Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 109
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Surgery ; 176(1): 172-179, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38729887

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Prior literature has reported inferior surgical outcomes and reduced access to minimally invasive procedures at safety-net hospitals. However, this relationship has not yet been elucidated for elective colectomy. We sought to characterize the association between safety-net hospitals and likelihood of minimally invasive resection, perioperative outcomes, and costs. METHODS: All adult (≥18 years) hospitalization records entailing elective colectomy were identified in the 2016-2020 National Inpatient Sample. Centers in the top quartile of safety-net burden were considered safety-net hospitals (others: non-safety-net hospitals). Multivariable regression models were developed to assess the impact of safety-net hospitals status on key outcomes. RESULTS: Of ∼532,640 patients, 95,570 (17.9%) were treated at safety-net hospitals. The safety-net hospitals cohort was younger and more often of Black race or Hispanic ethnicity. After adjustment, care at safety-net hospitals remained independently associated with reduced odds of minimally invasive surgery (adjusted odds ratio 0.92; 95% confidence interval 0.87-0.97). The interaction between safety-net hospital status and race was significant, such that Black race remained linked with lower odds of minimally invasive surgery at safety-net hospitals (reference: White race). Additionally, safety-net hospitals was associated with greater likelihood of in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio 1.34, confidence interval 1.04-1.74) and any perioperative complication (adjusted odds ratio 1.15, confidence interval 1.08-1.22), as well as increased length of stay (ß+0.26 days, confidence interval 0.17-0.35) and costs (ß+$2,510, confidence interval 2,020-3,000). CONCLUSION: Care at safety-net hospitals was linked with lower odds of minimally invasive colectomy, as well as greater complications and costs. Black patients treated at safety-net hospitals demonstrated reduced likelihood of minimally invasive surgery, relative to White patients. Further investigation is needed to elucidate the root causes of these disparities in care.


Assuntos
Colectomia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos , Provedores de Redes de Segurança , Humanos , Colectomia/métodos , Colectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Colectomia/economia , Provedores de Redes de Segurança/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Adulto , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto Jovem , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Adolescente
2.
Urology ; 189: 41-48, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38670274

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To analyze temporal trends and costs associated with the use of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for kidney cancer in the US over the past decade. To examine the impact of social determinants of health (SDOH) on perioperative outcomes. METHODS: The PearlDiver Mariner, a national database of insurance billing records, was queried for this retrospective observational cohort analysis. The MIS population was identified and stratified according to treatment modality, using International Classification of Diseases and current procedural terminology codes. SDOH were assessed using International Classification of Diseases codes. Negative binomial regression was used to evaluate the overall number of renal MIS and Cochran-Armitage tests to compare the utilization of different treatment modalities, over the study period. Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified predictors of perioperative complications. RESULTS: A total of 80,821 MIS for kidney cancer were included. Minimally invasive partial nephrectomy adoption as a fraction of total MIS increased significantly (slope of regression line, reg. = 0.026, P <.001). Minimally invasive radical nephrectomy ($26.9k ± 40.9k) and renal ablation ($18.9k ± 31.6k) were the most expensive and cheapest procedures, respectively. No statistically significant difference was observed in terms of number of complications (P = .06) and presence of SDOH (P = .07) among the treatment groups. At multivariable analysis, patients with SDOH undergoing minimally invasive radical nephrectomy had higher odds of perioperative complications, while renal ablation had a significantly lower probability of perioperative complications. CONCLUSION: This study describes the current management of kidney cancer in the US, offering a socioeconomic perspective on the impact of this disease in everyday clinical practice.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Renais , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos , Nefrectomia , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Renais/economia , Estados Unidos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Feminino , Masculino , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/tendências , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nefrectomia/economia , Nefrectomia/métodos , Nefrectomia/tendências , Idoso
3.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 31(6): 518-524, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38527702

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Fellowship program directors (FPDs) play an important role in the development of fellows and learners, but little is known about their demographics. This cross-sectional study aims to examine the characteristics of minimally invasive gynecologic surgery (MIGS) FPDs. DESIGN: A retrospective cross-sectional study. SETTING: Data obtained from publicly available information on official websites of the program directors studied. SUBJECTS: MIGS fellowship program directors. INTERVENTIONS: All US-based MIGS programs affiliated with the AAGL in 2023 were included. Information about FPD gender, medical school attended and graduation year, residency program attended and graduation year, any additional graduate degrees earned, fellowship programs completed, and the year of their appointment as FPD was collected through publicly available sources. Scholarly activity was measured by peer-reviewed articles and the Hirsch index. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of the 54 FPDs, 28 (51.85%) were female and 26 (48.15%) were male. Male FPDs were significantly older (54.6 ± 8.7 years) than female FPDs (46.2 ± 5.0 years), p <.05. Average age at appointment was 43.1 ± 6.7 years, with female FPDs being appointed at significantly younger ages (39.4 ± 5.1 years) compared to male FPDs (44.5 ± 6.8 years), p <.05. Male FPDs had statistically significant higher Hirsch indices (14 ± 11.4) compared to female FPDs (8 ± 5.8), p <.05. Of the FPDs who completed a fellowship, 27 (50%) did so in MIGS, eight (14.81%) in Gynecologic-Oncology, 6 (11.11%) in Urogynecology, and 4 (7.41%) in Reproductive Endocrinology/Infertility. CONCLUSIONS: MIGS fellowships have a uniquely equal representation of male and female FPDs, as surgical subspecialties historically tend to be male dominant. Notably, there is diversity in the type of fellowship pursued by MIGS FPDs, with nearly half of FPDs completing a fellowship outside of MIGS. The reasons for differences in scholarly contributions, indicated by Hirsch index, of male versus female FPDs is unclear.


Assuntos
Bolsas de Estudo , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos , Humanos , Feminino , Bolsas de Estudo/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/educação , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos Transversais , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estados Unidos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/educação , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Internato e Residência , Ginecologia/educação
4.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 31(5): 414-422, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38325584

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To study racial and ethnic disparities in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery (MIGS). DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Online review of all published MIGS RCTs in high-impact journals from 2012 to 2023. PATIENTS: Journals included all first quartile obstetrics and gynecology journals, as well as The New England Journal of Medicine, The Lancet, The British Medical Journal, and The Journal of the American Medical Association. The National Institutes of Health's PubMed and the ClinicalTrials.gov websites were queried using the following search terms from the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology's certifying examination bulletin 2022 to obtain relevant trials: adenomyosis, adnexal surgery, abnormal uterine bleeding, cystectomy, endometriosis, fibroids, gynecology, hysterectomy, hysteroscopy, laparoscopy, leiomyoma, minimally invasive gynecology, myomectomy, ovarian cyst, and robotic surgery. INTERVENTIONS: The US Census Bureau data were used to estimate the expected number of participants. We calculated the enrollment ratio (ER) of actual to expected participants for US trials with available race and ethnicity data. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 352 RCTs were identified. Of these, race and/or ethnicity data were available in 65 studies (18.5%). We analyzed the 46 studies that originated in the United States, with a total of 4645 participants. Of these RCTs, only 8 (17.4%) reported ethnicity in addition to race. When comparing published RCT data with expected proportions of participants, White participants were overrepresented (70.8% vs. 59.6%; ER, 1.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.52-1.81), as well as Black or African American participants (15.4% vs. 13.7%; ER, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.03-1.29). Hispanic (6.7% vs. 19.0%; ER, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.27-0.35), Asian (1.7% vs. 6.1%; ER, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.20-0.34), Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander (0.1% vs. 0.3%; ER, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.06-0.74), and Indian or Alaska Native participants (0.2% vs. 1.3%; ER, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.08-0.32) were underrepresented. When comparing race/ethnicity proportions in the 20 states where the RCTs were conducted, Black or African American participants were underrepresented. CONCLUSION: In MIGS RCTs conducted in the United States, White and Black or African American participants are overrepresented compared with other races, and ethnicity is characterized in fewer than one-fifth of trials. Efforts should be made to improve racial and ethnic recruitment equity and reporting in future MIGS RCTs.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Transversais , Etnicidade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/métodos , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/etnologia , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Estados Unidos , Grupos Raciais
5.
Int J Gynecol Cancer ; 33(12): 1875-1881, 2023 Dec 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37903564

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine our institutional rate of venous thromboembolism (VTE) following minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer and to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of extended prophylactic anticoagulation after minimally invasive staging surgery for endometrial cancer. METHODS: All patients with newly diagnosed endometrial cancer who underwent minimally invasive staging surgery from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2020 were identified retrospectively, and clinicopathologic and outcome data were obtained through chart review. Event probabilities and utility decrements were obtained through published clinical data and literature review. A decision model was created to compare 28 days of no post-operative pharmacologic prophylaxis, prophylactic enoxaparin, and prophylactic apixaban. Outcomes included no complications, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism, clinically relevant non-major bleeding, and major bleeding. We assumed a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. RESULTS: Three of 844 patients (0.36%) had a VTE following minimally invasive staging surgery for endometrial cancer. In this model, no pharmacologic prophylaxis was less costly and more effective than prophylactic apixaban and prophylactic enoxaparin over all parameters examined. When all patients were assigned prophylaxis, prophylactic apixaban was both less costly and more effective than prophylactic enoxaparin. If the risk of DVT was ≥4.8%, prophylactic apixaban was favored over no pharmacologic prophylaxis. On Monte Carlo probabilistic sensitivity analysis for the base case scenario, no pharmacologic prophylaxis was favored in 41.1% of iterations at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000 per QALY. CONCLUSIONS: In this cost-effectiveness model, no extended pharmacologic anticoagulation was superior to extended prophylactic enoxaparin and apixaban in clinically early-stage endometrial cancer patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery. This model supports use of prophylactic apixaban for 7 days post-operatively in select patients when the risk of DVT is 4.8% or higher.


Assuntos
Anticoagulantes , Análise Custo-Benefício , Neoplasias do Endométrio , Histerectomia , Tromboembolia Venosa , Feminino , Humanos , Anticoagulantes/administração & dosagem , Anticoagulantes/economia , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Quimioprevenção/economia , Quimioprevenção/métodos , Quimioprevenção/estatística & dados numéricos , Análise de Custo-Efetividade , Neoplasias do Endométrio/patologia , Neoplasias do Endométrio/cirurgia , Enoxaparina/administração & dosagem , Enoxaparina/economia , Enoxaparina/uso terapêutico , Histerectomia/efeitos adversos , Histerectomia/economia , Histerectomia/métodos , Histerectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiologia , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiologia , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevenção & controle
6.
Rev. chil. endocrinol. diabetes ; 15(3): 98-103, 2022. tab, ilus
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS | ID: biblio-1392425

RESUMO

INTRODUCCIÓN: En el hiperparatiroidismo primario el origen del trastorno, como su nombre lo indica, está en la propia glándula paratiroides, la cual genera una secreción autónoma y excesiva. La cirugía de las glándulas paratiroides evolucionó en forma considerable en los últimos 30 a 40 años, pasamos de exploraciones cervicales exhaustivas, hasta una época en que gracias al desarrollo tecnológico y sobre todo medicina nuclear, podemos localizar en forma preoperatoria el tejido patológico; siendo esta a su vez la base fundamental en la realización de procedimientos más selectivos. OBJETIVO: mostrar la casuística de cirugía por mini abordaje de la glándula paratiroides en el hiperparatiroidismo primario en un centro mutual de Montevideo. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Realizamos un estudio observacional descriptivo y retrospectivo. Se estudió una muestra de 18 pacientes con diagnóstico de hiperparatiroidismo primario y con sospecha de lesión única los cuales fueron intervenidos en un centro mutual de la ciudad de Montevideo entro julio de 2017 y enero de 2020. CONCLUSIÓN: La cirugía por mini abordaje de la glándula paratiroides puede ser aplicada en el hiperparatiroidismo primario en pacientes seleccionados con las ventajas de; tener un menor tiempo quirúrgico, ser ambulatoria (reintegro al hogar en pocas horas), indemnidad de la logia tiroidea contralateral, mejor resultado estético con similar tasa de éxito que la cirugía convencional.


BACKGROUND: In primary hyperparathyroidism, the origin of the disorder, as its name indicates, is in the parathyroid gland itself, which generates excessive and autonomous secretion. Parathyroid gland surgery has evolved dramatically in the last 30 to 40 years, from exhaustive cervical examinations, to nowadays when, thanks to technological development and especially nuclear medicine, we can locate pathological tissue preoperatively; this, in fact, is the fundamental basis for the performance of more selective procedures. OBJECTIVE: to show the casuistry of mini-approach surgery of the parathyroid gland in primary hyperparathyroidism in a mutual center in Montevideo. METHODS: We carried out a descriptive and retrospective observational study. We studied a sample of 18 patients diagnosed with primary hyperparathyroidism and a single suspicious lesion, who underwent surgery in a private center in the city of Montevideo from July 2017 to January 2020. CONCLUSION: Mini-approach surgery of the parathyroid gland can be applied in primary hyperparathyroidism in selected patients, with the advantages of a shorter surgical time, ambulatory (return home in a few hours), keeping the indemnity of the contralateral thyroid loggia, a better cosmetic result with a similar success rate than conventional surgery.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Hiperparatireoidismo Primário/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Estudos Retrospectivos , Distribuição por Sexo , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação
7.
Obstet Gynecol ; 138(2): 208-217, 2021 08 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34237769

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To examine access to high-volume surgeons in comparison with low-volume surgeons who perform hysterectomies within high-volume hospitals and to compare perioperative morbidity and mortality between high-volume and low-volume surgeons within these centers. METHODS: Women who underwent hysterectomy in New York State between 2000 and 2014 at a high-volume (top quartile by volume) hospital were included. Surgeons were classified into quartiles based on average annual hysterectomy volume. Multivariable models were used to determine characteristics associated with treatment by a low-volume surgeon in comparison with a high-volume surgeon and to estimate the association between physician volume, and morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 300,586 patients cared for by 5,505 surgeons at 59 hospitals were identified. Women treated by low-volume surgeons, in comparison with high-volume surgeons, were more often Black (19.4% vs 14.3%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.26; 95% CI 1.09-1.46) and had Medicare insurance (20.6% vs 14.5%; aOR 1.22; 95% CI 1.04-1.42). Low-volume surgeons were more likely to perform both emergent-urgent procedures (26.1% vs 6.4%; aOR 3.91; 95% CI 3.26-4.69) and abdominal hysterectomy, compared with minimally invasive hysterectomy (77.8% vs 54.7%; aOR 1.91; 95% CI 1.62-2.24). Compared with patients cared for by high-volume surgeons, those operated on by low-volume surgeons had increased risk of a complication (31.0% vs 10.3%; adjusted risk ratios [aRR] 1.84; 95% CI 1.71-1.98) and mortality (2.2% vs 0.2%; aRR 3.04; 95% CI 2.20-4.21). In sensitivity analyses, differences in morbidity and mortality remained for emergent-urgent procedures, elective operations, cancer surgery, and noncancer procedures. CONCLUSION: Socioeconomic disparities remain in access to high-volume surgeons within high-volume hospitals for hysterectomy. Patients who undergo hysterectomy at a high-volume hospital by a low-volume surgeon are at substantially greater risk for perioperative morbidity and mortality.


Assuntos
Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais com Alto Volume de Atendimentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Histerectomia/mortalidade , Histerectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Cirurgiões/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , População Negra , Feminino , Humanos , Histerectomia/métodos , Complicações Intraoperatórias/epidemiologia , Medicare , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/estatística & dados numéricos , New York/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estados Unidos
8.
Int J Gynecol Cancer ; 31(5): 686-693, 2021 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33727220

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate trends in outpatient versus inpatient hysterectomy for endometrial cancer and assess enabling factors, cost and safety. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, patients aged 18 years or older who underwent hysterectomy for endometrial cancer between January 2008 and September 2015 were identified in the Premier Healthcare Database. The surgical approach for hysterectomy was classified as open/abdominal, vaginal, laparoscopic or robotic assisted. We described trends in surgical setting, perioperative costs and safety. The impact of patient, provider and hospital characteristics on outpatient migration was assessed using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: We identified 41 246 patients who met inclusion criteria. During the time period studied, we observed a 41.3% shift from inpatient to outpatient hysterectomy (p<0.0001), an increase in robotic hysterectomy, and a decrease in abdominal hysterectomy. The robotic hysterectomy approach, more recent procedure (year), and mid-sized hospital were factors that enabled outpatient hysterectomies; while abdominal hysterectomy, older age, Medicare insurance, black ethnicity, higher number of comorbidities, and concomitant procedures were associated with an inpatient setting. The shift towards outpatient hysterectomy led to a $2500 savings per case during the study period, in parallel to the increased robotic hysterectomy rates (p<0.001). The post-discharge 30-day readmission and complications rate after outpatient hysterectomy remained stable at around 2%. CONCLUSIONS: A significant shift from inpatient to outpatient setting was observed for hysterectomies performed for endometrial cancer over time. Minimally invasive surgery, particularly the robotic approach, facilitated this migration, preserving clinical outcomes and leading to reduction in costs.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias do Endométrio/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Comorbidade , Neoplasias do Endométrio/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Histerectomia/métodos , Histerectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/estatística & dados numéricos
9.
Am J Surg ; 222(3): 650-653, 2021 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33454026

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Preoperative testing to assess the physiologic impact of pectus excavatum is sometimes ordered to meet third-party payor preauthorization requirements. This study describes the utility of physiologic testing prior to minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum (MIRPE). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients that underwent MIRPE from 1/2012-7/2016 at two academic children's hospitals. Data collected included demographics, insurance, Haller Index (HI), pulmonary function tests (PFTs) and echocardiograms (ECHO) obtained, and preauthorization denials. RESULTS: A total of 360 patients (mean age 15.7 ± 2.0 years; mean HI 4.5 ± 1.5) underwent MIRPE (Hospital 1: 189, Hospital 2: 171). Commercial insurers covered 84% of patients. Hospital 1 obtained more frequent preoperative testing (PFTs: 73% vs 6%, p < 0.0001). Overall, 72% of PFTs were normal with abnormal studies limited to mild findings. Similarly, 85% of ECHOs were normal. Third-party payors more frequently denied preauthorization for MIRPE at Hospital 2 (11% vs. 5%, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: More frequent preoperative testing may decrease initial preauthorization denials for MIRPE; however, this increased utilization of resources may not be necessary as the majority of test results are normal.


Assuntos
Ecocardiografia/estatística & dados numéricos , Tórax em Funil/cirurgia , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/estatística & dados numéricos , Testes de Função Respiratória/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Dor no Peito/epidemiologia , Dispneia/epidemiologia , Feminino , Tórax em Funil/diagnóstico por imagem , Hospitais Pediátricos , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Benefícios do Seguro , Reembolso de Seguro de Saúde , Masculino , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos
10.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 28(1): 75-81, 2021 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32234351

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Determine the prevalence of burnout and frustration among participants currently completing a fellowship in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery (FMIGS). DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: An anonymous survey was distributed to fellows in November 2018. PARTICIPANTS: Current FMIGS fellows. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 57 of 83 (67.7%) FMIGS participants in American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists-accredited programs completed a survey regarding fellowship characteristics and experiences. Overall, 40 participants (70.2%) indicated that they were satisfied with their fellowship program experience. There were 33 participants (57.9%) who reported burnout, and 38 participants (66.7%) had experienced anxiety, depression, or extreme fatigue during the last month. Of those who reported burnout, 26 (76.5%) reported that they did not receive support from their fellowship program. Participants who experienced burnout were more likely to be in their second year (p = .003), spent less time per week doing scholarly activities (p = .048), and were less satisfied with their fellowship experience (p <.001). Participants who experienced anxiety, depression, or extreme fatigue had more cofellows in their program (p = .031), worked on average more hours per week (p = .020), and were more often required to practice obstetrics in their fellowship (p = .022). CONCLUSION: Burnout symptoms are common among physicians across multiple specialties. Our findings suggest that this issue is prevalent among FMIGS participants. In addition, there is a lack of access to emotional and psychologic support programs for fellows experiencing burnout. We hope that this study will prompt attention to this important topic by both individual programs and American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists as a society to increase awareness and access to resources and promote wellness for fellows.


Assuntos
Esgotamento Profissional/epidemiologia , Frustração , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Internato e Residência/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Cirurgiões/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Esgotamento Profissional/etiologia , Estudos Transversais , Bolsas de Estudo/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/psicologia , Humanos , Satisfação no Emprego , Masculino , Obstetrícia/estatística & dados numéricos , Médicos/psicologia , Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Cirurgiões/psicologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
11.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 28(2): 259-268, 2021 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32439413

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To present updated information regarding compensation patterns for Fellowship in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery (FMIGS)-graduated physicians in the United States beginning practice during the last 10 years, focusing on the variables that have an impact on differences in salary, including gender, fellowship duration, geographic region, practice setting, and practice mix. DESIGN: An online survey was sent to FMIGS graduates between March 15, 2019 and April 12, 2019. Information on physicians' demographics, compensation (on the basis of location, practice model, productivity benchmarks, academic rank, and years in practice), and attitudes toward fairness in compensation was collected. SETTING: Online survey. PARTICIPANTS: FMIGS graduates practicing in the United States. INTERVENTION: E-mail survey. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We surveyed 298 US FMIGS surgeons who had graduated during the last 10 years (2009-2018). The response rate was 48.7%. Most of the respondents were women (69%). Most of the graduates (84.8%) completed 2- or 3-year fellowship programs. After adjustment for inflation, the median starting salary for the first postfellowship job was $252 074 ($223 986-$279 983) (Table 1). The median time spent in the first job was 2.6 years, and the median total salary at the current year rose to $278 379.4 ($241 437-$350 976). The median salary for respondents entering a second postfellowship job started at $280 945 ($261 409-$329 603). Significantly lower compensation was reported for female FMIGS graduates in their initial postfellowship jobs and was consistently lower than for that of men over time. Most FMIGS graduates (59.7%) reported feeling inadequately compensated for their level of specialization. CONCLUSION: A trend toward higher self-reported salaries is noted for FMIGS graduates in recent years, with significant differences in compensation between men and women. Among obstetrics and gynecology subspecialists, FMIGS graduates earn significantly less than other fellowship-trained physicians, with median salaries that are lower than those of generalist obstetrics and gynecology physicians.


Assuntos
Bolsas de Estudo/tendências , Ginecologia/tendências , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos , Salários e Benefícios/tendências , Adulto , Bolsas de Estudo/economia , Bolsas de Estudo/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/educação , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/tendências , Ginecologia/economia , Ginecologia/educação , Humanos , Masculino , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/educação , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/tendências , Obstetrícia/economia , Obstetrícia/educação , Obstetrícia/estatística & dados numéricos , Obstetrícia/tendências , Salários e Benefícios/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Sexuais , Cirurgiões/economia , Cirurgiões/educação , Cirurgiões/estatística & dados numéricos , Cirurgiões/tendências , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
12.
BJU Int ; 126 Suppl 1: 18-26, 2020 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32558340

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To examine national trends in the medical and surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) using Australian Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) and Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) population data from 2000 to 2018. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Annual data was extracted from the MBS, PBS and Australian Institute of Health and Welfare databases for the years 2000-2018. Population-adjusted rates of BPH procedures and medical therapies were calculated and compared in relation to age. Cost analysis was performed to estimate financial burden due to BPH. RESULTS: Overall national hospital admissions due to BPH declined between 2000 and 2018, despite an increased proportion of admissions due to private procedures (42% vs 77%). Longitudinal trends in the medical management of BPH showed an increased prescription rate of dutasteride/tamsulosin combined therapy (111 vs 7649 per 100 000 men) and dutasteride monotherapy (149 vs 336 per 100 000 men) since their introduction to the PBS in 2011. Trends in BPH surgery showed an overall progressive increase in rate of total procedures between 2000 and 2018 (92 vs 133 per 100 000 men). Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) remained the most commonly performed surgical procedure, despite reduced utilisation since 2009 (118 vs 89 per 100 000 men), offset by a higher uptake of photoselective vaporisation of prostate, holmium:YAG laser enucleation of prostate, and later likely due to minimally invasive surgical therapies including prostatic urethral lift and ablative technologies (including Rezum™). Financial burden due to BPH surgery has remained steady since 2009, whilst the burden due to medical therapy has risen sharply. CONCLUSION: Despite reduced national BPH-related hospitalisations, overall treatment for BPH has increased due to medical therapy and surgical alternatives to TURP. Further exploration into motivators for particular therapies and effect of medical therapy on BPH progression in clinical practice outside of clinical trials is warranted.


Assuntos
Hiperplasia Prostática/terapia , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Austrália , Cistoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Dutasterida/uso terapêutico , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Lasers de Estado Sólido/uso terapêutico , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Utilização de Procedimentos e Técnicas , Prostatectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirurgia , Ablação por Radiofrequência/estatística & dados numéricos , Tansulosina/uso terapêutico , Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata/estatística & dados numéricos , Agentes Urológicos/uso terapêutico
13.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 27(6): 1337-1343, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32126301

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To identify patient and hospital characteristics associated with minimally invasive hysterectomy. DESIGN: Retrospective population-based analysis of administrative data. SETTING: Data from the Illinois Hospital Association Comparative Health Care and Hospital Data Reporting Services Database. PATIENTS: Women undergoing hysterectomy for benign gynecologic indications in Illinois, 2016 to 2018. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We determined the significance of the proportion of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) versus abdominal hysterectomies by patient and hospital characteristics. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the association between patient and hospital characteristics and the likelihood of MIS versus abdominal hysterectomy controlling for the simultaneous effects of all patient and hospital characteristics and year of surgery. There were 42 945 hysterectomies for benign indications at 143 nonfederal Illinois hospitals from 2016 to 2018. More than three-fourths (32 387, 75.4%) of hysterectomies were MIS. Non-Hispanic black patients had the lowest percentage of MIS (54.7%) compared with 82.1% among whites (p <.001). Being non-Hispanic black (odds ratio [OR] = 0.53, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.47-0.60), other or unknown race and ethnicity (OR 0.76, 95% CI, 0.52-0.85), or having a diagnosis of myomas (OR 0.54, 95% CI, 0.49-0.60) were associated with a lower likelihood of MIS. Patients treated at hospitals with >80% MIS had almost 6 times the likelihood of MIS (OR 5.89, 95% CI, 4.51-7.68). CONCLUSION: Black race and a myoma diagnosis were independently associated with decreased odds of undergoing an MIS hysterectomy, whereas the strongest predictor of undergoing an MIS hysterectomy was hospital proportion of minimally invasive procedures.


Assuntos
Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Histerectomia/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Seleção de Pacientes , Adulto , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Feminino , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/etnologia , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Histerectomia/efeitos adversos , Histerectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Illinois/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores Socioeconômicos , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem
14.
J Surg Oncol ; 121(4): 670-675, 2020 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31967336

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is preferred for distal pancreatectomy but is not always attempted due to the risk of conversion to open. We hypothesized that the total cost for MIS converted to open procedures would be comparable to those that started open. METHODS: A prospectively collected institutional registry (2011-2017) was reviewed for demographic, clinical, and perioperative cost data for patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy. RESULTS: There were 80 patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy: 41 open, 39 MIS (11 laparoscopic and 28 robotic). Conversion to open occurred in 14 of 39 (36%, 3 laparoscopic and 11 robotic). Length of stay was shorter for the MIS completed (6 days; range, 3-8), and MIS converted to open (7 days; range, 4-10) groups, compared with open (10 days; range, 5-36; P = .003). Laparoscopic cases were the least expensive (P = .02). Robotic converted to open procedures had the highest operating room cost. However, the total cost for robotic converted to open cohort was similar to the open cohort due to cost savings associated with a shorter length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the higher intraoperative costs of robotic surgery, there is no significant overall financial penalty for conversion to open. Financial considerations should not play a role in selecting a robotic or open approach.


Assuntos
Pancreatectomia/economia , Pancreatectomia/métodos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Conversão para Cirurgia Aberta/economia , Conversão para Cirurgia Aberta/métodos , Conversão para Cirurgia Aberta/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Laparoscopia/economia , Laparoscopia/métodos , Laparoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Pancreatectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos
15.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 27(5): 1167-1177.e2, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31518712

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Evaluate racial/ethnic variation in hysterectomy surgical route in women likely eligible for minimally invasive hysterectomy. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Multistate including Colorado, Florida, Maryland, New Jersey, and New York. PATIENTS: Women aged ≥18 years without diagnoses of leiomyomas, obesity, or previous abdominopelvic surgery who underwent hysterectomy for benign conditions from the State Inpatient and Ambulatory Surgery Databases, 2010-2014. INTERVENTIONS: None. Primary exposure is race/ethnicity. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Racial/ethnic variation in annual hysterectomy rates and surgical route. To calculate hysterectomy rates per 100 000 women/year, denominators were adjusted for the proportion of women with previous hysterectomy. A marginal structural log binomial regression model was used to estimate adjusted standardized prevalence ratios (aPRs) for vaginal or laparoscopic vs abdominal hysterectomy, controlling for clustering within hospitals. In addition, hospitals were stratified into quintiles to examine surgical route in hospitals that serve a higher vs lower proportion of African American patients. A total of 133 082 adult women underwent hysterectomy for benign conditions from 2010 to 2014. Annual laparoscopic rates increased more slowly for African Americans (1.6-fold) than for whites (1.8-fold) and Hispanics (1.9-fold). African American and Hispanic women were less likely to undergo vaginal (aPR = 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90-0.96 and aPR = 0.95; 95% CI 0.93-0.97, respectively) and laparoscopic hysterectomy (aPR = 0.90; 95% CI, 0.87-0.94 and aPR = 0.95; 95% CI, 0.92-0.98, respectively) than white women; Asian/Pacific Islander women were less likely to undergo vaginal hysterectomy (aPR = 0.88; 95% CI, 0.81-0.96). Hospitals serving a higher proportion of African American persons performed more abdominal and fewer vaginal procedures across all groups, and more racial/ethnic minority women sought care at those hospitals than white women. CONCLUSION: African American, Hispanic, and Asian/Pacific Islander women eligible for minimally invasive hysterectomy were more likely than white women to receive abdominal hysterectomy. The proportion of all women undergoing abdominal hysterectomy was highest at hospitals serving higher proportions of African American persons. This difference in treatment type can lead to disparities in outcomes, in part owing to their association with complications.


Assuntos
Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Histerectomia/métodos , Histerectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Grupos Raciais/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/etnologia , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hispânico ou Latino/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Laparoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Grupos Minoritários/estatística & dados numéricos , Seleção de Pacientes , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos
16.
J Pediatr Surg ; 55(1): 182-186, 2020 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31676078

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the resource utilization and outcome of a minimally invasive pilonidal protocol (MIPP) versus surgical excision (SE) in adolescents with pilonidal disease. METHODS: Improved hygiene, laser epilation (LE), and sinusectomy were implemented as a minimally invasive pilonidal protocol (MIPP) in March 2016. Following IRB approval, 34 consecutive MIPP patients with moderate and severe disease were compared with a random sample of 17 SE patients treated prior to MIPP implementation. Number of visits, laser epilation (LE) treatments, care duration, operations, operating room (OR) time, charges, and condition at last visit were analyzed. Charges were standardized for 2018. RESULTS: No differences were found in age or body mass index between groups. SE patients underwent an average 1.6 excisions/patient (cumulative 2598 OR minutes) and no LE. MIPP patients underwent an average 1.4 sinusectomies and 3.5 LEs/patient. Six sinusectomies (0.17/patient) were performed in OR (cumulative 258 OR minutes). No differences in number of visits or care duration were found between groups. At last follow-up, 82% of MIPP and 18% of SE patients were healed or asymptomatic (p < 0.01). Average charges were $29,098 for SE versus $8440 for MIPP (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: A minimally invasive pilonidal protocol reduces charges and improves outcome compared with surgical excision in adolescents. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective comparative study.


Assuntos
Remoção de Cabelo/estatística & dados numéricos , Recursos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Higiene , Seio Pilonidal/economia , Seio Pilonidal/cirurgia , Adolescente , Honorários e Preços , Feminino , Recursos em Saúde/economia , Humanos , Masculino , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Visita a Consultório Médico/estatística & dados numéricos , Recidiva , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
17.
Am J Surg ; 219(1): 15-20, 2020 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31307661

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: This study aims to evaluate the effect of the ACA Medicaid expansion on the utilization of minimally invasive (MIS) approaches to common general surgical procedures. METHODS: We queried five Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Databases to evaluate rates of utilization and costs of MIS and open approaches pre and post Medicaid expansion. RESULTS: 117,241 patients met the inclusion criteria. Following the enactment of the ACA, use of both laparoscopic gastric bypass (IRR 1.08; 95% CI: [1.02, 1.15]) and Nissen fundoplication (IRR 1.17; 95% CI [1.09, 1.26]) increased in Medicaid patients treated in expansion states than in those treated in non-expansion states. Simultaneously, the costs reported for self-pay patients increased in expansion states more than in non-expansion states (+$1669; 95% CI [$655, $2682]). CONCLUSIONS: Medicaid expansion was associated with increased rates of utilization of MIS approaches to several surgical procedures and a shifting of costs toward patients who were self-insured.


Assuntos
Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicaid/organização & administração , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
18.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 108(6): 1648-1655, 2019 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31400324

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive lobectomy is associated with decreased morbidity and length of stay. However, there have been few published analyses using recent, population-level data to compare clinical outcomes and cost by surgical approach, inclusive of robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS). The objective of this study was to compare outcomes and hospitalization costs among patients undergoing open, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and RATS lobectomy. METHODS: We identified patients who underwent elective lobectomy in the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Florida State Inpatient Database (2008 to 2014). Hierarchical logistic and linear regression models were used to compare in-hospital mortality, postoperative complications, prolonged length of stay, 30-day readmissions, and index hospitalization costs among cohorts. RESULTS: We identified 15,038 patients, of whom 8501 (56.5%), 4608 (30.7%), and 1929 (12.8%) underwent open, VATS, and RATS lobectomy, respectively. Robotic-assisted lobectomies comprised less than 1% of total lobectomy volume in 2008, and grew to 25% of lobectomy volume by 2014. Both VATS and RATS lobectomies were associated with decreased in-hospital mortality compared to thoracotomy (VATS odds ratio 0.69, 95% confidence interval, 0.50 to 0.94; RATS odds ratio 0.58, 95% confidence interval, 0.35 to 0.96; P = .016). After adjusting for patient age, sex, income, comorbidities, and hospital teaching status, VATS lobectomy was 2% less expensive (P = .007) and robotic-assisted lobectomy was 13% more expensive (P < .001) than the open approach. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive approaches were associated to improved clinical outcomes compared with open lobectomy. However, only robotic-assisted lobectomy has had rapid growth in utilization. Despite additional cost, RATS lobectomy appears to provide a viable minimally invasive alternative for general thoracic procedures.


Assuntos
Pneumonectomia/métodos , Utilização de Procedimentos e Técnicas/tendências , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Cirurgia Torácica Vídeoassistida/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Comorbidade , Feminino , Florida , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Readmissão do Paciente , Pneumonectomia/economia , Pneumonectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Análise de Regressão , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/economia , Cirurgia Torácica Vídeoassistida/economia , Resultado do Tratamento
19.
J Surg Res ; 243: 75-82, 2019 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31158727

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is associated with improved colorectal cancer (CRC) outcomes, but it is used less frequently in emergency settings. We aimed to assess patient-level factors associated with emergency presentation for CRC and the use of MIS in emergency versus elective settings. METHODS: This retrospective study examined the clinical data of patients who underwent emergency and elective resections for CRC from 2013 to 2015 using the Florida Inpatient Discharge Dataset. Multivariable analyses were performed to assess differences in gender, age, race, urbanization, region, insurance, and clinical characteristics associated with mode of presentation and surgical approach. In-hospital mortality and length of stay by mode of presentation were recorded. RESULTS: Of 16,277 patients identified, 10,224 (61%) had elective surgery and 6503 (39%) had emergency surgery. Emergency presentations were more likely to be black (14.2% versus 9.5%), Hispanic (18.9% versus 15.4%), Medicaid-insured (9.7% versus 4.2%), and have metastatic cancer (34.4% versus 20.2%) or multiple comorbidities (12.6% versus 4.0%). MIS was the surgical approach in 31.8% of emergency cases versus 48.1% of elective cases. Factors associated with lower odds of MIS for emergencies include Medicaid (odds ratio (OR) 0.79, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.63-0.99), metastases (OR 0.56, CI 0.5-0.63), and multiple comorbidities (OR 0.53, CI 0.4-0.7). Emergency cases experienced higher in-hospital mortality (3.7% versus 1.0%) and a longer median length of stay (10 d versus 5 d). CONCLUSIONS: Emergency CRC presentations are associated with racial minorities, Medicaid insurance, metastatic disease, and multiple comorbidities. Odds of MIS in emergency settings are lowest for patients with Medicaid insurance and highest clinical disease burden.


Assuntos
Colectomia/métodos , Neoplasias Colorretais/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Utilização de Procedimentos e Técnicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Protectomia/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Colectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorretais/epidemiologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Emergências , Feminino , Florida/epidemiologia , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Protectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto Jovem
20.
J Obstet Gynaecol Res ; 45(6): 1091-1095, 2019 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30977214

RESUMO

AIM: To clarify the status of minimally invasive gynecologic surgery (MIGS) in the Asia/Oceania region. METHODS: Survey questionnaires were sent out to the representative of AOFOG countries. They consisted of questions on the general status of MIGS, the clinical indication of MIGS, cost coverage, company support, training and certification for MIGS, patient preference for MIGS and requirements for the AOFOG. RESULTS: Developmental stage of MIGS in this region was roughly divided into three categories: fully developed countries, countries in the developmental stage and countries in the rudimentary stage. Clinical indication of MIGS and training opportunity of young doctors were correlated with the developmental stage. CONCLUSION: Support by AOFOG should be considered according to the developmental stage of each country. Collecting updated information on MIGS in each member country is important to provide adequate support.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos , Sociedades Médicas , Ásia , Países Desenvolvidos/estatística & dados numéricos , Países em Desenvolvimento/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/educação , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/normas , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/educação , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/normas , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Oceania , Sociedades Médicas/normas , Sociedades Médicas/estatística & dados numéricos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA