An assessment of the quality of care provided to orthognathic surgery patients through a multidisciplinary clinic.

The quality of care delivered to 74 patients undergoing orthognathic surgery was assessed using a patient satisfaction questionnaire and data collected from hospital case records. Surgical complications, hospital services, patient satisfaction, and impact on quality of life, were the main aspects considered. The majority of patients reported that their treatment objectives had been achieved and that they were satisfied with the quality of care provided. The main concern of the patients regarding the clinic was the waiting time before an appointment could be offered. Eating and breathing difficulties and low mood after surgery were the main reported complications. Sixty-three patients experienced post-operative weight loss. The importance of a nutritious, high calorie soft diet should be emphasised and the use of menthol inhalations following maxillary osteotomies should be considered more frequently. Clinicians should be aware of post-operative low mood, which may require psychological support. We developed a sensitive assessment battery with comprehensive parameters to audit quality of orthognathic surgery service, and recommend that a similar approach should be considered by teams which undertake management of orthognathic patients.

Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index outcomes for orthodontic and orthognathic surgery patients.

The Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index is commonly used to evaluate occlusal outcomes after orthodontic treatment. We compared the PAR outcomes of 40 consecutively treated orthodontic patients and 40 orthognathic patients to evaluate the standard of care given. A patient-centred questionnaire was used to examine patients' perceptions of the benefits of orthognathic treatment. PAR scores of orthodontic and orthognathic patients improved by a mean of 77% and 74%, respectively, after treatment indicating that excellent to good occlusal results were achieved for both groups. A high quality occlusal outcome is important for all patients as good intercuspation at the end of treatment is thought to improve stability. Most orthognathic patients reported improvements in their dental and facial appearance and thought that the treatment had been beneficial.

An analysis of studies on piezoelectric surgery in the oral and craniomaxillofacial region with regard to human subject protection and financial conflicts.

This retrospective, observational study investigated whether published studies on the use of piezoelectric surgery (PS) in the oral and craniomaxillofacial region fulfilled the requirements of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) and the Declaration of Helsinki (DoH) with respect to human subject protections (HSP) and disclosure of financial conflicts (FC). A Medline/PUBMED search was performed in April 2008 to identify all clinical studies on PS, published in English, French and German. Disclosure of HSP (obtaining ethical approval and subjects' informed consent) and FC mentioned in the retrieved articles were analysed. 29 clinical articles were identified in 18 journals, of which 14 journals (78%) required the disclosure of both HSP and FC. Ethical approval was documented in two studies (7%); patient consent was reported in four publications (14%). Four articles disclosed no FC. 21 reports (72%) mentioned neither HSP nor FC. The relationships between funding source and study outcomes could not be identified. Most studies on the use of PS hardly adhered to the regulations recommended by the ICMJE and DoH, and do not mention HSP and FC, indicating the study results with a high degree of suspicion. It is recommended that oral and craniomaxillofacial surgery journals adhere strictly to these regulations because they carry a heavy responsibility regarding the scientific integrity of publications in this specialty.