Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
ACS Chem Neurosci ; 9(2): 358-368, 2018 02 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29035509

RESUMO

Intranasal drug delivery is a noninvasive drug delivery route that can enhance systemic delivery of therapeutics with poor oral bioavailability by exploiting the rich microvasculature within the nasal cavity. The intranasal delivery route has also been targeted as a method for improved brain uptake of neurotherapeutics, with a goal of harnessing putative, direct nose-to-brain pathways. Studies in rodents, nonhuman primates, and humans have pointed to the efficacy of intranasally delivered neurotherapeutics, while radiolabeling studies have analyzed brain uptake following intranasal administration. In the present study, we employed carbon-11 radioactive methylation to assess the pharmacokinetic mechanism of intranasal delivery of Orexin A, a native neuropeptide and prospective antinarcoleptic drug that binds the orexin receptor 1. Using physicochemical and pharmacological analysis, we identified the methylation sites and confirmed the structure and function of methylated Orexin A (CH3-Orexin A) prior to monitoring its brain uptake following intranasal administration in rodent and nonhuman primate. Through positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of [11C]CH3-Orexin A, we determined that the brain exposure to Orexin A is poor after intranasal administration. Additional ex vivo analysis of brain uptake using [125I]Orexin A indicated intranasal administration of Orexin A affords similar brain uptake when compared to intravenous administration across most brain regions, with possible increased brain uptake localized to the olfactory bulbs.


Assuntos
Encéfalo/efeitos dos fármacos , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagem , Radioisótopos de Carbono , Orexinas/administração & dosagem , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons , Promotores da Vigília/administração & dosagem , Administração Intranasal , Animais , Encéfalo/metabolismo , Macaca mulatta , Masculino , Metilação , Estrutura Molecular , Orexinas/síntese química , Orexinas/química , Orexinas/farmacocinética , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons/métodos , Racloprida/administração & dosagem , Racloprida/farmacocinética , Ratos Sprague-Dawley , Promotores da Vigília/síntese química , Promotores da Vigília/química , Promotores da Vigília/farmacocinética
2.
Am J Manag Care ; 20(3): e90-7, 2014 Mar 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24773330

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: A "chiral switch" occurs in the pharmaceutical market when a drug made up of 2 enantiomer forms is replaced with a purified single-enantiomer version, often in the context of a patent expiration. We studied the prevalence of chiral switching in the United States over the past decade, including trends in use of, and expenditures on, these products in Medicaid. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. METHODS: We used US Adopted Names prefixes (lev/levo/ar/es/dex/dextro) to identify all single-enantiomer drugs approved from 2001 to 2011. From publicly available US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval documents, we extracted the characteristics of the pivotal premarket trials for the single enantiomers. Specifically, we evaluated whether the single enantiomer was directly compared with the precursor racemic drug and whether there was evidence of superior efficacy. We used quarterly drug expenditure data from each state Medicaid program to chart trends in use of, and spending on, the single-enantiomer products and their racemic precursors during the study period. RESULTS: From 2001 to 2011, the FDA approved 9 single-enantiomer products: dexlansoprazole, levoleucovorin, levocetirizine, armodafinil, arformoterol, eszopiclone, escitalopram, dexmethylphenidate, and esomeprazole. Of those 9 drugs, 3 had at least 1 pre-approval randomized trial that included the racemic precursor as a direct comparator, but there was no evidence of superiority of the single enantiomer over the racemic at comparable doses. Between 2001 and 2011, US Medicaid programs spent approximately $6.3 billion on these 9 single-enantiomer drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Recently approved single-enantiomer drugs showed no evidence of superior efficacy over the older racemic precursors in the pivotal trials leading to their approval, and in a majority of cases, they were not directly compared.


Assuntos
Aprovação de Drogas , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicaid/economia , Antídotos/química , Antídotos/economia , Compostos Azabicíclicos/química , Compostos Azabicíclicos/economia , Compostos Benzidrílicos/química , Compostos Benzidrílicos/economia , Broncodilatadores/química , Broncodilatadores/economia , Estimulantes do Sistema Nervoso Central/química , Estimulantes do Sistema Nervoso Central/economia , Cetirizina/química , Cetirizina/economia , Dexlansoprazol/química , Dexlansoprazol/economia , Cloridrato de Dexmetilfenidato/química , Cloridrato de Dexmetilfenidato/economia , Medicamentos Genéricos/economia , Esomeprazol/química , Esomeprazol/economia , Zopiclona , Etanolaminas/química , Etanolaminas/economia , Fumarato de Formoterol , Antagonistas não Sedativos dos Receptores H1 da Histamina/química , Antagonistas não Sedativos dos Receptores H1 da Histamina/economia , Humanos , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/química , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/economia , Levoleucovorina/química , Levoleucovorina/economia , Modafinila , Patentes como Assunto , Piperazinas/química , Piperazinas/economia , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/química , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estereoisomerismo , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration , Promotores da Vigília/química , Promotores da Vigília/economia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA