Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography for bone assessment of neurogenic heterotopic ossification of the hip: a preliminary study.

BACKGROUND: Neurogenic heterotopic ossification (NHO) is a frequent complication, often involving the hip. The functional impact may require surgical management and pre-surgical imaging assessment is necessary, usually by computed tomography (CT). We aimed to compare the performances of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and CT for bone assessment on pre-surgical imaging of the heterotopic ossifications and their features in NHO of the hip. METHODS: This single-center prospective preliminary study included all patients who underwent surgery for NHO with joint limitation from July 2019 to March 2020. All patients had a CT after biphasic iodinated solution injection and an MRI including T1-weighted, STIR and ZTE sequences. Standardized reports were completed for both exams for each patient, evaluating location, implantation and fragmentation of NHO, relation to the joint capsule and bone mineralization, then were compared. RESULTS: Seven patients from 32 to 70 years old (mean = 50.2 ± 17.2 years) were evaluated. NHO were bilateral in 2 patients, for a total of nine hips: six right hips and three left hips. Observed concordance rates between MRI and CT were, respectively, 94.4% for location, 100% for circumferential extension, 87.3% for implantation 88.9% for fragmentation, 77.8% for relation to the joint capsule and 66.7% for bone mineralization. It was 100% for femoral neck fracture and osteonecrosis of the femoral head. CONCLUSION: This preliminary study suggests that pre-surgical MRI imaging should be considered as effective as CT for bone assessment of NHO and their features. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03832556. Registered February 6, 2019, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03832556 .

Clinical Assessment and Treatment Options for Posterior Hip Pain.

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis and treatment of posterior hip pain has increased due to advancements in clinical, anatomical, biomechanical, and related pathological understandings of the hip. Due to its complexity and close anatomical relationship with many osseous, neurovascular, and musculotendinous structures, posterior hip pain must be appropriately categorized based on its origin. Therefore, it is crucial that clinicians are able to determine whether patient complaints are of extra-articular or intra-articular nature so that they can implement the optimal treatment plan. In the current review article, we discussed posterior hip pain with an emphasis on the main differential diagnoses of deep gluteal syndrome, ischiofemoral impingement, and hamstring tear/hamstring syndrome. For the appropriate diagnosis and etiology of posterior hip pain, a thorough and conclusive clinical history is imperative. Physicians should rule out the possibility of spinal involvement by physical examination and if necessary, by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Furthermore, because of the vicinity to other, non-orthopedic structures, an obstetric and gynecologic history, general surgery history, and urologic history should be obtained. Following the collection of patient history clinicians should adhere to an established and efficient order of evaluation starting with standing then to seated, supine, lateral, and prone testing. Imaging assessment of posterior hip pain begins with a standard anterior-posterior pelvic radiograph, in addition to frog-leg lateral. MRI is pivotal for assessing soft tissue-related extra-articular causes of hip in patients with posterior hip pain. Non-surgical treatment is preferred in most cases of deep gluteal syndrome, ischiofemoral impingement, pudendal nerve entrapment, and proximal hamstring pathologies. Surgical treatment is saved as a last resort option in cases of failed non-surgical treatment.

Fulcrum to Generate Maximum Extension of the Spine and Hip-Proposing A New Strategy using EOS Imaging for Patient-specific Assessment of Degenerated Lumbar Spines.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective, radiographic comparative study conducted in a single academic institution. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare fulcrum extension with conventional extension imaging to determine maximum "hip lordosis" (HL), an important novel patient-specific parameter in spinal realignment surgery, as well as understand the extension capabilities of the lower lumbar spine, which together, are key contributors to whole-body balancing. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Recent literature recognizes the hip as an important contributor to whole-body lordosis beyond a compensator for spinal imbalance. METHODS: Patients >45 years' old with mechanical low back pain due to degenerative spinal conditions were included and grouped based on the imaging performed-fulcrum or conventional extension. All imaging was performed using EOS under standardized instructions and visual aids. Radiographic parameters include global lumbar angle (GLA), inflexion-S1 (Inf-S1) angle, segmental lumbar angles, pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), femoral alignment angle (FAA), HL and spinocoxa angle (SCA). Unpaired t test was used to compare between radiographic parameters. RESULTS: One hundred patients (40 males and 60 females, mean age 63.0 years) underwent either fulcrum or conventional extension EOS® imaging. Both groups had comparable baseline radiographic parameters. Fulcrum extension gave a larger mean GLA (-60.7° vs. -48.5°, P = 0.001), Inf-S1 angle (-58.8° vs. -48.8°, P = 0.003), SCA (-36.5° vs. -24.8°, P < 0.001), L4/5 and L5/S1 lordosis (-20.7° vs. -17.7°, P = 0.041, and -22.3° vs. -17.1°, P = 0.018, respectively), compared to conventional extension. PI, SS, PT, FAA, and HL were similar between both extension postures. CONCLUSION: Fulcrum extension, compared to conventional extension, is better at generating lordosis in the lower lumbar spine, thus improving preoperative assessment of stiffness or instability of the lumbar spine. Both extension methods were equally effective at determining the patient-specific maximum HL to assess the flexibility and compensation occurring at the hip, potentially guiding surgical management of patients with degenerative spines.Level of Evidence: 3.

Comparing self-assessment, functional, and anthropometric techniques in predicting osteoporosis.

The osteoporosis self-assessment tool was more accurate than hand grip strength, gait speed, and calf circumference in predicting osteoporosis in women. Hand grip strength was more accurate than the osteoporosis self-assessment tool, gait speed, and calf circumference in predicting osteoporosis in men. PURPOSE: The osteoporosis self-assessment tool, functional assessment, and anthropometric measurement are different techniques to identify those at risk of osteoporosis. This study aimed to compare the performance of these techniques in predicting osteoporosis. METHODS: In this cross-sectional, hospital-based study including 1109 participants, the bone mineral density of the spine and hips was evaluated using the dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. The Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool was used as a simple clinical risk assessment tool to screen for osteoporosis. Gait speed and hand grip strength were used as functional assessments to predict osteoporosis. Calf circumference was used as an anthropometric measurement to predict osteoporosis risk. RESULTS: In women, the Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool was better than hand grip strength, gait speed, and calf circumference in predicting osteoporosis. In contrast, in men, hand grip strength was better than the Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool, gait speed, and calf circumference. CONCLUSION: The application of simple, cost-effective techniques for the identification of osteoporosis risk will be beneficial for both screening and patient care when dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry is not available. We suggest that the Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool can be used to identify the risk of osteoporosis in women and hand grip strength measurement can be used for men.

Pathology Assessment of Femoral Head Resection Specimens: An Important Quality Assurance Procedure.

CONTEXT.­: Decisions to perform hip arthroplasty rely on both radiographic and clinical findings. Radiologists estimate degree of osteoarthritis (OA) and document other findings. Arthroplasty specimens are sometimes evaluated by pathology. OBJECTIVE.­: To determine the frequency of pathologic changes not recognized clinically. DESIGN.­: Nine hundred fifty-three consecutive femoral head resections performed between January 2015 and June 2018, with recent radiologic and histologic study, were reviewed. We compared severity of OA reported by radiology and pathology. Findings unrecognized radiographically but recorded pathologically, and discrepancies between clinical diagnosis and pathology diagnosis, were tabulated. RESULTS.­: Twenty-one cases of osteomyelitis were diagnosed radiographically or pathologically. Eight discrepancies were present. Fourteen osteomyelitis cases were recognized clinically. Pathology recognized 2 neoplasms missed radiographically. Avascular necrosis was diagnosed on pathology but not radiology in 25 cases, and 35 cases of avascular necrosis were seen radiographically but not pathologically. Osteoarthritis was graded both radiographically and pathologically from 0 to 3. Five hundred ninety-one of 953 cases (62%) were grade 3. Pathologists and radiologists had perfect agreement in 696 of 953 cases (73%). When grade of OA seen at pathology was correlated with surgeon, 2 groups of surgeons were detected: one with a low threshold for performance of hip arthroplasty (23%-28% low-severity OA) and the second with a high threshold (2%-5% low-severity OA). CONCLUSIONS.­: Correlation between radiology and pathology diagnoses is high. Degree of OA present varies significantly between surgeons. Pathology discloses findings not recognized clinically.

[Bone age - alternatives for skeletal maturity assessment for the EOS scanner]. / Csontkor ­ a csontrendszeri érettség mérésének lehetosége EOS készülékkel.

INTRODUCTION: Hand and wrist bone age assessment methods cannot be performed when using the recommended patient position within the EOS scanner. AIM: We aimed to assess alternative methods for use with the EOS. METHOD: After investigating 9 alternatives, five methods were selected - cervical vertebra (Hassel-Farman), iliac crest (Risser 'plus'), hip (Oxford), knee (O'Connor), calcaneus (Nicholson) - and applied to EOS scans of 114, 2-21-year-old normal individuals. Intraclass correlation coefficient tests for reliability and Spearman correlation with calendar age were assessed. RESULTS: Intra- and interobserver reliabilities were all excellent, except with the knee method (0.865 - 'good'). Calcaneal and cervical methods were the fastest to apply (mean 17.5 s, 33.4 s per evaluation), however, calcanei were unassessable in 14% of scans (versus 1% of cervical). All methods correlated significantly with calendar age (r>0.829, p<0.05). Difficulties were principally absent (12%) or obscured (23%) landmarks. CONCLUSION: Bone age assessment is possible with all 5 methods, however, the Hassel-Farman method proved to be easily useable, fast and reliable. Orv Hetil. 2019; 160(16): 619-628.

Sensitivity and specificity of post-operative interference gap assessment on plain radiographs after cementless primary THA.

INTRODUCTION: Implant performance of cementless THA is often evaluated by radiolucency on plain radiographs, often classified as interference gaps on direct post-operative radiographs. However, the diagnostic performance is unknown. The aim was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of radiographic assessment of post-operative gaps after primary THA by comparing it with CT confirmed gaps, and secondary to define optimal cut-off criteria for assessing gaps on plain radiographs compared with CT. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients (N = 40) with a primary cementless THA performed between July 2015 and March 2016 were enrolled in the study. Radiolucency was assessed on post-operative AP pelvic digital radiographs by two observers independently. Maximum width and percentage of coverage per zone were reported. Gap volume was measured by manual segmentation on CT images. RESULTS: When defining a gap as a radiolucency extending through >50% of a zone, the interrater agreement Kappa was 0.241. Sensitivity was 65.8% for observer 1 (Kappa = 0.432), and 86.8% for observer 2 (Kappa = 0.383). When defining a gap as a radiolucency with a width >1 mm, the interrater agreement Kappa was 0.302. Sensitivity was 55.3% and 50% for observer 1 and observer 2, respectively. The ROC-curve resulted in an optimal threshold of 0.65 mm (AUROC = 0.888) and 0.31 mm (AUROC = 0.961) for the two observers. CONCLUSION: The diagnostic performance of observers detecting interference gaps on radiographs showed low sensitivity. Further on, the inter-rater agreement is too low to do a general recommendation about thresholds for defining gaps. Evaluating progression of radiolucency on radiographs should be performed in the light of these findings.

3D-printed model improves clinical assessment of surgeons on anatomy.

Performing surgical procedures often requires a surgeon to develop a skill to create 3-dimensional (3D) mental model on patient's anatomy. Question remains whether the touching on the 3D printed model can facilitate learning of patient anatomy than viewing the rendered virtual on-screen model. The printed and the virtual 3D model were developed from CT films taken from a 4-year-old girl, who had dysplasia of the hip in the left hip. Eleven subjects were called to report measures on six key anatomical features on the hips. The reporting time and the accuracy were compared between the two models, along with the gaze characteristics of subjects while inspecting the models. The variables were analysed using a 2 × 2 within subject ANOVA to examine the difference between viewing the models (on-screen vs. printed-out) and the side of the hip (right vs. left). Interacting with the printed 3D model required shorter times and yielded more accurate visual judgments than viewing the virtual models on most of the anatomical features. Subjects performed a fewer number of fixations but with a longer mean fixation duration when interacting the printed than inspecting the virtual on-screen 3D model. Results confirmed the value of the printed 3D model on improving the clinical judgement on patient anatomy. Confidence in collecting information from the physical world and the cross-model sensor integration may explain why participants performed better with the printed model compared to the virtual model.

Errors in Patient Positioning for Bone Mineral Density Assessment by Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry: Effect of Technologist Retraining.

Improper positioning is one of the factors that can lead to incorrect bone mineral density (BMD) results. This study aimed to assess the frequencies of erroneous positioning during three periods: before retraining of the technologists (BR), after retraining (AR), and at the current timepoint 8 years after retraining (C). The BMD images of the first 150 consecutive patients who underwent DXA of the lumbar spine and hip during each of the three periods were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were excluded if they had severe scoliosis, rendering proper positioning impossible. Each BMD image was assessed by an International Society of Clinical Densitometry certified clinical densitometrist who was blinded to the date of the initial examination. For the lumbar spine in the BR group, the criteria frequently not met were inclusion of both iliac crests (33.8%), straightness (30.3%), and midline positioning (20.4%); the respective frequencies were significantly reduced to 0.8%-5.6%, 2.1%-3.0%, and 0%-2.8% in the AR and C groups (p < 0.05). For the hip in the BR group, the criteria frequently not met were straightness (52.8%) and internal rotation (21.8%); the respective frequencies were significantly reduced to 0%-4.2% and 8.3%-8.4% in the AR and C groups (p < 0.05). Overall improper positioning in the BR group was 49.3% and 57.3% at the lumbar spine and the hip, respectively; the respective frequencies were reduced to 9.3% and 12.7% in the AR group, and to 2.7% and 7.3% in the C group. The least significant change values for the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip also became smaller after retraining. Retraining the technologists improved patient positioning, as evidenced by the decreased frequencies of erroneous positioning and the improved least significant change values after the retraining.

Simple Assessment of Global Bone Density and Osteoporosis Screening Using Standard Radiographs of the Hand.

PURPOSE: Osteoporosis and fragility fractures have consequences both at the individual level and to the overall health care system. Although dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the reference standard for assessing bone mineral density (BMD), other, simpler tools may be able to screen bone quality provisionally and signal the need for intervention. We hypothesized that the second metacarpal cortical percentage (2MCP) calculated from standard radiographs of the hand or wrist would correlate with hip BMD derived from DXA and could provide a simple screening tool for osteoporosis. METHODS: Two hundred patients who had hand or wrist radiographs and hip DXA scans within 1 year of each other were included in this series. Mid-diaphyseal 2MCP was calculated as the ratio of the cortical diameter to the total diameter. We assessed the correlation between 2MCP and total hip BMD. Subjects were stratified into normal, osteopenic, and osteoporotic cohorts based on hip t scores, and thresholds were identified to optimize screening sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: Second metacarpal cortical percentage correlated significantly with BMD and t scores from the hip. A 2MCP threshold of less than 60% optimized sensitivity (88%) and specificity (60%) for discerning osteopenic subjects from normal subjects, whereas a threshold of less than 50% optimized sensitivity (100%) and specificity (91%) for differentiating osteoporotic from normal subjects. CONCLUSIONS: By demonstrating that global BMD may be assessed from 2MCP, these data suggest that radiographs of the hand and wrist may have a role in accurately screening for osteopenia and osteoporosis. This simple investigation, which is already used ubiquitously for patients with hand or wrist problems, may identify patients at risk for fragility fractures and allow for appropriate referral or treatment. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic II.

MRI assessment of the importance of the acetabular labrum: a comparative radiographic and MRI study in children's hips.

The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between radiograph [acetabular index (AI)] and MRI measurements of the angles of children's hips and the percentage of coverage that labrum provides to the acetabulum in healthy hips of children. The healthy hips of 38 children, of a mean age of 7.7 years, were studied using anteroposterior radiographs and coronal plane MRI. We used picture archiving and communication systems software to measure the AI in hip radiographs and the acetabular bone index (ABI) and acetabular labrum index (ALI) in hip MRIs. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and t-test were performed. Pearson's correlation and Bland and Altman plots were determined for analysis of measurement error and interobserver and intraobserver errors. Statistical significance was set at P value less than 0.05. Interobserver and intraobserver agreement was between 0.8 and 0.98. AI was 13.7°. ABI was 16.4° and ALI was 6.7°. There was a correlation between the angles of the hips determined by radiographs and MRI. The ALI accounted for 40.8% of the mean value of the ABI. The measurements of hip angles by radiographs were similar to the ones derived from MRI. In addition, the labrum adds stability to the healthy hip in a child, indicating a significant portion of the total coverage of the acetabulum to the femoral epiphysis. AI measurements from radiographs were lower than ABI measurements obtained from MRI. ALI was 41% of the ABI, which means that the labrums, in healthy hips of children significantly increase the coverage of the femoral epiphysis and also increase the stability of the acetabulum. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Transmission imaging for integrated PET-MR systems.

Attenuation correction for PET-MR systems continues to be a challenging problem, particularly for body regions outside the head. The simultaneous acquisition of transmission scan based µ-maps and MR images on integrated PET-MR systems may significantly increase the performance of and offer validation for new MR-based µ-map algorithms. For the Biograph mMR (Siemens Healthcare), however, use of conventional transmission schemes is not practical as the patient table and relatively small diameter scanner bore significantly restrict radioactive source motion and limit source placement. We propose a method for emission-free coincidence transmission imaging on the Biograph mMR. The intended application is not for routine subject imaging, but rather to improve and validate MR-based µ-map algorithms; particularly for patient implant and scanner hardware attenuation correction. In this study we optimized source geometry and assessed the method's performance with Monte Carlo simulations and phantom scans. We utilized a Bayesian reconstruction algorithm, which directly generates µ-map estimates from multiple bed positions, combined with a robust scatter correction method. For simulations with a pelvis phantom a single torus produced peak noise equivalent count rates (34.8 kcps) dramatically larger than a full axial length ring (11.32 kcps) and conventional rotating source configurations. Bias in reconstructed µ-maps for head and pelvis simulations was ⩽4% for soft tissue and ⩽11% for bone ROIs. An implementation of the single torus source was filled with (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose and the proposed method quantified for several test cases alone or in comparison with CT-derived µ-maps. A volume average of 0.095 cm(-1) was recorded for an experimental uniform cylinder phantom scan, while a bias of <2% was measured for the cortical bone equivalent insert of the multi-compartment phantom. Single torus µ-maps of a hip implant phantom showed significantly less artifacts and improved dynamic range, and differed greatly for highly attenuating materials in the case of the patient table, compared to CT results. Use of a fixed torus geometry, in combination with translation of the patient table to perform complete tomographic sampling, generated highly quantitative measured µ-maps and is expected to produce images with significantly higher SNR than competing fixed geometries at matched total acquisition time.

MRI versus computed tomography as an imaging modality for postreduction assessment of irreducible hips in developmental dysplasia of the hip: an interobserver and intraobserver reliability study.

Following surgical reduction of an irreducible hip in developmental dysplasia of the hip, imaging is required to ascertain successful reduction. Recent studies have compared MRI versus computed tomography (CT) in terms of cost, time, sensitivity and specificity. This is the first study to compare intraobserver and interobserver reliability for both modalities. Nineteen CT scans of 38 hips in 10 patients and nine MRI scans of 18 hips in six patients were reviewed on two separate occasions by three clinicians. Image clarity, confidence of diagnosis, time taken to perform the scan as well as radiation dose for CT were recorded. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability κ values were calculated. There were 14 female patients and one male patient. The mean age at the time of the scan was 12 months (range 3-25 months). Intraobserver reliability was greater than 0.8 (both CT and MRI). Interobserver reliability was greater than 0.8 (both CT and MRI). Image clarity was higher for CT for two out of the three clinicians (9.47 vs. 6.33 P<0.05; 9.89 vs. 8.11, P<0.05). All clinicians were equally confident in the diagnosis when using CT or MRI. The time taken to perform the investigation was not significantly different (3.32 vs. 4.88 min, P>0.05). The mean radiation dose for CT was 91.75 DLP (dose length product, mGy×cm) (95% confidence interval±26.95). Our results show that MRI is equal to CT as an imaging modality in the assessment of postreduction hips in developmental dysplasia of the hip. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability was excellent for both. The image clarity was higher for CT, but this method of imaging carries a significant risk of radiation exposure. We recommend that MRI should supersede CT as an imaging modality for this clinical situation.

Non-invasive Assessment of Lower Limb Geometry and Strength Using Hip Structural Analysis and Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography: A Population-Based Comparison.

Hip fracture is the most significant complication of osteoporosis in terms of mortality, long-term disability and decreased quality of life. In the recent years, different techniques have been developed to assess lower limb strength and ultimately fracture risk. Here we examine relationships between two measures of lower limb bone geometry and strength; proximal femoral geometry and tibial peripheral quantitative computed tomography. We studied a sample of 431 women and 488 men aged in the range 59-71 years. The hip structural analysis (HSA) programme was employed to measure the structural geometry of the left hip for each DXA scan obtained using a Hologic QDR 4500 instrument while pQCT measurements of the tibia were obtained using a Stratec 2000 instrument in the same population. We observed strong sex differences in proximal femoral geometry at the narrow neck, intertrochanteric and femoral shaft regions. There were significant (p < 0.001) associations between pQCT-derived measures of bone geometry (tibial width; endocortical diameter and cortical thickness) and bone strength (strength strain index) with each corresponding HSA variable (all p < 0.001) in both men and women. These results demonstrate strong correlations between two different methods of assessment of lower limb bone strength: HSA and pQCT. Validation in prospective cohorts to study associations of each with incident fracture is now indicated.

Impact of Femoroacetabular Impingement Morphology on Gait Assessment in Symptomatic Patients.

BACKGROUND: Gait is abnormal in patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). To date, studies have not correlated radiographic FAI morphology with gait abnormalities. HYPOTHESIS: Gait abnormalities in FAI patients will be associated with radiographic FAI morphology. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4. METHODS: Patients with symptomatic FAI (n = 20) underwent radiographic and gait analysis. Exclusion criteria included previous injuries or surgeries to the lower extremities or lumbar spine as well as bilateral symptomatic FAI. The alpha angle (AA) and center-edge angle (CEA) were measured on anteroposterior (AP) pelvis, Dunn lateral, and false-profile radiographs, and inter- and intraobserver variability was determined. Motion analysis techniques were used to obtain gait data including 3-dimensional kinematic and kinetic data. Descriptive analysis was performed using Spearman correlations for morphologic measurements. A stepwise regression model was used to examine the association of gait measures with AA and CEA. RESULTS: Intraobserver agreement for the AA and CEA was 0.92 (CI, 0.80-0.97) and 0.90 (CI, 0.76-0.96), while interobserver agreement for the angles was 0.96 (CI, 0.89-0.98) and 0.96 (CI, 0.90-0.98), respectively. Descriptive analysis suggested correlations between AA and peak external hip and knee external rotation moments, maximum ankle flexion angle, and ankle range of motion (range, -0.51 to 0.42; P < 0.0001). The CEA correlated with stride, peak external ankle eversion and inversion moments, peak external knee extension moment, and peak external hip flexion moment (range, -0.44 to 0.51; P < 0.0001). We found that gait variables accounted for a large amount of variation in AA (8 variables accounted for 87% variation) and in CEA (7 variables accounted for 82% variation). CONCLUSION: Lower extremity gait parameters correlate highly with radiographic FAI morphology in symptomatic FAI patients. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Gait abnormalities are present in FAI patients and may be a useful measure in outcome studies.

Diagnostic value of osteoporosis self-assessment tool for Asians (OSTA) and quantitative bone ultrasound (QUS) in detecting high-risk populations for osteoporosis among elderly Chinese men.

This study aims to evaluate an osteoporosis self-assessment tool for Asians (OSTA) and quantitative bone ultrasound (QUS) and their combination in detecting populations at high risk for osteoporosis, and to determine the best cutoff value for the diagnosis of osteoporosis among elderly Chinese men. A group of Chinese men, aged ≥ 60 years, recruited from the health checkup population of Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, were included. The OSTA index was calculated from age and weight. Bone mineral density (BMD) at left hip (femoral neck, internal, and total hip) and lumbar spine (L1-L4, L-Total) was measured with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and calcaneal BMD was measured with QUS. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to determine the best cutoff values, sensitivity, and specificity. The area under the curve (AUC) between the different screening tools was compared. Our study included 472 men with mean age of 78.0 years. The prevalence of osteoporosis was 27.7%.The best cutoff for OSTA was -3.5 for predicting men with osteoporosis at any site; this yielded a sensitivity and specificity of 47.3% and 76.8%, respectively. The AUC for OSTA was 0.676. The optimal cutoff for QUS-T score was -1.25, with a sensitivity of 80.4% and specificity of 59.7%. The AUC for QUS-T score was 0.762. Combining QUS with OSTA improved the specificity to 92.9% but reduced sensitivity to 36.1%. A new variable derived from a combination of OSTA and the QUS-T score gave a better performance, with sensitivity of 70.1% and specificity of 72.1%; the AUC for this variable was 0.771, which was greater than OSTA but not different from QUS alone. In conclusion, OSTA and QUS, respectively, and their combination may help find populations at high risk for osteoporosis, which could be an alternative method for diagnosing osteoporosis, especially in areas where DXA measurement is not accessible.

[Evaluation of general health status by SF-36 tool in Hip Osteoarthritis]. / Valoración subjetiva de salud en el paciente joven con coxoartrosis: aplicación del cuestionario SF-36.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the general health status perceived by patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty with mini-stem. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Health questionnaire SF-36 has been used to assess health perceived by 13 male patients with a mean age of 46.62 (34-53) years after the implantation of an uncemented, MiniHip® (CorinMedical) total hip arthroplasty, after a mean follow up of 23.2 (12-47) months. Results were compared with the reference values of Spanish men population from 45 to 54 years. RESULTS: Differences were found in areas such as physical and emotional role, physical function, social function and pain; while scores of the remaining items were similar to the population of reference. DISCUSSION: It is important to know how our surgical actions affect the quality of life of patients and how it is perceived by them to complement the results of our surgeries.

Objetivo: Determinar el estado de salud general percibida por los pacientes sometidos a artroplastia total de cadera con mini-vástago. Material y Método: Se ha administrado el cuestionario de salud SF-36 para evaluar el estado de salud percibido por 13 pacientes varones con una edad media de 46,62 (34-53) años en los que se implantó una artroplastia total de cadera no cementada tipo MiniHip® (CorinMedical) tras un seguimiento medio de 23,2 (12-47) meses. Los resultados obtenidos se compararon con los valores de referencia de la población española en varones de 45 a 54 años. Resultados: Se hallaron diferencias en aspectos como rol físico y emocional, función física, función social y dolor; mientras que en el resto de los ítems la puntuación fue similar a la de la población de referencia. Discusión: Existe la necesidad de conocer en qué grado afectan nuestras intervenciones a la calidad de vida del paciente y la manera en que es percibida por él mismo para complementar los resultados de nuestras intervenciones. Conclusión: Es necesaria una nueva perspectiva para la valoración funcional y de calidad de vida de los pacientes jóvenes sometidos a una artroplastia total de cadera.

The importance of morphometric radiographic vertebral assessment for the detection of patients who need pharmacological treatment of osteoporosis among postmenopausal diabetic Korean women.

UNLABELLED: Many diabetic patients with vertebral fractures remain undiagnosed and untreated. We found that more than two-thirds of osteoporotic diabetic women could not be identified for pharmacological treatment according to the NOF guidelines if without radiographic vertebral assessment. This study shows the importance of radiographic vertebral assessment for identifying patients who need treatment for osteoporosis in diabetic women. INTRODUCTION: Diagnosis of vertebral fracture (VF) is important for identifying patients who need pharmacologic therapy for osteoporosis. However, many patients with vertebral fractures remain undiagnosed and untreated. This study evaluated the number of patients with VFs who would be unrecognized as candidates for osteoporosis treatments according to the National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF) Clinician's Guidelines to the Treatment of Osteoporosis, among postmenopausal diabetic Korean women without spinal imaging. METHODS: A total of 873 postmenopausal diabetic women were enrolled. Lateral plain radiographs of the thoracolumbar spine and total hip BMD were obtained. The Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX®) probability was computed using the algorithm available online at http://www.shef.ac.uk/FRAX (South Korea version). The subjects with and without VFs were classified into candidates for osteoporosis treatment [Tx+by NOF] and not candidates for osteoporosis treatment [Tx−by NOF] according to the NOF pharmacologic treatment guidelines, regardless of the presence of VFs. RESULTS: Forty-six percent of postmenopausal diabetic womenhad morphometric VFs. Among the subjects with morphometric VFs, only 2% of the patients had previously diagnosed VFs by medical doctors. In addition, 73.6% of the patients with VFs were not included in the [Tx+by NOF] group, given the assumption of no radiographic diagnosis of VFs. CONCLUSIONS: With regard to increased risk of VFs in postmenopausal Korean women with type 2 diabetes mellitus, radiographic vertebral assessment would be useful for the clinical identification of osteoporosis and fractures.

Three-year experience with risedronate therapy for patients with an increased fracture risk: assessment of proximal femoral bone density and geometry by DXA.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: We previously reported that risedronate improved the structural parameters of the proximal femur, as well as lumbar spine and proximal femoral bone mineral density (BMD), after 1 year of therapy by suppressing bone resorption in patients with an increased risk of fracture. Our practice-based observational study was subsequently extended to determine whether these effects were enhanced, maintained or attenuated after 3 years. METHODS: A total of 174 patients (nine men and 165 postmenopausal women) with a mean age of 67.8 years who had osteoporosis or osteopenia and clinical risk factors for fracture started risedronate therapy. The BMD of the lumbar spine and proximal femur, as well as proximal femoral structural parameters, were evaluated by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry with advanced hip assessment (AHA) software at baseline and every year for 3 years. RESULTS: Data were available for 107 patients at 1 year, 80 patients at 2 years and 74 patients at 3 years. Lumbar spine, total hip and femoral neck BMD and the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the proximal femur increased from baseline after 1 year with levels being maintained after 2-3 years. The cross-sectional moment of inertia (CSMI) of the proximal femur increased from baseline after 1 year and the increase was enhanced after 2 years with levels being maintained after 3 years. The femoral strength index (FSI) increased from baseline after 1 and 2 years and the increase was enhanced after 3 years. The increases in proximal femoral CSMI and FSI were greater than those of total hip and femoral neck BMD after 3 years of therapy. CONCLUSION: The present study showed the effects of risedronate therapy for 3 years on the BMD of the lumbar spine and proximal femur, as well as on proximal femoral structure, in patients with an increased risk for fracture.