Cost-Effective Use of the Protein S Algorithm in Thrombophilia Testing.

BACKGROUND: One of the most complex risk factors for the laboratory assessment of thrombophilia is Protein S (PS). The testing algorithm for PS employs the plasma-based assays of free PS antigen, total PS antigen, and PS activity creating a complex diagnostic scheme that can lead to misdiagnosis if incorrectly used, and a potential waste of resources and money. CONTENT: This paper compares the recently published evidence-based algorithm from the International Society for Hemostasis and Thrombosis (ISTH) with several commonly performed nonevidence-based testing schemes, to demonstrate the efficiency of the evidence-based algorithm for diagnostic efficiency with improved patient care and increased cost savings for the laboratory. SUMMARY: Significant savings (31%-60%) can be realized when the evidence-based algorithm is used in place of other testing modalities of initial PS activity testing (31%) or testing with all 3 assays simultaneously (60%). This study utilizing the PS testing evidence-based algorithm as part of a thrombophilia evaluation demonstrates that the appropriate testing methods can be used to limit wasteful practices while achieving the maximum level of information in this time of limited resources and need for increase monetary savings.

Assessment of Hereditary Thrombophilia: Performance of Protein S (PS) Testing.

Protein S (PS) is a Vitamin K-dependent protein that functions as a cofactor for the regulation of the coagulation system. PS works in conjunction with Activated Protein C to inactivate factors V and VIII. PS circulates in plasma either complexed to the complement protein, C4b Binding Protein or unbound. The unbound (or free) component is the functional form for the regulation of the coagulation system. PS can be measured in plasma by functional activity, the free (or unbound form) or both free and bound fractions (Total PS). The test most widely used for clinical evaluations is the Free PS Antigen assay (which is the surrogate of PS anticoagulant activity) and represents the protocol described in this chapter. The Free PS Antigen assay is an immunologic assay which specifically measures the unbound fraction of PS in test plasma. Other methods for assessing PS are also available, including PS activity and total PS Antigen assays, but protocols for these assays are not provided.

Protein C and protein S assessment in hospital laboratories: which strategy and what role for DNA sequencing?

This paper presents a critical assessment of protein C (PC) and protein S (PS) functional and immunological approaches with regard to DNA sequencing in a large hospital recruitment for thrombosis exploration in more than 1700 consecutive patients. After examination of clinical status and PC and PS phenotype, a genotypic study was implemented for 17 PC-deficient and 28 PS-deficient patients (activity < 70%). Sixty-five percent of the genotyped PC-deficient patients were found to have heterozygous mutations. Among the < 70% values, decreases in PC activity without gene mutation were always slight (mean value 64 +/- 7%) while patients presenting a PC gene mutation had a mean 50 +/- 17% activity (P < 0.05). Among the eight PC mutations found, only one has previously been described. A novel mutation in the promoter region (-1522), located in the HNF-1 site and associated with the Y226H heterozygous mutation, was found in a 9-month-old girl with 4% PC activity. Determination of PS functional activity was considerably improved by contemporaneous measurement of calibration and samples in a single step. Only 50% of the genotyped PS-deficient patients demonstrated heterozygous alterations of the gene. The benefit of sequencing to identify putative causal mutations was only 39% in PS-deficient women, while it was 90% in men. Among the nine PS mutations found, six have not yet been published. In the present paper, we explain our methodological choices and diagnostic strategy.

Single and combined prothrombotic factors in patients with idiopathic venous thromboembolism: prevalence and risk assessment.

The inherited thrombophilias--deficiencies of protein C, protein S, and antithrombin III--and the prothrombotic polymorphisms factor V G1691A and factor II G20210A predispose patients toward venous thromboembolism (VTE). The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of single and combined prothrombotic factors in patients with idiopathic VTE and to estimate the associated risks. The study group consisted of 162 patients referred for work-up of thrombophilia after documented VTE. The controls were 336 consecutively admitted patients. In all subjects factor V G1691A, factor II G20210A, and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T were analyzed by specific polymerase chain reactions and restriction enzymes. Activities of antithrombin III and protein C, free protein S antigen, and lupus anticoagulant were determined in a subset of 109 patients who were not receiving oral anticoagulants. The prevalences of heterozygotes and homozygotes for factor V G1691A and factor II G20210A among patients and controls were 40.1% versus 3.9% and 18.5% versus 5.4%, respectively (P=0.0001). The prevalence of homozygotes for MTHFR C677T in patients was 22.8% and in controls, 14.3% (P=0.025). Heterozygous and homozygous factor V G1691A, factor II G20210A, and homozygous MTHFR C677T were found to be independent risk factors for VTE, with odds ratios of 16.3, 3.6, and 2.1, respectively. Two or more polymorphisms were detected in 27 of 162 patients (16.7%) and in 3 of 336 controls (0.9%). Logistic regression analysis disclosed odds ratios of 58.6 (confidence interval [CI], 22.1 to 155.2) for joint occurrence of factor V and factor II polymorphisms, of 35.0 (CI, 14.5 to 84.7) for factor V and MTHFR polymorphisms, and of 7.7 (CI, 3.0 to 19.6) for factor II and MTHFR polymorphisms. Among 109 patients in whom a complete thrombophilic work-up was performed, 74% had at least 1 underlying defect. These data indicate that in most patients referred for evaluation of thrombophilia due to idiopathic VTE, 1 or more underlying genetic predispositions were discernible. The presence of >1 of the prothrombotic polymorphisms was associated with a substantial risk of VTE.