Single-dose pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics assessment of oestriol and trimegestone containing vaginal rings in healthy women with childbearing potential.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oestriol (E3) and trimegestone (TMG) in healthy women after application of three different vaginal rings over 21 days. The vaginal rings had a nominal delivery rate of 0.413/0.050 mg/day (Test 1), 0.311/0.090 mg/day (Test 2) and 0.209/0.137 mg/day (Test 3) E3/TMG. METHODS: Thirty-five healthy women were randomised to receive a single application of Test 1, 2 or 3 (Clinical Trial NCT03343912). The E3 and TMG plasma concentration was determined by LC-MS/MS. Oestradiol (E2) and progesterone (PG) serum concentrations, and bleeding patern were determined as pharmacodynamic parameters. Safety was assessed by evaluation of adverse events and local tolerability. RESULTS: The total and maximum exposure of E3 and TMG increased in a proportional ratio to dose. However, not in a magnitude which was expected from the dose differences for E3. During Test 2 and 3 treatment all E2 and PG values remained on a well suppressed level until end of treatment. E2 and PG serum levels increased distinctly earlier after ring removal with Test 1 compared to Test 2 and 3. Test 3 achieved 95.24% of "no bleeding" days under treatment followed by Test 1 (91.67%), and Test 2 (86.15%). CONCLUSIONS: The Test 3 formulation presented the best dose combination of E3/TMG for contraception. Moreover, all vaginal rings were well tolerated.

Parallel assessment of the impact of different hormone replacement therapies on breast density by radiologist- and computer-based analyses of mammograms.

OBJECTIVES: First, to compare the impact of nasally and orally dosed estradiol on breast density; second, to investigate the utility of computer-based automated approaches to the assessment of breast density with reference to traditional methods. METHODS: Digitized images from two 2-year, randomized, placebo-controlled trials formed the basis of the present post hoc analysis. Active treatments were 1 mg estradiol continuously combined with 0.125 mg trimegestone (oral hormone replacement therapy, HRT) or low-dose (150 or 300 microg estradiol) nasal estradiol cyclically combined with 200 mg micronized progesterone (nasal HRT). The effects on breast density were assessed by a radiologist, providing the BI-RADS score and the interactive threshold, and by a computer-based approach, providing the measure of stripiness and the HRT-effect specific measure of breast density. RESULTS: In the oral HRT trial, active treatment induced a significant increase in breast density, which was consistent in all methods used (all p < 0.05). In contrast, none of the methods detected significant changes in women receiving nasal HRT. The sensitivity of automated methods to discriminate HRT- from placebo-treated women was equal or better than the sensitivity of methods performed by the radiologist. CONCLUSIONS: The markedly different pharmacokinetic profile of nasal estrogen seems to be associated with better breast safety. Automated computer-based analysis of digitized mammograms provides a sensitive measure of changes in breast density induced by hormones and could serve as a useful tool in future clinical trials.

Assessment of the metabolic tolerance in postmenopausal women over a 1-year period of two hormone replacement therapies containing estradiol in combination with either norgestrel or trimegestone.

This double-blind, randomized, multi-center study compared the metabolic tolerance of a combined formulation containing estradiol (E2) and trimegestone (TMG) with a standard hormone replacement therapy (HRT) containing estradiol valerate (EV) and norgestrel (NG). Blood lipids, glucose and fibrinogen concentrations were measured in the study which was conducted over 13 cycles, each of 28 days, and included 634 subjects in two randomized groups. A total of 481 subjects completed the study. The circulating concentrations of high density lipoprotein (HDL), HDL2, HDL3 cholesterol and apolipoprotein A1 were increased in the E2 + TMG group and reduced in the EV + NG group. Total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, apolipoprotein B and lipoprotein(a) concentrations were decreased in both treatment groups; however, the reduction in LDL cholesterol was greater in the E2 + TMG group. Similar lipid findings were found in a subgroup that excluded subjects who had less than 3 months washout from a previous HRT, who provided a blood sample outside the day 17-28 window, or who were taking beta-blockers or thiazide diuretics. Blood glucose concentrations were reduced slightly in both treatment groups. A significant reduction in fibrinogen was also seen in both groups over the course of the study. The changes in lipid profile, especially HDL cholesterol, were more beneficial in the E2 + TMG group in comparison with the EV + NG group. This reflects the lack of androgenic action of trimegestone in comparison with norgestrel, which exhibits an androgenic effect and prevents the estrogen-induced increase in HDL cholesterol. The results of the study suggest that the use of trimegestone in combination with E2 may be preferable to norgestrel because of the more favorable lipid profile.