Enhancing continence post holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: assessment of novel technique through randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Transient urinary incontinence (UI) is distressing event following holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP). Novel technique namely, veil sparing HoLEP (VS-HoLEP), was proposed to improve early continence outcome. In this trial (NCT03494049), VS-HoLEP was compared to standard HoLEP (St-HoLEP). METHODS: VS-HoLEP entails early apical separation with sparing of ventral apical mucosal veil proximal to the verumontanum. Eligible symptomatic BPH patients were randomly allocated to St-HoLEP (91) and VS-HoLEP (89). The primary outcome was UI as depicted by one-hour pad test at one month postoperatively. Other outcome measures include all perioperative parameters, complications, and urinary outcome measures at different follow-up points. RESULTS: Median preoperative prostate size was 138 (50:282) and 128 (50:228) mL in St-HoLEP and VS-HoLEP groups respectively. At one month the number of patients with positive one-hour pad test was 21 (23.1%) and 10 (11.4%) in St-HoLEP and VS-HoLEP groups respectively (P 0.047). The difference was significantly in favor of VS-HoLEP considering the number of patients reporting UI, the number of patients with positive one-hour pad test as well as the grade of UI reported at one and 4 months. The difference was not statistically significant at 12 months. The median time to patients' reported continence was 8 (1-52) and 1.5 (1-52) weeks in St-HoLEP and VS-HoLEP groups respectively (P≤0.005). The technique independently predicted positive one-hour pad test at one and four months respectively. At twelve months presence of DM (diabetes mellitus) and more percent PSA reduction independently predicted positive one-hour pad test. CONCLUSIONS: Veil sparing HoLEP enhances significantly early postoperative urine continence both subjectively and objectively. Optimization of the surgical technique could cut short the number of leaking patients and reduce the degree as well as the duration of transient postoperative urine leak.

Screening of Associated Factors for Erectile Dysfunction after Radical Prostatectomy and Construction of a Clinical Risk Assessment Model: A Retrospective Study.

OBJECTIVE: In this article, the associated factors for erectile dysfunction (ED) after radical prostatectomy (RP) were explored, and a clinical risk assessment model was constructed. METHODS: A total of 155 patients who underwent RP in People's Hospital of Hunan Province from November 2020, to November 2021, were selected as the study group. In accordance with the results of International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) at 6 months after surgery, 88 patients were included in the ED group (IIEF-5 <22), and 67 patients were included in the non-ED group (IIEF-5 ≥22). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to screen the risk factors for ED after RP, and a risk model was constructed on this basis. In addition, 43 patients with ED after RP and 41 patients with non-ED after RP from January 2022, to January 2023, were included in the test group to evaluate the predictive efficacy of the clinical risk assessment model on the basis of the receiver operating characteristic curve. RESULTS: The study group had a lower postoperative IIEF-5 score than before surgery (p < 0.001). The incidence of ED after RP in the study group was 56.77% (88/155). Multivariate analysis showed that advanced age (odds ratio (OR) = 1.155), large prostate volume (OR = 1.077), smoking (OR = 5.676), drinking (OR = 3.495), hypertension (OR = 8.079), diabetes (OR = 6.082), low preoperative serum testosterone (T) level (OR = 0.684) and high preoperative serum endothelin-1 (ET-1) level (OR = 1.192) were risk factors for ED after RP (p < 0.05). A risk model was constructed as follows: Z = 0.144 × (age) + 0.074 × (prostate volume) + 1.736 × (smoking) + 1.251 × (drinking) + 2.089 × (hypertension) + 1.805 × (diabetes) - 0.380 × (preoperative serum T) + 0.175 × (preoperative serum ET-1). The area under curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity and 95% CI of this model were 0.906, 97.70%, 73.20%, and 0.848-0.964, respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The clinical risk assessment model constructed on the basis of the above factors provides some references for the scientific prevention and treatment of ED after RP.

Assessment of different continence definitions in the context of the randomized multicenter prospective LAP-01 trial-Does the best definition change over time?

BACKGROUND: A uniform definition of continence is urgently needed to allow the comparison of study results and to estimate patient outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP). To identify a practical definition that includes both objective and subjective aspects in a tangible way, we assessed different continence definitions and evaluated which best reflects the patients' subjective perception of continence. METHODS: Our analyses included 718 patients that underwent either robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) or laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) in a multicenter randomized patient-blinded trial. Continence was assessed through patient questionnaires prior to and at 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery which included the number of pads used per day, the ICIQ-SF and the question "Do you suffer from incontinence? (yes/no)" to assess subjective continence. We used Krippendorff's Alpha to calculate the agreement of different continence definitions with the subjective perception. RESULTS: At 3 months, the "0/safety pad" definition shows the highest agreement by alpha = 0.70 (vs. 0.63 for "0 pads" and 0.37 for "0-1 pad"). At 6 and 12 months "0 pads" is the better match, with alpha values of 0.69 (vs. 0.62 and 0.31) after 6 months and 0.70 (vs. 0.65 and 0.32) after 12 months. The ICIQ-SF score shows good correlation with the subjective continence at 3 months (alpha = - 0.79), the coefficient then decreasing to - 0.69 and - 0.59 at 6 and 12 months. CONCLUSION: The best continence definition according to the patients' perspective changes over time, "0 pads" being the superior criterion in the long-term. We recommend using the 0-pad definition for standardized continence reporting, as it is simple yet as accurate as possible given the inevitably high subjectivity of continence perception. Trial registration The LAP-01 trial was registered with the U.S. National Library of Medicine clinical trial registry (clinicaltrials.gov), NCT number: NCT03682146, and with the German Clinical Trial registry (Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien), DRKS ID number: DRKS00007138.

Robot-Assisted Surgery and Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Post-Prostatectomy Outcomes Among Prostate Cancer Patients.

BACKGROUND: We sought to determine whether the differences in short-term outcomes between patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and those treated with open radical prostatectomy (ORP) differ by race and ethnicity. METHODS: This observational study used New York State Cancer Registry data linked to discharge records and included patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer during 2008-2018. We used logistic regression to examine the association between race and ethnicity (non-Hispanic White [NHW], non-Hispanic Black [NHB], Hispanic), surgical approach (RARP, ORP), and postoperative outcomes (major events, prolonged length of stay [pLOS], 30-day re-admission). We tested interaction between race and ethnicity and surgical approach on multiplicative and additive scales. RESULTS: The analytical cohort included 18,926 patients (NHW 14,215 [75.1%], NHB 3195 [16.9%], Hispanic 1516 [8.0%]). The average age was 60.4 years (standard deviation 7.1). NHB and Hispanic patients had lower utilization of RARP and higher risks of postoperative adverse events than NHW patients. NHW, NHB, and Hispanic patients all had reduced risks of adverse events when undergoing RARP versus ORP. The absolute reductions in the risks of major events and pLOS following RARP versus ORP were larger among NHB {relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI): major events -0.32 [95% confidence interval (CI) -0.71 to -0.03]; pLOS -0.63 [95% CI -0.98 to -0.35]) and Hispanic (RERI major events -0.27 [95% CI -0.77 to 0.09]; pLOS -0.93 [95% CI -1.46 to -0.51]) patients than among NHW patients. The interaction was absent on the multiplicative scale. CONCLUSIONS: RARP use has not penetrated and benefited all racial and ethnic groups equally. Increasing utilization of RARP among NHB and Hispanic patients may help reduce disparities in patient outcomes after radical prostatectomy.

The assessment of erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy using pudendal somatosensory evoked potential.

Erectile dysfunction in patients who underwent radical prostatectomy was evaluated with pudendal somatosensory evoked potentials (PSEP) to measure and predict erectile dysfunction objectively. Fifty-seven patients who completed requirements were included in the study. Patients were divided into 2 groups (potency/non-potency). Erectile function recovery was defined as question 2 and 3 on the IIEF-5 questionnaire at 12 months after surgery. The two-channel PSEP test was performed at the day before RP and 3-6 months after RP. Twenty patients were assigned to the potency group and 37 to the non-potency group. Mean age was less in the potency group. Other clinical variables were similar in two groups. The non-potency group had prolonged lumbar and cortical latencies in postoperative PSEP, and the mean differences of latencies between pre- and postoperative PSEP in lumbar and cortical regions were also greater in the non-potency group. Logistic regression analysis showed that age, lumbar post-operative latency, cortical post-operative latency, and difference of latency in lumbar region were associated with non-potency; odds ratios were 1.292 (p = 0.018), 0.425 (p = 0.047), 1.637 (p < 0.001), and 3.272 (p = 0.010), respectively. This study suggests that PSEP is an effective means of evaluating erectile dysfunction in prostate cancer patients after surgery.

Development and assessment of a self-management intervention for urinary incontinence among patients with prostate cancer: protocol for a randomized feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: Urinary incontinence is a common complication among patients with prostate cancer who have undergone radical prostatectomy. Guided by social cognitive theory and a framework for the recovery of health and well-being, we propose to develop and test a self-management intervention for patients with prostate cancer who experience urinary incontinence after undergoing radical prostatectomy. METHODS: In this study, a self-management intervention for urinary incontinence (SMI-UI) is developed, comprising a mobile self-management application, a self-management handbook, and professional support. The feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of this intervention will be assessed. Patient data from the urology departments of two hospitals will be collected through convenience sampling by adopting an experimental, parallel, and random assignment research design. Patients experiencing urinary incontinence after undergoing radical prostatectomy will be invited to participate. After completing the pretest questionnaire, patients will be randomly divided into the experimental and attention control groups. The experimental group will undergo a 12-week SMI-UI, whereas the attention control group will receive an intervention consisting of a single dietetic education information package. The two groups will be tested 12 and 16 weeks after the pretest. In this study, we recorded the sociodemographic and clinical variables; recruitment rate; retention rate; satisfaction with the intervention; cancer-related self-efficacy; urination symptoms and disturbance; social participation and satisfaction; resilience; and demoralization. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05335967 [date of registration 04-04-2022].

Lived experiences of prostate cancer patients in an urban metropolis in North Central, Nigeria.

Prostate cancer (PCa) is currently the second most prevalent cancer in the world and the most common type of cancer among Nigerian men. This study explored the lived experiences of patients with PCa at the General Hospital in Ilorin, Kwara State, Nigeria. A mixed-method design was adopted. Purposive and consecutive sampling techniques were employed to recruit 50 and 10 participants for the quantitative and qualitative aspects respectively. Qualitative data was analyzed using thematic content analysis while quantitative data was analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. All participants were above the age of 50 years, 72% earned about $100 monthly while 68% were diagnosed in less than five years. Majority of the participants utilized adaptive coping styles and also found the strategies moderately helpful while living with the effects of radical prostatectomy. Participants also found the high cost of treatment severely challenging. Government and other stakeholders may need to subsidize the cost of PCa management thereby encouraging early accessibility to care, improved adherence to treatment and also reduce the economic burden of the disease on patients and their families.

The role of cytoreductive radical prostatectomy and lymph node dissection in bone-metastatic prostate cancer: A population-based study.

BACKGROUNDS: The role of cytoreductive radical prostatectomy (cRP) for bone-metastatic prostate cancer (bmPCa) remains controversial. We aimed to figure out whether cRP and lymph node dissection (LND) can benefit bmPCa. METHODS: 11,271 PCa patients with bone metastatic burden from 2010 to 2019 were identified using SEER-Medicare. Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates were visualized using Kaplan-Meier plots. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were constructed to examine the effects of cRP and LND on survival, after stratifying to age, prostate specific antigen (PSA), clinical stages, Gleason score, metastatic burden, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy status. RESULTS: 317 PCa patients underwent cRP and cRP was increasingly performed for bmPCa from 2010 (2.2%) to 2019 (3.0%) (p < 0.05). In multi analyses, cRP was predisposed to a better OS or CSS in patients with age < 75, PSA < 98 ng/mL, bone-only metastatic sites or patients not receiving chemotherapy (all p < 0.05). For the patients undergoing cRP, LND especially extended LND was associated with a better OS or CSS (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: cRP might benefit OS or CSS in young patients with low PSA and bone-only metastatic sites not receiving chemotherapy. And a clear OS or CSS benefit of LND especially extended LND was observed in patients undergoing cRP.

Disparities in access to robotic technology and perioperative outcomes among patients treated with radical prostatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Most radical prostatectomies are completed with robotic assistance. While studies have previously evaluated perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), this study investigates disparities in access and clinical outcomes of RARP. STUDY DESIGN: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was used to identify patients who received radical prostatectomy for cancer between 2010 and 2017 with outcomes through 2018. RARP was compared to open radical prostatectomy (ORP). Odds of receiving RARP were evaluated while adjusting for covariates. Overall survival was evaluated using a propensity-score matched cohort. RESULTS: Overall, 354 752 patients were included with 297 676 (83.9%) receiving RARP. Patients who were non-Hispanic Black (82.8%) or Hispanic (81.3%) had lower rates of RARP than non-Hispanic White (84.0%) or Asian patients (87.7%, p < 0.001). Medicaid or uninsured patients were less likely to receive RARP (75.5%) compared to patients with Medicare or private insurance (84.4%, p < 0.001). Medicaid or uninsured status was associated with decreased odds of RARP in adjusted multivariable analysis (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.49-0.76). RARP was associated with decreased perioperative mortality and improved overall survival compared to ORP. CONCLUSION: Patients who were underinsured were less likely to receive RARP. Improved access to RARP may lead to decreased disparities in perioperative outcomes for prostate cancer.

Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy after previous trans-urethral resection of the prostate: Assessment of functional and oncological outcomes.

BACKGROUND: no data exist concerning functional and oncological outcomes of Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RS-RARP), in patients previously treated with trans-urethral resection of the prostate (p-TURP), for benign prostate obstruction. Our study addressed the impact of p-TURP on immediate and 12-months urinary continence recovery (UCR), as well as peri-operative outcomes and surgical margins, after RS-RARP. METHODS: all patients treated with RS-RARP for prostate cancer at a single high-volume European institution, between 2010 and 2021, were identified and stratified according to p-TURP status. Logistic, Poisson and Cox regression models were performed. RESULTS: Of 1386 RS-RARP patients, 99 (7%) had history of p-TURP. Between p-TURP and no-TURP patients no differences were detected regarding both intra- and post-operative complications (p values = 0.9). The rates of immediate UCR were 40 vs 67% in p-TURP vs no-TURP patients (p < 0.001). At 12 months from RS-RARP, the rates of UCR were 68 vs 94% in p-TURP vs no-TURP patients (p < 0.001). At multivariable logistic and Cox regression models, p-TURP was independently associated, respectively, with lower immediate (odds ratio [OR]: 0.32, p < 0.001) and 12-months UCR (hazard ratio: 0.54, p < 0.001). At multivariable Poisson analyses, p-TURP predicted longer operative time (rate ratio: 1.08, p < 0.001) but not longer length of stay or time to catheter removal (p values > 0.05). Positive surgical margins rates were 23 vs 17% in p-TURP vs no-TURP patients (p = 0.1), which translated in a non-statistically significant multivariable OR of 1.14 (p = 0.6). CONCLUSIONS: p-TURP does not increase surgical morbidity but portends longer operative time and worse urinary continence after RS-RARP.

Assessment of oligometastasis status of prostate cancer following combined robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and androgen deprivation versus androgen deprivation therapy alone using PSA percentage decline rate.

Objective: To compare the tumor control in prostate cancer patients with oligo-metastasis following combined robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and androgen deprivation versus androgen deprivation therapy alone based on total prostate-specific antigen (tPSA) assessment. Methods: Medical data of a total of 18 prostate cancer patients with oligometastasis administered in The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University from March 2017 to March 2018 were prospectively collected. 10 patients received a combined therapy of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and pharmaceutical androgen deprivation (RARP+ADT group), while 8 patients received pharmaceutical androgen deprivation therapy alone (ADT group). Then demographic characteristics, prostate volume, tumor characteristics and tPSA data were analysised and compared. Statistical analysis was performed using t-test for continuous variables and Pearson chi-square test or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. Results: No significant difference was found in patients' age (p = 0.075), prostate volume (p = 0.134) and number of bone metastasis (p = 0.342). Pre-treatment Gleason score was significantly lower in RA group (p = 0.003). Patients in RARP+ADT group had significantly lower pre-treatment tPSA (p = 0.014), while no statistical difference was noted in reexamined tPSA (p = 0.140) on follow-up. No statistical difference was noted in tPSA decline rates (declined tPSA value per day) in RARP+ADT and ADT group (8.1 ± 4.7 verse 7.5 ± 8.0 ng/ml/d, p = 0.853). However, tPSA percentage decline rate (declined tPSA percentage per day) was significantly higher in RARP+ADT group (11.6 ± 1.5%/d verses 2.9 ± 2.2%/d, p< 0.001). Immediate urinary continence was achieved in 9 patients (90%) upon removal of urethral catheter on post-operative day 7 in RARP+ADT group. Conclusion: ADT alone and in combination with RARP both provide effective tumor control in patients suffering from prostate cancer with oligometastasis. ADT combined with RARP exhibited significant advantage in PSA percentage decline rate without compromising patients' urinary continence. Long-term tumor control requires further follow-up.

Assessment of the Impact of Pentafecta Parameters Affecting the Quality of Life of Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy.

Prostate cancer is being detected in increasingly younger men. These patients expect to preserve their current quality of life and quickly recover after treatment. Medical technology and surgical techniques are advancing along with the growing expectations of patients. In addition, the universal method of assessing the quality of outcomes after operations is constantly being researched. As of today, biochemical remission alone, after radical prostatectomy, is insufficient for the patient. Therefore, multi-parametric evaluation methods are being developed, such as trifecta, which assesses biochemical remission, continence, and erectile function. The improvement over the trifecta is the pentafecta, which additionally evaluates postoperative complications and infiltration of surgical margins. Our study was conducted within a group of patients who were surgically treated for prostate cancer in 2017 at the Clinic of Urology and Urological Oncology of the Pomeranian Medical University. We recruited 237 men for the study. From that group, 131 men met the criteria to be included in the analysis. Maintaining continence (87.78%) is the easiest pentafecta parameter to obtain and will have the greatest impact on quality of life in the future. Maintaining biochemical remission (82.44%) is the second most important aspect for the patient. Retaining erectile function is the most difficult pentafecta parameter to obtain (29.01%) while having little impact on the quality of life. Negative surgical margins (66.41%) showed a negligible impact on the quality of life. The occurrence of complications (32.07%) has a negative impact on the quality of life of patients, but only during the treatment of complications.

Functional outcomes after prostate cancer treatment: A comparison between single and multiple modalities.

Prostate cancer is a widely common and treatable disease, and functional outcomes can greatly affect survivor quality of life. A retrospective review of the SEER-Medicare database was performed to identify patients who underwent prostate cancer treatment between January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2013 and review the rates of diagnosis and treatment of common functional side effects of surgery, radiation, or a combination of the 2 and perform a comparison of the outcomes. A total of 67,527 patients were included in the analysis. Radiation therapy (RT)-only compared to radical prostatectomy (RP)-only had lower rates of diagnosis of erectile dysfunction (30.4%, 95% CI 29.9%-30.9% vs. 56.1%, 95% CI 55.1%-57.04%, P < 0.0001), UI (29.7%, 95% CI 29.0%-30.3% vs. 44.5%, 95% CI 43.3%-45.6%, P < 0.0001), but higher rates of urethral stricture disease (8.44%, 95% CI 8.1%-8.8% vs. 5.35%, 95% CI 4.9%-5.9%, P < 0.0001), cystitis (33.1% 95% CI 32.4%-33.7% vs. 20.3%, 95% CI 19.2%-21.4%, P < 0.0001), and proctitis (14.7%, 95% CI 14.3%-15.1& vs. 2.75%, 95% CI 2.3%-3.3%, P < 0.0001). Compared to either single modality, the RP-then-RT group had higher incontinence medication use (12.0% 95% CI 10.8%-13.2% vs. 9.8%, 95% CI 9.5%-10.1% for RT-only and 8.3%, 95% CI 7.8%-8.8% for RP-only, P < 0.0001), overall incontinence therapy (18.5%, 95%CI 17.1%-20.0% vs. 10.2%, 95%CI 9.9%-10.5% for RT-only and 14.9%, 95% CI 14.3%-15.5% for RP-only, P < 0.0001), and stricture therapy (12.7%, 95% CI 11.5%-13.9% vs. 8.2%, 95% CI 8.0%-8.5% for RT-only and 9.1% 95% CI 8.6%-9.6% for RP-only, P < 0.0001). The RT-then-RP group had higher rates of stricture (25.4% compared to 8.2% for RT-only, 9.1% for RP-only, and 12.7% for RP-then-RT) and fistula (1.0% compared to 0.07% for RT-only, 0.18% for RP-only, and 0.092% for RP-then-RT) treatment than all the other groups. Multimodality therapy is generally associated with higher treatments rates for conditions such as erectile dysfunction , incontinence, urethral stricture disease , irritative cystitis and proctitis in patients older than 65. Radiation therapy followed by prostatectomy is associated with significantly worse functional outcomes. Patients undergoing or anticipating undergoing multimodality therapy for prostate cancer should be counseled regarding the possibility of increased risk of declining functional outcomes.

Radical prostatectomy readmissions: Causes, risk factors, national rates, & costs.

INTRODUCTION: Readmissions have substantial clinical and financial impacts on the healthcare system. Radical prostatectomy (RP) is considered a standard treatment in the management of clinically localized prostate cancer. Yet, there is a paucity of research evaluating readmissions for RP in a national dataset. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with histologically confirmed prostate cancer managed with RP were identified within the 2016 to 2018 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Patient factors, facility factors, and surgical characteristics were evaluated for associations with readmission using univariable and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: A total of 133,727 patients receiving RP were identified. Early (30-day) and late (31-90-day) readmission rates were 4.2% and 1.8% respectively. The most common cause of early readmission was postoperative digestive system complication (10%) and the most common cause of late readmission was septicemia (13%). On multivariable logistic regression, factors associated with both early and late readmission include nonroutine discharge at index (early: OR 1.877, 95% CI 1.667-2.113; late: OR 1.801, 95% CI 1.490-2.183), and circulatory system comorbidity (early: OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.082-1.538); late: OR 1.515, 95% CI 1.157-1.984). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings regarding factors associated with readmission provide insight for RP counseling and may inform postoperative care pathways. Elucidation of readmission trends may allow the identification and proactive management of patients at higher risk for readmission.

Effect of Postoperative Pain Management after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Study on Reducing Hospital Length of Stay and Medical Costs Using Japanese Nationwide Database.

Prostate cancer has a high incidence rate. Many articles reported its usefulness with the advent of robotic surgery in 2001. However, epidural analgesia is declining due to the spread of minimally invasive treatment. There have been no studies using nationwide databases on the impact of epidural analgesia use on length of hospital stay and medical costs. Therefore, we used a Japanese national inpatient database from April 2016 to March 2020. The study population included 46,166 patients. We compared a postoperative analgesia management group using epidural analgesia [Epidural Analgesia Group (EA Group): 5,354] and a group not using epidural analgesia [non-Epidural Analgesia Group (non-EA Group): 40,812]. We found significant differences among the two groups regarding the length of stay, days from surgery to discharge, and inpatient cost of surgery to discharge. Hospital length of stay and postoperative hospital stay was statistically shorter in the EA group than in the non-EA group (11.3 ± 2.8 days vs. 12.1 ± 3.1 days, p < 0.001 and 8.9 ± 2.5 days vs. 9.3 ± 2.7 days, p < 0.001), respectively, and medical costs were also significantly lower in the EA group (84,566 JPY vs. 294,277 JPY, p < 0.001). Also, the activities of daily living (ADL) assessment at discharge determined a considerably higher score in the EA group than in the non-EA groups. Epidural analgesia for postoperative pain management largely depends on each medical institution's treatment policy. However, epidural analgesia is declining due to the spread of minimally invasive treatment. Therefore, epidural analgesia should be reconsidered because it can reduce hospital stays and hospitalization costs.

Financial Toxicity After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy and Its Relation with Oncologic, Functional Outcomes.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to evaluate frequency of financial toxicity among patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data of 1,479 robot-assisted radical prostatectomy patients between 2006-2021 reporting no financial toxicity in preoperative assessments were included retrospectively. Financial toxicity was measured with financial impact of European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer-quality of life questionnaire-C30. Financial impact scores were collected preoperatively, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. RESULTS: The frequency of financial toxicity was 8.3% (122/1379; 95% CI 7.0-9.8) at any point in time throughout 2 years of follow-up. Patients reporting financial toxicity (63 [58-68]) were significantly younger than patients who had no financial toxicity (65 [61-69]; P = .001). There was no statistically significant difference between financial toxicity+ and financial toxicity- groups in terms of salvage radiotherapy (P = .8) and positive surgical margin (P = .2) rates. In functional assessments, clinically significant International Prostate Symptom Score and International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form score increase of financial toxicity+ patients (34% and 62%) were more frequent than financial toxicity- patients (23% and 47%; P = .004 and P = .002, respectively). In multivariable analysis, age at robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, International Prostate Symptom Score, International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form, and quality of life scores were associated with financial toxicity (P < .001, OR 0.95 [95% CI 0.92-0.98]; P = .015, OR 2.4 [95% CI 1.2-4.7]; P = .032, OR 1.5 [95% CI 1.2-2.5]; P = .01, OR 0.09 [95% CI 0.01-0.57], respectively). Patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy before retirement (≤65 years) had a 1.6-fold increased financial toxicity risk (P = .003, 95% CI 1.1-2.3). CONCLUSIONS: Financial toxicity after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy is low in mid-term follow-up. Patients who report urological symptoms after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy should also be evaluated for financial toxicity. Required measures against financial toxicity should be taken especially in the follow-up of younger cancer survivors.

Assessment of the Anastomosis after Radical Prostatectomy: A Review of Available Diagnostic Methods.

INTRODUCTION: After radical prostatectomy, many institutions perform cystography to exclude vesicourethral anastomotic leakage before removing a urethral catheter. We reviewed diagnostic methods to exclude leakage compared to the reference standard cystography. METHODS: We performed systematic literature review to summarize the published options and outcomes for assessment of vesicourethral anastomotic leakage after radical prostatectomy. RESULTS: Of 2,137 publications, 45 full-text manuscripts underwent full-text screening, of which 9 studies contributing 919 patients were included. Seven studies described ultrasound-guided assessment (four transrectal, two transabdominal, one transperineal). Two further studies described the use of computerized tomography. Ultrasound-guided assessment of the anastomosis after radical prostatectomy shows promising agreement with cystography. Computerized tomography-aided assessment of vesicourethral anastomosis detects more leakages; however, clinical consequences are not defined. CONCLUSION: Further studies are warranted to (1) identify men at risk of anastomotic leakage who should undergo assessment before trial without a catheter and (2) provide prospective comparisons of different ultrasound-guided approaches.

Unmet Sexual Health Needs of Patients and Female Partners Following Diagnosis and Treatment for Prostate Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer (PCa) and its treatment can have significant and pervasive sexual side effects for patients and their partners; however, partner needs are not well understood, and most resources do not incorporate partner priorities. AIM: Our objective was to perform a qualitative study to identify unmet sexual needs of patients and female partners after PCa diagnosis. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study of posts to the Inspire Us TOO Prostate Cancer Online Support and Discussion Community. Overall, 6,193 posts were identified in the Sexual Health & Intimacy forum of the community, of which 661 posts were from female authors. A random sample of 10% (n = 66) of posts from female partners and an equal number of randomly selected posts from male patients were analyzed. OUTCOMES: We assessed sexual health themes among patients and female partners. RESULTS: Multiple themes emerged that were unique to female partners of PCa survivors. These included expanding the sexual repertoire, feeling invisible, contextualizing sexual intimacy within the broader picture of survival, and addressing relationship concerns. Patients and their partners also shared common sexual health themes, including coming to terms with changes in sexual function and frustration with clinicians. Both patients and their partners use online health communities to get support and share their experiences with sexual recovery and use of sexual aids. Psychosocial treatments were infrequently mentioned, and may be particularly helpful to address partner concerns. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: A common concern for couples was not receiving sufficient information from healthcare providers regarding sexual side effects from PCa and its treatment. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: Strengths of the study include leveraging a unique data source to address an understudied topic of sexual health concerns among partners after PCa diagnosis. However, members of an online community may not be representative of all couples facing PCa. Also, this analysis is limited to female partners of patients with PCa, and further study is underway to examine the sexual health needs among gay and bisexual couples. CONCLUSION: Both patients and female partners have many unmet sexual health needs during PCa survivorship, and designing interventions to incorporate partner perspectives may improve the management of sexual side effects of PCa for couples. Li R, Wittmann D, Nelson CJ, et al. Unmet Sexual Health Needs of Patients and Female Partners Following Diagnosis and Treatment for Prostate Cancer. J Sex Med 2022;19:1797-1803.

Low Risk of Venous Thromboembolism After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Through Systemic Image Assessment: A Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The aim of the study was to evaluate the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and discuss whether a uniform prophylaxis for VTE after radical prostatectomy is also suitable for robotic surgery. On this context, we investigated the incidence and risk factors of VTE, including asymptomatic events, after RARP compared to transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TUR-BT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The participants were 209 patients with localized prostate cancer who underwent RARP, and 93 patients who underwent TUR-BT as controls. The incidence and risk factors of VTE, including deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, were systemically investigated seven days after surgery using contrast-enhanced computed tomography. RESULTS: Of the 209 RARP patients, 5.7% (12/209) patients had VTE. All events were asymptomatic and the incidence of VTE was not significantly different between the two surgeries (p=0.90). In multivariate analyses, neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) (p=0.006), D-dimer value on postoperative day 1 (p=0.001) and lymphocele formation (p=0.043) were significantly associated with VTE after RARP. CONCLUSION: The risk of VTE after RARP might not be so high and uniform prophylaxis might not be suitable for RARP because it might be the same as that after transurethral resection for bladder tumors. However, neoadjuvant ADT, high D-dimer levels after surgery and lymphocele formation should be noted as risk factors of VTE after RARP.

Frailty Assessment for Outcome Prediction of Patients With Prostate Cancer Receiving Radical Prostatectomy: A Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies.

A meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the association between frailty and postoperative complications in patients with prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science was conducted for relevant cohort studies. A random-effect model was chosen to combine the results. Five cohort studies including 171,929 patients were included. Results showed that patients with frailty had higher risk of severe postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo IV complications, risk ratio [RR]: 1.87, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.67 to 2.10, p < .001; I2 = 18%) and all-cause mortality (RR: 2.89, 95% CI: 1.86 to 4.50, p < 0.001; I2 = 18%). Subgroup analyses showed consistent results in patients receiving open and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, and also in studies with univariate and multivariate analyses. In conclusion, preoperative frailty may be a predictor of severe postoperative complications and all-cause mortality of patients with prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy.