Lived experiences of prostate cancer patients in an urban metropolis in North Central, Nigeria.

Prostate cancer (PCa) is currently the second most prevalent cancer in the world and the most common type of cancer among Nigerian men. This study explored the lived experiences of patients with PCa at the General Hospital in Ilorin, Kwara State, Nigeria. A mixed-method design was adopted. Purposive and consecutive sampling techniques were employed to recruit 50 and 10 participants for the quantitative and qualitative aspects respectively. Qualitative data was analyzed using thematic content analysis while quantitative data was analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. All participants were above the age of 50 years, 72% earned about $100 monthly while 68% were diagnosed in less than five years. Majority of the participants utilized adaptive coping styles and also found the strategies moderately helpful while living with the effects of radical prostatectomy. Participants also found the high cost of treatment severely challenging. Government and other stakeholders may need to subsidize the cost of PCa management thereby encouraging early accessibility to care, improved adherence to treatment and also reduce the economic burden of the disease on patients and their families.

Mechanisms of decision-making in preoperative assessment for older adult prostate cancer patients-A qualitative study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Little research exists which investigates the contextual factors and hidden influences that inform surgeons and surgical teams decision-making in preoperative assessment when deciding whether to or not to operate on older adult prostate cancer patients living with aging-associated functional declines and illnesses. The aim of this study is to identify and examine the underlying mechanisms that uniquely shape preoperative surgical decision-making strategies concerning older adult prostate cancer patients. METHODS: Qualitative methodologies were used that paired ethnographic field observations with semistructured interviews for data collection. An inductive thematic analysis approach was used to identify, analyze, and describe patterns in the data. RESULTS: Factors underlining surgical decision-making originated from the context of two categories: (1) clinical and surgery-specific factors; and (2) non-patient factors. Thematic subcategories included personal experiences, methods of assessment during medical encounters, anticipation of outcomes, perceptions of preoperative assessment instruments for frailty and multimorbidity, routines and workflow patterns, microcultures, and indirect observation and second-hand knowledge. CONCLUSION: Surgeon's personal experiences has a significant impact on the decision-making processes during preoperative assessments. However, non-patient factors such as institutional microcultures passively and actively influence decision-making process during preoperative assessment.

Estimating preferences for treatments in patients with localized prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Studies of patients' preferences for localized prostate cancer treatments have assessed radical prostatectomy and external radiation therapy, but none of them has evaluated brachytherapy. The aim of our study was to assess the preferences and willingness to pay of patients with localized prostate cancer who had been treated with radical prostatectomy, external radiation therapy, or brachytherapy, and their related urinary, sexual, and bowel side effects. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This was an observational, prospective cohort study with follow-up until 5 years after treatment. A total of 704 patients with low or intermediate risk localized prostate cancer were consecutively recruited from 2003 to 2005. The estimation of preferences was conducted using time trade-off, standard gamble, and willingness-to-pay methods. Side effects were measured with the Expanded Prostate Index Composite (EPIC), a prostate cancer-specific questionnaire. Tobit models were constructed to assess the impact of treatment and side effects on patients' preferences. Propensity score was applied to adjust for treatment selection bias. RESULTS: Of the 580 patients reporting preferences, 165 were treated with radical prostatectomy, 152 with external radiation therapy, and 263 with brachytherapy. Both time trade-off and standard gamble results indicated that the preferences of patients treated with brachytherapy were 0.06 utilities higher than those treated with radical prostatectomy (P=.01). Similarly, willingness-to-pay responses showed a difference of €57/month (P=.004) between these 2 treatments. Severe urinary incontinence presented an independent impact on the preferences elicited (P<.05), whereas no significant differences were found by bowel and sexual side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that urinary incontinence is the side effect with the highest impact on preferences and that brachytherapy and external radiation therapy are more valued than radical prostatectomy. These time trade-off and standard gamble preference assessments as well as the willingness-to-pay estimation could be useful to perform respectively cost-utility or cost-benefit analyses, which can guide health policy decisions.

Ethnic minorities (African American and Hispanic) males prefer prostate cryoablation as aggressive treatment of localized prostate cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Our safety net hospital offers minimally invasive, traditional open and perineal radical prostatectomies, as well as radiation therapy and medical oncological services when appropriate. Historically, only few African American and Hispanic patients elected surgical procedures due to unknown reasons. Interestingly, after initiation of the prostate cryoablation program (Whole Gland) in 2003 at Denver Health Medical Center (DHMC) we noticed a trend towards cryotherapy in these specific patient populations for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. We analyzed the profile of ethnic minority men evaluated for localized prostate cancer and evaluated the associated factors in the decision making for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 524 patients seen for prostate cancer from January 2003 to January 2012 in our safety net hospital was conducted. The treatment selected by the patient after oncologic consultation was then recorded. The health insurance status, demographic data, and personal statements of reasons for elected procedure were obtained. A multivariate logistic regression for associated factors influencing treatment decisions was then formed. Patients were categorized by using the D'Amico risk stratification criteria. RESULTS: The insurance status revealed that only 1% of African American patients had private health insurance versus 5% Hispanic and 26% of Caucasians. African American men were at higher D'Amico risk with more positive metastasis evaluation yet were less likely to undergo surgery and instead often elected for radiation therapy. Conversely, Hispanic and Caucasian men often elected cryoablation and radical prostatectomy for their treatment. Referrals for surgery were primarily Caucasian males with private health insurance. Most minority patients had indigent health coverage. Statistical analysis further revealed that age, marital status, indigent enrollment, D'Amico risk, and the option of cryoablation may influence patient's selection for surgical management of localized prostate cancer. CONCLUSION: Many factors influence treatment selection including race, age, marital status, enrollment in an indigent program, and a high D'Amico risk. The less invasive nature of cryoablation appeared to influence patients' opinion regarding surgery for the treatment of localized prostate cancer, especially in African American men.

Evaluación de la calidad de vida en pacientes con cáncer de próstata tratados mediante prostatectomía radical: estudio prospectivo y resultados a seis meses de seguimiento / Assessment of quality of life in patients with prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy: prospective study and results at six months of follow-up

El cáncer de próstata representa un grave problema de salud en el mundo occidental. Actualmente disponemos de diferentes alternativas terapéuticas para el cáncer localizado, por lo que cobra gran importancia la calidad de vida (CDV) de los pacientes al momento de ofrecerles las diferentes modalidades de tratamiento. Nuestro objetivo consistió en evaluar la calidad de vida de los pacientes con cáncer de próstata localizado antes y después de ser tratados mediante prostatectomía radical, analizando su evolución a través del tiempo.Estudio de cohorte abierta prospectivo con una duración de dos años (estudio aún no concluido). Se incluyeron un total de cuarenta pacientes sometidos a prostatectomía radical por cáncer de próstata localizado en el servicio de Urología de dos instituciones de salud. Se evaluaron parámetros de CDV (potencia sexual, continencia urinaria y defecatoria) mediante la aplicación del cuestionario UCLA-PCI previo al tratamiento, y luego de la cirugía a los 3 y 6 meses. Se utilizó T-student para la comparación de medias, estableciendo como significativo un p < 0,05. Mediante análisis multivariado se estudiaron factores protectores de recuperación precoz de las diferentes funciones. Fueron reclutados un total de cuarenta pacientes, todos con un seguimiento mínimo de seis meses. La media de edad fue de 64.9 años (rango 44-78; DE: 8.5). En la evaluación de los 3 meses, se obtuvo una caída significativa en la función urinaria (74.7 v/s 58.4; p=0.046) y sexual (55.9 v/s 25.98; p=0.001) con respecto al basal. El ámbito evaluado que presentó el mayor deterioro a los tres meses, fue la función sexual, observándose una caída promedio de un 78.2 por ciento con respecto a la evaluación inicial. De los tres ámbitos evaluados, la función urinaria (74.7 v/s 73.1; p=0.83) y defecatoria (80.1 v/s 85.8; p=0.86) muestran una recuperación significativa a los seis meses, con respecto a la medición inicial, no así, la función sexual (25.98 v/s 30,5; p=0.89)...

Prostate cancer is asignificant health problem in Western countries. Use of PSA has increased significantly the number of tumors diagnosed in early stages. Men undergo different therapeutics methods can generallyexpect excellent long-term survival, thus consideration of health related quality of life (HRQOL) after treatment is of great importance. Our objective was to evaluate HRQOL after radical prostatectomy in men with localized prostate cáncer. Prospective open cohort study with duration of two years (study ongoing). A total of 40 patients undergoing radical prostatectomy were prospectively enrolled at two institutions (Clinica Las Condes and Hospital San Borja) between august 2011 and december 2011. HRQOL parameters were evaluated (sexual potency, urinary continence and bowel function) by applying the UCLA-PCI questionnaire before treatment and after surgery at 3 and 6 months. T-student was used to compare means. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significantRESULTS: A total of forty patients were recruited with a minimum follow up of six months. The mean age was 64.9 years (range 44-78, SD: 8.5). The evaluation conducted at three months showed a significant decline in urinary function (74.7 v / s 58.4, P = 0.046) and sexual (55.9 v / s 19.2; p = 0,001) compared to baseline...

Monitoring quality of life among prostate cancer survivors: the feasibility of automated telephone assessment.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the feasibility of using automated interactive voice response calls to assess prostate cancer survivor quality of life (QOL). In light of an increasing focus on patient-centered outcomes, innovative and efficient approaches to monitor QOL among prostate cancer survivors are increasingly valuable. METHODS: Forty prostate cancer survivors less than 1 year post-treatment were enrolled at a university-based cancer center clinic from July through August 2011. We adapted the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) survey, a prostate cancer-specific QOL instrument, for use via personal telephone with interactive voice response. We compared written vs interactive voice response EPIC scores across urinary, sexual, bowel, and vitality domains. RESULTS: The median age of respondents was 63 years (range, 41-76 years) and the majority had undergone surgery (97.5%). The entire interactive voice response call was completed by 35 participants (87.5%). Over half of all interactive voice response calls were answered after 2 attempts with a median length of 11.3 minutes. On average, interactive voice response EPIC scores were slightly lower than written scores (-2.1 bowel, P = .05; -4.6 urinary incontinence, P < .01). Test-retest reliability was very high for urinary incontinence (r = .97) and sexual function domains (r = .96). Although mean scores were similar for other domains, their distributions had significant ceiling effects limiting our reliability measure interpretation. CONCLUSION: Automated interactive voice response calls are a feasible strategy for assessing prostate cancer survivor QOL. Interactive voice response could provide a low cost, sustainable, and systematic approach to measuring patient-centered outcomes, conducting comparative effectiveness research, and monitoring the quality of prostate cancer care.

Monitoring validated quality of life outcomes after prostatectomy: initial description of novel online questionnaire.

OBJECTIVES: To describe a novel, low-cost, online health-related quality of life (HRQOL) survey that allows for automated follow-up and convenient access for patients in geographically diverse locations. Clinicians and investigators have been encouraged to use validated HRQOL instruments when reporting outcomes after radical prostatectomy. METHODS: The institutional review board approved our protocol and the use of a secure web site (http://www.SurveyMonkey.com) to send patients a collection of validated postprostatectomy HRQOL instruments by electronic mail. To assess compliance with the electronic mail format, a pilot study of cross-sectional surveys was sent to patients who presented for follow-up after robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. The response data were transmitted in secure fashion in compliance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. RESULTS: After providing written informed consent, 514 patients who presented for follow-up after robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy from March 2010 to February 2011 were sent the online survey. A total of 293 patients (57%) responded, with an average age of 60 years and a median interval from surgery of 12 months. Of the respondents, 75% completed the survey within 4 days of receiving the electronic mail, with a median completion time of 15 minutes. The total survey administration costs were limited to the web site's $200 annual fee-for-service. CONCLUSIONS: An online survey can be a low-cost, efficient, and confidential modality for assessing validated HRQOL outcomes in patients who undergo treatment of localized prostate cancer. This method could be especially useful for those who cannot return for follow-up because of geographic reasons.

The dual-effects model of social control revisited: relationship satisfaction as a moderator.

The dual-effects model of social control states that receiving social control leads to better health behavior, but also enhances distress in the control recipient. Associated findings, however, are inconsistent. In this study we investigated the role of relationship satisfaction as a moderator of associations of received spousal control with health behavior and affect. In a study with five waves of assessment spanning two weeks to one year following radical prostatectomy (RP), N=109 married or cohabiting prostate-cancer patients repeatedly reported on their pelvic-floor exercise (PFE) to control postsurgery urinary incontinence and affect as primary outcomes, on received PFE-specific spousal control, relationship satisfaction, and covariates. Findings from two-level hierarchical linear models with repeated assessments nested in individuals suggested significant interactions of received spousal control with relationship satisfaction predicting patients' concurrent PFE and positive affect. Patients who were happy with their relationships seemed to benefit from spousal control regarding regular PFE postsurgery while patients less satisfied with their relationships did not. In addition, the latter reported lower levels of positive affect when receiving much spousal control. Results indicate the utility of the inclusion of relationship satisfaction as a moderator of the dual-effects model of social control.

[The assessment of therapy success after radical prostatectomy]. / Die Beurteilung des Behandlungserfolges nach Radikaler Prostatektomie.

OBJECTIVES: Patient satisfaction plays an important role in the outcome quality of treatment for localized prostate carcinoma. This paper identifies factors that impact patients' assessment of therapy success one year after surgery. METHODS: Patient assessment of therapy success was measured with the Hamburger Fragebogen zum Krankenhausaufenthalt (Lecher et al. 2002). Also, several sociodemographic, clinical and quality-of-life factors were tested for their impact on the patient assessment of therapy success. RESULTS: 25 % of patients gave a negative assessment of therapy success. Factors with the strongest impact were urinary incontinence, sexual impotence, younger age and higher risk of recidive. CONCLUSIONS: Especially the prevention of urinary continence and sexual dysfunction may lead to a better assessment of therapy. Moreover, the patients' expectations have a great impact on the assessment of therapy success.

[Psychooncology of prostate carcinoma - psychosocial distress and treatment approaches: a systematic review]. / Psychosoziale Belastungen und Behandlungsansätze: eine systematische Literaturübersicht.

OBJECTIVE: Prostate carcinoma is the most frequent tumor in men. The psychosocial distress associated with the diagnosis and the relevant treatment approaches available are summarized and critically evaluated based on the present literature. METHODS: A computer search for appropriate studies was done using previously defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The studies were evaluated for methodological quality based on the criteria of the Cochrane Collaboration. RESULTS: 47 cross-sectional and longitudinal studies of psychosocial distress and 13 controlled studies with mostly psychoeducative interventions were identified for the period from 1980 to 2007. Psychosocial distress resulted from urinary incontinence, erectile dysfunction, and the related lack of role confidence as well as problems in partnership. The intervention studies reveal their efficacy especially with respect to improved coping with disease in prostate-specific problems. Some studies also show a decrease in depressive symptoms and loss of confidence, improved communication in the partnership and improved physical and emotional well-being of the partner. DISCUSSION: Because of the broad heterogeneity of the interventions and measuring instruments used, a metaanalysis could not be performed. The results show that even low-threshold, brief interventions may lead to small to moderate effects in disease-specific problems. No intervention studies have yet been performed in Germany.

Follow up of men post-prostatectomy: who is responsible?

INTRODUCTION: Men living with prostate cancer represent a large, at-risk population deserving access to comprehensive follow-up services stemming from chronic aspects of living with the disease. Current research about the quality and accessibility of prostate cancer follow-up services is limited. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe the patient, provider, and health plan characteristics speculated to influence prostate cancer follow-up care. METHOD: A cross-sectional descriptive study of men living with prostate cancer, treated by radical prostatectomy within the past 3 to 5 years was conducted. Subjects were surveyed regarding follow-up care, type of providers visited, current health status, late-term effects, health behaviors, and health plan requirements. Data obtained analyzed associations among patient, provider, and health plan characteristics in relation to the use of post-prostatectomy follow-up services. RESULTS: Post-prostatectomy, all men participated in follow-up visits to a cancer care provider (urologist) and were monitored for recurrence by prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing. Fewer men had rectal examinations performed. For nearly half of the men, the general medical provider duplicated the PSA test, indicating a lack of coordination among providers. Almost all men had health insurance; no subjects identified barriers to care because of health plan rules or out-of-pocket expenses. Persistent late effects included urinary incontinence (60%) and erectile dysfunction (71.9%). No significant associations were found among patient, provider, and health plan characteristics to their utilization. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, men living with prostate cancer post-prostatectomy received ongoing follow-up health care, some of which was duplicated. Most experienced late adverse effects and many had other health problems. Nurses are uniquely positioned to assume a central role in promoting access to comprehensive, non- duplicative post-prostatectomy follow-up care. Additionally, nurses can provide effective counseling, advocacy, and education for men living with prostate cancer.

Understanding urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: a nursing framework.

Prostate cancer is one of the most prevalent malignancies diagnosed in North American men. Typically, men diagnosed with localized prostate cancer have two options for curative treatment: radiation therapy or radical prostatectomy (RP). Many men choose RP to remove the cancer; however, the intervention has two possible side effects that patients dread: erectile dysfunction and urinary incontinence (UI). At least 50% of men who undergo RP suffer from UI, which can lead to embarrassment, loss of a sense of control, depression, and decreased social interactions. The Human Response to Illness Model provides a framework to gain a comprehensive understanding of the physiologic, pathophysiologic, behavioral, and experiential perspectives as well as personal and environmental factors related to UI following RP. Knowledge gained from these perspectives will help nurses design strategies that facilitate coping and improve outcomes in men with UI following RP.

Health related quality of life and direct medical care cost in newly diagnosed younger men with prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: We evaluated health related quality of life (HRQOL) and the direct medical care cost (DMC) in young men receiving radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, 40 newly diagnosed patients with prostate cancer (PCa) who were younger than 65 years were matched with 40 cancer-free men. Participants completed the Medical Outcome Study Short Form and UCLA-PCa Index surveys prior to treatment, and at 3, 6, 12 and 24-month followup. Cost data were obtained from a hospital based administrative database and clinical data were obtained via structured medical chart review. Demographics and HRQOL were compared using the t, Fisher exact and chi-square tests. The Wilcoxon and log-T tests were used to compare DMC. Multivariate regression models were used to assess the incremental cost of PCa and predictors of 24-month prostate specific HRQOL. RESULTS: Patients with PCa had a mean annual DMC of 4,160 dollars for the treatment year with a mean length of stay of 3.5 days. They had 3-fold higher DMC than controls. At 12 months, generic HRQOL values were similar to baseline values. Sexual function showed trends toward improvement 6 months after surgery. Urinary function improved significantly by 6 months, although it decreased thereafter. Bowel function and bother returned to baseline values by 3 months. On multivariate regression marital status was a significant predictor of 5 domains of prostate specific HRQOL at 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with PCa reported weaker sexual function, urinary function and sexual bother at 2 years after treatment compared with their baseline values. There exists an opportunity for improving prostate specific HRQOL in men with early stage PCa.

Radical prostatectomy: men's experiences and postoperative needs.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: This study sought to explore men's experiences after radical prostatectomy and whether they perceived their preoperative teaching adequately prepared them for postoperative recovery. Tape-recorded telephone and face-to-face interviews were conducted at days 2, 7 and 21, and 3 and 12 months postdischarge. BACKGROUND: Although verbal and written instruction about postoperative expectations and care are provided routinely before radical prostatectomy, patients express concern about a lack of preparation in managing urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction. DESIGN: This qualitative descriptive study explored in-depth men's experiences during the year following their surgery. METHODS: Multiple, tape-recorded, semistructured telephone interviews were conducted with 17 participants and a single, in-depth, face-to-face interview was conducted 12 months postoperatively with a subset of five men selected for their reflective and descriptive abilities. RESULTS: Although participants received comprehensive written and verbal information preoperatively, it was not sufficient to foster their management of all postoperative sequelae. Telephone follow-up, used as a data collection strategy, was helpful in fostering adjustment after surgery and relieved anxiety caused by side effects of surgery and unanswered questions. CONCLUSIONS: Pre- and postoperative teaching needs to make allowances for the impact of stress on the recall and processing of information. Written information in itself is not adequate to answer necessary questions and provide reassurance. Follow-up telephone support is recommended as a way of fostering adjustment after surgery. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: This study shows that: (i) Written information in itself is not adequate to answer necessary questions and provide reassurance, (ii) Nurses need to be prepared, both educationally and psychologically, to observe non-verbal cues and to address questions and concerns that are rarely voiced in ways that indicate their significance to the person and (iii) Men may not speak about sexuality issues in ways that accurately reflect the extent of their worry and/or distress about erectile dysfunction.

Treatment options for localized prostate cancer: quality-adjusted life years and the effects of lead-time.

OBJECTIVES: The purposes of this study were to estimate the difference in quality-adjusted life-years between conservative management and prostatectomy or radiotherapy (RT) by clinical Gleason score (2 to 4, 5 to 6, 7, and 8 to 10) for patients aged 55 years and older with clinically localized prostate cancer and to adjust for and explore the effects of lead-time. For localized prostate cancer, it is not known whether treatment (prostatectomy or RT) results in longer quality-adjusted survival than conservative management. Observed survival benefits after treatment may be biased by the lead-time resulting from early diagnosis with prostate-specific antigen screening. METHODS: A Markov simulation was developed, and transition probabilities were derived from a review of published studies. Utility weights were measured in male volunteers older than 60 years. Estimates of disease progression during conservative management were adjusted for lead-time. Sensitivity analyses were performed on all parameters (including estimates for lead-time). RESULTS: For Gleason score 2 to 4 cancer, conservative management yielded the greatest number of quality-adjusted life-years. For Gleason score 5 to 6 cancer, any of the options appeared beneficial, depending on the estimates for disease progression. For Gleason score 7 to 10 cancer, prostatectomy and RT resulted in more quality-adjusted life-years than conservative management; with a lead-time adjustment of greater than 10 years, the outcomes with conservative management and prostatectomy were similar. The choice between prostatectomy and RT was sensitive to estimates of disease progression after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Conservative management is a reasonable option for Gleason score 2 to 4 cancer and for some patients with Gleason score 5 to 6 cancer. Prostatectomy or RT is recommended for Gleason score 7 to 10 cancer. The survival benefits after treatment were not explained by the lead-time alone.

Fear of cancer recurrence in patients undergoing definitive treatment for prostate cancer: results from CaPSURE.

PURPOSE: Contemporary cancer treatments have resulted in patients living longer but with the risk of disease recurrence. Studies suggest that fear of recurrence is a significant burden. We described fear of cancer recurrence in patients with prostate cancer undergoing treatment with radical prostatectomy (RP), radiation (XRT) or brachytherapy (BT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 519 patients (326 RP, 53 XRT, 140 BT) were identified from CaPSURE (Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor), a national longitudinal registry of men with prostate cancer. To be included in the study patients had to complete at least 1 pretreatment and 2 posttreatment health related quality of life questionnaires and have complete clinical information. Fear of cancer recurrence was assessed with a validated 5-item scale, and was described at baseline and up to 2 years after treatment. Multivariate linear regression was performed to determine significant predictors of fear of cancer recurrence. RESULTS: Men receiving XRT were older and had worse clinical disease characteristics than patients treated with RP or BT. For all groups fear of cancer recurrence was more severe before treatment and improved after treatment but did not change substantially in the 2 years thereafter. Regression revealed that only general health and mental health were important predictors of fear of cancer recurrence. No other general or disease specific health related quality of life domains or clinical characteristics contributed appreciable explanatory power. CONCLUSIONS: Fear of prostate cancer recurrence imposes a substantial burden in patients before and after treatment. Understanding the fear of cancer recurrence associated with different treatments can help physicians better counsel patients and promote psychological well-being.

Patient preferences for outcomes associated with surgical management of prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: We used utility assessment to evaluate patient preferences for current urinary and sexual function after radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We measured preferences in 209 community volunteers enrolled in a prostate cancer screening study who underwent radical prostatectomy between 1994 and 1998. We compared preferences in 3 outcome groups, namely men bothered by current urinary and sexual functioning, only bothered by current sexual functioning and not bothered by current sexual or urinary functioning. Preferences were assessed via a computer based interview using time trade-off and standard gamble methods. Current functioning was assessed via a standardized questionnaire. RESULTS: Median time trade-off and standard gamble utilities were high at 0.9 across outcome groups, indicating that men were not willing to give up many remaining life years (10% of remaining life expectancy) with current functioning to achieve ideal functioning. However, mean time trade-off and standard gamble scores significantly decreased as the burden increased in men bothered by current sexual and urinary function (0.77 and 0.82), bothered by current sexual function only (0.87 and 0.89) and not bothered by sexual or urinary function (0.92 and 0.96, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Health related quality of life was generally good in this observational study of patients treated for prostate cancer with radical prostatectomy. In addition, those bothered by urinary and/or sexual function would not be willing to trade much of the remaining life span to achieve perfect functioning. However, the perception of side effects was bothersome enough in some men to warrant appropriate patient counseling regarding the potential risks and benefits.

Prospective evaluation of the effects of prostatectomy on symptoms and quality of life.

AIMS: To evaluate prospectively urinary symptoms and quality of life before and after prostate surgery, among men who had been on a waiting list for elective transurethral prostate resection (TURP). METHODS: Face-to-face interviews with 47 men before and after prostate surgery using the urinary symptom specific American Urological Association Urinary Symptom Index (AUA-7), the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36), and questions relating to the effects of urinary symptoms on men's lives and acceptable waiting times for surgery. RESULTS: The mean AUA-7 score before surgery for all participants was 22.2 (range 5-34) and after surgery improved to a mean of 7.3 (range 1-28). Men with severe urinary symptoms before surgery experienced the greatest improvement in symptoms after surgery, compared with the mild/moderate symptom group. Significant improvements occurred in three of the eight SF-36 dimensions following surgery. Acceptable waiting times for surgery differed according to the severity of mens' urinary symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Efforts to develop methods for prioritisation of access to surgery are supported. Men with mild or moderate symptoms may reasonably delay surgery, with the expectation that, if they develop more severe symptoms, surgery will be helpful. Because of the risks as well as the benefits of prostate surgery, the use of illustrative vignettes may be useful for clinicians advising patients.

Effect of treatment on quality of life among men with clinically localized prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Quality-of-life outcomes are an important consideration for patients evaluating therapeutic options for localized prostate cancer. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to describe the effect of treatment choice on change in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) among men with clinically localized prostate cancer. RESEARCH DESIGN: This was a prospective observational study. SUBJECTS: The study subjects were 122 men with clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Forty-two subjects (34%) underwent radical prostatectomy, 51 (42%) underwent radiation therapy, and 29 (24%) were followed with expectant management. MEASURES: The University of California at Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Quality of Life Inde- and the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 were administered before and 3 and 12 months after initial treatment. The study used an analysis of covariance model adjusted for baseline differences in clinical and demographic factors. RESULTS: Men who underwent radical prostatectomy experienced significant declines in urinary and sexual function and bother that persisted at 12 months after treatment. Men treated with radiation therapy experienced smaller but significant declines in sexual function and a decline in social function. Expectant management patients did not have a significant change in disease-targeted or generic HRQOL domains. Differential rates of change in urinary and sexual function between treatment groups persisted after adjustment for differences in pretreatment clinical and demographic factors. CONCLUSIONS: Men undergoing radical prostatectomy have substantial declines in urinary and sexual function, and men undergoing radiotherapy have declines in sexual function. Men undergoing expectant management have no change in disease-specific or general HRQOL in the first year after treatment.

Beyond sexual assessment: lessons learned from couples post radical prostatectomy.

PURPOSE: To share selected experiences of advanced practice nurses (APNs) who implemented a home-based nursing protocol related to psychosexual function for couples following radical surgery for prostate cancer. DATA SOURCES: Selected research-based articles, the PLISSIT Model for sexual rehabilitation counseling, and the authors' experiences. CONCLUSIONS: Five lessons related to communicating about sexuality and intimacy were synthesized from the experience, including examining knowledge and self-awareness regularly, using a structured interview guide to facilitate the process, developing a trusting relationship with the couple, attending to verbal and nonverbal cues, and providing information about the full range of sexual expression. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Include an assessment of sexual health as an integral part of a general health assessment. Patients do not generally volunteer information about their sexual concerns unless the subject is introduced by the APN.