Siniestralidad y apnea obstructiva del sueño. Revisión de la literatura y evaluación de la situación en 3 países latinoamericanos / Accident Rate and Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Literature Review and Assessment of the Situation in Three Latin American Countries

La apnea obstructiva del sueño (AOS) es una condición común en adultos en edad laboral. Incluso, en la actualidad, vemos cómo la edad de retiro se ha ido prolongando de tal manera que adultos mayores, quienes tienen mayor prevalencia de AOS, continúan trabajando incluso en situaciones de alto riesgo de siniestralidad. Uno de los principales síntomas de la AOS es la somnolencia diurna que puede contri- buir de manera directa al riesgo de accidentabilidad, compromiso cognitivo y desem- peño laboral. También se ha demostrado cómo la reducción de la materia gris a nivel cerebral y cerebelar provoca alteraciones en coordinación y capacidad de conducción. El tratamiento con dispositivos de presión positiva mejora el desempeño laboral y redu- ce la incidencia de accidentes de tránsito, pero algunos déficits cognitivos pueden per- sistir incluso después de meses de tratamiento. La evaluación del riesgo de accidentabilidad en conductores es un desafío y los cues- tionarios actuales no son adecuados para el cribado. Los simuladores de conducción y las pruebas de alerta son más prometedores. El futuro de la investigación se centra en estandarizar los resultados de los simulado- res, determinar los mejores predictores de eventos reales y utilizar la inteligencia arti- ficial y los automóviles autónomos para reducir los riesgos relacionados con la somno - lencia al volante. Es necesario que la posición de los entes gubernamentales de nuestros países latinoa- mericanos sea proactiva y orientada a la protección de la salud y la seguridad de la po- blación.

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common condition among working-age adults. In today's context, we observe that the retirement age has been extended, with older adults, who have a higher prevalence of OSA, continuing to work even in high-risk situations. One of the main symptoms of OSA is daytime sleepiness, which can directly contribu- te to the risk of accidents, cognitive impairment and reduced work performance. It has also been demonstrated that the reduction of gray matter in the brain, especially in the cerebellum, can lead to coordination and driving capacity impairments. Treatment with positive pressure devices improves work performance and reduces the incidence of traffic accidents, but some cognitive deficits may persist even after months of treatment. Assessing the risk of accidents in drivers is a challenge, and current questionnaires are not suitable for screening. Driving simulators and alertness tests show more promise. The future of research is focused on standardizing simulator outcomes, identifying the best predictors of real-world events, and utilizing artificial intelligence and autonomous vehicles to mitigate risks associated with driver drowsiness. It is imperative that the stance of government entities in our Latin American countries is proactive and aimed at safeguarding the health and safety of the population.

Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Brazilian version of the instrument World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) for individuals with obstructive sleep apnoea.

BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is a disabling health condition, and there is no disease-specific patient-reported outcome instrument to assess individuals with OSA. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) in individuals with OSA. METHODS: One hundred individuals with OSA responded to the WHODAS 2.0 version of 36 items, the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and the 12-item health survey (SF-12). Internal consistency, convergent and discriminative validity, and responsiveness to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) were the psychometric properties tested. RESULTS: Cronbach's α values indicate good internal consistency (0.91 - 0.73), except for the self-care domain (α = 0.52). Convergent validity indicated an excellent correlation (r = -0.80) between the domains of functioning and quality of life. Discriminative validity showed no association between OSA severity and functioning (p = 0.90). The responsiveness to CPAP treatment showed a large effect size (r = 0.82; p < 0.05) CONCLUSIONS: The WHODAS 2.0 instrument is valid, reliable, and responsive for assessing individuals with OSA.

Exploring Heterogeneity in Cost-Effectiveness Using Machine Learning Methods: A Case Study Using the FIRST-ABC Trial.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore heterogeneity in the cost-effectiveness of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy compared with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in children following extubation. DESIGN: Using data from the FIRST-line support for Assistance in Breathing in Children (FIRST-ABC) trial, we explore heterogeneity at the individual and subgroup levels using a causal forest approach, alongside a seemingly unrelated regression (SUR) approach for comparison. SETTINGS: FIRST-ABC is a noninferiority randomized controlled trial (ISRCTN60048867) including children in UK paediatric intensive care units, which compared HFNC with CPAP as the first-line mode of noninvasive respiratory support. PATIENTS: In the step-down FIRST-ABC, 600 children clinically assessed to require noninvasive respiratory support were randomly assigned to HFNC and CPAP groups with 1:1 treatment allocation ratio. In this analysis, 118 patients were excluded because they did not consent to accessing their medical records, did not consent to follow-up questionnaire or did not receive respiratory support. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome of this study is the incremental net monetary benefit (INB) of HFNC compared with CPAP using a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20,000 per QALY gain. INB is calculated based on total costs and quality adjusted life years (QALYs) at 6 months. The findings suggest modest heterogeneity in cost-effectiveness of HFNC compared with CPAP at the subgroup level, while greater heterogeneity is detected at the individual level. CONCLUSIONS: The estimated overall INB of HFNC is smaller than the INB for patients with better baseline status suggesting that HFNC can be more cost-effective among less severely ill patients.

The Cost-Effectiveness of Sleep Apnea Management: A Critical Evaluation of the Impact of Therapy on Health Care Costs.

TOPIC IMPORTANCE: OSA is a widespread condition that significantly affects both health and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). If left untreated, OSA can lead to accidents, decreased productivity, and medical complications, resulting in significant economic burdens including the direct costs of managing the disorder. Given the constraints on health care resources, understanding the cost-effectiveness of OSA management is crucial. A key factor in cost-effectiveness is whether OSA therapies reduce medical costs associated with OSA-related complications. REVIEW FINDINGS: Treatments for OSA have been shown to enhance HRQoL, particularly for symptomatic patients with moderate or severe disease. Economic studies also have demonstrated that these treatments are highly cost-effective. However, although substantial empirical evidence shows that untreated OSA is associated with increased medical costs, uncertainty remains about the impact of OSA treatment on these costs. Randomized controlled trials of positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy have failed to demonstrate cost reductions, but the studies have had important limitations. Observational studies suggest that PAP therapy may temper increases in costs, but only among patients who are highly adherent to treatment. However, the healthy adherer effect is an important potential source of bias in these studies. SUMMARY: OSA management is cost-effective, although uncertainties persist regarding the therapy's impact on medical costs. Future studies should focus on reducing bias, particularly the healthy adherer effect, and addressing other confounding factors to clarify potential medical cost savings. Promising avenues to further understanding include using quasiexperimental designs, incorporating more sophisticated characterization of OSA severity and symptoms, and leveraging newer technologies (eg, big data, wearables, and artificial intelligence).

Assessment and management of continuous positive airway pressure therapy in patient with obstructive sleep apnea.

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) causes excessive daytime sleepiness, impaired daytime functioning, and an increased risk of cardiovascular diseases. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is a highly effective therapy for moderate to severe OSA. Although CPAP adherence is commonly assessed using a 4-hthreshold, determining the optimal usage time based on clinical outcomes is crucial. While subjective sleepiness often improves with ≥4 h of CPAP usage, an extended duration (≥6 h) may be necessary to impact objective sleepiness. CPAP demonstrated a modest yet clinically meaningful dose-dependent effect on lowering blood pressure. For patients seeking antihypertensive benefits from CPAP therapy, the goal should extend beyond 4 h of use to maximize the therapeutic impact. Recognizing individual variations in sleep duration and responses to CPAP therapy is essential. The adoption of 'individualized goals for CPAP use,' outlining target times for specific outcomes, should also consider an individual's total sleep duration, including periods without CPAP. The impact of CPAP on clinical outcomes may vary, even with the same duration of CPAP use, depending on the period without CPAP use, particularly during the first or second half of sleep. Patients who remove or initiate CPAP midway or have a low CPAP usage frequency may require different forms of guidance. Tailoring patient education to address CPAP usage patterns may be necessary to enhanced satisfaction, self-efficacy, and adherence to therapy. Management of CPAP treatment should be personalized to meet individual needs and adapted based on specific response patterns for achieving treatment efficacy.

Association Between Sleep Apnea Treatment and Health Care Resource Use in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) contributes to the generation, recurrence, and perpetuation of atrial fibrillation, and it is associated with worse outcomes. Little is known about the economic impact of OSA therapy in atrial fibrillation. This retrospective cohort study assessed the impact of positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy adherence on health care resource use and costs in patients with OSA and atrial fibrillation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Insurance claims data for ≥1 year before sleep testing and 2 years after device setup were linked with objective PAP therapy use data. PAP adherence was defined from an extension of the US Medicare 90-day definition. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to create covariate-balanced PAP adherence groups to mitigate confounding. Of 5867 patients (32% women; mean age, 62.7 years), 41% were adherent, 38% were intermediate, and 21% were nonadherent. Mean±SD number of all-cause emergency department visits (0.61±1.21 versus 0.77±1.55 [P=0.023] versus 0.95±1.90 [P<0.001]), all-cause hospitalizations (0.19±0.69 versus 0.24±0.72 [P=0.002] versus 0.34±1.16 [P<0.001]), and cardiac-related hospitalizations (0.06±0.26 versus 0.09±0.41 [P=0.023] versus 0.10±0.44 [P=0.004]) were significantly lower in adherent versus intermediate and nonadherent patients, as were all-cause inpatient costs ($2200±$8054 versus $3274±$12 065 [P=0.002] versus $4483±$16 499 [P<0.001]). All-cause emergency department costs were significantly lower in adherent and intermediate versus nonadherent patients ($499±$1229 and $563±$1292 versus $691±$1652 [P<0.001 and P=0.002], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest clinical and economic benefits of PAP therapy in patients with concomitant OSA and atrial fibrillation. This supports the value of diagnosing and managing OSA and highlights the need for strategies to enhance PAP adherence in this population.

Snoring Survivors: the impact of obstructive sleep apnoea and continuous positive airway pressure use on in-hospital mortality, length of stay and costs among patients hospitalised with acute cardiovascular disease - A retrospective analysis of 2016-2019 National Inpatient Sample Data.

BACKGROUND: The routine administration of supplemental oxygen to non-hypoxic patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has been abandoned for lack of mortality benefit. However, the benefits of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) use in patients hospitalised with acute cardiovascular disease and concomitant obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) remain to be elucidated. METHODS: In this retrospective case-control analysis, using 10th International Classification of Diseases, Clinical Modification (ICD-10) codes, we searched the 2016-2019 Nationwide Inpatient Sample for patients diagnosed with unstable angina (UA), AMI, acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) and atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response (AFRVR), who also carried a diagnosis of OSA. We identified in-hospital CPAP use with ICD-10-Procedure Coding System codes. In-hospital death, length of stay (LOS) and hospital charges were compared between patients with and without OSA, and between OSA patients with and without CPAP use. RESULTS: Our sample included 2 959 991 patients, of which 1.5% were diagnosed with UA, 30.3% with AMI, 37.5% with ADHF and 45.8% with AFRVR. OSA was present in 12.3%. Patients with OSA were more likely to be younger, male, smokers, obese and have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, renal failure and heart failure (p<0.001 for all). Patients with OSA had significantly lower in-hospital mortality (aOR 0.71, 95% CI (0.7 to 0.73)). Among patients with OSA, CPAP use significantly increased the odds of in-hospital death (aOR 1.51, 95% CI (1.44 to 1.60)), LOS (adjusted mean difference of 1.49 days, 95% CI (1.43 to 1.55)) and hospital charges (adjusted mean difference of US$1168, 95% CI (273 to 2062)). CONCLUSION: Our study showed that patients with recognised OSA hospitalised for AMI, ADHF and AFRVR had significantly lower mortality regardless of CPAP use, while CPAP treatment among these patients was associated with significantly higher in-hospital mortality and resource utilisation. The routine use of CPAP during acute cardiovascular encounters could neutralise the impact of chronic intermittent ischaemic preconditioning.

Erectile dysfunction in patient with obstructive sleep apnea: effects of continuous positive airway pressure.

BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is linked to various health complications, including erectile dysfunction (ED), which is more prevalent in individuals with OSA. This study explored ED in Korean OSA patients and assessed the impact of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy on ED. METHODS: A total of 87 male patients with OSA from four different sleep centers underwent physical measurements and completed sleep and mental health (MH) questionnaires, including the Korean version of the International index of erectile function (IIEF), before and three months after initiating CPAP therapy. RESULTS: After three months of CPAP therapy, the patients demonstrated a significant improvement in ED as measured on the IIEF. However, the study found no significant correlation between the duration of CPAP use and the improvement in IIEF score. It did identify the SF36 quality of life assessment as a significant factor influencing ED improvement after CPAP. CONCLUSIONS: ED is a prevalent issue that escalates with age and is associated with OSA. CPAP therapy has shown potential in alleviating ED symptoms, particularly in those with underlying psychological conditions, although further research is required to confirm these findings and understand the underlying mechanisms.

Improvement in quality of life with continuous positive airway pressure outweighs the treatment burden in children with obstructive sleep apnea.

INTRODUCTION: Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) may pose a significant burden on families. We assessed the impact of CPAP for children on quality of life (QOL) and caregiver treatment burden. METHODS: Prospective cohort study of children commencing outpatient CPAP in a specialist sleep centre 2020-2022. Questionnaires regarding sleep-related symptoms (PROMIS Pediatric Sleep Disturbance and Sleep-Related Impairment), QOL (OSA-18, QI-Disability), caregiver burden (Caregiver Strain Questionnaire) and overall health impact (Glasgow Children's Benefit Inventory) were completed by caregivers at CPAP commencement and 6 weeks later. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients completed follow-up (7 female; median age 11.4 year, baseline obstructive apnea hypopnea index 10.3/h; 77% overweight or obese, 73% comorbidity other than obesity). OSA-related QOL (OSA-18) significantly improved at follow-up (p < 0.01), as did child general QOL (p < 0.001), sleep disturbance (p < 0.01) and sleep-related impairment (p < 0.001). Caregivers mostly rated CPAP as beneficial to their child's health but 19% rated CPAP as harmful or having no effect. Caregiver strain reduced at follow-up (p < 0.001) and benefit outweighed inconvenience (p < 0.0001) in 81%. CPAP adherence was correlated with overall health impact (r = 0.67, p < 0.01) but not with caregiver rating of inconvenience. CONCLUSIONS: CPAP resulted in improvements in QOL and sleep-related symptoms, and reduced caregiver strain. Perceived benefits outweighed the burden of treatment for most but not all families. CPAP adherence was moderately correlated with family-reported measures of benefit but not related to perceived inconvenience. This study provides reassuring evidence regarding the benefits and impacts of CPAP for children, many of whom already have complex health care needs.

Telemedicine management of obstructive sleep apnea disorder in China: a randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial.

PURPOSE: Previous studies assessed different components of telemedicine management pathway for OSA instead of the whole pathway. This randomized, controlled, and non-inferiority trial aimed to assess whether telemedicine management is clinically inferior to in-person care in China. METHODS: Adults suspected of OSA were randomized to telemedicine (web-based questionnaires, self-administered home sleep apnea test [HSAT], automatically adjusting positive airway pressure [APAP], and video-conference visits) or in-person management (paper questionnaires, in-person HSAT set-up, APAP, and face-to-face visits). Participants with an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 15 events/hour received APAP for 3 months. The non-inferiority analysis was based on the change in Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ) score and APAP adherence. Cost-effectiveness analysis was performed. RESULTS: In the modified intent-to-treat analysis set (n = 111 telemedicine, 111 in-person), FOSQ scores improved 1.73 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.31-2.14) points with telemedicine and 2.05 (1.64-2.46) points with in-person care. The lower bound of the one-sided 95% non-inferiority CI for the difference in change between groups of - 0.812 was larger than the non-inferiority threshold of - 1. APAP adherence at 3 months was 243.3 (223.1-263.5) minutes/night for telemedicine and 241.6 (221.3-261.8) minutes/night for in-person care. The lower bound of the one-sided 95% non-inferiority CI of - 22.2 min/night was higher than the non-inferiority delta of - 45 min/night. Telemedicine had lower total costs than in-person management (CNY 1482.7 ± 377.2 vs. 1912.6 ± 681.3; p < 0.0001), driven by patient costs, but no significant difference in QALYs. CONCLUSIONS: Functional outcomes and adherence were not clinically inferior in patients managed by a comprehensive telemedicine approach compared to those receiving in-person care in China. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://www.chictr.org.cn , Registration number ChiCTR2000030546. Retrospectively registered on March 06, 2020.

Performance of Claims-Based Algorithms for Adherence to Positive Airway Pressure Therapy in Commercially Insured Patients With OSA.

BACKGROUND: Positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy is first-line therapy for OSA, but consistent use is required for it to be effective. Previous studies have used Medicare fee-for-service claims data (eg, device, equipment charges) as a proxy for PAP adherence to assess its effects. However, this approach has not been validated in a US commercially insured population, where coverage rules are not standardized. RESEARCH QUESTION: In a commercially insured population in the United States, how well do claims-based algorithms for defining PAP adherence correspond with objective PAP device usage? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Deidentified administrative claims data of commercially insured patients (aged 18-64 years) with OSA were linked to objective PAP therapy usage data from cloud-connected devices. Adherence was defined based on device use (using an extension of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 90-day compliance criteria) and from claims-based algorithms to compare usage metrics and identify potential misclassifications. RESULTS: The final sample included 213,341 patients. Based on device usage, 48% were adherent in the first year. Based on claims, between 10% and 84% of patients were identified as adherent (accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity ranges: 53%-68%, 12%-95%, and 26%-92%, respectively). Relative to patients who were claims-adherent, patients who were device-adherent had consistently higher usage across all metrics (mean, 339.9 vs 260.0-290.0 days of use; 6.6 vs 5.1-5.6 d/wk; 6.4 vs 4.6-5.2 h/d). Consistent PAP users were frequently identified by claims-based algorithms as nonadherent, whereas many inconsistent users were classified by claims-based algorithms as adherent. INTERPRETATION: In aggregate US commercial data with nonstandardized PAP coverage rules, concordance between existing claims-based definitions and objective PAP use was low. Caution is warranted when applying existing claims-based algorithms to commercial populations.

Inequalities in the access to diagnosis and treatment of obstructive sleep apnea in Brazil: a cross-sectional study.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is highly prevalent, and positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy is the primary treatment. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic and PAP treatment resources for OSA within Brazil's Unified Health System and to identify potential inequalities and gaps. METHODS: A structured survey was sent to members of the Brazilian Sleep Association and the Brazilian Association of Sleep Medicine to identify sleep laboratories providing OSA diagnosis and/or treatment within Brazil's Unified Health System. The numbers of centers, care team structure, sleep studies availability, PAP accessibility, and follow-up services were characterized in all 5 Brazilian regions. RESULTS: Forty-seven centers were identified: Midwest (n = 4), Northeast (n = 10), North (n = 3), Southeast (n = 22), and South (n = 8). Most centers (70%) provided both OSA diagnosis and treatment, mainly in capitals and/or metropolises (87%). Ten out of 27 Brazilian Federal Units lacked sleep services for OSA management, with the North having the highest proportion of states without a sleep service (71%). The annual number of diagnostic exams for OSA was 14,932, with significant heterogeneity across regions (Midwest: 240; North: 400; Northeast: 3,564; South: 4,380; Southeast: 6,348). Mean waiting times for diagnosis and treatment were 11 and 8 months, respectively. Only 46% of PAP treatments were publicly funded, making legal injunctions and out-of-pocket expenditure common practices. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed significant disparities in OSA diagnosis and treatment resources across Brazil, with the North region being particularly underserved. The findings underscore an urgent need for strategies to improve sleep care nationwide. CITATION: Drager LF, Santos RB, Pachito D, Albertini CS, Sert Kuniyoshi FH, Eckeli AL. Inequalities in the access to diagnosis and treatment of obstructive sleep apnea in Brazil: a cross-sectional study. J Clin Sleep Med. 2024;20(5):735-742.

Cost-Utility Analysis of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Therapy Compared With Usual Care for Obstructive Sleep Apnea in the Public Health System in Brazil.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to conduct a cost-utility analysis of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy compared with usual care as treatment of moderate to severe cases of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in Brazil, where decentralized policies of CPAP provision are in place. METHODS: Markov cohort model comparing CPAP therapy with usual care, that is, no specific treatment for OSA, for moderate to severe cases was used. The payer perspective from the Unified Health System, Brazil, was adopted. Effectiveness parameters and costs related to health states were informed by literature review. Resource use related to CPAP therapy was defined by specialists and costs informed by recent purchase and leasing contracts. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were generated for purchase and leasing contracts to reflect current practices. A conservative willingness-to-pay threshold was set at 1 gross domestic product per capita per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) (Brazilian reais [BRL] 40 712/QALY). Uncertainties were explored in deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for the purchase modality was 8303 BRL/QALY and for leasing 45 192 BRL/QALY. Considering the adopted willingness-to-pay threshold, provision of CPAP by the purchase modality was considered cost-effective but not the leasing modality. The parameter related to the greatest uncertainty was the reduction in the risk of having a stroke attributable to CPAP. Probabilistic analysis confirmed the robustness of results. CONCLUSIONS: CPAP therapy is a cost-effective alternative compared with usual care for moderate to severe OSA for the purchase modality. These results should help underpinning the decision making related to a uniform policy of CPAP provision across the country.

High-flow nasal cannula use in pediatric patients for other indications than acute bronchiolitis-a scoping review of randomized controlled trials.

The objective of the study is to summarize current literature on high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) use for different indications in pediatric patient excluding acute bronchiolitis and neonatal care. The study design is a systematic scoping review. Pubmed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched in February, 2023. All abstracts and full texts were screened by two independent reviewers. Randomized controlled trials focusing on HFNC use in pediatric patients (age < 18 years) were included. Studies focusing on acute bronchiolitis and neonatal respiratory conditions were excluded. Study quality was assessed by Cochrane risk of bias 2.0 tool. The main outcomes are patient groups and indications, key outcomes, and risk of bias. After screening 1276 abstracts, we included 22 full reports. Risk of bias was low in 11 and high in 5 studies. We identified three patient groups where HFNC has been studied: first, children requiring primary respiratory support for acute respiratory failure; second, perioperative use for either intraprocedural oxygenation or postoperative respiratory support; and third, post-extubation care in pediatric intensive care for other than postoperative patients. Clinical and laboratory parameters were assessed as key outcomes. None of the studies analyzed cost-effectiveness.Conclusion: This systematic scoping review provides an overview of current evidence for HFNC use in pediatric patients. Future studies should aim for better quality and include economic evaluation with cost-effectiveness analysis.Protocol registration: Protocol has been published https://osf.io/a3y46/ .

Long-term health outcomes for patients with obstructive sleep apnea: placing the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality report in context-a multisociety commentary.

This multisociety commentary critically examines the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) final report and systematic review on long-term health outcomes in obstructive sleep apnea. The AHRQ report was commissioned by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and particularly focused on the long-term patient-centered outcomes of continuous positive airway pressure, the variability of sleep-disordered breathing metrics, and the validity of these metrics as surrogate outcomes. This commentary raises concerns regarding the AHRQ report conclusions and their potential implications for policy decisions. A major concern expressed in this commentary is that the AHRQ report inadequately acknowledges the benefits of continuous positive airway pressure for several established, long-term clinically important outcomes including excessive sleepiness, motor vehicle accidents, and blood pressure. While acknowledging the limited evidence for the long-term benefits of continuous positive airway pressure treatment, especially cardiovascular outcomes, as summarized by the AHRQ report, this commentary reviews the limitations of recent randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized controlled studies and the challenges of conducting future randomized controlled trials. A research agenda to address these challenges is proposed including study designs that may include both high quality randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized controlled studies. This commentary concludes by highlighting implications for the safety and quality of life for the millions of people living with obstructive sleep apnea if the AHRQ report alone was used by payers to limit coverage for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea while not considering the totality of available evidence. CITATION: Patil SP, Billings ME, Bourjeily G, et al. Long-term health outcomes for patients with obstructive sleep apnea: placing the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality report in context-a multisociety commentary. J Clin Sleep Med. 2024;20(1):135-149.

Depression and comorbid obstructive sleep apnea: Association between positive airway pressure adherence, occurrence of self-harm events, healthcare resource utilization, and costs.

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have shown that treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) with positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy in patients with depression may improve depression symptoms and response to antidepressant therapy. We investigated the association between PAP therapy adherence, self-harm events, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and costs over 2 years in a national sample of patients with pre-existing depression and newly diagnosed comorbid OSA. METHODS: Administrative claims data were linked to objective PAP therapy usage. Inverse probability treatment weighting was used to compare outcomes over 2 years across PAP adherence levels. The predicted numbers of emergency room (ER) visits and hospitalizations by adherence level were assessed using risk-adjusted generalized linear models. RESULTS: 37,459 patients were included. Relative to non-adherent patients, consistently adherent patients had fewer self-harm events (0.04 vs 0.05, p < 0.001) after 1 year, and significantly (all p < 0.001) fewer ER visits (0.66 vs 0.86) and all-cause hospitalizations (0.13 vs 0.17), and lower total ($11,847 vs $11,955), inpatient hospitalization ($1634 vs $2274), and ER visit ($760 vs $1006) costs per patient in the second year of PAP therapy. Consistently adherent patients showed lower risk for hospitalizations and ER visits. LIMITATIONS: Using observational claims data, we were unable to assess clinical characteristics including sleep, sleepiness, and daytime symptoms, or important social determinants of health. We were limited in assessing care received outside of the included health plans. CONCLUSION: Consistent adherence to PAP therapy over 2 years was associated with improved HCRU outcomes for patients with pre-existing depression newly diagnosed with comorbid OSA.

Appareils à pression positive continue pour le traitement de l'apnée obstructive du sommeil / Continuous positive airway pressure devices for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea

MANDAT: L'Institut national d'excellence en santé et en services sociaux (INESSS) a reçu le mandat de la Direction générale des affaires universitaires, médicales, infirmières et pharmaceutiques (DGAUMIP) du ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux (MSSS) de produire un état des connaissances sur les politiques publiques de remboursement d'appareils à pression positive continue (PPC) pour le traitement de l'apnée obstructive du sommeil (AOS). MÉTHODE: Une revue rapide de la littérature et des démarches participatives pour une collecte de données contextuelles et expérientielles ont été réalisées sur les appareils à PPC pour le traitement de l'AOS. Une analyse d'impact budgétaire a été effectuée par l'INESSS. MISE EN CONTEXTE: L'AOS est symptomatique lorsque l'occlusion des voies respiratoires supérieures (VRS) et l'augmentation de l'effort respiratoire surviennent conjointement avec un sommeil non réparateur. Bien que la prévalence réelle demeure incertaine au Québec, les données de la littérature suggèrent que près de 39 % de la population générale serait atteinte de l'AOS. Au Québec, la prise en charge de cette condition comprend : l'identification des symptômes par des cliniciens; l'épreuve de sommeil; le diagnostic; le choix du traitement en concertation entre le patient et les professionnels de la santé; et l'accompagnement des patients. Selon les cliniciens consultés, la stratégie de diagnostic se base davantage sur l'évaluation des symptômes que sur la mesure de la sévérité de la maladie (légère, modérée ou sévère) à l'aide de différentes épreuves du sommeil. Cependant, près de 80 % des personnes atteintes demeureraient sans diagnostic. Celles qui détiennent une assurance privée ou qui bénéficient d'une assistance sociale ont une couverture pour les appareils à PPC. Toutefois, certaines personnes se trouvent sans couverture. Afin de bonifier l'accessibilité du traitement, le ministre de la Santé et des Services sociaux du Québec a annoncé en avril 2023 une mesure de financement annuelle pour le remboursement des appareils à PPC. Les modalités de cette mesure de remboursement ne sont pas encore définies. LE TRAITEMENT PAR PRESSION POSITIVE CONTINUE: Les appareils à PPC poussent de l'air de façon non effractive dans les VRS sans interférer avec le réflexe respiratoire naturel afin de maintenir la constance de la pression d'air durant la nuit. Au Québec, les appareils à PPC constituent le traitement indiqué pour la majorité des adultes et certains enfants qui ont reçu un diagnostic d'AOS. Les cliniciens consultés ont jugé plausibles les données de la littérature qui rapportent que 57 % des patients adultes adhèrent adéquatement au traitement par PPC. Le succès du traitement dépend, entre autres, de la qualité de l'accompagnement par les professionnels de la santé et du suivi par télésurveillance de l'adhésion des patients au traitement par PPC. COUVERTURE PUBLIQUE DANS D'AUTRES PAYS ET TERRITOIRES: Deux modèles de prestations concernant les appareils à PPC ont été repérés dans la littérature grise. Dans certains pays et territoires, le modèle de prestation conjointe publique et privée finance partiellement et à des intervalles réguliers l'achat de l'appareil et de certains accessoires. Ce modèle soutient l'accès au traitement et dissocie les parties médicale et technique de la prestation des soins. Pour d'autres pays et territoires, le modèle de prestation publique couvre complètement le suivi médical, l'accompagnement du patient et le prêt d'équipement. POPULATION CIBLE ET ANALYSE ÉCONOMIQUE: L'analyse d'impact budgétaire réalisée par l'INESSS vise à quantifier l'impact financier attendu à la suite de l'implantation d'une politique publique de remboursement des appareils à PPC pour le traitement de l'AOS. Le coût net par patient adulte sur 5 ans est estimé à 4 505 $, alors que ce coût par patient en pédiatrie est estimé à 8 847 $. En fonction de la population ciblée, le volume de patients (impact budgétaire) sur 5 ans est estimé à 354 884 personnes avec une couverture de la population totale (1 408,3 M$), au moins 92 270 personnes non assurées (366,1 M$) ou 24 198 personnes à faibles revenus qui ne sont pas couvertes par l'assistance sociale du Québec (96,0 M$). Il est estimé que l'impact financier annuel croitra de près de 45 % sur 5 ans, principalement en raison du renouvellement des accessoires. ÉLÉMENTS À CONSIDÉRER POUR L'IMPLANTATION: Selon les consultations menées par l'INESSS, l'introduction d'une politique publique au Québec doit tenir compte des ressources actuellement limitées des établissements de santé. L'intégration du secteur privé dans cette politique devrait également tenir compte des pratiques spécifiques à ce secteur. Plusieurs autres éléments pourraient faire partie de la réflexion, tels que : la priorisation de certains groupes de patients; l'importance du sous-diagnostic; l'accès au du traitement; les critères d'accès au remboursement; et les accessoires et services inclus dans la prestation. CONCLUSION: Cet état des connaissances brosse le portrait de la prise en charge de l'apnée du sommeil par appareils à PPC au Québec et explore les enjeux potentiels liés à l'implantation d'une politique de couverture publique complète ou partielle. Selon les objectifs, certains paramètres devront être définis afin d'assurer le maximum d'avantages pour les patients. De plus, des incertitudes liées à la disponibilité des ressources et à l'organisation des services entourant ce remboursement au Québec ont été mises en lumière et pourraient être un frein à une implantation optimale.

MANDATE: The Institut national d'excellence en santé et en services sociaux (INESSS) was mandated by the Direction générale des affaires universitaires, médicales, infirmières et pharmaceutiques (DGAUMIP) of the Ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux (MSSS) to produce a state-of-knowledge report on the public remboursement policies for continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). METHOD: The approach includes a rapid review of the scientific literature and a participatory process to collect contextual and experiential data for the treatment of OSA with CPAP. A budgetary impact analysis was also performed. CONTEXT AND SETTING: OSA is considered symptomatic when blocked upper airways and increased respiratory effort occur in conjunction with non-restorative sleep. Although the actual prevalence of OSA remains uncertain in Quebec, literature data suggests that nearly 39% of the general population is affected by OSA. In Quebec, OSA care includes identification of symptoms by a sleep medical doctor; sleep tests and patient diagnostic; treatment choice through collaboration between the patient and health professionals; and treatment support. According to the clinicians consulted, the diagnostic strategy is based more on the evaluation of symptoms than on measuring the severity of the disease (mild, moderate or severe) using different sleep tests. However, its estimated that nearly 80% of adults with OSA are not diagnosed. For coverage of expenses related to the CPAP device, it is estimated that 74% of diagnosed patients have a private insurance and 3.1% benefit from social assistance. The remaining patients currently have no coverage. To improve access to treatment, the Ministre de la Santé et des Services sociaux du Québec announced in April 2023 a measure, with recurring funding, for the reimbursement of CPAP devices. Terms and conditions of this reimbursement measure are not yet defined. POSITIVE PRESSURE TREATMENT: CPAP devices push air into the upper airways without interfering with the natural respiratory reflex. In Quebec, CPAP devices are the main indication for the treatment of adults and children with OSA. The adherence to CPAP treatment is about 57% amid adult patients, based on literature data that was confirmed by the clinicians consulted in this report. Treatment success depends, in part, on the quality of support provided by healthcare professionals and the telemonitoring of treatment adherence. PUBLIC COVERAGE IN OTHER COUNTRIES AND TERRITORIES: Two reimbursement models for CPAP devices have been identified in the literature. In some countries and territories, a joint public-private model partially funds the CPAP device and accessory purchases. This model covers access to treatment and separates the medical and technical parts of care delivery. Whereas in other countries and territories, a public model fully covers medical follow-up, patient support and equipment loans. TARGET POPULATION AND ECONOMIC ANALYSIS: A budgetary impact analysis was carried out by INESSS to quantify the expected financial impact of a public policy reimbursing CPAP devices for the treatment of OSA. The net cost per adult patient is estimated at $4,505 over 5 years, whereas this cost per pediatric patient is estimated at $8,847. Depending on the target population, the volume of patients (budgetary impact) over 5 years is estimated as follows: 354,884 individuals with coverage across the entire population ($1,408.3 million), at least 92,270 uninsured individuals ($366.1 million), or 24,198 low-income individuals not covered by Quebec's social assistance ($96.0 million). The annual financial impact is estimated to increase by nearly 45% over 5 years, primarily due to accessory replacements. IMPLEMENTATION CONSIDERATIONS: According to the consultations carried out by INESSS, the introduction of a reimbursement policy in Quebec must consider the currently limited resources of healthcare facilities. The best practices in industry should also define the role of the private sector in the upcoming policy. Other elements that should be considered include prioritization of certain patient groups; significant under-diagnosis; treatment accessibility; reimbursement access criteria; and accessories and services included in the benefit. CONCLUSION: This state-of-knowledge report describes OSA care in Quebec and identifies the potential issues involved in implementing a public policy with a full or partial coverage for CPAP treatment. Depending on the objectives and the preferred approach, various parameters of this upcoming policy will need to be defined to ensure maximum benefit for patients. In addition, some uncertainties related to the availability of resources and the organization of services surrounding this reimbursement in Quebec have been highlighted and could hinder optimal implementation.

Positive Airway Pressure Therapy Adherence and Health Care Resource Use in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.

Background Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is common in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, current evidence is equivocal regarding the potential benefits of treating OSA with positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy in HFpEF. This study assessed the association between adherence to PAP therapy and health care resource use in patients with OSA and HFpEF. Methods and Results Administrative insurance claims data linked with objective PAP therapy usage data from patients with OSA and HFpEF were used to determine associations between PAP adherence and a composite outcome including hospitalizations and emergency room visits. One-year PAP adherence was based on an adapted US Medicare definition. Propensity score methods were used to create groups with similar characteristics across PAP adherence levels. The study cohort included 4237 patients (54.0% female, mean age 64.1 years); 40% were considered adherent to PAP therapy (30% intermediate adherent, 30% nonadherent). In the matched cohort, PAP-adherent patients had fewer health care resource use visits than nonadherent patients, a 57% decrease in hospitalizations, and a 36% decrease in emergency room visits versus the year before PAP initiation. Total health care costs were lower in adherent patients than nonadherent patients ($12 732 versus $15 610, P<0.001). Outcomes for intermediately adherent patients were most similar to those for nonadherent patients. Conclusions Treating OSA with PAP therapy in patients with HFpEF was associated with a reduction in health care resource use. These data highlight the importance of managing concomitant OSA in patients with HFpEF, and the need for strategies to enhance PAP adherence in this population.