Effects of modification of trauma bleeding management: A before and after study.

OBJECTIVE: We hypothesised that the association of tranexamic acid (TXA) administration and thromboelastometry-guided haemostatic therapy (TGHT) with implementation of Damage Control Resuscitation (DCR) reduced blood products (BP) use and massive transfusion (MT). METHODS: Retrospective comparison of 2 cohorts of trauma patients admitted in a university hospital, before (Period 1) and after implementation of DCR, TXA (first 3-hours) and TGHT (Period 2). Patients were included if they received at least 1 BP (RBC, FFP or platelet) or coagulation factor concentrates (fibrinogen or prothrombin complex) during the first 24-hours following the admission. RESULTS: 380 patients were included. Patients in Period 2 (n = 182) received less frequently a MT (8% vs. 33%, P < 0.01), significantly less BP (RBC: 2 units [1-5] vs. 6 [3-11]; FFP: 0 units [0-2] vs. 4 [2-8]) but more fibrinogen concentrates (3.0 g [1.5-4.5] vs. 0.0 g [0.0-3.0], P < 0.01). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified Period 1 as being associated with an increased risk of receiving MT (OR: 26.1, 95% CI: 9.7-70.2) and decreased survival at 28 days (OR: 2.0, 95% CI: 1.0-3.9). After propensity matching, the same results were observed but there was no difference for survival and a significant decrease for the cost of BP (2370 ± 2126 vs. 3284 ± 3812 €, P: 0.036). CONCLUSION: Following the implementation of a bundle of care including DCR, TGHT and administration of TXA, we observed a decrease to the use of blood products, need for MT and an improvement of survival.

Bypass therapy assay testing as a strategy to reduce costs for treatment of haemophilia patients with inhibitors.

Published studies suggest that bypass therapy assay testing can be used to predict treatment response and dosing requirements for haemophilia patients with inhibitors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the costs of utilizing and not utilizing bypass therapy assay testing before treating mild-to-moderate bleeding episodes on-demand in haemophilia patients with inhibitors from a US third-party payer perspective. In our exploratory decision tree model, the average patient was assumed to be an adult weighing 75 kg. Based on existing head-to-head clinical trials, the efficacy of activated prothrombin complex (aPCC) and recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) was assumed to be equivalent and based on expert opinion of the haematologist in our study it was conservatively assumed that assay testing improves the efficacy of both the bypassing agents by 10%. Probabilistic and one-way sensitivity analyses were used to determine the robustness of the results. Cost savings per bleeding episode were estimated at $6886 (95% CI = $4310-7978) for aPCC and $7647 (95% CI = $3134-10 388) for rFVIIa treatment. This translates in potential cost savings of 24.8% (95% CI = 15.5-28.8%) for aPCC use and 18.2% (95% CI = 8-24.7%) for rFVIIa use. Furthermore, if testing successfully predicts the optimum dose for concomitant therapy at the onset of bleeding, significant cost savings were observed compared with rFVIIa and aPCC therapies alone. Use of bypass therapy assay testing before treatment administration in haemophilia inhibitor patients can potentially reduce treatment costs significantly while optimizing dose and therapy response.