The Hidden Burden of Disease and Treatment Experiences of Patients with Essential Tremor: A Retrospective Claims Data Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Essential tremor (ET) affects approximately 7 million people in the USA, yet public recognition of the disease and its impact remain low. METHODS: A retrospective observational study examined US claims data from 2015 to 2019 using the Compile database. ET diagnoses were captured using longitudinal data from 2015 to 2019 and for the year 2019, with diagnosis estimates extrapolated to the general US population. Confirmed ET was identified by an ET diagnosis code with at least two relevant prescriptions or by two diagnosis codes for ET and unspecified tremor at least 90 days apart. Comorbidity and treatment use data were extracted, and medication compliance and 2-year treatment persistence were assessed as measures of treatment adherence. RESULTS: A total of 1,336,183 patients with ET diagnoses codes were identified from 2015 through 2019, corresponding to 2,226,971 projected US diagnoses. In 2019, 128,263 patients had a confirmed ET diagnosis, corresponding to 213,772 projected US confirmed diagnoses. Of these, 96% had at least one comorbidity, and 64% received at least one pharmacologic treatment. Propranolol (24%) and primidone (20%) comprised the most common ET prescriptions. Two-year medication discontinuation rates were approximately 40%. CONCLUSION: Our findings revealed that 1 million people were diagnosed and sought treatment for ET in the USA from 2015 to 2019. Projected population estimates of approximately 2 million people diagnosed suggest a further 1 million remain untreated. Our findings highlight the complexity of patient care in ET, complicated by delayed diagnoses, multiple comorbidities, and lack of effective and tolerable therapies that can mitigate treatment adherence limitations.

Acute effect of propranolol on resting energy expenditure in hyperthyroid patients.

Objective: Hyperthyroidism is a common endocrine disorder which leads to higher resting energy expenditure (REE). Increased activity of brown adipose tissue (BAT) contributes to elevated REE in hyperthyroid patients. For rapid control of hyperthyroid symptoms, the non-selective ß-blocker propranolol is widely used. While, long-term treatment with propranolol reduces REE it is currently unclear whether it can also acutely diminish REE. Design: In the present prospective interventional trial we investigated the effect of propranolol on REE in hyperthyroid patients. Methods: Nineteen patients with overt primary hyperthyroidism were recruited from the endocrine outpatient clinic. REE was measured by indirect calorimetry before and after an acute dose of 80mg propranolol and during a control period, respectively. Additionally, skin temperature was recorded at eleven predefined locations during each study visit, vital signes and heart rate (HR) were measured before and after administration of propranolol. Results: Mean REE decreased slightly after acute administration of 80mg propranolol (p= 0.03) from 1639 ± 307 kcal/24h to 1594 ± 283 kcal/24h. During the control visit REE did not change significantly. HR correlated significantly with the level of free T3 (R2 = 0.38, p=0.029) free T4 (R2 = 0.39, p=0.026). HR decreased 81 ± 12 bpm to 67 ± 7.6 bpm 90 minutes after oral administration of propranolol (p<0.0001). Skin temperature did not change after propranolol intake. Conclusions: In hyperthyroid patients a single dose of propranolol reduced heart rate substantially but REE diminished only marginally probably due to reduced myocardial energy consumption. Our data speak against a relevant contribution of BAT to the higher REE in hyperthyroidism. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier (NCT03379181).

News on infantile haemangioma. Part 2: therapy and evaluation.

Infantile haemangioma (IH) is the most frequently occurring tumour of childhood. While benign, in more than half of the cases, less or more severe sequelae can be observed. In Part 1 of this review, we discussed the clinical course and pathomechanism of IHs. In Part 2 of this state-of-the-art review, we will discuss the current management of IH and focus on the working mechanism of ß-blockers in IHs. Furthermore, we will discuss options for the evaluation of patients and their families (quality of life and family burden), as well as for the evaluation of IHs by healthcare providers, such as assessments of activity and severity. This review will update the reader on the working mechanism of propranolol in IHs and offer an oversight of tools (questionnaires and scoring systems) that can be used in clinical practice or for research.

Assessment of Oral Propranolol Administration for Infantile Hemangioma in Oral and Maxillofacial Region Aided by Ultrasonography.

BACKGROUND: Propranolol has become the first-line therapy for the treatment of complicated infantile hemangioma. However, there are still many queries regarding the hemangioma volume in relation to drug's dose and duration. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the therapeutic effect of oral propranolol for treating infantile hemangiomas in the oral and maxillofacial region aided by gray scale ultrasonography (GSU). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve patients with infantile hemangioma, age ranged between 2 and 11 months, have been treated with oral propranolol for 6 months' period. They received a dose of 1 mg/kg per body weight per day, increased after 1 week to 2 mg/ kg per body weight per day maintenance for 24 weeks. The changes in tumor sizes were evaluated by ultrasonography (GSU) using 4-points scale system: excellent, good, fair, poor) RESULTS:: All infants less than 6 months of age showed more hemangiomas regression in size in comparison with of those aged >6 months (P value 0.042) as a rapid response. After the 24 week; 5 patients had excellent results, 4 patients had good results, 2 patients had fair results, and only 1 patient had poor results. None of the treated infants showed rebound phenomena after cessation of treatment. CONCLUSION: Oral propranolol at dose of 2 mg/kg/day in 2 divided doses for 24 weeks aided by GSU is shown to be a safe and effective treatment of infantile hemangioma during the proliferative phase.

Efectividad del propranolol en el tratamiento de malformaciones vasculares cutáneas / Effectiveness of propranolol in treatment of cutaneous vascular malformations

Se realizó un estudio cuasi-experimental de series temporales para evaluar la efectividad del propranolol en el tratamiento de malformaciones vasculares cutáneas en 48 pacientes que asistieron a la consulta del Servicio de Dermatología del Hospital Central Universitario Dr. Antonio María Pineda durante el período febrero-julio 2018. Los resultados muestran que existen diferencias estadísticamente significativas (p <0.05; p0,0001) antes y después del primer mes de tratamiento con propranolol, las cuales se mantiene hasta los seis meses, con respecto al tamaño, color, consistencia y temperatura. Se espera que los resultados sirvan para proponer el uso de propranolol como una opción terapéutica no invasiva en el tratamiento de las malformaciones vasculares cutáneas(AU)

A quasi-experimental study of time series was carried out to evaluate the effectiveness of propranolol in the treatment of cutaneous vascular malformations in 48 patients attending the Dermatology Service of the Hospital Central Universitario Dr. Antonio Maria Pineda during the period February - July 2018. The results show that there are statistically significant differences (p <0.05; p0,0001) before and after treatment with propranolol starting one month post-treatment which are kept until six months, related to size, color, consistency and temperature of lesions. We hope that these results will encourage the use of propranolol as a non-invasive therapeutic option in the treatment of cutaneous vascular malformations(AU)

Clinical and economic impact of surgery for treating infantile hemangiomas in the era of propranolol: overview of single-center experience from La Paz Hospital, Madrid.

Propranolol has changed the management of infantile hemangiomas (IHs). We summarize the evolution of surgical treatment for IH at La Paz Children's Hospital (Madrid) in the era of propranolol, with a focus on hepatic IHs.Retrospectively, we compared surgical treatment of IHs in children referred during the periods 2004-2009 and 2009-2014. Hepatic IH mortality rates before and after the introduction of propranolol therapy were evaluated specifically.The majority of hemangiomas needing surgical excision were located on the head/face/scalp of female patients. Since the introduction of propranolol therapy, surgery for IH has decreased from about 60 to 6 procedures/year at our institution and no transplants for hepatic IH have been registered.Conclusions: Surgical procedures for IH have decreased by about 90% at our institution since the introduction of propranolol treatment and hepatic IH have not needed liver transplantation. Referrals for surgery for IH are generally the consequence of absent or delayed propranolol treatment. Given the significant reduction in the number of surgical procedures, propranolol can be considered as having a strong economic and social impact. What is Known: • The use of oral propranolol solution is currently considered as the treatment of choice in the management of infantile hemangiomas. • Propranolol treatment achieves better outcomes and less side effects than systemic corticosteroids. What is New: • Social and financial impact of the significant reduction in the number of reconstructive surgical procedures and liver transplants due to the use of propranolol in tertiary health institutions remains to be analyzed.

The Use of ß-Blockers for the Treatment of Periocular Hemangiomas in Infants: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

PURPOSE: To review the published literature assessing the efficacy of ß-blockers for the treatment of periocular hemangioma in infants. METHODS: Literature searches were conducted in May 2018 in PubMed with no date restrictions and limited to studies published in English and in the Cochrane Library database without any restrictions. The combined searches yielded 437 citations. Of these,16 articles were deemed appropriate for inclusion in this assessment and assigned a level of evidence rating by the panel methodologist. RESULTS: None of the 16 studies included in this assessment were rated level I, 3 were rated level II, and 13 were rated level III. The most common treatment regimen was 2 mg/kg daily oral propranolol, but intralesional and topical ß-blockers were also used. Treatment effect was most often measured in terms of reduction in the size of the lesions, which occurred in the majority of patients. ß-Blockers were consistently shown to reduce astigmatism, but this reduction was shown to be statistically significant in only 2 series. The effect of ß-blockers on amblyopia was not adequately documented. ß-Blockers were generally well tolerated and had mild side effects (fatigue, gastrointestinal upset/diarrhea, restlessness/sleep disturbances, minor wheezing, and cold extremities). Complications severe enough to require cessation of treatment occurred in only 2 patients out of a total of 229 who received ß-blockers. CONCLUSIONS: There is limited evidence to support the safety and efficacy of both topical and systemic ß-blockers to promote regression of periocular hemangiomas. Additional research may confirm the best dosage and route of administration to maximize efficacy in reducing induced astigmatism and amblyopia associated with periocular hemangiomas while minimizing side effects.

Cost-effectiveness of treating infantile haemangioma with propranolol in an outpatient setting.

BACKGROUND: Infantile haemangioma is one of the most commonly known benign vascular tumours of infancy and childhood, having an incidence of 3-10%. Most lesions regress spontaneously; however, some may require treatment owing to their clinical and cosmetic effects. Propranolol has become the treatment of choice for infantile haemangioma, but treatment protocols are largely institutional based without any specific consensus guidelines. Our aim was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of propranolol use as inpatient versus outpatient therapy. METHODS: A decision tree model was created depicting alternate strategies for initiating propranolol treatment on an inpatient versus outpatient basis combined with the option of a pretreatment echocardiogram applied to both strategies. Cost analysis was assumed to be based on treatment of haemangioma in patients who were born at term, had no chronic illnesses, a non-life-threatening location of the haemangioma, and those who were not taking any other medications that could potentiate the side effects of propranolol. A sensitivity analysis was performed to evaluate the probability of side effects. RESULTS: The average cost incurred for inpatient treatment of infantile haemangioma was approximately $2603 for a single hospital day and increased to $2843 with the addition of an echocardiogram. The expected cost of treatment in the outpatient setting was $138, which increased to $828 after the addition of an echocardiogram. CONCLUSION: Treating infantile haemangioma with propranolol is more cost-effective when initiated on an outpatient basis.

Repurposing existing medications as cancer therapy: design and feasibility of a randomized pilot investigating propranolol administration in patients receiving hematopoietic cell transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Repurposing existing medications for antineoplastic purposes can provide a safe, cost-effective, and efficacious means to further augment available cancer care. Clinical and preclinical studies suggest a role for the ß-adrenergic antagonist (ß-blocker) propranolol in reducing rates of tumor progression in both solid and hematologic malignancies. In patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), the peri-transplant period is a time of increased activity of the ß-adrenergically-mediated stress response. METHODS: We conducted a proof-of-concept randomized controlled pilot study assessing the feasibility of propranolol administration to patients between ages 18-75 who received an autologous HCT for multiple myeloma. Feasibility was assessed by enrollment rate, tolerability, adherence, and retention. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-four patients underwent screening; 31 (20%) enrolled in other oncology trials that precluded dual trial enrollment and 9 (6%) declined to enroll in the current trial. Eighty-nine (58%) did not meet eligibility requirements and 25 (16%) were eligible; of the remaining eligible patients, all were successfully enrolled and randomized. The most common reasons for ineligibility were current ß-blocker use, age, logistics, and medical contraindications. 92% of treatment arm patients tolerated and remained on propranolol for the study duration; 1 patient discontinued due to hypotension. Adherence rate in assessable patients (n = 10) was 94%. Study retention was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Findings show that it is feasible to recruit and treat multiple myeloma patients with propranolol during HCT, with the greatest obstacle being other competing oncology trials. These data support further studies examining propranolol and other potentially repurposed drugs in oncology populations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This randomized controlled trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov with the identifier NCT02420223 on April 17, 2015.

Management trends of infantile hemangioma: A national perspective.

INTRODUCTION: The primary management of infantile hemangioma (IH) has changed since 2008, with the initiation of propranolol. The change that propranolol has affected on resource utilization is unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Kids' Inpatient Database (KID) in 2003, 2006, 2009, and 2012 was queried for ICD-9 codes for IH in children under age three. The number of patients undergoing the following procedures of interest: tracheostomy, tracheoscopy and laryngoscopy with biopsy, and excision of skin lesion were evaluated. Data was analyzed for demographics and details on the admission. Trends were identified. Weighted statistical analyses were performed with SAS 9.4. RESULTS: The number of qualified admissions significantly increased over the years (9271 in 2003-12029 in 2012, OR 1.042 per year increase, p < 0.001). The mean age at admission ranged from 26 to 28 days but did not vary over time (p = 0.54). The percentage undergoing tracheostomy significantly decreased from 1.05% in 2003 to 0.27% in 2012 (p = 0.0055), and the percentage undergoing tracheoscopy and laryngoscopy with biopsy significantly decreased from 7.29% in 2003 to 4.20% in 2012 (p = 0.011) among those with IH of unspecified or other sites. The percentage undergoing skin lesion excision also significantly decreased from 1.87% in 2003 to 1.03%, in 2012 (p = 0.0038) among those with IH of skin and subcutaneous tissue. These findings suggest a potential impact of propranolol. After adjusting for inflation, the total hospital charges increased from a mean of $17,838 in 2003 to an adjusted mean of $41,306 in 2012 (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Total admissions and hospital charges in children with IH has increased from 2003 to 2012. The percentage of patients undergoing tracheostomy, tracheoscopy and laryngoscopy with biopsy, and skin lesion excision significantly decreased in 2012 compared to 2003, suggesting a potential impact of propranolol. Further studies are needed to examine these changes more closely.

Assessment of the effectiveness of topical propranolol 4% gel for infantile hemangiomas.

BACKGROUND: Infantile hemangiomas (IHs) are the most common vascular tumors in children. Because of their benign character and natural involution, the vast majority of IHs do not require any treatment. In the past few years, topical beta blockers have been reported to be an effective treatment of superficial IHs. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety profile of topical propranolol 4% gel for the treatment of IHs. METHODS: A retrospective study of all cases of IHs treated with topical propranolol 4% gel between 2013 and 2015 was performed. All patients were evaluated in a pediatric dermatology unit of a tertiary medical center. Epidemiologic, clinical, and treatment data, including effectiveness score and safety, were reviewed. RESULTS: The study included 63 patients with a total of 75 IHs. Of the total number of IHs, 43 (57.3%) showed a good response to treatment, 19 (25.3%) a partial response, and 13 (17.33%) poor or no response, thus 62 (82.6%) had good or partial response to treatment. Age at treatment initiation, treatment time, thickness of the superficial component, and size of the lesions were shown to predict response to therapy. Out of the entire examined group, only two patients reported minor local side effects manifested by irritation, redness, and scaling of the treated area. No systemic adverse effects were reported. LIMITATIONS: This is an uncontrolled retrospective study. CONCLUSION: Propranolol 4% gel is a safe and efficient topical therapy for IH.

Oral propranolol for infantile hemangiomas: a prospective study on the role of 48-hour Holter monitoring in additional safety assessment.

PURPOSE: Oral propranolol has been recently approved for infantile hemangiomas (IHs), but potential side effects stay a challenge. We sought to make an additional assessment on oral propranolol safety for this indication. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective study included 108 infants consecutively treated for IHs at the University Children's Hospital Tirsova, Belgrade from January 2010 to December 2013. Propranolol was administered orally at a daily dose of 0.5 mg/kg and doubled every 48 hours in the absence of side effects until reaching the maximum dose of 2 mg/kg daily. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rate were measured every 48 hours with clinical observation. Heart rate was monitored by standard electrocardiogram (ECG) and 48-hour Holter ECG. RESULTS: Statistically significant, but asymptomatic decreases in systolic blood pressure and heart rate recorded by Holter ECG were observed during the first doubling of dose and then remained stable. Arrhythmias were not detected. Despite mild sleep disturbance observed in 31% of infants in the hospital milieu, Holter monitoring indicated circadian rhythm maintenance. CONCLUSIONS: Oral propranolol for IHs does not remarkably affect heart rhythm including circadian variations throughout hospital initiation. Therefore, there is no necessity for Holter monitoring in additional safety assessment.

Ultrasonography as an objective tool for assessment of infantile hemangioma treatment with propranolol.

BACKGROUND: Infantile hemangiomas (IHs) are the most common benign vascular tumors of childhood. Propranolol is an effective drug in treating IH. A reliable and complementary instrument is necessary to evaluate IH response to propranolol in addition to clinical and photographic assessments. Ultrasonography is a simple and non-invasive technique that enables precise measurements of tumor size and contributes to objective follow-up. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the use of serial ultrasonography as an adjunctive tool for assessment of IH treatment with propranolol. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective study of 19 patients with IH treated with propranolol was conducted from January 2009 to March 2014. Data of individual IH volume at the beginning and at least 6 months after the onset of treatment and overall volume reduction by ultrasonographic measurement were obtained. RESULTS: We observed a statistically significant IH volume reduction of approximately 0.51 cm3 . This volume corresponds to an average reduction of 47% in the final volume compared with the initial volume. CONCLUSION: Ultrasonographic measurements contribute to demonstrate tumor regression and IH response to propranolol. Thus, ultrasonography is an important instrument to guide therapeutic strategies.

The Role of the Pharmacist in the Treatment of Patients with Infantile Hemangioma Using Propranolol.

INTRODUCTION: Infantile hemangiomas (IH) are the most common benign vascular tumors of childhood, with an incidence of 5-10% during the first year of age. Propranolol is considered the first-line treatment for this condition. Potentially there is a high probability of negative results to therapy, because in many countries there are no treatment protocols or propranolol formulations appropriate for the pediatric population. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the impact of pharmacist interventions such as detecting, analyzing, and solving problems presented during treatment with propranolol in patients with IH. METHODS: An open observational prospective study was performed over 25 months in a group of pediatric patients diagnosed with infantile hemangioma treated with propranolol. Pharmacist participation consisted of development of an extemporaneous formulation and counseling the child's parents. At each visit to the pharmacy service, family members were interviewed, detecting and classifying problems related to treatment. RESULTS: Sixty-three children with IH were treated during the period under review. Patient ages ranged from 3 to 11 months old; 64% were female and 36% were male. Forty-nine problems in 30 patients were detected, principally inadequate dose (18.4%), non-adherence to treatment (16.3%), side effects (14.3%), and wrong administration (14.3%). Of the problems detected, 81.6% were resolved. Interventions by the pharmacist in 27 patients were intensive counseling on adherence to therapy (20%), detection of adverse effects (11.4%), and adjustment of the dose (22.9%). In 95.2% of patients a good response to treatment was obtained compared with 77.2% reported in European studies without pharmacist intervention. CONCLUSION: It seems that pharmacist participation increases adherence to treatment and reduces the likelihood of adverse effects, allowing for safe and effective therapy in patients with IH.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of interventions for migraine in four low- and middle-income countries.

BACKGROUND: Evidence of the cost and effects of interventions for reducing the global burden of migraine remains scarce. Our objective was to estimate the population-level cost-effectiveness of evidence-based migraine interventions and their contributions towards reducing current burden in low- and middle-income countries. METHODS: Using a standard WHO approach to cost-effectiveness analysis (CHOICE), we modelled core set intervention strategies for migraine, taking account of coverage and efficacy as well as non-adherence. The setting was primary health care including pharmacies. We modelled 26 intervention strategies implemented during 10 years. These included first-line acute and prophylactic drugs, and the expected consequences of adding consumer-education and provider-training. Total population-level costs and effectiveness (healthy life years [HLY] gained) were combined to form average and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. We executed runs of the model for the general populations of China, India, Russia and Zambia. RESULTS: Of the strategies considered, acute treatment of attacks with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) was by far the most cost-effective and generated a HLY for less than US$ 100. Adding educational actions increased annual costs by 1-2 US cents per capita of the population. Cost-effectiveness ratios then became slightly less favourable but still less than US$ 100 per HLY gained for ASA. An incremental cost of > US$ 10,000 would have to be paid per extra HLY by adding a triptan in a stepped-care treatment paradigm. For prophylaxis, amitriptyline was more cost-effective than propranolol or topiramate. CONCLUSIONS: Self-management with simple analgesics was by far the most cost-effective strategy for migraine treatment in low- and middle-income countries and represents a highly efficient use of health resources. Consumer education and provider training are expected to accelerate progress towards desired levels of coverage and adherence, cost relatively little to implement, and can therefore be considered also economically attractive. Evidence-based interventions for migraine should have as much a claim on scarce health resources as those for other chronic, non-communicable conditions that impose a significant burden on societies.

Endoscopic ultrasonography assessment of para-esophageal varices predicts efficacy of propranolol in preventing recurrence of esophageal varices.

BACKGROUND: Volume of para-esophageal varices (PEV) correlates with esophageal varices recurrence. The effect of propranolol on volumetric change of PEV has not been studied. The relation between EV recurrence and volumetric change of PEV in patients undergoing endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) with and without propranolol are studied. METHODS: Sixty-six patients who achieved EV eradication by primary EVL were randomly allocated to a propranolol group (n = 33) or control group (n = 33). The endpoints of the study were EV recurrence and volumetric change of PEV assessed by using endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) at 3-month intervals for 2 years. RESULTS: The cumulative probability of recurrence at two years was 28% in the propranolol group (n = 9) and 68% in the control group (n = 20) (p = 0.005, log-rank test). Difference of the volumetric change of PEV became significant as early as at the third month [-0.12 (-0.38-0.34) vs. 0.14 (-0.06-0.57), p < 0.001] between the two groups. Regression of PEV was achieved in 20 patients of the propranolol group at a median time of three months (range 3-12 months), and no EV recurrence was found at the end of follow-up for two years. On multivariate analysis, the volumetric change of PEV at the third month and use of propranolol were determinants of EV recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Propranolol may reduce both EV recurrence rate and volume of PEV in patients achieving endoscopic eradication. Regression of PEV is a predictor of durable eradication of EV without recurrence in patients using propranolol. EUS is an objective and useful tool to measure PEV and predict recurrence of EV.

The Paediatric migraine disability assessment score is a useful tool for evaluating prophylactic migraine treatment.

AIM: There is a need for an objective assessment scoring system to evaluate the effectiveness of prophylactic drugs in paediatric migraine, and the aim of this study was to evaluate the Paediatric Migraine Disability Assessment Score (PedMIDAS). METHODS: We recruited 88 children aged between 6 and 17 years of age with migraine. The 53 children in the treatment group were divided into three groups according to the prophylactic drug they received topiramate, flunarizine and propranolol and assessed using PedMIDAS before the start of treatment and 3 and 6 months after treatment. The 35 patients in the control group did not receive prophylactic treatment and were assessed with PedMIDAS on three occasions, 3 months apart. RESULTS: Topiramate, propranolol and flunarizine treatments significantly decreased PedMIDASs and were shown to be effective in improving the patients' quality of life. Topiramate and propranolol were more effective than flunarizine. The number of days on analgesic treatment significantly decreased in the patients who had received topiramate and propranolol treatments (p < 0.05), but remained unchanged in the flunarizine prophylaxis group (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The PedMIDAS scoring system is useful in evaluating the efficacy of prophylactic therapy in paediatric migraine. Topiramate and propranolol lowered the PedMIDASs better than flunarizine.

Assessment of cognitive function while on low-dose propranolol: implications for usage by survivors in a disabled submarine.

While awaiting rescue from a disabled submarine (DISSUB), survivors will likely endure an atmosphere of rising CO2 which will eventually be lethal. Previously, it was determined that low-dose propranolol reduces resting metabolic carbon dioxide production and therefore may increase survival time in this scenario. The actions and decisions survivors would carry out in a DISSUB situation would require an unaltered cognition state. Therefore, we wanted to determine if low-dose propranolol impairs cognitive function. Eight healthy males completed a counterbalanced, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded crossover study in which each subject received propranolol (40 mg twice daily) or placebo (lactose pill twice daily) over a 72-hour period. The alternate condition was separated by a minimum 96-hour washout period. Subjects performed a series of 6 tasks from the Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM) battery and answered a self-report sleepiness scale each morning and afternoon. Subjects exhibited increased accuracy in one of the ANAM tasks while on propranolol compared to placebo, but showed no difference between treatments on the other 5 tasks and sleepiness scale. These results suggest that 40 mg of propranolol taken twice daily does not significantly impair cognitive function and may be a viable option for use in a DISSUB scenario.

Propranolol vs corticosteroids for infantile hemangiomas: a multicenter retrospective analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether propranolol therapy is safe and effective and superior to oral corticosteroids for treating infantile hemangiomas (IHs). DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective chart review. SETTING: University of Miami and Miami Children's Hospital, Miami, Florida. Patients  The study included 110 patients with IHs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The percentage of clearance was quantified by documented serial global photography and clinical examinations (length, height, and width) to segregate patients into 2 groups: patients who had clearance of 75% or more and patients who had less than 75% clearance. RESULTS: The mean duration of treatment was 7.9 months for propranolol and 5.2 months for oral corticosteroids. Fifty-six of 68 patients (82%) who were receiving propranolol achieved clearance of 75% or more compared with 12 of 42 patients (29%) who were receiving oral corticosteroids (P < .01). Adverse effects were minimal in the propranolol group: 1 patient had hypoglycemia and 2 patients had a nonspecifice skin eruption that was not associated with propranolol therapy. All 42 patients in the corticosteroid group had 1 or more adverse effects (P < .01). Relapse after discontinuation of propranolol therapy occurred in 2 of the 68 patients; however, both patients responded to propranolol therapy on reinitiation of treatment. Surgical referrals after treatment were required in 8 patients (12%) in the propranolol group and 12 patients (29%) in the oral corticosteroid group (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Propranolol therapy was more clinically effective and more cost-effective than oral corticosteroids in treating IHs. It also resulted in fewer surgical interventions and demonstrated better tolerance, with minimal adverse effects, compared with oral corticosteroids. Therefore, propranolol should be considered a first-line agent given its safety and efficacy in the treatment of IHs.