Ex Ante Economic Evaluation of Arg389 Genetically Targeted Treatment with Bucindolol versus Empirical Treatment with Carvedilol in NYHA III/IV Heart Failure.

OBJECTIVE: The Beta-Blocker Evaluation Survival Trial showed no survival benefit for bucindolol in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III/IV heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction, but subanalyses suggested survival benefits for non-Black subjects and Arg389 homozygotes. We conducted an ex ante economic evaluation of Arg389 targeted treatment with bucindolol versus carvidolol, complementing a previous ex ante economic evaluation of bucindolol preceded by genetic testing for the Arg389 polymorphism, in which genetic testing prevailed economically over no testing. METHODS: A decision tree analysis with an 18-month time horizon was performed to estimate the cost effectiveness/cost utility of trajectories of 100%, 50%, and 0% of patients genetically tested for Arg389 and comparing bucindolol with empirical carvedilol treatment as per prior BEST subanalyses. Incremental cost-effectiveness/cost-utility ratios (ICERs/ICURs) were estimated. RESULTS: Race-based analyses for non-White subjects at 100% testing showed a loss of (0.04) life-years and (0.03) quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) at an incremental cost of $2185, yielding a negative ICER of ($54,625)/life-year and ICUR of ($72,833)/QALY lost; at 50%, the analyses showed a loss of (0.27) life-years and (0.16) QALYs at an incremental cost of $1843, yielding a negative ICER of ($6826)/life-year and ICUR of ($11,519)/QALY lost; at 0%, the analyses showed a loss of (0.33) life-years and (0.30) QALYs at an incremental cost of $1459, yielding a negative ICER of ($4421)/life-year and ICUR of ($4863)/QALY lost. Arg389 homozygote analyses at 100% testing showed incremental gains of 0.02 life-years and 0.02 QALYs at an incremental cost of $378, yielding an ICER of 18,900/life-year and ICUR of $18,900/QALY gained; at 50%, the analyses showed a loss of (0.24) life-years and (0.09) QALYs at an incremental cost of $1039, yielding a negative ICER of ($4329)/life-year and ICUR of ($9336)/QALY lost; at 0%, the analyses showed a loss of (0.33) life-years and (0.30) QALYs at an incremental cost of $1459, yielding a negative ICER of ($4421)/life-year and ICUR of ($4863)/QALY lost. CONCLUSION: This independent ex ante economic evaluation suggests that genetically targeted treatment with bucindolol is unlikely to yield clinicoeconomic benefits over empirical treatment with carvedilol in NYHA III/IV HF.

In vitro anticancer activity of Betulinic acid and derivatives thereof on equine melanoma cell lines from grey horses and in vivo safety assessment of the compound NVX-207 in two horses.

Betulinic acid, a pentacyclic triterpene, and its derivatives are promising compounds for cancer treatment in humans. Melanoma is not only a problem for humans but also for grey horses as they have a high potential of developing melanoma lesions coupled to the mutation causing their phenotype. Current chemotherapeutic treatment carries the risk of adverse health effects for the horse owner or the treating veterinarian by exposure to antineoplastic compounds. Most treatments have low prospects for systemic tumor regression. Thus, a new therapy is needed. In this in vitro study, Betulinic acid and its two derivatives B10 and NVX-207, both with an improved water solubility compared to Betulinic acid, were tested on two equine melanoma cell lines (MelDuWi and MellJess/HoMelZh) and human melanoma (A375) cell line. We could demonstrate that all three compounds especially NVX-207 show high cytotoxicity on both equine melanoma cell lines. The treatment with these compounds lead to externalization of phosphatidylserines on the cell membrane (AnnexinV-staining), DNA-fragmentation (cell cycle analysis) and activation of initiator and effector caspases (Caspase assays). Our results indicate that the apoptosis is induced in the equine melanoma cells by all three compounds. Furthermore, we succeed in encapsulating the most active compound NVX-207 in 2-Hydroxyprolyl-ß-cyclodextrine without a loss of its activity. This formulation can be used as a promising antitumor agent for treating grey horse melanoma. In a first tolerability evaluation in vivo the formulation was administered every one week for 19 consecutive weeks and well tolerated in two adult melanoma affected horses.

Pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction assessment between LCZ696, an angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor, and hydrochlorothiazide, amlodipine, or carvedilol.

LCZ696 is a first-in-class angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor in development for treatments of hypertension and heart failure indications. In 3 separate studies, pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions (DDIs) potential was assessed when LCZ696 was coadministered with hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ), amlodipine, or carvedilol. The studies used a open-label, single-sequence, 3-period, crossover design in healthy subjects. Blood samples were collected to determine the pharmacokinetic parameters of LCZ696 analytes (AHU377, LBQ657, and valsartan), HCTZ, amlodipine, or carvedilol (R[+]- and S[-]-carvedilol) for statistical analysis. When coadministered LCZ696 with HCTZ, the 90% CIs of the geometric mean ratios of AUCtau,ss of HCTZ and that of LBQ657 were within a 0.80-1.25 interval, whereas HCTZ Cmax,ss decreased by 26%, LBQ657 Cmax,ss increased by 19%, and the AUCtau,ss and Cmax,ss of valsartan increased by 14% and 16%, respectively. Pharmacokinetics of amlodipine, R(+)- and S(-)-carvedilol, or LBQ657 were not altered after coadministration of LCZ696 with amlodipine or carvedilol. Coadministration of LCZ696 400 mg once daily (qd) with HCTZ 25 mg qd, amlodipine 10 mg qd, or carvedilol 25 mg twice a day (bid) had no clinically relevant pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions. LCZ696, HCTZ, amlodipine, and carvedilol were safe and well tolerated when given alone or concomitantly in the investigated studies.

Clinical status and outcome of Japanese heart failure patients with reduced or preserved ejection fraction treated with carvedilol.

The effect of beta-blockers in treating Japanese heart failure (HF) patients with preserved left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) is unclear. This prospective observational study enrolled 1,682 Japanese HF patients who received carvedilol for the first time. Patients were followed for a mean of 1.6 years. The 1,492 patients with baseline LVEF measurements were allocated to the following groups: reduced EF (LVEF < 40%; n = 724), borderline EF (LVEF 4050%; n = 355), and preserved EF (LVEF ≥ 50%; n = 413). Baseline characteristics, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, change in B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) level, and long-term outcome were compared among the groups. Patients with preserved EF were more likely to be older, female, and have ischemic etiology and hypertension than patients with reduced EF. Carvedilol maintenance dosage was lower in patients with preserved EF (7.9 mg/day versus 6.6 mg/ day). NYHA class and BNP level were lower in patients with preserved EF at baseline but improved to the same level in all groups at 6 months. After adjusting for baseline characteristics, the hazard ratio for death or hospitalization due to cardiovascular disease in patients with preserved EF versus those with reduced EF was 1.031 (P = 0.847). This study elucidated the characteristics of HF patients given carvedilol in "real world" clinical settings. A comparative controlled study is necessary to elucidate whether the improvements in NYHA and BNP as well as the outcome profile observed in patients with preserved EF were caused by the favorable effects of carvedilol.

Self-rated health predicts adverse events during ß-blocker treatment: the CIBIS-ELD randomised trial analysis.

BACKGROUND: Self-rated health (SRH) predicts outcome in patients with heart failure. Beta-blockers are known to improve health-related quality of life and reduce mortality in such patients. We aimed to evaluate the relation between SRH and adverse events during titration of beta-blockers in elderly patients with heart failure. METHODS: The cardiac insufficiency bisoprolol study in the elderly (CIBIS-ELD) is a multicentre, double-blind trial, in which 883 patients aged ≥ 65 years with chronic heart failure (73 ± 6 years, 38% women, left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] 42% ± 14%) were randomised to bisoprolol or carvedilol. SRH was assessed at baseline and after 12 weeks, using a 5-grade descriptive scale: excellent, very good, good, fair, and poor. RESULTS: Median SRH at baseline and follow-up was good, but more patients reported fair/poor SRH at baseline (36% vs. 30%, p = 0.012). Women, beta-blocker-naïve patients, patients in NYHA class III/IV and those with PHQ-9 score ≥ 12 were more likely to report fair/poor baseline SRH (p < 0.001 for all). During follow-up, SRH improved in 34% of patients and worsened in 8% (p < 0.001). Adverse events were experienced by 64% patients and 38% experienced > 1 adverse event or serious adverse event, with higher prevalence in lower SRH categories. In a multivariate logistic regression model, SRH, age, distance achieved on the 6-min walk test and LVEF >45% predicted adverse events (p < 0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: SRH is an independent predictor of adverse events during titration of beta-blockers and correlates with the proportion and number of adverse events per patient.

An assessment of the association between carvedilol exposure and severe hypersensitivity reactions, angioedema, and anaphylactic reactions: a retrospective nested case-control analysis.

BACKGROUND: There is limited information in the literature regarding the risk of severe hypersensitivity reactions due to different ß-blocking agents. Most of the available information addresses the potential for increased severity of anaphylaxis or poor response to treatments among patients receiving ß-blocking agents. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to estimate the incidence rates of severe hypersensitivity reactions (angioedema and anaphylactic reactions) for various ß-blockers and to examine the risk of severe hypersensitivity reactions in patients exposed to carvedilol extended-release compared with carvedilol and compared with other ß-blockers. METHODS: A case-control analysis nested within a cohort of ß-blocker users in the LabRx Database was conducted. A case was defined as an incident hypersensitivity reaction of either anaphylactic shock (International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision [ICD-9] code 995.0) or angioneurotic edema (ICD-9 code 995.1). Three controls were matched to each case. Patients were classified according to their ß-blocker exposure in the 30 day-period before the index date. Conditional logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios and 95% CIs. RESULTS: A total of 1,810,487 ß-blocker users were identified; 7811 hypersensitivity cases and 23,433 controls were included in this analysis. The mean (SD) age of the cohort was 53 (14) years, and 49% were men. The overall incidence rates of severe hypersensitivity reactions among various ß-blockers categories were similar to that in the overall ß-blocker users cohort (2.40 per 1000 person-years [95% CI, 2.35-2.45]). The odds ratios of severe hypersensitivity reaction for carvedilol extended-release compared with carvedilol and with other long-acting ß-blockers were 0.86 (95% CI, 0.48-1.53) and 1.10 (95% CI, 0.90-1.35), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective database analysis of mostly middle-aged patients detected no statistically significant differences in the likelihood of severe hypersensitivity reactions among patients who received carvedilol extended-release versus carvedilol or other long-acting ß-blockers.

Persistence with nebivolol in the treatment of hypertension: a retrospective claims analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Examine drug persistence by evaluating the hazard of discontinuation and of switching to different antihypertensive drugs in patients initiating treatment with a recently approved ß-blocker, nebivolol, versus other ß-blockers. METHODS: This retrospective analysis included all patients diagnosed with hypertension in the MarketScan Database (January 2007 - December 2008) with at least two medical claims and no prior ß-blocker prescriptions within 6 months of the initial prescription date. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard models (adjusted for baseline differences in demographics, previous use of other antihypertensive medications, initial doses and supply of medication, and number of distinct prescriptions at baseline) were used to assess the hazard of discontinuation, defined as the first prescription gap of ≥30 days, and to assess the hazard of switching to another antihypertensive drug, defined as a prescription fill for another antihypertensive drug within 15 days before and 30 days after discontinuation of the initial ß-blocker. RESULTS: Of the 173,200 patients included in the study population, the adjusted hazard of discontinuation for nebivolol-initiated patients was 8-20% lower than that of patients who initiated treatment with atenolol (hazard ratio [HR] 0.82, p < 0.001), metoprolol (HR 0.91, p < 0.001), carvedilol (HR 0.92, p < 0.001), or other ß-blockers (HR 0.80, p < 0.001). The adjusted hazard of nebivolol-treated patients switching to a different antihypertensive medication was 12-22% lower than that of the other four ß-blocker cohorts (atenolol: HR 0.80, p < 0.001; metoprolol: HR 0.86, p < 0.001; carvedilol: HR 0.88, p < 0.001; other ß-blockers: HR 0.78, p < 0.001). Sensitivity analyses defined discontinuation as prescription gaps of ≥45 days and ≥60 days and showed a lower hazard of discontinuation among patients initiating nebivolol than among patients initiating all other drug cohorts (p < 0.001). LIMITATIONS: Comparisons of non-randomized treatment groups may be confounded by unobserved differences in patients' baseline characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Initiation with nebivolol was associated with greater persistence than initiation with atenolol, carvedilol, metoprolol, or other ß-blockers.

Use and risk management of carvedilol for the treatment of heart failure in the community in England: results from a modified prescription-event monitoring study.

BACKGROUND: In the UK, the licence for carvedilol was extended in 1998 to include symptomatic heart failure (New York Heart Association [NYHA] class II and III heart failure) with the recommendation that initiation and up-titration should be under the supervision of a hospital physician. A post-marketing surveillance study was conducted to address the UK regulatory authority's request for monitoring the use and safety of carvedilol prescribed for heart failure in clinical practice. AIM: To investigate adherence to risk management recommendations for the use of carvedilol for heart failure, monitor how patients' subsequent care was managed and collect event data to evaluate the safety profile of carvedilol used for the treatment of heart failure. METHODS: An observational cohort study using a modified prescription-event monitoring technique identified patients from dispensed primary care prescriptions in England (August 1999 to June 2001). An eligibility questionnaire was used to identify patients who had been prescribed carvedilol for heart failure for the first time after 31 July 1999. Up to three follow-up questionnaires were sent to the prescribers of eligible patients, requesting demographic information, dosage, supervision of treatment, status of cardiac failure and event information. RESULTS: 2311 patients met the eligibility criteria. For 1666 patients, one or more valid follow-up questionnaires were returned: 68.5% were male; male median age 66 years; female median age 72 years; the observation period was up to 3 years. Hospital physicians supervised initiation of treatment and first up-titration in 85.6% and 61.4% of patients, respectively. 49.2% of patients were prescribed the recommended starting dosage of carvedilol (6.25 mg/day). Approximately 25% of patients started on a lower dose than recommended, and the same proportion were prescribed a higher dose. NYHA status of cardiac failure between starting treatment and the third questionnaire improved for 39.5% of patients, deteriorated for 10.9%, and 11.7% of those for whom NYHA status was given died. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were reported for 2.4% of patients; the most commonly reported ADR was malaise/lassitude. Overall, 27.1% of patients stopped taking carvedilol. None of the 163 deaths were attributed to carvedilol. CONCLUSIONS: Regulatory guidelines for the use and risk management of carvedilol in heart failure were mostly followed, and most patients appeared to benefit from treatment with carvedilol for heart failure. Malaise/lassitude was the main reason for discontinuing treatment. Further investigations may be warranted to examine the prescribing of carvedilol at lower than recommended doses.

The impact of baseline HR and BP on the tolerability of carvedilol in the elderly: the COLA (Carvedilol Open Label Assessment) II Study.

BACKGROUND: The COLA (Carvedilol Open Label Assessment) II Study prospectively evaluated the tolerability of carvedilol in 1030 patients >70 years of age with chronic heart failure (CHF). Tolerability, defined as patients receiving > or =3 months of carvedilol and achieving a maintenance dosage > or =12.5 mg/day, was 80%. In a multivariate analysis, advanced age, low DBP, left ventricular ejection fraction, obstructive airways disease, and a presence of diabetes mellitus were predictors of tolerability. The aim of this analysis was to evaluate further the relationship between baseline HR, SBP, DBP and tolerability in COLA II. METHODS: Baseline HR, SBP and DBP data were available in 1009 patients (98%). These data were analyzed as both continuous and categorical variables. For the latter analysis, the following categories were created: HR <70, 70 < or = HR <90, HR > or =90 bpm; SBP <120, 120 < or = SBP <160, SBP > or =160 mm Hg; DBP <70, 70 < or = DBP <90, DBP > or =90 mm Hg. RESULTS: Baseline HR did not differ between patients who tolerated carvedilol (T) and those who did not (non-T) [81 +/- 16 vs 79 +/- 16 bpm]. However, SBP and DBP were significantly lower in the non-T versus the T group (131 +/- 20 vs 139 +/- 22 mm Hg for SBP [p < 0.001] and 77 +/- 11 vs 81 +/- 12 mm Hg for DBP [p < 0.001]). Seventy-four percent of patients in the lowest category for baseline HR (<70 bpm tolerated carvedilol versus 82% and 79% of those in the higher categories (p = not significant). Seventy percent of patients in the lowest category of baseline SBP (<120 mm Hg) tolerated carvedilol versus 80% and 89% of those in the upper categories (p < 0.001). Similarly, 73% of patients in the lowest category for DBP (<70 mm Hg) tolerated carvedilol versus 78% and 87% of those in the upper categories (p < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Carvedilol is generally well tolerated by elderly patients with CHF, even in those with low baseline BP or HR. However, a low baseline SBP or DBP does identify patients who are less likely to tolerate the drug. Baseline HR does not appear to significantly affect tolerability in this population.

Assessment of systemic adverse reactions induced by ophthalmic beta-adrenergic receptor antagonists.

To assess quantitatively the risks of ophthalmic beta-blocking agents for cardiovascular and respiratory adverse reactions, we analyzed the binding kinetics of beta-blocking agents to the beta-1 and beta-2 adrenoceptors. The relationship between the occupancies for beta-1 and beta-2 adrenoceptors and the effects on the exercise pulse rate or the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) after topical administration of carteolol, befunolol, timolol and betaxolol was analyzed using a ternary complex model. The beta-1 and beta-2 receptor occupancies after ophthalmic administration were calculated to be quite high as well as those after oral administration. The maximum occupancies for beta-1 and beta-2 receptors after ordinary ophthalmic administration were 52% and 88% for carteolol, 52% and 61% for befunolol, 62% and 82% for timolol, and 44% and 3% for betaxolol, respectively. Concave relationships were obtained between a decrease in exercise pulse rate and the beta-1 receptor occupancy and between a decrease in FEV1 and beta-2 receptor occupancy, respectively. Nasolacrimal occlusion was estimated to decrease the exercise pulse rate and FEV1 by 65% and 50%, respectively. The beta-1 and beta-2 adrenoceptor occupancies were proved to be the most appropriate indicators for cardiac and pulmonary adverse reactions evoked by ophthalmic beta-blocking agents.

A risk-benefit assessment of carvedilol in the treatment of cardiovascular disorders.

Carvedilol is a nonselective beta-adrenoceptor blocking vasodilator drug that may be a promising new agent in the management of cardiovascular disease. The rationale for the development of agents of this type is that the alpha-blocking component may overcome the direct vasoconstrictor consequence of beta 2-blockade, whilst the beta-blocker component may inhibit the reflex tachycardia that occurs following alpha-blockade. In clinical trials published to date, carvedilol has been demonstrated to be effective as an antihypertensive agent as monotherapy and also as additional therapy in those patients whose blood pressure cannot be controlled on other standard agents. It is also effective in the management of angina. Carvedilol has beneficial haemodynamic effects in patients with congestive heart failure. beta-Blocker vasodilator drugs of this type may be particularly useful in this condition as the vasodilator component of the drug may overcome the initial negative inotropy of the beta-blocker. In addition, carvedilol possess potentially useful pharmacological actions. In particular, the drug has antimitogenic and free radical scavenging effects that may make it a useful therapy in the long term management of atherosclerotic vascular disease. Its metabolic profile is also favourable, presumably on the basis of its alpha-blocking properties. Thus, beta 2-mediated adverse effects on peripheral vascular tone, glycaemic control and lipid status appear to be offset by the alpha-blocking property of the drug. Carvedilol thus far appears to be well tolerated, with postural dizziness the major adverse effect, especially in the elderly. As with nonselective beta-blockers, carvedilol is contraindicated in patients with asthma.

Assessment of bronchial effects following topical administration of butylamino-phenoxy-propanol-acetate, an oculoselective beta-adrenoceptor blocker in asthmatic subjects.

1. Butylamino-phenoxy-propanol-acetate (BPPA) is a new topical oculoselective beta-adrenoceptor blocker for the reduction of intraocular pressure (IOP) in man. Its potency on the airways of normal subjects was identical with that of placebo. A study was carried out to determine the potential of BPPA to cause bronchoconstriction in mild asthmatics (FEV1 greater than or equal to 60% predicted) with normal IOP. 2. Twelve nonsmoking outpatients who bronchoconstricted to 0.25 or 0.50% of timolol eye drops (fall in FEV1 23.33 +/- 1.20% (mean +/- s.e. mean), range 16-30) were investigated in this double-masked, randomized, 3-period, crossover study. On three different occasions six incremental concentrations of BPPA (range: 0.1-2%; maximum cumulative concentration 4%), timolol (0.1-1%; 2%), and placebo were administered bilaterally until bronchoconstriction (decrease in FEV1 greater than or equal to 20% and in specific airway conductance (sGaw) greater than or equal to 35% simultaneously) or the maximum cumulative concentration was reached. 3. Airway response was measured as change in FEV1 and sGaw and dose-response curves to timolol, BPPA and placebo were performed. IOP was measured 3 h after the highest concentration of each study day. 4. Timolol caused dose-dependent falls in FEV1 and sGaw as well as clinical symptoms of respiratory distress in all subjects. The median cumulative concentrations of timolol required to decrease FEV1 by 20% and sGaw by 35% were 0.98% and 1.53%. Neither placebo (P greater than 0.05) nor BPPA (P greater than 0.05) caused a significant change in sGaw. A fall in FEV1 by 20% not accompanied by a simultaneous fall in sGaw by 35% was found in four subjects following BPPA and in five subjects following placebo.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)