RESUMO
The acceptance of racist practices in psychological assessment, like the use of racist stimuli in testing material, has gone unchallenged for far too long. Such practices are emblematic of the entrenched systems of structural racism and pernicious presence of anti-Black oppression within psychology and beyond. This article brings into focus one glaring example: the inclusion of a noose as an item in one of the most widely used standardized tests in neuropsychology-the Boston Naming Test. The deeply offensive nature of this item has gone publicly unaddressed in the psychological literature for decades despite over 27,000 published articles with this test as a primary keyword. Herein, we review the history of the racialized weaponization of the noose in the United States; the potential psychological harm and test performance degradation imposed by including racist stimuli in assessment materials; and the ethical and cultural competency implications of exposing examinees to racist stimuli during psychological assessments. Finally, we call out the professional complicity underlying this item's persistence in psychology, urging psychologists, test publishers, and members of editorial boards to put an end to the complicit support and take clear corrective action in response to this offense. We also charge our colleagues and community to critically review other psychological assessment measures, language, and procedures in their respective subdisciplines to make the changes that will align professional practice with the antiracist values required to undo the effects of structural racism in psychology. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
Assuntos
Testes Psicológicos/normas , Psicologia/normas , Racismo/psicologia , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Cumplicidade , Humanos , Transtornos Mentais , Estados UnidosRESUMO
The American Psychological Association (APA), under the oversight of the Board of Educational Affairs, and the Board of Professional Affairs, is responsible for the education and training of psychologists in prescriptive authority. All APA standards and guidelines are required by Association Rule 30-8.3 to be revised at least every 10 years. The standards for training psychologists in the safe and responsible practice of prescribing psychotropic medication have been recently updated (Model Education and Training Program in Psychopharmacology for Prescriptive Authority, APA, 2019). A departure from the 1996 and 2009 versions of that document is that training may now be conducted at the doctoral level; however, a postdoctoral supervised clinical fellowship can only occur after the attainment of licensure as a practicing psychologist. Two novel features of the 2019 revision are the use of a competency-based model of learning and assessment, and increased emphasis on supervised clinical experiences in physical assessment and medication management. By the time of completion of their fellowships, practicing psychologists are expected to have clinical competence in the measurement and interpretation of vital signs; neurological examination; therapeutic drug monitoring; systems of care; pharmacology; clinical pharmacology; psychopharmacological research; and finally, professional, ethical, and legal issues. The updated standards were approved as APA policy in February 2019. This article briefly reviews the revision process and highlights the updates made in the most recent version of the standards. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
Assuntos
Competência Clínica , Prescrições de Medicamentos , Psicologia/educação , Psicologia/normas , Psicofarmacologia/educação , Psicofarmacologia/normas , Humanos , Sociedades CientíficasAssuntos
Dermatologia/métodos , Prática Associada/normas , Psicologia/métodos , Pesquisa/normas , Dermatopatias/psicologia , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/psicologia , COVID-19/virologia , Depressão/etiologia , Depressão/psicologia , Dermatologia/normas , Constrangimento , Humanos , Serviços de Saúde Mental/economia , Fobia Social/etiologia , Fobia Social/psicologia , Angústia Psicológica , Psicologia/normas , Qualidade de Vida , SARS-CoV-2/genética , SARS-CoV-2/isolamento & purificação , Dermatopatias/patologia , Dermatopatias/terapiaAssuntos
Esgotamento Profissional/reabilitação , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/terapia , Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde/tendências , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Viral/terapia , Antecipação Psicológica/fisiologia , Betacoronavirus/fisiologia , Esgotamento Profissional/epidemiologia , Esgotamento Psicológico/epidemiologia , Esgotamento Psicológico/reabilitação , COVID-19 , Doença Crônica/terapia , Infecções por Coronavirus/psicologia , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Diabetes Mellitus/mortalidade , Progressão da Doença , Endocrinologia/organização & administração , Endocrinologia/normas , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde/história , História do Século XXI , Humanos , Pandemias , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/organização & administração , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/normas , Pneumonia Viral/psicologia , Psicologia/organização & administração , Psicologia/normas , Psicologia/tendências , Fatores de Risco , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
Psychology has been accused of 'psychologizing' racism. Here, we summarize the argument that Psychology routinely neglects structural racism and historical legacies of racism. We then discuss two cases-healthcare and police use of force-in which studying individual bias could benefit from incorporating a focus on structures and history. We close by echoing others who have advocated that Psychology move forward with a better integrated view of racism; in particular, we suggest a socioecological view that contextualizes individual bias within the relevant realities of historical and structural racism.
Assuntos
Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Polícia , Psicologia , Racismo , Violência , Humanos , Psicologia/normas , Racismo/psicologiaRESUMO
For several years, the public debate in psychological science has been dominated by what is referred to as the reproducibility crisis. This crisis has, inter alia, drawn attention to the need for proper control of statistical decision errors in testing psychological hypotheses. However, conventional methods of error probability control often require fairly large samples. Sequential statistical tests provide an attractive alternative: They can be applied repeatedly during the sampling process and terminate whenever there is sufficient evidence in the data for one of the hypotheses of interest. Thus, sequential tests may substantially reduce the required sample size without compromising predefined error probabilities. Herein, we discuss the most efficient sequential design, the sequential probability ratio test (SPRT), and show how it is easily implemented for a 2-sample t test using standard statistical software. We demonstrate, by means of simulations, that the SPRT not only reliably controls error probabilities but also typically requires substantially smaller samples than standard t tests and other common sequential designs. Moreover, we investigate the robustness of the SPRT against violations of its assumptions. Finally, we illustrate the sequential t test by applying it to an empirical example and provide recommendations on how psychologists can employ it in their own research to benefit from its desirable properties. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
Assuntos
Interpretação Estatística de Dados , Probabilidade , Psicologia/normas , Projetos de Pesquisa/normas , Humanos , Psicologia/métodos , Reprodutibilidade dos TestesRESUMO
Measurement-based care has important implications across multiple avenues in mental and behavioral health care, including clinical care, quality improvement, and accountability. Using measurement-based care to demonstrate that quality care is being provided within the context of cost-efficient care could strengthen the position of mental and behavioral health providers as critical members of the health care system. Yet when measurement-based care is used to assess performance of providers, and then that performance influences reimbursement, it must be done with great care and deliberation so as not to result in unintended consequences such as punishing providers. Given psychology's expertise in measurement, the American Psychological Association (APA) and its members are uniquely suited to be leaders in promoting measurement-based care to assess quality and value. In this policy analysis paper, we examine the importance of measurement-based behavioral and mental health care across a variety of public service populations. We describe the increased federal regulatory focus on promoting quality and cost efficient care, the importance of defining and measuring quality care, and introduce an important resource being developed by APA to promote provider engagement in measurement-based care and effective participation in payment reform efforts in health care. We conclude with specific recommendations for how the field can move forward with using measurement-based care to assess accountability. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
Assuntos
Atenção à Saúde , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente , Psicologia , Psicometria , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde , Sistema de Registros , Sociedades Científicas , Atenção à Saúde/economia , Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Atenção à Saúde/normas , Humanos , Psicologia/economia , Psicologia/organização & administração , Psicologia/normas , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/economia , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/organização & administração , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/normas , Sistema de Registros/normas , Sociedades Científicas/normasRESUMO
In France, publicly funded mental care services are mostly hospital-based and focused on treating severe illnesses. Mild to moderate mental disorders are typically managed by general practitioners (GP) who often lack specific training to treat these conditions. Antidepressant prescribing levels for mild to moderate conditions are inadequately high. Public reimbursement for psychotherapies provided by psychologists is generally not available. This paper presents a local experiment with a stepped-care approach for the treatment of mild to moderate mental disorders in four French départements launched in 2018. The experiment includes the introduction of a standardized assessment protocol for GPs, clear referral guidelines, and full reimbursement of visits to psychologists upon GP referral. Seemingly simple, the policy raises several issues related to the regulation, training and reimbursement of psychologists, and illustrates the need for careful preparation and workforce planning to ensure success and stakeholder support. An independent evaluation of the local experiments is planned, which provides the opportunity to fine-tune the policy before any broader rollout. The issues raised in France and the on-going debate is relevant for other countries preparing similar policies for improving mental care.
Assuntos
Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Clínicos Gerais , Transtornos Mentais/tratamento farmacológico , Psicoterapia , Encaminhamento e Consulta , França , Humanos , Reembolso de Seguro de Saúde/economia , Serviços de Saúde Mental , Psicologia/educação , Psicologia/normas , Psicoterapia/normasRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To establish feasible and practical recommendations for the management of the psychological needs of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) from the moment of diagnosis through the course of the disease. METHODS: A nominal group meeting was held with an RA expert team including rheumatologists and psychologists, at which a guided discussion addressed the most important psychological and emotional needs in RA. Based on the comments collected, and a literature review, a matrix document of recommendations for telematics discussion was prepared, as well as a Delphi survey to test agreement with these recommendations. Agreement was defined if at least 80% of participants voted ≥ 7 (from 1, totally disagree to 10, totally agree). For each recommendation, the level of evidence and grading of recommendations was established following the Oxford criteria, and the degree of agreement through the Delphi. RESULTS: Thirteen recommendations were established, addressing several key processes: (1) identification of psychological problems and needs in patients with RA, and a guideline for their management in daily practice; (2) communication with patients; (3) referral criteria to mental health professionals. CONCLUSIONS: These recommendations are intended to help health care professionals openly address the psychological aspects of patients in daily practice to follow and treat them properly.
Assuntos
Adaptação Psicológica , Artrite Reumatoide/terapia , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Emoções , Serviços de Saúde Mental/normas , Psiquiatria/normas , Psicologia/normas , Reumatologia/normas , Artrite Reumatoide/diagnóstico , Artrite Reumatoide/fisiopatologia , Artrite Reumatoide/psicologia , Consenso , Técnica Delphi , Humanos , Comunicação Interdisciplinar , Saúde Mental , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Reumatologistas/normasRESUMO
In the supervision literature, research on sexual orientation considerations often focuses on sexual minority supervisees and less often on their work with sexual minority clients. Yet both heterosexual and sexual minority supervisees serve sexual minority clients and may have different supervision needs. Twelve predoctoral interns from 12 APA-accredited counseling center internships were interviewed about how they made use of supervision for their work with a sexual minority client. The sample consisted of 6 heterosexual-identified supervisees and 6 supervisees who identified as lesbian, gay, or queer (LGQ). Data were analyzed using consensual qualitative research. All participants reported positive gains from supervision that carried over to their work with heterosexual and sexual minority clients, even when not all supervisors disclosed or discussed their own sexual orientation. Heterosexual supervisees used supervision to ensure that their heterosexuality does not interfere with an affirmative experience for their sexual minority client, whereas LGQ supervisees used supervision to explore differences in sexual identity development between themselves and their client to minimize the negative impact of overidentification. Thus, affirmative supervision may unfold with different foci depending on supervisees' sexual identity. Implications for training and supervision are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record
Assuntos
Heterossexualidade/psicologia , Internato não Médico/normas , Psicologia/normas , Psicoterapia/normas , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Minorias Sexuais e de Gênero/psicologia , Adulto , Feminino , Identidade de Gênero , Humanos , Internato não Médico/métodos , Masculino , Organização e Administração/normas , Psicologia/métodos , Psicoterapia/métodos , Comportamento Sexual/psicologiaRESUMO
The effect of socioeconomic inequalities on children's mental health remains unclear. This study aims to explore the cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between social vulnerabilities and psychosocial problems, and the association between accumulation of vulnerabilities and psychosocial problems. 5987 children aged 2-9 years from eight European countries were assessed at baseline and 2-year follow-up. Two different instruments were employed to assess children's psychosocial problems: the KINDL (Questionnaire for Measuring Health-Related Quality of Life in Children and Adolescents) was used to evaluate children's well-being and the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) was used to evaluate children's internalising problems. Vulnerable groups were defined as follows: children whose parents had minimal social networks, children from non-traditional families, children of migrant origin or children with unemployed parents. Logistic mixed-effects models were used to assess the associations between social vulnerabilities and psychosocial problems. After adjusting for classical socioeconomic and lifestyle indicators, children whose parents had minimal social networks were at greater risk of presenting internalising problems at baseline and follow-up (OR 1.53, 99% CI 1.11-2.11). The highest risk for psychosocial problems was found in children whose status changed from traditional families at T0 to non-traditional families at T1 (OR 1.60, 99% CI 1.07-2.39) and whose parents had minimal social networks at both time points (OR 1.97, 99% CI 1.26-3.08). Children with one or more vulnerabilities accumulated were at a higher risk of developing psychosocial problems at baseline and follow-up. Therefore, policy makers should implement measures to strengthen the social support for parents with a minimal social network.
Assuntos
Proteção da Criança/psicologia , Psicologia/normas , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia , Apoio Social , Populações Vulneráveis/psicologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Transversais , Europa (Continente) , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Classe Social , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
While affirmative approaches with transgender and gender nonconforming (TGNC) clients are gaining momentum within psychological practice (American Counseling Association, 2010; American Psychological Association, 2015), there is a simultaneous and pressing need to move beyond TGNC-affirmative to TGNC-liberatory approaches to more fully address how societal gender binaries influence both psychologist and client. Psychologists may use the lens of liberation psychology (Martín-Baró, 1996) to transform the ways they work with TGNC clients. Using this perspective, psychologists can reflect on their own gender journey and experiences, identify how cisgender privilege influences counseling and psychological practice, and advocate for TGNC people to be better served in the settings in which they work. Psychologists are then able to engage in social change on behalf of, and in collaboration with, TGNC people in ways that simultaneously liberate psychologists from their own gender oppression experiences. (PsycINFO Database Record
Assuntos
Saúde Mental/normas , Saúde das Minorias/normas , Psicologia/normas , Justiça Social , Pessoas Transgênero/psicologia , Feminino , Identidade de Gênero , Humanos , Masculino , Competência ProfissionalRESUMO
Family financial hardship has emerged as a burden of pediatric cancer treatment with negative implications for family well-being. As part of an extensive project to create evidence-based standards for the psychosocial care of children with cancer, we performed a literature review of pediatric cancer-associated financial hardship utilizing six databases, and identified 24 publications for incorporation into this review. Financial hardship during childhood cancer was found to affect a significant proportion of the population and to negatively impact family well-being. Existing literature supports a strong recommendation for assessment of financial hardship as a component of comprehensive psychosocial care in pediatric oncology.
Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Neoplasias/economia , Neoplasias/psicologia , Psicologia/normas , Humanos , Oncologia/economia , Oncologia/normas , Pediatria/economia , Pediatria/normas , Padrão de CuidadoAssuntos
Aquecimento Global/legislação & jurisprudência , Analgésicos Opioides/metabolismo , Astronomia , Benzilisoquinolinas/química , Benzilisoquinolinas/metabolismo , Viés , Sistemas CRISPR-Cas/genética , Diplomacia , Condutividade Elétrica , Eletrônica/instrumentação , Pesquisas com Embriões/ética , Engenharia Genética/ética , Genoma Humano/genética , Genômica , Aquecimento Global/economia , Aquecimento Global/prevenção & controle , História do Século XXI , História Antiga , Migração Humana/história , Humanos , Irã (Geográfico) , Idioma/história , Nanotubos de Carbono , Armas Nucleares/legislação & jurisprudência , Paris , Plutão , Preconceito , Psicologia/normas , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Medicina Reprodutiva/ética , Assédio Sexual/prevenção & controle , Voo Espacial/economia , Voo Espacial/tendências , Biologia Sintética/métodos , Temperatura , Leveduras/genética , Leveduras/metabolismoRESUMO
The field of psychotherapy is at an important juncture. Recent changes in the field include (a) the skeptical reception of the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual and (b) NIMH's prioritization of an alternative classification system to guide translational and intervention research. Moreover, (c) the field continues to be held accountable to governmental agencies and third-party payers to demonstrate its empirical basis. Thus, psychological research as it relates to the practice of psychotherapy is at a crossroads. In this article, we provide a brief overview of several generations of psychotherapy outcome research, including the consequences that followed in the 1980s as psychotherapy research moved toward randomized controlled trials for clinical disorders. We delineate the inherent strengths and limitations of this movement and address how the NIMH has recently responded with the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC). We then address philosophical and practical implications of the emphasis on a neuroscientific conceptualization of psychological problems. Finally, we discuss opportunities for a next generation of convergent science that incorporates, rather than replaces, psychosocial variables across stages of translational research and treatment development.
Assuntos
Transtornos Mentais/terapia , National Institute of Mental Health (U.S.)/tendências , Neuropsicologia/tendências , Psicologia/tendências , Psicoterapia/tendências , Projetos de Pesquisa/tendências , Apoio à Pesquisa como Assunto/tendências , Manual Diagnóstico e Estatístico de Transtornos Mentais , Humanos , Transtornos Mentais/diagnóstico , National Institute of Mental Health (U.S.)/economia , Neuropsicologia/economia , Neuropsicologia/métodos , Neuropsicologia/normas , Psicologia/economia , Psicologia/métodos , Psicologia/normas , Psicoterapia/economia , Psicoterapia/métodos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Projetos de Pesquisa/normas , Estados UnidosAssuntos
Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/normas , Testes Neuropsicológicos/normas , Psiquiatria/normas , Psicologia/normas , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/terapia , Inquéritos e Questionários/normas , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/psicologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Participação do Paciente/psicologia , Projetos Piloto , Estudos Prospectivos , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/psicologiaRESUMO
This article outlines the cultural and psychological effects of globalization. It looks at the impact of globalization on identity; ideas of privacy and intimacy; the way we understand and perceive psychological distress; and the development of the profession of psychology around the world. The article takes a critical perspective on globalization, seeing it as aligned with the spread of neoliberal capitalism, a tendency towards cultural homogenization, the imposition of dominant 'global north' ideas and the resultant growing inequalities in health and well-being. However, it also argues that the increased interconnectedness created by globalization allows for greater acknowledgement of our common humanity and for collective efforts to be developed to tackle what are increasingly global problems. This requires the development of more nuanced understandings of cultural differences and of indigenous psychologies.
Assuntos
Cultura , Internacionalidade , Relações Interpessoais , Psicologia/normas , Estresse Psicológico/psicologia , HumanosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The rapid progress of psychosomatic research in cardiology and also the increasing impact of psychosocial issues in the clinical daily routine have prompted the Clinical Commission of the German Heart Society (DGK) to agree to an update of the first state of the art paper on this issue which was originally released in 2008. METHODS: The circle of experts was increased, general aspects were implemented and the state of the art was updated. Particular emphasis was dedicated to coronary heart diseases (CHD), heart rhythm diseases and heart failure because to date the evidence-based clinical knowledge is most advanced in these particular areas. Differences between men and women and over the life span were considered in the recommendations as were influences of cognitive capability and the interactive and synergistic impact of classical somatic risk factors on the affective comorbidity in heart disease patients. RESULTS: A IA recommendation (recommendation grade I and evidence grade A) was given for the need to consider psychosocial risk factors in the estimation of coronary risks as etiological and prognostic risk factors. Furthermore, for the recommendation to routinely integrate psychosocial patient management into the care of heart surgery patients because in these patients, comorbid affective disorders (e.g. depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder) are highly prevalent and often have a malignant prognosis. A IB recommendation was given for the treatment of psychosocial risk factors aiming to prevent the onset of CHD, particularly if the psychosocial risk factor is harmful in itself (e.g. depression) or constrains the treatment of the somatic risk factors. Patients with acute and chronic CHD should be offered anti-depressive medication if these patients suffer from medium to severe states of depression and in this case medication with selective reuptake inhibitors should be given. In the long-term course of treatment with implanted cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) a subjective health technology assessment is warranted. In particular, the likelihood of affective comorbidities and the onset of psychological crises should be carefully considered. CONCLUSIONS: The present state of the art paper presents an update of current empirical evidence in psychocardiology. The paper provides evidence-based recommendations for the integration of psychosocial factors into cardiological practice and highlights areas of high priority. The evidence for estimating the efficiency for psychotherapeutic and psychopharmacological interventions has increased substantially since the first release of the policy document but is, however, still weak. There remains an urgent need to establish curricula for physician competence in psychodiagnosis, communication and referral to ensure that current psychocardiac knowledge is translated into the daily routine.
Assuntos
Cardiologia/normas , Doenças Cardiovasculares/complicações , Doenças Cardiovasculares/psicologia , Transtornos Mentais/complicações , Transtornos Mentais/psicologia , Psicologia/normas , Psicoterapia/normas , Doenças Cardiovasculares/terapia , Alemanha , Humanos , Transtornos Mentais/terapia , Guias de Prática Clínica como AssuntoRESUMO
This article develops a comprehensive philosophy-of-science for personality psychology that goes far beyond the scope of the lexical approaches, assessment methods, and trait concepts that currently prevail. One of the field's most important guiding scientific assumptions, the lexical hypothesis, is analysed from meta-theoretical viewpoints to reveal that it explicitly describes two sets of phenomena that must be clearly differentiated: 1) lexical repertoires and the representations that they encode and 2) the kinds of phenomena that are represented. Thus far, personality psychologists largely explored only the former, but have seriously neglected studying the latter. Meta-theoretical analyses of these different kinds of phenomena and their distinct natures, commonalities, differences, and interrelations reveal that personality psychology's focus on lexical approaches, assessment methods, and trait concepts entails a) erroneous meta-theoretical assumptions about what the phenomena being studied actually are, and thus how they can be analysed and interpreted, b) that contemporary personality psychology is largely based on everyday psychological knowledge, and c) a fundamental circularity in the scientific explanations used in trait psychology. These findings seriously challenge the widespread assumptions about the causal and universal status of the phenomena described by prominent personality models. The current state of knowledge about the lexical hypothesis is reviewed, and implications for personality psychology are discussed. Ten desiderata for future research are outlined to overcome the current paradigmatic fixations that are substantially hampering intellectual innovation and progress in the field.