 5% (P < 0.0001), as did medical background scores (54% ± 29% vs. 85% ± 13%; P < 0.0001) and AUB-related symptoms scores (69% ± 13% vs. 97% ± 5%; P < 0.0001). A mean reduction in duration of consultation of nearly 4 minutes was observed (24.6 ± 4.3 min vs. 20.7 ± 4.8 min; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The AUB-specific standardized questionnaire improves quality and completeness of data collected in medical records and reduces duration of consultation.

Understanding the barriers to, and facilitators of, ovarian toxicity assessment in breast cancer clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Detailed toxicity data are routinely collected in breast cancer (BC) clinical trials. However, ovarian toxicity is infrequently assessed, despite the adverse impacts on fertility and long-term health from treatment-induced ovarian insufficiency. OBJECTIVES: To determine the barriers to and facilitators of ovarian toxicity assessment in BC trials of anti-cancer drugs. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with purposively selected stakeholders from multiple countries involved in BC clinical trials (clinicians, consumers, pharmaceutical company representatives, members of drug-regulatory agencies). Participants were asked to describe the perceived benefits and barriers to evaluating ovarian toxicity. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, coded in NVivo software and analysed using inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Saturation of the main themes was reached and the final sample size included 25 participants from 14 countries (9 clinicians, 7 consumers, 5 members of regulatory agencies, 4 pharmaceutical company representatives); half were female. The main reported barrier to ovarian toxicity assessment was that the issue was rarely considered. Reasons included that these data are less important than survival data and are not required for regulatory approval. Overall, most participants believed evaluating the impact of BC treatments on ovarian function is valuable. Suggested strategies to increase ovarian toxicity assessment were to include it in clinical trial design guidelines and stakeholder advocacy. CONCLUSION: Lack of consideration about measuring ovarian toxicity in BC clinical trials that include premenopausal women suggest that guidelines and stronger advocacy from stakeholders, including regulators, would facilitate its more frequent inclusion in future trials, allowing women to make better informed treatment decisions.

Assessing the Burden of Illness Associated with Acquired Generalized Hypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder.

Background: Hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD), which affects ∼10% of women in the United States, is defined as the persistent or recurrent deficiency/absence of sexual desire accompanied by personal distress. Although HSDD impacts patient quality of life and interpersonal relationships, the disorder often goes unaddressed or untreated. Recent studies of the burden of illness in women with HSDD, especially premenopausal women, are limited. Materials and Methods: A 45-minute web-based survey was designed to investigate the experience of women seeking treatment for HSDD and the impact of this disorder on several psychosocial aspects of women's lives. Women were recruited from an online panel of patients who participated in research studies for compensation. Validated questionnaires assessed sexual function (Female Sexual Function Index) and health-related quality of life (12-Item Short Form Survey [SF-12]), including mental and physical component scores. Results: A total of 530 women, aged ≥18 years, diagnosed with acquired generalized HSDD were included in the study. Premenopausal women indicated greater overall HSDD symptom burden compared with postmenopausal women. Patients with HSDD reported lower SF-12 scores compared with the general population. A multivariable regression analysis demonstrated that psychosocial factors influencing the burden of HSDD, including interference with their relationship with their partner (ß = -0.18; p < 0.005), mental and emotional well-being (ß = -0.23; p < 0.005), and household and personal activities (ß = -0.23; p = 0.02), negatively affected SF-12 mental component scores. Conclusions: HSDD symptom burden was found to be negatively and statistically significantly associated with patients' mental health; the impact was greater among premenopausal women compared with postmenopausal women.

Combination of Endogenous Estradiol and Adipokine Leptin in Breast Cancer Risk and Prognosis Assessment in Postmenopausal Chinese Women.

Objective: Our study aims to clarify the role of estradiol and leptin in breast cancer risk and prognostic assessment in postmenopausal Chinese women. Design: The serum circulating estradiol and leptin level was detected by ELISA. Then the correlation between estradiol, leptin level, and clinical characteristics was analyzed using Fisher's exact test. Next, the Kaplan-Meier model was used to analyze the association between estradiol, leptin, and prognosis of postmenopausal breast cancer patients in our cohort and the TCGA dataset. Setting: The study was conducted at the National Cancer Center, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, and Peking Union Medical College. Patients: A total of 182 postmenopausal breast cancer patients and 111 healthy subjects from January 2010 to August 2010 were included in the analysis. Another 702 cases with breast cancer were retrieved from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database for subsequent analysis. Main Outcome Measure: Serum circulating estradiol and leptin level. Results: The level of estradiol was significantly higher (P<0.001) but the level of leptin had no significant difference (P = 0.764) in postmenopausal breast cancer patients compared with healthy subjects. The level of estradiol and leptin was not significantly different between estrogen receptor (ER) positive and ER-negative groups (P>0.05). Estradiol was significantly correlated with tumor T stage (P = 0.002) and leptin was significantly associated with perineural invasion (P = 0.014). In addition, the disease-free survival of patients with a high level of estradiol was significantly shorter (P = 0.025) but leptin tended to be a protective factor for overall survival in TCGA analysis (P = 0.038). Conclusion: Circulating estradiol and leptin played important roles in the risk of postmenopausal breast cancer even in low-estrogen nations with an independent expression of ER status. High circulating estradiol was a poor prognostic factor and leptin may be a protection signal in Chinese postmenopausal patients with breast cancer.

Eficacia y seguridad de ribociclib en combinación con un inhibidor de la aromatasa y un agonista de lhrh en pacientes premenopáusicas con cáncer de mama metastásico, rh positivo, her2 negativo, sin crisis visceral, y sin tratamiento sistémico previo para la enfermedad metastásica / Efficacy and safety of ribociclib in combination with an aromatase inhibitor and an lhrh agonist in premenopausal patients with rh-positive, her2-negative, metastatic breast cancer without visceral crisis, and without prior systemic treatment for metastatic disease

INTRODUCCIÓN: El presente dictamen preliminar expone la evaluación de la eficacia y seguridad de ribociclib en combinación con un IA y un agonista de LHRH en pacientes premenopáusicas con CMM, RH positivo, HER2 negativo, sin crisis visceral, y sin tratamiento sistémico previo para la enfermedad metastásica. El cáncer de mama es la primera causa de muerte por neoplasia maligna en mujeres en el mundo. En el 2019, en Perú se detectaron 4,743 casos nuevos de cáncer de mama en mujeres; y se registraron 1,840 muertes debido a esta neoplasia. Específicamente, el cáncer de mama metastásico (CMM) es una condición incurable. Se estima que la mediana de sobrevida global (SG) en pacientes con CMM es de aproximadamente tres años y que la tasa de SG hasta los 5 años es de aproximadamente 27 %. En ausencia de una enfermedad rápidamente progresiva o una crisis visceral, la terapia endocrina (TE) con supresión ovárica se considera el tratamiento de primera línea para las mujeres premenopáusicas, con CMM, receptor hormonal (RH) positivo, receptor 2 del factor de crecimiento epidérmico humano (HER2) negativo. Las opciones de TE comúnmente utilizadas incluyen moduladores selectivos del receptor de estrógeno (p. ej., tamoxifeno) e inhibidores de aromatasa (IA) no esteroideos (p. ej. anastrozol) o esteroideos (p. ej. exemestano). En EsSalud, este grupo de pacientes es tratado con TE (tamoxifeno, anastrazol, exemestano) más supresión ovárica. Sin embargo, el IETSI recibió una solicitud de evaluación de ribociclib en combinación con TE con IA más supresión ovárica, argumentándose la necesidad de evaluar terapias alternativas que proporcionen mejoras en la SG y calidad de vida de estos pacientes, y que a su vez tengan perfiles de seguridad favorables. METODOLOGÍA: Se realizó una búsqueda sistemática de literatura con el objetivo de identificar evidencia sobre la eficacia y seguridad de ribociclib en combinación con un IA y un agonista de LHRH en pacientes premenopáusicas con CMM, RH positivo, HER2 negativo, sin crisis visceral, y sin tratamiento sistémico previo para la enfermedad metastásica. Se utilizaron las bases de datos PubMed, Cochrane Library y LILACS. Asimismo, se realizó una búsqueda dentro de bases de datos pertenecientes a grupos que realizan evaluaciones de tecnologías sanitarias (ETS) y guías de práctica clínica (GPC), como el Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC), el National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), la Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH), la Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS), el Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG), el Instituto de Evaluación Tecnológica en Salud de Colombia (IETS), la Comissão Nacional de Incorporação de Tecnologias no Sistema Único de Saúde (CONITEC), entre otros; además de la Base Regional de Informes de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud de las Américas (BRISA) y páginas web de sociedades especializadas en el manejo del cáncer de mama como National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) y American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO). Se hizo una búsqueda adicional en la página web del registro de ensayos clínicos administrado por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina de los Estados Unidos (https://clinicaltrials.gov/) e International Clinical Trial Registry Platform (ICTRP) (https://apps.who.int/trialsearch/), para poder identificar ensayos clínicos en curso o cuyos resultados no hayan sido publicados para, de este modo, disminuir el riesgo de sesgo de publicación. RESULTADOS: se describe la evidencia disponible según el orden jerárquico del nivel de evidencia o pirámide de Haynes 6S3, siguiendo lo indicado en los criterios de elegibilidad. CONCLUSIONES: El objetivo del presente dictamen preliminar fue evaluar la mejor evidencia científica sobre la eficacia y seguridad de ribociclib en combinación con un IA y un agonista de LHRH en pacientes premenopáusicas con CMM, RH positivo, HER2 negativo, sin crisis visceral, y sin tratamiento sistémico previo para la enfermedad metastásica (primera línea de tratamiento para la enfermedad metastásica). El comparador de interés fue la TE con tamoxifeno o un IA (anastrazol, exemestano) más la supresión ovárica. Se incluyeron tres GPC elaboradas por la ESMO, la NCCN y la ASCO; tres ETS realizadas por la CADTH de Canadá, el IQWiG de Alemania y la CONETEC de Argentina; y tres publicaciones del estudio MONALEESA-7 (Tripathy et al. 2018; Im et al. 2019; Harbeck et al. 2020). Las tres GPC identificadas recomendaron el uso de un inhibidor de CDK 4/6, como ribociclib, combinado con un IA más supresión ovárica con un agonista de LHRH, en la población de interés. La NCCN y la ESMO también recomendaron el uso de TE (IA o tamoxifeno) más supresión ovárica en esta población. La evidencia utilizada para respaldar la recomendación fue el estudio MONALEESA-7. En cuanto a las recomendaciones de las ETS internacionales, el IQWiG y la CONETEC realizaron recomendaciones desfavorables para ribociclib, mientras que la CADTH elaboró una recomendación a favor del uso de ribociclib. Las recomendaciones se basaron en los resultados del estudio MONALEESA-7. En líneas generales, los resultados de MONALEESA-7 (ECA de fase 3, doble ciego) sugieren una mayor SG y SLP con ribociclib respecto al placebo en la población objetivo del presente dictamen. Además, el ribociclib se asoció con una mayor tasa de EA serios y severos, y una calidad de vida similar en relación con el placebo. Sobre la calidad de la evidencia, MONALESSA-7 presenta limitaciones metodológicas que amenazan la validez de los resultados reportados. En primer lugar, los resultados de eficacia se basaron en análisis de desenlaces basados en imágenes radiográficas, como la SLP (que no es una medida directa de beneficio clínico), y análisis interinos con datos prematuros de SG. Además, los análisis de calidad de vida presentaron una importante pérdida de información. Así se evidencia un alto grado de incertidumbre en relación al beneficio clínico de ribociclib. A ello se le suma la tasa significativa de EA severos y serios reportados con ribociclib en el corto plazo, y la incertidumbre sobre la certeza de los resultados de calidad de vida. Ribociclib es un medicamento que, de aprobarse, tendría un impacto presupuestario importante en el contexto de EsSalud, por lo que su alto costo tendría que traducirse en un claro beneficio clínico, el cual pueda justificar que se deje de invertir en tecnologías efectivas y menos costosas para los asegurados para que, en su lugar, se financie ribociclib. La población objetivo del presente dictamen tiene una alternativa de tratamiento disponible en EsSalud, que es la TE (tamoxifeno o un IA) con supresión ovárica, opción de tratamiento que sigue siendo recomendada en las GPC internacionales, y tiene una amplia experiencia de uso en la institución. Por todo lo expuesto, el IETSI no aprueba el uso de ribociclib en combinación con un IA y un agonista de LHRH en pacientes premenopáusicas con CMM, RH positivo, HER2 negativo, sin crisis visceral, y sin tratamiento sistémico previo para la enfermedad metastásica.

Uterine artery embolisation or myomectomy for women with uterine fibroids wishing to avoid hysterectomy: a cost-utility analysis of the FEMME trial.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the cost-effectiveness of uterine artery embolisation (UAE) and myomectomy for women with symptomatic uterine fibroids wishing to avoid hysterectomy. DESIGN: Economic evaluation alongside the FEMME randomised controlled trial. SETTING: 29 UK hospitals. POPULATION: Premenopausal women who had symptomatic uterine fibroids amenable to UAE or myomectomy wishing to avoid hysterectomy. 254 women were randomised to UAE (127) and myomectomy (127). METHODS: A within-trial cost-utility analysis was conducted from the perspective of the UK NHS. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) measured using the EuroQoL EQ-5D-3L, combined with costs to estimate cost-effectiveness over 2 and 4 years of follow-up. RESULTS: Over a 2-year time horizon, UAE was associated with higher mean costs (difference £645; 95% CI -1381 to 2580) and lower QALYs (difference -0.09; 95% CI -0.11 to -0.04) when compared with myomectomy. Similar results were observed over the 4-year time horizon. Thus, UAE was dominated by myomectomy. Results of the sensitivity analyses were consistent with the base case results for both years. Over 2 years, UAE was associated with higher costs (difference £456; 95% CI -1823 to 3164) and lower QALYs (difference -0.06; 95% CI -0.11 to -0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Myomectomy is a cost-effective option for the treatment of uterine fibroids. The differences in costs and QALYs are small. Women should be fully informed and have the option to choose between the two procedures. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Fully informed women with uterine fibroids should have a choice between uterine artery embolisation or myomectomy.

Assessment of Ovarian Function in Phase III (Neo)Adjuvant Breast Cancer Clinical Trials: A Systematic Evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Loss of ovarian function is a recognized adverse effect of chemotherapy for breast cancer and of great importance to patients. Little is known about the ovarian toxicity of newer cancer treatments. This study examined whether breast cancer clinical trials include assessment of the impact of trial interventions on ovarian function. METHODS: Eligible trials were phase III (neo)adjuvant trials of pharmacologic treatments for breast cancer, recruiting between June 2008 and October 2019, which included premenopausal women. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Clinicaltrials.gov, and EudraCT were searched. Data were extracted from trial publications, protocols, databases, and a survey sent to all trial chairs. Tests of statistical significance were 2-sided. RESULTS: Of 2354 records identified, 141 trials were eligible. Investigational treatments included chemotherapy (36.9%), HER2 targeted (24.8%), endocrine (12.8%), immunotherapy (7.8%), cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (5.0%), and poly-ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors (2.8%). Ovarian function was a prespecified endpoint in 13 (9.2%) trials. Forty-five (31.9%) trials collected ovarian function data, but only 33 (23.4%) collected posttrial-intervention data. Common postintervention data collected included menstruation (15.6%), pregnancy (13.5%), estradiol (9.9%), and follicle-stimulating hormone levels (8.5%). Only 4 (2.8%) trials collected postintervention anti-müllerian hormone levels, and 3 (2.1%) trials collected antral follicle count. Of 22 trials investigating immunotherapy, cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors, or poly-ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors, none specified ovarian function as an endpoint, but 4 (18.2%) collected postintervention ovarian function data. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of pharmacologic interventions on ovarian function is infrequently assessed in phase III breast cancer (neo)adjuvant trials that include premenopausal women. Trialists should consider inclusion of ovarian function endpoints when designing clinical trials, given its importance for informed decision making.

First-line Treatment with Ribociclib plus Endocrine Therapy for Premenopausal Women with Hormone-receptor-positive Advanced Breast Cancer: A Cost-effectiveness Analysis.

BACKGROUND: We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis incorporating recent phase III clinical trial (MONALEESA-7) data to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of ribociclib (RIB) as a first-line treatment for premenopausal women with hormone receptor (HR)-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced breast cancer (ABC) from the United States healthcare payer perspective. In addition, because RIB has not been marketed in China, we identified the range of drug costs for which RIB could be considered cost effective from a Chinese healthcare system perspective. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A Markov model was developed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of adding RIB to endocrine therapy over a lifetime. The clinical outcomes and utility data were obtained from published literature. Costs data were obtained from United States and Chinese official websites, and we determined the potential price for RIB in China based on its price in the United States. The main outcomes of this study were the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). RESULTS: The model projected that mean outcome was better with RIB and endocrine combined (3.83366 QALYs) than with endocrine therapy alone (2.71203 QALYs). In the United States, RIB and endocrine therapy cost an additional $604,960.06, resulting in an ICER of $539,357.95/QALY compared with endocrine monotherapy. Subgroup analyses indicated that, in China, the projected mean outcomes were better for RIB and endocrine therapy (6.37 QALYs) than for endocrine monotherapy (2.71 QALYs). The corresponding incremental costs were $224,731.88943. Thus, the ICER comparing RIB and endocrine therapy with endocrine therapy alone represented a $61,454.96/QALY gain. CONCLUSION: Additional use of RIB is estimated to not be cost effective as a first-line treatment for premenopausal women with HR-positive, HER2-negative ABC in the United States. A value-based price for the cost of RIB is less than $31.74/200 mg for China.

Cost-effectiveness of ribociclib as initial treatment for premenopausal women with advanced breast cancer in Singapore.

BACKGROUND: CDK4/6 inhibitors have shown promising results for treating advanced breast cancer (ABC) and are routinely used in Singapore. In view of their high costs, it is important to assess their relative value compared to existing standards of care in the local setting. AIMS: This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of adding ribociclib to goserelin and a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor or tamoxifen as initial therapy for premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) ABC in Singapore. METHODS: A partitioned survival model with four health states (progression-free on first-line treatment, progression-free on second-line treatment, progressed disease, and death) was developed from a healthcare system perspective over a 10-year time horizon. Key clinical inputs were derived from the MONALEESA-7 trial, and survival curves were extrapolated beyond the trial period. Health state utilities were derived from the literature and direct medical costs were obtained from local public healthcare institutions. A discount rate of 3% was applied to both costs and outcomes. One-way deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to explore uncertainties. RESULTS: The base-case analysis resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of SGD197, 667 per quality-adjusted life-year. Sensitivity analyses showed that the ICER was sensitive to the survival parametric distribution, ribociclib price, time horizon, and utility weights used. Even when these were varied, ICERs remained high and not cost-effective in the local context. CONCLUSION: At its current price, adding ribociclib to endocrine therapy is unlikely to be cost-effective in Singapore for HR+, HER2- ABC. Results from this study are useful to inform future funding decisions for CDK4/6 inhibitors alongside other factors including clinical effectiveness, safety, and budget impact considerations.

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Ovarian Suppression in Premenopausal Women: No Change in Free-Living Energy Expenditure.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether suppression of ovarian function (gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist [GnRHAG ]) for 24 weeks in premenopausal women approaching menopause causes changes in body composition and a decline in free-living physical activity energy expenditure (PAEE) and whether endurance exercise training attenuates the changes. METHODS: Premenopausal women who were approaching menopause (mean [SD]: age 46 [3] years, BMI 26.3 [4.8] kg/m2 ) were randomized to 24 weeks of GnRHAG (n = 14), GnRHAG + Exercise (n = 11), or placebo (n = 9). Endurance exercise was performed 4 days per week with the goal of expending 200 to 300 kcal per session. Primary outcome measurements included body composition by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, total daily energy expenditure (TDEE), and PAEE by doubly labeled water, and resting energy expenditure (REE) by indirect calorimetry. RESULTS: Changes in TDEE, PAEE, REE, or body composition were not different between groups. However, within the GnRHAG group, fat mass increased (mean [SE]: total 1.7 [0.4] kg, trunk 0.9 [0.2] kg, leg 0.6 [0.2] kg) and fat-free leg mass decreased (mean [SE]: -0.4 [0.2] kg) significantly. CONCLUSIONS: In premenopausal women approaching menopause, ovarian hormone suppression resulted in increased adiposity without alterations in TDEE, PAEE, or REE.

Assessment of Clinical Drug-Drug Interactions of Elagolix, a Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptor Antagonist.

Elagolix is an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor antagonist indicated for the management of endometriosis-associated pain and in combination with estradiol/norethindrone acetate indicated for the management of heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine leiomyomas (fibroids) in premenopausal women. Elagolix coadministered with estradiol/norethindrone acetate is in late-stage development for the management of heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine fibroids. Based on the in vitro profile of elagolix metabolism and disposition, 9 drug-drug interaction (DDI) studies evaluating the victim and perpetrator characteristics of elagolix were conducted in 144 healthy volunteers. As a victim of cytochrome P450 (CYPs) and transporter-mediated DDIs, elagolix area under the curve (AUC) increased by ∼2-fold following coadministration with ketoconazole and by ∼5- and ∼2-fold with single and multiple doses of rifampin, respectively. As a perpetrator, elagolix decreased midazolam AUC (90% confidence interval) by 54% (50%-59%) and increased digoxin AUC by 32% (23%-41%). Elagolix decreased rosuvastatin AUC by 40% (29%-50%). No clinically significant changes in exposure on coadministration with sertraline or fluconazole occurred. A elagolix 150-mg once-daily regimen should be limited to 6 months with strong CYP3A inhibitors and rifampin because of the potential increase in bone mineral density loss, as described in the drug label. A 200-mg twice-daily regimen is recommended for no more than 1 month with strong CYP3A inhibitors and not recommended with rifampin. Elagolix is contraindicated with strong organic anion transporter polypeptide B1 inhibitors (eg, cyclosporine and gemfibrozil). Consider increasing the doses of midazolam and rosuvastatin when coadministered with elagolix, and individualize therapy based on patient response. Clinical monitoring is recommended for P-glycoprotein substrates with a narrow therapeutic window (eg, digoxin). Dose adjustments are not required for sertraline, fluconazole, bupropion (or any CYP2B6 substrate), or elagolix when coadministered.

Concomitant Bilateral Salpingo-Oophorectomy at Hysterectomy: Differences by Race and Menopausal Status in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System, 2007-2014.

Background: Hysterectomy can be performed with concomitant bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) to treat symptomatic pathology of the ovary (e.g., endometriosis) or to prevent ovarian cancer. Our objective was to examine the relationship between race and concomitant BSO by menopausal status in the Veterans Affairs (VA) health care system. Methods: This is a longitudinal study utilizing VA administrative data to identify hysterectomies provided or paid for by VA (i.e., source of care) between 2007 and 2014. We defined BSO as removal of both ovaries and fallopian tubes at the time of hysterectomy, identified by International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Revision codes. Covariates included demographic (e.g., ethnicity) and gynecological diagnoses (e.g., endometriosis). We used generalized linear models with a log-link and binomial distribution to estimate associations of race with BSO by menopausal status and source of care. Results: We identified 6,785 Veterans with hysterectomies, including 2,320 with concomitant BSO. Overall, Black Veterans were more likely to be single, obese, and undergo abdominal hysterectomy. After adjustment, premenopausal Black Veterans had a 41% lower odds of BSO than their White counterparts (odds ratio [OR]: 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.51-0.68). Stratifying on source of care, these results remained unchanged (provided: OR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.52-0.72; paid: OR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.48-0.71). There was insufficient evidence of an association among postmenopausal Veterans. Conclusions: Premenopausal Black Veterans are less likely to undergo BSO even after adjustment for salient characteristics. Our findings may have implications for equitable gynecological care for Veterans. Additional research is needed to better understand the role of differential preferences or cancer risk in these racial differences.

Management of early breast cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil.

PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted early breast cancer (EBC) treatment worldwide. This study analyzed how Brazilian breast specialists are managing EBC. METHODS: An electronic survey was conducted with members of the Brazilian Society of Breast Cancer Specialists (SBM) between April 30 and May 11, 2020. Bivariate analysis was used to describe changes in how specialists managed EBC at the beginning and during the pandemic, according to breast cancer subtype and oncoplastic surgery. RESULTS: The response rate was 34.4% (503/1462 specialists). Most of the respondents (324; 64.4%) lived in a state capital city, were board-certified as breast specialists (395; 78.5%) and either worked in an academic institute or one associated with breast cancer treatment (390; 77.5%). The best response rate was from the southeast of the country (240; 47.7%) followed by the northeast (128; 25.4%). At the beginning of the pandemic, 43% changed their management approach. As the outbreak progressed, this proportion increased to 69.8% (p < 0.001). The southeast of the country (p = 0.005) and the state capital cities (p < 0.001) were associated with changes at the beginning of the pandemic, while being female (p = 0.001) was associated with changes during the pandemic. For hormone receptor-positive tumors with the best prognosis (Ki-67 < 20%), 47.9% and 17.7% of specialists would recommend neoadjuvant endocrine therapy for postmenopausal and premenopausal women, respectively. For tumors with poorer prognosis (Ki-67 > 30%), 34% and 10.9% would recommend it for postmenopausal and premenopausal women, respectively. Menopausal status significantly affected whether the specialists changed their approach (p < 0.00001). For tumors ≥ 1.0 cm, 42.9% of respondents would recommend neoadjuvant systemic therapy for triple-negative tumors and 39.6% for HER2 + tumors. Overall, 63.4% would recommend immediate total breast reconstruction, while only 3.4% would recommend autologous reconstruction. In breast-conserving surgery, 75% would recommend partial breast reconstruction; however, 54.1% would contraindicate mammoplasty. Furthermore, 84.9% of respondents would not recommend prophylactic mastectomy in cases of BRCA mutation. CONCLUSIONS: Important changes occurred in EBC treatment, particularly for hormone receptor-positive tumors, as the outbreak progressed in each region. Systematic monitoring could assure appropriate breast cancer treatment, mitigating the impact of the pandemic.

Sex and Region-Specific Associations of Bone Mineral Content, Muscle Mass, and Fat Mass with Insulin Resistance.

Background: To compare the strengths of the associations between total and region-specific body composition and insulin resistance (IR) considering sex and menopausal status and to compare body composition indicators for discriminating high IR. Materials and Methods: Among 5380 men, 3652 premenopausal women, and 3207 postmenopausal women in the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, high IR was defined as the sex-specific highest quintiles of homeostasis model assessment IR and metabolic syndrome. Percentages of bone mineral content (BMC%), muscle mass (MM%), and fat mass (FM%) were measured for the whole body, trunk, and upper/lower extremities by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Results: After adjusting for body mass, age, education, smoking status, alcohol use, and physical activity, one-standard deviation increases in whole-body FM%, MM%, and BMC% were associated with 50%-63%, 19%-26%, and 14%-22% higher odds of high IR in men and pre- and postmenopausal women, 31%-36%, 12%-17%, and 10%-15% lower odds, and 27%-36%, 31%-40%, and 19%-23% lower odds, respectively. Those associations for FM% in men and BMC% in premenopausal women tended to be stronger in the upper body than in lower extremities. In receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, FM% in men and BMC% in women had superior discriminatory abilities for high IR. Conclusions: IR may have a stronger association with FM% in men and BMC% in premenopausal women in upper body, while the association strength in postmenopausal women may be similar across body composition. These findings reveal differences in the strengths of region-, sex, and menopausal status-specific relationships between body composition and IR.