Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 38
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Infez Med ; 28(1): 17-28, 2020 Mar 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32172257

RESUMO

The HIV epidemic has not yet ended, and there are ever more challenges: the recent Italian National Plan of Interventions against HIV and AIDS (Piano Nazionale di Interventi Contro HIV e AIDS (PNAIDS) 2017-2019) was hailed for its comprehensiveness. Its likelihood of success across the HIV care continuum was therefore assessed. Awareness interventions are sporadic and continue to miss high risk populations; if effectively implemented, the prescriptive detail in PNAIDS may help address this. Combined prevention needs greater focus and investment. However, there has been recent progress: free anonymous testing is available at multiple settings although improvements to provide access to key vulnerable populations are needed. Clinical management is available to a high standard across the country, with some areas for improvement in ensuring equality of access. Long-term management of people living with HIV is often effective, but discrepancies exist across regions and settings of care. It is recommended to enable implementation of PNAIDS as a matter of urgency, develop integrated awareness and testing interventions for STIs and HIV, make condoms free for high-risk populations, and develop a network of multidisciplinary services for long-term holistic care of people living with HIV.


Assuntos
Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Política de Saúde , Programas Nacionais de Saúde , Síndrome da Imunodeficiência Adquirida/prevenção & controle , Testes Anônimos/legislação & jurisprudência , Antirretrovirais/uso terapêutico , Preservativos/provisão & distribuição , Diagnóstico Tardio/estatística & dados numéricos , Usuários de Drogas/legislação & jurisprudência , Infecções por HIV/diagnóstico , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Sobreviventes de Longo Prazo ao HIV , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Transição Epidemiológica , Saúde Holística , Hospitais Especializados , Humanos , Itália/epidemiologia , Assistência de Longa Duração/métodos , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Preconceito/legislação & jurisprudência , Trabalho Sexual/legislação & jurisprudência , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/diagnóstico , Estereotipagem , Populações Vulneráveis
3.
Annu Rev Public Health ; 41: 37-62, 2020 04 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31765272

RESUMO

Racism. Sexism. Heterosexism. Gender binarism. Together, they comprise intimately harmful, distinct, and entangled societal systems of self-serving domination and privilege that structure the embodiment of health inequities. Guided by the ecosocial theory of disease distribution, I synthesize key features of the specified "isms" and provide a measurement schema, informed by research from both the Global North and the Global South. Metrics discussed include (a) structural, including explicit rules and laws, nonexplicit rules and laws, and area-based or institutional nonrule measures; and (b) individual-level (exposures and internalized) measures, including explicit self-report, implicit, and experimental. Recommendations include (a) expanding the use of structural measures to extend beyond the current primary emphasis on psychosocial individual-level measures; (b) analyzing exposure in relation to both life course and historical generation; (c) developing measures of anti-isms; and (d) developing terrestrially grounded measures that can reveal links between the structural drivers of unjust isms and their toll on environmental degradation, climate change, and health inequities.


Assuntos
Equidade em Saúde/organização & administração , Preconceito/legislação & jurisprudência , Preconceito/psicologia , Pesquisa/organização & administração , Meio Ambiente , Identidade de Gênero , Equidade em Saúde/normas , Humanos , Racismo , Pesquisa/normas , Sexismo/psicologia
4.
AMA J Ethics ; 21(6): E521-529, 2019 06 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31204993

RESUMO

Patient bias towards clinicians and employees in health care is common, but policy to address bias and to support staff is relatively limited. Creating a framework to address bias incidents is critical for cultivating environments that are safe for employees and patients. Mayo Clinic has created both policy to support staff and a reporting mechanism for accountability. Education, resources, and training are available and being disseminated to teach employees ways to respond to bias incidents.


Assuntos
Guias como Assunto , Assédio não Sexual/legislação & jurisprudência , Política Organizacional , Assistência ao Paciente/ética , Preferência do Paciente/legislação & jurisprudência , Preconceito/legislação & jurisprudência , Gestão de Riscos/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos
5.
Am J Hum Genet ; 104(1): 6-7, 2019 01 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30609408

RESUMO

Protections against genetic discrimination advance genetics research and the clinical use of genetics, as well as ensure the ethical use of genetic data. Ten years after the passage of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA), the American Society of Human Genetics remains a staunch advocate for GINA's strong implementation and for other laws that enhance protections for the public.


Assuntos
Genética Médica/ética , Genética Médica/legislação & jurisprudência , Saúde , Preconceito/legislação & jurisprudência , Preconceito/prevenção & controle , Justiça Social/legislação & jurisprudência , Privacidade Genética/ética , Privacidade Genética/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Preconceito/ética
7.
Am Univ Law Rev ; 67(6): 1797-909, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30203944

RESUMO

This Article addresses the impact of school voucher programs on students with disabilities. We show that for children with disabilities, the price of admission into so-called "school choice" programs is so high that it is effectively no real choice at all. School voucher programs require students with disabilities to sign away their robust federal rights and protections in the public school system. Under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA)--the preeminent legislative safeguard for students with disabilities--these rights include the right to a "free and appropriate public education" delivered through an "individualized education plan." By giving up these protections, children with disabilities are left at the mercy of private schools that have no legal obligation to provide them with an appropriate education, and, in the vast majority of cases, are not legally prohibited from discriminating against them on the basis of their disability. We argue that school voucher programs--including a proposed federal voucher program--put the education of students with disabilities back decades, and likely constitute a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution.


Assuntos
Crianças com Deficiência/educação , Crianças com Deficiência/legislação & jurisprudência , Educação Inclusiva/legislação & jurisprudência , Educação/legislação & jurisprudência , Instituições Acadêmicas/legislação & jurisprudência , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Comportamento de Escolha , Direitos Civis/educação , Direitos Civis/legislação & jurisprudência , Educação/economia , Educação Inclusiva/história , História do Século XX , Humanos , Indiana , Preconceito/legislação & jurisprudência , Setor Privado , Setor Público , Decisões da Suprema Corte , Estados Unidos
8.
Soc Sci Med ; 196: 158-165, 2018 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29190536

RESUMO

How social and legal climate influence LGB health is an under-studied topic. In response, this study examines whether the lesbian/gay/bisexual (LGB) climate index and presence of anti-discrimination law show population health significance for U.S. sexual minorities. The LGB climate index uses survey data collected between 2012 and 2013 to gauge states' support of lesbian, gay, and bisexual individuals, whereas anti-discrimination law captures any state-level law that makes it illegal to discriminate because of sexual orientation in employment, housing, and public accommodations. We merge these two contextual measures with 2011-2015 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) aggregated, individual-level survey data, from which we generate three measures of state-level rates: excellent self-rated health, routine health care utilization, and health insurance among self-identified lesbian/gay and bisexual adults. We find that the LGB climate index associates positively with rates of excellent self-rated health, routine health care utilization, and health insurance-but only for states with anti-discrimination laws, and only among lesbian/gay adults. Analyses confirm salubrious synergism between a sexually-minority-friendly climate and anti-discrimination law-together these two contextual measures interact to protect lesbian/gay population health.


Assuntos
Saúde das Minorias/estatística & dados numéricos , Preconceito/legislação & jurisprudência , Minorias Sexuais e de Gênero/estatística & dados numéricos , Meio Social , Adulto , Sistema de Vigilância de Fator de Risco Comportamental , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos
9.
J Oncol Pract ; 13(6): e543-e551, 2017 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28418762

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To determine whether the Amendments to the hallmark Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA; effective January 2009), which provide increased access to the antidiscrimination laws for many with chronic illness, are related to changes in workplace discrimination allegations in individuals with a history of cancer. METHODS: Information collected by the Equal Employment Opportunities Commission was used to compare allegations of discrimination and their merit before (2001 to 2008) and after (2009 to 2011) implementation of the Amendments Act. RESULTS: Allegations related to terms of employment (eg, promotions, wages) were more likely to be filed (odds ratio [OR], 1.34; 95% CI, 1.11 to 1.61) and determined to have merit (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.77) after implementation of the Amendments Act. Allegations related to workplace relations (eg, harassment, discipline, discharge) were also more likely to be filed post Amendments Act (OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.23 to 1.78), although the merit of this complaint remained stable. Filing of all other allegations of discrimination (ie, hiring, reasonable accommodation, and termination) and their merit remained unchanged post Amendments Act. CONCLUSION: Despite the implementation of the Amendments Act, discrimination allegations in those with a history of cancer persisted or in certain areas increased. Although prevention of workplace discrimination rests primarily with employers, the oncology care team is uniquely qualified to provide information related to residual symptoms and function that can facilitate more personalized solutions to workplace discrimination, such as successful workplace accommodations. Information is provided that can assist the oncology team in their efforts to improve work outcomes.


Assuntos
Direitos Civis/legislação & jurisprudência , Pessoas com Deficiência/legislação & jurisprudência , Emprego/legislação & jurisprudência , Local de Trabalho/legislação & jurisprudência , Sobreviventes de Câncer/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Oncologia/legislação & jurisprudência , Oncologia/métodos , Preconceito/legislação & jurisprudência , Preconceito/prevenção & controle , Justiça Social/legislação & jurisprudência , Estados Unidos
11.
Int Rev Psychiatry ; 28(4): 411-4, 2016 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27472557

RESUMO

Discrimination is a major public health issue. Discrimination is known and well recognized to be associated with poor physical and mental health, as well as creating social divisions and fear that undermines the success of society and economic progress. Policies to eradicate discrimination and prejudice in the public sphere, and in public life, need thoughtful and careful planning and engagement by all public institutions and in the way they conduct their business. This forms the basis of social justice. Employers, politicians, and public servants, as well as other stakeholders, irrespective of their professional status, all have ethical responsibilities to uphold such actions and policies, values, and supporting behaviours, as a core principle of successful societies.


Assuntos
Saúde Mental/legislação & jurisprudência , Pessoas Mentalmente Doentes/legislação & jurisprudência , Preconceito/legislação & jurisprudência , Saúde Pública/legislação & jurisprudência , Justiça Social/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos
13.
West J Emerg Med ; 17(3): 245-51, 2016 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27330654

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) of 1986 was enacted to prevent hospitals from "dumping" or refusing service to patients for financial reasons. The statute prohibits discrimination of emergency department (ED) patients for any reason. The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) of the Department of Health and Human Services enforces the statute. The objective of this study is to determine the scope, cost, frequency and most common allegations leading to monetary settlement against hospitals and physicians for patient dumping. METHODS: Review of OIG investigation archives in May 2015, including cases settled from 2002-2015 ( https://oig.hhs.gov/fraud/enforcement/cmp/patient_dumping.asp ). RESULTS: There were 192 settlements (14 per year average for 4000+ hospitals in the USA). Fines against hospitals and physicians totaled $6,357,000 (averages $33,435 and $25,625 respectively); 184/192 (95.8%, $6,152,000) settlements were against hospitals and eight against physicians ($205,000). Most common settlements were for failing to screen 144/192 (75%) and stabilize 82/192 (42.7%) for emergency medical conditions (EMC). There were 22 (11.5%) cases of inappropriate transfer and 22 (11.5%) more where the hospital failed to transfer. Hospitals failed to accept an appropriate transfer in 25 (13.0%) cases. Patients were turned away from hospitals for insurance/financial status in 30 (15.6%) cases. There were 13 (6.8%) violations for patients in active labor. In 12 (6.3%) cases, the on-call physician refused to see the patient, and in 28 (14.6%) cases the patient was inappropriately discharged. Although loss of Medicare/Medicaid funding is an additional possible penalty, there were no disclosures of exclusion of hospitals from federal funding. There were 6,035 CMS investigations during this time period, with 2,436 found to have merit as EMTALA violations (40.4%). However, only 192/6,035 (3.2%) actually resulted in OIG settlements. The proportion of CMS-certified EMTALA violations that resulted in OIG settlements was 7.9% (192/2,436). CONCLUSION: Of 192 hospital and physician settlements with the OIG from 2002-15, most were for failing to provide screening (75%) and stabilization (42%) to patients with EMCs. The reason for patient "dumping" was due to insurance or financial status in 15.6% of settlements. The vast majority of penalties were to hospitals (95% of cases and 97% of payments). Forty percent of investigations found EMTALA violations, but only 3% of investigations triggered fines.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/legislação & jurisprudência , Preconceito/legislação & jurisprudência , Preconceito/estatística & dados numéricos , Recusa em Tratar/legislação & jurisprudência , Fatores Etários , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/organização & administração , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro , Responsabilidade Legal , Programas de Assistência Gerenciada/legislação & jurisprudência , Transferência de Pacientes/legislação & jurisprudência , Preconceito/prevenção & controle , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , United States Dept. of Health and Human Services
15.
Perspect Biol Med ; 58(3): 252-66, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27157343

RESUMO

This article provides an overview of the relevance and import of the U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) to child health practice and pediatric bioethics. We discuss the four general principles of the CRC that apply to the implementation of all rights contained in the document, the right to health articulated in Article 24, and the important position ascribed to parents in fulfilling the rights of their children. We then examine how the CRC is implemented and monitored in law and practice. The CRC and associated principles of child rights provide strategies for rights-based approaches to clinical practice and health systems, as well as to policy design, professional training, and health services research. In light of the relevance of the CRC and principles of child rights to children's health and child health practice, it follows that there is an intersection between child rights and pediatric bioethics. Pediatric bioethicists and child rights advocates should work together to define this intersection in all domains of pediatric practice.


Assuntos
Bioética , Serviços de Saúde da Criança/ética , Direitos Humanos , Nações Unidas , Temas Bioéticos , Criança , Serviços de Saúde da Criança/legislação & jurisprudência , Proteção da Criança/ética , Proteção da Criança/legislação & jurisprudência , Política de Saúde , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Pais , Preconceito/ética , Preconceito/legislação & jurisprudência , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde , Valor da Vida
16.
Fed Regist ; 81(96): 31375-473, 2016 May 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27192742

RESUMO

This final rule implements Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) (Section 1557). Section 1557 prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, age, or disability in certain health programs and activities. The final rule clarifies and codifies existing nondiscrimination requirements and sets forth new standards to implement Section 1557, particularly with respect to the prohibition of discrimination on the basis of sex in health programs other than those provided by educational institutions and the prohibition of various forms of discrimination in health programs administered by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS or the Department) and entities established under Title I of the ACA. In addition, the Secretary is authorized to prescribe the Department's governance, conduct, and performance of its business, including, here, how HHS will apply the standards of Section 1557 to HHS-administered health programs and activities.


Assuntos
Direitos Civis/legislação & jurisprudência , Atenção à Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Preconceito/prevenção & controle , Atenção à Saúde/ética , Pessoas com Deficiência , Identidade de Gênero , Planos de Assistência de Saúde para Empregados/legislação & jurisprudência , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Seguro Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Preconceito/legislação & jurisprudência , Comportamento Sexual , Estados Unidos
17.
Eur J Health Law ; 23(1): 5-35, 2016 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27044170

RESUMO

In recent years the European Union (EU) has sought to develop a far-reaching policy regarding persons with disabilities. However, to date, EU non-discrimination legislation does not provide any clear legal definition of what constitutes a disability. The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has attempted to fill this gap and, in several decisions, has elaborated on the concept of disability and its meaning under EU law. The CJEU, with reference to the application of the Employment Equality Directive, has explained the notion of disability mainly by comparing and contrasting it to the concept of sickness. Against this background, this article critically discusses recent case law and attempts to highlight that, even though the Court has firmly embraced the social model of disability envisaged by the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, the boundaries between the concepts of sickness and disability remain blurred.


Assuntos
Pessoas com Deficiência/legislação & jurisprudência , Emprego/legislação & jurisprudência , Preconceito/legislação & jurisprudência , União Europeia , Humanos , Política Pública/legislação & jurisprudência
19.
Am J Public Health ; 106(3): 534-40, 2016 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26794162

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To examine whether indicators of community- and state-level lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender equality are associated with transgender veterans' mental health. METHODS: We extracted Veterans Administration data for patients who were diagnosed with gender identity disorder, had at least 1 visit in 2013, and lived in a zip code with a Municipality Equality Index score (n = 1640). We examined the associations of whether a state included transgender status in employment nondiscrimination laws and in hate crimes laws with mood disorders; alcohol, illicit drug, and tobacco use disorders; posttraumatic stress disorder; and suicidal ideation or attempt. RESULTS: Nearly half (47.3%) of the sample lived in states with employment discrimination protection, and 44.8% lived in states with hate crimes protection. Employment nondiscrimination protection was associated with 26% decreased odds of mood disorders (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.59, 0.93) and 43% decreased odds of self-directed violence (AOR = 0.57; 95% CI = 0.34, 0.95). CONCLUSIONS: Understanding lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender social stressors can inform treatment and care coordination for transgender populations.


Assuntos
Saúde Mental/estatística & dados numéricos , Preconceito/legislação & jurisprudência , Preconceito/psicologia , Pessoas Transgênero/psicologia , Veteranos/psicologia , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transtornos do Humor/epidemiologia , Política , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/epidemiologia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/epidemiologia , Ideação Suicida , Tentativa de Suicídio/estatística & dados numéricos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA