Strength of public preferences for endovascular or open aortic aneurysm repair.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated public preferences for the treatment processes for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in order to allow them to be incorporated into a cost-effectiveness analysis. METHODS: This was a telephone survey using a trade-off method in UK resident adults (aged at least 18 years) with no previous diagnosis of a vascular condition. RESULTS: Some 167 of 209 participants (79·9 per cent) stated that they would prefer endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), 40 (19·1 per cent) preferred open surgery and two (1·0 per cent) stated no preference. Participants preferred EVAR because of the less invasive nature of the intervention and quicker recovery. Participants preferring open surgery cited reasons such as having a single follow-up appointment, and a procedure that felt more permanent. When participants were asked to make a sacrifice in order to have their preferred treatment, 122 (58·4 per cent) favoured EVAR, 18 (8·6 per cent) favoured open surgery and 69 (33·0 per cent) had no preference. Those preferring EVAR were willing to give up a mean of 0·135 expected quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) to have EVAR, compared with a willingness to give up 0·033 expected QALYs among those preferring open repair. CONCLUSION: These results indicate a clear preference for EVAR over open surgery for aortic aneurysm.

ANTECEDENTES: Este estudio evaluó las preferencias de la opinion pública en relación a las opciones de tratamiento para la reparación del aneurisma de aorta abdominal, con el objetivo de que dichas preferencias se puedan incorporar en un análisis de coste-efectividad. MÉTODOS: Se realizó una encuesta telefónica utilizando el método trade-off (solución de intercambio) en adultos residentes en el Reino Unido (mayores de 18 años) sin diagnóstico previo de enfermedad vascular. RESULTADOS: Un total de 167 (79,9%) de 209 participantes declararon que preferirían la reparación endovascular del aneurisma (endovascular aneurysm repair, EVAR), 40 (19,1%) prefirieron cirugía abierta y dos (1,0%) no tenían preferencia. Los participantes prefirieron el EVAR debido a la naturaleza menos invasiva de la intervención y a tiempos de recuperación más rápidos. Los participantes que preferían la cirugía abierta mencionaron como razones tener una única visita de seguimiento y consideraron que se trataba de un procedimiento más permanente. Cuando se pidió a los participantes que para recibir su tratamiento preferido hicieran un intercambio, 122 (58,4%) se decantaron por la EVAR, 18 (8,6%) por la cirugía abierta y 69 (33%) no tuvieron preferencia. Los que prefirieron EVAR estaban dispuestos a renunciar a una media de 0,135 años de vida ajustados por calidad (QALYs) esperados con tal de recibir una EVAR en comparación con la renuncia de 0,033 QALYs esperada entre quienes preferían la reparación abierta. CONCLUSIÓN: Estos resultados indican una clara preferencia por la EVAR sobre la cirugía abierta, lo que está en desacuerdo con la reciente recomendación de NICE de que la EVAR no debe recomendarse como una opción de tratamiento. Los hallazgos sugieren que se debe prestar mayor atención a las características del proceso de tratamiento. Al no incorporar explícitamente tales preferencias en el proceso de toma de decisiones, NICE corre el riesgo de recomendar opciones de tratamiento que son contrarias a las preferencias de la población del Reino Unido.

Evaluation of Qualitative Outcomes after Surgical Intervention on Patients Affected by Arteriovenous Malformations.

BACKGROUND: Arteriovenous malformations are abnormal tangles of blood vessels that cause irregular connections between arteries and veins. Rupture of arteriovenous malformations represents a frequent complication associated with a neurological impairment and physical disability. METHODS: We investigated the relationship among coping dimensions and overall quality of life (QoL), and health status after surgical intervention in 20 patients affected by arteriovenous malformations. Each patient was administered a battery of self-report questionnaires (Short Form 12 Health Survey Questionnaire, Brief COPE Inventory, Beck Depression Inventory, and Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety). RESULTS: We found that surgical treatment of arteriovenous malformations affected subjective well-being and emotional aspects. Coping ability influenced the QoL and the presence of anxiety and depressive symptoms. We found a significant correlation between depression and humor (r = -.47, P = .03) and between QoL and self-distraction (r = -.48, P = .03) and humor (r = .44, P = .05). In particular, humor was a significant predictor of mental health and physical health. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of anxiety and depression was the cause of deterioration of QoL, even if psychological resources used to deal with the disease significantly modified the subjective perception of well-being. The evaluation of the impact of cerebrovascular disease on QoL should be a basis for planning and evaluating therapeutic and psychological rehabilitative interventions.

Patient Experiences of Life Years After Severe Civilian Lower Extremity Trauma With Vascular Injury.

OBJECTIVE: Severe lower limb trauma with arterial injury is often devastating for the individual. Many studies describe how to manage these injuries when they occur. Short-term functional outcome is quite well described, but the patients are often young, and their suffering is physical, mental, and social from a lifelong perspective. The aim of this study was to report patient experiences of their lives several years after their accidents, and to explore mechanisms of how to improve management. METHOD: The Swedvasc registry was searched for participants from 1987 to 2011, living in the region of Uppsala, Sweden. Some amputated participants were added from the Walking Rehabilitation Center. There were five reconstructed patients with an intact limb, and three with amputations. In depth interviews were conducted and systematically analyzed, using A Giorgi's descriptive phenomenological method. RESULTS: Eight patients participated, five with reconstructed and three with amputated limbs. Life affecting functional impairments were described by all patients. The patients undergoing amputation had received more structured follow up and support through the Walking Rehabilitation Center. The satisfaction with the cosmetic result was poorer than expected. All patients had developed strategies of how to cope with their impairments and stated they now lived "normal lives." CONCLUSIONS: Despite substantial physical, psychological, and cosmetic impairments years after severe lower limb trauma, the participants described life as "normal" and mainly satisfactory. Transition to the new situation could have been facilitated by more frequent and continuous follow up after discharge from hospital, in particular among the non-amputated patients who tend to be lost to follow up. Findings also indicate that family members have to be acknowledged, strengthened, and supported.

Quality of Life in Patients Suffering from Critical Limb Ischemia.

BACKGROUND: Various treatment options exist for patients suffering from critical limb ischemia (CLI). These options consist of endovascular procedures, surgical revascularization, primary amputation, or conservative therapy. The effect of the treatment is traditionally focused on outcomes, such as primary patency and limb salvage, though quality of life (QoL) is considered an important additional primary end point in a more patient-oriented healthcare system. The aim of this systematic review is to explore the best clinical decision making possible, to increase QoL in CLI patients. METHODS: This review is based on a systematic electronic literature search using the PubMed and EMBASE databases. Articles evaluating QoL in patients with CLI were selected for further analysis. Only prospective studies, written in English, describing QoL and health status (HS) after endovascular or surgical revascularization, amputation or conservative therapy were considered for inclusion. Treatment results were divided into short-term (≤3-month follow-up) and long-term results (≥1-year follow-up) to achieve a clear view of the QoL in patients suffering for CLI patients. RESULTS: Twenty-five articles describing HS in patients suffering from CLI were included. It was found that while most of these articles reported HS of patients, rarely did they report on QoL. As a result, it is difficult to determine the best treatment to increase HS as studies that focus on the comparison of treatment modalities are lacking. All 4 treatment modalities can raise HS in the short and the long terms; however, endovascular and surgical revascularization seem to positively effect HS the most. QoL results are lacking in both the short and long terms. CONCLUSIONS: All treatment methods included in the study resulted in an increase in patients' HS in both short and long terms. More comparative studies with inclusion of all different treatments of CLI are needed to assist in clinical decision making and perform tailored interventions for the individual patient. QoL and HS are confusingly used in current international literature with abundant HS research. To take patients individual opinions more into account, focus on QoL research is needed to designate the superior treatment in patients suffering from CLI.

Preferences of patients, their family caregivers and vascular surgeons in the choice of abdominal aortic aneurysms treatment options: the PREFER study.

OBJECTIVE: Factors influencing the choice between endovascular (endovascular aneurysm repair, EVAR) and open repair (OPEN) of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) are of increasing interest. We quantified their importance among the different subjects involved in the treatment. METHODS: Pre- and postoperative patients (pts), their relatives and vascular surgeons completed questionnaires evaluating six treatment characteristics: anaesthesia; recovery time to basic everyday activities; risk of re-intervention at 5 years (RR); complexity of follow-up; risk of major complications; and additional cost of intervention (AC). Through a discrete choice experiment, hypothetical scenarios of treatment were obtained and the relative importance (RI) of each characteristic was determined through a conditional logistic regression model. RESULTS: A total of 160 pts, 102 relatives and 30 surgeons from nine centres completed the questionnaires. Major complications and re-intervention risk were the most important characteristics (RI = 56.0% and 27.2%, respectively) for all the respondent categories. Pts and their relatives considered very important also a possible out-of-pocket AC. Recovery time and type of anaesthesia were among the least important characteristics, including hospital additional cost for surgeons. The different categories of respondents showed different opinions towards different treatment characteristics depending also on possible previous treatment. CONCLUSION: Preferences for AAA treatment characteristics differ between groups of involved subjects. Understanding individuals' preferences could help in optimising treatment benefits.

[Assessment of quality of life in patients with recurrent varicosity].

The present study was aimed at assessing the patients' perception of the remote outcomes obtained after treatment for relapsing varicose disease. The patients treated for recurrent varicosity in 2007-2009 at the Minsk Municipal Centre for Vascular Surgery were encouraged to fill in the Chronic Venous Insufficiency Questionnaire (CIVIQ-2). The Questionnaire had been sent by post to a total of 67 operated patients, with the answers received from 40 (60%) subjects. The mean duration of the postoperative period amounted to 29.78 months. An excellent surgical outcome (i. е., no varicose veins present) was observed in seven responders, a satisfactory one was noted in sixteen patients (a minor, symptom-free relapse), an unsatisfactory outcome was noted in eleven subjects (a symptomatic relapse), and a poor one--in six. 57.9% of the patients considered their result as excellent to satisfactory and 42.1% turned out to be dissatisfied with the outcomes of the surgical intervention performed. The median of the CIVIQ-2 score in the group of the patients with satisfactory postoperative results amounted to 55.50 points [interquartile range (IQR) 27-87] as compared with 66.60 points (IQR 28-90) in the cohort of the patients dissatisfied with the therapeutic outcomes (P=0.009, Wilcoxon test). Hence, on average 29.78 months after surgery for a relapse of varicose disease, two thirds of the patients turned out to be satisfied with the outcomes of the treatment performed, with the remaining one third of the patients having remained dissatisfied therewith. Based on these findings, a conclusion was drawn that in all cases it is necessary to advise the patients presenting with varicose disease of possible long-term sequelae of the operation and possible development of recurrent varicosity.

[Assessment of mental condition and anxiety in patients receiving neuroendovascular treatment].

OBJECTIVE: Neuroendovascular treatment (NET) is an effective and minimally invasive procedure used for patients with vascular disease of the central nervous system. The purpose of this study was to examine anxiety levels using standardized psychometric tools and an original questionnaire among patients before and after NET. METHOD: A total of 40 patients who underwent NET were included. There were 18 patients with unruptured cerebral aneurysm, 18 with carotid stenosis, and 4 other cases. Patients were asked to complete a State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and also to fill out a questionnaire about perioperative anxiety. It elicited the following information: (a) state-anxiety score and level before and after NET; (b) trait-anxiety score and level before and after NET; and (c) perioperative anxiety about NET. In all cases, the procedure was performed under local anesthesia. RESULTS: The preprocedural state-anxiety score was high in many patients (82%). The principal cause of the preprocedural anxiety was the procedure-related complications (92%). Patients with cerebral aneurysm experienced anxiety during the procedure because they could not know which stage of the procedure was involved. Their state-anxiety score was improved in the postprocedural examination (88%). However, patients were still anxious about postoperative complications and recurrence, particularly those with cerebral aneurysm. Patients with cerebral aneurysm generally tended to experience a higher level of anxiety than those with carotid stenosis. CONCLUSION: Though NET is apt to be thought as a relatively easy procedure, patients actually felt much anxiety, especially those with cerebral aneurysm. Due care for perioperative anxiety in patients who undergo NET is important.

Major lower extremity amputation after multiple revascularizations: was it worth it?

Lower extremity revascularization is often described as excessively lesion-centric, with insufficient focus on the patient. We investigated patients' perspectives of multiple procedures for limb salvage that culminated in major lower extremity amputation. A prospective vascular surgery database was queried from January 2000 to December 2005 for patients who had undergone below-knee (BKA) or above-knee (AKA) amputation after failed lower extremity revascularization. Patients were surveyed via telephone by a vascular nurse regarding thoughts on undergoing multiple procedures for limb salvage, involvement in decision making, functional status (work, meal preparation, shopping, driving), use of prosthesis, and independence. The Social Security Death Index was utilized to verify patient survival. Amputations for infection were excluded. Seventy-eight patients underwent AKA or BKA after failed revascularization. Forty-six patients (59%) were alive at 5 years. Thirteen patients were lost to follow-up, leaving 33 available for survey. A total of 142 lower extremity revascularizations (median = 4/patient) were performed on these patients including 94 surgical bypasses (median = 3/patient) and 48 percutaneous interventions (median = 1/patient). Eighty-five percent (28 of 33 patients) of amputees surveyed would do everything to save the leg if faced with a similar scenario, regardless of the number of procedures. Fifty-four percent (18/33) of patients actively used a prosthesis, and 91% (30/33) resided at home. In retrospect, patients are willing to undergo multiple revascularizations--percutaneous or open--to attempt limb salvage even if the eventual result is major amputation. Independence and functional status appear to be obtainable in a majority of patients. Patient-oriented outcomes are necessary to guide revascularization, whether it is by a percutaneous or open technique.

The Vascular Project: using data to improve processes and outcomes.

Fiscal accountability by health care providers has become a theme in health care delivery systems; however, evaluation of outcomes on the basis of cost alone may minimize the importance of patient needs and the quality of the care delivered. Mechanisms related to resource identification and allocation has to be driven by internal data and information systems that consider clinical, financial, administrative, and patient satisfaction data. This article will define processes, outcomes and outcomes measurement, and management. Various nursing-sensitive outcomes will be presented and their establishment, tracking, interpretation, and effect on the delivery of patient care in a newly opened vascular unit will be highlighted.

Quality vascular surgical care: the importance of innovation and change in an era of dwindling reimbursement.

BACKGROUND: Reductions in vascular surgery reimbursement emphasize the need to decrease cost while maintaining quality. Hospital solvency is essential if we are to preserve acceptable levels of nursing/support personnel and acquire new diagnostic and treatment programs. METHODS: Care processes for patients undergoing carotid, aortic, or dialysis access surgery were retrospectively analyzed and new quality- and cost-oriented treatment algorithms and clinical pathways were developed and implemented using case management principles. Preoperative risk stratification, length of stay, costs, complications, outcomes, and patient satisfaction were compared before and after these revisions in the care process. Statistical analyses were done using the Wilcoxon Rank sum test and Fisher exact test. RESULTS: Significant reductions in length of stay, intensive care use, and cost of treatment and diagnosis were achieved without adversely affecting morbidity, mortality, or patient satisfaction. CONCLUSION: Use of algorithm, clinical pathway, and case management principles resulted in a marked improvement in the "bottom line" for vascular surgical procedures in our academic medical center.