Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 89
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Health Aff (Millwood) ; 39(9): 1615-1623, 2020 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32644825

RESUMO

Most states enacted shelter-in-place orders when mitigating the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Emerging evidence indicates that these orders have reduced COVID-19 cases. Using data starting at different dates in March and going through May 15, 2020, we examined the effects of shelter-in-place orders on daily growth rates of both COVID-19 deaths and hospitalizations, using event study models. We found that shelter-in-place orders reduced both the daily mortality growth rate nearly three weeks after their enactment and the daily growth rate of hospitalizations two weeks after their enactment. After forty-two days from enactment, the daily mortality growth rate declined by up to 6.1 percentage points. Projections suggest that as many as 250,000-370,000 deaths were possibly averted by May 15 in the forty-two states plus Washington, D.C., that had statewide shelter-in-place orders. The daily hospitalization growth rate examined in nineteen states with shelter-in-place orders and three states without them that had data on hospitalizations declined by up to 8.4 percentage points after forty-two days. This evidence suggests that shelter-in-place orders have been effective in reducing the daily growth rates of COVID-19 deaths and hospitalizations.


Assuntos
Infecções por Coronavirus/prevenção & controle , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Mortalidade/tendências , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Pneumonia Viral/prevenção & controle , Prevenção Primária/legislação & jurisprudência , Quarentena/legislação & jurisprudência , COVID-19 , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pandemias/estatística & dados numéricos , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Formulação de Políticas , Melhoria de Qualidade , Estados Unidos
4.
Prog Cardiovasc Dis ; 62(5): 406-413, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31672610

RESUMO

In our increasingly cost-conscious health system, patients, clinicians, hospitals, and payers all agree about the urgent need to rein in runaway healthcare costs. High pharmaceutical costs make drugs unaffordable to many patients who may benefit from them, including some insured patients who face prohibitive out-of-pocket costs. Health systems and payers can use the systematic framework of cost-effectiveness analysis and estimated budgetary impact to prioritize the adoption of new therapies and technologies. In this review article, we discuss basic principles of cost-effectiveness research for practicing clinicians, the concept of cost-effectiveness versus affordability, other considerations relevant to resource allocation, and limitations of cost-effectiveness research. We use the example of lipid lowering therapies to discuss application of cost-effectiveness research in informing health care policy, its use for health care systems and in the development of clinical practice guidelines, and its implications for clinicians and patients. As clinicians and patients become more cognizant of the cost-implications of new therapies, professional societies can help improve the quality of decision-making by incorporating unbiased value statements into their expert guidelines.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/economia , Custos de Medicamentos , Dislipidemias/tratamento farmacológico , Dislipidemias/economia , Hipolipemiantes/economia , Hipolipemiantes/uso terapêutico , Formulação de Políticas , Doenças Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Dislipidemias/diagnóstico , Dislipidemias/epidemiologia , Humanos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Prevenção Primária/economia , Prevenção Primária/legislação & jurisprudência , Prevenção Secundária/economia , Prevenção Secundária/legislação & jurisprudência , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
BMC Public Health ; 19(1): 810, 2019 Jun 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31234812

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Harmful alcohol use is a modifiable risk factor contributing to the increasing burden of non-communicable diseases and deaths and the implementation of policies focused on primary prevention is pivotal to address this challenge. Policies with actions targeting the harmful use of alcohol have been developed in Nigeria. This study is an in-depth analysis of alcohol-related policies in Nigeria and the utilization of WHO Best Buy interventions (BBIs) and multi-sectoral action (MSA) in the formulation of these policies. METHODS: A descriptive case study design and the Walt and Gilson framework of policy analysis was utilized for the research. Components of the study included a scoping review consisting of electronic search of Google and three online databases (Google Scholar, Science Direct and PubMed) to identify articles and policy documents with no language and date restrictions. Government institution provided documents which were not online. Thirteen policy documents, reports or articles relevant to the policy formulation process were identified. Other components of the study included interviews with 44 key informants (Bureaucrats and Policy Makers) using a pretested guide. The qualitative data were coded and analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Findings revealed that policy actions to address harmful alcohol use are proposed in the 2007 Federal Road Safety Act, the Non-communicable Diseases Prevention and Control Policy and the Strategic Plan of Action. Only one of the best buy interventions, (restricted access to alcohol) is proposed in these policies. Multi-sectoral action for the formulation of alcohol-related policy was low and several relevant sectors with critical roles in policy implementation were not involved in the formulation process. Overall, alcohol currently has no holistic, health-sector led policy document to regulate the marketing, promotion of alcohol and accessibility. A major barrier is the low government budgetary allocation to support the process. CONCLUSIONS: Nigeria has few alcohol-related policies with weak multi-sectoral action. Funding constraint remains a major threat to the implementation and enforcement of proposed policy actions.


Assuntos
Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas/legislação & jurisprudência , Política de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Formulação de Políticas , Prevenção Primária/legislação & jurisprudência , Política Pública , Humanos , Nigéria , Doenças não Transmissíveis/prevenção & controle , Fatores de Risco
7.
Circulation ; 139(23): e1025-e1032, 2019 06 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31030543

RESUMO

Current dietary intakes of North Americans are inconsistent with the Dietary Guidelines for Americans. This occurs in the context of a food system that precludes healthy foods as the default choices. To develop a food system that is both healthy and sustainable requires innovation. This science advisory from the American Heart Association describes both innovative approaches to developing a healthy and sustainable food system and the current evidence base for the associations between these approaches and positive changes in dietary behaviors, dietary intakes, and when available, health outcomes. Innovation can occur through policy, private sector, public health, medical, community, or individual-level approaches and could ignite and further public-private partnerships. New product innovations, reformulations, taxes, incentives, product placement/choice architecture, innovative marketing practices, menu and product labeling, worksite wellness initiatives, community campaigns, nutrition prescriptions, mobile health technologies, and gaming offer potential benefits. Some innovations have been observed to increase the purchasing of healthy foods or have increased diversity in food choices, but there remains limited evidence linking these innovations with health outcomes. The demonstration of evidence-based improvements in health outcomes is challenging for any preventive interventions, especially those related to diet, because of competing lifestyle and environmental risk factors that are difficult to quantify. A key next step in creating a healthier and more sustainable food system is to build innovative system-level approaches that improve individual behaviors, strengthen industry and community efforts, and align policies with evidence-based recommendations. To enable healthier food choices and favorably impact cardiovascular health, immediate action is needed to promote favorable innovation at all levels of the food system.


Assuntos
Conservação dos Recursos Naturais , Dieta Saudável/normas , Abastecimento de Alimentos/normas , Doenças não Transmissíveis/prevenção & controle , Estado Nutricional , Prevenção Primária/normas , Recomendações Nutricionais , Comportamento de Redução do Risco , American Heart Association , Conservação dos Recursos Naturais/legislação & jurisprudência , Difusão de Inovações , Ingestão de Energia , Comportamento Alimentar , Abastecimento de Alimentos/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Doenças não Transmissíveis/epidemiologia , Valor Nutritivo , Formulação de Políticas , Prevenção Primária/legislação & jurisprudência , Parcerias Público-Privadas , Recomendações Nutricionais/legislação & jurisprudência , Fatores de Risco , Participação dos Interessados , Estados Unidos
8.
Wiad Lek ; 71(2 pt 2): 383-388, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29786590

RESUMO

A comparative legal research of human rights provision in Ukraine and Georgia, in the aspect of combating viral HCV, was conducted. Ukrainian advocacy experience and Georgian strategic litigation experience with regard to human rights and HCV was analyzed. Key international instruments, which lay the conceptual foundations as well as outline the measures, which are directed at human rights in patient care provision and fighting viral hepatitis, were elucidated. Attention was paid to the Global health sector strategy. Viral hepatitis, 2016 - 2021 [1], which, for the first time, defined a global strategy on fighting viral hepatitis, in particular HCV and envisaged the advocacy vectors. The frames of interaction of the human rights in patient care concept and public health, which consists in realization of certain human rights were elucidated and the necessity to embody the human rights in patient care concept into the state policy in the field of public health was determined. It was found out that a common international problem in combating HCV is a deficiency of financial resources, which are necessary for effective fighting the epidemics and guarantee equal access to treatment for every person. The international community outlined five most important spheres, which require investments and will catalyze the measures, which need to be taken in order to fight hepatitis. Analysis of the Ukrainian experience was focused on the issue of donated blood safety and successful advocacy campaigns, which were carried out in order to promote the adoption of programs on prophylactics, diagnostics and treatment of HCV both on national and regional levels. Examples of ensuring the rights of the marginalized groups during HCV treatment, in particular of the people who inject drugs, people living with HIV, participants of the antiterrorist operation were provided. Interesting and important is the experience of Georgia concerning human rights protection in the ECtHR, which has a legal effect for other countries which ratified the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, for instance for Ukraine, where the EctHR judgments are recognized as a source of law.


Assuntos
Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/legislação & jurisprudência , Hepatite C/prevenção & controle , Direitos Humanos/legislação & jurisprudência , Prevenção Primária/legislação & jurisprudência , República da Geórgia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Hepatite C/epidemiologia , Humanos , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Saúde Pública/legislação & jurisprudência , Ucrânia
9.
Eur J Prev Cardiol ; 25(16): 1725-1734, 2018 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29635927

RESUMO

Background Mortality from cardiovascular diseases is particularly high in Russia compared with the European average. The National Priority Project 'Health', launched in 2005, aimed to promote prevention of non-communicable diseases, particularly cardiovascular diseases, in primary care and to increase availability of state-of-art cardiovascular disease management. Methods This is a multiregional population based study with analysis of indicators for cardiovascular health and coronary heart disease in Moscow, St Petersburg, the Moscow region and across Russia, including a total population of 143.7 million inhabitants between 2005 and 2013. Data were collected using conventional methodology and originate from open statistical sources. Results The overall age-standardized coronary heart disease mortality decreased in 2005-2013 by 24.7% from 383.6 to 289.0 per 100000 population, but with substantial interregional differences: it declined from 306.1 to 196.9 per 100,000 in Moscow (-35.7%), from 362.1 to 258.9 per 100,000 in St Petersburg (-28.5%) and from 433.8 to 374.3 per 100,000 in the Moscow region (-13.7%). Income in Moscow exceeded the national average 2-3-fold, and Moscow had the highest availability of modern treatments and interventions. Although vegetables, fruits and fish consumption increased overall in Russia, this trend was most prominent in Moscow. Indicators for psychosocial well-being also were best in Moscow. Life expectancy in Moscow is almost six years higher than the Russian average. Conclusion Health policy interventions turned out to be successful but with substantial interregional differences. Lower coronary heart disease mortality and higher life expectancy in Moscow may be due to a more favourable socioeconomic and psychological environment, more healthy eating and greater availability of medical care.


Assuntos
Doença das Coronárias/prevenção & controle , Política de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Prevenção Primária/legislação & jurisprudência , Causas de Morte , Doença das Coronárias/diagnóstico , Doença das Coronárias/mortalidade , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Estilo de Vida Saudável , Humanos , Formulação de Políticas , Prognóstico , Fatores de Proteção , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Comportamento de Redução do Risco , Federação Russa/epidemiologia , Fatores de Tempo
12.
Int J Health Policy Manag ; 6(2): 71-82, 2017 02 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28812782

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Government policy measures have a key role to play in the prevention and control of non-communicable diseases (NCDs). The Caribbean, a middle-income region, has the highest per capita burden of NCDs in the Americas. Our aim was to examine policy development and implementation between the years 2000 and 2013 on NCD prevention and control in Barbados, and to investigate factors promoting, and hindering, success. METHODS: A qualitative case study design was used involving a structured policy document review and semi-structured interviews with key informants, identified through stakeholder analysis and 'cascading.' Documents were abstracted into a standard form. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and underwent framework analysis, guided by the multiple streams framework (MSF). There were 25 key informants, from the Ministry of Health (MoH), other government Ministries, civil society organisations, and the private sector. RESULTS: A significant policy window opened between 2005 and 2007 in which new posts to address NCDs were created in the MoH, and a government supported multi-sectoral national NCD commission was established. Factors contributing to this government commitment and funding included a high level of awareness, throughout society, of the NCD burden, including media coverage of local research findings; the availability of policy recommendations by international bodies that could be adopted locally, notably the framework convention on tobacco control (FCTC); and the activities of local highly respected policy entrepreneurs with access to senior politicians, who were able to bring together political concern for the problem with potential policy solutions. However, factors were also identified that hindered multi-sectoral policy development in several areas, including around nutrition, physical activity, and alcohol. These included a lack of consensus (valence) on the nature of the problem, often framed as being predominantly one of individuals needing to take responsibility for their health rather than requiring government-led environmental changes; lack of appropriate detailed policy guidance for local adaptation; conflicts with other political priorities, such as production and export of alcohol, and political reluctance to use legislative and fiscal measures. CONCLUSION: The study's findings indicate mechanisms to promote and support NCD policy development in the Caribbean and similar settings.


Assuntos
Doença Crônica/prevenção & controle , Planejamento em Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Medicina Preventiva/legislação & jurisprudência , Prevenção Primária/legislação & jurisprudência , Barbados , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Programas Nacionais de Saúde , Formulação de Políticas , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde/organização & administração , Pesquisa Qualitativa
13.
New Solut ; 27(2): 176-188, 2017 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28514907

RESUMO

Currently, in some countries occupational health and safety policy and practice have a bias toward secondary prevention and workers' compensation rather than primary prevention. Particularly, in emerging economies, research has not adequately contributed to effective interventions and improvements in workers' health. This article, using South Africa as a case study, describes a methodology for identifying candidate fiscal policy interventions and describes the policy interventions selected for occupational health and safety. It is argued that fiscal policies are well placed to deal with complex intersectoral health problems and to focus efforts on primary prevention. A major challenge is the lack of empirical evidence to support the effectiveness of fiscal policies in improving workers' health. A second challenge is the underprioritization of occupational health and safety partly due to the relatively small burden of disease attributed to occupational exposures. Both challenges can and should be overcome by (i) conducting policy-relevant research to fill the empirical gaps and (ii) reconceptualizing, both for policy and research purposes, the role of work as a determinant of population health. Fiscal policies to prevent exposure to hazards at work have face validity and are thus appealing, not as a replacement for other efforts to improve health, but as part of a comprehensive effort toward prevention.


Assuntos
Política Fiscal , Saúde Ocupacional/legislação & jurisprudência , Prevenção Primária/legislação & jurisprudência , Indenização aos Trabalhadores , Humanos , Segurança , África do Sul
17.
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 108(5)2016 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26640244

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Affordable Care Act (ACA) removed copayments for screening mammography and colonoscopy in Medicare beneficiaries, but its clinical impact is unknown. METHODS: Using a 5% random sample of Medicare claims from 2009 through 2012 in individuals age 70 years or older who were due for screening, we examined claims for screening mammography and screening or surveillance colonoscopy for two years prior to ACA (2009-2010) and two years post-ACA (2011-2012). Receipt of the procedures at the patient level was compared across years using generalized estimating equations. Statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Compared with 2009, we found an increase in mammography uptake during the ACA coverage period, with multivariable odds ratios (MOR) of 1.22 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.20 to 1.25, P < .001) for 2011 and 1.17 (95% CI = 1.15 to 1.20, P < .001) for 2012 and less change in 2010 (OR = 1.03, 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.05, P = .01). In contrast to mammography, uptake of screening or surveillance colonoscopy decreased in 2012 (MOR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.92 to 0.98, P = .002) compared with 2009, with no change in 2010 (MOR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.99 to 1.04, P = .47) or 2011 (MOR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.99 to 1.04, P = .34). Other factors associated with procedure receipt included younger age and prior preventive health visits. In an analysis restricted to patients age 70 to 74 years, colonoscopy use increased slightly in 2011 but was unchanged in 2012, and the findings by year for mammography were consistent with the main analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Following ACA implementation with concomitant reduction in out-of-pocket expenditures, there was a statistically significant increment in mammography uptake but not colonoscopy. This suggests that affordability is a necessary but not sufficient facilitator of preventive services.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias do Colo/prevenção & controle , Colonoscopia/economia , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/economia , Mamografia/economia , Medicare , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Colonoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Mamografia/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare/economia , Medicare/legislação & jurisprudência , Medicare/tendências , Razão de Chances , Vigilância da População/métodos , Prevenção Primária/economia , Prevenção Primária/legislação & jurisprudência , Prevenção Primária/métodos , Estudos de Amostragem , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
18.
Rev Med Suisse ; 11(491): 1932-5, 2015 Oct 21.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26672258

RESUMO

The quality of the Swiss health system is unanimously recognised, except as regards prevention. Within the OECD, our country is among those that invest the least in this area. Despite overwhelming evidence of its usefulness for public health, in autumn 2012 Parliament rejected the draft federal law on prevention and health promotion. Alain Berset, Federal Councillor in charge of Health since January 2012, provides insight into this ambiguous situation.


Assuntos
Atenção à Saúde/normas , Prevenção Primária/legislação & jurisprudência , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Promoção da Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Saúde Pública , Suíça
19.
Lancet ; 384(9937): 75-82, 2014 Jul 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24993913

RESUMO

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, which was enacted by the US Congress in 2010, marks the greatest change in US health policy since the 1960s. The law is intended to address fundamental problems within the US health system, including the high and rising cost of care, inadequate access to health insurance and health services for many Americans, and low health-care efficiency and quality. By 2019, the law will bring health coverage--and the health benefits of insurance--to an estimated 25 million more Americans. It has already restrained discriminatory insurance practices, made coverage more affordable, and realised new provisions to curb costs (including tests of new health-care delivery models). The new law establishes the first National Prevention Strategy, adds substantial new funding for prevention and public health programmes, and promotes the use of recommended clinical preventive services and other measures, and thus represents a major opportunity for prevention and public health. The law also provides impetus for greater collaboration between the US health-care and public health systems, which have traditionally operated separately with little interaction. Taken together, the various effects of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act can advance the health of the US population.


Assuntos
Organizações de Assistência Responsáveis , Reforma dos Serviços de Saúde , Cobertura do Seguro , Seguro Saúde , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Saúde Pública , Organizações de Assistência Responsáveis/economia , Organizações de Assistência Responsáveis/organização & administração , Organizações de Assistência Responsáveis/tendências , Meio Ambiente , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Reforma dos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Reforma dos Serviços de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro/economia , Cobertura do Seguro/legislação & jurisprudência , Seguro Saúde/economia , Seguro Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Medicare/economia , Medicare/organização & administração , Medicare/tendências , Prevenção Primária/economia , Prevenção Primária/legislação & jurisprudência , Saúde Pública/economia , Saúde Pública/normas , Saúde Pública/tendências , Características de Residência , Estados Unidos
20.
Prog Cardiovasc Dis ; 56(5): 515-21, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24607016

RESUMO

In the Japanese workplace, employers are required to provide annual health checkups for workers in accordance with the "Industrial Safety and Health Law," which also mandates that an occupational physician be assigned to companies employing at least 50 workers. The annual medical examination includes testing for the early detection of cardiovascular risk factors such as hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, and the metabolic syndrome. This approach has successfully contributed to the extremely low incidence of coronary artery disease among Japanese workers. However, problems such as poor health and the low rate of participation in health checkups among small-scale companies still persist. Furthermore, although most wellness delivery systems in Japan employ strategies targeting high-risk individuals, instituting a strategy addressing the broader population irrespective of screening may be effective in reducing disease risk in the overall population. As a future direction, we should therefore develop practical methods for implementing a population strategy.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Atenção à Saúde , Promoção da Saúde , Serviços de Saúde do Trabalhador/métodos , Saúde Ocupacional , Prevenção Primária , Prevenção Secundária , Local de Trabalho , Doenças Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Atenção à Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Regulamentação Governamental , Política de Saúde , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Incidência , Japão/epidemiologia , Saúde Ocupacional/legislação & jurisprudência , Serviços de Saúde do Trabalhador/legislação & jurisprudência , Prevalência , Prevenção Primária/legislação & jurisprudência , Prognóstico , Desenvolvimento de Programas , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Comportamento de Redução do Risco , Prevenção Secundária/legislação & jurisprudência , Local de Trabalho/legislação & jurisprudência
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA