Ribociclib-Induced Cutaneous Adverse Events in Metastatic HR+/HER2- Breast Cancer: Incidence, Multidisciplinary Management, and Prognostic Implication.

BACKGROUND: Ribociclib is approved for hormone receptor positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC) treatment, in combination with endocrine therapy. Hematological, hepatic, and cardiac adverse events (AEs) emerged from pivotal trials, but little is known about cutaneous adverse events (CAEs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We report data from a retrospective cohort study of all patients with HR+/HER2- ABC treated with ribociclib at Humanitas Cancer Center between June 2017 and December 2022. We recorded clinical-pathological data, the incidence, and treatment of ribociclib-related CAEs. These were evaluated according to the NCI-CTCAE v5.0 classification. Progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test was used to analyze differences between groups. RESULTS: Thirteen of 91 patients (14.3%) experienced treatment-related CAEs (mean time to the occurrence: 3.9 months). The most frequent CAEs were eczematous dermatitis (53.8%) and maculo-papular reaction (15.4%). Itch was reported by all 13 patients. The grade was G3 in 8 cases, G2 in 4, and G1 in 1. An integrated approach based on ribociclib dose modulation and dermatological interventions (oral antihistamine, moisturized cream, topical, and/or systemic steroids) could prevent ribociclib discontinuation in most patients. At a median follow-up of 20 months, the median PFS was 13 months (range, 1-66) with a better PFS curves for patients experiencing CAEs (P = .04). CONCLUSION: We mapped frequency and types of ribociclib-induced CAEs. An interdisciplinary management of CAEs incorporated into routine care may reduce the rate of drug discontinuation thus potentially contributing to better long-term outcomes.

Conversion of Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue to Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Fatigue Scores in Two Phase III Baricitinib Rheumatoid Arthritis Trials.

OBJECTIVE: The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) is validated for measuring fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, 10 of 13 FACIT-F items are identified as relevant to patients with RA. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) uses an item response theory-calibrated T score metric. The PROMIS Fatigue item bank includes the FACIT-F items, enabling score conversion. The performance of converted PROMIS Fatigue scores has not been evaluated in RA populations or clinical trials. Our objective was to assess the performance of converted PROMIS Fatigue scores in 2 RA clinical trials of baricitinib. METHODS: Crosswalk tables and pattern-scoring methods converted FACIT-F scores to PROMIS Fatigue for both the 13-item FACIT-F and the 10-item RA-optimized FACIT-F instrument, in 2 RA clinical trials evaluating baricitinib, RA-BEAM, and RA-BEACON. RA-BEAM patients had an inadequate response to methotrexate. RA-BEACON patients had an inadequate response or intolerance to ≥1 tumor necrosis factor inhibitor. Baricitinib was compared to all treatment arms via analysis of covariance on PROMIS Fatigue score conversions. RESULTS: Baseline FACIT-F-derived PROMIS Fatigue scores reflected severe fatigue across treatment groups and were similar using different scoring methods. At week 24 in both studies, baricitinib was associated with clinically meaningful improvements in PROMIS Fatigue scores. PROMIS Fatigue scores were consistent for conversion methods and for the 13-item or 10-item FACIT-F. CONCLUSION: All 4 conversion methods showed differentiation of active treatment compared with placebo from week 12, supporting the use of the PROMIS Fatigue and converting the 10-item FACIT-F to assess fatigue and demonstrate treatment benefit in RA clinical trials on a standardized metric.

Eficacia y seguridad de obinutuzumab más clorambucil en pacientes adultos mayores de 65 años con leucemia linfocítica crónica sin tratamiento sistémico previo que no son tributarios a fludarabina / Efficacy and safety of obinutuzumab plus chlorambucil in adult patients older than 65 years with chronic lymphocytic leukemia without prior systemic treatment who are not candidates for fludarabine

INTRODUCCIÓN: El presente dictamen expone la evaluación de la eficacia y seguridad de obinutuzumab más clorambucil (O + C) en comparación con rituximab más clorambucil (R + C) en pacientes adultos mayores de 65 años con leucemia linfocítica crónica (LLC) sin tratamiento sistémico previo que no son tributarios a fludarabina. La leucemia linfocítica crónica (LLC) es una neoplasia caracterizada por una acumulación progresiva de linfocitos B monoclonales en sangre periférica. Constituye la leucemia más común en adultos en los países occidentales (edad media para el diagnóstico de 70 años), y representa el 25 % al 30 % de todas las leucemias. Aproximadamente, la mediana de sobrevida global (SG) es de 10 años y la tasa de SG del 80 %. El inicio del tratamiento del paciente con LLC depende de la progresión y del estado general de salud del individuo, iniciándose terapia bajo criterios específicos. El Petitorio Farmacológico de EsSalud dispone de fludarabina, clorambucil y rituximab para el tratamiento sistémico de primera línea de los pacientes mayores de 65 años con LLC que cuentan con indicación de inicio de tratamiento sistémico. No obstante, fludarabina cuenta con contraindicaciones de uso en su inserto, entre los que se listan: la hipersensibilidad al principio activo o excipientes, enfermedad renal crónica avanzada, anemia hemolítica descompensada, y la lactancia. En ese sentido, en los pacientes que no son tributarios al tratamiento con fludarabina, en EsSalud se opta por el uso de rituximab (R) asociado a clorambucil (C) (R + C). No obstante, los especialistas han sugerido la evaluación de uso de obinutuzumab (O) asociado a clorambucil (O + C), bajo la hipótesis de que éste tendría un mejor perfil de eficacia y seguridad que (R + C), como tratamiento sistémico de primera línea en la población de pacientes mayores de 65 años con LLC que no son tributarios de fludarabina. METODOLOGÍA: Se realizó una búsqueda sistemática de literatura con el objetivo de identificar evidencia científica sobre la eficacia y seguridad de (O + C), en comparación con (R + C), en pacientes adultos mayores de 65 años con LLC sin tratamiento sistémico previo que no son tributarios a fludarabina. La búsqueda se inició revisando la información sobre el uso del medicamento de acuerdo con entidades reguladoras como FDA, EMA, y DIGEMID en el Perú. Se realizó tanto una búsqueda sistemática en las principales bases de datos, tales como MEDLINE vía PubMed y en Cochrane Library. Asimismo, se realizó una búsqueda manual en las páginas web de grupos dedicados a la investigación y educación en salud que elaboran GPC y ETS: National Institute for Health and CareExcellence (NICE), Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH), Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC), Haute Authorité de Santé (HAS), Institute for Quality and Efficiency in HealthCare (IQWiG), Institute for Clinical and EconomicReview (ICER), la Base Regional de Informes de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud de las Américas (BRISA), la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS), el Ministerio de Salud del Perú (MINSA) y el Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación (IETSI). Además, se realizó una búsqueda de las GPC de las principales sociedades o instituciones especializadas en cáncer, tales como el Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas (INEN) del Perú, National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), la American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), American Society of Hematology (ASH), y The European Hematology Association (EHA). Adicionalmente, se buscaron ensayos clínicos en desarrollo o que no hayan sido publicados aún en la página web www.clinicaltrials.gov que contengan estudios acerca de la tecnología evaluada y así disminuir el sesgo de publicación. Finalmente, se consideró extraer información con una estrategia de "bola de nieve" mediante la revisión de las listas de referencias de las revisiones sistemáticas, estudios primarios y revisiones narrativas seleccionadas que sean relevantes para responder a la pregunta PICO del presente dictamen preliminar. RESULTADOS: En la presente sinopsis se describe la evidencia disponible según el tipo de publicación, siguiendo lo indicado en los criterios de elegibilidad. CONCLUSIONES: En el presente documento, se evaluó la evidencia científica disponible hasta la actualidad sobre la eficacia y seguridad de (O + C), en comparación con (R + C), en pacientes adultos mayores de 65 años con LLC sin tratamiento sistémico previo que no son tributarios a fludarabina. La evidencia científica identificada para la presente evaluación corresponde a dos GPC (NCCN y ESMO), dos ETS (NICE y pCODR) y un ECA de fase 3 denominado CLL11. Los panelistas de las GPC de NCCN y ESMO recomiendan, en general, el uso de (O + C) y (R + C) como alternativas terapéuticas para los pacientes adultos mayores de 65 años con LLC sin tratamiento sistémico previo, sin las mutaciones del(17p) o TP53, con una alta calidad de evidencia. El panel de la GPC de NCCN establece como tratamiento de preferencia el uso de (O + C). Ambos paneles basaron sus recomendaciones en los beneficios que a su criterio se habría evidenciado con (O + C) y (R + C) en el desenlace de SLP en el ECA CLL11. Los comités que elaboraron las ETS de NICE y pCODR recomendaron el empleo de (O + C) para pacientes con LLC sin tratamiento sistémico previo que no pueden recibir terapias basadas en fludarabina. Ambas ETS basaron sus recomendaciones en los beneficios que a su criterio se observó en el desenlace de SLP en el ECA CLL11. Además, NICE señaló que los análisis económicos mostraron que (O + C) era un tratamiento costo-efectivo en comparación con (R + C) para el sistema de salud inglés. Por otro lado, el comité de pCODR argumentó que el esquema (O + C), comparado con (R + C), no ofrecía beneficio adicional en la SG y calidad de vida; pero sí observó diferencias favorables al compararse con (C) en monoterapia. Estos escenarios deben ser interpretados tomando en cuenta las diferencias entre los sistemas de salud inglés y canadiense con el sistema de salud peruano al cual pertenece EsSalud, por tratarse de diferentes contextos económicos y sanitarios. Las recomendaciones de las GPC y ETS incluidas en este dictamen se apoyan en los resultados del ECA CLL11; el cual es un ensayo clínico fase 3, multicéntrico, de etiqueta abierta cuyo objetivo fue comparar la eficacia y seguridad de (O + C) con los esquemas de (R + C) y (C) en monoterapia en pacientes adultos con LLC sin tratamiento sistémico previo. La población de interés de este ECA es más amplia que la planteada en la pregunta PICO del presente dictamen preliminar; por lo tanto, sus resultados deben tomarse como evidencia indirecta. Se desconoce qué proporción de pacientes del ECA CLL11 corresponde a la población de interés del presente dictamen. Los resultados disponibles a la fecha muestran que, luego de una mediana de seguimiento de 59.4 meses, la SG26 y la calidad de vida de los esquemas (R + C) y (O + C) eran similares. Sin embargo, el análisis de los EA mostró que (O + C) tiene un perfil de seguridad desfavorable en comparación con (R + C), dado que presentó una mayor proporción de EA totales, EA de grado 3 a 5, y EA serios. El diseño de etiqueta abierta del ECA CLL11 introduce riesgo de sesgo de realización y de detección en los desenlaces de eficacia y seguridad. Además, la alta proporción de uso de terapias subsecuentes en los grupos (O + C) y (R + C) -las cuales quedaron a criterio del investigador- aumenta la incertidumbre sobre la existencia de verdaderas diferencias entre los grupos de tratamiento en evaluación. Por último, cabe incidir en el hecho del alto riesgo de error del tipo I en los análisis del ECA CLL11, al evidenciarse múltiples comparaciones estadísticas para el desenlace de interés del presente dictamen (SG), para el cual no se llevaron a cabo procedimientos de ajuste por multiplicidad. De este modo, la evidencia disponible a la fecha, sugiere que el balance riesgo-beneficio sería desfavorable con (O + C), en comparación con (R + C), en la población de interés del presente dictamen preliminar. Esto porque los resultados del ECA CLL11 no han mostrado que (O + C) ofrezca un beneficio adicional, en comparación con (R + C), respecto a los desenlaces de eficacia de SG y calidad de vida, en la población total del estudio. Mientras que, los análisis de los EA mostraron que (O + C) tendría un peor perfil de seguridad que (R + C), en la población total del estudio. En se sentido, no es posible sustentar técnicamente una recomendación favorable para (O + C) en la población de interés del presente dictamen preliminar. Además, se debe tener en cuenta que las GPC también recomiendan el uso de esquemas basados en (R + C) como alternativas terapéuticas para una población similar a la población de interés del presente dictamen, estando estos medicamentos actualmente disponibles en la institución. Por lo expuesto, el IETSI no aprueba el uso de (O + C) en pacientes adultos mayores de 65 años con LCC sin tratamiento sistémico previo que no son tributarios a fludarabina.

Critical Assessment of Pharmacokinetic Drug-Drug Interaction Potential of Tofacitinib, Baricitinib and Upadacitinib, the Three Approved Janus Kinase Inhibitors for Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment.

The introduction of novel, small-molecule Janus kinase inhibitors namely tofacitinib, baricitinib and upadacitinib has provided an alternative treatment option for patients with rheumatoid arthritis outside of traditional drugs and expensive biologics. This review aimed to critically assess the drug-drug interaction potential of tofacitinib, baricitinib and upadacitinib and provide a balanced perspective for choosing the most appropriate Janus kinase inhibitor based on the needs of patients with rheumatoid arthritis including co-medications and renal/hepatic impairment status. Based on the critical assessment, all three approved Janus kinase inhibitors generally provide a favourable opportunity for co-prescription with a plethora of drugs. While cytochrome P450 3A4-related inhibition or induction altered the exposures (area under the curve) of tofacitinib and upadacitinib, it did not impact the exposure of baricitinib. Transporter drug-drug interaction studies revealed that the disposition of baricitinib was altered with certain transporter inhibitors as compared with either tofacitinib or upadacitinib. Adjustment of tofacitinib or baricitinib dosages but not that of upadacitinib is required with the progression of renal impairment from a mild to a severe condition. While the dosage of tofacitinib needs to be adjusted for patients with moderate hepatic impairment status, it is not the case for either baricitinib or upadacitinib. Assessment of the drug-drug interaction potential suggests that tofacitinib, baricitinib and upadacitinib generally show a favourable disposition with no perpetrator activity; however, as victim drugs, they show subtle pharmacokinetic differences that may be considered during polypharmacy. Moreover, careful choice of the three drugs could be made in patients with rheumatoid arthritis with varying degrees of renal/hepatic impairments.

Pathological assessment of gastrointestinal biopsies from patients with idelalisib-associated diarrhea and colitis.

AIM: Idelalisib (IDELA) treatment is associated with diarrhea/colitis (incidence of ∼15% grade ≥3). We performed a retrospective analysis of gastrointestinal biopsies from 29 patients treated with IDELA across nine clinical trials. METHODS: A central core laboratory performed histopathologic review, immunohistochemistry, and droplet digital PCR viral studies. These results were correlated with tissue immune profiling data and morphologic features per modified Geboes score. RESULTS: Out of 29 eligible patients with abdominal pain or diarrhea, 24 (82.8%) had reported adverse event terms of diarrhea and/or colitis. Infectious pathogens were detected in 9/29 samples. Most biopsies presented with mixed/inflammatory infiltrates and contained increased numbers of FOXP3+ cells versus normal controls. CONCLUSION: This study revealed evidence of T-cell dysregulation and a substantial infectious component in association with IDELA-related diarrhea/colitis.

Incidence and management of toxicity associated with ibrutinib and idelalisib: a practical approach.

The use of novel B-cell receptor signaling inhibitors results in high response rates and long progression-free survival in patients with indolent B-cell malignancies, such as chronic lymphocytic leukemia, follicular lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma and Waldenström macroglobulinemia. Ibrutinib, the first-in-class inhibitor of Bruton tyrosine kinase, and idelalisib, the first-in-class inhibitor of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase δ, have recently been approved for the treatment of several indolent B-cell malignancies. These drugs are especially being used for previously unmet needs, i.e., for patients with relapsed or refractory disease, high-risk cytogenetic or molecular abnormalities, or with comorbidities. Treatment with ibrutinib and idelalisib is generally well tolerated, even by elderly patients. However, the use of these drugs may come with toxicities that are distinct from the side effects of immunochemotherapy. In this review we discuss the most commonly reported and/or most clinically relevant adverse events associated with these B-cell receptor inhibitors, with special emphasis on recommendations for their management.

Regadenoson versus Dipyridamole: A Comparison of the Frequency of Adverse Events in Patients Undergoing Myocardial Perfusion Imaging.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the frequency of adverse events in patients undergoing myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) with either regadenoson or dipyridamole. DESIGN: Single-center, retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Large community teaching hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 568 adults who underwent single-photon emission tomography MPI with either regadenoson (284 patients) or dipyridamole (284 patients) as a vasodilator agent, following an institution conversion from regadenoson to dipyridamole in the MPI protocol on July 15, 2013, for cost-saving purposes. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Data were collected from the patients' electronic medical records. The primary endpoint was the composite occurrence of any documented adverse event in each group. Secondary endpoints were individual components of the primary endpoint, reason for termination of the MPI examination (protocol completion or premature end due to an adverse event), use of an interventional agent to an treat adverse event, and cost-related outcomes. A higher proportion of patients in the regadenoson group experienced an adverse event than those who received dipyridamole (84.9% vs 56.7%, p<0.0001). None of the patients in either group required early MPI study termination due to an adverse event. No significant differences were noted between groups regarding use of aminophylline or other interventions to treat adverse events. The overall drug cost savings in the postconversion dipyridamole group was $51,526. CONCLUSION: Dipyridamole was associated with fewer adverse events than regadenoson in patients undergoing MPI. Dipyridamole offers a safe and cost-effective alternative to regadenoson for cardiac imaging studies.

Impact of ibrutinib and idelalisib on the pharmaceutical cost of treating chronic lymphocytic leukemia at the individual and societal levels.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of approval of ibrutinib and idelalisib on pharmaceutical costs in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) at the societal level and assess individual out-of-pocket costs under Medicare Part D. METHODS: Average wholesale price of commonly used CLL treatment regimens was ascertained from national registries. Using the population of Olmsted County, Minnesota, we identified the proportion of patients with newly diagnosed CLL who experience progression to the point of requiring treatment. Using these data, total pharmaceutical cost over a 10-year period after diagnosis was estimated for a hypothetic cohort of 100 newly diagnosed patients under three scenarios: before approval of ibrutinib and idelalisib (historical scenario), after approval of ibrutinib and idelalisib as salvage therapy (current scenarios A and B), and assuming use of ibrutinib as first-line treatment (potential future scenario). RESULTS: Estimated 10-year pharmaceutical costs for 100 newly diagnosed patients were as follows: $4,565,929 (approximately $45,659 per newly diagnosed patient and $157,446 per treated patient) for the historical scenario, $7,794,843 (approximately $77,948 per newly diagnosed patient and $268,788 per treated patient) for current scenario A, $6,309,162 (approximately $63,092 per newly diagnosed patient and $217,557 per treated patient) for current scenario B, and $16,414,055 (approximately $164,141 per newly diagnosed patient and $566,002 per treated patient) for the potential future scenario. Total out-of-pocket cost for 100 patients with newly diagnosed CLL under Medicare Part D increased from $9,426 under the historical scenario (approximately $325 per treated patient) to $363,830 and $255,051 under current scenarios A and B (approximately $8,800 to $12,500 per treated patient) and to $1,031,367 (approximately $35,564 per treated patient) under the future scenario. CONCLUSION: Although ibrutinib and idelalisib are profound treatment advances, they will dramatically increase individual out-of-pocket and societal costs of caring for patients with CLL. These cost considerations may undermine the potential promise of these agents by limiting access and reducing adherence.

Sildenafil and ventriculo-arterial coupling in Fontan-palliated patients: a noninvasive echocardiographic assessment.

The fundamental role of pulmonary vascular resistance in the Fontan circulation is obvious. Medications decreasing this resistance may have an impact on the fate of this population. Hence, we assessed noninvasively the effect of oral sildenafil on the ventriculo-arterial coupling in patients with Fontan circulation. In a single-center, prospective case series study, 23 patients with fenestrated extracardiac total cavopulmonary connection age 12-31 years were enrolled in this study. Clinical characteristics and echocardiographic examination were performed before and after a 1 week course of sildenafil at 0.5 mg/kg every 8 h. Sildenafil had no effect on heart rate and blood pressure. However, oxygen saturation was significantly increased with sildenafil (87.6 ± 4.3 vs. 90.1 ± 3.6; P < 0.0001). The calculated noninvasive ventricular end-systolic elastance (Ees) was greater after sildenafil compared with the pre-sildenafil values (1.59 ± 0.17 vs. 1.72 ± 0.27 mm Hg/ml; P = 0.001). Moreover, significant decreases in arterial elastance (Ea) (1.62 ± 0.53 vs. 1.36 ± 0.43 mm Hg/ml; P < 0.0001), ventricular end-diastolic elastance (Eed) (0.05 ± 0.021 vs. 0.04 ± 0.013; P = 0.002), and, finally, ventriculo-arterial coupling index (0.99 ± 0.26 vs. 0.76 ± 0.15; P < 0.0001) were found after sildenafil administration. The intolerable side effects that led to stopping the sildenafil occurred only in one (4 %) patient. Sildenafil has increased ventricular systolic elastance and improved ventriculo-arterial coupling in patients palliated with Fontan circulation. Short-term sildenafil was well tolerated in most of the patients with only minor side effects.

Internet-ordered viagra (sildenafil citrate) is rarely genuine.

INTRODUCTION: Counterfeit medication is a growing problem. This study assessed the requirement for prescription, cost, origin, and content of medications sold via the Internet and purporting to be the phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor Viagra (sildenafil citrate). METHODS: Pfizer monitored top search results for the query "buy Viagra" on the two leading Internet search engines in March 2011. Orders were placed from 22 unique Web sites claiming to sell Viagra manufactured by Pfizer. Tablets received were assessed for chemical composition. RESULTS: No Web site examined required a prescription for purchase or a health screening survey; 90% offered illegal "generic Viagra." Cost per tablet ranged from $3.28-$33.00. Shipment origins of purchases were Hong Kong (N = 11), the United States (N = 6), and the United Kingdom (N = 2) as well as Canada, China, and India (N = 1 each). Notably, the four Internet pharmacies claiming to be Canadian did not ship medication from a Canadian address. Of 22 sample tablets examined, 17 (77%) were counterfeit, 4 (18%) were authentic, and 1 (5%) was an illegal generic. Counterfeit tablets were analyzed for sildenafil citrate, the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) of Viagra, and contents varied between 30% and 50% of the label claim. Counterfeits lacked product information leaflets, including appropriate safety warnings, and genuine Viagra formulations. CONCLUSION: Internet sites claiming to sell authentic Viagra shipped counterfeit medication 77% of the time; counterfeits usually came from non-U.S. addresses and had 30% to 50% of the labeled API claim. Caution is warranted when purchasing Viagra via the Internet.

Comparison of fasting bioavailability among 100-mg commercial, 100-mg generic, and 50-mg chewable generic sildenafil tablets in healthy male Mexican volunteers: a single-dose, 3-period, crossover study.

BACKGROUND: Sildenafil citrate (SIL) was the first oral drug registered in Mexico for the treatment of erectile dysfunction. However, succinct pharmacokinetic data are available in the Mexican population. OBJECTIVE: The goals of the present work were: (1) to design a specific method to quantify SIL plasma levels by using UPLC-MS/MS; (2) to compare oral SIL bioavailability in Mexican men with pharmacokinetic data in other populations; (3) to fulfill local regulatory requests; and (4) to describe the relative tolerability of a new 50-mg chewable tablet. METHODS: This was a randomized, single-dose, 3-period, 6-sequence crossover study in healthy male volunteers. In each period, subjects received single oral doses of 100 mg of sildenafil (1 commercial [reference(⁎)], 1 generic [test 1(†)], or 2 chewable generic tablets [test 2(‡)]), with a 4-day washout period between each dose. Serial blood samples were collected for up to 24 hours. SIL was measured in heparinized plasma by using a validated UPLC-MS/MS method. Pharmacokinetic parameters included C(max), T(max), AUC(0-24), and AUC(0-∞). Bioequivalence was established if 90% CIs for mean test:reference ratios of log-transformed C(max) and AUC fell within the range of 0.80 to 1.25. Tolerability was assessed on the basis of a clinical interview with the subject and monitoring of vital signs. RESULTS: Demographic data showed a homogeneous population. Validation of analytical method proved to be linear within the range of 1 to 1000 ng/mL, with selectivity, accuracy, and precision. 90% CIs for test 1:reference ratios were 86.52 to 113.56, 94.75 to 108.84, and 94.97 to 108.82 for the logarithm parameters C(max), AUC(0-24), and AUC(0-∞), respectively. The 90% CIs for the test 2:reference ratios were 82.14 to 107.24, 98.26 to 112.56, and 99.19 to 113.34 for C(max), AUC(0-24), and AUC(0-∞). Regarding relative tolerability, slight cephalea was the most common adverse effect. CONCLUSIONS: The developed analytical method was validated in compliance with local requirements and was useful for sildenafil measurement. This single-dose study under fasting conditions suggests that both test products met the Mexican regulatory criteria for assuming bioequivalence in these healthy, male Mexican volunteers. The clinical data suggest that the chewable tablets were well tolerated by volunteers.

Linagliptin: the newest dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor for type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors are some of the newest medications in our armamentarium for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Through inhibition of the DPP-4 enzyme, these agents increase the amount of circulating incretin hormones, leading to an increase in insulin release and a suppression of glucagon secretion. Linagliptin is the third DPP-4 inhibitor approved by the Food and Drug Administration in the United States. It has been studied as monotherapy and as an adjunctive therapy to other oral agents in a dual or triple combination regimen. Linagliptin lowers glycosylated hemoglobin by about 0.4% when used as monotherapy and by about 0.5% to 1.1% when used in combination with other oral antihyperglycemic agents. Since linagliptin is mostly eliminated via the enterohepatic system (80%) and not to a significant extent through renal excretion, dosage adjustment is not necessary in patients with renal impairment. Linagliptin also has a favorable safety profile; nasopharyngitis is one of the more common observed side effects. Given its encouraging safety and efficacy profile, linagliptin is a good alternative to the other 2 agents in this class, especially for patients with renal impairment. This article provides a review of the pharmacologic and pharmacokinetic properties of linagliptin. The differences among the 3 available DPP-4 inhibitors will also be examined.

An assessment of the efficacy and safety of sildenafil administered to patients with erectile dysfunction referred for posterior urethroplasty: a single-center experience.

INTRODUCTION: Urethral trauma is often associated with erectile dysfunction (ED). Reconstructive surgery is complex and may impact negatively on sexual function. AIM: The aim of this article is to investigate ED in patients with pelvic fracture urethral distraction defects (PFUDD) who underwent urethroplasty, and efficacy of treatment with sildenafil citrate. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A total of 41 patients with urethral stricture who suffered from PFUDD were assessed to exclude systemic diseases that may cause ED, such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, heart disease, and chronic liver disease. The International Index of Erectile Function-5 was used as an evaluation tool. Assessments were made at three time points: the time of admission, two weeks after urethroplasty, and 3 months post-treatment with sildenafil. METHODS: Pharmacopenile duplex ultrasonography was used to examine blood flow of the cavernosum in order to distinguish arterial ED, venous ED, and nonvascular ED. All patients were treated with oral sildenafil, 100 mg once daily, three times a week, for 3 months. RESULTS: The incidence of ED following injury was 95.12%. There were no significant changes in scores following surgery. However, sildenafil had a success rate of approximately 81%, which appeared to be independent of age. Drug treatment seemed most effective for those with less severe ED at the outset. There was no significant difference in scores post-treatment between those who had vascular and nonvascular ED. Overall, the incidence of side effects due to sildenafil was 19.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Urethral trauma is frequently associated with ED. Sildenafil citrate is useful in the drug treatment of ED in these patients and appears to be well-tolerated.

Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor abuse: a critical review.

Abuse of sildenafil has been reported since its introduction in 1999 and commonly documented in combination with illicit drugs among men and women of all ages. Increased risks of sexually transmissible diseases including HIV have been associated with sildenafil use in men who have sex with men. Recognizing the abuse potential of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5), we aim to summarize the current knowledge of this abuse. An investigation of EMBASE, PubMed, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) website, MedWatch, and search engines was performed to evaluate information regarding sildenafil, tadalafil, and vardenafil abuse. The EMBASE search provided 46 articles fitting the search criteria and evaluation led to 21 separate publications with specific information regarding PDE5 abuse. A PubMed search found 10 additional publications. MedWatch reported 44 separate warnings since 2000, most of which reported contamination of herbal products with active drug components. Few reports of abuse were among the 14,818 reports in the FDA AERS for sildenafil. A search for "internet drug store" revealed 6.4 million hits and of 7000 internet pharmacies identified by the Verified Internet Pharmacy Practice Sites Program (VIPPS) only 4% were in proper compliance. The role internet pharmacies play in counterfeit PDE5 or abuse is not well documented; however based on easy access, direct patient marketing, and low advertised cost it is likely this role is underreported. Currently the best recommendation for providers is to recognize the possibility of abuse and to educate patients on risks of this behavior.

Assessment of thiopurine S-methyltransferase activity in patients prescribed thiopurines: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The evidence for testing thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT) enzymatic activity or genotype before starting therapy with thiopurine-based drugs is unclear. PURPOSE: To examine the sensitivity and specificity of TPMT genotyping for TPMT enzymatic activity, reducing harm from thiopurine by pretesting, and the association of thiopurine toxicity with TPMT status in adults and children with chronic inflammatory diseases. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Ovid HealthSTAR (from inception to December 2010) and BIOSIS and Genetics Abstracts (to May 2009). STUDY SELECTION: Two reviewers screened records and identified relevant studies in English. DATA EXTRACTION: Data on patient characteristics, outcomes, and risk for bias were extracted by one reviewer and independently identified by another. DATA SYNTHESIS: 54 observational studies and 1 randomized, controlled trial were included. Insufficient evidence addressed the effectiveness of pretesting. Genotyping sensitivity to identify patients with low and intermediate TPMT enzymatic activity ranged from 70.33% to 86.15% (lower-bound 95% CI, 54.52% to 70.88%; upper-bound CI, 78.50% to 96.33%). Sparse data precluded estimation of genotype sensitivity to identify patients with low to absent enzymatic activity. Genotyping specificity approached 100%. Compared with noncarriers, heterozygous and homozygous genotypes were both associated with leukopenia (odds ratios, 4.29 [CI, 2.67 to 6.89] and 20.84 [CI, 3.42 to 126.89], respectively). Compared with intermediate or normal activity, low TPMT enzymatic activity was significantly associated with myelotoxicity and leukopenia. LIMITATION: Available evidence was not rigorous and was underpowered to detect a difference in outcomes. CONCLUSION: Insufficient evidence addresses the effectiveness of TPMT pretesting in patients with chronic inflammatory diseases. Estimates of the sensitivity of genotyping are imprecise. Evidence confirms the known associations of leukopenia or myelotoxicity with reduced TPMT activity or variant genotype. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Noninvasive assessment of acute cardiopulmonary effects of an oral single dose of sildenafil in patients with idiopathic pulmonary hypertension.

We aimed to assess the acute cardiopulmonary effects of a 100-mg oral single dose of sildenafil in patients with idiopathic pulmonary hypertension (IPAH) using a well-validated but less-used noninvasive echocardiographic method for the measurement of both systolic and diastolic pulmonary artery pressure (PAP), by tricuspid regurgitation (TR) velocity curve analysis. We studied 12 consecutive patients with IPAH (10 patients with New York Heart Association functional class III, and 2 patients with functional class II). A 100-mg oral single dose of sildenafil was added to previous medications of all patients and its immediate effects were evaluated 1, 5, and 12 h after treatment. Using paired analysis, administration of a 100-mg oral single dose of sildenafil led to a significant reduction in mean PAP and a remarkable increase in pulmonary acceleration time (PAT) 1 h after treatment (P = 0.000; 95% confidence interval [CI] 18.99-26.00 and P = 0.005; 95% CI -12.89 to -2.95, respectively). In addition, although the right heart dimensions (right atrium and right ventricle) showed a trend toward improvement, the differences were not statistically significant (P = 0.13 and P = 0.08, respectively). Our results demonstrated that Doppler examination of TR alone can be easily used for the estimate of systolic and diastolic PAP in patients with IPAH. This study also shows that sildenafil is the only drug given orally that can evaluate the vasodilatory capacity of the pulmonary vascular bed in patients with IPAH, with promising effects on mPAP and PAT in these patients.

Thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT) assessment prior to starting thiopurine drug treatment; a pharmacogenomic test whose time has come.

Thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT) is involved in the metabolism of thiopurine drugs. Patients that due to genetic variation lack this enzyme or have lower levels than normal, can be adversely affected if normal doses of thiopurines are prescribed. The evidence for measuring TPMT prior to starting patients on thiopurine drug therapy has been reviewed and the various approaches to establishing a service considered. Until recently clinical guidelines on the use of the TPMT varied by medical specialty. This has now changed, with clear guidance encouraging clinicians to use the TPMT test prior to starting any patient on thiopurine therapy. The TPMT test is the first pharmacogenomic test that has crossed from research to routine use. Several analytical approaches can be taken to assess TPMT status. The use of phenotyping supported with genotyping on selected samples has emerged as the analytical model that has enabled national referral services to be developed to a high level in the UK. The National Health Service now has access to cost-effective and timely TPMT assay services, with two laboratories undertaking the majority of the work at national level and with several local services developing. There appears to be adequate capacity and an appropriate internal market to ensure that TPMT assay services are commensurate with the clinical demand.