Assessment of Quinidine-Induced Torsades de Pointes Risks Using a Whole-Body Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model Linked to Cardiac Ionic Current Inhibition.

The lethality of torsades de pointes (TdP) by drugs is one of main reasons that some drugs were withdrawn from the market. In order to assess drug-induced TdP risks, a model of cardiac ionic current suppression in human ventricular myocytes (ToR-ORd model), combined with the maximum effective free therapeutic plasma concentration or the maximum effective free therapeutic myocyte concentration was often used, with the latter proved to be more relevant and more accurate. We aimed to develop a whole-body physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model, incorporated with a human cardiomyocyte pharmacodynamic (PD) model, to provide a comprehensive assessment of drug-induced TdP risks in normal and specific scenarios. Quinidine served as an example to validate the PBPK-PD model via predicting plasma quinidine concentrations and quinidine-induced changes in QT interval (ΔQTc). The predicted plasma quinidine concentrations and ΔQTc values following oral administration or intravenous administration of quinidine were comparable to clinic observations. Visual predictive checks showed that most of the observed plasma concentrations and ΔQTc values fell within the 5th and 95th percentiles of simulations. The validated PBPK-PD model was further applied to assess the TdP risks using frequencies of early afterdepolarization and long-QT syndrome occurrence in 4 scenarios, such as therapeutic dose, supra-therapeutic dose, alkalosis, and hyperkalemia in 200 human subjects. In conclusion, the developed PBPK-PD model may be applied to predict the quinidine pharmacokinetics and quinidine-induced TdP risks in healthy subjects, but also simulate quinidine-induced TdP risks under disease conditions, such as hypokalemia and alkalosis.

Assessment of Drug Proarrhythmic Potential in Electrically Paced Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Ventricular Cardiomyocytes Using Multielectrode Array.

Human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CMs) have been widely used for the assessment of drug proarrhythmic potential through multielectrode array (MEA). HiPSC-CM cultures beat spontaneously with a wide range of frequencies, however, which could affect drug-induced changes in repolarization. Pacing hiPSC-CMs at a physiological heart rate more closely resembles the state of in vivo ventricular myocytes and permits the standardization of test conditions to improve consistency. In this study, we systematically investigated the time window of stable ion currents in high-purity hiPSC-derived ventricular cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-vCMs) and confirmed that these cells could be used to correctly predict the proarrhythmic risk of Comprehensive In Vitro Proarrhythmia Assay (CiPA) reference compounds. To evaluate drug proarrhythmic potentials at a physiological beating rate, we used a MEA to electrically pace hiPSC-vCMs, and we recorded regular field potential waveforms in hiPSC-vCMs treated with DMSO and 10 CiPA reference drugs. Prolongation of field potential duration was detected in cells after exposure to high- and intermediate-risk drugs; in addition, drug-induced arrhythmia-like events were observed. The results of this study provide a simple and feasible method to investigate drug proarrhythmic potentials in hiPSC-CMs at a physiological beating rate.

Assessment of the efficacy and safety of antiarrhythmic therapy for chronic atrial fibrillation: observations on the role of trial design and implications of drug-related mortality.

The findings in clinical trials of antiarrhythmic drug efficacy and safety are frequently difficult to compare, since study design often has an important effect on trial outcome. To explore this problem further, we compared three designs--randomized control, nonrandomized control, and uncontrolled--collectively enrolling 2415 patients in 21 trials reporting on the role of quinidine in the prevention of chronic atrial fibrillation. The proportion of patients remaining in sinus rhythm at 3, 6, and 12 months after cardioversion was calculated by means of Kaplan-Meier techniques, and the data were pooled for each trial design. For the randomized control trials the difference in the absolute percentage of patients remaining in sinus rhythm in the quinidine and control groups was 24% at each of the three follow-up intervals. Contrary to findings in the randomized control trials, the magnitude of the treatment benefit in nonrandomized trials was smaller and declined markedly over time. The percentage of patients remaining in sinus rhythm in the uncontrolled trials was intermediate to the percentages in the other two trial designs. When the data from all three trial designs were pooled, the crude mortality rate was 2.0% in quinidine-treated patients and 0.6% in control patients. Sudden cardiac death or ventricular fibrillation was the cause of death in 13 of 19 patients for whom the cause of death was known, highlighting the potential risk of quinidine-induced proarrhythmia. Although quinidine is effective in maintaining sinus rhythm, estimates of the treatment effect vary among trial types.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Comparative cost-effectiveness analysis of quinidine, procainamide and mexiletine.

Quinidine and procainamide have the potential for major organ toxicity, whereas mexiletine has been reported to have little risk of organ toxicity, serious proarrhythmia or congestive heart failure, but a relatively high incidence of nuisance side effects. In light of the potential adverse effects of all antiarrhythmic agents as highlighted by the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial, the relative cost-effectiveness of these 3 agents was assessed. Based on a review of greater than 1,000 published reports, studies included in the analysis examined greater than or equal to 1 of these agents in adults, with adequate efficacy or safety data, or both. The majority of studies assessed patients with symptomatic or malignant arrhythmias, or both. Data were analyzed using a decision analysis/cost-effectiveness model. Probabilities were averaged using techniques of meta-analysis. Costs were obtained from a university medical center cost-accounting system and from expected follow-up visits to university clinics. Thirty-seven separate side effects were included in the analysis. In terms of overall cost, 12 months of mexiletine would engender $875, quinidine $1,239 and procainamide $1,911 of expenses. Mexiletine dominates the older agents in terms of cost per successful drug response, a result that holds over a wide range of efficacy and safety data. Analyses demonstrated no increase in all-cause mortality for quinidine and mexiletine over placebo, but a trend toward higher mortality with procainamide. The results suggest that mexiletine is a cost-saving alternative therapy for ventricular arrhythmias when adverse reactions are considered in addition to pharmaceutical costs and treatment efficacy.

Drug-antacid interactions: assessment of clinical importance.

Antacids and adsorbents are commonly used preparations that are generally considered to be pharmacologically inert and free from adverse effects. They may, however, interact with a diverse range of primary drugs and the sequelae can be disadvantageous to the efficacy of the primary medication. Many such reports in the literature are based on animal experiments, or on single-dose studies in healthy subjects. Some reports are anecdotal and are unconfirmed; others are based solely on in vitro evidence. Potentially important interactions have been suggested for a relatively small group of drugs: tetracyclines, phenytoin, digoxin, chloroquine, cimetidine, quinidine, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, and beta-blocking agents. The evidence for these has been critically evaluated, as well as for antacid-anticoagulant and antacid-nitrofurantoin interactions that have been wrongly emphasized in the literature. The majority of literature reports on interactions with antacids have been overemphasized; only ferrous sulfate-, isoniazid-, and tetracycline-antacid interactions fall into a category I importance (scale I-III of descending importance). This category is for those interactions with good evidence of actual or potential importance in patients or in relevant studies on normal subjects.