RESUMO
Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are one of the main causes of morbidity and disability worldwide. Due to modern methods of diagnosis and treatment, it is possible to protect patients with acute coronary syndromes from myocardial infarction as well from its early complications. However, the challenge remains to improve the long-term prognosis of CVDs. Analysis of body composition using the bioelectrical impedance (BIA) appears to be a good method for assessing changes in patients' organisms following various cardiac incidents, as well as those participating in rehabilitation programmes. This study aims to provide a complementary analysis of the scientific literature and a critical review of the data from the use of BIA to assess phase angle in people with a history of cardiac diseases. This critical literature review was prepared based on the Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review Articles recommendations. Inclusion criteria included 1) original publications of a research nature, 2) papers indexed in PubMed, Scopus, Embase databases, 3) full-text articles in English, 4) recent papers published between 2013-2023, 5) papers on the use of BIA with phase angle assessment as a prognostic factor in multiple aspects of health and disease, 6) papers showing changes in body composition in the process of cardiac rehabilitation. Based on a review of PubMed, Scopus and Embase databases, 36, 31 and 114 publications were found, respectively, chosen on the basis of precisely selected keywords and included for further full-text analysis. Exploring the role of the BIA holds lots of hope as a non-invasive method that can be used as a predictive marker for changes in the state of health in various fields of medicine. In young, healthy adults, BIA parameters may be important in identifying risk factors for the development of particular diseases, in predicting the rapid development of disease symptoms and in promoting motivation to lifestyle changes. Med Pr Work Health Saf. 2024;75(3):243-254.
Assuntos
Composição Corporal , Reabilitação Cardíaca , Doenças Cardiovasculares , Prevenção Primária , Prevenção Secundária , Humanos , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Prevenção Secundária/métodos , Impedância Elétrica , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) is a common health condition and the leading cause of years lived with disability worldwide. Most LBP episodes have a favourable prognosis, but recurrences within a year are common. Despite the individual and societal impact related to LBP recurrences, there is limited evidence on effective strategies for secondary prevention of LBP and successful implementation of intervention programmes in a real-world context. The aim of this study is to analyse the effectiveness of a tailored exercise and behavioural change programme (MyBack programme) in the secondary prevention of LBP; and evaluate acceptability, feasibility and determinants of implementation by the different stakeholders, as well as the implementation strategy of the MyBack programme in real context. METHODS: This protocol describes a hybrid type I, randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness and implementation of MyBack programme in the context of primary health care. The Behaviour Change Wheel framework and FITT-VP principles will inform the development of the behaviour change and exercise component of MyBack programme, respectively. Patients who have recently recovered from an episode of non-specific LBP will be randomly assigned to MyBack and usual care group or usual care group. The primary outcome will be the risk of LBP recurrence. The secondary outcomes will include disability, pain intensity, musculoskeletal health, and health-related quality of life. Participants will be followed monthly for 1 year. Costs data related to health care use and the MyBack programme will be also collected. Implementation outcomes will be assessed in parallel with the effectiveness study using qualitative methods (focus groups with participants and health providers) and quantitative data (study enrolment and participation data; participants adherence). DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, this is the first study assessing the effectiveness and implementation of a tailored exercise and behaviour change programme for prevention of LBP recurrences. Despite challenges related to hybrid design, it is expected that data on the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and implementation of the MyBack programme may contribute to improve health care in patients at risk of LBP recurrences, contributing to direct and indirect costs reduction for patients and the health system. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05841732.
Assuntos
Terapia por Exercício , Dor Lombar , Prevenção Secundária , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Análise Custo-Benefício , Terapia por Exercício/métodos , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Dor Lombar/prevenção & controle , Dor Lombar/terapia , Medição da Dor , Qualidade de Vida , Recidiva , Prevenção Secundária/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como AssuntoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Recurrence of low back pain is common and a substantial contributor to the disease and economic burden of low back pain. Exercise is recommended to prevent recurrence, but the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an accessible and low-cost intervention, such as walking, is yet to be established. We aimed to investigate the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an individualised, progressive walking and education intervention to prevent the recurrence of low back pain. METHODS: WalkBack was a two-armed, randomised controlled trial, which recruited adults (aged 18 years or older) from across Australia who had recently recovered from an episode of non-specific low back pain that was not attributed to a specific diagnosis, and which lasted for at least 24 h. Participants were randomly assigned to an individualised, progressive walking and education intervention facilitated by six sessions with a physiotherapist across 6 months or to a no treatment control group (1:1). The randomisation schedule comprised randomly permuted blocks of 4, 6, and 8 and was stratified by history of more than two previous episodes of low back pain and referral method. Physiotherapists and participants were not masked to allocation. Participants were followed for a minimum of 12 months and a maximum of 36 months, depending on the date of enrolment. The primary outcome was days to the first recurrence of an activity-limiting episode of low back pain, collected in the intention-to-treat population via monthly self-report. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated from the societal perspective and expressed as incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. The trial was prospectively registered (ACTRN12619001134112). FINDINGS: Between Sept 23, 2019, and June 10, 2022, 3206 potential participants were screened for eligibility, 2505 (78%) were excluded, and 701 were randomly assigned (351 to the intervention group and 350 to the no treatment control group). Most participants were female (565 [81%] of 701) and the mean age of participants was 54 years (SD 12). The intervention was effective in preventing an episode of activity-limiting low back pain (hazard ratio 0·72 [95% CI 0·60-0·85], p=0·0002). The median days to a recurrence was 208 days (95% CI 149-295) in the intervention group and 112 days (89-140) in the control group. The incremental cost per QALY gained was AU$7802, giving a 94% probability that the intervention was cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $28 000. Although the total number of participants experiencing at least one adverse event over 12 months was similar between the intervention and control groups (183 [52%] of 351 and 190 [54%] of 350, respectively, p=0·60), there was a greater number of adverse events related to the lower extremities in the intervention group than in the control group (100 in the intervention group and 54 in the control group). INTERPRETATION: An individualised, progressive walking and education intervention significantly reduced low back pain recurrence. This accessible, scalable, and safe intervention could affect how low back pain is managed. FUNDING: National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia.
Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício , Dor Lombar , Prevenção Secundária , Caminhada , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Austrália , Terapia por Exercício/economia , Terapia por Exercício/métodos , Dor Lombar/prevenção & controle , Dor Lombar/economia , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/métodos , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/economia , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Prevenção Secundária/economia , Prevenção Secundária/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento , IdosoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Providing secondary prevention through structured and comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation programmes to patients after a myocardial infarction (MI) reduces mortality and morbidity and improves health-related quality of life. Cardiac rehabilitation has the highest recommendation in current guidelines. While treatment target attainment rates at Swedish cardiac rehabilitation centres is among the highest in Europe, there are considerable differences in service delivery and variations in patient-level outcomes between centres. In this trial, we aim to study whether centre-level guideline adherence and patient-level outcomes across Swedish cardiac rehabilitation centres can be improved through a) regular audit and feedback of cardiac rehabilitation structure and processes through a national quality registry and b) supporting cardiac rehabilitation centres in implementing guidelines on secondary prevention. Furthermore, we aim to evaluate the implementation process and costs. METHODS: The study is an open-label cluster-randomized effectiveness-implementation hybrid trial including all 78 cardiac rehabilitation centres (attending to approximately 10 000 MI patients/year) that report to the SWEDEHEART registry. The centres will be randomized 1:1:1 to three clusters: 1) reporting cardiac rehabilitation structure and process variables to SWEDEHEART every six months (audit intervention) and being offered implementation support to implement guidelines on secondary prevention (implementation support intervention); 2) audit intervention only; or 3) no intervention offered. Baseline cardiac rehabilitation structure and process variables will be collected. The primary outcome is an adherence score measuring centre-level adherence to secondary prevention guidelines. Secondary outcomes include patient-level secondary prevention risk factor goal attainment at one-year after MI and major adverse coronary outcomes for up to five-years post-MI. Implementation outcomes include barriers and facilitators to guideline adherence evaluated using semi-structured focus-group interviews and relevant questionnaires, as well as costs and cost-effectiveness assessed by a comparative health economic evaluation. DISCUSSION: Optimizing cardiac rehabilitation centres' delivery of services to meet standards set in guidelines may lead to improvement in cardiovascular risk factors, including lifestyle factors, and ultimately a decrease in morbidity and mortality after MI. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov. Identifier: NCT05889416 . Registered 2023-03-23.
Assuntos
Reabilitação Cardíaca , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Infarto do Miocárdio , Humanos , Reabilitação Cardíaca/métodos , Ciência da Implementação , Infarto do Miocárdio/reabilitação , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Qualidade de Vida , Sistema de Registros , Prevenção Secundária/normas , Prevenção Secundária/métodos , Suécia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como AssuntoRESUMO
Atherosclerotic cardiovascular (CV) disease (ASCVD) prevention encompasses interventions across the lifecourse: from primordial to primary and secondary prevention. Primordial prevention begins in childhood and involves the promotion of ideal CV health (CVH) via optimizing physical activity, body mass index, blood glucose levels, total cholesterol levels, blood pressure, and sleep while minimizing tobacco use. Primary and secondary prevention of ASCVD thereafter centers around mitigating ASCVD risk factors via medical therapy and lifestyle interventions. Disparities in optimal preventive efforts exist among historically marginalized groups in each of these three prongs of ASCVD prevention. Children and adults with a high burden of social determinants of health also face inequity in preventive measures. Inadequate screening, risk factor management and prescription of preventive therapeutics permeate the care of certain groups, especially women, Black, and Hispanic individuals in the United States. Beyond this, individuals belonging to historically marginalized groups also are much more likely to experience other ASCVD risk-enhancing factors, placing them at higher risk for ASCVD over their lifetime. These disparities translate to worse outcomes, with higher rates of ASCVD and CV mortality among these groups. Possible solutions to promoting equity involve community-based youth lifestyle interventions, improved risk-factor screening, and increasing accessibility to healthcare resources and novel preventive diagnostics and therapeutics.
Assuntos
Aterosclerose , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Humanos , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/etnologia , Aterosclerose/prevenção & controle , Aterosclerose/epidemiologia , Aterosclerose/terapia , Aterosclerose/etnologia , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde , Medição de Risco , Prevenção Primária , Fatores de Risco de Doenças Cardíacas , Prevenção Secundária/métodos , Comportamento de Redução do Risco , Fatores de Risco , Feminino , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde , Masculino , Estilo de Vida Saudável , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains an important cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Critical elements of improving outcomes in ACS patients include timely access to acute care including prompt revascularization if indicated, and subsequent ongoing secondary prevention and risk factor modification, ideally with cardiovascular specialists. It is being increasingly realized that ACS patients from rural settings suffer from inferior outcomes compared to their urban counterparts due to factors such as delayed diagnosis, delayed access to acute care, and less accessibility to specialized follow up. This narrative review will examine the importance of timely access to care in ACS patients, particularly in ST-elevation myocardial infarction; how barriers in access to care affects outcomes in various rural populations; and strategies that have been shown to improve such access, and therefore hopefully achieve more equitable health outcomes compared to patients who live in urban settings.
Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , População Rural , Humanos , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/terapia , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/epidemiologia , População Urbana , Prevenção Secundária/métodos , Prevenção Secundária/organização & administração , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
AIMS: Diabetes-related foot ulcers are common, costly, and frequently recur. Multiple interventions help prevent these ulcers. However, none of these have been prospectively investigated for cost-effectiveness. Our aim was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of at-home skin temperature monitoring to help prevent diabetes-related foot ulcer recurrence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Multicenter randomized controlled trial. We randomized 304 persons at high diabetes-related foot ulcer risk to either usual foot care plus daily at-home foot skin temperature monitoring (intervention) or usual care alone (control). Primary outcome was cost-effectiveness based on foot care costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) during 18 months follow-up. Foot care costs included costs for ulcer prevention (e.g., footwear, podiatry) and for ulcer treatment when required (e.g., consultation, hospitalisation, amputation). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated for intervention versus usual care using probabilistic sensitivity analysis for willingness-to-pay/accept levels up to 100,000. RESULTS: The intervention had a 45% probability of being cost-effective at a willingness-to-accept of 50,000 per QALY lost. This resulted from (non-significantly) lower foot care costs in the intervention group (6067 vs. 7376; p = 0.45) because of (significantly) fewer participants with ulcer recurrence(s) in 18 months (36% vs. 47%; p = 0.045); however, QALYs were (non-significantly) lower in the intervention group (1.09 vs. 1.12; p = 0.35), especially in those without foot ulcer recurrence (1.09 vs. 1.17; p = 0.10). CONCLUSIONS: At-home skin temperature monitoring for diabetes-related foot ulcer prevention compared with usual care is at best equally cost-effective. The intervention resulted in cost-savings due to preventing foot ulcer recurrence and related costs, but this came at the expense of QALY loss, potentially from self-monitoring burdens.
Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício , Pé Diabético , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Humanos , Pé Diabético/prevenção & controle , Pé Diabético/economia , Pé Diabético/etiologia , Pé Diabético/terapia , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Seguimentos , Idoso , Temperatura Cutânea , Recidiva , Prevenção Secundária/economia , Prevenção Secundária/métodos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/economia , Prognóstico , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The cost of secondary prevention of coronary heart disease (CHD) is continuing to increase, with a substantial portion of this acceleration being driven by the expense of confirmatory diagnostic testing. Conceivably, newly developed precision epigenetic technologies could drive down these costs. However, at the current time, their impact on overall expense for CHD care is poorly understood. We hypothesized that the use of a newly developed, highly sensitive, and specific epigenetic test, PrecisionCHD, could decrease the costs of secondary prevention. METHODS: To test this hypothesis, we constructed a budget impact analysis using a cost calculation model that examined the effects of substituting PrecisionCHD for conventional CHD diagnostic tests on the expenses of the initial evaluation and first year of care of stable CHD using a 1-year time horizon with no discounting. RESULTS: The model projected that for a commercial insurer with one million members, full adoption of PrecisionCHD as the primary method of initial CHD assessment would save approximately $113.6 million dollars in the initial year. CONCLUSION: These analyses support the use of precision epigenetic methods as part of the initial diagnosis and care of stable CHD and can meaningfully reduce cost. Real-world pilots to test the reliability of these analyses are indicated.
Assuntos
Doença das Coronárias , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Doença das Coronárias/diagnóstico , Doença das Coronárias/economia , Doença das Coronárias/genética , Epigênese Genética , Prevenção Secundária/economia , Prevenção Secundária/métodos , Epigenômica/economia , Epigenômica/métodos , Medicina de Precisão/economia , Medicina de Precisão/métodos , Análise Custo-BenefícioRESUMO
Objectives Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) provides evidence-based secondary prevention for people with heart disease (HD) (clients). Despite HD being the leading cause of mortality and morbidity, CR is under-utilised in Australia. This research investigated healthcare systems required to improve access to CR in rural and remote areas of North Queensland (NQ). Methods A qualitatively dominant case study series to review management systems for CR in rural and remote areas of NQ was undertaken. Data collection was via semi-structured interviews in four tertiary hospitals and four rural or remote communities. An audit of discharge planning and CR referral, plus a review of community-based health services, was completed. An iterative and co-design process including consultation with healthcare staff and community members culminated in a systems-based model for improving access to CR in rural and remote areas. Results Poorly organised CR systems, poor client/staff understanding of discharge planning and low referral rates for secondary prevention, resulted in the majority of clients not accessing secondary prevention, despite resources being available. Revised health systems and management processes were recommended for the proposed Heart: Road to health model, and given common chronic diseases risk factors it was recommended to be broadened into Chronic disease: Road to health . Conclusion A Chronic disease: Road to health model could provide effective and efficient secondary prevention for people with chronic diseases in rural and remote areas. It is proposed that this approach could reduce gaps and duplication in current healthcare services and provide flexible, client-centred, holistic, culturally responsive services, and improve client outcomes.
Assuntos
Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Serviços de Saúde Rural , Prevenção Secundária , Humanos , Queensland/epidemiologia , Prevenção Secundária/métodos , Doença Crônica/prevenção & controle , Serviços de Saúde Rural/organização & administração , Entrevistas como Assunto , População Rural , Reabilitação Cardíaca/métodos , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Cardiopatias/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Modelos Organizacionais , MasculinoRESUMO
PURPOSE: Guidelines recommend low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) for patients with cancer-associated thrombosis. However, until recently, only dalteparin and tinzaparin were approved in the European Economic Area (EEA) for these patients. This study compares the benefit-risk profile of enoxaparin with dalteparin and tinzaparin for the extended treatment of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), and prevention of recurrence in adult patients with active cancer. METHODS: A semi-quantitative structured benefit-risk assessment was conducted for the label-extension application of enoxaparin based on the benefit-risk action team descriptive framework: define decision context; determine key benefit and risk outcomes; identify data sources; extract data; interpret results. RESULTS: The key benefits were defined as reduced all-cause mortality and venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence (including symptomatic DVT, fatal PE or non-fatal PE); the key risks were major and non-major bleeding of clinical significance, and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Enoxaparin demonstrated comparable effects for the reduction of VTE recurrence and all-cause mortality versus other EEA-approved LMWHs (dalteparin, tinzaparin). There was no evidence of a significant difference between enoxaparin and the comparator groups with regard to incidence of major and non-major bleeding. The data on HIT were too limited to assess the difference between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The assessment demonstrated a favourable benefit-risk profile for enoxaparin similar to that of other EEA-approved LMWHs for the treatment of DVT and PE and the prevention of recurrence in patients with active cancer and thus supported the label-extension approval.
Assuntos
Dalteparina , Enoxaparina , Heparina de Baixo Peso Molecular , Neoplasias , Embolia Pulmonar , Tinzaparina , Trombose Venosa , Humanos , Enoxaparina/administração & dosagem , Enoxaparina/efeitos adversos , Enoxaparina/uso terapêutico , Embolia Pulmonar/prevenção & controle , Embolia Pulmonar/tratamento farmacológico , Trombose Venosa/prevenção & controle , Trombose Venosa/tratamento farmacológico , Medição de Risco , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias/complicações , Dalteparina/administração & dosagem , Dalteparina/efeitos adversos , Dalteparina/uso terapêutico , Tinzaparina/administração & dosagem , Tinzaparina/uso terapêutico , Heparina de Baixo Peso Molecular/administração & dosagem , Heparina de Baixo Peso Molecular/efeitos adversos , Heparina de Baixo Peso Molecular/uso terapêutico , Anticoagulantes/administração & dosagem , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Prevenção Secundária/métodos , Hemorragia/induzido quimicamente , AdultoRESUMO
RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Data supporting the efficacy of preventive pharmacological therapy (PPT) to reduce urolithiasis recurrence are based on clinical trials with composite outcomes that incorporate imaging findings and have uncertain clinical significance. This study evaluated whether the use of PPT leads to fewer symptomatic stone events. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Medicare enrollees with urolithiasis who completed 24-hour urine collections that revealed hypercalciuria, hypocitraturia, low urine pH, or hyperuricosuria. EXPOSURE: PPT (thiazide diuretics for hypercalciuria, alkali for hypocitraturia or low urine pH, or uric acid lowering drugs for hyperuricosuria) categorized as (1) adherent to guideline-concordant PPT, (2) nonadherent to guideline-concordant PPT, or (3) untreated. OUTCOME: Symptomatic stone event occurrence (emergency department [ED] visit or hospitalization for urolithiasis or stone-directed surgery). ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: Among 13,942 patients, 31.0% were prescribed PPT. Compared with no treatment, concordant/adherent PPT use was associated with a significantly lower hazard of symptomatic stone events for patients with hypercalciuria (HR, 0.736 [95% CI, 0.593-0.915]) and low urine pH (HR, 0.804 [95% CI, 0.650-0.996]) but not for patients with hypocitraturia or hyperuricosuria. These associations were largely driven by significantly lower rates of ED visits after initiating PPT among the concordant/adherent group versus untreated patients. Patients with hypercalciuria had adjusted 2-year predicted probabilities of a visit of 3.8% [95% CI, 2.5%-5.2%%] and 6.9% [95% CI, 6.0%-7.7%] for the concordant/adherent PPT and no-treatment groups, respectively. Among patients with low urine pH, these probabilities were 4.3% (95% CI, 2.9%-5.7%) and 7.3% (95% CI, 6.5%-8.0%) for the concordant/adherent PPT and no-treatment groups, respectively. LIMITATIONS: Potential bias from the possibility that patients prescribed PPT had more severe disease than untreated patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with urolithiasis and hypercalciuria who were adherent to treatment with thiazide diuretics as well as those with low urine pH adherent to prescribed alkali therapy had fewer symptomatic stone events than untreated patients. PLAIN-LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Despite multiple clinical trials demonstrating the efficacy of thiazide diuretics and alkali for secondary prevention of kidney stones, they are infrequently prescribed due in part to a lack of data about their effectiveness in real-world settings. We analyzed medical claims from older adults with kidney stones for whom urine chemistry data were available. We found that patients who took prescribed thiazide diuretics for elevated urine calcium levels or alkali for low urinary pH were less likely to experience symptomatic stone recurrences than untreated patients. This benefit was expressed as lower rates of emergency department visits after initiating therapy. Our findings should inform the prescription of and adherence to treatment with thiazide diuretics and alkali for the prevention of recurrent kidney stones.
Assuntos
Urolitíase , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Feminino , Masculino , Idoso , Urolitíase/prevenção & controle , Inibidores de Simportadores de Cloreto de Sódio/uso terapêutico , Estudos de Coortes , Prevenção Secundária/métodos , Hipercalciúria/prevenção & controle , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , MedicareRESUMO
O acidente vascular cerebral (AVC) é a maior causa de incapacidade em todo mundo, e atualmente é também considerado como a segunda maior causa de morte no Brasil. O AVC isquêmico é o subtipo mais comum e pode ser subdividido etiologicamente em car-dioembólico, aterosclerótico de grandes ou pequenas artérias (lacunas), criptogênico ou de outras etiologias. Dependendo da etiologia encontrada, a profilaxia secundária de novos eventos deve ser feita através de medicações antitrombóticas específicas. Portanto, investigar adequadamente a etiologia do evento vascular isquêmico é fundamental para a instituição da profilaxia secundária apropriada. A terapia antitrombótica pós-AVC isquêmico evoluiu consideravelmente na última década. Especificamente para pacientes com AVC e fibrilação atrial, a incorporação de anticoagulantes de ação direta à prática clínica representa um grande avanço, já que tais medicações são mais eficazes e seguras para o tratamento de pacientes de alto risco. No presente artigo, discutiremos o uso de antitrombóticos em pacientes com AVC em diferentes momentos pós-icto vascular e nas distintas etiologias possíveis
Stroke is the leading cause of disability worldwide, and is currently also considered the second leading cause of death in Brazil. Ischemic stroke is the most common subtype and can be subdivided etiologically into cardioembolic, atherosclerotic (large artery atherosclero-sis or small vessel disease-lacunae), cryptogenic or strokes of other etiologies. Depending on the etiology, secondary prophylaxis of new events should be undertaken with specific antithrombotic medications. Therefore, a thorough investigation of ischemic vascular event etiology is essential for the introduction of appropriate secondary prophylaxis. Antithrombotic therapy after ischemic stroke has evolved considerably in the last decade. The incorporation of direct-acting anticoagulants into clinical practice represents a major advance, particularly for stroke and atrial fibrillation patients, since such medications are safer and more effective for the treatment of high-risk patients. In this article, we will discuss the use of antithrombo-tics in stroke patients at different post-stroke stages and in the distinct possible etiologies
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Terapia Trombolítica/métodos , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/fisiopatologia , Prevenção de Doenças , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico , Infarto Cerebral/diagnóstico , Aspirina/uso terapêutico , Fatores de Risco , Diabetes Mellitus , Prevenção Secundária/métodos , Comportamento Sedentário , Rivaroxabana/uso terapêutico , Hipertensão , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
Estudo ecológico que analisou a proporção da realização de mamografia e do exame de Papanicolaou e a associação destes com o Índice de Desenvolvimento Humano (IDH), nas 26 capitais brasileiras e Distrito Federal, em 2011, com dados do VIGITEL. A proporção de mamografia em algum momento da vida esteve acima de 70% para todas as capitais estudadas. Entretanto, poucas capitais atingiram a meta de 80% para o Papanicolaou, tanto para a realização em algum momento da vida como nos últimos três anos. Houve forte correlação positiva entre IDH e as proporções desses exames (r = 0,52 e 0,66 para realização de mamografia em algum momento da vida e nos últimos dois anos e r = 0,66 e 0,71 para realização do Papanicolaou em algum momento da vida e nos últimos três anos, respectivamente). A razão de prevalência de mamografia nos últimos dois anos foi 1,06 (IC95%: 1,01-1,10) e para o Papanicolaou nos últimos três anos foi 1,07 (IC95%: 1,04-1,10). A promoção de políticas públicas que incentivem o desenvolvimento socioeconômico das cidades brasileiras favoreceria o aumento da cobertura desses exames.
This ecological study assessed mammography and Papanicolaou test (Pap smear) screening rates and their association with the Human Development Index (HDI) in Brazilian state capitals and Federal District in 2011, based on VIGITEL telephone survey data. More than 70% of women had a mammogram some time in life in all the state capitals, while the Pap smear rates any time in life and in the previous three years fell short of the 80% target in most state capitals. There was a strong positive correlation between HDI and the test rates (r = 0.52 and 0.66 for mammogram any time in life and in the previous two years and r = 0.66 and 0.71 for Pap smear any time in life and in the previous three years, respectively). Prevalence ratio (PR) for mammogram in the previous two years was 1.06 (95%CI: 1.01-1.10) and PR for Pap smear in the previous three years was 1.07 (IC95%: 1.04-1.10). The promotion of public health policies that encourage Brazil’s urban economic and social development should help increase coverage for these tests.
Estudio ecológico que examinó la proporción de realización de mamografías y citologías, y su asociación con el Índice de Desarrollo Humano (IDH) en 26 capitales de Brasil y el Distrito Federal, en 2011 (datos del VIGITEL). La proporción de mamografía en algún momento de la vida fue superior al 70% para todas las capitales, y pocas han alcanzado un 80% en el caso de la citología, en algún momento de la vida, así como en los últimos tres años. Hubo una fuerte correlación positiva entre el IDH y las proporciones de estas pruebas (r = 0,52 y 0,66 para la realización de la mamografía en algún momento de la vida y los últimos dos años y r = 0,66 y 0,71 para contar con una citología en algún momento de la vida y en los últimos tres años, respectivamente). La razón de prevalencia de la mamografía en los últimos dos años fue de un 1,06 (IC95%: 1,01-1,10) y para la citología -en los últimos tres años- fue de un 1,07 (IC95%: 1,04-1,10). El impulso de políticas públicas que promuevan el desarrollo económico y social de las ciudades brasileñas podría mejorar la cobertura de estos exámenes.
Assuntos
Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Mama/prevenção & controle , Mamografia/estatística & dados numéricos , Programas de Rastreamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Teste de Papanicolaou , Prevenção Secundária/métodos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/prevenção & controle , Esfregaço Vaginal/estatística & dados numéricos , Brasil , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
Background: In 2005, acute myocardial infarction (AMI) was included in a universal health plan (GES) to reduce inequity in care and optimize its diagnosis and treatment. Aim: To evaluate the effect of GES in risk factor control and therapeutic management among patients with AMI. Material and Methods: A survey was conducted in 2008-2009 in six public hospitals. Patients were identified from a hospital based registry of AMI and evaluated one year later with laboratory tests and an interview. Results: The registry enrolled 534 patients with ST and non ST segment elevation myocardial infarction. Of these, 416 patients aged 63 ± 12 years (25% women) were evaluated one year later. Eighty three percent were evaluated by a cardiologist and 37% by a general practitioner. Twenty two percent were evaluated by a nurse and 22% by a nutritionist. At the moment of the interview, 9% smoked, 78% were overweight or obese, 24% performed moderate or vigorous physical activity ≥ 150 min/week, 60% had systolic pressure > 130 mmHg and 63% a diastolic pressure > 80 mmHg. In 30%, LDL cholesterol was > 100 mg/dl and in 43%, triglycerides were > 150 mm/dl. Twenty two percent were diabetic and among them, 52% had a glycosilated hemoglobin > 7%. Forty five percent of non-diabetic patients had a fasting glucose > 100 mg/dl. Ninety three percent were in treatment with aspirin, 86% with statins, 66% with b-blockers, and 73% with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers and 20% with clopidogrel. Conclusions: Despite the high proportion of patients in treatment with evidence-based therapy, many do not achieve the targets for risk factor control with the new health care model.