A traditional hip implant is as effective as newer types for people over 65.

The studyFawsitt C, Thom H, Hunt L. Choice of prosthetic implant combinations in total hip replacement: cost-effectiveness analysis using UK and Swedish hip joint registries data. Value Health 2019;22:303-12.This study was funded by the NIHR Research for Patient Benefit Programme (project number PB-PG-0613-31032).To read the full NIHR Signal, go to https://discover.dc.nihr.ac.uk/content/signal-000771/a-traditional-hip-implant-is-as-effective-as-more-expensive-newer-types-for-older-people.

[Are Higher Prices for Larger Femoral Heads in Total Hip Arthroplasty Justified from the Perspective of Health Care Economics? An Analysis of Costs and Effects in Germany]. / Sind höhere Preise für größere Kopfdurchmesser in der Hüftendoprothetik medizinökonomisch vertretbar? Eine Analyse der Kosten und Effekte in Deutschland.

Background: In total hip arthroplasty (THA), femoral head diameter has not been regarded as a key parameter which should be restored when reconstructing joint biomechanics and geometry. Apart from the controversial discussion on the advantages and disadvantages of using larger diameter heads, their higher cost is another important reason that they have only been used to a limited extent. The goal of this study was to analyse the price structure of prosthetic heads in comparison to other components used in THA. A large group of patients with hip endoprostheses were evaluated with respect to the implanted socket diameter and thus the theoretically attainable head diameter. Materials and Methods: The relative prices of various THA components (cups, inserts, stems and ball heads) distributed by two leading German manufacturers were determined and analysed. Special attention was paid to different sizes and varieties in a series of components. A large patient population treated with THA was evaluated with respect to the implanted cup diameter and therefore the theoretically attainable head diameter. Results: The pricing analysis of the THA components of two manufacturers showed identical prices for cups, inserts and stems in a series. In contrast to this, the prices for prosthetic heads with a diameter of 36-44 mm were 11-50 % higher than for 28 mm heads. Identical prices for larger heads were the exception. The distribution of the head diameter in 2719 THA cases showed significant differences between the actually implanted and the theoretically attainable heads. Conclusion: There are proven advantages in using larger diameter ball heads in THA and the remaining problems can be solved. It is therefore desirable to correct the current pricing practice of charging higher prices for larger components. Instead, identical prices should be charged for all head diameters in a series, as is currently established practice for all other THA components. Thus when reconstructing biomechanics and joint geometry in THA, it should be possible to recover not only leg length, femoral offset and antetorsion of the femoral neck, but also to approximately restore the diameter of the femoral head and thereby optimise the functional outcome.

[Differences between short stem prostheses]. / Unterschiede zwischen verschiedenen Kurzschaftendoprothesen.

The short stem designs currently available are significantly different and can be differentiated into neck containing, partial containing and neck resection designs. In this article, the differences in the design features are presented. These include the differences in the technique of implantation, the significant differences in the reproducibility of the given anatomy of the patient and also concerning their osteologic competence.

Evaluation of total hip arthroplasty devices using a total joint replacement registry.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this paper is to describe the infrastructure of the total joint replacement registry of a large integrated healthcare system's and emphasize challenges associated with orthopedic device classification and evaluation. METHODS: Using a large integrated healthcare system innovative infrastructure including electronic health record data, administrative data sources, and registry data collection, we evaluated device choice and outcomes of total hip arthroplasty (THA). Devices were classified into type of bearing surface (alternative versus traditional). Multiple imputation was used to accommodate missing data, and a logistic regression model was applied to assess the impact of patient and surgeon factors on choice of bearing surface. A Cox regression model was used to evaluate risk of aseptic revision while controlling for surgeon, site, and patient characteristics. Adjusted cumulative probability-of-event curves were created, comparing survival of alternative against traditional bearings of devices, with aseptic revision as the outcome of interest. RESULTS: The study sample consisted of 25,377 primary THAs with an average follow-up of 2.7 years. Choice of bearing surface varied by surgeon and patient characteristics. After adjusting for patient, surgeon, and hospital covariates, results showed that the risk of aseptic revision associated with alternative bearings did not differ significantly from traditional bearing surfaces (hazard ratio = 1.33; 95% confidence interval: 0.90, 1.98). CONCLUSIONS: Clinically rich data from a registry with linkages to electronic health records and other administrative databases improve identification of exposures, outcomes, and patient subgroups in medical device evaluation. These various data sources facilitate refined adjustment for potential confounders such as hospital, surgeon, and patient factors and ensure comprehensive device performance evaluation within registries.

[Comparison of different cup revision systems]. / Unterschiedliche Pfannenrevisionsimplantate im Vergleich.

Aseptic loosening of hip cups results in cranial and medial migration, which induces bone resorption and defects. Despite these defects, it is the aim in cup revision arthroplasty to get a stable fixation and a restoration of the hip center. Depending on the size of the defect, which can be classified by different scoring systems, various strategies requiring an experienced surgeon can be used to reach this aim. If defects are localized, bigger primary cemented or cement-free cups can be used. Larger defects may need bone transplantation or special designs such as oval cups or reinforcement rings. They can be used with or without plates in combination with cement for inlay fixation. In the case of bigger defects or pelvic discontinuity, modular systems or a socket cup may be necessary.

[Total hip replacement in the G-DRG-system]. / Hüftgelenks-Endoprothetik im DRG-System.

AIM: Due to the continuing increase in life expectancy, the ageing process of the German population in general and the high demands placed on activity levels and quality of life today, the demand for primary and secondary joint replacement surgery continues to increase. To distribute the economic and medical resources properly, while still making technical and surgical innovations available to a broad public, hospitals must be able to adequately finance these procedures with the help of the proper diagnosis related groups. METHOD: The development of the German DRG-system over the past years, as well as the new calculation for the year 2006 are to be reviewed and analysed in this article with this in mind. RESULTS: An improvement in the degree of differentiation between the individual procedures can be documented. CONCLUSION: Whether or not these changes will ensure the long-term financial survival of the German health care system will remain to be seen.

The economic impact of failures in total hip replacement surgery: 28,997 cases from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, 1987-1993.

The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register was established in 1987. Until January 1994, approximately 200 different implant combinations had been used in total hip replacements (THR) in Norway. About 5,500 THR were performed each year in this period with a total cost of 70 million USD per year. We analyzed the economic consequences related to the use of some inferior primary hip arthroplasties in this period. As the reference arthroplasty, we chose the most commonly used prosthesis in Norway, i.e., the Charnley prosthesis fixed with high viscosity cement containing antibiotic and with systemic antibiotic prophylaxis (n 4,970). We compared this reference group to all other primary THR registered in the same time period (n 24,027), and to the following sub-groups of primary THR: 1) uncemented Ti-Fit/ Bio-Fit (acetabulum/femur) combination (n 173), 2) uncemented Coxa/Femora combination (n 153), 3) THR with low-viscosity cement (n 1,807) and 4) THR with Boneloc cement (n 1,250). We estimated the number of additional revisions compared to the reference arthroplasty after a follow-up of 3-5 years in the different groups, with adjustment for age, sex and diagnosis. The direct extra revision costs were calculated. Compared to the reference arthroplasty, the group of all other primary THR gave an extra revision cost estimated at about 1.7 million USD per year. About 1,000 uncemented Bio-Fit femoral prostheses have been applied in Norway, including those implanted before the registration started (1985-1987). The extra revision costs the first postoperative years for these 1,000 prostheses amount to about 0.7 million USD per year. Corresponding figures in the Coxa/ Femora group were 0.08 million USD, in the group with low-viscosity cement, 0.3 million USD and in the Boneloc group, 0.4 million USD per year.

Prostheses for primary total hip replacement. A critical appraisal of the literature.

Eighty-one published papers on the performance of prostheses in total hip replacement were appraised. Sound methodology was demonstrated in 1 of 8 randomized controlled trials and 4 of 17 nonrandomized comparative studies. Of 56 case series without controls, 32 met the appraisal criteria, but these are intrinsically less useful. The published literature does not provide solid evidence for the superiority of cement-free or hybrid prostheses over modern cemented types.

Use and abuse of performance indicators.

An audit was performed by this department after allegations by the regional health authority of low productivity. It was found that the health authority had underestimated the number of operations performed in 1983 by only 5%, but an inexact classification and grading of operations had led to errors in the performance indicators of 19.8% for the "weighted number of operations" and 34.5% for the "number of major operations per consultant." When the throughput of orthopaedic departments in districts was compared by the regional health authority it was found that such errors in performance indicators had been further compounded by the inconsistent use of population data and incorrect data on medical staffing. Medical practitioners and the health authorities are alerted to this amplification of inaccurate data. Other methods for assessing trauma and orthopaedic surgery are proposed, such as a simplification of the Office of Population Censuses and Surveys classification of surgical operations, grading operations based on time spent in the operating theatre, and provision of computer programs to code for diagnosis and operation when writing discharge summaries.