Evaluating Financial Toxicity in Urologic Practice.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate financial toxicity in Urologic surgery using the Comprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST) as well as validate a single item measure of toxicity. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of 182 patients undergoing oncologic and benign urologic procedures at a single academic medical center. Oncologic procedures included robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy, transurethral resection of bladder tumor, and radical cystectomy. Benign procedures included holmium laser enucleation of the prostate, intravesical chemodenervation, ureteroscopy laser lithotripsy, and ureteral stent exchange. Retrospective review, patient interviews, and the previously validated COST survey, as well as a novel single item measure of toxicity were used pre and post-op. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression models compared COST scores by type of urologic procedure. RESULTS: Eighty (44%) patients underwent oncologic procedures and 102 (56%) benign procedures. Benign patients were most likely to have lower income and be younger than oncologic patients, with a median age of 56.7 vs 64.9. One in 4 patients undergoing urologic procedures experienced moderate to severe financial toxicity, without a statistically significant difference between the benign and the oncology groups pre- or post-operatively. Single item measure strongly correlated with COST (r = -0.80) pre- and post-operative. CONCLUSION: The COST survey and a single-item financial toxicity measure are both valid tools that can be used to measure financial toxicity in urology. Further research is needed to elicit the exact cause of financial toxicity in the heterogenous urologic patient population.

[Complications in urological surgery. The urologist as a player in risk management]. / Les complications en chirurgie urologique. L'urologue acteur de la gestion des risques.

The first part of this article deals with accreditation of the quality of the professional practice of urologists and medical teams working in public or private health care institutions. This is a voluntary national risk management process based on the reporting and analysis of medical risk events and the development and implementation of recommendations. The fundamental objective of the system is to reduce the frequency and severity of adverse events associated with care for the patient. The second part aims to describe the mechanisms and management of surgical complications. The perception of complications by the urologist is discussed, as it may be distorted by cognitive biases leading to inappropriate actions. Two important points were also emphasized: communication with the patient following an injury, therapeutic hazard or complication following an error, and proper maintenance of the medical record. A joint effort to cultivate a culture of safety and quality in urological surgical practice should be encouraged. Collective actions by urologists in the future should help to maintain a proactive attitude: - generalization of quality accreditation of urologic physicians' professional practice; - national registry: which has demonstrated its advantages in the world of aeronautics; - creation of a specific module "Management of complications in urology" in teaching (ECU) and continuing education (SUC, website); - creation of an AFU "Complications" Committee; - management of social networks.

Quality of Pre-operative Assessment for Mid Urethral Slings in Women Who Present With Mesh Complications.

OBJECTIVE: To study quality of pre- and post-operative evaluation in women undergoing mid-urethral synthetic sling surgery who subsequently have complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Study inclusion was chart availability for preoperative clinical history, examination, urodynamics and/or post-operative visit in women with mesh complications 2014-2021 in a tertiary practice. The primary outcome was compliance with quality indicators and guidelines for preoperative and post-operative clinical evaluation and urodynamics. RESULTS: 122 women had preoperative, 102 urodynamic reports and 108 post-operative charts available for review. Only clinical history and examination showed moderate compliance (71% nature, 57% severity, 87% exam) with quality indicators, all other quality indicators were low. including documentation of counselling of mesh risks (11%) and risks of incontinence surgery (17%) . Compliance with guidelines (optimal care) was also low (bladder diary 61%, all others ≤41%). Post-operative evaluation did not comprehensively screen for complication e.g., flow rate/post-void residual performed in 9%. A significant proportion had an early adverse symptom (55%) or intervention e.g. trimming of exposure (40%) CONCLUSION: Compliance with quality indicators and guidelines was generally low for pre-operative evaluation and urodynamic testing. There was inadequate content and length of post-operative evaluation despite a significant proportion presenting with adverse symptoms at first postoperative follow-up. Future research could target these areas for development of tools to improve compliance and education of health providers.

Outpatient Robotic Surgery in Pediatric Urology: Assessment of Feasibility and Short-Term Safety.

PURPOSE: Robotic reconstructive and extirpative procedures have been widely utilized for surgical management of various conditions in pediatric urology. Outpatient laparoscopic surgery has become the standard in cases of orchidopexy, inguinal hernia repair and varicocelectomy. There is a growing body of evidence that robotic surgery for more complex conditions can also be performed in an outpatient setting. The aim of the study was to assess the short-term safety and feasibility of robotic reconstructive and extirpative procedures for various pediatric urological conditions as scheduled outpatient procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Demographic information and perioperative data were prospectively collected in an institutional database for all pediatric patients undergoing outpatient robotic surgery from June 2012 to December 2019. Primary outcomes included rates of 30-day complications, emergency room visits and readmissions. RESULTS: A total of 135 pediatric patients underwent robotic procedures in an outpatient setting. The majority underwent pyeloplasty (62) or extravesical ureteral reimplantation (55). Ten patients underwent ureteroureterostomy and 8 patients underwent extirpative procedures (nephrectomy, hemi-nephrectomy). Median age at surgery was 62 months (IQR, 27-99), median weight was 20 kg (IQR, 12-30) and median body mass index was 17 (IQR, 15-18). During the 30-day followup period there were 9 complications (6.7%), of which only 1 (0.7%) was high grade (Clavien-Dindo 3). There were 9 emergency room visits (6.7%) including 5 cases of readmission (3.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Robotic reconstructive and extirpative procedures in pediatric urology can be safely performed as scheduled outpatient procedures in the majority of patients, obviating the need for routine inpatient care.

Outcomes and costs analysis of Externalized PyeloUreteral versus internal Double-J ureteral stents after paediatric laparoscopic Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty.

BACKGROUND: The gold standard treatment for Uretero-Pelvic Junction Obstruction (UPJO) is laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty according to the Anderson-Hynes technique. The internal Double-J ureteral (DJ) and the Externalized PyeloUreteral (EPU) stents are usually the drainage of choice. Only a few articles have compared the clinical impact of the different drainage techniques on the perioperative morbidity and none presented a cost analysis of the incurred hospital stay. OBJECTIVE: To present the clinical outcome and financial analysis of a cohort of children who underwent a laparoscopic pyeloplasty comparing the use of the DJ versus EPU stent. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study of consecutives children who underwent laparoscopic Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty in a single tertiary paediatric referral centre from January 2017 to March 2020. Patients were grouped according to the type of stent used: DJ stent vs EPU stent. RESULTS: Fifty-three laparoscopic pyeloplasties were performed on 51 patients: 27 (50.9%) had an EPU stent and 26 (49.1%) a DJ stent. There was no statistically significant difference between the two patient groups with regards to surgical time, hospital stay, stent-related complications or the need for re-do surgery. All the EPU stents were removed with an outpatient admission 8.1 days ± 3.1 after surgery while the DJ stents were removed with a cystoscopy 61.6 days ± 30.2 after surgery (p value < 0.001). On a financial analysis (Figure), the hospital costs for stent removal were significantly lower for the EPU stent group (£ 686.7 ± 263.4 vs £ 1425 ± 299.5, p value < 0.01). DISCUSSION: Both drainage methods have some disadvantages. Possible complications associated with DJ stents include migration and artificial vesicoureteral reflux which may lead to higher incidence of Urinary Tract Infections. Possible disadvantages of the EPU stent insertion are related to the damage of the renal parenchyma and to the risk of developing skin site infections and urinary leaks. However, in our series the EPU stent has not been associated with a higher incidence of bleeding, leakage or discomfort. In addition to clinical considerations, there is a financial implication to be considered. With this regard, the EPU stent was associated with a significant reduction in the incurred hospital costs. CONCLUSIONS: The use of DJ and EPU stents is equivalent in regards of overall complications and success rates. DJ and EPU stents provided comparable success and complication rates, however the latter avoids the need of an additional general anaesthesia and reduces the overall incurred hospital costs.

Implementation of frailty preoperative assessment to predict outcome in patients undergoing urological surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: A common limit of the widely used risk scores for preoperative assessment is the lack of information about aspects linked to frailty that may affect outcome, especially in the setting of elderly patients undergoing urological surgery. Frailty has recently been introduced as an additional characteristic to be assessed for better identifying patients at risk of negative outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To examine the evidence for recent advances in preoperative assessment in patients undergoing urological surgery focussing on the detrimental effect of frailty on outcome, including major (mPCs) and total postoperative complications (tPCs), discharge to a facility, and mortality. The secondary aim was to establish which cut-off scores of the modified Frailty Index (mFI, 11 items) and/or simplified FI (sFI, five items) predicted PCs. METHODS: We searched PubMed, the Excerpta Medica database (EMBASE), Cochrane Library and clinicaltrial.gov from inception to 31 May 2020. Studies reporting relationships between the investigated outcomes and patients' frailty were included. We estimated odds ratios (ORs) through a random effect model by using Revman 5.4. RESULTS: Frailty, assessed by different tools, was associated with a significantly higher rate of 30-day (OR 1.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.58-1.89) and 90-day (OR 2.09, 95% CI 1.14-3.82) mPCs and 30-day tPCs (OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.76-2.52). A mFI of ≥2 was associated with a higher rate of 30-day mPCs (OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.69-1.89) and greater 30-day mortality (OR 3.46, 95% CI 2.10-5.49). A pre-planned post hoc analysis also revealed that a sFI of ≥3 was predictive of mPCs (OR 3.30, 95% CI 2.12-5.12). CONCLUSIONS: Frailty assessment may help to predict PCs and mortality in patients undergoing major urological surgery. Either a mFi of ≥2 or sFI of ≥3 should be considered potential 'red flags' for preoperative risk assessment and decision-making. There is not enough evidence to confirm the necessity to perform frailty assessment in minor urological surgery.

Needs Assessment for Lower Urinary Tract Injury Curriculum for FPMRS Fellowships.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the level and types of training Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited programs use for female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery (FPMRS) fellows' education on lower urinary tract injuries (LUTIs). METHODS: Two surveys were developed to assess the need for LUTI curriculum from both program director (PD) and fellow vantages through a multistage process, including review by knowledgeable colleagues, cognitive interviews, and pilot testing. Surveys were distributed in an electronic link via e-mail to graduating fellows and program directors from each of the 58 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited FPMRS programs. RESULTS: Thirty-four graduating FPMRS fellows (71%) and 39 FPMRS PDs (67%) completed the survey. Both PDs and fellows responded that both the evaluation and management of LUTI were necessary to FPMRS training. The majority of PDs use a combination of didactics and hands-on learning in the operating room (60% and 71%). Only 40% and 30% incorporate simulation into the curriculum to address LUTI. Graduating fellows report low numbers of procedures to evaluate and manage LUTI. Specifically, only 15% of fellows graduate with greater than 2 ureteral reimplantations and 44% graduate with no minimally invasive abdominal vesicovaginal fistula repairs. The majority of graduating fellows reported feeling prepared to evaluate for LUTI, but nearly one third do not feel ready to independently manage LUTI upon graduation. CONCLUSIONS: FPMRS PDs and fellows agree that the evaluation and management of LUTI are important; however, most programs use only didactics and hands-on learning in the operating room with extremely low case volumes, leading to decreased proficiency.

Correlation of Relative Value Units With Surgical Complexity and Physician Workload in Urology.

OBJECTIVE: To define the relationship between urology relative value units (RVUs) and measures of surgical complexity and physician workload. Secondary objectives include: (1) identifying procedures with outlying RVU values for their measures of surgical complexity and workload; and (2) calculating projected RVU values for these procedures. METHODS: We obtained surgical case data for 71 urology current procedural terminology (CPT) codes from the 2017 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to measure the association between mean total work RVU and operative time, length of hospital stay, serious adverse events, readmissions, and mortality. We developed a multivariable regression model to predict mean total work RVU from these measures. Studentized residuals were used to identify outlying CPT codes for both bivariable and multivariable regression models, and empirically derived RVU values from complexity and work effort metrics were estimated. RESULTS: We analyzed 71 urology CPT codes encompassing 55,068 cases. RVUs correlated well with median length of hospital stay (R = 0.81), median operative time (R = 0.92), serious adverse events (R = 0.83), and readmissions (R = 0.74). RVUs were poorly correlated with mortality (R = 0.34). Outlying procedures identified using the multivariable model were retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (projected +21.09 RVUs), laparoscopic ureteroneocystotomy (projected -12.34 RVUs), and cystectomy with bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy (projected +9.37 RVUs). CONCLUSION: Urology work RVUs correlate more with operative time than other measures of surgical complexity and physician workload. There exist several significant outlying procedures for various work measures. Incorporating objective work data may improve RVU assignments in the future.

Opioid Prescriptions for Female Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery Patients Before and After Implementation of Tennessee State Legislation.

OBJECTIVES: Limited data exist regarding the impact of state legislation on opioid-prescribing patterns, particularly in states with the highest opioid-prescribing rates in the nation. Our primary objective was to examine the change in the amount of opioid morphine equivalents (OMEs) prescribed at discharge to patients undergoing female pelvic reconstructive surgery after the implementation of state legislation created in response to the opioid crisis. METHODS: At our institution, state legislation went into effect on July 1, 2018, implementing limitations on OMEs prescribed to patients. This retrospective cohort study examines all adult women undergoing female pelvic reconstructive surgery from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2018. The study compares prescribing practices 6 months before and 6 months after the state law was enacted. RESULTS: In total, 346 patients met inclusion criteria. The 2 groups had similar demographics. Surgical procedures were well distributed, with 52% of cases occurring in the first 6 months of the calendar year. At the time of discharge, 324 (96.7%) patients received an opioid prescription, with an overall average of 197 OMEs. After the implementation of state legislation on July 1, 2018, the amount of OMEs prescribed at discharge significantly decreased, from a median of 210 mg (interquartile range, 150-225) to 150 mg (interquartile range 135-225; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: State legislation was associated with a significant decrease in prescribed OMEs at the time of discharge in patients undergoing female pelvic reconstructive surgery. These results support ongoing legislative efforts to address the current opioid crisis.

Assessment of long term outcomes after buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty: the impact of chronic kidney disease.

OBJECTIVES: To compare and assess various outcomes and success of buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty (BMGU) in patients with CKD versus patients having normal renal function. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a retrospective, single centre study, during period 2013 to 2017. Patients were grouped into two groups. Group 1 had patients with estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR)>60mL/min/1.73m2 while group 2 had patients with eGFR <60mL/min/1.73m2. eGFR was calculated according to the MDRD equation. The two groups were compared with regard to various outcomes like length, location of stricture, technique of graft placement, intra-operative blood loss (haemoglobin drop), duration of hospital stay, post-operative complications and recurrence. RESULTS: A total of 223 patients were included in study with group 1 had 130 patients and group 2 had 93 patients. Mean age of patients with CKD were higher (47.49 years versus 29.13 years). The mean follow-up period was comparable between both groups (23.29 months and 22.54 months respectively). Patients with CKD had more post-operative Clavien Grade 2 or higher complications (p=0.01) and a greater recurrence rates (p<0.001) than in non-CKD patients. On multivariate analysis, age and CKD status was significant predictor of urethroplasty success (p=0.004) (OR= 14.98 (1.952-114.94, 95% CI). CONCLUSIONS: CKD patients are more prone to post-operative complications in terms of wound infection, graft uptake and graft failure and higher recurrence rates following BMGU.

The LACE+ Index as a Predictor of 30-Day Patient Outcomes in a Urologic Surgery Population: A Coarsened Exact Match Study.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the potential of LACE+ scores, in patients undergoing urologic surgery, to predict short-term undesirable outcomes. METHODS: Coarsened exact matching was used to assess the predictive value of the LACE+ index among all urologic surgery cases over a 2-year period (2016-2018) at 1 health system (n = 9824). Study subjects were matched on characteristics not assessed by LACE+, including duration of surgery and race, among others. For comparison of outcomes, matched populations were compared by LACE+ quartile with Q4 as the referent group: Q4 vs Q1, Q4 vs Q2, Q4 vs Q3. RESULTS: Seven hundred and twenty-two patients were matched for Q1-Q4; 1120 patients were matched for Q2-Q4; 2550 patients were matched for Q3-Q4. Escalating LACE+ score significantly predicted increased readmission (2.86% vs 4.91% for Q2 vs Q4; P = .012) and Emergency Room (ER) visits at 30 days postop (5.69% vs 11.37% for Q1 vs Q4, 4.11% vs 11.45% for Q2 vs Q4, 8.29% vs 13.32% for Q3 vs Q4; P <.001 for all). Increasing LACE score did not predict reoperation within 30 days or rate of death over follow-up within 30 postoperative days. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that the LACE+ index is suitable as a prediction model for important patient outcomes in a urologic surgery population including unanticipated readmission and ER evaluation.

Assessment of long term outcomes after buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty: the impact of chronic kidney disease

ABSTRACT Objectives To compare and assess various outcomes and success of buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty (BMGU) in patients with CKD versus patients having normal renal function. Material and Methods This was a retrospective, single centre study, during period 2013 to 2017. Patients were grouped into two groups. Group 1 had patients with estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR)>60mL/min/1.73m2 while group 2 had patients with eGFR <60mL/min/1.73m2. eGFR was calculated according to the MDRD equation. The two groups were compared with regard to various outcomes like length, location of stricture, technique of graft placement, intra-operative blood loss (haemoglobin drop), duration of hospital stay, post-operative complications and recurrence. Results A total of 223 patients were included in study with group 1 had 130 patients and group 2 had 93 patients. Mean age of patients with CKD were higher (47.49 years versus 29.13 years). The mean follow-up period was comparable between both groups (23.29 months and 22.54 months respectively). Patients with CKD had more post-operative Clavien Grade 2 or higher complications (p=0.01) and a greater recurrence rates (p<0.001) than in non-CKD patients. On multivariate analysis, age and CKD status was significant predictor of urethroplasty success (p=0.004) (OR= 14.98 (1.952-114.94, 95% CI). Conclusions CKD patients are more prone to post-operative complications in terms of wound infection, graft uptake and graft failure and higher recurrence rates following BMGU.

Evaluation of Opioid Prescriptions After Urogynecologic Surgery Within a Large Health Care Organization: How Much Are We Prescribing?

OBJECTIVES: Data regarding postoperative opioid prescriptions for patients undergoing urogynecologic surgery are sparse. Our objective was to quantify surgeon prescribing patterns for patients undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse or stress urinary incontinence. METHODS: Patients who underwent surgery for pelvic organ prolapse or SUI within a large health care maintenance organization were identified by procedural codes within the electronic medical record. Medical records were reviewed for demographic and clinical data. Our primary objective was to describe initial postoperative morphine milligram equivalent (MME) dosages for patients undergoing various urogynecologic surgeries. Secondary objectives were to evaluate rates of postoperative non-opioid analgesic prescriptions, presence of additional postoperative opioid prescriptions within 90 days of surgery, and to characterize prescribing patterns of surgeons from different specialties. RESULTS: We evaluated 855 patients undergoing 7 urogynecologic surgeries. There was wide variation in the quantity of MME prescribed to patients undergoing different urogynecologic surgeries, and the mean MME ranged from 137.6 mg after a colpocleisis to 214.1 mg after a laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension. Less than two thirds of patients received a postoperative nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) prescription, and rates of NSAID prescriptions varied widely between surgeons from different specialties. Thirty-nine (4.6%) patients received an additional postoperative opioid prescription specifically for the indication of persistent postoperative pain. CONCLUSIONS: There is wide variation in the range of MME prescribed postoperatively to patients undergoing common urogynecologic surgeries. Less than two thirds of patients received a postoperative NSAID prescription, which was found to be independently associated with a higher postoperative opioid prescription dose.

Robotic urologic surgery: trends in litigation over the last decade.

There is a lack of information regarding malpractice claims and indemnity payments associated with robotic cases in surgery. Malpractice claims and indemnity payouts will elucidate and mitigate harms of future adoption of new technology into surgery. We analyzed claims filed against Intuitive Surgical, Inc. from 2000 to 2017. A law librarian identified product liability claims from 2000 to 2017 with the defendant "Intuitive Surgical, Inc." using the Bloomberg Law database. We reviewed all available legal documents pertaining to identified claims, and extracted data points including filing date, surgery date, surgery type, robot type, instrument type, complications, and case outcomes. Since 2000, 123 claims were filed; 108 met criteria for inclusion. Gynecologic surgeries comprised the majority of claims (62%, 67 claims), followed by urologic surgeries (20%, 22 claims). Number of claims filed peaked in 2013 (30%, 32 claims) and then decreased each year, with 6% (7 claims) filed in 2016, and only 1% (1 claim) filed in 2017. Of the 22 claims regarding robotic urologic surgeries, 19 claims (86%) pertained to prostatectomy. Commonly alleged injuries in urologic cases were bowel injury (8 claims), erectile dysfunction (5 claims), bowel fistulas (4 claims), and incontinence (4 claims). Device failure was cited in only 2 claims. Early adopters of robotic surgery were at highest risk of litigation. This risk subsequently decreased despite the wide spread adoption of this technology. Almost all claims were secondary to surgical complications and not device failure, thus demonstrating a need for more systematic training for novel devices and early adopters.

[Assessment of the sound level in the operating room during urological surgery]. / Évaluation du niveau sonore dans un bloc opératoire d'urologie.

OBJECTIVES: In the operating room, a high sound level is associated with a higher risk of complications and affects the communication between the various workers. The objective of this study was to assess the sound level at the operating room during urological procedures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A monocentric cross-sectional study was carried out in 100 procedures in urology. They were divided into four groups: open surgical procedures, endoscopic procedures, pure laparoscopic procedures, and robotic-assisted laparoscopic procedures. The sound level was measured with the Sound Metter by Examobile application (Bielsko-Biala, Poland) for i-phone®. RESULTS: For all procedures, mean sound level, mean minimum sound level and mean maximum sound level were 60.31±3.3 db, 52.42±2.6 db and 81.73±2.8 db, respectively. For endourological procedures, they were 61.6±4.1 db, 53.4±4.1 db and 81.3±3.1 db, respectively. For open surgery, they were 59.0±1.0 db, 51.6±1.8 db and 81.4±1.5 db, respectively. For laparoscopic surgery, they were 58.33±0.6 db, 50.66±1.2 db and 83.33±1.5 db, respectively. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery, they were 60.0±2.4 db, 52.5±2.3 db and 83.56±1.8 db, respectively. No difference was found according to the type of surgical approach. However, the sound level in the operating room was increased for endourological procedures using the laser technology as compared to endourological procedures without laser used (58.7±1.1 vs. 66.3±0.1 db, P=0.01, respectively). CONCLUSION: The sound level in the operating room during urological procedures was high. For the endourological procedures, the sound level was the highest when the laser technology was used. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

A contemporary population-based analysis of the incidence, cost, and outcomes of postoperative delirium following major urologic cancer surgeries.

PURPOSE: Postoperative delirium (PD) is associated with poor outcomes and increased health care costs. The incidence, outcomes, and cost of delirium for major urologic cancer surgeries have not been previously characterized in a population-based analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a population-based, retrospective cohort study of patients with PD at 490 US hospitals between 2003 and 2013 to evaluate the incidence, outcomes, and cost of delirium after radical prostatectomy, radical nephrectomy, partial nephrectomy, and radical cystectomy (RC). Delirium was defined using ICD-9 codes in combination with postoperative antipsychotics, sitters, and restraints. Regression models were constructed to assess mortality, discharge disposition, length of stay (LOS), and direct hospital admission costs. Survey-weighted adjustment for hospital clustering achieved estimates generalizable to the US population. RESULTS: We identified 165,387 patients representing a weighted total of 1,097,355 patients. The overall incidence of PD was 2.7%, with the greatest incidence occurring after RC, with 6,268 cases (11%). Delirious patients had greater adjusted odds of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR] = 3.65, P<0.001), 90-day mortality (OR = 1.47, P = 0.013), discharge with home health services (OR = 2.25, P<0.001), discharge to skilled nursing facilities (OR = 4.64, P<0.001), and a 0.9-day increase in median LOS (P<0.001). Patients with delirium also experienced a $2,697 increase in direct admission costs (P<0.001), with the greatest costs incurred in RC patients ($30,859 vs. $26,607; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with PD after urologic cancer surgeries experienced worse outcomes, prolonged LOS, and increased admission costs. The greatest incidence and costs were seen after RC. Further research is warranted to identify high-risk patients and devise preventative strategies.

Frailty and geriatric assessment in urologic oncology.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: As the population ages, urologic oncologists are caring for older and more vulnerable patients that must withstand complex surgical treatments. Our healthcare environment emphasizes surgical quality, reductions in length of hospital stay, reduced readmission rates, and high patient satisfaction. So those who manage urologic malignancies must be able to optimize their patients. Understanding the concept of frailty, how to diagnose it in a timely and reliable manner, appreciate its perioperative impact, and consider interventions to reduce its effects may improve surgical outcomes. RECENT FINDINGS: There has been a recent swell of early research regarding frailty in urologic oncology and its related perioperative effects. Increasing degrees of frailty are associated with greater morbidity and mortality, and more adverse discharge disposition after surgical procedures. Clinicians are, thus, recognizing the value of geriatric assessment in their practice and exploring ways to integrate it using a team-based approach. Universal geriatric recommendations are now available in specific urologic populations to guide these efforts. Importantly, formal geriatric assessment outperforms physician discretion or the 'eyeball' test. SUMMARY: The current review offers a comprehensive study of the impact of frailty in urologic oncology, methods for its assessment, and active interventions to reduce it.

Prospective assessment of positioning-related pain in robotic urologic surgery.

This was a prospective study to assess positioning-related pain in 20 awake volunteers in the dorsal lithotomy (DL) and lateral decubitus (LD) positions. Each volunteer was put through the series of discrete, sequential steps used to achieve a final position; each step had two options. The Wong-Baker scale (WB) was used to rate pain for each option and the preferred option and ad lib comments were recorded. We found that awake volunteers could clearly and immediately distinguish differences in pain levels between position options. For the DL position, volunteers favored having the arms slightly flexed and pronated as opposed to being straight and supinated reflected by statistically less painful WB scores and option preference. Volunteers preferred having the neck flexed as opposed to being flat. For the LD position, volunteers reported statistically lower pain scores and preference for a foam roll for axilla support as opposed to a rolled blanket, the table flexed without the kidney rest as opposed to a raised kidney rest, and the over arm board as oppose to stacked blankets for contralateral arm support. Ad lib comments from the volunteers supported the above findings. To our knowledge, ours is the first study to demonstrate objective preferences for variations in surgical positioning using awake volunteers. This exercise with awake volunteers resulted in immediate changes in positioning for real robotic surgery patients in our practice.

Hospital Readmissions After Urological Surgical Procedures in France: A Nationwide Cohort Study over 3 Years.

BACKGROUND: Identifying the predictive factors for hospital readmission is required to target preventive measures. OBJECTIVE: To assess the rate of surgical readmissions after a urological procedure and the risk factors associated with readmission. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Data from all hospitalizations between January 2010 and November 2012 in France, regarding planned urological surgeries, were retrieved from the national medical database. To limit interactions between recent hospitalizations and surgical interventions, we selected only patients who were not hospitalized during the 12 mo preceding the urological procedure. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Primary outcome was the rate of readmissions within 30 d after urological surgery. The following risk factors for readmission were assessed: sex, age, diagnosis-related group, length of stay of initial hospitalization, type of hospitalization (conventional or day surgery), hospital volume activity, hospital volume for day surgery, and hospital status. Logistic regression multivariate analysis was used to assess risk factors. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Overall, 419 787 patients were included among whom 77 241 patients (18.40%) were readmitted within the following 30 d. After multivariate analyses, male sex (odds ratio [OR]=1.84, confidence interval [CI] 95%: 1.81-1.88), high level of comorbidity (diagnosis-related group 3-4 vs 1-2: OR=2.14, CI 95%: 2.10-2.21), and initial management in a private hospital (private vs university hospital: OR=1.13, CI 95%: 1.11-1.16; private vs public general hospital: OR=1.21, CI 95%: 1.18-1.23) were associated with a higher risk of readmission within 30 d. CONCLUSIONS: Reported readmission rate within 30 d after a planned a urological procedure was nearly 20%. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this French national study, we investigated the readmission rate within 30 d after a planned urological procedure in a large French population and discovered it was nearly 20%.