Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 87
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Womens Health (Larchmt) ; 31(7): 1003-1011, 2022 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34846930

RESUMO

Background: Many women with endometriosis experience chronic abdominal pain. Clinical guidelines recommend treatment with analgesics, contraceptive hormones, gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs, and surgery. Treatment patterns in women with endometriosis are not well characterized. Methods: Data from the IBM® MarketScan® Commercial Database were accessed from 2009 to 2017. One-year baseline and follow-up periods were defined around the date of the first claim with a diagnosis of endometriosis (the index date). Women 18-49 years of age on the index date with a diagnosis of endometriosis, continuous enrollment during baseline and follow-up, and pharmacy benefits were included. The following outcomes were analyzed descriptively: baseline comorbidities; medication use and surgeries; and sequence of treatment utilization in the baseline and the follow-up period. Results: A total of 190,921 women were included. The mean ± (standard deviation) age was 39.0 ± (7.3), and abdominal/pelvic pain (36.0%) and excessive or frequent menstruation (32.0%) were the most prevalent comorbidities. In the baseline period, the utilization of pharmacological treatment was: estrogen/progestin 42.5%, opioids 41.5%, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) 37.5%. In the follow-up period, utilization of opioids and NSAIDs increased to 68.9% and 51.1%, respectively, whereas the use of estrogen/progestin dropped to 23.8%. Surgeries were infrequent in the baseline period (6.3%). However, in the follow-up period, 27.9% of women underwent laparoscopy and 29.7% had a hysterectomy, with a total of 68.1% of the study population undergoing surgical treatment. Conclusions: A diagnosis of endometriosis is accompanied by an increase in the use of analgesics and surgical procedures. The diversity of treatments suggests a lack of clarity in management guidelines.


Assuntos
Endometriose , Seguro , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Endometriose/tratamento farmacológico , Endometriose/epidemiologia , Endometriose/cirurgia , Estrogênios/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Progestinas/uso terapêutico
2.
J Clin Pharm Ther ; 47(2): 228-236, 2022 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34704273

RESUMO

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Approximately half of the patients with threatened miscarriage suffer an abortion, and consistent medication therapy to prevent threatened miscarriage is lacking. Our goal was to investigate the real-world pharmacological treatment patterns of patients with threatened miscarriage in China, with a focus on the trend and rationality of progestogen use over the last 7 years. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of data from the Hospital Prescription Analysis Cooperation Project that is overseen by the Chinese Pharmaceutical Association. Information was extracted from prescriptions of outpatients with threatened miscarriage between January 2014 and December 2020. We quantified the types of medications using the first level anatomical therapeutic chemical (ATC) classification code and the frequency of use of medicines classified as category X by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). We also calculated the prevalence of the most frequently used progestogens by assessing prescription rates, determined the sum of the defined daily doses (DDDs) and defined daily cost (DDC) and evaluated the rationality of progestogens according to drug labels and guidelines. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Of the 91,464 patients included in this study, 69.4% were from the eastern region, 92.5% were from tertiary hospitals, and 72.9% were between 25 and 34 years old. The average number of medications per patient was 1.4. The following types of medicines were the most prevalent: "genitourinary system and sex hormones" (90.7%), "alimentary tract and metabolism" (10.8%) and "blood and blood-forming organs" (9.9%). Progestogens were prescribed for 81,080 patients (88.6%), among which oral progesterone (39.7%) was the most commonly used, followed by oral dydrogesterone (34.4%), progesterone injection (26.0%), oral allylestrenol (0.7%) and progesterone gel (0.4%). In other words, 10,991 (12.0%) patients used more than one progestogen, and the top three combinations were oral dydrogesterone plus progesterone injection (5.6%), oral progesterone plus progesterone injection (4.7%) and oral dydrogesterone plus oral progesterone (1.1%). The prescription rate of dydrogesterone increased gradually, whereas that of progesterone, especially progesterone injection, obviously decreased. Among 34,760 prescriptions of progestogens with complete usage information, the primary errors of progestogen use were "low frequency" (18.4%), "high single dose" (15.9%) and "low single dose" (11.3%). In addition, 137 prescriptions were identified with drug-progestogen interactions, and 61 were identified with contraindications for progestogens. A total of 4.5% of prescriptions included FDA category X medicines. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Our findings are the first to provide information on medication use in patients with threatened miscarriage over the last seven years in China. Medicines targeting the "genitourinary system and sex hormones," especially progestogens, were the most commonly prescribed medications, among which dydrogesterone was the most prevalent. However, it is remarkable that the use of progestogens for the treatment of threatened abortion is still controversial; thus, high-quality large sample studies are still required, especially among Chinese patients. Since usage errors in progestogen records and exposure to category X medicines were common, more efforts are needed to guarantee the safety and rationality of medicines used in pregnant women.


Assuntos
Ameaça de Aborto/prevenção & controle , Progestinas/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Adulto , China , Estudos Transversais , Vias de Administração de Medicamentos , Honorários Farmacêuticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gravidez , Medicamentos sob Prescrição/administração & dosagem , Progestinas/administração & dosagem , Progestinas/economia , Características de Residência/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem
4.
Contraception ; 102(4): 251-253, 2020 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32544400

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To determine progestin-only pill (POP) use at 3 and 6 months postpartum among women who chose POPs at the postpartum visit. STUDY DESIGN: Secondary data analysis of a prospective observational study with telephone interviews at 3 and 6 months postpartum to assess contraceptive use. RESULTS: Of 440 women who attended the postpartum visit, 92 (20.9%) chose POPs. Current POP use was 44/84 (52.4%) at 3 months, 33/76 (43.4%) at 6 months, and 32/76 (42.1%) at both 3- and 6-month follow-up assessments. CONCLUSION: About half of women who plan POP use at the postpartum visit are not using this method at 3 months after delivery. IMPLICATIONS: About half of women with a prescription for progestin-only pills will be not using this method at 3 months postpartum; further understanding of continued sexual activity and breastfeeding may clarify pregnancy risk for those not reporting modern contraception use during the postpartum period.


Assuntos
Anticoncepção/métodos , Anticoncepcionais Orais Hormonais/administração & dosagem , Lactação , Período Pós-Parto , Progestinas/administração & dosagem , Aleitamento Materno , Anticoncepcionais Orais Hormonais/uso terapêutico , Serviços de Planejamento Familiar , Feminino , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Gravidez , Progestinas/uso terapêutico , Estudos Prospectivos
6.
BJOG ; 127(6): 757-767, 2020 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32003141

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To assess the cost-effectiveness of progesterone compared with placebo in preventing pregnancy loss in women with early pregnancy vaginal bleeding. DESIGN: Economic evaluation alongside a large multi-centre randomised placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: Forty-eight UK NHS early pregnancy units. POPULATION: Four thousand one hundred and fifty-three women aged 16-39 years with bleeding in early pregnancy and ultrasound evidence of an intrauterine sac. METHODS: An incremental cost-effectiveness analysis was performed from National Health Service (NHS) and NHS and Personal Social Services perspectives. Subgroup analyses were carried out on women with one or more and three or more previous miscarriages. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cost per additional live birth at ≥34 weeks of gestation. RESULTS: Progesterone intervention led to an effect difference of 0.022 (95% CI -0.004 to 0.050) in the trial. The mean cost per woman in the progesterone group was £76 (95% CI -£559 to £711) more than the mean cost in the placebo group. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for progesterone compared with placebo was £3305 per additional live birth. For women with at least one previous miscarriage, progesterone was more effective than placebo with an effect difference of 0.055 (95% CI 0.014-0.096) and this was associated with a cost saving of £322 (95% CI -£1318 to £673). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that progesterone is associated with a small positive impact and a small additional cost. Both subgroup analyses were more favourable, especially for women who had one or more previous miscarriages. Given available evidence, progesterone is likely to be a cost-effective intervention, particularly for women with previous miscarriage(s). TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Progesterone treatment is likely to be cost-effective in women with early pregnancy bleeding and a history of miscarriage.


Assuntos
Aborto Espontâneo/economia , Aborto Espontâneo/prevenção & controle , Progesterona/economia , Progestinas/economia , Hemorragia Uterina/tratamento farmacológico , Aborto Espontâneo/etiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Análise Custo-Benefício , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Nascido Vivo/economia , Gravidez , Progesterona/uso terapêutico , Progestinas/uso terapêutico , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Medicina Estatal , Resultado do Tratamento , Reino Unido , Hemorragia Uterina/complicações , Hemorragia Uterina/economia , Adulto Jovem
7.
Am J Perinatol ; 36(10): 1066-1071, 2019 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30508869

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the offer, acceptance, uptake, and patient experience with 17-hydroxyprogesterone caproate (17OHP-C) over the course of 10 years. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study with a qualitative component. We identified all women with spontaneous preterm deliveries with subsequent births in our hospital between 2005 and 2015. We used linear regression to calculate unadjusted odds ratios for 17OHP-C offer, acceptance, and doses received associated with predictors of interest, and multivariable modeling further adjusted for potential confounders. A grounded theory approach was used to glean recurrent themes surrounding the patient experience. RESULTS: A total of 265 women fit the eligibility criteria; 39.6% were offered 17OHP-C and 83.8% accepted 17OHP-C. The mean number of documented 17OHP-C doses was 15.7 ± 5.4. Women were less likely to be offered 17OHP-C if they had public insurance or if their earliest preterm birth was of greater gestational age. Non-Hispanic black women were documented to have received four fewer doses than white women. We also identified recurrent themes that hindered acceptance and adherence to 17OHP-C: insurance difficulties, unstable housing, lack of childcare, and job inflexibility. CONCLUSION: Women at a risk of preterm birth are more likely to be offered and receive 17OHP-C if they have private insurance and have had an earlier preterm birth. Non-Hispanic black women were documented to have received fewer doses of 17OHP-C than white women. Further inquiry into the structural causes that lead to disparities in care for women at a risk for preterm birth is important.


Assuntos
Caproato de 17 alfa-Hidroxiprogesterona/uso terapêutico , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Nascimento Prematuro/prevenção & controle , Progestinas/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro , Seguro Saúde , Modelos Lineares , Massachusetts , Gravidez , Grupos Raciais , Estudos Retrospectivos
8.
Menopause ; 25(11): 1187-1190, 2018 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30358711

RESUMO

Discontinuation of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is much more common than what is reported in randomized, double-blind clinical trials. Our purpose in this retrospective study, using a prescription database, was to compare the continuation rate among women who took cyclic combination therapy adding progesterone to estrogen (CYC-PERT) or continuous combined estrogen progestin therapy (CC-PERT). The study subjects were 1,532 women, ≥45 years old, who initially filled index prescriptions for 0.625 mg conjugated estrogens. They were divided into two groups (CYC-PERT = 644, CC-PERT = 888) on the basis of coprescribed medroxyprogesterone. We found that for all women initiating therapy, 35-40% did not return for a refill and 76-81% stopped therapy within 3 years. Those prescribed CC-PERT initially were more likely to stop than those prescribed CYC-PERT (rate ratio [RR] = 1.20; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.06-1.35). Adjustments for age, year of starting medication, cost of medication, and prescriber specialty did not affect the difference in discontinuation between the two regimens (RR 1.18, 95% CI = 1.04-1.34). We conclude that the likelihood of women continuing HRT beyond 3 years of initiation is low. Furthermore, compared with CYC-PERT users, those receiving CC-PERT have a slightly higher probability of discontinuation. Efforts should be made to understand why three quarters of women beginning HRT will stop it long before it can provide major long-term benefit.


Assuntos
Quimioterapia Combinada/métodos , Estrogênios/uso terapêutico , Terapia de Reposição Hormonal/métodos , Pacientes Desistentes do Tratamento , Progesterona/uso terapêutico , Progestinas/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Amenorreia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Estrogênios Conjugados (USP)/economia , Estrogênios Conjugados (USP)/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Seguro de Serviços Farmacêuticos/economia , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Medroxiprogesterona/economia , Medroxiprogesterona/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Osteoporose/prevenção & controle , Pós-Menopausa , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
9.
Theriogenology ; 122: 9-13, 2018 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30199741

RESUMO

Although estrus synchronization considered valuable management tools for improving reproductive performance of ewes, their high expenses and complicated usage prevent sheep farmers to apply these techniques. Therefore, the present study was designed to compare three protocols of estrus synchronization on reproductive performance of Ghezel ewes. For this reason, 27 Ghezel ewes were assigned to three estrus synchronization treatment groups based on a completely randomized design included: progestogen sponge for 12 days + 500 IU eCG at the time of sponge withdrawal (P4eCG group, expensive synchronization), two doses of 75 µg cloprostenol with 12 days interval (CLO group, economical synchronization), and CLO +500 IU eCG at day 12 (CLOeCG group, moderately priced synchronization). Four consecutive blood samples were also collected during the experiment to evaluate progesterone concentrations. The results of the present experiment showed that pregnancy and lambing rates of the first estrus as well as blood progesterone concentration were not affected by the treatments (P > 0.05), though total pregnancy and lambing rates were higher in both P4eCG and CLOeCG groups (P < 0.01). Accordingly, both P4eCG and CLOeCG protocols successfully improved reproductive traits of ewes, though CLOeCG protocol is an advisable technique for sheep farmers through its moderate price, simple application, and high reproductive performance.


Assuntos
Sincronização do Estro/métodos , Estro/efeitos dos fármacos , Ovinos/fisiologia , Animais , Cruzamento/economia , Cruzamento/métodos , Gonadotropina Coriônica/administração & dosagem , Gonadotropina Coriônica/uso terapêutico , Cloprostenol/administração & dosagem , Cloprostenol/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Gravidez , Taxa de Gravidez , Progestinas/administração & dosagem , Progestinas/uso terapêutico
10.
J Med Econ ; 21(9): 853-860, 2018 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29770717

RESUMO

AIMS: Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) is a highly prevalent condition, characterized by excessive menstrual blood loss and cramping, that interferes with activities of daily life. The aim of this study was to investigate treatment patterns in HMB in Japan, and to assess healthcare resource utilization and costs among women newly-diagnosed with the condition. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed health insurance data available in the Japan Medical Data Center (JMDC) database on women aged 18-49 years who were newly-diagnosed with primary or secondary HMB. Treatment patterns were analyzed, and healthcare utilization and costs were evaluated and compared to matched controls. RESULTS: The study included a total of 635 patients, 210 with primary HMB and 425 with secondary HMB. In the primary HMB cohort, 60.0% of patients received one or more pharmacological or surgical treatments, compared with 76.2% in the secondary HMB cohort. The most commonly prescribed medications in all patients were hemostatic agents (28.7%), traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) (12.1%), and low-dose estrogen progestins (LEPs) (10.1%). After adjustment for patient baseline characteristics, healthcare costs were 1.93-times higher in primary HMB cases (p < .0001) and 4.44-times higher in secondary HMB cases (p < .0001) vs healthy controls. Outpatient care was the main cost driver. LIMITATIONS: The main limitations of this study are related to its retrospective nature, and the fact that only reimbursed medications were captured in the source database. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial proportion of HMB patients did not receive the recommended treatments. Healthcare costs were considerably increased in the presence of an HMB diagnosis.


Assuntos
Recursos em Saúde/economia , Recursos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Menorragia/economia , Menorragia/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Estrogênios/economia , Estrogênios/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Hemostáticos/economia , Hemostáticos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Japão , Medicina Tradicional Chinesa/economia , Medicina Tradicional Chinesa/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Econométricos , Progestinas/economia , Progestinas/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto Jovem
11.
Ann Emerg Med ; 72(2): 194-203.e1, 2018 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29503044

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Hereditary angioedema is a rare disease associated with unpredictable, recurrent attacks of potentially life-threatening edema. Management of severe attacks is currently suboptimal because emergency medical teams are often unaware of new specific treatments. The objective of this trial is to test whether a dedicated national telephone care-management strategy would reduce resource use during severe hereditary angioedema attacks. METHODS: We conducted a cluster-randomized multicenter prospective trial of patients with a documented diagnosis of hereditary angioedema (type I, II or FXII hereditary angioedema). Participants were enrolled between March 2013 and June 2014 at 8 participating reference centers. The randomized units were the reference centers (clusters). Patients in the intervention arm were given a national free telephone number to call in the event of a severe attack. Emergency physicians in the SOS-hereditary angiœdema (SOS-HAE) call center were trained to advise or prescribe specific treatments. The primary outcome was number of admissions for angioedema attacks. Economic evaluation was also performed. RESULTS: We included 100 patients in the SOS-HAE group and 100 in the control group. During the 2 years, there were 2,368 hereditary angioedema attacks among 169 patients (85%). Mean number of hospital admissions per patient in the 2-year period was significantly greater in the usual-practice group (mean 0.16 [range 0 to 2] versus 0.03 [range 0 to 1]); patient risk difference was significant: -0.13 (95% confidence interval -0.22 to -0.04; P=.02). Probabilistic sensitivity graphic analysis indicated a trend toward increased quality-adjusted life-years in the SOS-HAE group. CONCLUSION: A national dedicated call center for management of severe hereditary angioedema attacks is associated with a decrease in hospital admissions and may be cost-effective if facilities and staff are available to deliver the intervention alongside existing services.


Assuntos
Angioedemas Hereditários/tratamento farmacológico , Angioedemas Hereditários/epidemiologia , Admissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Androgênios/uso terapêutico , Call Centers , Competência Clínica , Análise por Conglomerados , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Progestinas/uso terapêutico , Estudos Prospectivos , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Ácido Tranexâmico/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento
13.
Curr Osteoporos Rep ; 15(5): 459-472, 2017 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28831686

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The review aims to summarize our current knowledge surrounding treatment strategies aimed at recovery of bone mass in energy-deficient women suffering from the Female Athlete Triad. RECENT FINDINGS: The independent and interactive contributions of energy status versus estrogen status on bone density, geometry, and strength have recently been reported, highlighting the importance of addressing both energy and estrogen in treatment strategies for bone health. This is supported by reports that have identified energy-related features (low body weight and BMI) and estrogen-related features (late age of menarche, oligo/amenorrhea) to be significant risk factors for low bone mineral density and bone stress injury in female athletes and exercising women. Nutritional therapy is the recommended first line of treatment to recover bone mass in energy-deficient female athletes and exercising women. If nutritional therapy fails after 12 months or if fractures or significant worsening in BMD occurs, pharmacological therapy may be considered in the form of transdermal estradiol with cyclic oral progestin (not COC).


Assuntos
Densidade Óssea , Ingestão de Energia , Exercício Físico , Síndrome da Tríade da Mulher Atleta/dietoterapia , Desnutrição/dietoterapia , Terapia Nutricional/métodos , Osteoporose/dietoterapia , Administração Cutânea , Administração Oral , Amenorreia , Doenças Ósseas Metabólicas/dietoterapia , Doenças Ósseas Metabólicas/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças Ósseas Metabólicas/etiologia , Metabolismo Energético , Estradiol/uso terapêutico , Estrogênios/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Síndrome da Tríade da Mulher Atleta/complicações , Síndrome da Tríade da Mulher Atleta/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Desnutrição/complicações , Osteoporose/tratamento farmacológico , Osteoporose/etiologia , Fraturas por Osteoporose/prevenção & controle , Progestinas/uso terapêutico , Magreza
14.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 217(6): 669.e1-669.e13, 2017 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28844824

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Uterine-preserving therapy with progesterone may be used in young women with endometrial cancer who desire fertility preservation. Such therapy delays definitive treatment with hysterectomy. OBJECTIVE: We examined the use and safety of progestational therapy in young women with endometrial cancer. The primary outcome of the analysis was overall survival. STUDY DESIGN: We identified women ≤49 years of age with stage I endometrial cancer in the National Cancer Database from 2004 through 2014. Women treated with hormonal therapy with or without hysterectomy were compared to women treated with hysterectomy. After propensity score weighting, overall survival was examined using proportional hazards models. RESULTS: A total of 23,231 patients, including 872 (3.8%) women treated with hormonal therapy were identified. Use of hormonal therapy was 2.4% (95% confidence interval, 1.8-3.3%) in 2004 and increased over time to 5.9% (95% confidence interval, 5.0-6.9%) by 2014 (P < .0001). Use of hormonal therapy decreased with older age, higher substage, and increasing grade. Black women were more likely to receive hormonal therapy while Medicaid recipients were less likely to receive hormonal therapy. The 5-year survival for patients treated with hormonal therapy was 96.4% (95% confidence interval, 94.3-98.0%) compared to 97.2% (95% confidence interval, 96.9-97.4%) for hysterectomy. In a multivariable model, women treated with hormonal therapy were 92% (hazard ratio, 1.92; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-3.19) more likely to die compared to women who underwent primary hysterectomy. When stratified by stage, hormonal therapy was associated with increased mortality in women with stage IB and I-not otherwise specified tumors but not for stage IA neoplasms. CONCLUSION: Use of progestational therapy is increasing. Its use was associated with decreased survival, particularly in women with stage IB tumors.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Endometrioide/tratamento farmacológico , Causas de Morte , Neoplasias do Endométrio/tratamento farmacológico , Progesterona/uso terapêutico , Progestinas/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Carcinoma Endometrioide/patologia , Bases de Dados Factuais , Neoplasias do Endométrio/patologia , Feminino , Preservação da Fertilidade , Hispânico ou Latino , Humanos , Histerectomia , Seguro Saúde , Modelos Lineares , Medicaid , Medicare , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Tratamentos com Preservação do Órgão , Pontuação de Propensão , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estados Unidos , Útero , População Branca
16.
Obstet Gynecol ; 129(2): 337-346, 2017 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28079774

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To promote use of progestogen therapy to reduce premature births in Ohio by 10%. METHODS: The Ohio Perinatal Quality Collaborative initiated a quality improvement project in 2014 working with clinics at 20 large maternity hospitals, Ohio Medicaid, Medicaid insurers, and service agencies to use quality improvement methods to identify eligible women and remove treatment barriers. The number of women eligible for prophylaxis, the percent prescribed a progestogen before 20 and 24 weeks of gestation, and barriers encountered were reported monthly. Clinics were asked to adopt protocols to identify candidates and initiate treatment promptly. System-level changes were made to expand Medicaid eligibility, maintain Medicaid coverage during pregnancy, improve communication, and adopt uniform data collection and efficient treatment protocols. Rates of singleton births before 32 and 37 weeks of gestation in Ohio hospitals were primary outcomes. We used statistical process control methods to analyze change and generalized linear mixed models to estimate program effects accounting for known risk factors. RESULTS: Participating sites tracked 2,562 women eligible for treatment between January 1, 2014, and November 30, 2015. Late entry to care, variable interpretation of treatment guidelines, maintenance of Medicaid coverage, and inefficient communication among health care providers and insurers were identified as treatment barriers. Births before 32 weeks of gestation decreased in all hospitals by 6.6% and in participating hospitals by 8.0%. Births before 32 weeks of gestation to women with prior preterm birth decreased by 20.5% in all hospitals, by 20.3% in African American women, and by 17.1% in women on Medicaid. Births before 37 weeks of gestation were minimally affected. Adjusting for risk factors and birth clustering by hospital confirmed a program-associated 13% (95% confidence interval 0.3-24%) reduction in births before 32 weeks of gestation to women with prior preterm birth. CONCLUSION: The Ohio progestogen project was associated with a sustained reduction in singleton births before 32 weeks of gestation in Ohio.


Assuntos
Promoção da Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Maternidades/estatística & dados numéricos , Nascimento Prematuro/prevenção & controle , Progestinas/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Idade Gestacional , Promoção da Saúde/métodos , Humanos , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Ohio/epidemiologia , Gravidez , Nascimento Prematuro/epidemiologia , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Estados Unidos
17.
FP Essent ; 449: 27-36, 2016 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27731969

RESUMO

Transgender and gender-nonconforming individuals experience significant health disparities. They are more likely to use drugs and alcohol, smoke, be diagnosed with HIV infection or other sexually transmitted infections, and experience depression or attempt suicide. Many also experience discrimination within the health care system. Office-level strategies to create a safe and affirming space for gender-expansive patients include posting of a nondiscrimination statement, use of intake forms that ask about current gender identity and birth-assigned sex, provision of gender-neutral restrooms, and staff training in use of appropriate language. Hormone or surgical therapy can be initiated for patients with persistent gender dysphoria who are of age and have the capacity to make informed decisions, and have reasonable control of coexisting medical and psychiatric conditions. Estrogens, antiandrogens, and progestins are used for feminization, and testosterone for masculinization. Hormone treatment should be followed by careful monitoring for potential adverse effects. Surgical options include male-to-female and female-to-male procedures. The family physician may need to provide a referral letter, preoperative and postoperative examinations and care, and advocacy with health insurance providers. Preventive care for transgender patients includes counseling for cardiovascular health, cancer screening, provision of appropriate contraception, and screening for sexually transmitted infections.


Assuntos
Assistência à Saúde Culturalmente Competente , Medicina de Família e Comunidade , Disforia de Gênero/diagnóstico , Pessoas Transgênero , Antagonistas de Androgênios/uso terapêutico , Anticoncepção , Transtorno Depressivo/psicologia , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Estrogênios/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Disforia de Gênero/psicologia , Disforia de Gênero/terapia , Infecções por HIV/diagnóstico , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Medicina Preventiva , Progestinas/uso terapêutico , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Cirurgia de Readequação Sexual/métodos , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/diagnóstico , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/tratamento farmacológico , Tentativa de Suicídio , Testosterona/uso terapêutico
18.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can ; 38(3): 279-300, 2016 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27106200

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To provide guidelines for health care providers on the use of contraceptive methods to prevent pregnancy and on the promotion of healthy sexuality. OUTCOMES: Overall efficacy of cited contraceptive methods, assessing reduction in pregnancy rate, safety, ease of use, and side effects; the effect of cited contraceptive methods on sexual health and general well-being; and the relative cost and availability of cited contraceptive methods in Canada. EVIDENCE: Published literature was retrieved through searches of Medline and The Cochrane Database from January 1994 to January 2015 using appropriate controlled vocabulary (e.g., contraception, sexuality, sexual health) and key words (e.g., contraception, family planning, hormonal contraception, emergency contraception). Results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized control trials/controlled clinical trials, and observational studies published in English from January 1994 to January 2015. Searches were updated on a regular basis in incorporated in the guideline to June 2015. Grey (unpublished) literature was identified through searching the websites of health technology assessment and health technology-related agencies, clinical practice guideline collections, clinical trial registries, and national and international medical specialty societies. VALUES: The quality of the evidence in this document was rated using the criteria described in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (Table 1). CHAPTER 8: PROGESTIN-ONLY CONTRACEPTION: Summary Statements Recommendations.


Assuntos
Anticoncepção , Progestinas , Serviços de Saúde Reprodutiva , Canadá , Consenso , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Progestinas/administração & dosagem , Progestinas/uso terapêutico
20.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 29(11): 1861-5, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26169704

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess if women with recurrent preterm birth had been offered, received, and adhered to progesterone supplementation guidelines and to ascertain reasons for failure to follow guidelines. METHODS: Charts of infants who were products of recurrent spontaneous preterm birth were reviewed at four neonatal intensive care units of Akron Children's Hospital. Mothers of identified infants were interviewed and charts abstracted to determine: if progesterone was offered; acceptance of progesterone; compliance with progesterone; and reasons why progesterone was declined. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-eight mothers with a recurrent spontaneous preterm birth were identified and 98 consented to participate. 62.2% (61/98) of the interviewed mothers reported that they were offered progesterone. Of the women offered progesterone, 82% (50/61) accepted treatment and 18.0% (11/61) declined. One woman who accepted progesterone did not receive it. Of the women who received progesterone, 18.4% (9/49) reported compliance failure. Of the women who did not receive progesterone, 75.5% (37/49) reported that they were not offered progesterone and 89.2% (33/37) of the women not offered progesterone reported that their care providers were aware of their prior preterm delivery. CONCLUSIONS: Only 50% (49/98) of women who were candidates for progesterone received treatment. The main reason for women not receiving treatment was not being offered progesterone by their caregiver.


Assuntos
Aborto Habitual/prevenção & controle , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Progesterona/uso terapêutico , Progestinas/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Estudos Prospectivos , Melhoria de Qualidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA