Comparison of Work Relative Value Units Assigned to Urological and Gynecological Surgical Procedures.

INTRODUCTION: We sought to determine if work relative value unit differences exist between analogous, sex-specific procedures. METHODS: Representatives from the AUA and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists independently reviewed the entire procedural code set and identified sex-specific procedures that had an analogous procedure in the opposite sex. These pairs were then evaluated and compared using current American Medical Association Relative Value Scale Update Committee methodology. Comparable code pair values were then examined to determine any systemic bias in the work relative value units assigned between the procedures. Mean differences and 95% confidence intervals were used to determine any differences in procedure or physician time values. The methodology used considered global period, intraservice time, total time, hospital days, postoperative office visits, and the date of the committee review. RESULTS: Of the 10 directly analogous code pairs reviewed, 7 of the female procedures had higher work relative value unit differences (range 0.29-6.47), and 3 of the male procedures had higher work relative value unit differences (range 1.23-2.34). There was no statistical difference between the code pair work relative value units. The work relative value unit per minute of intraservice time and total time were not statistically different. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we compared operative procedures performed in women with clinically comparable operative procedures performed in men that had similar surgical approaches, global periods, and valuation methodologies. Overall, no statistical differences in work relative value units were demonstrated.

Demographic and Socioeconomic Factors Associated with Urinary Stone Disease Management in a Large Urban US Population.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the influence of socioeconomic parameters on urinary stone surgeries. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study analyzed patients undergoing urolithiasis surgery in our community network hospital in North Carolina from 2005-2018. RESULTS: Of 7731 patients, 2160 (28%), 5,174 (67%), and 397 (5%) underwent SWL, URS, and PCNL, respectively. A higher proportion of Whites underwent URS (67%) and SWL (74%) than PCNL (56%); whereas a larger percentage of Blacks underwent PCNL (24%) than URS (20%) and SWL (15%) groups (P <.001). Private insurance payers were greater in the SWL (95%) group than URS (80%) and PCNL (81%) (P <.001). The distribution of median income was significantly different amongst the 3 surgeries with higher income classes overutilizing SWL and underutilizing PCNL compared to lower income classes (P <.001). In linear regression modeling, the proportion of SWL in a postal code was positively associated with median income (R2=0.55, P <.001); URS and PCNL were negatively associated with median income (R2=0.40, P <.001 and R2=0.41, P <.001, respectively). On multivariate logistic regression modeling, Blacks were significantly more likely to undergo PCNL than Whites (aOR 1.32, 95% CI 1.01-1.74 P <.050). Private insurance payers were more likely to undergo SWL (aOR 11.0, 95% CI 7.26-16.8, P <.0001) than public insurance payers. Patients in higher median income brackets are significantly less likely to undergo PCNL than those in the <$40,000 income bracket (P <.0001). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that socioeconomic status impacts urolithiasis surgical management, underscoring disparity recognition importance in endourologic care and ensuring appropriate surgical care regardless of socioeconomic status.

How uro-oncology has been affected by COVID-19 emergency? Data from Piedmont/Valle d'Aosta Oncological Network, Italy.

INTRODUCTION: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has dramatically hit all Europe and Northern Italy in particular. The reallocation of medical resources has caused a sharp reduction in the activity of many medical disciplines, including urology. The restricted availability of resources is expected to cause a delay in the treatment of urological cancers and to negatively influence the clinical history of many cancer patients. In this study, we describe COVID-19 impact on uro-oncological management in Piedmont/Valle d'Aosta, estimating its future impact. METHODS: We performed an online survey in 12 urological centers, belonging to the Oncological Network of Piedmont/Valle d'Aosta, to estimate the impact of COVID-19 emergency on their practice. On this basis, we then estimated the medical working capacity needed to absorb all postponed uro-oncological procedures. RESULTS: Most centers (77%) declared to be "much"/"very much" affected by COVID-19 emergency. If uro-oncological consultations for newly diagnosed cancers were often maintained, follow-up consultations were more than halved or even suspended in around two out of three centers. In-office and day-hospital procedures were generally only mildly reduced, whereas major uro-oncological procedures were more than halved or even suspended in 60% of centers. To clear waiting list backlog, the urological working capacity should dramatically increase in the next months; delays greater than 1 month are expected for more than 50% of uro-oncological procedures. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 emergency has dramatically slowed down uro-oncological activity in Piedmont and Valle d'Aosta. Ideally, uro-oncological patients should be referred to COVID-19-free tertiary urological centers to ensure a timely management.

Effect of SARS and COVID-19 outbreaks on urology practice and training.

INTRODUCTION: The objective was to investigate the changes in urology practice during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic with a perspective from our experience with severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in 2003. METHODS: Institutional data from all urology centres in the Hong Kong public sector during the COVID-19 pandemic (1 Feb 2020-31 Mar 2020) and a non-COVID-19 control period (1 Feb 2019-31 Mar 2019) were acquired. An online anonymous questionnaire was used to gauge the impact of COVID-19 on resident training. The clinical output of tertiary centres was compared with data from the SARS period. RESULTS: The numbers of operating sessions, clinic attendance, cystoscopy sessions, prostate biopsy, and shockwave lithotripsy sessions were reduced by 40.5%, 28.5%, 49.6%, 44.8%, and 38.5%, respectively, across all the centres reviewed. The mean numbers of operating sessions before and during the COVID-19 pandemic were 85.1±30.3 and 50.6±25.7, respectively (P=0.005). All centres gave priority to cancer-related surgeries. Benign prostatic hyperplasia-related surgery (39.1%) and ureteric stone surgery (25.5%) were the most commonly delayed surgeries. The degree of reduction in urology services was less than that during SARS (47.2%, 55.3%, and 70.5% for operating sessions, cystoscopy, and biopsy, respectively). The mean numbers of operations performed by residents before and during the COVID-19 pandemic were 75.4±48.0 and 34.9±17.2, respectively (P=0.002). CONCLUSION: A comprehensive review of urology practice during the COVID-19 pandemic revealed changes in every aspect of practice.

Postoperative assessment of nosocomial transmission of COVID-19 after robotic surgical procedures during the pandemic.

OBJECTIVES: To assess potential nosocomial coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) transmission in patients who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic procedures during the pandemic. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective study in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopy in urology or gynaecology within 2 academic hospitals. Patients underwent local preoperative COVID-19 screening using a symptoms questionnaire. Patients with suspicious screening underwent coronavirus real time-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and were excluded from robotic surgery if positive. Patients with symptoms postsurgery were systematically tested for coronavirus by RT-PCR. One-month postsurgery, all patients had a telephone consultation to evaluate COVID-19 symptoms. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients underwent robotic surgery during the study period (median age: 63-years [IQR: 53-70], 1.8 male: female ratio). Oncology was the main indication for robotic surgery (n = 62, 91.2%) and 26 patients (38.2%) received a chest CT-scan prior to surgery. Eleven patients (16.2%) were symptomatic after surgery of whom only 1 tested positive for coronavirus by RT-PCR (1.5%) and was transferred to COVID-19 unit with no life-threatening condition. No attending surgeon was diagnosed with COVID-19 during the study. CONCLUSIONS: Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery seemed safe in the era of COVID-19 as long as all recommended precautions are followed. The rate of nosocomial COVID-19 transmission was extremely low despite the fact that we only used RT-PCR testing in symptomatic patients during the preoperative work-up. Larger cohort is needed to validate these results.

Global change of surgical and oncological clinical practice in urology during early COVID-19 pandemic.

OBJECTIVES: While the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic captures healthcare resources worldwide, data on the impact of prioritization strategies in urology during pandemic are absent. We aimed to quantitatively assess the global change in surgical and oncological clinical practice in the early COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: In this cross-sectional observational study, we designed a 12-item online survey on the global effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on clinical practice in urology. Demographic survey data, change of clinical practice, current performance of procedures, and current commencement of treatment for 5 conditions in medical urological oncology were evaluated. RESULTS: 235 urologists from 44 countries responded. Out of them, 93% indicated a change of clinical practice due to COVID-19. In a 4-tiered surgery down-escalation scheme, 44% reported to make first cancellations, 23% secondary cancellations, 20% last cancellations and 13% emergency cases only. Oncological surgeries had low cancellation rates (%): transurethral resection of bladder tumor (27%), radical cystectomy (21-24%), nephroureterectomy (21%), radical nephrectomy (18%), and radical orchiectomy (8%). (Neo)adjuvant/palliative treatment is currently not started by more than half of the urologists. COVID-19 high-risk-countries had higher total cancellation rates for non-oncological procedures (78% vs. 68%, p = 0.01) and were performing oncological treatment for metastatic diseases at a lower rate (35% vs. 48%, p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic has affected clinical practice of 93% of urologists worldwide. The impact of implementing surgical prioritization protocols with moderate cancellation rates for oncological surgeries and delay or reduction in (neo)adjuvant/palliative treatment will have to be evaluated after the pandemic.

Implementation of Postoperative Standard Opioid Prescribing Schedules Reduces Opioid Prescriptions Without Change in Patient-reported Pain Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To implement Standard Opioid Prescribing Schedules (SOPS) based on opioid use following urologic surgeries and to evaluate how evidence-based prescribing schedules affect opioid use and patient reported outcomes. METHODS: Patients who underwent urologic surgeries within 6 procedure subtypes at UNC Health during the 2 study time periods ("pre-SOPS": 7/2017-1/2018, "post-SOPS": 7/2018-1/2019) were invited to complete a survey analyzing postoperative opioid usage, storage and disposal, and patient reported outcomes (including pain interference using a validated questionnaire). A pharmacy database provided medication prescribing data and patient demographics. During the pre-SOPS time period, baseline outcomes were measured. Following the pre-SOPS period, usage amounts were analyzed and Standard Opioid Prescribing Schedules were developed to guide prescriptions during the post-SOPS period. Descriptive summary statistics and appropriate t test or r2 were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 438 patients within 6 procedure types completed the survey (pre-SOPS: 282 patients, post-SOPS: 156 patients). Pre-SOPS, patients were prescribed significantly more 5-mg oxycodone tablets than used (20.9 vs 7.8, P <.001). Post-SOPS, compared to pre-SOPS amounts, patients were prescribed significantly fewer tablets (12.7 vs 20.9, P <.001) and used fewer tablets (5.3 vs 7.8, P = .003). No difference was observed in pain interference (average t-score (standard deviation): 54.33 (10.9) pre-SOPS vs 55.89 (9.1) post-SOPS, P = .125) or patient satisfaction (95% pre-SOPS vs 94% post-SOPS). CONCLUSION: Adherence to data-driven postoperative opioid prescribing schedules reduce opioid prescriptions and use without compromising pain interference or patient satisfaction. These results have important implications for urologists' ability to decrease opioid prescriptions and fight the opioid epidemic.

Factors attributable to the cancellation of programmed surgeries.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the factors attributable to the cancellation of surgeries of a third level health institution in the city of Valledupar, Cesar / Colombia (2017-2018). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Descriptive, retrospective, cross-sectional study. Data from the hospital surgical unit adverse case file were collected for 6 surgical specialties. RESULTS: They showed that in 2017 there was a surgical suspension of 4% of the total of scheduled surgeries that were (3339), for 2018 the rate was 3% with a total of scheduled surgeries (1733). The reason for the suspension for both periods was the factor related to the patient's adverse conditions with 45.9 and 38.5% respectively. The specialty most affected for these cases was the specialty of general surgery with the same percentage value in both periods of 4%. CONCLUSION: The results give us an idea of the factors present for the cancellation of scheduled surgeries and the need to apply measures to guarantee patient safety.

OBJETIVO: Analizar los factores atribuibles a la cancelación de cirugías de una institución de salud de tercer nivel en la ciudad de Valledupar, Cesar, Colombia (2017-2018). MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Estudio descriptivo, retrospectivo, transversal. Se recopilaron datos del archivo de casos adversos de la unidad quirúrgica del hospital para 6 especialidades quirúrgicas. RESULTADOS: Mostraron que en 2017 hubo una suspensión quirúrgica del 4% del total de cirugías programadas que fueron (3339), para 2018 la tasa fue del 3% con un total de cirugías programadas (1733). La razón de la suspensión para ambos períodos fue el factor relacionado con las condiciones adversas del paciente con 45.9 y 38.5% respectivamente. La especialidad más afectada para estos casos fue la especialidad de cirugía general con el mismo valor porcentual en ambos períodos del 4%. CONCLUSIÓN: Los resultados nos dan una idea de los factores presentes para la cancelación de cirugías programadas y la necesidad de aplicar medidas para garantizar la seguridad del paciente.

RUC Operative Time Estimates are Inaccurate, Resulting in Decreased Work RVU Assignments for Longer Urologic Procedures.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether inaccurate operative time estimates utilized by the Relative Value Update Committee (RUC) contribute to the undervaluation of longer urologic procedures. METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) data sets were reviewed from 2015 to 2017. NSQIP operative time is directly measured, contrasting with CMS times which are determined by the RUC via survey-generated estimates. The 50 most frequently coded urology current procedural terminologies were included. Operative time difference was compared between the 2 data sets, and Spearman's correlation coefficient was utilized to assess differences in wRVU/h. RESULTS: A total of 105,931 cases were included. Overall, RUC operative time estimates were longer than NSQIP (124.4 vs 103.5 minutes, P < .001). RUC data overestimated operative time by 42.9% for procedures ≤90 minutes and 16.4% for longer procedures (P < .001). Using NSQIP, procedures ≤90 minutes had higher wRVU/h than longer procedures (12.2 vs 8.7, P < .001), but this was not statistically different using RUC estimates (8.4 vs 7.7, P = .13). Spearman's correlation coefficient confirmed a statistically significant negative relationship between wRVU/h and operative time using NSQIP data (r = -0.57, 95% confidence interval: -7.4 to -0.36), and no statistically significant relationship using RUC data (r = -0.24, 95% confidence interval: -0.49 to 0.04). CONCLUSION: The RUC-intended wRVU/h is more equitable than the NSQIP real-world wRVU/h with regard to operative time. Inaccurate RUC operative time estimates contribute to the undervaluation of longer urologic procedures.

Correlation of Relative Value Units With Surgical Complexity and Physician Workload in Urology.

OBJECTIVE: To define the relationship between urology relative value units (RVUs) and measures of surgical complexity and physician workload. Secondary objectives include: (1) identifying procedures with outlying RVU values for their measures of surgical complexity and workload; and (2) calculating projected RVU values for these procedures. METHODS: We obtained surgical case data for 71 urology current procedural terminology (CPT) codes from the 2017 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to measure the association between mean total work RVU and operative time, length of hospital stay, serious adverse events, readmissions, and mortality. We developed a multivariable regression model to predict mean total work RVU from these measures. Studentized residuals were used to identify outlying CPT codes for both bivariable and multivariable regression models, and empirically derived RVU values from complexity and work effort metrics were estimated. RESULTS: We analyzed 71 urology CPT codes encompassing 55,068 cases. RVUs correlated well with median length of hospital stay (R = 0.81), median operative time (R = 0.92), serious adverse events (R = 0.83), and readmissions (R = 0.74). RVUs were poorly correlated with mortality (R = 0.34). Outlying procedures identified using the multivariable model were retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (projected +21.09 RVUs), laparoscopic ureteroneocystotomy (projected -12.34 RVUs), and cystectomy with bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy (projected +9.37 RVUs). CONCLUSION: Urology work RVUs correlate more with operative time than other measures of surgical complexity and physician workload. There exist several significant outlying procedures for various work measures. Incorporating objective work data may improve RVU assignments in the future.

Variation in the utilization of robotic surgical operations.

The appropriate use of the robot in surgery continues to evolve. Robotic operations (RO) are particularly advantageous for deep pelvic and retroperitoneal procedures, but the implementation of RO is unknown. We aimed to examine regional variation for the most commonly performed RO in general, gynecologic, and urologic surgery. A three-state inpatient database from 2008 to 2011 was used. Nine common robotic inpatient general, gynecologic and urologic surgery procedures were analyzed. States were divided into hospital service areas (HSAs). The percentage of RO was calculated for each operation. Hospital service areas that had < 50% or > 150% of the RO average were outliers. Hospital service areas were compared based on demographics, patterns of adoption, variation in usage, and association with population, physician and hospital density. Hysterectomies were the procedure that was performed most often robotically. Over 50% of radical prostatectomies were performed robotically. Procedures with the highest rate of RO performance were performed with the least variation. Characteristics that were significantly correlated with RO included provider and hospital density. Variation in the utilization of RO is common and differs by operation. Physician density impacts access to care and is associated with the variation in use of RO depending on procedure type. Further research is needed to understand the causes of variation and adoption of RO.

Trends in urethral stricture management over two decades.

OBJECTIVES: To identify trends in the management of urethral stricture disease in Australia, assess changes in the standard of care, and examine the availability of genitourinary reconstructive surgery. METHODS: Data on eight stricture management procedures were collected online via Medicare Item Reports from the Australian Government Department of Human Services, and then matched to population data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics. A survey was disseminated via the Urological Society of Australia and New Zealand (USANZ) asking whether active members performed urethroplasty and whether this was done in a rural, regional or metropolitan setting. RESULTS: Over a 22-year period, there were 140 540 endoscopic procedures and 5136 urethroplasties, with 27.4 endoscopic procedures per urethroplasty. From 1994 to 2016, the per capita number of passage of sounds and dilatation procedures decreased by 74% and 75%, respectively, with increases in use of optical urethrotomy of 70% and in single-stage urethroplasty of 144%. Overall, the ratio of all endoscopic procedures vs urethroplasty decreased from 58.9 to 16.8. There were as few as 16 surgeons in the USANZ performing urethroplasty, with seven providing this service in regional areas. Seven had formal fellowship training. CONCLUSION: There has been a clear shift from repetitive endoscopic procedures towards urethroplasty, but the former still make up the majority of interventions. This may be explained by patients not being referred for urethroplasty earlier in the course of disease and there appears to be a gap in genitourinary reconstructive expertise in regional and rural areas.

The LACE+ Index as a Predictor of 30-Day Patient Outcomes in a Urologic Surgery Population: A Coarsened Exact Match Study.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the potential of LACE+ scores, in patients undergoing urologic surgery, to predict short-term undesirable outcomes. METHODS: Coarsened exact matching was used to assess the predictive value of the LACE+ index among all urologic surgery cases over a 2-year period (2016-2018) at 1 health system (n = 9824). Study subjects were matched on characteristics not assessed by LACE+, including duration of surgery and race, among others. For comparison of outcomes, matched populations were compared by LACE+ quartile with Q4 as the referent group: Q4 vs Q1, Q4 vs Q2, Q4 vs Q3. RESULTS: Seven hundred and twenty-two patients were matched for Q1-Q4; 1120 patients were matched for Q2-Q4; 2550 patients were matched for Q3-Q4. Escalating LACE+ score significantly predicted increased readmission (2.86% vs 4.91% for Q2 vs Q4; P = .012) and Emergency Room (ER) visits at 30 days postop (5.69% vs 11.37% for Q1 vs Q4, 4.11% vs 11.45% for Q2 vs Q4, 8.29% vs 13.32% for Q3 vs Q4; P <.001 for all). Increasing LACE score did not predict reoperation within 30 days or rate of death over follow-up within 30 postoperative days. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that the LACE+ index is suitable as a prediction model for important patient outcomes in a urologic surgery population including unanticipated readmission and ER evaluation.

Long-Term Assessment of a Prospective Cohort of Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy.

OBJECTIVE: To report long-term outcomes after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. METHODS: We conducted a prospective descriptive cohort study on 331 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for symptomatic prolapse (Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification [POP-Q] system stage 2 or greater) at one center, with minimum 1.5 years of follow-up by April 30, 2014. Primary outcome measures were Patient Global Impression of Change score and failure at the apex (C≥-1 cm; POP-Q stage 2 or greater). Secondary outcomes were anatomical failure in other compartments, duration of follow-up, occurrence and time point of complications, reinterventions, and functional outcomes by response to a standardized 24-question interview on prolapse and bladder, bowel, and sexual function. Assessment was by an experienced clinician not involved in patient management. RESULTS: The follow-up rate was 84.6% (280/331); 185 of 331 (55.9%) patients were both physically examined and interviewed, and 95 of 331 (25.7%) were interviewed only. The median age at interview was 72 years (interquartile range 13 years), with a follow-up period of 85.5 months (interquartile range 46 months). Approximately 83% (231/280) reported improvement; 5.7% (16/280) were unchanged, 5.7% (16/280) felt slightly worse, and 6.8% (17/280) reported clear deterioration. Anatomical failure at point-C was 8.6% (16/185); anterior (22.2%, 41/185) and posterior (28.6%, 53/185) prolapse were more common than apical prolapse. Of those with level-I anatomical cure, 10.1% (17/185) felt worse; half of them (9/17) because of prolapse in another compartment. The others had urinary problems (41.2%, 7/17), obstructive defecation (11.8%, 2/17), or dyspareunia (11.8%, 2/17). Conversely, the majority of patients with recurrence at the vault (62.5%, 10/16) self-reported to be improved. The reoperation rate was 17.8% (48/270), including 19 (7.0%) for graft-related complications and nine (3.3%) for prolapse. CONCLUSION: More than four out of five patients (82.5%) felt improved 86 months after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Of those not improved, two thirds had recurrent prolapse; however, typically mid-vaginal. The other third reported urinary or bowel problems or dyspareunia. Reintervention for prolapse was 3.3%. The most common reasons for reoperation were graft-related complications (7.0%) and urinary incontinence (6.7%).

Hospital Charges for Urologic Surgery Episodes of Care Are Rising Despite Declining Costs.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the temporal relationship of hospital charges relative to recorded costs for surgical episodes of care. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study selected individuals who underwent any of 8 index urologic surgical procedures at 392 unique institutions from January 1, 2005, through December 31, 2015. For each surgical encounter, cost and charge data reported by hospitals were extracted and adjusted to 2016 US dollars. Trend analysis and multivariable logistic regression modeling were used to assess outcomes. The primary outcome was trend in median charge and cost. Secondary outcomes consisted of hospital characteristics associated with membership in the highest quartile of institutional charge-to-cost ratio. RESULTS: Cohort-level median cost per encounter trended down from $6824 in 2005 to $5586 in 2015 (P for trend<.001), and charges increased from $20,210 to $25,773 during the same period (P for trend<.001). Hospitals in the highest quartile of institutional charge-to-cost ratio were more likely to be safety net, nonteaching, urban, lower surgical volume, smaller, and located outside the Midwest (P<.001 for each characteristic). CONCLUSION: The pricing trends shown herein could indicate some success in cost-containment for surgical episodes of care, although higher hospital charges may be increasingly used to bolster reimbursement from third-party payers and to compensate for escalating costs in other areas.

Pathologic Specimens at Time of Pyeloplasty: Frequency and Practice Patterns.

OBJECTIVE: To assess national and regional practice patterns and rates of pathologic specimen identification sent at time of pyeloplasty, as well as project associated costs, we used a national administrative database. The rate at which the excised ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) is sent for pathologic identification is variable, arguably without a clear clinical purpose. MATERIALS / METHODS: Utilizing a national administrative database of privately insured patients, 1496 individual cases were identified using international classification of diseases (ICD) and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) coding. Patients from 0-18 years of age were included whose pyeloplasty was performed during 2010-2014. Patients who were and were not billed for pathologic identification at time of surgery were identified. Regional practice patterns and associated costs were determined. RESULTS: One thousand four hundred and ninety-six pyeloplasty cases were identified (68.2% males). Specimens were sent for pathologic identification in 827 cases (55%). Average age was 5.8 years for those without pathology and 4.6 years for those in whom a specimen was billed. Regionally, the Western United States was least likely to bill for surgical pathology (49%). The parental out-of-pocket payment for the encounter was on average $1518 for cases in which pathology was sent and $1398 for those cases for which no pathology bill was identified. CONCLUSION: Pediatric pyeloplasty is a common surgical procedure for which a pathologic specimen is sent in as many as 55% of cases in this cohort. Regional differences exist across the country and there is an associated slightly higher out-of-pocket cost in cases for which pathologic specimens are sent at time of pyeloplasty.