A Genetic Assessment of Dopamine Agonist-Induced Impulse Control Disorder in Patients With Prolactinoma.

CONTEXT: Dopamine agonist (DA)-induced impulse control disorder (ICD) represents a group of behavioral disorders that are increasingly recognized in patients with prolactinoma. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to examine the genetic component of the underlying mechanism of DA-induced ICD. METHODS: Patients with prolactinoma receiving dopamine agonist (cabergoline) treatment were included in the study. These patients were divided into 2 groups: patients who developed ICD due to DA and patients who did not. Patients were evaluated for polymorphisms of the DRD1, DRD3, COMT, DDC, GRIN2B, TPH2, OPRK1, OPRM1, SLC6A4, SLC6A3, HTR2A genes. RESULTS: Of the 72 patients with prolactinoma using cabergoline, 20 were diagnosed with ICD. When patients with and without ICD were compared according to genotype frequencies, OPRK1/rs702764, DRD3/rs6280, HTR2A/rs6313, SLC6A4/rs7224199, GRIN2B/rs7301328, TPH2/rs7305115, COMT/rs4680, DRD1/rs4532 polymorphisms significantly increased in patients with DA-induced ICD. CONCLUSION: Our results show that multiple neurotransmission systems affect DA-induced ICD in patients with prolactinoma.

An Economic Analysis of Bromocriptine Versus Trans-Sphenoidal Surgery for the Treatment of Prolactinoma.

Prolactinomas account for ∼40% of all pituitary adenomas and are important causes of infertility and gonadal dysfunction. In general, most prolactinomas are treated medically with dopaminergic agonists, while surgery is reserved for patients intolerant or nonresponsive to these medications. The aim of this study was to carry out a comparative analysis of the cost-effectiveness of medical therapy with bromocriptine and surgical therapy with trans-sphenoidal surgery. A Markov model was developed based on retrospective data from 126 patients with prolactinoma treated in our hospital between October 2008 and May 2009, and from data published previously. For patients with microadenoma, the cost of medical treatment was estimated to be ¥20,555, while the cost of surgery was calculated to be ¥22,527. For patients with macroadenoma, the cost of therapy with bromocriptine was ¥31,461 in males and ¥27,178 in females, while the cost of surgery was ¥42,357 in males and ¥44,094 in females. Sensitivity analyses (carried our using variations in patient age, bromocriptine therapeutic dose, bromocriptine maintenance dose, and the success rate of bromocriptine withdrawal) indicated that our model showed good stability, although our results were most heavily influenced by variations in the bromocriptine maintenance dose. It is concluded that, from an economic viewpoint, medical therapy with bromocriptine should be the first-line treatment option for patients with prolactinoma, irrespective of whether this is a microadenoma or macroadenoma.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Microscopic and Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Surgery Versus Medical Therapy in the Management of Microprolactinoma in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Although prolactinomas are treated effectively with dopamine agonists, some have proposed curative surgical resection for select cases of microprolactinomas to avoid life-long medical therapy. We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing transsphenoidal surgery (either microsurgical or endoscopic) and medical therapy (either bromocriptine or cabergoline) with decision analysis modeling. METHODS: A 2-armed decision tree was created with TreeAge Pro Suite 2012 to compare upfront transsphenoidal surgery versus medical therapy. The economic perspective was that of the health care third-party payer. On the basis of a literature review, we assigned plausible distributions for costs and utilities to each potential outcome, taking into account medical and surgical costs and complications. Base-case analysis, sensitivity analysis, and Monte Carlo simulations were performed to determine the cost-effectiveness of each strategy at 5-year and 10-year time horizons. RESULTS: In the base-case scenario, microscopic transsphenoidal surgery was the most cost-effective option at 5 years from the time of diagnosis; however, by the 10-year time horizon, endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery became the most cost-effective option. At both time horizons, medical therapy (both bromocriptine and cabergoline) were found to be more costly and less effective than transsphenoidal surgery (i.e., the medical arm was dominated by the surgical arm in this model). Two-way sensitivity analysis demonstrated that endoscopic resection would be the most cost-effective strategy if the cure rate from endoscopic surgery was greater than 90% and the complication rate was less than 1%. Monte Carlo simulation was performed for endoscopic surgery versus microscopic surgery at both time horizons. This analysis produced an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $80,235 per quality-adjusted life years at 5 years and $40,737 per quality-adjusted life years at 10 years, implying that with increasing time intervals, endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery is the more cost-effective treatment strategy. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of the results of our model, transsphenoidal surgical resection of microprolactinomas, either microsurgical or endoscopic, appears to be more cost-effective than life-long medical therapy in young patients with life expectancy greater than 10 years. We caution that surgical resection for microprolactinomas be performed only in select cases by experienced pituitary surgeons at high-volume centers with high biochemical cure rates and low complication rates.

Surgical treatment of prolactinomas: cons.

Prolactinomas account for approximately 40 % of all pituitary adenomas. Over 95 % of prolactinomas are microadenomas (< 10 mm diameter). Treatment is indicated to correct hypogonadism, restore other hormonal deficits, and alleviate local mass effects. Dopamine agonists (DA) are highly effective in achieving these goals and are well-tolerated. The vast majority of prolactinomas will respond to conventional doses of cabergoline (≤2 mg/week) that do not carry an increased risk of cardiac valvular abnormalities. DA therapy may be successful withdrawn in a subset of patients and thus is not necessarily a lifelong commitment. Although transsphenoidal surgery (TSS) is an option for prolactinoma treatment, it is less effective than medical management, carries considerably more risk, and is more expensive. The benefit/risk ratio for DA therapy compared to TSS actually becomes increasingly more favorable as tumor size increases. Therefore DA should remain the clear treatment of choice for essentially all patients with prolactinomas, reserving TSS as a second-line option for the very small number of patients that do not tolerate or are completely resistant to DA therapy.

[Cost-effectiveness analysis of two therapeutic methods for prolactinoma].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the therapeutic responses to transsphenoidal surgery and medical therapy in terms of normalization of prolactin (PRL), mortality, morbidity and the cost-effectiveness of PRL normalization in order to establish an individualized therapeutic protocol for the patients with prolactinoma. METHODS: A retrospective study was undertaken of a consecutive series of patients with prolactinoma who were followed for at least 1 year after transsphenoidal surgery or medical treatment. The clinical characteristics and the long-term outcomes (normalization of PRL, morbidity or mortality) were assessed. Utilizing the principle of medical economics and data from the two types of treatment, we worked out a Markov chain and calculated the lowest cost of two kinds of therapeutic protocols. RESULTS: (1) The success rate of normalizing serum PRL through surgical treatment in microadenoma was 85% (22/26), and that of medical treatment was 95% (19/20). There was no statistical difference between the two therapies (P > 0.05). The success rate of normalizing serum PRL through surgical treatment in macroadenoma was 45% (19/42), and that of medical treatment was 5/5. There was a statistical difference between the two therapies (P < 0.05). (2) According to the Markov model, it would cost a microprolactinoma patient 25,129.25 yuan to normalize serum PRL by surgical treatment. This is comparable to the cost of medical treatment which would be 24,943.99 yuan. Whereas for a macroprolactinoma patient surgery would cost 35,208.20 yuan and medical treatment would cost 25,344.38 yuan. CONCLUSIONS: Medical therapy is superior to surgical treatment in regard to complication rate and cost-effectiveness for macro- and extra big prolactinomas. Transsphenoidal surgery remains an option for patients with microadenomas. Markov model is an effective way to predict the treatment cost for patients with hyperprolactinoma at different ages and with different causes.

The assessment of cabergoline efficacy and tolerability in patients with pituitary prolactinoma type.

Prolactinoma is the most frequent type of secreting pituitary tumours. In the treatment, pharmacotherapy with dopamine agonists is considered the first-line option. For many years bromocriptine, a D1 and D2 dopamine receptor agonist, has been the standard medicine for hyperprolactinemic patients. However, the treatment is frequently associated with intolerance or resistance. Recently cabergoline, a long acting, ergoline-derived, selective D2 agonist has become available and has been promoted as the initial treatment. Therefore the object of four studies was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of cabergoline in patients with prolactin-secreting pituitary adenomas. 17 patients, 13 women at the age of 21-55 years (average 37.1) and 4 men at the age of 29-45 years (average 36.3), with pathological hyperprolactinemia due to pituitary tumours were involved in the study. In all patients the increased pretreatment concentration of PRL was observed, ranging from 1047 to 1678 mlU/ml (mean 1369 mlU/ml). MRI scans revealed microprolactinomas in 11 (64.7%) cases and macroadenomas in 6 (35.3%) cases. None of the patients had previously undergone pituitary surgery and all of them were newly diagnosed, previously untreated. The patients were treated with cabergoline for 6 months. Cabergoline therapy was started at a dose of 0.5 mg twice a week for the first two months, then the dose was decreased to a 0.25 mg twice a week and finally maintained at 0.25 mg a week. After 6 months of the therapy, the normalization of serum PRL concentrations (from mean 1358 mlU/ml to mean 420 mlU/ml; p < 0.001) was achieved in 13 (76.5%) patients (8 with microprolactinoma and 5 with macroprolactinoma). In the remaining 4 patients PRL levels remained elevated but were decreased from mean 1403 mIU/ml to mean 812 mIU/ml. There were no differences, regarding CAB efficacy in lowering PRL levels, between patients with micro- and macroadenomas (p > 0.05). About 90% women resumed menstrual cycles in our study. All the other clinical pretreatment symptoms disappear in the course of the therapy. The tumour shrinkage, confirmed by control MRI was noted in 2 patients (33%) with macroprolactinoma. Cabergoline was tolerated satisfactorily by all our patients. The results have confirmed a high efficacy and a very good tolerability of CAB in the treatment of patients with pituitary adenomas. Together with a very convenient administration, such therapy can provide a very good patient compliance thus should be considered the first line option in patients with prolactinomas.

Abnormal LH pulsatility in women with hyperprolactinaemic amenorrhoea normalizes after bromocriptine treatment: deconvolution-based assessment.

OBJECTIVE: The present study examines the LH secretory process in hyperprolactinaemic women before, during and after bromocriptine therapy, using restrictive clinical selection criteria as well as improved methodological tools. PATIENTS AND DESIGN: Six women (aged 20-40 years) with microprolactinomas (mean +/- SE prolactin, PRL: 2478 +/- 427 mU/l, range: 1370-3800 mU/l) and four age- and sex-matched healthy controls were admitted to the study. After an overnight fast, all patients and controls had blood samples withdrawn at 10 minute intervals for 6 h (during saline infusion) from 0800 h to 1400 h to determine serum LH and PRL concentrations. After baseline evaluation, patients were treated with bromocriptine, which was started at a daily dose of 1.25 mg for 7 days; the dose was then increased to 2.5 mg daily for the next 7 days and subsequently to 2.5 mg twice daily. PRL levels were evaluated at weekly intervals after the beginning of bromocriptine therapy for the duration of the study. The 6 h pulsatility study was repeated on four patients during treatment at a time when PRL levels were decreased, although not normalized (PRL range: 450-1350 mU/l) and, on four patients, with the attainment of normal serum PRL levels (PRL < 450 mU/l) in the early follicular phase of the menstrual cycle (days 2-5). The LH instantaneous secretion rate was reconstructed by a nonparametric deconvolution method. In addition to pulse analysis made using the program DETECT, the evaluation of the secretion rate yielded the pulse frequency as well as the pulse amplitude distribution. RESULTS: Each time series was submitted to deconvolution analysis using a nonparametric method in order to estimate the instantaneous secretion rate (ISR). Hyperprolactinaemic patients had very few high-amplitude LH pulses above 0.2 IU/(l minutes) before treatment (average frequency: 0.83 +/- 0.40 pulses/6 h) and at the intermediate evaluation (0.25 +/- 0.25 pulses/6 h). In both cases, the pulse frequency was significantly lower than in controls (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively). When PRL was normalized, the number of high-amplitude LH pulses (4.25 +/- 1.03 pulses/6 h), became statistically different from the pulse number before (P < 0.01) and during (P < 0.01) therapy; in particular the pulse frequency after therapy rose to a level not statistically different from that in controls. CONCLUSION: The present study shows the presence of reduced LH pulsatility in hyperprolactinaemic women that recovers completely to within the physiological distribution when PRL levels are normalized by bromocriptine therapy.