Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 13 de 13
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Transl Sci ; 14(1): 143-147, 2021 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32860737

RESUMO

Cenerimod is a sphingosine-1-phosphate 1 receptor (S1P1 R) modulator in phase II development for treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus. Its pharmacokinetics (PKs), pharmacodynamics (PDs), as well as safety and tolerability were investigated in white and Asian subjects to allow for recruitment of Asian patients in future studies. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel-group study was performed in 20 healthy male subjects (n = 10 per ethnicity). A single, oral dose of 4 mg cenerimod or placebo (ratio 8:2) was administered under fasted conditions. The PKs of cenerimod were similar in white and Asian subjects indicated by geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval) of 0.99 (0.80-1.21) for maximum plasma concentration, 0.96 (0.75-1.24) for area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to infinity, and 1.04 (0.86-1.25) for terminal half-life. Accordingly, the extent and time course of reduction in lymphocyte count (as PD biomarker) were also similar in white and Asian subjects as compared with placebo. As observed for other S1PR modulators, a transient mean (SD) heart rate reduction in white (15.1 (14.8) bpm) and Asian (11.8 (6.16) bpm) subjects was observed following administration of cenerimod. The drug was safe and well-tolerated indicated by occurrence of a single adverse event of chemical conjunctivitis in a white subject that was not suspected as study drug related. In conclusion, the determined absence of any relevant PK or PD differences supports using the same doses of cenerimod in white and Asian patients in upcoming late-phase studies.


Assuntos
Oxidiazóis/farmacocinética , Propilenoglicóis/farmacocinética , Receptores de Esfingosina-1-Fosfato/metabolismo , Administração Oral , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Área Sob a Curva , Asiático , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Método Duplo-Cego , Meia-Vida , Voluntários Saudáveis , Frequência Cardíaca/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/tratamento farmacológico , Contagem de Linfócitos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Oxidiazóis/administração & dosagem , Oxidiazóis/efeitos adversos , Seleção de Pacientes , Propilenoglicóis/administração & dosagem , Propilenoglicóis/efeitos adversos , População Branca , Adulto Jovem
2.
Int J Pharm ; 569: 118624, 2019 Oct 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31419461

RESUMO

Nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC) and nanoemulsions (NE) are colloid carriers which could improve dermal delivery of tacrolimus. The aims of this study were to evaluate effects of different formulation and process parameters on physicochemical characteristics and stability of lecithin-based NLC with glyceryl palmitostearate as solid and propylene glycol monocaprylate as liquid lipid and to compare the influence of different inner structure of tacrolimus-loaded NLC and corresponding NE on physicochemical characteristics, stability, entrapment efficiency, in vitro drug release and overall skin performance. Solid/liquid lipid ratio, total amount of lipids, homogenization pressure and cooling after the preparation were identified as critical variables in NLC development. Moreover, tacrolimus-loaded NLC emerged as more stabile carrier than NE. Differential stripping performed on porcine ear skin revealed significantly higher tacrolimus amount in stratum corneum from nanocarriers compared to referent ointment (Protopic®). Similarly the highest amount of tacrolimus in hair follicles was obtained using NLC (268.54 ±â€¯92.38 ng/cm2), followed by NE (128.17 ±â€¯48.87 ng/cm2) and Protopic® (77.61 ±â€¯43.25 ng/cm2). Contrary, the highest permeation rate through full-thickness porcine ear skin was observed for Protopic®, implying that the selection of experimental setup is critical for reliable skin performance assessment. Overall, developed NLC could be suggested as promising carrier in a form of lotion for tacrolimus dermal delivery.


Assuntos
Portadores de Fármacos/administração & dosagem , Imunossupressores/administração & dosagem , Lecitinas/administração & dosagem , Nanoestruturas/administração & dosagem , Tacrolimo/administração & dosagem , Administração Cutânea , Animais , Caprilatos/administração & dosagem , Caprilatos/química , Portadores de Fármacos/química , Composição de Medicamentos , Liberação Controlada de Fármacos , Emulsões , Imunossupressores/química , Lecitinas/química , Lipídeos/administração & dosagem , Lipídeos/química , Nanoestruturas/química , Pomadas , Propilenoglicóis/administração & dosagem , Propilenoglicóis/química , Pele/metabolismo , Absorção Cutânea , Suínos , Tacrolimo/química
3.
Int J Toxicol ; 37(1_suppl): 5S-18S, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29761730

RESUMO

The Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR) Expert Panel (Panel) reviewed the safety of tromethamine, aminomethyl propanediol, and aminoethyl propanediolas used in cosmetics. All 3 ingredients are reported to function in cosmetics as pH adjusters, and tromethamine and aminomethyl propanediol are also reported to function as fragrance ingredients. The Panel reviewed relevant animal and human data related to these ingredients, along with a previous safety assessment of aminomethyl propanediol. The Panel concluded that tromethamine, aminomethyl propanediol, and aminoethyl propanediol are safe in cosmetics in the practices of use and concentration as given in this safety assessment.


Assuntos
Cosméticos/efeitos adversos , Cosméticos/química , Propilenoglicóis/efeitos adversos , Trometamina/efeitos adversos , Animais , Linhagem Celular , Sobrevivência Celular/efeitos dos fármacos , Qualidade de Produtos para o Consumidor , Humanos , Estrutura Molecular , Propilenoglicóis/administração & dosagem , Propilenoglicóis/química , Propilenoglicóis/farmacocinética , Ratos , Trometamina/administração & dosagem , Trometamina/química , Trometamina/farmacocinética
4.
Curr Med Res Opin ; 29(12): 1647-56, 2013 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24059944

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Disease-modifying therapies, such as fingolimod, interferon (IFN) and glatiramer acetate (GA), have differing effects on relapse rates in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), but little is known about the real-world differences in relapse rates with these treatments. This retrospective study assessed relapse rates in patients with active MS initiating fingolimod, IFN or GA therapy in a real-world setting. METHODS: Using administrative claims data from the US PharMetrics Plus database, we identified previously treated and untreated patients with MS who initiated fingolimod, IFN or GA treatment between 1 October 2010 and 31 March 2011 and had experienced a relapse in the previous year. A claims-based algorithm was used to identify relapses over the persistence period in patients with 540 days of post-index continuous enrolment. A logistic regression model assessed the probability of having at least one relapse and a generalized linear model estimated differences in annualized relapse rates (ARRs). RESULTS: The study enrolled 525 patients (fingolimod, n = 128; combined IFN/GA cohort, n = 397) of the 31,041 initially identified. Similar findings for fingolimod and IFN/GA were observed for the unadjusted proportion of patients experiencing relapses (31.3% vs. 34.0%, respectively; p = 0.5653) and ARRs (0.50 vs. 0.55, respectively) while persistent to treatment. After adjusting for baseline differences, fingolimod was associated with a 52% reduction in the probability of having a relapse (odds ratio, 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28-0.84; p = 0.0097) and a 50% reduction in ARR (rate ratio, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.34-0.75; p = 0.0006) compared with IFN/GA. LIMITATIONS: Identification of relapses is based on the claims in the database rather than on a clinical assessment. CONCLUSIONS: In a real-world setting, fingolimod was shown to be associated with significantly lower relapse rates than IFN/GA in patients with MS who had a history of relapses.


Assuntos
Bases de Dados Factuais , Imunossupressores/administração & dosagem , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros , Interferons/administração & dosagem , Esclerose Múltipla/tratamento farmacológico , Peptídeos/administração & dosagem , Propilenoglicóis/administração & dosagem , Esfingosina/análogos & derivados , Adulto , Feminino , Cloridrato de Fingolimode , Acetato de Glatiramer , Humanos , Técnicas In Vitro , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Esclerose Múltipla/epidemiologia , Recidiva , Estudos Retrospectivos , Esfingosina/administração & dosagem , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
5.
Int J Toxicol ; 31(5 Suppl): 245S-60S, 2012.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23064775

RESUMO

Propylene glycol is an aliphatic alcohol that functions as a skin conditioning agent, viscosity decreasing agent, solvent, and fragrance ingredient in cosmetics. Tripropylene glycol functions as a humectant, antioxidant, and emulsion stabilizer. Polypropylene glycols (PPGs), including PPG-3, PPG-7, PPG-9, PPG-12, PPG-13, PPG-15, PPG-16, PPG-17, PPG-20, PPG-26, PPG-30, PPG-33, PPG-34, PPG-51, PPG-52, and PPG-69, function primarily as skin conditioning agents, with some solvent use. The majority of the safety and toxicity information presented is for propylene glycol (PG). Propylene glycol is generally nontoxic and is noncarcinogenic. Clinical studies demonstrated an absence of dermal sensitization at use concentrations, although concerns about irritation remained. The CIR Expert Panel determined that the available information support the safety of tripropylene glycol as well as all the PPGs. The Expert Panel concluded that PG, tripropylene glycol, and PPGs ≥3 are safe as used in cosmetic formulations when formulated to be nonirritating.


Assuntos
Qualidade de Produtos para o Consumidor , Cosméticos/química , Fármacos Dermatológicos/toxicidade , Polímeros/toxicidade , Propilenoglicol/toxicidade , Propilenoglicóis/toxicidade , Administração Cutânea , Animais , Antioxidantes/administração & dosagem , Antioxidantes/química , Antioxidantes/farmacocinética , Antioxidantes/toxicidade , Cosméticos/toxicidade , Fármacos Dermatológicos/administração & dosagem , Fármacos Dermatológicos/química , Fármacos Dermatológicos/farmacocinética , Humanos , Polímeros/administração & dosagem , Polímeros/química , Polímeros/farmacocinética , Propilenoglicol/administração & dosagem , Propilenoglicol/química , Propilenoglicol/farmacocinética , Propilenoglicóis/administração & dosagem , Propilenoglicóis/química , Propilenoglicóis/farmacocinética , Higiene da Pele/efeitos adversos , Testes de Toxicidade , Viscosidade
6.
Clin Ther ; 34(7): 1583-90, 2012 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22749258

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Fingolimod is a once-daily orally administered disease-modifying therapy (DMT) indicated for treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS) to reduce the frequency of clinical relapses and delay accumulation of physical disability. In the randomized, double-blind, phase 3 TRANSFORMS trial, 0.5 mg/d oral fingolimod substantially reduced relapse frequency when compared with IM interferon-ß1a (IFN-ß1a) at 12-months. In a 12-month, double-blind, extension phase of the TRANSFORMS study, patients assigned to receive fingolimod continued to receive the same dosage, whereas patients who originally received IM IFN-ß1a were randomized to receive either 0.5 or 1.25 mg/d fingolimod. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the cost-effectiveness of initiating fingolimod therapy early versus after 1 year of IFN-ß1a therapy using TRANSFORMS study extension data. METHODS: A Microsoft Excel-based model was used to calculate the cost per relapse avoided for 2 years with continuous treatment with fingolimod compared with first-year treatment with IM IFN-ß1a and second-year treatment with fingolimod. One-way sensitivity analyses were conducted on key input variables to assess their effect on cost per relapse avoided. RESULTS: The 2-year relapse rate in the early fingolimod arm was 0.23, and in the delayed fingolimod arm was 0.53. The cost per relapse avoided was $83,125 in the early fingolimod arm versus $103,624 in the delayed fingolimod arm. Results of the sensitivity analyses showed an effect of drug acquisition cost and number of relapses in patients who received no treatment. CONCLUSION: Continuous treatment with fingolimod for 2 years resulted in a lower cost per relapse avoided compared with treatment with IM IFN-ß1a for the first year and then switching to fingolimod therapy. Thus, delaying fingolimod therapy does not seem to be cost effective.


Assuntos
Imunossupressores/administração & dosagem , Interferon beta/uso terapêutico , Esclerose Múltipla Recidivante-Remitente/tratamento farmacológico , Propilenoglicóis/administração & dosagem , Esfingosina/análogos & derivados , Adjuvantes Imunológicos/economia , Adjuvantes Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Análise Custo-Benefício , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Método Duplo-Cego , Cloridrato de Fingolimode , Humanos , Imunossupressores/economia , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Injeções Intramusculares , Interferon beta-1a , Interferon beta/economia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Esclerose Múltipla Recidivante-Remitente/economia , Propilenoglicóis/economia , Propilenoglicóis/uso terapêutico , Esfingosina/administração & dosagem , Esfingosina/economia , Esfingosina/uso terapêutico , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
8.
11.
Int J Toxicol ; 28(6 Suppl): 162S-74S, 2009.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19966148

RESUMO

PPG-2 methyl ether, PPG-3 methyl ether, and PPG-2 methyl ether acetate are used in cosmetics as fragrance ingredients and/or solvents at concentrations of 0.4% to 2%. Propylene glycol ethers are rapidly absorbed and distributed throughout the body when introduced by inhalation or oral exposure, but the inhalation toxicity of PPG-2 methyl ether vapor, for example, is low. Aerosols, such as found with hair sprays, produce particle sizes that are not respirable. Because these ingredients are highly water-soluble, they are likely to be absorbed through the human skin only at slow rates, resulting in low blood concentrations and rapid removal by the kidney. These ingredients are not genotoxic and are not reproductive or developmental toxicants. Overall the data are sufficient to conclude that PPG-2 methyl ether, PPG-3 methyl ether, and PPG-2 methyl ether acetate are safe as used in cosmetics.


Assuntos
Qualidade de Produtos para o Consumidor , Cosméticos/química , Emolientes/toxicidade , Propilenoglicóis/toxicidade , Solventes/toxicidade , Administração Cutânea , Administração por Inalação , Administração Oral , Animais , Cosméticos/toxicidade , Emolientes/administração & dosagem , Emolientes/farmacocinética , Humanos , Dose Letal Mediana , Masculino , Odorantes , Propilenoglicóis/administração & dosagem , Propilenoglicóis/farmacocinética , Solventes/administração & dosagem , Solventes/farmacocinética , Testes de Toxicidade
12.
Int J Toxicol ; 28(6 Suppl): 141S-61S, 2009.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19966147

RESUMO

Aminomethyl propanol and aminomethyl propanediol are substituted aliphatic alcohols that function as pH adjusters in cosmetic products at concentrations less than 10%; additionally, aminomethyl propanediol is a fragrance. Extensive oral toxicity data are reviewed, with fewer inhalation toxicity data. Dermal toxicity data are presented that demonstrate, for example, that a mascara with 1.92% aminomethyl propanediol does not cause dermal irritation or allergic contact sensitization, suggesting that the maximum reported use concentration of 2% in mascara would be safe. Although these ingredients are primary amines that are not substrates for N-nitrosation, they may contain secondary amines as impurities in finished products that may undergo N-nitrosation. These ingredients should not be included in cosmetic formulations containing N-nitrosating agents. The Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel concludes that aminomethyl propanol and aminomethyl propanediol are safe as cosmetic ingredients in the practices of use and concentrations as described in this safety assessment.


Assuntos
Qualidade de Produtos para o Consumidor , Cosméticos/química , Emulsificantes/toxicidade , Propanolaminas/toxicidade , Propilenoglicóis/toxicidade , Administração Cutânea , Administração por Inalação , Administração Oral , Animais , Soluções Tampão , Cosméticos/toxicidade , Emulsificantes/administração & dosagem , Emulsificantes/farmacocinética , Humanos , Hipersensibilidade/etiologia , Dose Letal Mediana , Odorantes , Propanolaminas/administração & dosagem , Propanolaminas/farmacocinética , Propilenoglicóis/administração & dosagem , Propilenoglicóis/farmacocinética , Testes de Toxicidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA