Dose Adjustment Associated Complications of Bone Morphogenetic Protein: A Longitudinal Assessment.

OBJECTIVE: Bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) is a growth factor that aids in osteoinduction and promotes bone fusion. There is a lack of literature regarding recombinant human BMP-2 (rhBMP-2) dosage in different spine surgeries. This study aims to investigate the trends in rhBMP-2 dosage and the associated complications in spinal arthrodesis. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted investigating spinal arthrodesis using rhBMP-2. Variables including age, procedure type, rhBMP-2 size, complications, and postoperative imaging were collected. Cases were grouped into the following surgical procedures: anterior lumbar interbody fusion/extreme lateral interbody fusion (ALIF/XLIF), posterior lumbar interbody fusion/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF/TLIF), posterolateral fusion (PLF), anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), and posterior cervical fusion (PCF). RESULTS: A total of 1209 patients who received rhBMP-2 from 2006 to 2020 were studied. Of these, 230 were categorized as ALIF/XLIF, 336 as PLIF/TLIF, 243 as PLF, 203 as ACDF, and 197 as PCF. PCF (P < 0.001), PLIF/TLIF (P < 0.001), and PLF (P < 0.001) demonstrated a significant decrease in the rhBMP-2 dose used per level, with major transitions seen in 2018, 2011, and 2013, respectively. In our sample, 129 complications following spinal arthrodesis were noted. A significant relation between rhBMP-2 size and complication rates (χ2= 73.73, P = 0.0029) was noted. rhBMP-2 dosage per level was a predictor of complication following spinal arthrodesis (odds ratio = 1.302 [1.05-1.55], P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: BMP is an effective compound in fusing adjacent spine segments. However, it carries some regional complications. We demonstrate a decreasing trend in the dose/vertebral level. A decrease rhBMP-2 dose per level correlated with a decrease in complication rates.

A large database study of hospitalization charges and follow-up re-admissions in US lumbar fusion surgeries using a cellular bone allograft (CBA) versus recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2).

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to retrospectively compare initial procedure and 12-month follow-up hospitalization charges and resource utilization (lengths of stay; LOS) for lumbar fusion surgeries using either recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) or a cellular bone allograft comprised of viable lineage-committed bone cells (V-CBA) via a large US healthcare system database. Potentially relevant re-admissions during the follow-up period were also assessed. METHODS: A total of 16,172 patients underwent lumbar fusion surgery using V-CBA or rhBMP-2, of whom 3503 (21.66%) patients had follow-up re-admission data. Initial patient, procedure, and hospital characteristics were assessed to determine confounding factors. Multivariate regression modeling compared differences in hospitalization charges (in 2018 US dollars) and LOS (in days) between the groups, as well as incidences of potentially relevant re-admissions during the 12-month follow-up period. RESULTS: The adjusted mean initial procedure and 12-month follow-up hospital charges were significantly lower in the V-CBA group versus the rhBMP-2 group ($109,061 and $108,315 versus $160,191 and $130,406, respectively; P < 0.0001 for both comparisons). This disparity remained in an ad hoc comparison of charges for initial single-level treatments only (V-CBA = $103,064, rhBMP-2 = $149,620; P < 0.0001). The adjusted mean initial LOS were significantly lower in the V-CBA group (3.77 days) versus the rhBMP-2 group (3.88 days; P < 0.0001), but significantly higher for the cumulative follow-up hospitalizations in the 12-month follow-up period (7.87 versus 7.46 days, respectively; P < 0.0001). Differences in rates of follow-up re-admissions aligned with comorbidities at the initial procedure. Subsequent lumbar fusion rates were comparable, but significantly lower for V-CBA patients who had undergone single-level treatments only, in spite of V-CBA patients having significantly higher rates of initial comorbidities that could negatively impact clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that use of V-CBA for lumbar fusion surgeries performed in the US may result in substantially lower overall hospitalization charges versus rhBMP-2, with both exhibiting similar rates of 12-month re-admissions and subsequent lumbar fusion procedures.

Cost-Utility Analysis of 1- and 2-Level Dorsal Lumbar Fusions With and Without Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenic Protein-2 at 1-Year Follow-Up.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective 1-year cost-utility analysis. OBJECTIVE: To determine the cost-effectiveness of using recombinant human bone morphogenic protein (rhBMP-2) in addition to autograft for 1- and 2-level lumbar fusions. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: rhBMP-2 has been studied extensively to identify its benefits, risks, patient outcomes, and costs relative to autograft [local bone or iliac crest bone graft (ICBG)]. This study seeks to analyze the cost-effectiveness of adding rhBMP-2 to autograft versus without rhBMP-2 in lumbar fusions. METHODS: Thirty-three patients receiving rhBMP-2 in addition to either local bone autograft or ICBG (rhBMP-2 cohort) and 42 patients receiving only local bone autograft or ICBG (control cohort) for 1- or 2-level dorsal lumbar fusion were analyzed. This included posterolateral fusion, posterior lumbar interbody fusion, and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. One-year postoperative health outcomes were assessed based on Visual Analogue Scale, Pain Disability Questionnaire, Patient Health Questionnaire, and EuroQol-5 Dimensions questionnaires. Direct medical costs were estimated using Medicare national payment amounts and indirect costs were based on patient missed work days and patient income. Postoperative 1-year cost-utility ratios and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were calculated to assess for cost-effectiveness using a threshold of $100,000/QALY gained. RESULTS: The 1-year cost-utility ratio (total cost/ΔQALY) for the control cohort was significantly lower ($143,251/QALY gained) than that of the rhBMP-2 cohort ($272,414/QALY gained) (P<0.01). At 1-year follow-up, the control group dominated the ICER compared with the rhBMP-2 group. CONCLUSIONS: Statistically significant and clinically relevant improvements (through minimum clinically important differences) were seen for both cohorts. In the ICER analysis, the control cohort dominated the rhBMP-2 group. Assuming durable per year gains in QALY, by 2 years fusion with autograft but without rhBMP-2 would be considered cost-effective ($71,625/QALY gained), whereas fusion with both autograft and rhBMP-2 would not be cost-effective ($136,207/QALY gained).

Is dibotermin alfa a cost-effective substitute for autologous iliac crest bone graft in single level lumbar interbody spine fusion?

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of dibotermin alfa compared with autologous iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) for patients undergoing single level lumbar interbody spinal fusion in a UK hospital setting. METHODS: An individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis of six randomized controlled clinical trials and two single arm trials compared dibotermin alfa on an absorbable collagen implantation matrix (ACIM) (n = 456) and ICBG (n = 244) on resource use, re-operation rates, and SF-6D (Short form 6-dimension) health utility (total N = 700). Failure-related second surgery, operating time, post-operative hospital stay, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) derived from the IPD meta-analysis were included as inputs in an economic evaluation undertaken to assess the cost-effectiveness of dibotermin alfa/ACIM versus ICBG for patients undergoing single level lumbar interbody spinal fusion. A four year time horizon and the United Kingdom (UK) National Health Service (NHS) and Personal Social Services (PSS) perspective was adopted in the base case, with sensitivity analyses performed to gauge parameter uncertainty. RESULTS: In the base case analysis, patients treated using dibotermin alfa/ACIM (12 mg pack) accrued 0.055 incremental QALYs at an incremental cost of £ 737, compared with patients treated with ICBG. This resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £ 13,523, indicating that at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £ 20,000, dibotermin alfa/ACIM is a cost-effective intervention relative to ICBG from the NHS and PSS perspective. CONCLUSIONS: In a UK hospital setting, dibotermin alfa/ACIM is a cost-effective substitute for ICBG for patients who require lumbar interbody arthrodesis.

In vivo assessment of a multicomponent and nanostructural polymeric matrix as a delivery system for antimicrobials and bone morphogenetic protein-2 in a unicortical tibial defect in goats.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the response of cortical bone to a multicomponent and nanostructural polymeric matrix as a drug delivery system for enhancing bone healing. ANIMALS: 20 healthy adult crossbred goats. PROCEDURES: A 3.5-mm-diameter unicortical defect was created in each tibia (day 0), and goats (4 goats/group) were treated as follows: not treated (control group), grafted with the matrix, grafted with antimicrobial (tigecycline and tobramycin)-impregnated matrix, grafted with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein type 2 (rhBMP-2)-impregnated matrix, or grafted with antimicrobial- and rhBMP-2-impregnated matrix. Elution kinetics of antimicrobials was monitored through plasma concentrations. Bone response was assessed with radiographic scoring (days 1 and 30) and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (days 1, 14, and 30). Goats were euthanized on day 30, and histomorphologic analysis was performed. Categorical variables were analyzed with a generalized linear model, and continuous variables were analyzed with an ANOVA. RESULTS: Plasma antimicrobial concentrations indicated continued release throughout the study. Radiography and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry did not reveal significant differences among treatments on day 30. Periosteal reactions were significantly greater surrounding bone defects grafted with rhBMP-2-impregnated matrix than those not treated or grafted with matrix or with antimicrobial-impregnated matrix; periosteal reactions were similar in bone defects grafted with rhBMP-2-impregnated matrix and antimicrobial- and rhBMP-2-impregnated matrix. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The matrix served as an antimicrobial delivery system and stimulated bone proliferation when rhBMP-2 was present. Antimicrobial and rhBMP-2 can be used concurrently, but the presence of antimicrobials may affect the performance of rhBMP-2.

Reporting of industry funded study outcome data: comparison of confidential and published data on the safety and effectiveness of rhBMP-2 for spinal fusion.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether published results of industry funded trials of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 (rhBMP-2) in spinal fusion match underlying trial data by comparing three different data sources: individual participant data, internal industry reports, and publicly available journal publications and conference abstracts. DATA COLLECTION AND SYNTHESIS: The manufacturer of rhBMP-2 products (Medtronic; Minneapolis, MN) provided complete individual participant data and internal reports for all its studies of rhMBP-2 in spinal fusion. We identified publications and conference abstracts through comprehensive literature searches. We compared outcomes provided in the individual participant data against outcomes reported in publications. For effectiveness outcomes, we compared meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials based on each of the three data sources. For adverse events, meta-analysis of the published aggregate data was not possible and we compared the number and type of adverse events reported between data sources. RESULTS: 32 publications reported outcomes from 11 of the 17 existing manufacturer sponsored studies. For individual randomised controlled trials, 56% (9/16) to 88% (15/17) of effectiveness outcomes known to have been collected were reported in the published literature. Meta-analyses of effectiveness data were almost identical for pain outcomes and similar for fusion across the three data sources. A minority of adverse event data known to have been collected were reported in the published literature. Several journal articles reported only "serious," "related," or "unanticipated" adverse events, without defining these terms. Others reported a small proportion of the collected adverse event categories. Around 23% (533/2302) of the total adverse events collected in published randomised controlled trials have been reported in the literature, with randomised controlled trials evaluating the licensed preparation (Infuse) reporting around 11% (122/1108) of collected adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: The published literature only partially represents the total data known to have been collected on the effects of rhBMP-2. This did not lead to substantially different results for meta-analysis of effectiveness outcomes. In contrast, reporting of adverse event data in trial publications was inadequate and inconsistent to the extent that any systematic review based solely on the publicly available data would not be able to properly evaluate the safety of rhBMP-2. Analysis of individual participant data enabled the most complete, detailed, and in-depth analysis and was not more resource intensive than extracting, collating, and analysing aggregate data from multiple trial publications and conference abstracts. Confidential internal reports presented considerably more adverse event data than publications, and in the absence of individual participant data access to these reports would support more accurate and reliable investigation, with less time and effort than relying on incomplete published data.

Staff report on Medtronic's influence on INFUSE clinical studies.

BACKGROUND: On June 21, 2011, the US Senate Finance Committee staff initiated an inquiry into whether Medtronic, Inc improperly influenced peer-reviewed studies of Medtronic's bone-growth product InFuse, also known as bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2). METHODS: In response to the June 21, 2011 request by Chairman Baucus and Senator Grassley, Medtronic produced more than 5000 documents pertaining to 13 studies sponsored by Medtronic where there was absolutely no reporting of adverse events associated with InFuse. Committee staff conducted a review of the documents submitted by Medtronic and other materials. FINDINGS: Staff found that Medtronic was heavily involved in drafting, editing, and shaping the content of medical journal articles authored by its physician consultants; that Medtronic paid a total of approximately $210 million to physician authors; and that a Medtronic employee recommended against publishing a complete list of adverse events possibly associated with InFuse; among other findings. CONCLUSION: The Committee's investigation discovered troubling evidence that Medtronic officials influenced the content of articles in peer-reviewed scientific publications to present InFuse in the best possible light. In order to address the problem of biased research in medical literature, drug and device manufacturers and journal editors need to implement stringent disclosure policies that detail industry funding to physician authors. Medical journals should critically examine past studies that may exhibit industry bias that harms patients and misleads physicians. A company employee involved in the drafting of a scientific article should be listed as an author.

Critical assessment of rhBMP-2 mediated bone induction: an in vitro and in vivo evaluation.

Understanding the influence of formulation and storage conditions on rhBMP-2 bioactivity is extremely important for its clinical application. Reports in the literature show that different research groups employ different parameters such as formulation conditions, storage, doses for in vivo applications etc. that makes it difficult to correlate results from different experiments. We therefore decided to rationalize these anomalies by performing a basic study on such parameters using two commercially available BMPs. Our in vitro experiments suggest that BMPs from different sources have significant differences in their bioactivity. The clinically approved rhBMP-2 (InductOs®; BMP-P) showed superior stability, compared to rhBMP-2 from R&D Systems (BMP-R) at physiological pH (determined by ALP assay). This BMP-P also showed lower binding to polypropylene Eppendorf tube. The BMP-R almost lost its bioactivity within 30 min at physiological pH and also shows more adhesion to plastic surfaces. This aggregation behavior was unequivocally ascertained by performing light scattering studies of the two BMPs, which revealed linear aggregation with time for BMP-R unlike BMP-P. The in vitro results were also reflected in the in vivo experiments, in a rat ectopic model with injectable hyaluronic acid (HA) hydrogel as BMP carrier. After 7 weeks post-implantation we observed larger bone volume with oriented collagen in the BMP-P group but a smaller bone with disoriented collagen in the BMP-R case. Our results highlight the large difference in activity between seemingly identical substances and also the importance of proper handling of such sensitive proteins.

Assessment of immunization against recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (dibotermin alpha) on reproduction and development in rabbits.

BACKGROUND: To determine if the fetus was affected by maternal antibodies to BMP-2, the antibody response and developmental effects in fetuses from does immunized against recombinant human BMP-2 were evaluated. METHODS: Female New Zealand White rabbits received four intramuscular injections (on premating days 1, 8, 22, and 43 [3 days before mating]) of saline and adjuvant (TiterMax(®) Gold [control]) or recombinant human BMP-2 (2 mg/dose) and adjuvant (treated). On GD 29, fetuses were examined, and maternal and fetal anti-BMP-2 titer levels and neutralizing activity were assessed. RESULTS: Anti-BMP-2 antibodies were detected in 17 of 18 treated does (127 of 151 fetuses), and low levels were detected in 2 of 16 control does (no fetal exposure observed). In general, levels of fetal anti-BMP-2 antibodies were similar to those in the does, and pregnancy did not boost the immune response to BMP-2. There were no effects of immunization or anti-BMP-2 antibody titer levels on embryo-fetal viability, fetal weight, or fetal external, visceral, or skeletal development. Only a small number of fetuses (n = 4) displayed detectable neutralizing anti-BMP-2 antibodies, but there were no treatment-related effects in those fetuses. CONCLUSIONS: The lack of embryo-fetal effects may be due to dosage effects of neutralizing anti-BMP-2 antibodies, timing of exposure (stage and duration) to neutralizing anti-BMP-2 antibodies, and/or redundancy of effects of the various BMPs.

Correlation of computed tomography with histology in the assessment of periprosthetic defect healing.

Computed tomography (CT) may more accurately assess the healing of grafted osteolytic lesions around acetabular components compared with plain radiographs, although clinical validation is lacking. To determine whether clinical or micro-CT imaging could assess accurately the grafted lesion compared with histology, we therefore quantified bone healing and ingrowth to determine an effective rhBMP-2 dose and ratio to allograft bone when grafted adjacent to a cementless porous-coated component. We grafted surgically created acetabular defects in canines (n = 20) before uncemented total hip arthroplasty. At 6 weeks, embedded acetabula were imaged and the CT slice images matched to histology section images. The percentage of bone in the defect and growth into the porous surface was assessed quantitatively. Low-dose rhBMP-2 with allograft (1:5 ratio) resulted in a higher percentage of defect healing (43.8%) than rhBMP-2 alone (29.2%) and a higher percentage of bone ingrowth (15.7%) than allograft bone alone (1.1%) as measured by histology. Micro-CT measurements were similar to histologic measurements of defect healing, whereas clinical CT overestimated periprosthetic bone by 38%. Neither clinical CT nor micro-CT techniques are adequate for assessing ingrowth or the bone-implant interface with metal artifacts.

RhBMP-2 versus iliac crest bone graft for lumbar spine fusion in patients over 60 years of age: a cost-utility study.

STUDY DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial. OBJECTIVE: To perform a cost-utility analysis using actual cost data from a randomized clinical trial of patients over 60 years old who underwent posterolateral fusion using either rhBMP-2/ACS or iliac crest bone graft (ICBG). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Bone morphogenetic protein has been shown to be an effective bone graft substitute for spine fusion. However, a clinical trial-based economic analysis of rhBMP-2/ACS compared with iliac crest bone graft has not been done. METHODS: Patients over 60 years old requiring decompression and posterolateral fusion were randomized to rhBMP-2/ACS (n = 50) or ICBG (n = 52). A dedicated hospital coder and research nurse tracked each patient to determine direct costs of inpatient care and all postoperative healthcare encounters up to 2 years after surgery. Preoperative and 2-year-postoperative SF-6D utility scores for each patient were determined. A decision tree was created, which included the probability of complications, need for additional treatments and revision surgery; and the costs associated with initial surgery and treatment for complications and additional treatment for continued spine symptoms; and utility scores. RESULTS: The mean total 2-year cost for care (excluding complication and additional spine treatment costs) was $34,235 in the ICBG group and $36,530 in the rhBMP-2/ACS group. For the entire group, the mean cost to treat a major complication was $10,888, the cost of revision surgery for nonunion was $46,852, and additional treatment for spine-related events was $5892. In the ICBG group, 8 patients had complications; 20 had additional interventions, 5 of whom required revision for nonunion. In the rhBMP-2/ACS group, 6 patients had complications, 10 had additional interventions, and 1 required revision for nonunion. The cost of using rhBMP-2/ACS was $39,967 with a 0.11 mean improvement in SF-6D; and for ICBG the cost was $42,286 with a mean improvement of 0.10 in SF-6D. CONCLUSION: There are more complications, increased need for additional treatment and revision surgery in patients over 60 years old receiving ICBG compared with rhBMP-2/ACS. This may account for higher costs and lower improvements in utility seen in patients receiving ICBG compared with rhBMP-2/ACS in this study population.