[Repeated in vitro fertilization failure: Abnormalities identified in the diagnostic assessment]. / Échecs répétés de fécondation in vitro : anomalies retrouvées sur le bilan diagnostique.

OBJECTIVES: Investigate the proportion of abnormalities identified on the diagnostic assessment performed after at least two previous failed IVF attempts. Discuss the real benefit of this evaluation. METHODS: Retrospective descriptive study. Between January 2008 and January 2012, 205 couples with at least two consecutive failed IVF attempts had a diagnosis evaluation which consisted in couple's karyotypes; autoimmune and haemostasis biological check-up, pelvic ultrasound-Doppler and hysteroscopy for women. RESULTS: The main biological anomalies were autoimmune for 23.9% of women: antinuclear antibodies (5.7%), antithyroid peroxidase (11.5%) and antithyroglobulin (8.3%); thrombotic with antiphospholipid antibodies for 8.2% of women (1.4% lupus anticoagulant and 6.8% anticardiolipin antibodies), and heterozygous prothrombin gene mutation for 9.5%. Karyotypes were abnormal for 2.1% of women and 0% of men. Ultrasound-Doppler appeared to be abnormal in 44.7% of cases (pulsatility index of uterine artery≥3 and/or protodiastolic notch), and diagnostic hysteroscopy was abnormal in 14.6% of cases. In order to target the real implantation failure, we compared the groups "<8 embryos transferred" versus "≥8 embryos transferred" and "pregnancy after the third or fourth IVF cycle" versus "no pregnancy", but no statistically significant difference was found. CONCLUSION: The diagnostic assessment carried out for recurrent IVF failure can detect biological, karyotypic and morphological abnormalities, in the same proportion that in previous studies. Further studies will have to be conducted to evaluate the real impact of these abnormalities in the recurrent implantation failure and the effectiveness of therapeutic care.

A new therapeutic assessment score for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients receiving hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) is an option for treating advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Because of the poor prognosis in HAIC non-responders, it is important to identify patients who may benefit from continuous HAIC treatment; however, there are currently no therapeutic assessment scores for this identification. Therefore, we aimed to establish a new therapeutic assessment score for such patients. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 90 advanced HCC patients with elevated baseline alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and/or des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin (DCP) levels and analyzed various parameters for their possible use as predictors of response and survival. AFP and DCP responses were assessed after half a course of HAIC (2 weeks); a positive-response was defined as a reduction of ≥ 20% from baseline. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis identified DCP response (odds ratio 16.03, p < 0.001) as an independent predictor of treatment response. In multivariate analysis, Child-Pugh class A (hazard ratio [HR] 1.99, p = 0.018), AFP response (HR 2.17, p = 0.007), and DCP response (HR 1.90, p = 0.030) were independent prognostic predictors. We developed an Assessment for Continuous Treatment with HAIC (ACTH) score, including the above 3 factors, which ranged from 0 to 3. Patients stratified into two groups according to this score showed significantly different prognoses (≤ 1 vs. ≥ 2 points: median survival time, 15.1 vs. 8.7 months; p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: The ACTH score may be useful in the therapeutic assessment of HCC patients receiving HAIC.

Multilocus genetic risk scores for venous thromboembolism risk assessment.

BACKGROUND: Genetics plays an important role in venous thromboembolism (VTE). Factor V Leiden (FVL or rs6025) and prothrombin gene G20210A (PT or rs1799963) are the genetic variants currently tested for VTE risk assessment. We hypothesized that primary VTE risk assessment can be improved by using genetic risk scores with more genetic markers than just FVL-rs6025 and prothrombin gene PT-rs1799963. To this end, we have designed a new genetic risk score called Thrombo inCode (TiC). METHODS AND RESULTS: TiC was evaluated in terms of discrimination (Δ of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) and reclassification (integrated discrimination improvement and net reclassification improvement). This evaluation was performed using 2 age- and sex-matched case-control populations: SANTPAU (248 cases, 249 controls) and the Marseille Thrombosis Association study (MARTHA; 477 cases, 477 controls). TiC was compared with other literature-based genetic risk scores. TiC including F5 rs6025/rs118203906/rs118203905, F2 rs1799963, F12 rs1801020, F13 rs5985, SERPINC1 rs121909548, and SERPINA10 rs2232698 plus the A1 blood group (rs8176719, rs7853989, rs8176743, rs8176750) improved the area under the curve compared with a model based only on F5-rs6025 and F2-rs1799963 in SANTPAU (0.677 versus 0.575, P<0.001) and MARTHA (0.605 versus 0.576, P=0.008). TiC showed good integrated discrimination improvement of 5.49 (P<0.001) for SANTPAU and 0.96 (P=0.045) for MARTHA. Among the genetic risk scores evaluated, the proportion of VTE risk variance explained by TiC was the highest. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that TiC greatly improves prediction of VTE risk compared with other genetic risk scores. TiC should improve prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of VTE.

Genetic screening for the predisposition to venous thromboembolism: a cost-utility analysis of clinical practice in the Italian health care system.

OBJECTIVES: In the Italian health care system, genetic tests for factor V Leiden and factor II are routinely prescribed to assess the predisposition to venous thromboembolism (VTE) of women who request oral contraception. With specific reference to two subpopulations of women already at risk (i.e., familial history or previous event of VTE), the study aimed to assess whether current screening practices in Italy are cost-effective. METHODS: Two decisional models accrued costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) annually from the perspective of the National Health Service. The two models were derived from a decision analysis exercise concerning testing practices and consequent prescribing behavior for oral contraception conducted with 250 Italian gynecologists. Health care costs were compiled on the basis of 10-year hospital discharge records and the activities of a thrombosis center. Whenever possible, input data were based on the Italian context; otherwise, the data were taken from the international literature. RESULTS: Current testing practices on women with a familial history of VTE generate an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €72,412/QALY, which is well above the acceptable threshold of cost-effectiveness of €40,000 to €50,000/QALY. In the case of women with a previous event of VTE, the most frequently used testing strategy is cost-ineffective and leads to an overall loss of QALY. CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the first attempt to conduct a cost-utility analysis of genetic screening practices for the predisposition to VTE in the Italian setting. The results indicate that there is an urgent need to better monitor the indications for which tests for factor V Leiden and factor II are prescribed.

Assessment of genetic risk factors for thromboembolic complications in adults with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome.

AIMS: Nephrotic syndrome (NS) may occur with acquired hypercoagulability, however, the fact that it is accompanied by an underlying hereditary thrombophilia, especially combined hereditary thrombophilia would lead to thrombotic events. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the contribution of genetic thrombophilia to development of thrombotic events in adult patients with NS. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Factor V Leiden (FVL), prothrombin, and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene mutation were studied in 51 newly diagnosed idiopathic NS patients and age- and gender-matched 20 healthy control subjects included in the study. Renal vein Doppler ultrasound was conducted in order to investigate the prevalence of subclinical renal vein thrombosis. RESULTS: Of 51 patients, 6 (11.8%) were established to have thromboembolic (TE) complications at the time of diagnosis (4 symptomatic, 2 subclinical), and no recurring thrombotic episode was observed. Genetic mutation was established in all patients that were found to have TE complications. Acquired hypercoagulability factors were similar in patients without and with TE complication. CONCLUSIONS: The coexistence of inherited thrombophilia in NS may facilitate thromboembolic complications. If the cause of thrombosis cannot be explained by the usual factors attributed to the occurrence of thrombosis in NS, screening for the other factors, such as FVL, MTHFR, and prothrombin gene mutation, may be beneficial.

Should factor V Leiden mutation and prothrombin gene polymorphism testing be done in women with recurrent miscarriage from North India?

PURPOSE: Role of thrombophilic factor (FV) in the etiology of recurrent miscarriages is not confirmed till date. It has been hypothesized that thrombophilic G1691A factor V Leiden (FVL), if detected well ahead in time among recurrent miscarriages may be a treatable. The role of FVL mutation in the pathogenesis of sporadic and recurrent miscarriages among North Indian women was studied to construct the frequency data in this part of the country. Further, we have evaluated the cost-benefit factor. METHODS: This is a case-control study, women with recurrent miscarriages (n = 1,000) as cases and healthy parous women (n = 500) as controls were enrolled in the study between January 2003 and January 2012. DNA was extracted from peripheral blood and analyzed for the presence of FVL mutation and prothrombin gene polymorphism (G20210A). We have carried out the meta-analysis taking into consideration 20 other world populations. RESULTS: In total, 50 (5.0 %) cases and 12 (2.4 %) controls were heterozygous for the FVL mutation. The incidence of FVL was higher in recurrent miscarriage cases as compared to the control group (OR 2.14; 95 % CI 1.12-4.05). CONCLUSION: Our results revealed the absence of FVL mutation in a homozygous state among patients and controls. Although the heterozygous mutation is almost double in cases as compared to controls, we still suggest that looking at the cost-benefit analysis this test may not be included in the battery of tests performed on recurrent miscarriages among North Indians from this part of the country.

Thrombophilia in childhood: to test or not to test.

Inherited thrombophilia is defined as a genetically determined tendency to develop venous thromboembolism. In children, inherited thrombophilia contributes to the development of pediatric thromboembolic disease. As a consequence, pediatric hematologists are increasingly requested to test thrombophilia in pediatric patients with thrombosis or asymptomatic children from thrombophilic families. This article reviews the benefits and limitations of testing for thrombophilic disorders, for example, factor V Leiden, prothrombin mutation, and deficiencies of antithrombin, protein C, or protein S in childhood.

Risk assessment for recurrent venous thrombosis.

Venous thrombosis is a common disease that frequently recurs. Recurrence can be prevented by anticoagulants, albeit at the cost of bleeding. Thus, assessment of the risk of recurrence is important to balance the risks and benefits of anticoagulation treatment. Many clinical and laboratory risk factors for recurrent venous thrombosis have been established. Nevertheless, prediction of recurrence in an individual patient remains a challenge. Detection of some laboratory markers is associated with only a moderate risk of recurrence, and the relevance of others is not known. Many patients have several risk factors and the effect of combined defects is obscure. Routine screening for these laboratory markers should therefore be abandoned. Risk assessment can be improved by measurement of global markers that encompass the effects of clotting and fibrinolytic disorders. Analysis of preliminary data suggests that risk assessment can also be refined through integration of prothrombotic coagulation changes and clinical risk factors.

Risk assessment of recurrence in patients with unprovoked deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism: the Vienna prediction model.

BACKGROUND: Predicting the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in an individual patient is often not feasible. We aimed to develop a simple risk assessment model that improves prediction of the recurrence risk. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a prospective cohort study, 929 patients with a first unprovoked VTE were followed up for a median of 43.3 months after discontinuation of anticoagulation. We excluded patients with a strong thrombophilic defect such as a natural inhibitor deficiency, the lupus anticoagulant, and homozygous or combined defects. A total of 176 patients (18.9%) had recurrent VTE. Preselected clinical and laboratory variables (age, sex, location of VTE, body mass index, factor V Leiden, prothrombin G20210A mutation, D-dimer, and in vitro thrombin generation) were analyzed in a Cox proportional hazards model, and those variables that were significantly associated with recurrence were used to compute risk scores. Male sex (hazard ratio versus female sex 1.90, 95% confidence interval 1.31 to 2.75), proximal deep vein thrombosis (hazard ratio versus distal 2.08, 95% confidence interval 1.16 to 3.74), pulmonary embolism (hazard ratio versus distal thrombosis 2.60, 95% confidence interval 1.49 to 4.53), and elevated levels of D-dimer (hazard ratio per doubling 1.27, 95% confidence interval 1.08 to 1.51) were related to a higher recurrence risk. Using these variables, we developed a nomogram that can be used to calculate risk scores and to estimate the cumulative probability of recurrence in an individual patient. The model was cross validated, and patients were assigned to different risk categories based on their risk score. Recurrence rates corresponded well with the different risk categories. CONCLUSIONS: By use of a simple scoring system, the assessment of the recurrence risk in patients with a first unprovoked VTE and without strong thrombophilic defects can be improved.

Assessment of the role of thrombin activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor in retinal vein occlusion.

PURPOSE: To determine whether elevated levels of thrombin activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor (TAFI) may contribute to thrombotic risk for patients with retinal vein occlusion (RVO) and to investigate the possible correlations between TAFI activity level and other conventional risk factors. METHODS: Ninety patients with RVO (cases), except those receiving medication affecting the study parameters, those undergoing a surgical procedure within the last week, and those with kidney and/or liver failure, were enrolled in the study. The control group included similar patients matched for age and sex. After written informed consent was obtained, parameters including TAFI activity levels, conventional risk factors, results of routine hematological examination, and factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A mutations were evaluated by analysis of blood samples obtained after an 8-hour fast. RESULTS: Although TAFI activity levels were slightly elevated in cases (190.5 +/- 43.8) compared with controls (183.9 +/- 41.8), the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.36). According to evaluation of TAFI activity in subgroups (>200%, 150-200%, and 0-150%), 36.7% with central RVO, 40.0% with branch RVO, and 30% of controls were found to have TAFI activity of >200% (P = 0.83). TAFI activity levels did not correlate with age, sex, demographics, clinical status, and hematological variables. Finally, in stepwise regression analysis, TAFIa (carboxypeptidase U) activity was not found to be an important risk factor for RVO. CONCLUSION: On the basis of these data, TAFI activity was not found to be a new risk factor for either type of RVO. However, further larger studies may better identify the exact role of TAFI in the pathogenesis of RVO.

Comparative study between the Light Cycler and the PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism in detecting factor V Leiden and factor II 20210G>A mutations.

OBJECTIVES: To test reproducibility, speed and cost of testing for factor V Leiden and FII 20210G>A in our practice. DESIGN AND METHODS: We compared conformity, reproducibility, speed and cost using the Light Cycler (LC) and PCR-RFLP. RESULTS: There was 100% conformity and reproducibility. LC was faster but 23% more expensive per sample. When equipment depreciation and patient expenses are added, LC testing becomes cheaper. CONCLUSION: In our practice, LC provides fast, reproducible and cost-effective results.

Oral contraceptives, hormone replacement therapy, thrombophilias and risk of venous thromboembolism: a systematic review. The Thrombosis: Risk and Economic Assessment of Thrombophilia Screening (TREATS) Study.

Combined oral contraceptives, oral hormone replacement therapy and thrombophilias are recognised risk factors for venous thromboembolism in women. The objective of this study was to assess the risk of thromboembolism among women with thrombophilia who are taking oral contraceptives or hormone replacement therapy, conducting a systematic review and metaanalysis. Of 201 studies identified, only nine met the inclusion criteria. Seven studies included pre-menopausal women on oral contraceptives and two studies included peri-menopausal women on hormone replacement therapy. For oral contraceptive use, significant associations of the risk of venous thromboembolism were found in women with factor V Leiden (OR 15.62; 95%CI 8.66 to 28.15); deficiencies of antithrombin (OR 12.60; 95%CI 1.37 to 115.79), protein C (OR 6.33; 95%CI 1.68 to 23.87), or protein S (OR 4.88; 95%CI 1.39 to 17.10), elevated levels of factor VIIIc (OR 8.80; 95%CI 4.13 to 18.75); and factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A (OR 7.85; 95%CI 1.65 to 37.41). For hormone replacement therapy, a significant association was found in women with factor V Leiden (OR 13.16; 95%CI 4.28 to 40.47). Although limited by the small number of studies, the findings of this study support the presence of interaction between thrombophilia and venous thromboembolism among women taking oral contraceptives. However, further studies are required to establish with greater confidence the associations of these, and other, thrombophilias with venous thromboembolism among hormone users.

Perinatal stroke in baby, prothrombotic gene in mom: does this affect maternal health insurance?

BACKGROUND: Maternal prothrombotic disorders may contribute to stroke in the fetus before and during birth. Many of the mothers of children with perinatal stroke have no previous history of pathologic thrombosis. OBJECTIVE: To determine if finding the Factor V Leiden mutation, prothrombin 20210 G-A gene defect, or methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase C677T mutation in an asymptomatic mother of a child with perinatal stroke would affect that mother's ability to obtain health insurance. METHODS: 1) The authors reviewed the literature on genetic prothrombotic risk factors and health insurance. 2) The authors surveyed the 17 largest insurance carriers in Indiana to find if diagnosing genetic prothrombotic risk factors in asymptomatic mothers of children with perinatal stroke would affect the mothers' health insurance status. RESULTS: Three articles on genetic prothrombotic risk factors and insurance were identified. Twelve of 17 insurance companies responded to our survey; three had policies on genetic testing. Most companies refused to provide clear, useful information on their policies regarding these risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: The authors are currently unable to counsel their patients' families on the long-term insurance implications of screening for genetic prothrombotic risk factors. The insurance implications of diagnosing healthy women with genetic prothrombotic risk factors need further study.

Multilaboratory testing in thrombophilia through the United Kingdom National External Quality Assessment Scheme (Blood Coagulation) Quality Assurance Program.

We describe here results from the United Kingdom National External Quality Assessment Scheme (UK NEQAS) Thrombophilia Screening Program, in which an average of 21% of 280 centers reported an incorrect diagnosis for a series of plasma samples. Three case studies are described, showing causes of error in individual laboratories, related to the source of reference plasma or reagents. Methodological bias is also described. For protein C (PC) assays 18% of centers reported PC deficiency in a patient homozygous for factor V Leiden. Studies in the NEQAS laboratory confirmed the effect of activated protein C resistance (APCR) on clot-based PC activity assays. Differences in results obtained for PS-deficient subjects with different protein S (PS) activity kits are reported; several subjects would be misdiagnosed as normal with one kit if the manufacturer's reported reference range was adopted instead of a locally determined reference range. Antithrombin (AT) assays were shown to vary in their sensitivity to different molecular defects in the antithrombin gene; 77% of centers employing human thrombin-based activity assays reported a normal AT level in a patient with antithrombin Cambridge II. Sensitivity of the APC resistance test in the absence of factor V-deficient plasma was shown to be improved through normalization of results, and errors in the genetic diagnosis of factor V Leiden and the P20210A prothrombin gene mutation are described. Errors in the diagnosis of thrombophilic defects can therefore be identified through participation in EQA programs, and following dissemination of information, improvements in diagnosis can be demonstrated.

Learning from peer assessment: the role of the external quality assurance multilaboratory thrombophilia test process.

The quality control process is a critical feature of pathology best practice. In addition to internal quality control processes applied on a test-to-test or day-to-day basis, the participation of laboratories in external quality assurance programs (QAPs) is critical to achieving ongoing test accuracy. There are several such programs operating in the international arena. With respect to thrombophilia, these include the Australia-based Royal College of Pathologists of Australia QAP, the United Kingdom-based National External Quality Assessment Service, and the International Thrombophilia External Quality Assessment Scheme, based in the Netherlands. Although there are some similarities between the programs, some diversity is also apparent. Each of the programs assess for the common markers of congenital thrombophilia, such as antithrombin, protein C, protein S, and activated protein C resistance. Testing of some acquired markers of thrombophilia, such as lupus anticoagulant, and genetic tests such as factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A mutation, are also available. This report focuses on some recent trends from these programs.

A highly reproducible and economically competitive SNP analysis of several well characterized human mutations.

During the last years several genetic markers have appeared which were extensively studied for their clinical consequences and impact. Therefore, we developed 14 new genetic tests using the TaqMan technology. The new test systems detect the alpha1-antitrypsin, ACE, apolipoprotein B-100, apolipoprotein E, factor V Leiden, prothrombin, HFE, MTHFR, COL1A1, VDR and HLA-B27 mutations. These new kits were compared to the established endonuclease restriction digestion and flow cytometry, respectively. The results showed, that the allelic discrimination assays (TaqMan method) were in 100% concordance with the formerly used digestion method. Flow cytometry revealed a lower specificity in contrast to the TaqMan PCR system. Thus, it could be demonstrated that the new TaqMan assays are robust, rapid and automated methods for high throughput applications which avoid time consuming (and therefore expensive) and difficult post-PCR steps.

An improved electronic microarray-based diagnostic assay for identification of MEFV mutations.

Recent technological advances, such as DNA chip devices that allow automated, high-throughput genotyping, promise to considerably improve the detection capability of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in clinically relevant genes. We used the NanoChip(R) Molecular Biology Workstation (Nanogen, www.nanogen.com) and recently introduced microelectronic array technology to develop a detection method for the more frequent mutations involved in familial Mediterranean fever (FMF), an autosomal recessive disease that affects several ethnic groups in the Mediterranean population, whose early diagnosis is crucial if severe complications are to be prevented. We adapted the previously described Nanogen procedures to FMF mutation analysis, introducing modifications that notably improve the technique. First, as the original procedure makes use of costly dye-tagged reporter sequences, we devised a universal reporter strategy, which was first evaluated and validated on the robust, previously established factor V Leiden and factor II (prothrombin) NanoChip diagnostic assays. FMF (MEFV), factor V (F5), and factor II (F2) genotypes identified using this improved system were totally concordant with results of other genotyping methods (denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis [DGGE], SSCP, and RFLP analysis). Second, we showed that the target sequences loaded on the NanoChip cartridges can be rehybridized several times in a highly reproducible manner, allowing sequential analysis of mutations. Thus, we devised a strategy that allows us to monitor the possible interference of additional mutations or SNPs at probe or stabilizer sequences. Finally, a comparative cost per sample analysis demonstrates that the accurate and reproducible FMF mutation detection assay we developed can be readily implemented in the clinical laboratory setting at reasonable expense.

Prevalence of thrombophilia in women with severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and cost-effectiveness of screening.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of markers of thrombophilia in patients with severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of screening for factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A mutations in women entering an IVF program. DESIGN: Case-control study and cost-effectiveness analysis. SETTING: University teaching hospital. PATIENT(S): Women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for IVF complicated by severe OHSS (group 1, n = 20), women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for IVF without development of severe OHSS (group 2, n = 40), and healthy control subjects (group 3, n = 100). INTERVENTION(S): Investigation of markers of thrombophilia. Estimate of number of IVF patients needed to detect a case of severe OHSS and thrombosis associated with thrombophilia genetic mutation was calculated from the available data. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Blood samples were analyzed for inherited (resistance to activated protein C due to the factor V Leiden mutation; prothrombin G20210A mutation; deficiencies in antithrombin, protein C, and protein S) and acquired (presence of circulating lupus anticoagulants and/or anticardiolipin antibodies; deficiencies of antithrombin and protein S; acquired protein C resistance) markers of thrombophilia. The cost of preventing one thrombotic event in a patient developing severe OHSS after IVF and having factor V Leiden or prothrombin G20210A mutations was calculated. RESULT(S): None of the OHSS patients or controls had antithrombin, protein C, or free protein S deficiencies. All of them tested negative for antiphospholipid antibodies. No patient in group 1 had the factor V Leiden or prothrombin G20210A mutations. The prothrombin G20210A mutation was detected in 1 out of 40 patients (2.5%) in group 2. Both factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A mutations were detected in two of the control subjects (2%) (group 3). The estimated cost of preventing one thrombotic event arising as a consequence of screening for factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A mutation is a minimum of 418,970 dollars and 2,430,000 dollars, respectively. CONCLUSION(S): The prevalence of thrombophilia is not increased in women with severe OHSS. Screening for V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A mutation in an IVF general population is not cost-effective.